Use and interpretation of HCV diagnostic tests in the clinical setting

Hepatitis C care cascade among patients with and without tuberculosis: Nationwide observational cohort study in the country of Georgia, 2015-2020

BACKGROUND

The Eastern European country of Georgia initiated a nationwide hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination program in 2015 to address a high burden of infection. Screening for HCV infection through antibody testing was integrated into multiple existing programs, including the National Tuberculosis Program (NTP). We sought to compare the hepatitis C care cascade among patients with and without tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in Georgia between 2015 and 2019 and to identify factors associated with loss to follow-up (LTFU) in hepatitis C care among patients with TB.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Using national ID numbers, we merged databases of the HCV elimination program, NTP, and national death registry from January 1, 2015 to September 30, 2020. The study population included 11,985 adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with active TB from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019, and 1,849,820 adults tested for HCV antibodies between January 1, 2015 and September 30, 2020, who were not diagnosed with TB during that time. We estimated the proportion of patients with and without TB who were LTFU at each step of the HCV care cascade and explored temporal changes. Among 11,985 patients with active TB, 9,065 (76%) patients without prior hepatitis C treatment were tested for HCV antibodies, of which 1,665 (18%) had a positive result; LTFU from hepatitis C care was common, with 316 of 1,557 (20%) patients with a positive antibody test not undergoing viremia testing and 443 of 1,025 (43%) patients with viremia not starting treatment for hepatitis C. Overall, among persons with confirmed viremic HCV infection, due to LTFU at various stages of the care cascade only 28% of patients with TB had a documented cure from HCV infection, compared to 55% among patients without TB. LTFU after positive antibody testing substantially decreased in the last 3 years, from 32% among patients diagnosed with TB in 2017 to 12% among those diagnosed in 2019. After a positive HCV antibody test, patients without TB had viremia testing sooner than patients with TB (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.46, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [1.39, 1.54], p < 0.001). After a positive viremia test, patients without TB started hepatitis C treatment sooner than patients with TB (HR = 2.05, 95% CI [1.87, 2.25], p < 0.001). In the risk factor analysis adjusted for age, sex, and case definition (new versus previously treated), multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB was associated with an increased risk of LTFU after a positive HCV antibody test (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 1.41, 95% CI [1.12, 1.76], p = 0.003). The main limitation of this study was that due to the reliance on existing electronic databases, we were unable to account for the impact of all confounding factors in some of the analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

LTFU from hepatitis C care after a positive antibody or viremia test was high and more common among patients with TB than in those without TB. Better integration of TB and hepatitis C care systems can potentially reduce LTFU and improve patient outcomes both in Georgia and other countries that are initiating or scaling up their nationwide hepatitis C control efforts and striving to provide personalized TB treatment.

Diagnostics in hepatitis C: The end of response-guided therapy?

On-treatment hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA has been used to predict response to interferon (IFN)-based therapy. The concept of response-guided treatment (RGT) was established to determine optimal treatment duration and to early identify patients not responding to futile therapies. RGT helped to improve sustained virologic response (SVR) rates and lower the rates of adverse effects. RGT was of particular importance for telaprevir- and boceprevir-based triple therapies. RGT strategies are dependent on highly sensitive and reproducible HCV RNA quantification. However, different HCV RNA assays are used in routine clinical practice and these differ significantly in their performance characteristics. The development of IFN-free therapies has fundamentally changed the role of on-treatment HCV RNA for SVR prediction. Given the high efficacy and excellent tolerability of IFN-free regimens, the interest in treatment individualization has decreased. However, shorter treatment durations may still be desirable, particularly with respect to the high costs of current IFN-free direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Moreover, some difficult-to-treat patients remain, e.g., those infected with HCV genotype 3 in whom the current standard of care may not always be sufficient to achieve SVR, especially in treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis. Here, a RGT extension may be feasible. However, current data on the predictive value of on-treatment HCV RNA are limited and have shown conflicting results. As more potent DAAs become available, the role of response prediction may diminish further. Currently, shorter treatment duration is only based on baseline HCV RNA whereas no RGT strategy is recommended for any of the approved DAA regimens available.

