Comparison of montelukast versus budesonide in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Management of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Athletes

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a phenomenon observed in asthma but is also seen in healthy individuals and frequently in athletes. High prevalence rates are observed in athletes engaged in endurance sports, winter sports, and swimming. The pathophysiology of EIB is thought to be related to hyperventilation, cold air, and epithelial damage caused by chlorine and fine particles in inspired air. Several diagnostic procedures can be used; however, the diagnosis of EIB based on self-reported symptoms is not reliable and requires an objective examination. The hyperosmolar inhalation test and eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea test, which involve indirect stimulation of the airway, are useful for the diagnosis of EIB. A short-acting β-agonist is the first choice for prevention of EIB, and an inhaled corticosteroid is essential for patients with asthma. Furthermore, treatment should accommodate antidoping requirements in elite athletes. Tailoring of the therapeutic strategy to the individual case and the prognosis after cessation of athletic activity are issues that should be clarified in the future.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction update-2016

The first practice parameter on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was published in 2010. This updated practice parameter was prepared 5 years later. In the ensuing years, there has been increased understanding of the pathogenesis of EIB and improved diagnosis of this disorder by using objective testing. At the time of this publication, observations included the following: dry powder mannitol for inhalation as a bronchial provocation test is FDA approved however not currently available in the United States; if baseline pulmonary function test results are normal to near normal (before and after bronchodilator) in a person with suspected EIB, then further testing should be performed by using standardized exercise challenge or eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH); and the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions (omega-3 fatty acids) has been challenged. The workgroup preparing this practice parameter updated contemporary practice guidelines based on a current systematic literature review. The group obtained supplementary literature and consensus expert opinions when the published literature was insufficient. A search of the medical literature on PubMed was conducted, and search terms included pathogenesis, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and therapy (both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical) of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction or exercise-induced asthma (which is no longer a preferred term); asthma; and exercise and asthma. References assessed as relevant to the topic were evaluated to search for additional relevant references. Published clinical studies were appraised by category of evidence and used to document the strength of the recommendation. The parameter was then evaluated by Joint Task Force reviewers and then by reviewers assigned by the parent organizations, as well as the general membership. Based on this process, the parameter can be characterized as an evidence- and consensus-based document.

Asthma phenotypes: the intriguing selective intervention with Montelukast

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, usually characterized by chronic airway inflammation and a variable course associated with various underlying mechanisms that can differ between individuals. Patients with asthma can therefore exhibit different phenotypes, a term used to define the observable characteristics of an organism resulting from the interaction between its genetic makeup and the environment. The heterogeneity of asthma has received a large amount of attention in the last few years in order to better tailor treatment according to the different clinical and biological phenotypes of the disease. Specific asthma phenotypes may require an approach to treatment sometimes different from that recommended by current guidelines, so a personalized approach to asthma pharmacotherapy is recommended. Growing evidence suggests that leukotrienes play an important role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma. The mechanisms of action of leukotriene-receptor antagonists theoretically predict a good response in some asthma “phenotypes”.In this article we have performed an analysis of the recent literature (controlled clinical trials and real-life studies) about a possible selective intervention with Montelukast in specific asthma phenotypes.

Do children with stable asthma benefit from addition of montelukast to inhaled corticosteroids: randomized, placebo controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To determine the effects of montelukast added to maintenance inhaled steroids (ICS) therapy during the school year in children with stable asthma on the ICS use, frequency of exacerbations, lung function, asthma symptoms, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) level and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

METHODS

Seventy six asthmatic children aged 6-14 years, allergic to house dust mites were randomized to a double-blinded trial comparing montelukast therapy to a matching placebo. We studied following end-points: the reduction in the ICS dose, the frequency of exacerbations, lung function, asthma control test score, and the change from baseline in FEV1 during a standardized exercise treadmill challenge. ICS dose was adjusted in a stepwise fashion to determine the lowest dose necessary to control asthma symptoms.

RESULTS

We showed that children with baseline value of FeNO above 31 ppb and well controlled asthma symptoms on low doses of ICS, benefit the most from additive therapy with montelukast; their cumulative ICS dose is lower than in children treated with ICS only. Also, the addition of montelukast to regular treatment in asthmatic children resulted in a significant reduction in the frequency of exacerbations and EIB protection.

CONCLUSION

It is reasonable to add montelukast to ICS therapy in asthmatic children during the school year, to lower cumulative ICS dose in children with well controlled asthma symptoms, as well as to reduce number of exacerbations, and to achieve better control of EIB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01266772.

Impact of montelukast on asthma associated with rhinitis, and other triggers and co-morbidities

INTRODUCTION

Rhinitis and other specific triggers or co-morbidities (tobacco exposure, excess weight, aspirin sensitivity or heredity factors) are frequently associated with uncontrolled asthma. Asthma associated with these exacerbating factors appears to be related to an increase in leukotriene-mediated inflammation.

METHODS

We reviewed the role of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in the treatment of asthma associated with these factors by using the PubMed database to search the English and French biomedical literature for articles describing randomized-controlled trials, large observational studies and reviews (published up to May 2012, inclusive).

RESULTS

Montelukast, either alone or in combination with other drugs, is an effective treatment against rhinitis-associated asthma. Montelukast also offers therapeutic benefits against exercise-induced asthma or in cases of asthma linked to tobacco exposure, excess weight or aspirin hypersensitivity. Thus, for some patients, montelukast may constitute an alternative to the gold-standard treatment of inhaled corticosteroids. Polymorphisms in several genes encoding proteins of the leukotriene signaling pathway may contribute to the variability in response to montelukast.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we have shown that montelukast treatment could be of particular benefit to subgroups of patients with asthma associated with rhinitis, exercise, tobacco exposure, being overweight or aspirin hypersensitivity.

