Reduced dose intravenous immunoglobulin does not decrease transplant-related complications in adults given related donor marrow allografts

Risk of infection according to the gamma globulin level in the 100 days following allogeneic stem cell transplantations

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is recommended in case of severe hypogammaglobulinemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, the supposed increased risk of infection in case of hypogammaglobulinemia has not been confirmed in allo-HSCT. In this study, we assessed the relationship between the gamma globulin level and the risk of infection during the 100 days following the allo-HSCT.

METHODS

We gathered the weekly laboratory tests from day 7 to day 100 of 76 allograft patients, giving a total of 1 044 tests. 130 infections were documented clinically, by imaging, or microbiologically.

RESULTS

Average gamma globulin levels between D-7 and D100 did not differ between patients with or without infection (642 ± 232 and 671 ± 246 mg/dL, respectively, P = .65). Gamma globulin level <400 mg/dl was not associated with the occurrence of infection between the test studied and the next one (aOR 1.33 [0.84-2.15], P = .24). The gamma globulin level was not predictive of bacterial or fungal infections (AUC 0.54 [95%CI: 0.47-0.61]) nor of viral reactivations (AUC 0.51 [95%CI: 0.43-0.60]).

CONCLUSIONS

This confirmed that the humoral deficiency is a minor part of the immune deficiency in the 100 days post-transplant. This questions the relevance of the indications of immunoglobulin substitution during this period.

Effectiveness of immunoglobulin prophylaxis in reducing clinical complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic immunoglobulin has been used with varying efficacy to reduce complications in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomized controlled trials that assessed clinical outcomes (overall survival, transplant-related mortality, graft-versus-host disease [GVHD], veno-occlusive disease [VOD], interstitial pneumonitis, disease relapse, cytomegalovirus [CMV] infection and disease, non-CMV infection) of immunoglobulin prophylaxis versus placebo in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to June 2017. Quality of included studies and outcomes were evaluated via Risk of Bias assessment and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 899 citations screened, 27 studies (n = 3934) were included. Immunoglobulin prophylaxis had no impact on survival (risk ratio [RR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.01; 11 studies, n = 1962) but decreased risk of acute GVHD (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.94; eight studies, n = 1097) and CMV disease (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.97; two studies, n = 167). Meta-analysis revealed increased risk of VOD (RR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.10-8.41; three studies, n = 384) and disease relapse (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.49; seven studies, n = 1647). Other outcomes were small in sample size or nonsignificant. Results should be interpreted cautiously given the low quality of studies and evidence of outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Immunoglobulin prophylaxis did not have a significant effect on survival. Positive clinical effects were shown for acute GVHD and CMV disease and negative effects against VOD and disease relapse. No studies examined the effect of immunoglobulin treatment in hypogammaglobulinemic patients despite current guidelines, warranting further studies in this population.

Role of Immunoglobulin Therapy to Prevent and Treat Infections

Immunoglobulins have been used widely in medicine for a variety of diseases including infectious diseases. While the main clinical applications of immunoglobulin therapy concern their use as replacement for patients with primary immunodeficiencies, or as treatment for autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, their role in infectious disease is limited largely to viral and toxin neutralization and replacement therapy in patients with immunoglobulin deficiencies. Many aspects of the therapeutic regimen of immunoglobulins even in the established indications remain open. Recently, due to the worldwide surge of immunosuppression caused by AIDS, organ transplantation, cancer, and autoimmune therapies, as well as the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria, there has been renewed interest in the use of antibody preparation to prevent infections in high-risk groups.

Knowing the limitations of the current anti-infective armamentarium, approaches that target the host through manipulations to augment the host immune response provide a helpful aid to conventional treatment options. A substantial body of evidence has demonstrated that strategies aiming to support or stimulate immune response could be feasible approaches that would benefit immunocompromised patients. In the present chapter, we present contemporary indications of immunoglobulin administration for therapy and prophylaxis of infections in the immunocompromised population.

The role of immunoglobulin prophylaxis for prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients

BACKGROUND

Following cessation of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) administration for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients at our unit, we observed a sharp decline in the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection.

PROCEDURE

We conducted a retrospective study of the role of IVIg in the prevention of CMV infection in children and young adults who underwent HSCT from matched related donor.

