Safety of inhaled corticosteroid therapy in young children with asthma

No effect of fluticasone propionate on linear growth in preschool children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Eighty percent of asthmatic children develop asthma symptoms by the age of 5 years. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), depending on dosage, may cause linear growth reduction and adrenal gland suppression. There are few studies about linear growth of preschool children with asthma. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether there is any effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) on linear growth and adrenal gland function.

METHODS

Twenty-eight children aged 18-52 months with persistent asthma receiving ICS FP 100-200 µg daily were studied for 1 year. Patients were divided into two groups according to clinical parameters: well (group 1) and poorly controlled (group 2). Height was measured every 3 months and expressed as height standard deviation score (SDS). Cumulative dose of FP expressed in mg was calculated for every patient. Early morning levels of serum adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol were assessed at the beginning and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

Patients took FP for an average of 11 months in group 1 and 16 months in group 2, which was not statistically significantly different. At the end of the study height SDS difference was -0.0143 in group 1 and -0.2000 in group 2, which was not statistically significantly different (t= 0.6072, P= 0.5489). There was also no statistically significant difference for average cortisol (P= 0.4381) or ACTH (P= 0.5845) concentration at the end of the study.

CONCLUSION

FP 100-200 µg daily had no effect on linear growth or on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal gland axis but further follow up is necessary.

[Inhaled corticosteroids in asthma: which have the best tolerance?]

Asthmatic syndrome, better definition of asthma, is an inflammatory chronic disease, probably the most frequent in pediatrics. An important characteristic of asthma is the bronchial inflammation with a complex network of cells and inflammatory mediators of pivotal importance in the pathogenesis. The long term control and treatment of this disease are cardinal points of the management of asthmatic syndrome. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the first-line treatment for persistent asthma in children of any age. The adverse events of the inhaled steroids on growth, bone mineralization, and hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis function are the main concerns for the pediatricians. The long-term effects on growth and bone mineralization are actually reassuring. Good tolerance is achieved on hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis function with low to moderate doses in children. Scientific and clinical researches are pointed to find out molecules able to improve clinical efficacy of ICS with better tolerance and higher reduction of adverse events.

Therapeutic management of allergic diseases

Allergic diseases are characterized by the activation of inflammatory cells and by a massive release of mediators. The aim of this chapter was to describe succinctly the modes of action, indications, and side effects of the major antiallergic and antiasthmatic drugs. When considering the ideal pharmacokinetic characteristics of a drug, a poorly metabolized drug may confer a lower variability in plasma concentrations and metabolism-based drug interactions, although poorly metabolized drugs may be prone to transporter-based disposition and interactions. The ideal pharmacological properties of a drug include high binding affinity, high selectivity, and appropriate association and dissociation rates. Finally, from a patient perspective, the frequency and route of administration are important considerations for ease of use.

Inhaled corticosteroids and asthma control in children: assessing impairment and risk

OBJECTIVE

To review the use of inhaled corticosteroids on asthma control in children by using the new therapeutic paradigm outlined in the Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by using the Medline and Embase databases (January 1996 to October 2007).

RESULTS

A total of 18 placebo-controlled, clinical trials in >8000 children (aged 0-17 years) with asthma met the criteria for evaluating monotherapy with inhaled corticosteroids: 13 double-blind studies of inhaled corticosteroids versus placebo and 5 controlled studies that compared inhaled corticosteroids to a nonsteroid antiinflammatory agent. The findings can be summarized as follows: (1) Compared with placebo, inhaled corticosteroid treatment was associated with reductions in both the impairment and risk domains. (2) Improvements in impairment and risk observed with inhaled corticosteroids were generally greater than those observed with nonsteroid antiinflammatory comparator medications. (3) Inhaled corticosteroids were well tolerated. (4) Small reductions in growth rates were evident when compared with placebo and/or comparator nonsteroid antiinflammatory medication use in the long-term (>1-year) studies, but when measured, the reductions diminished with time.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids improves the asthma-control domains of impairment and risk in children. Differences in study protocols make detailed comparisons difficult. Specific needs for additional trials include (1) more studies using appropriate indicators for impairment (eg, rescue-medication use; symptoms scores; asthma/episode-free days) and risk (eg, forced expiratory volume in 1 second in children who can perform spirometry; exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids; urgent care usage) and (2) more studies evaluating adolescents; the majority of the data reported were for children up to the age of 12 years, and data for adolescents are often lost (either grouped with adults [eg, studies in patients > or =12 years old] or not included [eg, studies of school-aged children < or =12 years old]). Attention should be given to standardizing variables that will permit comparison of outcomes between trials.

