Quality of preimplant low-dose tomography

Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality: a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effective dose and image quality of horizontal CBCT in comparison with multislice spiral CT (MSCT) in scans of the head, cervical spine, ear and dental arches.

METHODS

A head and neck Alderson-Rando® phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) equipped with 74 thermoluminescence dosemeters was exposed according to 5 different scans in CBCT and 4 different scans in MSCT. Spatial and contrast resolutions, in terms of modulation transfer function and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), were measured to obtain a quantitative assessment of image quality.

RESULTS

The CBCT effective dose was 248, 249, 361, 565 and 688 µSv in the cervical spine, head, ear, dental arches with small field of view and dental arches with medium field of view, respectively. The MSCT effective dose was 3409, 1892, 660 and 812 µSv in the cervical spine, head, ear and dental arches, respectively. The modulation transfer function was 0.895 vs 0.347, 0.895 vs 0.275, 0.875 vs 0.342 and 0.961 vs 0.352 for CBCT vs MSCT in the cervical spine, head, ear and dental arches, respectively. Head and cervical spine MSCT showed greater CNR than CBCT, whereas CNR of the ear and dental arches showed comparable values.

CONCLUSIONS

CBCT was preferable to MSCT for the ear and dental arches volumetric imaging due to its lower radiation dose and significantly higher spatial resolution. In the case of cervical spine and head imaging, MSCT should be generally recommended if a high contrast resolution is required, despite the greater radiation exposure.

A comparative study of accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam and multi-slice computed tomographies for evaluation of mandibular canal location in dry mandibles

Background:

Cross- sectional tomograms have been used for optimal pre-operative planning of dental implant placement. The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) measurements of specific distances around the mandibular canal by comparing them to those obtained from Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (MSCT) images.

Materials and Methods:

Ten hemi-mandible specimens were examined using CBCT and MSCT. Before imaging, wires were placed at 7 locations between the anterior margin of the third molar and the anterior margin of the second premolar as reference points. Following distances were measured by two observers on each cross-sectional CBCT and MSCT image: Mandibular Width (W), Length (L), Upper Distance (UD), Lower Distance (LD), Buccal Distance (BD), and Lingual Distance (LID). The obtained data were evaluated using SPSS software, applying paired t-test and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results:

There was a significant difference between the values obtained by MSCT and CBCT measurement for all areas such as H, W, UD, LD, BD, and LID, (P < 0.001), with a difference less than 1 mm. The ICC for all distances by both techniques, measured by a single observer with a one week interval and between 2 observers was 99% and 98%, respectively. Comparing the obtained data of both techniques indicates that the difference between two techniques is 2.17% relative to MSCT.

Conclusion:

The results of this study showed that there is significant difference between measurements obtained by CBCT and MSCT. However, the difference is not clinically significant.

Dimensional accuracy and details of the panoramic cross-sectional tomographic images: an in vitro study

INTRODUCTION

Transversal slicing system (TSS) of Planmeca PM 2002 CC is a tomographic technique which enables us to take cross-sectional views of jaws. Tomographic imaging modalities are commonly applied to acquire cross-sectional images of the jaws for preimplant assessment of bone. Among the available tomographic imaging modalities, panoramic radiography is the most accessible imaging system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study was conducted using 25 mandibles, out of these five were used for linear dimensional accuracy measurement and the rest 20 were utilized to study the details within the mandible. Study was aimed to evaluate dimensional stability in the images using different parameters, such as determination of direction of slice, determination of horizontal and vertical magnification, angular distortion, three dimensional distortion and determination of details.

RESULTS

For the direction of slice and for determination of horizontal and vertical magnification change in + 5º to - 5º was in acceptable limit. In determination of details, it was found that there was great discrepancy in readings given by nonradiologist which offset the mean value which was attributed to lack of training for interpretation of the observers.

CONCLUSION

99% of the readings were in the clinically acceptable limits.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The easy availability, use of routine equipment, the low cost, low radiation dose for cross-sectional radiography make the TSS most preferred modality.

Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size

OBJECTIVE

To compare panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size for three implant systems (Brånemark, Straumann(®), 3i).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Presurgical panoramic (Pan) and cross-sectional tomograms (Tomo) of 121 implant sites in 121 patients scheduled for single-tooth implant treatment were recorded; in 70 of the Pans (Pan-B), a metal ball was placed in the edentulous area. By means of dedicated software, an implant with subjectively determined proper dimensions for the respective site was outlined by manually placing four reference points in each image by three observers. Additionally, four reference points corresponding to the margins of the metal ball were manually placed in Pan-Bs. The length and width of the implant were calculated after calibration to the reference ball (true magnification) in Pan-Bs and to a "standard" calibration method in all images (magnification factor 1.25 in Pans and 1.7 in Tomos). Based on the corrected dimensions, the nearest, smaller implant size was selected among those available in each of the three implant systems.

