Influence of strontium on bone mineral density and bone mineral content measurements by dual X-ray absorptiometry

Relationship between Change in Bone Mineral Density of Lumbar Spine and Risk of New Vertebral and Nonvertebral Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

Studies have shown that the change in lumbar spine bone mineral density with different osteoporosis drugs had a beneficial effect on the frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal females, but their results were conflicting. This meta‐analysis was performed to evaluate this relationship. A systematic literature search up to May 2020 was performed and 20 studies with 73,390 postmenopausal females were included; of them, a total of 41,980 were treated with osteoporosis drugs and 31,410 with placebo. They reported relationships between the change in lumbar spine bone mineral density and the frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal females. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated comparing the osteoporosis drugs to placebo effect on the frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal females using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed‐effect model. Treatment with osteoporosis drugs had significantly lower frequency of new vertebral fractures (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.45–0.63, P < 0.001) and nonvertebral fractures (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78–0.87, P < 0.001) compared to placebo in postmenopausal females. Treatment with osteoporosis drugs had a significantly lower frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures compared to placebo in postmenopausal females. This relationship forces us to recommend osteoporosis drugs in postmenopausal females to avoid any possible new fractures. A cost‐effective study is recommended.

Validation of the Surrogate Threshold Effect for Change in Bone Mineral Density as a Surrogate Endpoint for Fracture Outcomes: The FNIH-ASBMR SABRE Project

The surrogate threshold effect (STE) is defined as the minimum treatment effect on a surrogate that is reliably predictive of a treatment effect on the clinical outcome. It provides a framework for implementing a clinical trial with a surrogate endpoint. The aim of this study was to update our previous analysis by validating the STE for change in total hip (TH) BMD as a surrogate for fracture risk reduction; the novelty of this study was this validation. To do so, we used individual patient data from 61,415 participants in 16 RCTs that evaluated bisphosphonates (nine trials), selective estrogen receptor modulators (four trials), denosumab (one trial), odanacatib (one trial), and teriparatide (one trial) to estimate trial-specific treatment effects on TH BMD and all, vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures. We then conducted a random effects meta-regression of the log relative fracture risk reduction against 24-month change in TH BMD, and computed the STE as the intersection of the upper 95% prediction limit of this regression with the line of no fracture reduction. We validated the STE by checking whether the number of fractures in each trial provided 80% power and determining what proportion of trials with BMD changes ≥ STE reported significant reductions in fracture risk. We applied this analysis to (i) the trials on which we estimated the STE; and (ii) trials on which we did not estimate the STE. We found that the STEs for all, vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures were 1.83%, 1.42%, 3.18%, and 2.13%, respectively. Among trials used to estimate STE, 27 of 28 were adequately powered, showed BMD effects exceeding the STE, and showed significant reductions in fracture risk. Among the validation set of 11 trials, 10 met these criteria. Thus STE differs by fracture type and has been validated in trials not used to develop the approach. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Treatment-related changes in bone mineral density as a surrogate biomarker for fracture risk reduction: meta-regression analyses of individual patient data from multiple randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The validation of bone mineral density (BMD) as a surrogate outcome for fracture would allow the size of future randomised controlled osteoporosis registration trials to be reduced. We aimed to determine the association between treatment-related changes in BMD, assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and fracture outcomes, including the proportion of treatment effect explained by BMD changes.

METHODS

We did a pooled analysis of individual patient data from multiple randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials. We included data from multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of osteoporosis medications that included women and men at increased osteoporotic fracture risk. Using individual patient data for each trial we calculated mean 24-month BMD percent change together with fracture reductions and did a meta-regression of the association between treatment-related differences in BMD changes (percentage difference, active minus placebo) and fracture risk reduction. We also used individual patient data to determine the proportion of anti-fracture treatment effect explained by BMD changes and the BMD change needed in future trials to ensure fracture reduction efficacy.

FINDINGS

Individual patient data from 91 779 participants of 23 randomised, placebo-controlled trials were included. The trials had 1-9 years of follow-up and included 12 trials of bisphosphonate, one of odanacatib, two of hormone therapy (one of conjugated equine oestrogen and one of conjugated equine oestrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate), three of PTH receptor agonists, one of denosumab, and four of selective oestrogen receptor modulator trials. The meta-regression revealed significant associations between treatment-related changes in hip, femoral neck, and spine BMD and reductions in vertebral (r2 0·73, p<0·0001; 0·59, p=0·0005; 0·61, p=0·0003), hip (0·41, p=0·014; 0·41, p=0·0074; 0·34, p=0·023) and non-vertebral fractures (0·53, p=0·0021; 0·65, p<0·0001; 0·51, p=0·0019). Minimum 24-month percentage changes in total hip BMD providing almost certain fracture reductions in future trials ranged from 1·42% to 3·18%, depending on fracture site. Hip BMD changes explained substantial proportions (44-67%) of treatment-related fracture risk reduction.