RESULTS

We included 109 patients (IVIg+/IVIg- ratio 82/27). Median age was 8.5 years. Patients were transplanted for malignant (59.7%) and nonmalignant diseases (40.3%) with myeloablative, reduced-intensity, and nonmyeloablative conditioning in 76, 22, and 2% of the transplants, respectively. Graft sources were peripheral blood stem cells, bone marrow, and cord blood in 58.7, 39.4, and 2%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of CMV infection at 1 year after HSCT was significantly higher in the cohort that did not receive IVIg compared with the one that did (44.4% vs. 13.4%, respectively, P = 0.001). Significant risk factor for CMV infection in the cohort not receiving IVIg was conditioning with total body irradiation (TBI) (87.5% in TBI+ vs. 26.3% in TBI-, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that children and young adults who undergo HSCT with TBI may need a preemptive regimen of anti-CMV treatment, if they do not get IVIg prophylaxis.

Intravenous immune globulin and thromboembolic adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

Prior case reports and observational studies indicate that intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) products may cause thromboembolic events (TEEs), leading the FDA to require a boxed warning in 2013. The effect of IVIg treatment on the risk of serious TEEs (acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or venous thromboembolism) was assessed using adverse event data reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IVIg. RCTs of IVIg in adult patients from 1995 to 2015 were identified from Pubmed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.Gov, and two large prior reviews of IVIg's therapeutic applications. Trials at high risk of detection or reporting bias for serious adverse events were excluded. 31 RCTs with a total of 4,129 participants (2,318 IVIg-treated, 1,811 control) were eligible for quantitative synthesis. No evidence was found of increased TEE risk among IVIg-treated patients compared with control patients (odds ratio = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.44, 2.88; risk difference = 0.0%, 95% CI: -0.7%, 0.7%, I(2)  = 0%). No significant increase in risk was found when arterial and venous TEEs were analyzed as separate endpoints. Trial publications provided little specific information concerning the methods used to ascertain potential adverse events. Care should be taken in extrapolating the results to patients with higher baseline risks of TEE. Am. J. Hematol. 91:594-605, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparison of prophylactic use of intravenous immunoglobulin versus Pentaglobin® in pediatric patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

There are few studies evaluating the use of IgM-enriched IVIG (Pentaglobin(®) ) in HSCT recipients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of prophylactic use of IVIG versus prophylactic use of Pentaglobin(®) within the first 100 days after allogeneic HSCT. We performed a prospective, randomized study of the use of prophylactic IVIG versus prophylactic use of Pentaglobin(®) in patients after allogeneic HSCT. The first dose of IVIG or Pentaglobin(®) was given before conditioning regimen and after transplant was given on day +1, +8, +15, and +22. And then, it was given if IgG level was below 400 mg/dL. Twenty-seven patients in IVIG group and 32 patients in Pentaglobin(®) group were included in the study. There were no significant differences in the duration of neutropenia, hospitalization, fever, and in the number of pyrexial episode, septicemia, bacteremia, local infection, CMV infection, acute GVHD, VOD, and adverse events between the IVIG group and Pentaglobin(®) group. Randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to conclude that utilization of IVIG or Pentaglobin(®) has no beneficial effect in HSCT.

Clinical impact of hematogones on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Increased levels of normal B cell precursors, termed hematogones (HGs), are observed in regenerating bone marrow after chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Recent reports suggest that emergence of HGs is associated with better outcomes following allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT). We reviewed the emergence of HGs and the clinical features of 192 patients after allo-BMT. Patients undergoing allo-BMT from related donors were more likely to develop HGs at day 30 compared to unrelated donors. Furthermore, patients undergoing allo-BMT from HLA-mismatched donors were less likely to develop HGs at day 30. The emergence of HGs at day 30 was an independent prognostic factor among patients who underwent BMT. We found no difference in the relapse rate between HG-positive (+) and HG-negative (-) patients undergoing BMT. HG (-) patients had high non-relapse mortality, grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), fungal infection, and lower IgG levels compared to HG (+) patients. The emergence of HGs at day 30 among patients undergoing BMT may be a very useful indicator of subsequent survival outcomes or acute GVHD in common clinical practice.