Maternal positive skin prick test results and asthma prediction after early childhood wheezing

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have used parental history of asthma or allergy but not positive skin prick test results to predict the evolution of asthma in wheezing infants.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether positive parental skin prick test results serve as a predictive factor for the subsequent development of asthma in a child with a history of wheezing before the age of 3 years.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study we investigated 91 individuals from 71 families. Enrollment criteria were age 6 to 40 years, history of wheezing before the age of 3 years, and no chronic lung disease other than asthma. Each participant was asked about current asthma-related symptoms, underwent pulmonary function testing, and underwent skin prick testing. Participants' parents underwent skin prick testing and measurement of total serum IgE levels.

RESULTS

Asthma was diagnosed in 56 participants (61%). Although maternal positive skin prick test results conferred a 3.4-fold risk of asthma (P = .02), neither the mother's nor the father's self-reported allergy or asthma was predictive of later development of asthma.

CONCLUSION

The presence of parental, and especially maternal, positive skin prick test results is a significant predictive factor for the subsequent development of asthma in early childhood wheezing.

[Fluticasone propionate in children and infants with asthma]

The known efficacy of fluticasone propionate in adults, comparable at half-dosage of corticosteroids has been validated by the market authorization (MA) and by the national and international guidelines for beclomethasone. This could be partly explained by its pharmacological properties, affinity for glucocorticosteroid receptors, lung deposition and lipophilicity. The limited systemic adverse events is due to its low bioavailability, optimal hepatic clearance, high plasma protein binding. The efficacy in asthmatic children has been confirmed in clinical studies showing a "plateau" efficacy between 100 and 200 microg/d for the majority of children. Most children are controlled by such dosages: the added value of increasing posology on asthma control exists but is small. A high off-label posology does not allow more quickly asthma control and therefore is not justified. A twice daily dosing is more efficient, particularly for initiation of maintenance therapy, than a once daily dosing. A literature survey confirms that, at MA recommended daily doses in children (100-200 microg), fluticasone propionate has no clinically significant effect either on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (basal function or stimulation tests), bone or growth velocity. However, high daily doses (higher to 500 microg/day) for long periods expose to systemic adverse effects with measurable consequences on growth rate, bone density (decreasing biochemical makers of bone formation) and HPA function. Several cases of adrenal insufficiency that may have led to acute adrenal crisis have been reported in 4- to 10-year-old children receiving fluticasone propionate in doses between 500 to 2000 microg daily. In case of surgery or infection, a preventive treatment of adrenal insufficiency with hydrocortisone should be proposed for children treated for more than 6 months with such high daily doses. Such children need definitely an advice from paediatricians specialized in chest diseases as well as in endocrinology. It is important to recall that the clinical benefit of daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids higher than recommended is low and that the good use of inhaled corticosteroids particularly in children lays on the careful search of the minimal efficient daily doses.

Twelve-month safety and efficacy of inhaled fluticasone propionate in children aged 1 to 3 years with recurrent wheezing

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare the 12-month safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP) and sodium cromoglycate (SCG) in children aged 1 to 3 years with mild to moderate recurrent wheeze.

