Proventil HFA provides protection from exercise-induced bronchoconstriction comparable to proventil and ventolin

Albuterol/budesonide for the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma: The TYREE study

BACKGROUND

PT027 is a fixed-dose combination of albuterol (salbutamol) and budesonide in a single pressurized metered-dose inhaler.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of albuterol/budesonide compared with placebo in patients with asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, 2-period, single-dose crossover study, adolescents and adults with asthma and EIB (defined by ≥20% decrease from pre-exercise challenge forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV₁]) were randomized to albuterol/budesonide (180/160 µg) followed by placebo (n = 29) or the reverse sequence (n = 31). Subjects were stratified by background therapy (as-needed short-acting β₂-agonist alone or low-to-medium dose inhaled corticosteroid plus as-needed short-acting β₂-agonist). FEV₁ was measured 5 minutes pre-dose, 30 minutes postdose (5 minutes pre-exercise challenge [baseline]), and 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes postexercise. The primary end point was maximum percentage fall from baseline in FEV₁ up to 60 minutes postexercise challenge.

RESULTS

Least squares mean maximum percentage fall in FEV₁ up to 60 minutes postexercise challenge was 5.45% with albuterol/budesonide vs 18.97% with placebo (difference, -13.51% [95% confidence interval, -16.94% to -10.09%]; P < .001). More subjects were fully protected (maximum percentage fall in FEV₁ post-exercise challenge < 10%) with albuterol/budesonide than with placebo (78.3% vs 28.3%; P < .001). The treatment effect was consistent irrespective of background inhaled corticosteroid therapy, and albuterol/budesonide was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

In adolescents and adults with asthma and EIB, a single dose of albuterol/budesonide 180/160 µg taken approximately 30 minutes before exercise was significantly more effective than placebo in preventing EIB.

Novel albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler in patients with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: A single-dose, double-blind, randomized, 2-way crossover study

BACKGROUND

A novel, inhalation-driven, multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) was developed that eliminates the need to coordinate device actuation with inhalation as is required with conventional metered-dose inhalers.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate albuterol MDPI efficacy and safety in patients with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

METHODS

This single-dose, double-blind, 2-way crossover study randomized adolescents and adults with EIB (≥20% fall from pre-exercise challenge FEV(1)) to treatment sequences of albuterol MDPI (180 μg [2 inhalations of 90 μg each])/placebo MDPI (n = 19) or the reverse sequence (n = 19). FEV(1) was measured 30 and 5 min predose, 30 min postdose (ie, 5 min before treadmill exercise challenge; baseline) and 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min after exercise challenge. The primary efficacy endpoint was maximum percentage fall from baseline in FEV(1) up to 60 min post-exercise challenge.

RESULTS

Mean maximum percentage fall in FEV(1) within 60 min post-exercise challenge was 6.2 ± 1.4% for albuterol MDPI versus 22.4 ± 1.4% for placebo MDPI (between-treatment difference: -16.2%; 95% CI: -20.2% to -12.1%; P < 0.0001). A significantly higher percentage of albuterol MDPI-treated patients were protected against EIB (<10% maximum FEV(1) fall post-exercise challenge) versus placebo MDPI (84.2% vs 15.8%; P < 0.0001). Protection with albuterol MDPI was evident within 5 min and maintained through 30 min; recovery was complete for both groups at 60 min. Treatment with a single dose of albuterol MDPI was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Albuterol MDPI provides clinically significant protection from EIB in adolescents and adults with EIB; no new safety issues were observed with short-term albuterol MDPI use. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01791972.

Beta₂-agonists for exercise-induced asthma

BACKGROUND

It is well known that physical exercise can trigger asthma symptoms and can induce bronchial obstruction in people without clinical asthma. International guidelines on asthma management recommend the use of beta2-agonists at any stage of the disease. At present, however, no consensus has been reached about the efficacy and safety of beta2-agonists in the pretreatment of exercise-induced asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. For the purpose of the present review, both of these conditions are referred to by the acronymous EIA, independently from the presence of an underlying chronic clinical disease.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of inhaled short- and long-acting beta2-agonists, compared with placebo, in the pretreatment of children and adults with exercise-induced asthma (or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction).