Role of Natural Killer Cells in Intravenous Immunoglobulin-Induced Graft-versus-Host Disease Inhibition in NOD/LtSz-scidIL2rg(-/-) (NSG) Mice

Although clinical studies have yet to demonstrate clearly the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), their effective use in a xenogeneic mouse model has been demonstrated. We aimed to determine the mechanism of action by which IVIG contributes to GVHD prevention in a xenogeneic mouse model. NOD/LtSz-scidIL2rg(-/-) (NSG) mice were used for our xenogeneic mouse model of GVHD. Sublethally irradiated NSG mice were injected with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (huPBMCs) and treated weekly with PBS or 50 mg IVIG. Incidence of GVHD and survival were noted, along with analysis of cell subsets proliferation in the peripheral blood. Weekly IVIG treatment resulted in a robust and consistent proliferation of human natural killer cells that were activated, as demonstrated by their cytotoxicity against K562 target cells. IVIG treatment did not inhibit GVHD when huPBMCs were depleted in natural killer (NK) cells, strongly suggesting that this NK cell expansion was required for the IVIG-mediated prevention of GVHD in our mouse model. Moreover, inhibition of T cell activation by either cyclosporine A (CsA) or monoclonal antihuman CD3 antibodies abolished the IVIG-induced NK cell expansion. In conclusion, IVIG treatment induces NK cell proliferation, which is essential for IVIG-mediated protection of GVHD in our mouse model. Furthermore, activated T cells are mandatory for effective IVIG-induced NK cell proliferation. These results shed light on a new mechanism of action of IVIG and could explain why the efficacy of IVIG in preventing GVHD in a clinical setting, where patients receive CsA, has never been undoubtedly demonstrated.

Incidence and risk factors for hypogammaglobulinemia in pediatric patients following allo-SCT

We evaluated the incidence and risk factors for hypogammaglobulinemia after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in pediatric patients. Ig levels were measured pre-transplant, every 2 weeks until day 100 and then monthly post SCT in 185 patients undergoing myeloablative HSCT. Median age was 9 years; 142 (77%) had malignant disease and 114 (62%) received stem cells from an unrelated source. Hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG <500 mg/dL) developed in 143 (77%) of the patients at a median of 56 days (range 15-339) post SCT. The cumulative incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia at 1 year was higher among patients who developed acute GVHD (97% vs 54%, P<0.001), and for those receiving stem cells from an unrelated source (94% vs 51%, P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of TRM was significantly higher for patients with hypogammaglobulinemia (P=0.026). In multivariable analysis, lower pre-transplant IgG level (P<0.001), younger age (P=0.012), diagnosis of malignant disease (P<0.001), receiving unrelated SCT (P<0.001) and development of acute GVHD (P<0.001) were all significantly associated with higher risk of hypogammaglobulinemia post HSCT. We conclude that hypogammaglobulinemia is common, following allogeneic HSCT in pediatric patients, especially in those with malignant diseases, those who receive an unrelated transplant or patients who develop GVHD.

Use of immunoglobulins in the prevention of GvHD in a xenogeneic NOD/SCID/γc- mouse model

The efficacy of IVIG in preventing GvHD has not been definitely demonstrated clinically. Using a xenogeneic model of GvHD in NOD/SCID/γc- (NSG) mice, we showed that weekly administration of IVIG significantly reduced the incidence and associated mortality of GvHD to a degree similar to CsA. Unlike CsA and OKT3, IVIG were not associated with inhibition of human T-cell proliferation in mice. Instead, IVIG significantly inhibited the secretion of human IL-17, IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-15 suggesting that IVIG prevented GvHD by immunomodulation. Furthermore, the pattern of modification of the human cytokine storm differed from that observed with CsA and OKT3. Finally, in a humanized mouse model of immune reconstitution, in which NSG mice were engrafted with human CD34(+) stem cells, IVIG transiently inhibited B-cell reconstitution, whereas peripheral T-cell reconstitution and thymopoiesis were unaffected. Together these in vivo data raise debate related to the appropriateness of IVIG in GvHD prophylaxis. In addition, this model provides an opportunity to further elucidate the precise mechanism(s) by which IVIG inhibit GvHD.

In vivo B-cell depletion with rituximab for alternative donor hemopoietic SCT

We retrospectively analyzed 55 patients given a fixed dose of rituximab (200 mg) on day+5 after an alternative donor transplant, to prevent EBV DNA-emia; 68 alternative transplants who did not receive prophylactic rituximab served as controls. The two groups were comparable for donor type, and all patients received anti-thymocyte globulin in the conditioning regimen. Rituximab patients had a significantly lower rate of EBV DNA-emia 56 vs 85% (P=0.0004), a lower number of maximum median EBV copies (91 vs 1321/10(5) cells, P=0.003) and a significantly lower risk of exceeding 1000 EBV copies per 10(5)cells (14 vs 49%, P=0.0001). Leukocyte and lymphocyte counts were lower on day +50 and+100 in rituximab patients, whereas Ig levels were comparable. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD was significantly reduced in rituximab patients (20 vs 38%, P=0.02). Chronic GvHD was comparable. There was a trend for a survival advantage for patients receiving rituximab (46 vs 40%, P=0.1), mainly because of lower transplant mortality (25 vs 37%, P=0.1). Despite the drawback of a retrospective study, these data suggest that a fixed dose of rituximab on day +5 reduces the risk of a high EBV load, and also reduces acute GvHD.