RESULTS

When comparing Pans with Tomos, selected implant size differed in on average 89% of the cases. The length differed in 69% and the width in 66%. Implants planned on Tomos were longer than those planned on Pans in 47% and narrower in 30% (<10% in posterior regions). The Straumann(®) system, with the smallest range of available implant sizes was significantly less affected by the radiographic method compared with the other two systems.

CONCLUSION

The selected implant size differed considerably when planned on panoramic or cross-sectional tomographs.

Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks

BACKGROUND

The technical development has given a new type of modality, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This technique has a high potential to solve different diagnostic problems among which is preoperative planning for implants in the posterior mandible.

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the visibility of the mandibular canal and the marginal bone crest and the agreement between observers in images from one CBCT technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients were examined with 3D Accuitomo (J. Morita Mfg. Corp., Kyoto, Japan) in one side of the mandible, where the second premolar and molars were lost. The examined volume was 30 by 40 mm. Seven observers evaluated the visibility and the location of the mandibular canal and the marginal crest by visually deciding if the structures were clearly visible, probably visible, or invisible in one cross-sectional image, approximately 1 cm posterior to the mental foramen. In a later session, the observers also marked the two anatomic structures. If the decision was not "clearly visible" or if the anatomic structures were difficult to identify, the observers had to use other cross-sectional, axial, and/or sagittal images in the volume.

RESULTS

The confidence among the observers evaluating the marginal bone crest was high. Two observers never used any other images, and the rest took help in two to seven cases. When marking the mandibular canal, the observers, in general, used more images. In five cases (17%), all the observers only used the single cross-sectional image. The agreement on the position of the canal was also high.

CONCLUSION

With this CBCT modality (3D Accuitomo), the visibility of the mandibular canal and the marginal crest, as well as the observer agreement of the location of these structures, was high. Hence, the 3D Accuitomo can be recommended for implant planning in the posterior mandible.

Pre-operative radiographs for dental implants - are selection criteria being followed?

OBJECTIVES

To determine by anonymous survey whether the active membership of a particular dental society with variable training and clinical experience in dental implant insertion and restoration followed the published selection criteria for the pre-operative radiographic assessment of prospective dental implant osteotomy sites.

DESIGN

Postal survey.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A postal questionnaire was sent to all professionally active members of the British Society of Periodontology (n = 560) during July 2005. The mailing was repeated in September 2005.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fifty-nine questionnaires were returned a response rate of 81.5%. One hundred and seventy-nine (39%) respondents were not involved in placing or restoring dental implants and were excluded. Of the remaining 280 (61%), 15 (5%) clinicians limited themselves to placing implants, 85 (30%) limited themselves to restoring implants, while 181 (65%) both placed and restored their own implants. Two hundred and twenty-eight clinicians (80.8%) did not follow UK selection criteria for single sites; 217 clinicians (77.5%) did not follow the criteria for multiple sites. Two hundred and sixty-three clinicians (94%) did not follow USA selection criteria. There were no statistically significant differences in compliance based on clinical experience or the number of implants placed. The only statistically significant difference was as a result of training those clinicians who had attended formal training courses were more likely to comply with published selection criteria. Significant differences also existed between the groups in the specific cross-sectional imaging modalities chosen.

CONCLUSION

Over 80% of respondents are not following the UK or USA selection criteria for pre-implant imaging assessment. The results of this survey call into question the clinical relevance, usefulness, or knowledge of existing selection criteria. There is a need for new selection criteria developed by both radiologists and experienced implant clinicians.

Diagnostic value of computed tomography in re-treatment of root fillings in maxillary molars

AIM

To compare the diagnostic information and radiation dose between intraoral radiography and computed tomography (CT) in re-treatment decision making concerning root fillings in maxillary molars.

METHODOLOGY

Thirty-nine root-filled maxillary molars with suspected apical periodontitis were examined with two intraoral periapical radiographs and CT. Presence of periapical lesion/s per tooth and root were analysed for both techniques. In addition, in the CT images, the number of root canals, erosion, or perforation of cortical bone plates, and the distance between palatal root and cortical bone plates were evaluated. Radiation dose for CT was registered and calculated; and that of periapical radiographs used as reported previously (Ekestubbe et al. 2004).