SEARCH METHODS

Trials were identified by electronic searching of the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials and by handsearching of respiratory journals and meetings. Searches are current as of August 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of any study design, published in full text, that assessed the effects of inhaled beta2-agonists on EIA in adults and children. We excluded studies that did not clearly state diagnostic criteria for EIA.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 53 trials consisting of 1139 participants. Forty-eight studies used a cross-over design, and five were performed in accordance with a parallel-group design. Forty-five studies addressed the effect of a single beta2-agonist administration, and eight focused on long-term treatment. We addressed these two different intervention regimens as different comparisons.Among primary outcomes for short-term administration, data on maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) showed a significant protective effect for both short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) compared with placebo, with a mean difference of -17.67% (95% confidence interval (CI) -19.51% to -15.84%, P = 0.00001, 799 participants from 72 studies). The subgroup analysis of studies performed in adults compared with those performed in children showed high heterogeneity confined to children, despite the comparable mean bronchoprotective effect.Secondary outcomes on other pulmonary function parameters confirmed a more positive and protective effect of beta2-agonists on EIA compared with placebo. Occurrence of side effects was not significantly different between beta2-agonists and placebo.Overall evaluation of the included long-term studies suggests a beta2-agonist bronchoprotective effect for the first dose of treatment. However, long-term use of both SABA and LABA induced the onset of tolerance and decreased the duration of drug effect, even after a short treatment period.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence of low to moderate quality shows that beta2-agonists, both SABA and LABA, when administered in a single dose, are effective and safe in preventing EIA.Long-term regular administration of inhaled beta2-agonists induces tolerance and lacks sufficient safety data. This finding appears to be of particular clinical relevance in view of the potential for prolonged regular use of beta2-agonists as monotherapy in the pretreatment of EIA, despite the warnings of drug agencies (FDA, EMA) regarding LABA.

Efficacy and safety of eco-friendly inhalers: focus on combination ipratropium bromide and albuterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and its treatment is critical to improve quality of life, reduce symptoms, and diminish the frequency of COPD exacerbations. Due to the harmful environmental effects of pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) containing chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), newer systems for delivering respiratory medications have been developed.

Methods

A search of the literature in the PubMed database was undertaken using the keywords “COPD,” “albuterol,” “ipratropium bromide,” and “Respimat® Soft Mist Inhaler™”; pertinent references within the identified citations were included. The environmental effect of CFC-pMDIs, the invention of the Respimat® Soft Mist Inhaler™ (SMI) (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany), and its use to deliver the combination of albuterol and ipratropium bromide for the treatment of COPD were reviewed.

Results

The adverse environmental effects of CFC-pMDIs stimulated the invention of novel delivery systems including the Respimat SMI. This review presents its development, internal mechanism, and use to deliver the combination of albuterol and ipratropium bromide.

Conclusion

CFC-pMDIs contributed to the depletion of the ozone layer and the surge in disorders caused by harmful ultraviolet B radiation. The banning of CFCs spurred the development of novel delivery systems for respiratory medications. The Respimat SMI is an innovative device that produces a vapor of inhalable droplets with reduced velocity and prolonged aerosol duration that enhance deposition within the lower airway and is associated with improved patient satisfaction. Clinical trials have demonstrated that the Respimat SMI can achieve effects equivalent to pMDIs but with lower medication doses. The long-term safety and efficacy remain to be determined. The Respimat SMI delivery device is a novel, efficient, and well-received system for the delivery of aerosolized albuterol and ipratropium bromide to patients with COPD; however, the presence of longer-acting, less frequently dosed respiratory medications provide patients and providers with other therapeutic options.