Immunoglobulin prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Because the role of immunoglobulins (IVIG) prophylaxis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) has not been established in terms of survival and infection prevention, we conducted a meta-analysis evaluating these issues.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials comparing prophylaxis with polyvalent IVIG or cytomegalovirus (CMV)-IVIG and control or another preparation or dose. PUBMED, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and conference proceedings were searched. Two reviewers appraised the quality of trials and extracted data. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were estimated and pooled.

RESULTS

Thirty trials including 4,223 patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT) were included. There was no difference in all-cause mortality when polyvalent IVIG or CMV-IVIG was compared to control (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.12; and RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.16, respectively). There was no difference in clinically documented infections when polyvalent IVIG was compared with control (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.10; five trials). CMV infections were not significantly reduced with either polyvalent IVIG or CMV-IVIG. Interstitial pneumonitis was reduced with polyvalent IVIG in older studies but not in the more recent ones, nor in studies assessing CMV-IVIG. Polyvalent IVIG increased the risk for veno-occlusive disease (RR, 2.73; (95% CI, 1.11 to 6.71). Graft-versus-host disease was not affected.

CONCLUSION

Because there is no advantage in terms of survival or infection prevention, IVIG does not have a role in HSCT.

Immunoglobulin prophylaxis in hematological malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and those with lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) have a higher incidence of infections due to secondary hypogammaglobulinemia. One approach is the prophylactic administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed conflicting results in terms of type, schedule, dose and hematological patients benefiting from IVIG. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of IVIG in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether prophylaxis with IVIG reduces mortality or affects other outcomes in patients with hematological malignancies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed (January 1966 to December 2007), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, up to 2007, issue 1), LILACS and conference proceedings published between 2002-2007 were searched. The terms "immunoglobulins" or "gammaglobulins" or specific gammaglobulins and similar and the terms "hematologic neoplasms" or "hematologic malignancies" or "transplant" or "autotransplant" or "allotransplant" or "bone marrow transplant" or "peripheral stem cell transplant" and similar were selected. References of all included trials and reviews identified were scanned for additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs comparing prophylaxis of IVIG with placebo, no treatment or another immunoglobulin preparation, different administration schedules or doses for patients with hematological malignancies were included. One author screened all abstracts identified through the search strategy and two reviewers independently inspected each reference identified by the search and applied inclusion criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For each trial, results were expressed as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data and weighted mean differences for continuous data. We conducted meta-analysis, where enough similar trials were available, using the fixed- effects model, unless significant heterogeneity was present. We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of individual methodological quality measures on effect estimates, including allocation generation, concealment and blinding.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty trials were included: thirty included HSCT patients and ten included patients LPD. When polyvalent immunoglobulins or hyperimmune cytomegalovirus (CMV)-IVIG was compared to control for HSCT, there was no difference in all-cause mortality. Polyvalent immunoglobulins significantly reduced the risk for interstitial pneumonitis but increased the risk for veno-occlusive disease and adverse events. In LPD, no benefit in terms of mortality IVIG could be demonstrated but there was a decrease in clinically and microbiologically documented infections.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing HSCT, routine prophylaxis with IVIG is not supported. Its use may be considered in LPD patients with hypogammaglobulinemia and recurrent infections, for reduction of clinically documented infections.

Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: GvHD prevention and treatment

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is the major cause of transplant-related mortality and morbidity. As it is closely related to the major therapeutic principle, graft-versus-leukaemia (GvL) effect, risk assessment has to balance both risks depending on the pre-transplant status. This is clearly demonstrated when comparing the two major strategies for prevention of GvHD. While the majority of approaches aiming at T-cell depletion show efficacy in reducing acute and chronic GvHD and transplant-related mortality, T-cell depletion also affects graft-versus-leukaemia effects and thus results in a higher relapse rate. Thus, standard prophylaxis relying on calcineurin inhibitors frequently results in at least equivalent or even superior long-term disease-free survival, and the risk of relapse has to be considered when selecting regimens for prevention of GvHD. In addition to this general dilemma, drug-specific side-effects and risks have to be considered when selecting regimens for GvHD prevention and treatment.

Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Immune Globulin for Hematologic Conditions

Canada's per capita use of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) grew by approximately 115% between 1998 and 2006, making Canada one of the world's highest per capita users of IVIG. It is believed that most of this growth is attributable to off-label usage. To help ensure IVIG use is in keeping with an evidence-based approach to the practice of medicine, the National Advisory Committee on Blood and Blood Products of Canada (NAC) and Canadian Blood Services convened a panel of national experts to develop an evidence-based practice guideline on the use of IVIG for hematologic conditions. The mandate of the expert panel was to review evidence regarding use of IVIG for 18 hematologic conditions and formulate recommendations on IVIG use for each. A panel of 13 clinical experts and 1 expert in practice guideline development met to review the evidence and reach consensus on the recommendations for the use of IVIG. The primary sources used by the panel were 3 recent evidence-based reviews. Recommendations were based on interpretation of the available evidence and where evidence was lacking, consensus of expert clinical opinion. A draft of the practice guideline was circulated to hematologists in Canada for feedback. The results of this process were reviewed by the expert panel, and modifications to the draft guideline were made where appropriate. This practice guideline will provide the NAC with a basis for making recommendations to provincial and territorial health ministries regarding IVIG use management. Specific recommendations for routine use of IVIG were made for 7 conditions including acquired red cell aplasia; acquired hypogammaglobulinemia (secondary to malignancy); fetal-neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia; hemolytic disease of the newborn; HIV-associated thrombocytopenia; idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura; and posttransfusion purpura. Intravenous immune globulin was not recommended for use, except under certain life-threatening circumstances, for 8 conditions including acquired hemophilia; acquired von Willebrand disease; autoimmune hemolytic anemia; autoimmune neutropenia; hemolytic transfusion reaction; hemolytic transfusion reaction associated with sickle cell disease; hemolytic uremic syndrome/thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; and viral-associated hemophagocytic syndrome. Intravenous immune globulin was not recommended for 2 conditions (aplastic anemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) and was contraindicated for 1 condition (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia). For most hematologic conditions reviewed by the expert panel, routine use of IVIG was not recommended. Development and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines may help to facilitate appropriate use of IVIG.

Management of sensitized patients awaiting renal transplantation: Does sequential therapy of intravenous immunoglobulin and simvastatin offer a solution?

The value of intravenous immunoglobulin and simvastatin as potential modalities for the treatment of sensitized patients was studied. We aimed to test their efficacy as solo agents to inhibit anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. We tested samples from 11 adult hemodialysis patients who were waiting for renal allotransplantation at our center, all of whom had persistently positive crossmatches with their living related donors and panel reactive antibody titers more than 20%. All patients received intravenous immunoglobulin (500 mg/kg/day on alternate days for 6 doses). Panel reactive antibody titer measurement and crossmatch testing were carried out after each dose and before each subsequent one. Two months later, 8 patients received simvastatin (20 mg/day) for 2 months. Panel reactive antibody measurement titer and crossmatch testing were carried out every 2 weeks. Only 4 patients showed an insignificant reduction in panel reactive antibody activity (P=0.36). None of them attained a negative crossmatch. Furthermore, simvastatin also resulted in an insignificant reduction of HLA antibodies in 3 patients (P=0.32). We concluded that intravenous immunoglobulin or simvastatin alone cannot effectively inhibit preformed anti-HLA antibodies to allow successful renal transplantation. Further trials of the use of intravenous immunoglobulin and simvastatin with other modalities to desensitize these patients may be warranted.

Increasingly frequent diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The reported incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after hematopoietic cell transplantation with HLA-identical sibling donors has increased considerably during the past 15 to 20 years at our center. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential reasons for this change. We reviewed organ stages and overall grades of GVHD for 2220 patients who received a first marrow or peripheral blood cell transplant from an HLA-identical sibling or an HLA-allele-matched unrelated donor with the use of a posttransplantation immunosuppressive regimen that included both methotrexate and cyclosporine between 1985 and 2001. The most striking change was an increased incidence of stage 1 gut involvement from 10% to 20% before 1992 to 50% to 60% since 1992, both with related and unrelated donors. This change increased the incidence of grade II GVHD with sibling donors, such that the overall incidence of grade II to IV GVHD is now 60% to 70%. Among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, the increasingly frequent diagnosis of acute GVHD since 1992 has not been associated with decreased survival. A high diagnostic sensitivity and increased awareness that gut GVHD can occur without skin involvement account for the increased incidence of acute GVHD at our center.