Tissue accumulation kinetics of ciclesonide-active metabolite and budesonide in mice

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are mainstay treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, highly lipophilic ICS accumulate in systemic tissues, which may lead to adverse systemic effects. The accumulation of a new, highly lipophilic ICS, ciclesonide and its active metabolite (des-CIC) has not yet been reported. Here, we have compared tissue accumulation of des-CIC and an ICS of a moderate lipophilicity, budesonide (BUD), after 14 days of once-daily treatment in mice. Single, three or 14 daily doses of [(3) H]-des-CIC or [(3) H]-BUD were administered subcutaneously to male CD1 albino mice, which were killed at 4 hr, 24 hr or 5 days after the last dose. Distribution of tissue concentration of radioactivity was studied by quantitative whole-body autoradiography. Pattern of radioactivity distribution across most tissues was similar for both corticosteroids after a single as well as after repeated dosing. However, tissue concentration of radioactivity differed between des-CIC and BUD. After a single dose, concentrations of radioactivity for both corticosteroids were low for most tissues but increased over 14 days of daily dosing. The tissue radioactivity of des-CIC at 24 hr and 5 days after the 14th dose was 2-3 times higher than that of BUD in majority of tissues. Tissue accumulation, assessed as concentration of tissue radioactivity 5 days after the 14th versus 3rd dose, showed an average ratio of 5.2 for des-CIC and 2.7 for BUD (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, des-CIC accumulated significantly more than BUD. Systemic accumulation may lead to increased risk of adverse systemic side effects during long-term therapy.

Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Anti-leukotrienes (5-lipoxygenase inhibitors and leukotriene receptors antagonists) serve as alternative monotherapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and efficacy of anti-leukotrienes compared to inhaled corticosteroids as monotherapy in adults and children with asthma and to provide better insight into the influence of patient and treatment characteristics on the magnitude of effects.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1966 to Dec 2010), EMBASE (1980 to Dec 2010), CINAHL (1982 to Dec 2010), the Cochrane Airways Group trials register, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Dec 2010), abstract books, and reference lists of review articles and trials. We contacted colleagues and the international headquarters of anti-leukotrienes producers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials that compared anti-leukotrienes with inhaled corticosteroids as monotherapy for a minimum period of four weeks in patients with asthma aged two years and older.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the methodological quality of trials and extracted data. The primary outcome was the number of patients with at least one exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids. Secondary outcomes included patients with at least one exacerbation requiring hospital admission, lung function tests, indices of chronic asthma control, adverse effects, withdrawal rates and biological inflammatory markers.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five trials met the inclusion criteria for this review. Fifty-six trials (19 paediatric trials) contributed data (representing total of 10,005 adults and 3,333 children); 21 trials were of high methodological quality; 44 were published in full-text. All trials pertained to patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma. Trial durations varied from four to 52 weeks. The median dose of inhaled corticosteroids was quite homogeneous at 200 µg/day of microfine hydrofluoroalkane-propelled beclomethasone or equivalent (HFA-BDP eq). Patients treated with anti-leukotrienes were more likely to suffer an exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids (N = 6077 participants; risk ratio (RR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17, 1.96). For every 28 (95% CI 15 to 82) patients treated with anti-leukotrienes instead of inhaled corticosteroids, there was one additional patient with an exacerbation requiring rescue systemic corticosteroids. The magnitude of effect was significantly greater in patients with moderate compared with those with mild airway obstruction (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.41, 2.91 versus RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.97, 1.61), but was not significantly influenced by age group (children representing 23% of the weight versus adults), anti-leukotriene used, duration of intervention, methodological quality, and funding source. Significant group differences favouring inhaled corticosteroids were noted in most secondary outcomes including patients with at least one exacerbation requiring hospital admission (N = 2715 participants; RR 3.33; 95% CI 1.02 to 10.94), the change from baseline FEV(1) (N = 7128 participants; mean group difference (MD) 110 mL, 95% CI 140 to 80) as well as other lung function parameters, asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, rescue medication use, symptom-free days, the quality of life, parents' and physicians' satisfaction. Anti-leukotriene therapy was associated with increased risk of withdrawals due to poor asthma control (N = 7669 participants; RR 2.56; 95% CI 2.01 to 3.27). For every thirty one (95% CI 22 to 47) patients treated with anti-leukotrienes instead of inhaled corticosteroids, there was one additional withdrawal due to poor control. Risk of side effects was not significantly different between both groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

As monotherapy, inhaled corticosteroids display superior efficacy to anti-leukotrienes in adults and children with persistent asthma; the superiority is particularly marked in patients with moderate airway obstruction. On the basis of efficacy, the results support the current guidelines' recommendation that inhaled corticosteroids remain the preferred monotherapy. 

Time-effect of montelukast on protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

INTRODUCTION

Montelukast has been proven to assure a protective effect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

AIM

To verify exactly when montelukast begins protection in asthmatic children by evaluating different time intervals between dosing and challenge.

METHODS

In a double blind, placebo-controlled, three day doses, crossover study, patients were randomized to receive in sequence treatment with either a placebo or montelukast and assigned to one of seven groups that were tested 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 h after drug administration, respectively. For each group, the exercise challenge was always performed at the same hour on the first and third days of treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine asthmatic children took part in the study. On day 3, the mean FEV(1) % fall from baseline was 25.54 (95% CI = 21.63/29.46) and 14.89 (95% CI = 11.85/17.92) for the placebo and active drug (p < 0.05), respectively. On day 1, the mean fall of FEV(1) was 28.20 (95% CI = 24.46/31.94) and 19.01 (95% CI = 15.71/22.31) for the placebo and montelukast (p < 0.05), respectively. Clinical protection was achieved in 21 (30%) and 33 (48%) subjects by montelukast on the first and third days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast assured protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction from the first through the eighth hour from the first day of treatment. However, individual susceptibility to protection was evident since some individuals were not protected at any time. We conclude that in clinical use individual responses to the drug should be carefully evaluated in the follow-up management.