Albuterol HFA for the management of obstructive airway disease

Albuterol (salbutamol outside the USA) is used to acutely relieve symptoms related to airway obstruction and prevent exercise-induced bronchospasm. Albuterol is most commonly administered by metered-dose inhaler (MDI). MDIs had used chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants, but CFCs accumulate in the stratosphere and contribute to ozone catabolism. Loss of the 'ozone layer', which filters UVB rays, has public health concerns. Albuterol has been reformulated in MDIs using hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellants, which do not affect the ozone layer. Albuterol HFA MDIs deliver the same amount of drug per puff with similar particle size distributions as albuterol CFC MDIs, resulting in comparable bronchodilator efficacy of the two products. The highly favorable safety profile of albuterol has not been altered with reformulation. The propellant HFA-134a appears to be devoid of safety concerns.

Section 2. Exercise-Induced Bronchospasm: Albuterol versus Montelukast: Highlights of the Asthma Summit 2009: Beyond the Guidelines

Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) involves airway obstruction with an onset shortly after exercising. It can occur in individuals without a diagnosis of asthma, but is most common in asthmatic patients (and in this scenario may be referred to as exercise-induced asthma, EIA), correlating with the patient's degree of airway hyperreactivity. While albuterol is the most commonly used rescue and prophylactic medication for EIB, the leukotriene antagonist, monetlukast, may be an appropriate choice for some patients. Clinical data have shown that once-daily treatment with montelukast (5 or 10 mg tablet) can offer protection against EIB within 3 days for some patients. Such an approach might be preferred for patients who have difficulty with inhaled medications and for children who cannot access their inhalers during the school day. Montelukast also may be an option to reduce side effects associated with albuterol for individuals who exercise regularly.

Propellant-driven metered-dose inhalers for pulmonary drug delivery

The current market for pulmonary drug delivery is at a bottleneck. The therapeutic advantages of inhalation aerosols, and the potential for the lungs as a route for systemically acting drugs, vaccines and gene therapeutic agents, have resulted in a rapid growth of the industry. Alongside this, the environment of inhaler design and formulation has changed markedly in recent years. Environmental concerns over propellants, the commercial success of dry powder inhalers, and the apparent lack of advancement of propellant-driven metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) has led to a less clear future for these devices. This review critically assesses these pressures and also potential opportunities for the pMDI. It is proposed that the future role of pMDIs will be determined by several important forces that can be classified under 'technology development' or 'market climate' categories. Technology development forces will be strengthened by the ability of the industry to have a systematic understanding of mechanisms of spray formation, perform subsequent and continued device and formulation advances, and a focus on all patient groups: particularly paediatric and geriatric populations. The ability to succeed in these areas will be largely determined by the willingness to invest in fundamental research of pMDI technologies.

Clinical efficacy of inhaler devices containing beta(2)-agonist bronchodilators in the treatment of asthma: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 100 randomized, controlled trials

BACKGROUND

A number of different inhaler devices are available to deliver beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist (beta(2)-agonist) bronchodilators in asthma. These include hydrofluoroalkane or chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free propelled pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), many dry powder inhalers and breath-actuated inhalers.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical efficacy of all available hand-held inhaler devices compared with the standard CFC-containing pMDI for the delivery of short-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilators in nonacute asthma in both children and adults.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out of all available randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) using the standard pMDI compared with any other hand-held inhaler device, delivering short-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilators in patients with stable asthma.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen RCTs were included in this review. No clinical differences were found between the standard CFC-containing pMDI and 12 other hand-held inhaler devices for most outcome measures. We found no evidence of clinical differences between studies using either a 1 : 1 (pMDI: another inhaler) or a 2 : 1 dosing ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable asthma, short-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilators in standard CFC-pMDIs are as effective as any other hand-held inhaler device; therefore the cheapest available device that the patient is able to use should always be considered. Pharmaceutical companies should in future submit to regulatory authorities clinical outcome data (as opposed to in vitro data) in support of any dosing schedules greater than 1 : 1 when compared with the standard pMDI. Clinical effectiveness studies that use an intention-to-treat analysis and report more patient-centered outcomes are required.