INTERPRETATION

Treatment-related BMD changes are strongly associated with fracture reductions across randomised trials of osteoporosis therapies with differing mechanisms of action. These analyses support BMD as a surrogate outcome for fracture outcomes in future randomised trials of new osteoporosis therapies and provide an important demonstration of the value of public access to individual patient data from multiple trials.

FUNDING

Foundation for National Institutes of Health.

A review of the latest insights into the mechanism of action of strontium in bone

Interest in strontium (Sr) has persisted over the last three decades due to its unique mechanism of action: it simultaneously promotes osteoblast function and inhibits osteoclast function. While this mechanism of action is strongly supported by in vitro studies and small animal trials, recent large-scale clinical trials have demonstrated that orally administered strontium ranelate (SrRan) may have no anabolic effect on bone formation in humans. Yet, there is a strong correlation between Sr accumulation in bone and reduced fracture risk in post-menopausal women, suggesting Sr acts via a purely physiochemical mechanism to enhance bone strength. Conversely, the local administration of Sr with the use of modified biomaterials has been shown to enhance bone growth, osseointegration and bone healing at the bone-implant interface, to a greater degree than Sr-free materials. This review summarizes current knowledge of the main cellular and physiochemical mechanisms that underly Sr's effect in bone, which center around Sr's similarity to calcium (Ca). We will also summarize the main controversies in Sr research which cast doubt on the 'dual-acting mechanism'. Lastly, we will explore the effects of Sr-modified bone-implant materials both in vitro and in vivo, examining whether Sr may act via an alternate mechanism when administered locally.

Influence of Prevalent Vertebral Fracture on the Correlation between Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density and Risk of New Vertebral Fracture: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The correlation between change in bone mineral density (BMD) and the incidence of new vertebral fracture has been drawing attention in regard to evaluation of fracture risk and drug efficacy. We investigated the impact of the prevalence of vertebral fracture on this correlation via a meta-regression analysis with a view to improving evaluation of the correlation.

METHODS

A total of 19 postmenopausal osteoporosis clinical studies involving 62,432 patients in 46 placebo or treatment groups were identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We performed a multivariate meta-regression analysis to examine the correlation between the percentage change in lumbar spine BMD from baseline at 3 years and the proportion of subjects experiencing new vertebral fractures, with or without the proportion of subjects with prevalent vertebral fracture as a covariate. We also analyzed the interaction between the subgroups divided by the proportion of subjects with prevalent vertebral fracture and the percentage change in lumbar spine BMD from baseline at 3 years.

RESULTS

A multivariate meta-regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the change in lumbar spine BMD and the proportion of subjects experiencing new vertebral fracture, and a lower Akaike information criterion was obtained when the proportion of subjects with prevalent vertebral fracture was added as an explanatory variable. Significant interaction between the proportion of subjects with prevalent vertebral fracture and the change in lumbar spine BMD was shown.

CONCLUSIONS

The change in lumbar spine BMD, not BMD T-score at one timepoint, had a significant correlation with the incidence of vertebral fracture. The prediction of the fracture risk by change in lumbar spine BMD was improved by adjusting the proportion of subjects with prevalent vertebral fracture in the study population. The difference of prevalence of vertebral fracture among populations should be considered when the association between change in lumbar spine BMD and incidence of vertebral fracture is examined.