Exercise-induced asthma in children

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction affects 40-90% of people with asthma, compared with 3-15% of the general population. Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) is diagnosed on the basis of subjective symptoms of airflow obstruction during and after exercise, objective measures of airflow obstruction and the exclusion of alternative diagnoses. Although the pathogenesis of EIA has not been fully elucidated, two major theories have been proposed: the airway rewarming theory and the hyperosmolarity theory. Increasing evidence suggests that airway inflammation plays a major role in the pathogenesis of EIA. In this article, we review the prevalence, pathogenesis, methods for diagnosis and treatment of EIA, as well as the responsiveness of children and adolescents to EIA therapies.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children: a comparative systematic review of the available treatment options

The aim of this article is to critically review the efficacy and safety data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), long- or short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs, SABAs), parasympatholytics and oral leukotriene receptor antagonists in the management of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children with persistent asthma (EIA). The studies with sufficient information on patient characteristics and outcomes were chosen using a MEDLINE search. Results from the individual searches were combined and repeated. Studies were also found by reviewing the reference lists of the articles not included in this review. Studies focusing solely on individuals with asthma and other allergic co-morbidities (i.e. a degree of bronchial reversibility) were considered in this review. To make the paper evidence-based, the design and the quality of different studies were assessed employing the Sign criteria (evidence level [EL] and grades of recommendation [GR]). No additional statistical analyses were performed. Most of studies included paediatric patients with underlying EIA. We need to distinguish children with recurrent asthma symptoms in whom EIB is also present (patients with EIA) from asthmatic subjects whose symptoms appear only as a result of exercise (patients with EIB). Further controller treatment is indicated in patients with EIA and further reliever treatment in patients with EIB. ICSs are the first-choice controller drugs for EIA in children with persistent asthma (Sign grade of recommendation [GR]:A). In children with EIA without complete control with ICSs, SABAs (GR:A), leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) [GR:A] or LABAs (GR:A) may be added to gain control. Treatment with relievers such as SABAs (GR:A), parasympatholytics (GR:B) or, eventually, LABAs (GR:A), administered 10-15 minutes before exercise is the most preferable method of preventing EIB symptoms in children; however, not as monotherapy in children with EIA. The disadvantages and controversy relating to inhaled beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist use lie in the development of tolerance to their effect when they are used on a regular basis, and the possibility of a resulting underuse of ICSs in patients with EIA. Researchers and guidelines recommend that if any patient requires treatment with a beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist more than twice weekly, a low dose of ICSs should be administered. Inhaled parasympatholytics may be effective as preventive relievers in some children with EIB or EIA, especially among those with increased vagal activity. LTRAs have a well balanced efficacy-safety profile in preventing the occurrence of EIB symptoms in children. Compared with LABAs, LTRAs produce persistent attenuation of EIB and possess an additional effect with rescue SABA therapy in persistent asthmatic patients with EIA. A disadvantage of LTRAs is a non-response phenomenon. There are still insufficient data on the efficacy-safety profiles of ICS/LABA combination drugs in the treatment of EIA in children to recommend this treatment without caution. Safety profiles of inhaled SABAs, anticholinergics and montelukast in approved dosages seem sufficient enough to recommend use of these drugs in the prevention of EIB symptoms in children. Many researchers agree that treatment of EIA in children should always be individualized.

Exercise-induced asthma: critical analysis of the protective role of montelukast

Exercise-induced asthma/exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIA/EIB) is a prevalent and clinically important disease affecting young children through older adulthood. These terms are often used interchangeably and the differences are not clearly defined in the literature. The pathogenesis of EIA/EIB may be different in those with persistent asthma compared to those with exercise-induced symptoms only. The natural history of EIA is unclear and may be different for elite athletes. Leukotriene biology has helped the understanding of EIB. The type and intensity of exercise are important factors for EIB. Exercise participation is necessary for proper development and control of EIA is recommended. Symptoms of EIB should be confirmed by proper testing. Biologic markers may also be helpful in diagnosis. Not all exercise symptoms are from EIB. Many medication and nonpharmacologic treatments are available. Asthma education is an important component of managing EIA. Many medications have been tested and the comparisons are complicated. Montelukast is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved asthma and EIB controller and has a number of potential advantages to other asthma medications including short onset of action, ease of use, and lack of tolerance. Not all patients improve with montelukast and rescue medication should be available.

Exercise-induced bronchospasm in children

This review will encompass definition, history, epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of exercise -induced bronchospasm in the pediatric individual with and without known asthma. Exercise induced asthma is the conventional term for transient airway narrowing in a known asthma in association with strenuous exercise usually lasting 5-10 minutes with a decline in pulmonary function by at least 10%. Exercise induced asthma will be referred to as exercise induced bronchospasm in an asthmatic. Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB ) is the same phenomenon in an individual without known asthma. EIB can be seen in healthy individuals including children as well as defense recruits and competitive or elite athletes. The diagnosis with objective exercise challenge methods in conjunction with history is delineated. Management is characterized with pharmacotherapy and non pharmacotherapeutic measures for underlying asthma as well as exercise induced bronchospasm and inhalant allergy. Children can successfully participate in all sports if asthma is properly managed.

Comparative study of budesonide inhalation suspension and montelukast in young children with mild persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Budesonide inhalation suspension and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast have demonstrated efficacy in children with mild persistent asthma, but comparative long-term studies in young children are needed.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of budesonide inhalation suspension and montelukast.

METHODS

After a run-in period, children 2 to 8 years old with mild asthma or recurrent wheezing were randomized to once-daily budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 mg or once-daily oral montelukast 4 or 5 mg for 52 weeks. Subjects were stepped up to twice-daily budesonide inhalation suspension or oral corticosteroids for mild or severe asthma worsening, respectively. The primary outcome was time to first additional medication for asthma worsening at 52 weeks. Secondary variables included times to the first additional asthma medication measured at 12 and 26 weeks; times to the first asthma exacerbation (mild and severe) measured at 12, 26, and 52 weeks; exacerbation rates (mild and severe) over a period of 52 weeks; diary variables (eg, peak expiratory flow [PEF]); patient-reported outcomes; and Global Physician and Caregiver Assessments.

RESULTS

No significant between-group differences were observed for time to first additional asthma medication at 52 weeks; however, time to first additional asthma medication was longer (unadjusted P = .050) at 12 weeks and exacerbation rates were lower over a period of 52 weeks (unadjusted P = .034) for budesonide versus montelukast. Time to first severe exacerbation (requiring oral corticosteroids) was similar in both groups, but the percentage of subjects requiring oral corticosteroids over a period of 52 weeks was lower with budesonide (25.5% vs 32.0%). Peak flow and Caregiver and Physician Global Assessments favored budesonide.