One-Year Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Ipratropium Bromide HFA and CFC Inhalation Aerosols in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

INTRODUCTION

Ipratropium bromide (IB) is an established and effective first-line maintenance treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A new IB metered-dose inhaler (MDI) using hydrofluoroalkane 134a propellant (IB HFA) has been developed as an alternative to the MDI containing chlorofluorocarbon (IB CFC).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term safety and efficacy of IB HFA and IB CFC in patients with COPD.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, 1-year, multi-centre trial. Primary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and vital signs. Secondary endpoints included therapeutic response (>15% increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] peak change from baseline), FEV(1) area under the response-time curve (AUC).

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Patients (n = 456) with moderate-to-severe COPD, who received either IB HFA (n = 305) or IB CFC (n = 151 ), both 42µg four times daily.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the incidences of individual AEs between groups over the short and long term; respiratory disorders were the most common. The incidence of anticholinergic AEs possibly related to treatment was low (1.3% IB HFA, 0.7% IB CFC). Serious AEs occurred in 19.0% and 20.5%, and discontinuations due to AEs in 7.2% and 7.3%, of patients receiving IB HFA and IB CFC, respectively. Therapeutic bronchodilatory responses were achieved in 76-81% and 72-84% of patients, and AUC ranged from 0.117-0.148L and 0.117-0.174L, in patients receiving IB HFA and IB CFC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IB HFA had similar efficacy and tolerability to IB CFC over 1 year, supporting a seamless transition from the CFC MDI to the HFA MDI in both short- and long-term treatment.

A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of single doses of HFA 134a albuterol and CFC albuterol in mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

After the signing of the Montreal Protocol in 1987, new propellants for use in pressurized metered-dose inhalers that are non-ozone-depleting have been developed.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of single doses of albuterol/HFA 134a with albuterol/CFC and to demonstrate a dose-response among the different doses of both formulations.

METHODS

A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Sixty-three adolescent and adult asthmatic patients were randomized to receive at separate treatment visits single doses via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler of either placebo/hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a; 100 microg, 200 microg, or 400 microg albuterol/HFA 134a; 100 microg or 200 microg albuterol/chlorofluorocarbon (CFC). Triplicate measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were made immediately before dosing and 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours postdose. The primary efficacy variables were area under the entire 6-hour FEV1 curve, relative to baseline subtracted from the area above baseline (AUC(0-6)) and peak effect (derived from serial FEV1 measurements).

RESULTS

Analysis of AUC(0-6) and peak effect showed that all doses of albuterol had a significantly greater effect than placebo (HFA 134a propellant). Comparisons of the two formulations at 100 microg and 200 microg showed no difference in AUC(0-6) (100 microg, -0.23 Lhr, P = 0.114 and 200 microg -0.08 Lhr, P = 0.590) or in peak effect, percentage of baseline (100 microg, -1.3%, P = 0.354 and 200 microg, 0.17%, P = 0.902). There were no differences seen among formulations in the incidence of adverse events or with any of the other safety parameters, including electrocardiograms, vital signs, clinical laboratory assessments, and asthma exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated comparability in terms of efficacy and safety between albuterol/HFA 134a and albuterol/CFC.

Albuterol HFA is as effective as albuterol CFC in preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

Secondary to the phase-out of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), the albuterol (Ventolin, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (MDI) has been formulated in a non-ozone-depleting propellant, hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of albuterol HFA to albuterol CFC and placebo HFA in protecting patients from exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB).

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study in patients with documented EIB. Patients (n = 24) aged 18 to 45 years old received albuterol HFA or albuterol CFC, (total dose of 180 microg ex-actuator), or placebo HFA via an MDI, 30 minutes before a standardized exercise challenge. Serial forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) measurements were made 5 minutes before exercise and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 60 minutes postexercise. The primary outcome measure was the maximum percentage fall in FEV1 over the 60 minutes after exercise.