Effect of Strontium Ranelate on the Muscle and Vertebrae of Ovariectomized Rats

Osteoporosis is often accompanied by sarcopenia. The effect of strontium ranelate (SR) on muscle tissue has not been investigated sufficiently. In this study, the effect of different SR treatments on muscle was studied. Additionally, the lumbar vertebrae were analyzed. Three-month-old female rats were divided into five groups (n = 12): Group 1: untreated (NON-OVX); Group 2: ovariectomized and left untreated (OVX); Group 3: SR after OVX until the study ended (13 weeks, SR prophylaxis and therapy = pr+th); Group 4: OVX and SR for 8 weeks (SR prophylaxis = pr); Group 5: SR for 5 weeks from the 8 week after OVX (SR therapy = SR th). SR was applied in food (630 mg/kg body weight). The size of muscle fibers, capillary density, metabolic enzymes, and mRNA expression were assessed in soleus, gastrocnemius, and longissimus muscles. The vertebral bodies underwent micro-CT, biomechanical, and ashing analyses. In general, SR did not alter the muscle histological parameters. The changes in fiber size and capillary ratio were related to the body weight. Myostatin mRNA was decreased in Sr pr+th; protein expression was not changed. SR th led to increase in mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf-B). In lumbar spine, SR pr+th enhanced biomechanical properties, bone mineral density, trabecular area, density, and thickness and cortical density. The reduced calcium/phosphate ratio in the SR pr+th group indicates the replacement of calcium by strontium ions. SR has no adverse effects on muscle tissue and it shows a favorable time-dependent effect on vertebrae. A functional analysis of muscles could verify these findings.

Assessment of the effect of strontium, lead, and aluminum in bone on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound measurements: A phantom study

PURPOSE

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard technique to measure areal bone mineral density (aBMD) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Because DXA relies on the attenuation of photon to estimate aBMD, deposition of bone-seeking metallic elements such as strontium, lead, and aluminum that differ in atomic numbers from calcium can cause inaccurate estimation of aBMD. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is another technique available to assess bone health by measuring broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS), and an empirically derived quantity called stiffness index (SI). Because the acoustic properties are not prone to significant change due to changes in microscopic atomic composition of bone, it is hypothesized that QUS is unaffected by the presence of bone-seeking elements in the bone. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of strontium, lead, and aluminum on DXA-derived aBMD and QUS parameters using bone-mimicking phantoms compatible with both techniques.

METHODS

Bone-mimicking phantoms were produced by homogeneously mixing finely powdered hydroxyapatite compounds that contain varying concentrations of strontium, lead, or aluminum with porcine gelatin solution. Seven strontium-substituted phantoms were produced with varying molar ratio of Sr/(Sr + Ca) ranging from 0% to 2%. Four lead-doped phantoms and four aluminum-doped phantoms were constructed with the respective analyte concentrations ranging from 50 to 200 ppm. An additional 0 ppm phantom was produced to be used as a baseline for the lead and aluminum phantom measurements. All phantoms had uniform volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of 200 mg/cm³ , and were assessed using a Hologic Horizon^® DXA device and a Hologic Sahara^® QUS device. Furthermore, theoretical aBMD bias for mol/mol% substitution of calcium with the three bone-seeking elements was calculated.

RESULTS

Strong positive linear relationship was found between aBMD measured by DXA and strontium concentration (P < 0.001, r = 0.995). From the measurement of lead and aluminum phantoms using DXA, no statistically significant relationship was observed between aBMD and the analyte concentrations. For the QUS system, with an exception of BUA and lead concentration that exhibited statistically significant relationship (P < 0.038, r = 0.899), no statistically significant change was observed in all QUS parameters with respect to the clinically relevant concentration of all three elements. The calculated theoretical aBMD bias induced by 1 mol/mol% substitution of calcium with strontium, lead, and aluminum were 10.8%, 4.6%, and -0.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

aBMD measured by DXA was prone to overestimation in the presence of strontium, but acoustic parameters measured by QUS are independent of strontium concentration. The deviation in aBMD induced by the clinically relevant concentrations of lead and aluminum under 200 ppm could not be detected using the Hologic Horizon^® DXA device. Furthermore, the SI measured by the QUS system was not affected by lead or aluminum concentrations used in this study.

A predictive mechanical model for evaluating vertebral fracture probability in lumbar spine under different osteoporotic drug therapies

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures represent a major cause of disability, loss of quality of life and even mortality among the elderly population. Decisions on drug therapy are based on the assessment of risk factors for fracture from bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. A previously developed model, based on the Damage and Fracture Mechanics, was applied for the evaluation of the mechanical magnitudes involved in the fracture process from clinical BMD measurements. BMD evolution in untreated patients and in patients with seven different treatments was analyzed from clinical studies in order to compare the variation in the risk of fracture. The predictive model was applied in a finite element simulation of the whole lumbar spine, obtaining detailed maps of damage and fracture probability, identifying high-risk local zones at vertebral body. For every vertebra, strontium ranelate exhibits the highest decrease, whereas minimum decrease is achieved with oral ibandronate. All the treatments manifest similar trends for every vertebra. Conversely, for the natural BMD evolution, as bone stiffness decreases, the mechanical damage and fracture probability show a significant increase (as it occurs in the natural history of BMD). Vertebral walls and external areas of vertebral end plates are the zones at greatest risk, in coincidence with the typical locations of osteoporotic fractures, characterized by a vertebral crushing due to the collapse of vertebral walls. This methodology could be applied for an individual patient, in order to obtain the trends corresponding to different treatments, in identifying at-risk individuals in early stages of osteoporosis and might be helpful for treatment decisions.