CONCLUSION

Both treatments provided acceptable asthma control; however, overall measures favored budesonide inhalation suspension over montelukast.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These findings are consistent with studies in older children demonstrating better outcomes with inhaled corticosteroids versus montelukast.

An evaluation of levalbuterol HFA in the prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm

Background

Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) affects up to 90% of all patients with asthma.

Objective

This study evaluated the ability of levalbuterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 90 μg (two actuations of 45 μg) administered via metered dose inhaler (MDI) to protect against EIB in mild-to-moderate asthmatics.

Methods

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way cross-over study. Patients with asthma (n = 15) were ≥18 years, had a ≥6-month history of EIB, ≥70% baseline predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁), and a 20% to 50% decrease in FEV₁ after treadmill exercise challenge using single-blind placebo MDI. Levalbuterol or placebo was self-administered 30 minutes before exercise. Treatment sequences were separated by a 3-to 7-day washout period. Spirometry was performed predose, 20 minutes postdose/pre-exercise, and 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-exercise. The primary endpoint was the maximum percent decrease in FEV₁ from baseline (postdose/pre-exercise). The percentage of protected (≤20% decrease in post-exercise FEV₁) patients was also assessed.

Results

Levalbuterol had significantly smaller maximum percent post-exercise decrease in FEV₁ compared with placebo (LS mean ± SE; −4.8% ± 2.8% versus −22.5% ± 2.8%, respectively). For levalbuterol, 14/15 (93.3%) patients had <20% decrease in post-exercise FEV₁ compared with 8/15 (53.3%) for placebo (p = 0.0143). Treatment was well tolerated.

Conclusion

Levalbuterol HFA MDI (90 μg) administered 30 minutes before exercise was significantly more effective than placebo in protecting against EIB after a single exercise challenge and was well tolerated.

Clinical Implications

Levalbuterol HFA MDI when administered before exercise was effective in protecting adults with asthma from EIB.

Effect of different antiasthmatic treatments on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction occurs in a large proportion of children with asthma, limiting everyday activities important for their physical and social development.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to compare the ability of different patterns of antiasthmatic treatment, recommended in childhood asthma, to protect patients from exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

Children 6 to 18 years of age with atopic asthma were randomized to a 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Patients were randomly allocated to receive daily 200 microg budesonide (twice daily, 100 microg per dose) + 9 microg formoterol (twice daily, 4.5 microg per dose; n = 20); 200 microg budesonide + 5 or 10 mg montelukast (once daily at bedtime; n = 20); 5 or 10 mg montelukast (n = 20); 200 microg budesonide (n = 20); or placebo (n = 20). A standardized treadmill exercise challenge was performed before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, reflected by area under the curve for the FEV1 values from exercise over the 20-minute period and by maximum percent fall in FEV1 after exercise, was significantly diminished after 4 weeks in all active treatment groups, and compared with placebo. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction protection improved more significantly in the budesonide + montelukast and montelukast groups compared with other therapeutic options.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate differences in effects on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction between therapeutic options recommended in childhood asthma. Control of childhood asthma with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction can be obtained by using regular controller treatment.

Update on montelukast and its role in the treatment of asthma, allergic rhinitis and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Montelukast sodium (Singulair, Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ) is a selective and orally-active leukotriene receptor antagonist with demonstrated effectiveness for treating allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis in adults and children as young as 12 months of age for allergic asthma and 6 months of age for allergic rhinitis. It was recently approved in the US for prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients who are > or = 15 years of age. This paper updates a prior review of the data on the clinical efficacy of montelukast published in this journal.

Inhaled corticosteroids compared to placebo for prevention of exercise induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of exercise induced bronchoconstriction is likely multifactorial and is not completely understood. Inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of exercise induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects but the evidence seems less strong in non-asthmatic subjects. The management of exercise induced bronchoconstriction focuses on prevention, through both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to evaluate the use of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of exercise induced bronchoconstriction in a systematic way. Specifically, the review was designed to: determine whether inhaled corticosteroids (compared to placebo) has an attenuating effect on exercise induced bronchoconstriction in adult and pediatric asthmatic patients; estimate the magnitude of the attenuating effect.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Review Group Specialised Register of trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, review articles, textbooks and reference list of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in adults or children comparing inhaled corticosteroids with placebo to prevent bronchoconstriction in patients with exercise induced bronchoconstriction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality assessment and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

The results from six randomised controlled trials involving 123 participants were analyzed (two trials involving adults and four involving children). Combining results from the two parallel studies with at least 4 weeks duration of inhaled corticosteroids, the use of inhaled corticosteroids significantly attenuated the percent fall index in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (WMD = 14.07%; 95% CI: 11.62% to 16.52%). The result from one crossover study with duration of inhaled corticosteroids of 4 weeks revealed significant attenuation of percent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second ( WMD = 6.90%; 95% CI: 1.40% to 12.40%) and the percent fall in peak expiratory flow ( WMD =11.50%; 95% CI: 6.31% to 16.69%). The small amount of data from placebo-controlled trials using a single treatment do not currently allow conclusions to be drawn.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled corticosteroids used for 4 weeks or more before exercise testing significantly attenuated exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The relative benefits of inhaled corticosteroids compared to other forms of exercise induced bronchoconstriction treatment (sodium cromoglycate, nedocromil sodium, salbutamol, and other anti-inflammatory agents) remains unclear.

Effect of ciclesonide dose and duration of therapy on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroid therapy improves exercise symptoms in asthmatic subjects.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) as a method of determining the dose and time responses of inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, cross-over study with 2 parallel arms, 4 doses of inhaled ciclesonide (40 microg and 160 microg or 80 microg and 320 microg) were compared over 3 weeks of treatment. Twenty-six asthmatic subjects (age range, 14-27 years) with baseline FEV1 values of greater than 70% of predicted value were enrolled. The primary outcome was the maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 after standardized exercise challenge.