RESULTS

The adjusted mean maximum percentage falls in FEV1 postexercise for albuterol HFA and CFC groups were 15.4% and 14.9%, respectively. The two formulations were comparable with a treatment difference of -0.5% (P = 0.848; 95% confidence interval, -5.3 to 4.4%). When compared with the fall in FEV1 for placebo (33.7%), both active treatments demonstrated a significantly smaller fall in FEV1 postexercise (P < 0.001). Safety profiles were similar among the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide assurance to prescribers that the formulation of albuterol in the non-ozone-depleting propellant HFA 134a has not affected its efficacy in the treatment of EIB in asthmatic patients. Single doses of albuterol HFA and CFC from an MDI are comparable in terms of efficacy and safety on a microgram per microgram basis.

Pressurised metered dose inhalers versus all other hand-held inhaler devices to deliver beta-2 agonist bronchodilators for non-acute asthma

BACKGROUND

A number of different inhaler devices are available to deliver beta2-agonist bronchodilators in asthma. These include hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) or chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free propelled pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder devices.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical effectiveness of pMDI compared with any other available handheld inhaler device for the delivery of short-acting beta-2 agonist bronchodilators in non-acute asthma in children and adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Collaboration Clinical Trials register was searched for studies as well as separate additional searches carried out on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and also on the Current Contents Index as well as the Science Citation Index. In addition, 17 individual online respiratory journals and 12 electronically available clinical trial databases were also searched. The UK pharmaceutical companies who manufacture inhaled asthma medication were contacted in order to obtain details of any published or unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

- The full texts of all potentially relevant articles were reviewed independently by two reviewers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Fixed and random effect models were used. Dichotomous outcomes were assessed using Odds Ratios or Relative Risks (RR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-four randomised controlled trials were included in this review, but few could be combined to assess a specific outcome for a given delivery device comparison. Only two studies required demonstration of adequate pMDI technique as an entry requirement. There were no difference between a standard CFC containing pMDI and any other device for most outcomes. Regular use of HFA-pMDI containing salbutamol reduced the requirement for short courses of oral corticosteroids (3 trials, 519 patients: RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.49, 0.91); however the total number of exacerbations were unchanged (3 trials, 1271 patients: RR 1.0; 95% CI 0.75, 1.33).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable asthma, short-acting beta-2 bronchodilators in standard CFC-pMDI's are as effective as any other devices. The effect of HFA-pMDI on requirement for oral corticosteroid courses to treat acute exacerbations should be confirmed. Effectiveness studies that use an intention-to-treat analysis are required.

Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering beta (2 )agonists bronchodilators in asthma

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers compared with other hand held inhaler devices for delivering short acting beta(2) agonists in stable asthma.

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Airways Group specialised trials database (which includes hand searching of 20 relevant journals), Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled clinical trials register, pharmaceutical companies, and bibliographies of included trials.

TRIALS

All trials in children or adults with stable asthma that compared the pressurised metered dose inhaler (with or without a spacer device) against any other hand held inhaler device containing the same beta(2) agonist.

RESULTS

84 randomised controlled trials were included. No differences were found between the pressurised metered dose inhaler and any other hand held inhaler device for lung function, blood pressure, symptoms, bronchial hyperreactivity, systemic bioavailability, inhaled steroid requirement, serum potassium concentration, and use of additional relief bronchodilators. In adults, pulse rate was lower in those using the pressurised metered dose inhaler compared with those using Turbohaler (standardised mean difference 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.84); patients preferred the pressurised metered dose inhaler to the Rotahaler (relative risk 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.78); hydrofluoroalkane pressurised metered dose inhalers reduced the requirement for rescue short course oral steroids (relative risk 0.67, 0.49 to 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence was found to show that alternative inhaler devices are more effective than standard pressurised metered dose inhalers for delivering acting beta(2 )agonist bronchodilators in asthma. Pressurised metered dose inhalers remain the most cost effective delivery devices.