Normalization of bone mineral density after five years of treatment with strontium ranelate

E.F., female, age 58, mother of 4 children and otherwise healthy, had gone into menopause when she was 42. She had received hormone replacement therapy during 8 years. Due to low bone mass she had been treated with oral alendronate during 7 years. She had a normal calcium intake in her diet and engaged in regular physical activity. She did not smoke, and drank alcohol only occasionally. Her mother had sustained a hip fracture at age 90. Bone densitometry of her lumbar spine by DXA showed a T-score of -3.0; standardized bone mineral density (sBMD) had decreased by 11% in the previous 3 years. She was advised to start treatment with strontium ranelate (SrR) 2 g/day, plus oral cholecalciferol (1,000 IU/day). Three months later serum alkaline phosphatase had increased 10%, and serum osteocalcin was 18.9 ng/ml (upper normal limit 13.7). One year later her lumbar BMD had increased by 13.5%. After five years of treatment the BMD value was normal (1.357 g/cm(2); T-score -0.3). The case presented here is noteworthy for two reasons. Firstly, the patient maintained low bone mass after several years of combined treatment with alendronate and hormone replacement; this combination usually induces greater densitometric responses than either treatment given alone. Secondly, she responded promptly and significantly to SrR in spite of the previous long exposure to alendronate. SrR is widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis. It is an effective and safe drug, provided the patients are properly selected. As shown here, it can help some patients to achieve a normal BMD.

An overview on the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a worldwide health problem related to the aging of the population, and it is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. It is related to substantial morbidity, mortality and impairment of the quality of life. Estrogen deficiency is the major contributing factor to bone loss after menopause. The lifetime fracture risk at 50 years of age is about 50% in women. The aim of the treatment of osteoporosis is to prevent fractures. Non-pharmacological treatment involves a healthy diet, prevention of falls, and physical exercise programs. Pharmacological treatment includes calcium, vitamin D, and active medication for bone tissue such, as anti-resorptives (i.e., SERMs, hormonal replacement therapy, bisphosphonates, denosumab), bone formers (teriparatide), and mixed agents (strontium ranelate). Bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate) are the most used anti-resorptive agents for the treatment of osteoporosis. Poor compliance, drug intolerance, and adverse effects can limit the benefits of the treatment. Based on the knowledge on bone cells signaling, novel drugs were developed and are being assessed in clinical trials.

Bone histomorphometry of transiliac paired bone biopsies after 6 or 12 months of treatment with oral strontium ranelate in 387 osteoporotic women: randomized comparison to alendronate

Preclinical studies indicate that strontium ranelate (SrRan) induces opposite effects on bone osteoblasts and osteoclasts, suggesting that SrRan may have a dual action on both formation and resorption. By contrast, alendronate (ALN) is a potent antiresorptive agent. In this multicenter, international, double-blind, controlled study conducted in 387 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, transiliac bone biopsies were performed at baseline and after 6 or 12 months of treatment with either SrRan 2 g per day (n = 256) or alendronate 70 mg per week (n = 131). No deleterious effect on mineralization of SrRan or ALN was observed. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (268 patients with paired biopsy specimens), changes in static and dynamic bone formation parameters were always significantly higher with ALN compared with SrRan at month 6 (M6) and month 12 (M12). Static parameters of formation were maintained between baseline and the last value with SrRan, except for osteoblast surfaces, which decreased at M6. Significant decreases in the dynamic parameters of formation (mineralizing surface, bone formation rate, adjusted apposition rate, activation frequency) were noted at M6 and M12 in SrRan. Compared with ALN, the bone formation parameters at M6 and M12 were always significantly higher (p < 0.001) with SrRan. ALN, but not SrRan, decreased resorption parameters. Compared with the baseline paired biopsy specimens, wall thickness was significantly decreased at M6 but not at M12 and cancellous bone structure parameters (trabecular bone volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, number of nodes/tissue volume) were significantly decreased at M12 with SrRan; none of these changes were significantly different from ALN. In conclusion, this large controlled paired biopsy study over 1 year shows that the bone formation remains higher with a lower diminution of the bone remodeling with SrRan versus ALN. From these results, SrRan did not show a significant anabolic action on bone remodeling.