RESULTS

After 1 week of therapy, the mean +/- SEM reduction in maximum decrease in FEV1 in the ciclesonide 40-microg/80-microg dose group was 9% +/- 2.6% (95% CI, 3.9% to 14%), with no additional reduction thereafter. In the ciclesonide 160-microg/320-microg dose group, there was an 8.7% +/- 2.5% (95% CI, 3.7% to 13.7%) reduction in maximum decrease in FEV1 after week 1, which continued in a linear fashion during subsequent weeks of treatment. No difference was found between the 2 treatment arms in the temporal response of EIB to ciclesonide treatment. The maximum percentage attenuation in EIB achieved was 51.1% +/- 7.9%, which was achieved by using the 320-microg dose after 3 weeks of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant improvement in EIB was demonstrated for all doses of ciclesonide. Use of 160 microg/320 microg of ciclesonide resulted in a continuing improvement in FEV1 with time, and no plateau was seen in protective effect during 3 weeks of treatment.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Attenuation in exercise-induced decrease can be seen as early as after 1 week of therapy with inhaled ciclesonide at doses greater than 40 microg. However, maximal attenuation in exercise response continues to increase at doses greater than or equal to 200 microg, even after 3 weeks of therapy.

Advances in the management of pediatric asthma: a review of recent FDA drug approvals and label updates

Children have the highest prevalence of asthma of any age group. In the United States during 2001, there were 12.6 million physician and hospital outpatient visits for asthma treatment, of which almost 5 million involved children 18 years and younger. Therapeutic advances in pediatric asthma could improve patient outcomes and potentially reduce the burden on health care systems. Efforts to obtain efficacy and safety data in pediatric populations and develop pediatric formulations of asthma treatments have been encouraged by the FDA and clinicians. This article reviews the newest additions to asthma therapies approved for use in children, including an inhaled corticosteroid, some long-acting beta2-agonists, some leukotriene-receptor blockers, and a single-isomer, short-acting beta2-agonist.

Role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: a review

Asthma is a very common disorder that still causes significant morbidity and mortality. A high percentage of individuals with asthma also experience exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). This article reviews the current literature and updates the reader on the safety, efficacy, and clinical applications of leukotriene modifiers in the treatment of EIB.

Asthma associated with exercise

Exercise is a potent stimulus to asthma. The diagnosis is not always straightforward, and health care providers should have a high index of suspicion. Treatment usually controls exercise-induced asthma but usually requires therapy tailored for each individual patient.

Effect of fluticasone/salmeterol administered via a single device on exercise-induced bronchospasm in patients with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Exercise is a common trigger of asthma symptoms in patients with persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the protective effect of fluticasone/salmeterol against exercise-induced bronchospasm.

METHODS

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial of 192 asthma patients who used moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Patients (aged 12-50 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], 78% of predicted at baseline) were randomized to receive fluticasone/salmeterol (250/50 microg twice daily) or fluticasone alone (250 microg twice daily) via Diskus for 4 weeks. Exercise challenge tests were performed 1 and 8.5 hours after administration of the first (day 1) and last (week 4) doses of blinded study medication.

RESULTS

On day 1 and at week 4, mean +/- SEM values for the maximal percentage decline in FEV1 1 hour after drug administration were 11.4% +/- 1.5% and 10.9% +/- 1.5% for fluticasone/salmeterol compared with 20.0% +/- 1.7% and 18.4% +/- 1.8% for fluticasone (P < .001). At 8.5 hours, mean +/- SEM values on day 1 and at week 4 were 11.6% +/- 1.4% and 8.9% +/1.1%, respectively, for fluticasone/salmeterol and 12.6% +/- 1.6% and 12.9% +/- 1.4%, respectively, for fluticasone (P = .01 at week 4). More fluticasone-treated patients did not complete the 8.5-hour exercise challenges (36% on day 1 and 33% at week 4) compared with the fluticasone/salmeterol group (18% each) (P < or = .01). Improvements in peak expiratory flow rate and albuterol rescue-free days were significantly greater with fluticasone/salmeterol vs fluticasone over weeks 1 to 4 (P < or = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with the improvements in other measures of asthma control, long-term fluticasone/salmeterol therapy also provided protection against exercise-induced bronchospasm in patients with persistent asthma.

Management of exercise-induced bronchospasm in children: the role of leukotriene antagonists

This review assesses the evidence on the efficacy of leukotriene antagonists in the management of exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) in children. Only two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies have examined the effect of leukotriene antagonists in EIB in a pediatric setting. All other studies, including those comparing leukotriene antagonists with other agents such as beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists) and inhaled corticosteroids, primarily involve adult patients. In children, not receiving other asthma medication, leukotriene antagonists can offer statistically significant protection from EIB compared with placebo. However, protection is not complete, as a significant proportion of children will continue to experience a >15% reduction in FEV(1). None of the studies involved children treated concurrently with other asthma medications; therefore, comments on additive therapy cannot be made. Despite evidence from only a few studies, leukotriene antagonists are seen to be well tolerated, efficacious, and of benefit to some children. In addition, current management for EIB with short-acting beta(2)-agonists is less than ideal. It is therefore concluded that in children with EIB, leukotriene antagonists are indicated on a trial basis with individualized therapy and follow-up to evaluate treatment response.