Desensitization and subsequent kidney transplantation of patients using intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg)

Transplantation of patients possessing antibodies against allo-HLA antigens can be delayed for years. We have shown that administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) can induce a profound and sustained decrease in the titers of anti-HLA antibodies. We report here the first series of patients desensitized, then transplanted using IVIg therapy. Fifteen patients have been included and treated with IVIg, given as 3 monthly courses of 2g/kg body weight. Thirteen of those 15 patients (87%) were effectively desensitized and underwent immediate transplantation. Eleven were transplanted with a cadaveric donor, and two with a living donor against which the pretreatment cross-match was positive. One graft was lost from thrombosis and one from rejection. All other patients had uneventful courses, without any episodes of rejection, with a follow-up of more than 1 year. Thus, IVIg therapy allows safe and prompt kidney transplantation of immunized patients.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison of different doses of intravenous immunoglobulin for prevention of graft-versus-host disease and infection after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Intravenous immunoglobulin is approved for use in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients for prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infections, but the minimally effective dose has not been established. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, patients undergoing allogeneic marrow transplantation were randomized to receive 100 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, or 500 mg/kg doses of intravenous immunoglobulin. Each dose was given weekly for 90 days and then monthly until 1 year after transplant. Six hundred and eighteen patients were evaluated. Acute GVHD (grades 2-4) occurred in 39% of the patients (80 of 206) in the 100 mg/kg group, 42% of the patients (88 of 208) in the 250 mg/kg group, and in 35% of the patients (72 of 204) in the 500 mg/kg group (P = 0.344). Among patients with unrelated marrow donors, a higher dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (500 mg/kg) was associated with less acute GVHD (P = 0.07). The incidences of chronic GVHD, infection and interstitial pneumonia were similar for all three doses of intravenous immunoglobulin. The dose of intravenous immunoglobulin also had no effect on the types of infection, relapse of hematological malignancy or survival. Except for more frequent chills (P = 0.007) and headaches (P = 0.015) in patients given the 500 mg/kg or 250 mg/kg dose of immunoglobulin, adverse events were similar for all three doses. These results suggest that 100 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg doses of intravenous immunoglobulin are associated with similar incidences of GVHD and infections in most allogeneic marrow transplants. These results should be considered when designing cost-effective strategies for the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in allogeneic marrow transplants receiving other current regimens for prophylaxis of GVHD and infection.

Preventing opportunistic infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Practice Guidelines and beyond

This review presents evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of infection after blood and marrow transplantation. Recommendations apply to all myeloablative transplants regardless of recipient (adult or child), type (allogeneic or autologous) or source (peripheral blood, marrow or cord blood) of transplant. In Section I, Dr. Dykewicz describes the methods used to rate the strength and quality of published evidence supporting these recommendations and details the two dozen scholarly societies and federal agencies involved in the genesis and review of the guidelines. In Section II, Dr. Longworth presents recommendations for hospital infection control. Hand hygiene, room ventilation, health care worker and visitor policies are detailed along with guidelines for control of specific nosocomial and community-acquired pathogens. In Section III, Dr. Boeckh details effective practices to prevent viral diseases. Leukocyte-depleted blood is recommended for cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative allografts, while ganciclovir given as prophylaxis or preemptive therapy based on pp65 antigenemia or DNA assays is advised for individuals at risk for CMV. Guidelines for preventing varicella-zoster virus (VZV), herpes simplex virus (HSV) and community respiratory virus infections are also presented. In Section IV, Drs. Baden and Rubin review means to prevent invasive fungal infections. Hospital design and policy can reduce exposure to air contaminated with fungal spores and fluconazole prophylaxis at 400 mg/day reduces invasive yeast infection. In Section V, Dr. Sepkowitz details effective clinical practices to reduce or prevent bacterial or protozoal disease after transplantation. In Section VI, Dr. Sullivan reviews vaccine-preventable infections and guidelines for active and passive immunizations for stem cell transplant recipients, family members and health care workers.