Medex test, a novel modality for liver disease diagnosis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver diseases are associated with significant morbidity and health- related expenditure. Although cost-effective treatments are available, the disease is often asymptomatic until late in its course. "Medex Test," is the noninvasive detection of liver abnormalities by the measurement of changes in electrical impedance of dermal zones. This method is based on neuroreflexology, a branch of complementary medicine. This study addressed 2 questions: can Medex Test detect liver disease, and can it measure the severity of a known liver disease.

METHODS

This blinded case-control study included 2 parts. First, 113 patients with a known liver disease (hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) and 85 controls with no known liver disease were evaluated by the Medex Test device. Second, necroinflammatory grading of biopsy results of 60 patients with chronic hepatitis C were compared with grade determined by Medex Test.

RESULTS

Medex Test detected with high sensitivity (85%) and specificity (94.1%) the presence of liver disorders. The high rates were similar for the different disorders and were independent of age and sex. Additionally, Medex Test matched the biopsy pathologic grading of necroinflammation in 78% of patients. Positive predictive value was not affected by age and sex and was better for higher degree of necroinflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrated that Medex Test detects with high accuracy the presence of liver disorders and the necroinflammatory grade. This noninvasive, low cost test may in the future become an important tool in the diagnosis and management of liver disorders. We believe the further study of this novel method is warranted.

Current and future hepatitis C virus diagnostic testing: problems and advancements

Serological antibody assays used in hepatitis C virus diagnosis have improved in sensitivity and specificity. However, detection of active viremia or monitoring levels of virus during or after patient treatment is most commonly undertaken using nucleic acid-based technologies. Advancements in diagnostic technologies and implications for managing patients with hepatitis C in various clinical settings are discussed.

[Immunoblot as a supplemental test to detect antibodies to hepatitis C virus in blood donors]

Supplemental tests using Immunoblot are recommended to improve specificity of anti-HCV by ELISA. In Brazil immunoblot is not officially recommended. Aiming to identify EIA false-positive rate 70 positive EIA anti-HCV blood donors were submitted to 3rd generation immunoblot at Hemocentro of Mato Grosso State where polymerase chain reaction tests are not performed. There were 44 (62.9%) immunoblot-positive, 22 (31.4%) negative and 4 (5.7%) indeterminate. Anti-HCV immunoblot can distinguish blood donors with false-positive ELISA from those who need medical assessment. Our data suggest that immunoblot could be useful in Brazilian blood banks where molecular biology tests are not available.

Management of interferon therapy nonresponders

Despite improvements in the therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) over the past several years, many patients still fail to become hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) undetectable during treatment and are classified as nonresponders. Providing treatment recommendations for these patients requires that the likelihood of achieving any benefit from another course of therapy be balanced with the natural history of chronic HCV. The management of nonresponders represents the most challenging of all aspects in the care of patients with chronic HCV. Retreatment of interferon non-responders with interferon and ribavirin has yielded a long-term virologic benefit in only 10% to 25% of patients. The efficacy of peginterferon and peginterferon with ribavirin for nonresponders has yet to be defined.