Recent advances in the management of asthma using leukotriene modifiers

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that affects approximately 100 million people worldwide. In order to reduce symptoms, improve pulmonary function, and decrease morbidity, current treatment guidelines emphasize the importance of controlling the underlying inflammation in patients with asthma. Leukotrienes are leukocyte-generated lipid mediators that promote airway inflammation. Recognition of the importance of leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of asthma has led to the development of leukotriene modifiers, the first new class of drugs for the treatment of asthma to become available in 25 years. Controlled clinical trials with the four currently used leukotriene modifiers (montelukast, zafirlukast, and zileuton in the US and pranlukast in Japan) have established their efficacy in improving pulmonary function, reducing symptoms, decreasing night-time awakenings, and decreasing the need for rescue medications. They exert anti-inflammatory effects that attenuate cellular infiltration and bronchial hyperresponsiveness and complement the anti-inflammatory properties of inhaled corticosteroids. In patients with moderate and severe asthma, they permit tapering of the corticosteroid dose. In patients with exercise-induced asthma, leukotriene modifiers limit the decline in and quicken the recovery of pulmonary functions without the tolerance issues seen with chronic long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist use. In patients with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)-induced asthma, they improve pulmonary function and shift the dose response curve to the right, reducing the patient's response to aspirin. In patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, with or without concomitant asthma, they improve nasal, eye, and throat symptoms as well as quality of life. Leukotriene modifiers are generally safe and well tolerated with adverse effect profiles similar to that of placebo. The one safety issue raised with leukotriene modifiers, Churg-Strauss Syndrome, appears to be the unmasking of an already present syndrome that is manifested when the leukotriene modifiers permit corticosteroid doses to be reduced. Although current treatment guidelines recommend their use in patients with mild persistent asthma, these guidelines were developed just as leukotriene modifiers were coming to the market, before much of the clinical efficacy data were published. Because asthma is a heterogeneous disease, the different asthma phenotypes respond differently to therapies; consequently asthma therapy needs to be individualized. Leukotriene modifiers increase the therapeutic options for patients with asthma and, based on recent data, it is expected that future guidelines will describe expanded uses for these agents in clinical circumstances where these drugs are effective.

Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Anti-leukotrienes agents are currently being studied as alternative first line agents to inhaled corticosteroids in mild to moderate chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy of anti-leukotriene agents with inhaled glucocorticoids (ICS) and to determine the dose-equivalence of anti-leukotrienes to daily dose of ICS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (1966 to Aug 2003), EMBASE (1980 to Aug 2003), CINAHL (1982 to Aug 2003), the Cochrane Airways Group trials register, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (August 2003), abstract books, and reference lists of review articles and trials. We contacted colleagues and international headquarters of anti-leukotrienes producers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials that compared anti-leukotrienes with inhaled corticosteroids during a minimal 30-day intervention period in asthmatic patients aged 2 years and older.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality or trials and extracted trial data. The primary outcome was the rate of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids. Secondary outcomes included lung function, indices of chronic asthma control, adverse effects and withdrawal rates.

MAIN RESULTS

27 trials (including 1 trial testing two protocols) met the inclusion criteria; 13 were of high methodological quality; 20 are published in full-text. All trials pertained to patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Only 3 trials focused on children and adolescents. Trial duration varied from 4 to 37 weeks. In most trials, daily dose of ICS was 400 mcg of beclomethasone or equivalent. Patients treated with anti-leukotrienes were 65% more likely to suffer an exacerbation requiring systemic steroids [Relative Risk 1.65; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.36 to 2.00]. Twenty six (95% CI: 17 to 47) patients must be treated with anti-leukotrienes instead of inhaled corticosteroids to cause one extra exacerbation. Significant differences favouring ICS were noted in secondary outcomes where()the improvement in FEV(1) reached 130 mL [13 trials; 95% CI: 50, 140 mL ]. Other significant benefits of ICS were seen for symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, rescue medication use, symptom-free days, and quality of life. Anti-leukotriene therapy was associated with 160% increased risk of withdrawals due to poor asthma control. Twenty nine (95% CI 20 to 48) patients must be treated with anti-leukotrienes instead of inhaled corticosteroids to cause one extra withdrawal due to poor control. Risk of side effects was not different between groups.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled steroids at a dose of 400 mcg/day of beclomethasone or equivalent are more effective than anti-leukotriene agents given in the usual licensed doses. The exact dose-equivalence of anti-leukotriene agents in mcg of ICS remains to be determined. Inhaled glucocorticoids should remain the first line monotherapy for persistent asthma.

Addition of anti-leukotriene agents to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Anti-leukotriene (AL) agents are being considered as 'add-on' therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the safety and efficacy of daily AL plus ICS compared to ICS alone, and determine the corticosteroid-sparing effect of AL when added to ICS in chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL (until August 2003), reference lists of review articles and trials, contacted international headquarters of AL manufacturers and looked at American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society meeting abstracts (1998 to 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled trials of asthmatics aged two years and older with at least one month intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed quality and extracted data independently. Trials were grouped by asthma control at baseline (symptomatic or well-controlled) and dose of ICS in the control group (same or double).

MAIN RESULTS

Of 587 citations, 27 (25 adult and 2 paediatric) trials met inclusion criteria. Sixteen trials were published in full-text and 16 trials reported data in a way that allowed meta-analysis. In symptomatic patients, addition of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes to ICS resulted in a non-significant reduction in the risk of exacerbations requiring systemic steroids: Relative Risk (RR) 0.64; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.38 to 1.07). A modest improvement group difference in PEF was seen (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 7.7 L/min; 95% CI 3.6 to 11.8 L/min) together with decrease in use of rescue short-acting beta2-agonist use (WMD 1 puff/week; 95%CI 0.5 to 2). With only 3 trials comparing the use of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes with increasing the dose of inhaled glucocorticoids, no firm conclusion can be drawn about the equivalence of both treatment options. In ICS-sparing studies of patients who were well controlled at baseline, addition of anti-leukotrienes produced no overall difference in dose of inhaled glucocorticoids (WMD -21 mcg/d, 95%CI -65, 23 mcg/d), but it was associated with fewer withdrawals due to poor asthma control (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.95).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

The addition of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes to add-on therapy to inhaled glucocorticoids brings modest improvement in lung function. Although addition of anti-leukotrienes to inhaled glucocorticoids appears comparable to increasing the dose of inhaled steroids, the power of the review is insufficient to confirm the equivalence of both treatment options. Addition of anti-leukotrienes is associated with superior asthma control after glucocorticoid tapering; although the glucocorticoid-sparing effect cannot be quantified at present, it appears modest.