RESULTS

Periapical radiographs revealed periapical lesions in 33 teeth compared with 38 on CT images. A lesion of any root was detected more often with CT. The mesiobuccal root had two root canals in 30 teeth of which 27 of the MB2 canals were not filled, and 22 roots with an unfilled canal were associated a periapical lesion. Distances to palatal root, from the buccal and palatal cortex were measured in CT and varied between 5.0-12.0 mm and 0-4.0 mm, respectively. Based on the radiographic information, a variety of treatment alternatives were suggested. Mean effective dose of periapical radiographs was 0.02 mSv and that of CT 0.055 mSv.

CONCLUSIONS

Computed tomography may give important information in re-treatment decision when considering root fillings in maxillary molars. The radiation dose should be considered individually.

Cross-sectional tomograms obtained with four panoramic radiographic units in the assessment of implant site measurements

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of four panoramic X-ray units to produce cross-sectional images and to assess the effect of interexaminer and intraexaminer variations on the results.

METHODS

Cross-sectional tomograms of a human cadaver mandible were taken from two edentulous and one dentate area using four different X-ray units: OP-100 Ortho Trans (Instrumentarium Imaging Co, Tuusula, Finland), Proscan (Planmeca Co, Helsinki, Finland), Cranex-Tome and Scanora (Soredex, Orion Co, Espoo, Finland). Four different linear distances were measured from each radiograph. The mandible was then cut into 4 mm thick slices at three marked places. These slices were microradiographed and used as the gold standard for measurements made from each cross-sectional tomogram.

RESULTS

Of all measurements only the thickness of the mandible in the radiographs taken with the OP-100 differed significantly (P < 0.021) from the gold standard. In the interexaminer variation, the agreement was 85% and Kappa index 0.68. In the intraexaminer reproducibility, the agreement was 76.7% and Kappa indices 0.52 and 0.50.

CONCLUSIONS

The X-ray units studied were found to be similar in terms of image performance and the produced images were acceptable for dental implant placement planning. Interexaminer and intraexaminer variations can be large and the main source of error can be the interpreter him or herself.

Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images

This study was carried out to compare the accuracy of determination of the mandibular contour and the position of the mandibular canal in cadaver mandibles by the multiplanar reconstruction method (MPR-CT), which has recently come to be used widely for preoperative examinations, with those by tomographic techniques and to evaluate the usefulness of MPR-CT. Using three imaging systems, i.e. Quantum CT scanner, Scanora, and OP-100, a total of 6 sites were scanned in the molar regions of 3 cadaver mandibles. The images obtained were measured twice each by 4 radiologists. The anatomic structures measured were the height and thickness of the mandible, distance from the alveolar crest to the mandibular canal, and distance from the buccal cortical bone to the mandibular canal. After scanning, the scanned areas of the mandibles were sliced at a thickness of 2 mm, and soft X-ray images of these slices were obtained. The values of the above 4 anatomic structures obtained by measurements in the soft X-ray radiograms using digital-display calipers were regarded as true values. When compared with the true values, the errors in the distance from the alveolar crest to the mandibular canal were within 1 mm (+/- 1 mm) in 93.7% of the measurements by Direct-CT, 89.6% of the measurements by MPR-CT, 87.5% of the measurements by Scanora, and 47.9% of the measurements by OP-100, and the accuracy of the 4 methods ranked in the order of Direct-CT, MPR-CT, Scanora, and OP-100. A similar tendency was observed in the measurements of other anatomic structures, and statistically significant differences were observed among the methods. Thus, MPR-CT allows more accurate measurements than by the other 2 tomographic techniques,and to be useful as a preoperative examination for implant surgery.

Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film–screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this pilot study was to compare the image quality of a storage phosphor system with that of conventional film-screen in pre-implant conventional tomography, and to test the influence of radiation dose on image quality in the storage phosphor system.

METHODS

Cross-sectional conventional tomographic images (Scanora) technique) were obtained on 11 patients with film-screen and with storage phosphor image plates (Digora) PCT) at normal and low doses. Ten observers graded the visibility of anatomical structures of importance for implant planning. A three-step rating scale was used, where -1 =worse, 0=equal and 1=better than the reference image.