Decreased serum aminotransferase activity in patients with chronic renal failure: impact on the detection of viral hepatitis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in the dialysis population and patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) not requiring dialysis. HCV is the most important cause of chronic liver disease in dialysis patients; however, its role has been underestimated by the lower aminotransferase activity in the dialysis population. Aminotransferase activity in patients with CRF not requiring dialysis has not been adequately addressed to date. The aim of this study is to investigate whether serum aminotransferase levels in predialysis patients with CRF are less than those obtained in healthy individuals and dialysis patients. We also analyzed the potential association between serum aminotransferase activity and demographic, clinical, and biochemical parameters. Aspartate (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity was greater in antibody to hepatitis C (anti-HCV)-positive than anti-HCV-negative patients with CRF not requiring dialysis (AST, 32.3 +/- 19 versus 18.1 +/- 8 IU/L [P = 0.0001]; ALT, 32.9 +/- 28 versus 17.7 +/- 11 IU/L [P = 0.00001], respectively). Predialysis patients with CRF had lower AST and ALT activity in comparison to healthy individuals (AST, 19.7 +/- 11.2 versus 20.4 +/- 6.8 IU/L [P = 0.00001]; ALT, 19.5 +/- 15.1 versus 21.7 +/- 11.3 IU/L [P = 0.00001], respectively). The difference was much greater after correction for viral markers: AST and ALT levels in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative anti-HCV-negative predialysis patients with CRF were less than those in the healthy population (AST, 17.9 +/- 8 versus 20.4 +/- 6.8 IU/L [P = 0.00001]; ALT, 17.5 +/- 10 versus 21.7 +/- 11.3 IU/L [P = 0.00001], respectively). Comparison of AST and ALT activity between age-matched healthy and predialysis seronegative CRF groups showed lower AST and ALT values in the study population. HBsAg-negative anti-HCV-negative dialysis patients had lower AST and ALT activity than seronegative predialysis patients with CRF (AST, 16.6 +/- 11.6 versus 17.9 +/- 8 IU/L [P = 0.01]; ALT, 16.3 +/- 9.4 versus 17.5 +/- 10 [P = 0.041], respectively). Multivariate analysis in the predialysis CRF population showed an independent association between AST (P = 0.00001) and ALT (P = 0.00001) activity and anti-HCV positivity, and age was negatively linked to AST (P = 0.011) and ALT levels (P = 0.001). AST level was negatively related to serum creatinine level (P = 0.0001). In conclusion, HCV infection causes significant liver injury in predialysis patients with CRF. These patients have decreased aminotransferase activity compared with the general population. Dialysis patients show lower aminotransferase activity than predialysis patients with CRF. Because serum aminotransferase levels are commonly used to screen for liver disease in the dialysis and predialysis CRF population, recognition of liver damage may be hampered by the reduction in aminotransferase values in these patients. Studies aimed to clarify the pathogenesis of this phenomenon are in progress.

Hepatitis C screening strategies in hemodialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, with an estimated yearly incidence of 0.2% and prevalence between 8% and 10%. Although a screening strategy based on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values is currently recommended, this strategy has not been evaluated for cost-effectiveness compared with other potential screening strategies. A comparison therefore was made using a decision-analysis model of a simulated cohort of 5,000 hemodialysis patients followed up for 5 years. Using direct medical costs, three strategies were evaluated, including: (1) ALT values with confirmatory testing (biochemical), (2) serial enzyme-linked immunosorbent and strip immunoblot assay testing (serological), and (3) polymerase chain reaction (viral). Under baseline assumptions, the per-patient cost of screening hemodialysis patients for HCV was $378 for biochemical-based testing, $195 for serological-based testing, and $696 for viral-based testing. Our model was robust when varying the costs of testing, as well as the incidence and prevalence of HCV infection. Results of sensitivity analysis by varying costs, HCV incidence, and HCV prevalence indicated that serological-based screening was less costly than biochemical testing. Biochemical testing was in turn less costly than viral-based screening. Serological-based testing was also more effective in the diagnosis of de novo HCV infection, with a likelihood ratio of 85, in contrast to the likelihood ratio of 44 with biochemical-based testing using viral-based screening as the gold standard. A serological-based screening strategy is less costly and more effective than biochemical-based screening in the diagnosis of de novo HCV infection. Serological-based screening should be considered for HCV screening in hemodialysis populations.

Hepatitis C: a brief clinical overview

Hepatitis C has emerged as an important public health problem that has affected 3.9 million Americans and 170 million people worldwide and is currently the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation. The disease, characterized by asymptomatic onset, is often discovered incidentally through blood tests obtained during routine physical examination or before blood donation. Spontaneous recovery occurs in about 20% of patients. Among those who remain chronically infected, an equal percentage progress to cirrhosis within 20 yr, have stable nonprogressive disease, or progress more slowly over 40 to 60 yr. At present, combination therapy with interferon plus ribavirin is the treatment of choice for hepatitis C-infected patients identified as appropriate candidates for therapy. Unfortunately, sustained response rates are only modest, with a lesser response among African Americans, and treatment is associated with a number of side effects. Research studies attempting to improve the response to current therapy, to identify alternative treatments or treatment strategies, and to develop an effective vaccine are ongoing and will hopefully provide us with the ability to better understand and manage hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C

In the latter half of the 20th century, HCV emerged as the most common cause of chronic liver disease, and will likely remain so. Since its initial discovery in 1989, rapid progress has been made in our understanding of the virology, epidemiology, natural history, diagnosis, and treatment of HCV. Over the next few decades, as further advancements are made, superior treatment options will become available.