Improved ability to perform strenuous activities after treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination in patients with persistent asthma

Patients with asthma experience disruptions in usual activities that can impair their quality of life, and in patients whose daily routine involves an active lifestyle, these disruptions can be severe. We assessed the patient-perceived effect of treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination (FSC), compared with fluticasone propionate (FP) or salmeterol (SAL) alone, on activity limitations, particularly strenuous physical activities. The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) was administered in two 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials comparing FSC 100/50 or 250/50 microg twice daily vs. the individual components alone in 686 adults and adolescents with asthma. In one study, patients were stratified by prior treatment [low to medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or SAL], and in the other study, all patients were previously treated with medium to high doses of ICS. Patients prospectively identified five activities they performed regularly and were asked how these activities were limited by their asthma. The effect of randomized treatment on strenuous activities (e.g., aerobics, cycling, hiking, and basketball) was assessed. In both studies, treatment with FSC resulted in clinically meaningful improvements (i.e., change in AQLQ of > or = 0.5) and was statistically significantly better than SAL in both studies and FP in one study. Treatment of the two main components of asthma--inflammation and bronchoconstriction--with FSC results in clinically meaningful improvements in the ability of patients with persistent asthma to perform not only their usual activities but also strenuous activities.

Review of exercise-induced asthma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this manuscript is to review the recent literature on exercise-induced asthma (EIA) and summarize the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of this condition.

METHOD

A review of the English language medical literature was performed to obtain articles on EIA.

RESULTS

The pathophysiology of EIA is not fully understood, but there are two theories: 1) the hyperosmolar theory and 2) the airway rewarming theory. In addition, there have been data to show that airway inflammation is present in some elite athletes, especially in cold weather sports. The diagnosis of EIA is usually straightforward in most patients, but a number of patients may have atypical symptoms and may be more difficult to diagnose. They may well need exercise testing or eucapnic voluntary ventilation testing. Most people respond to treatment with an inhaled beta agonist and or cromolyn before exercise, but some patients will also need other medications, including daily medications such as inhaled steroids. When treatment does not control the problem, then further diagnostic evaluation should be done to rule out conditions other than EIA, such as vocal cord dysfunction or cardiac or pulmonary problems.

CONCLUSIONS

EIA is a condition that may occur in schoolchildren in gym class and also in Olympic athletes. The diagnosis and treatment is usually fairly straightforward, but at times it may be challenging. However, all patients should be followed to make sure that the correct diagnosis is made and to make sure that treatment is effective.

Role of budesonide as maintenance therapy for children with asthma

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways. Inhaled corticosteroids are recognized as the preferred long-term control medication for persistent asthma based on their anti-inflammatory properties and significant evidence of efficacy. Inhaled budesonide is the most carefully characterized inhaled corticosteroid for childhood asthma. It is available for administration in children down to six months of age and to date has an excellent safety profile.

Activity-induced asthma

Exercise is the most common trigger of persistent childhood asthma. The history for EIA can be complicated by the lack of perception of significant airway obstruction during exercise. One must carefully identify those children with EIA from the group of children who report low level of activity because of lack of interest or because they are out of shape. Baseline spirometry of children with persistent asthma is frequently normal. Spirometry is important to identify those children with EIA who underrecognize their disease, but normal results should not be used as evidence of absence of disease. Formal exercise testing should be considered when the diagnosis is unclear or if there seems to be a lack of bronchoprotection with inhaled albuterol. The goal of treatment of EIA should be the attainment of a normal activity level for children and adolescents. Identification of the limits imposed by EIA and establishment of goals of therapy with the child and family should be the initial action. Inactivity or reduced exertion, in the presence of this diagnosis. should not be accepted. Therapy for EIA starts with control of the underlying persistent asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are the most effective initial treatment of both EIA and persistent asthma in children and adolescents. Exercise-induced asthma is a common aspect of a prevalent disease that warrants proper diagnosis and treatment. With appropriate therapy, children with EIA should be able to participate in sports and maintain normal activity. They should strive to compete in the same playing field as their peers and have the same goals as those children and athletes who do not have exercise-induced asthma.

Effect of the addition of montelukast to inhaled fluticasone propionate on airway inflammation

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of addition of montelukast to inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) therapy, compared with FP therapy alone (100 microg twice a day) on airway immunopathology in individuals with mild asthma. Twenty-eight subjects received FP (100 microg twice a day) or FP (100 microg twice a day) plus montelukast (10 mg at night) for 8 weeks and were then crossed over to the alternate treatment for a further 8 weeks. Physiological measurements and bronchial biopsies were obtained at +/- 2 days before treatment and +/- 2 days at the end of each treatment period. A two-period crossover analysis was performed and the mean and SE were calculated. There was no significant difference in percent predicted FEV1 (p = 0.51) or PC20 mg/ml (p = 0.81) between the two treatment regimes after 8 weeks of therapy. There was no difference in the efficacy of either treatment in decreasing T cell (p = 0.97), CD45RO+ (p = 0.37), mast cell (p = 0.37), or activated eosinophils (p = 0.55) numbers in bronchial biopsies. There was no significant difference in the percentage area stained for IFN-gamma (p = 0.76) or interleukin-4 (p = 0.61) between treatments. Reduction of inflammatory cell numbers in the bronchial mucosa achieved with FP plus montelukast was not significantly different from the reduction observed with FP alone in individuals with mild asthma.

Exercise-induced asthma: diagnosis and management

OBJECTIVE

To review the diagnosis and management of exercise-induced asthma (EIA).

DATA SOURCES

Computer-assisted literature searches on MEDLINE for articles, abstracts, and other relevant data on exercise-induced asthma

STUDY SELECTION

Published articles, abstracts, and conference proceedings were selected.

RESULTS

EIA is seen in 40 to 90% of asthmatic patients. Exercise can be the sole trigger or be one of multiple triggers of asthma exacerbations. A good history and physical examination can diagnose most cases of EIA. Spirometry can confirm the diagnosis. Exercise testing may be necessary in certain cases. Prevention through both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures is the key to EIA management. Inhaled beta-agonists remain the medications of choice for EIA prophylaxis. Inhaled cromolyn and antileukotrienes are alternatives. Good long-term control of asthma with anti-inflammatory medications such as inhaled steroids will also decrease the incidence of EIA.