Ipratropium bromide hydrofluoroalkane inhalation aerosol is safe and effective in patients with COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide reformulated with the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free propellant hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-134a (ipratropium bromide HFA) to that of the marketed ipratropium bromide inhalation aerosol (containing CFC) in patients with COPD.

DESIGN

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The primary efficacy parameter was acute bronchodilator response. The primary end points were peak change in FEV(1) from baseline and area under the response-time curve.

SETTING

Thirty-one clinical centers in the United States participated in this project.

PATIENTS

A total of 507 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized, and 444 patients completed the trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Twelve weeks of treatment four times daily with one of the following: ipratropium bromide HFA, 42 microg; ipratropium bromide HFA, 84 microg; HFA placebo; ipratropium bromide inhalation aerosol, 42 microg; or CFC placebo.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Patients in all active treatment groups had significant bronchodilator responses as shown by increases in mean FEV(1) from baseline of at least 15%. Bronchodilator response in all active treatment groups was also significantly more than their respective placebo treatments based on FEV(1), area under the time-response curve from 0 to 6 h, and peak response. FVC results were similar to those seen with FEV(1). There were no significant differences in adverse events, laboratory findings, or ECG findings among the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipratropium bromide HFA, 42 and mgr;g, provided bronchodilation comparable to the marketed ipratropium bromide CFC, 42 and mgr;g, over 12 weeks of regular use.

Switching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA is well tolerated and effective in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Environmental imperatives to eliminate the use of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants in metered-dose inhalers have led to the development of metered-dose inhalers with the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA-134a) propellants.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical effect of switching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA and to compare the efficacy and safety of Ventolin CFC, Ventolin HFA, and placebo in patients with asthma.

METHODS

Multicenter, double-blind, randomized safety and efficacy trial comparing regular use of Ventolin CFC versus Ventolin HFA versus placebo for 12 weeks in 313 patients with asthma aged 12 years and older who received Ventolin CFC during a 3-week run-in period.

RESULTS

Patients who were switched from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA maintained pulmonary function and other measures of asthma control at levels comparable with run-in baseline. Serial pulmonary function testing demonstrated that both Ventolin treatments had significantly greater mean improvement in FEV1 over baseline than the placebo group at treatment day 1 and weeks 6 and 12 (P < .001). Both Ventolin groups had comparable pulmonary function at every visit. Predose FEV1 values were maintained or improved over time with all treatments. Treatments were well-tolerated. The adverse event profile for both Ventolin treatments was comparable with placebo. No clinically relevant effects on ECG, vital signs, or clinical laboratory tests were noted. Asthma exacerbation rates were 4% to 5% in the Ventolin groups and slightly higher (8%) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were switched from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA maintained comparable asthma control with a similar safety profile.

Fenoterol hydrobromide delivered via HFA-MDI or CFC-MDI in patients with asthma: a safety and efficacy comparison

The main objective of the study was to compare the long-term safety and tolerability of fenoterol hydrobromide delivered using a metered-dose inhaler formulated with the alternative propellant, hydrofluoroalkane 134a (HFA-MDI), with delivery using the currently available chlorofluorocarbon MDI (CFC-MDI; Berotec 100). A further objective was to compare the efficacy of fenoterol HFA-MDI with fenoterol CFC-MDI, using the pulmonary function parameters of forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Following a 2-week run-in phase, a 12-week, double-blind parallel group comparison was undertaken in 290 patients randomized on a 2:1 basis to two puffs of 100 microg fenoterol four times a day (HFA-MDI=197 patients; CFC-MDI=93 patients). A total of 236 patients in this multi-centre study completed the trial as planned. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar in both groups (29.9% of HFA-MDI patients and 28% of CFC-MDI patients). Reports of respiratory disorder AEs were also comparable (21.8% HFA-MDI; 22.6% CFCMDI). End of study laboratory tests, ECG, pulse, blood pressure and physical examination showed no significant differences from pre-study baselines in either group and both treatments appeared to be well tolerated. Pre-dose FEV1 measurements taken at the three clinic visits were constant and increase in FEV1 at 5 and 30 min post-dose demonstrated equivalent efficacy for the two formulations. No difference between the two groups was observed in PEF or in the use of rescue medication. We conclude from these findings that the long-term safety and efficacy profile of fenoterol HFA-MDI is comparable to that of the fenoterol CFC-MDI.