Tests for acute and chronic viral hepatitis. Finding your way through the alphabet soup of infection and superinfection

Because clinical signs are of little or no help for identifying various causes of viral hepatitis, accurate diagnosis can only be achieved with serologic and molecular testing. Knowledge of the strengths and limitations of these tests allows rational use and interpretation of results. The findings have implications for public health surveillance, estimating prognosis, and identifying candidates for treatment.

Diagnostic testing for hepatitis C: practical considerations

Although knowledge of the molecular biology of the hepatitis C virus is rapidly evolving, current therapeutic strategies remain suboptimal for most patients with chronic hepatitis C. It is hoped that with information derived from virologic variables, therapy can be tailored to individual patients, offering them the greatest likelihood of response or preventing the unnecessary use of costly and occasionally unpleasant medications when treatment failure is deemed probable. Genotyping and quantitation of hepatitis C virus have provided great insights into the pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis C. Retrospective studies have demonstrated that hepatitis C virus genotyping and viral burden may play some role in disease progression and response to therapy. With the widespread availability of these tests, it is important to try to develop a rational plan for their use that will provide information in a manner that is both cost-effective and relevant to clinical decision making for the individual patient. At this point, the utility of measuring hepatitis C virus RNA levels and genotyping in making decisions about treatment regimens or monitoring therapy in daily clinical practice is continually evolving.

Association of multispecific CD4(+) response to hepatitis C and severity of recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

After liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV), reinfection of the allograft invariably occurs. Indirect evidence suggests that the cellular immune response may play a central role. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the correlation between HCV-specific peripheral CD4(+) T-cell responses and the severity of recurrence after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Fifty-eight HCV-seropositive patients, including 43 liver transplant recipients with at least 1 year of histological follow-up, were studied. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from fresh heparinized blood and stimulated with either recombinant HCV antigens (core, E2, NS3, NS4, and NS5) or control antigens.

RESULTS

Fourteen (40%) of 35 patients with mild or no evidence of histological recurrence within their allografts responded to at least 1 of the HCV antigens. Eleven responded to NS3, 5 to all the nonstructural antigens, and 3 to the HCV core polypeptide alone. In contrast, in the 8 patients with severe HCV recurrence, no proliferation in response to any of the HCV antigens was seen (P = 0. 03) despite responses to the control antigens.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite immunosuppression, HCV-specific, major histocompatibility complex class II- restricted CD4(+) T-cell responses are detectable in patients with minimal histological recurrence after liver transplantation. In contrast, PBMCs from patients with severe HCV recurrence, despite being able to proliferate in response to non-HCV antigens, fail to respond to the HCV antigens. These findings suggest that the inability to generate virus-specific T-cell responses plays a contributory role in the pathogenesis of HCV-related graft injury after liver transplantation. It is hoped that further characterization of the immunoregulatory mechanisms related to recurrent HCV will provide the rationale for novel therapeutic strategies and diminish the incidence of inevitable graft loss.

Hepatitis C virus: current understanding and prospects for future therapies

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide and the leading indication for liver transplantation. The hallmark of the disease is its propensity to evolve into chronicity, probably because viral heterogeneity allows the virus to escape immune-mediated neutralization. Treatment with interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) has been disappointing, but higher and more frequent doses, and combination therapies, including nucleoside analogs, might lead to improved suppression of HCV RNA levels. Molecular analysis of HCV before and during treatment has indicated that high viral RNA levels and the presence of HCV genotype 1 are independent predictors of poor treatment outcome. New antiviral agents in development include inhibitors of HCV replicative enzymes, such as protease, helicase and polymerase, as well as several genetic approaches, such as ribozymes and antisense oligonucleotides. The main hindrance to drug development for hepatitis C is the lack of a small animal model or a productive tissue culture system for assessing drug action.