CONCLUSIONS

Early diagnosis and proper preventive and maintenance therapy can reduce episodes of EIA and enable patients to continue to engage in sports and lead an active life.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Exercise-induced asthma, or more appropriately, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), occurs in 80 to 90% of individuals with asthma and in approximately 11% of the general population without asthma. EIB is characterised by post-exercise airways obstruction resulting in reductions in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of greater than 10% compared with pre-exercise values. The mechanism of EIB remains elusive, although both cooling and drying of airways play prominent roles. Cold, dry inhaled air during exercise or voluntary hyperventilation is the most potent stimulus for EIB. Inflammatory mediators play central roles in causing the post-exercise airways obstruction. Diagnosis of EIB requires the use of an exercise test. The exercise can be a field or laboratory based test, but should be of relatively high intensity (80 to 90% of maximal heart rate) and duration (at least 5 to 8 minutes). Pre- and post-exercise pulmonary function should be compared, and post exercise pulmonary function determined over 20 to 30 minutes for characterisation of EIB. A pre- to post-exercise drop in FEV(1) of greater than 10% is abnormal. Approaches to treatment of EIB include both nonpharmacological and pharmacological strategies. A light exercise warm up prior to moderate to heavy exercise reduces the severity of EIB. More recently, studies have supported a role for dietary salt as a modifier of the severity of EIB, suggesting that salt restrictive diets should reduce symptoms of EIB. Short acting, inhaled beta(2)-agonists constitute the most used prophylactic treatment for EIB. However, antileukotriene agents are emerging as effective, well tolerated, long-term treatments for EIB.

The role of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTs) are mediators released in asthma and are both direct bronchoconstrictors and proinflammatory substances that mediated several steps in the pathophysiology of chronic asthma, including inflammatory cells recruitment, vascular leakage, and possibly airway remodelling. Available evidence from clinical trials and real world experience derived from managing patients with asthma justifies a broader role for antiLTRAs in asthma management than that recommended in the National Asthma Education and Prevention Programm (NAEPP) and National Health Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) treatment guidelines. Leukotriene-receptor antagonist drugs (LTRAs) seem to be effective alternatives to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) either as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy that reduces the need for higher doses of ICS in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. LTRAs may be used as adjunctive therapy for al levels of disease severity because they are effective in combination with ICS during long-term maintenance therapy. The agents seem especially effective in preventing aspirin-induced asthma, exercise-induced asthma (EIA) and they may provide an additional advantage of reducing nasal congestion in patients with both asthma and rhinitis.

Addition of anti-leukotriene agents to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Anti-leukotriene (AL) agents are being considered as "add-on" therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the safety and efficacy of daily AL plus ICS compared to ICS alone, and determine the corticosteroid-sparing effect of AL when added to ICS in chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Medline, Embase, Cinahl (until September 2001), reference lists of review articles and trials, contacted international headquarters of AL manufacturers and ATS meeting abstracts (1998-2000).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled trials of asthmatics aged 2 years and older with at least one month intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed quality and extracted data independently. Trials were grouped by asthma control at baseline (symptomatic or well-controlled) and dose of ICS in the control group (same or double).

MAIN RESULTS

Of 438 citations, 13 (12 adult and 1 paediatric) trials met inclusion criteria. Seven were published in full-text. In symptomatic patients, addition of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes to ICS resulted in a non-significant reduction in the risk of exacerbations requiring systemic steroids: Relative Risk (RR) 0.61; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.36,1.05). A modest improvement group difference in PEF was seen (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 7.71 L/min; 95%CI 2.98, 12.44 L/min) together with beta2-agonist use (WMD= -0.32 puffs/day; 95%CI -0.0.08, -0.56). No trials that compared the use of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes with doubling-dose of inhaled glucocorticoids could be pooled. In ICS-sparing studies in patients who were well controlled at baseline, addition of anti-leukotrienes produced no overall difference in dose of inhaled glucocorticoids (WMD -44.4 mcg/d, 95%CI -147.9, 59.0 mcg/d), but it was associated with fewer withdrawals due to poor asthma control (RR= 0.56, 95%CI 0.35, 0.89).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to firmly support the use of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes as add-on therapy to inhaled glucocorticoids. Addition of anti-leukotrienes to inhaled glucocorticoids may slightly improve asthma control, but the available data do not permit this strategy to be recommended as a substitute for increasing the dose of inhaled glucocorticoids. Addition of anti-leukotrienes may be associated with superior asthma control after glucocorticoid tapering, but a glucocorticoid-sparing effect cannot be quantified at present.

Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Anti-leukotrienes agents are currently being studied as alternative first line agents to inhaled corticosteroids in mild to moderate chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy of anti-leukotriene agents with inhaled glucocorticoids (ICS) and to determine the dose-equivalence of anti-leukotrienes to daily dose of ICS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Medline (1966 to Jan 2002), Embase (1980 to Jan 2002), and Cinahl (1982 to Jan 2002) were searched and reference lists of review articles and trials. We contacted colleagues and international headquarters of anti-leukotrienes producers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials that compared leukotriene antagonists with inhaled corticosteroids during a minimal 30-day intervention period in asthmatic patients aged 2 years and older.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed assessments of methodological quality and data extraction independently and blindly. The primary outcome was the rate of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids. Secondary outcomes included lung function, indices of chronic asthma control, adverse effects and withdrawal rates.

MAIN RESULTS

14 trials met the inclusion criteria; 10 were of high methodological quality; 8 are published in full-text. All were in mild-to-moderate chronic asthma, Two included children or adolescents. Trial duration was 4 - 37 weeks. In most trials, daily dose of ICS was 400 mcg of beclomethasone-equivalent. Patients treated with anti-leukotrienes were 60% more likely to suffer an exacerbation requiring systemic steroids [12 trials; Relative Risk 1.61; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.15, 2.25]. Significant differences favouring ICS were noted in most secondary outcomes, eg improvement in FEV1 [7 trials; Weighted Mean Difference 120 ml; 95% CI: 80, 170 ml ]; symptom scores [5 trials: Standardized Mean Difference 0.3; 95% CI 0.2, 0.4]. Other significant benefits of ICS were seen for nocturnal awakenings, rescue medication use, and quality of life. Risk of side effects was not different between groups, but anti-leukotriene therapy was associated with 30% increased risk of "withdrawals for any cause" or "withdrawals due to poor asthma control".

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

For most asthma outcomes, ICS at 400 mcg/day of beclomethasone-equivalent are more effective than anti-leukotriene agents given in the usual licensed doses. The exact dose-equivalence of anti-leukotriene agents in mcg of ICS remains to be determined.