Use of hydrofluoroalkane propellant delivery system for inhaled albuterol in patients receiving asthma medications

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to assess drug-use patterns associated with albuterol delivery via a new propellant device compared with conventional chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) in patients taking asthma medications in a population with pharmacy benefits.

BACKGROUND

In addition to their ozone-depleting properties, conventional CFC inhalers often deliver inconsistent doses because of loss of prime and temperature instability. A new propellant, hydrofluoroalkane (HFA), incorporates a re-engineered delivery system associated with dosing reproducibility throughout the life of the canister.

METHODS

Drug markers associated with management of asthma were used to identify a study cohort of new users of inhaled albuterol from a geographically diverse pharmacyclaims database from July 1, 1997, through December 31, 1997. A population of 282,879 members was identified over the 20-month follow-up period. In addition, a subset of chronic albuterol inhaler users (> or = 12 months; n = 96,879) was also identified to support a longitudinal analysis. Disease severity was controlled for by use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). To control for canisters received via physician office samples, HFA patient use was corrected by a physician-based canister adjustment based on HFA sample data.

RESULTS

A total of 53.1% of participants were women and 46.1% were men; most of the population (72.5%) was <65 years of age. Canister use for HFA patients was consistently lower (2.7+/-3.2 vs 5.4+/-6.7) than for CFC MDIs for the entire cohort over the 20-month assessment period. This difference was consistently observed for albuterol canister use in patients with and without concomitant ICS use (3.3+/-3.8 HFA vs 7.2+/-7.5 CFC for ICS users and 2.1+/-2.1 HFA vs 4.1+/-5.7 CFC for non-ICS users). Time to next prescription also was longer for HFA patients than for CFC patients (61.6+/-50.9 days HFA vs 47.3+/-40.8 days CFC). When duration of therapy and physician samples associated with product launch were controlled for, similar differences were consistently observed. CFC patients used, on average, 1.3 more canisters per year than did HFA patients (P < 0.001), averaging 10.7 canisters (95% CI, 10.6 to 10.7), compared with 9.4 canisters used by HFA patients (95% CI, 8.9 to 9.9). Further analyses indicated that this finding was consistent when ICS use was controlled for (CFC plus ICS mean, 11.9 canisters vs HFA plus ICS mean, 10.4 canisters; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study provides useful information about the effect of use of a new albuterol delivery system on asthma inhaler management. These data suggest that CFC patients use an average of 1.3 more canisters per year compared with HFA patients independent of asthma severity as measured by ICS use. This improvement in dosing characteristics has the potential to translate into enhanced economic outcomes.

Proventil HFA prevents exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children

Short-acting inhaled beta2-agonists used just prior to exercise are an effective method for preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children. This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period crossover study that compared the effectiveness of albuterol formulated in hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) to albuterol formulated in chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and to placebo in protecting asthmatic children age 6-11 from EIB. Patients self-administered either HFA albuterol, two different CFC albuterol products, or placebo 30 min prior to exercise challenge. Spirometry was performed predose and 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 min after the exercise challenge was completed. The smallest percent change from the predose forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) after exercise challenge was similar for the three active treatments, and each of the active treatments was significantly better than placebo. Each active treatment had significantly fewer patients unprotected from EIB (unprotected defined as having >20% fall in FEV1 after exercise challenge) than placebo. Changes in heart rate, blood pressure and electrocardiogram (ECG) intervals were similar for the three active treatments following exercise. HFA albuterol is as effective as albuterol products formulated in CFCs and more effective than placebo in protecting asthmatic children from EIB.