METHODS

The study was a randomized, parallel-group, open-label multicenter study of 625 children, aged 1 to 3 years, with recurrent wheeze randomized in a 3:1 ratio to treatment for 52 weeks with FP (100 microg twice daily) via metered-dose inhaler and Babyhaler spacer device or SCG (5 mg 4 times daily) via metered-dose inhaler and Nebuhaler spacer device, respectively.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mean adjusted growth rates between the 2 groups: 84.0 mm/year in the FP group versus 86.4 mm/year in the SCG group (difference FP-SCG: -2.4 mm/year; 95% confidence interval: -6.6 to 1.8). Growth comparisons were independent of age, gender, previous use of steroid, or whether measured as length and/or height. Serum and urinary cortisol concentrations showed a statistically significant suppression of 10% and 14%, respectively, but the number of patients with serum cortisol levels below the lower normal limit was reduced during the trial. Both treatments were well tolerated. The most common drug-related adverse events were cough (2% FP vs 1% SCG) and hoarseness (1% FP vs 0% SCG). One incident of cataract was observed at baseline and 1 after FP treatment; the latter had resolved after 12 months. The efficacy of FP was superior to SCG with fewer cases of symptom worsening, exacerbations, and requirements for oral steroid treatment and more symptom-free days and days without use of rescue treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve months of treatment with inhaled FP (100 microg twice daily) in preschool children aged 1 to 3 years with recurrent wheeze has no effect on growth and no other clinically important side effects but is more efficacious than SCG.

Update of growth effects of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids

A small effect (approximately 1 cm) of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids on the 1 year growth of children with asthma and allergic rhinitis, respectively, has been reported in studies published during the past 10 years. Literature published during the past year confirmed the effect, but provided additional and novel information on the effects of longer-term (over 1 year) treatment, particularly with inhaled corticosteroids. This information is timely, because the longer-term effect size and duration were previously unknown, and the findings have major implications for the content of the safety discussion between caregivers and the parents of children with asthma or allergic rhinitis. The results of these studies provide very reassuring information about the longer-term safety of the use of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma. Limited evidence has also supported the notion that intranasal corticosteroids have no longer-term effects on growth. The possibility of an idiosyncratic (versus global) effect received conflicting support in recent literature. The risk of growth retardation can be lessened and managed by the employment of several simple strategies: (i) monitor growth; (ii) use minimal effective dose; and (iii) optimize steroid-sparing strategies. Communication with patients/parents about this possible side-effect, as well as the adverse consequences of the non-use of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids, is essential to minimize any possible negative impact on adherence. Children whose disease severity warrants inhaled or intranasal corticosteroid therapy should not be denied their benefits on the basis of this safety consideration.

Growth effects of asthma and asthma therapy

A small effect (1 cm) of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on the 1-year growth of asthmatic children was observed in studies published during the 1990s. A high volume of literature published during the past year confirmed mild growth suppression at one year, but provided information on the effects of longer-term treatment. These developments are important, since the effect was previously unknown and the findings have major implications for asthma caregivers and the communication that they have with asthmatic children and their parents. The possibility that this is an idiosyncratic effect received conflicting support. These studies collectively provide support for ICS use and ease the minds of caregivers, parents, and children. The risk of growth retardation can be lessened and managed by the employment of several simple strategies: (1) monitor growth; (2) use the minimal effective dose; (3) optimize steroid-sparing strategies (smoke and allergen environmental controls, vaccinate for influenza, diagnose and treat rhinitis, sinusitis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease, use add-on therapy with a second controller rather than doubling the ICS dose if control is inadequate); and (4) use spacing devices (for pressurized metered-dose inhalers) and mouth rinsing. Open and accurate communication with patients and parents about this possible effect is essential to minimize nonadherence. Ultimately, no child whose disease severity warrants ICS therapy should be denied the tremendous benefits that this therapy can provide because of relatively minor concerns about growth effects.