RESULTS

Although image quality was graded as equally good in the majority (59%) of images, the storage phosphor system scored significantly lower than film-screen (-0.37 vs 0.00, respectively) for all the images. Low dose storage phosphor images were rated significantly lower (-0.21) than normal dose images (0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

In the majority of patients, anatomic structures of importance for implant planning are visualized equally well on storage phosphor and film-screen images. However, where differences do exist, storage phosphor images score lower than film-screen images. Dose reduction in the storage phosphor system had a negative influence on image quality.

Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

As the use of oral implants for the treatment of partially as well as fully edentulous patients has increased the past two decades, more specialized radiographic techniques have become available for the preoperative planning of oral implant placement.

PURPOSE

The goal of this article was to enable clinicians to select the appropriate imaging techniques when planning for oral implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This artide reviews the available literature about various imaging techniques and their indication for the preoperative planning of oral implants. The advantages and drawbacks of each technique are described. A dosimetric overview is given relative to different radiologic techniques used in various clinical situations.

RESULTS

For preoperative planning of implant placement, advantages and drawbacks of the available imaging techniques have been considered, which allows guidelines for image technique selection to be formulated based on the clinical situation provided, considering the diagnostic yield of each technique and the radiation doses involved.

CONCLUSIONS

From the available literature, it can be stated that many clinical situations demand the use of cross-sectional imaging techniques for optimal preoperative planning of implant placement. Nevertheless, such techniques are not required in cases in which the clinical examination reveals sufficient bone width and where standard radiographic examinations, such as intraoral and panoramic radiography, reveal adequate bone height and space for implant placement.

Clinical application of spiral tomography in anterior implant placement: case report

BACKGROUND

Placement of endosseous dental implants in edentulous areas of the anterior maxilla poses a unique challenge due to variations in the amount of residual alveolar bone. Implant position becomes crucial in cases demanding high esthetic results but possessing minimal ridge width or in cases requiring augmentation. Recent advances in spiral tomography have allowed for more precise planning and placement of endosseous implants in these challenging areas.

METHODS

The purpose of this report is to describe a series of clinical cases in which spiral tomography was utilized in the planning and placement of endosseous dental implants. Two cases will be described utilizing initial spiral tomographic radiographs for implant planning and surgical guide fabrication, followed by post-insertion tomography to evaluate the results of implant position and inclination.

RESULTS

Preimplant spiral tomograms revealed that the initial prosthetic trajectory through the proposed incisal edge of each tooth replacement would result in a final osteotomy site that would compromise the overall thickness of the facial cortical plate. After adjusting for magnification and distortion factors, new prosthetic/surgical trajectories were fabricated into the surgical guide, and this information was utilized to prepare the final implant osteotomy site. This adjustment resulted in 2 mm of residual crestal facial bone postimplant insertion, which became wider at more apical measurements. These findings were verified in the postimplant serial tomograms.

CONCLUSIONS

Spiral tomography was a valuable adjunct in the treatment planning phases of endosseous dental implant placement especially in cases with minimal crestal width, high esthetic demands, or where exact implant placement is critical for successful treatment outcomes.

Localisation of the mandibular canal using conventional spiral tomography: a human cadaver study

For certain surgical procedures (e.g. placement of implants), an accurate localisation of the mandibular canal is of utmost importance to avoid injuries to the neurovascular bundle. The aim of the present study was to evaluate, on human fresh cadavers (n = 6), the accuracy of conventional spiral tomography for the localisation of the mandibular canal. By means of the Cranex TOME multifunctional unit (Orion Corporation Soredex, Helsinki, Finland), tomographic slices were taken at 3 different locations in the left posterior mandible (distal to the mental foramen). The mandibles were then sectioned at these 3 sites with a microtome. With a digital sliding caliper, the following 3 measurements were performed both on the tomograms and the bone sections at the three sites: 1) distance from the crest to mandibular canal, 2) overall bone height and 3) bone width. Overestimations of the distance to the mandibular canal (8/18) ranged from 1.05 to 0.10 mm and underestimations from 0.30 to 1.36 mm. The same number of over- and underestimations occurred for the bone height (1.14 to 0.14 mm and 0.15 to 1.40 mm, respectively). The bone width scored more overestimations (10/18), ranging from 1.40 to 0.12 mm, while underestimations ranged from 0.25 to 1.35 mm. From the present results, it is concluded that spiral tomography using the Cranex TOME multifunctional X-ray unit provides accurate information and sufficient detail for preoperative planning of implant placement in the posterior mandible.