ANABOLIChESKAYa TERAPIYa OSTEOPOROZA.TERIPAPARATID: EFFEKTIVNOST', BEZOPASNOST' I OBLAST' PRIMENENIYa

This review of the literature has been dedicated to experimental and clinical studies of mechanism of action and efficacy of 1—34 amino acid fragment of parathyroid hormone — teriparatide as well as others contries experience of its prescribtion. Teriparatide is an osteoanabolic agent which stimulates bone formation by affecting bone modeling and by stimulating bone remodeling. The effects on modeling lead to increased bone formation whereas the effects on bone remodeling lead to increased bone turnover. Thus, in its mode of action teriparatide differs from all others medicines currently available to treat osteoporosis. Daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide are proved to be effective to prevent low-traumatic vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with the history of vertebral fractures. Teriparatide is effective to treat osteoporosis in male and even more effective than alendronate to treat glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Due to high cost and some restriction related to the duration of therapy (up to 18 months in Russia and 24 months in others countries) teriparatide should be recommended to treat severe osteoporosis in patients with a history >1 moderate clinical vertebral fracture or two or more vertebral fragility fractures or in case the previous treatment was not effective. Teriparatide should be prescribed after bisphosphonates or other antiosteoporotic treatment, but not in the combination with bisphosphonates. The prescribtion of bisphosphonates after teriparatide is effective to maintaine and further improve the effect. Thus, teriparatide is effective to treat severe osteoporosis and osteoporosis resistant to other therapy.

Bone: Strontium ranelate does not have an anabolic effect on bone

Strontium ranelate, a therapeutic for osteoporosis, was thought to have a dual mode of action, simultaneously stimulating bone formation and reducing resorption. A recent study casts doubt on this explanation, suggesting instead that it has a mild suppressive effect on bone formation with little effect on bone resorption.

Strontium ranelate: in search for the mechanism of action

Strontium ranelate is a medicine with evidenced effects on the risk of fractures. The heterogeneity of strontium distribution in bone, quality of bone mineral crystals in young bone packets on bone surfaces formed during strontium ranelate administration, and activation of the calcium sensing receptor may, at least partially, explain the beneficial effects of SrR on reducing the risk of fractures. In this review, the concept of the dual action of strontium ranelate is also discussed. However, sufficient evidence for the bone anabolic effect of SrR does not exist in humans. The knowledge of the mechanism of action of SrR is important not only for the explanation of the effects of SrR upon the skeleton, but also for the safety of treatment for other tissues.

Accumulation of bone strontium measured by in vivo XRF in rats supplemented with strontium citrate and strontium ranelate

Strontium ranelate is an approved pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis in Europe and Australia, but not in Canada or the United States. Strontium citrate, an alternative strontium salt, however, is available for purchase over-the-counter as a nutritional supplement. The effects of strontium citrate on bone are largely unknown. The study's objectives were 1) to quantify bone strontium accumulation in female Sprague Dawley rats administered strontium citrate (N=7) and compare these levels to rats administered strontium ranelate (N=6) and vehicle (N=6) over 8 weeks, and 2) to verify an in vivo X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) system for measurement of bone strontium in the rat. Daily doses of strontium citrate and strontium ranelate were determined with the intention to achieve equivalent amounts of elemental strontium. However, post-hoc analyses of each strontium compound conducted using energy dispersive spectrometry microanalysis revealed a higher elemental strontium concentration in strontium citrate than strontium ranelate. Bone strontium levels were measured at baseline and 8 weeks follow-up using a unique in vivo XRF technique previously used in humans. XRF measurements were validated against ex vivo measurements of bone strontium using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Weight gain in rats in all three groups was equivalent over the study duration. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to compare bone strontium levels amongst the three groups. Bone strontium levels in rats administered strontium citrate were significantly greater (p<0.05) than rats administered strontium ranelate and vehicle. ANCOVA analyses were performed with Sr dose as a covariate to account for differences in strontium dosing. The ANCOVA revealed differences in bone strontium levels between the strontium groups were not significant, but that bone strontium levels were still very significantly greater than vehicle.

Comparison study of biomimetic strontium-doped calcium phosphate coatings by electrochemical deposition and air plasma spray: morphology, composition and bioactive performance

In this study, strontium-doped calcium phosphate coatings were deposited by electrochemical deposition and plasma spray under different process parameters to achieve various coating morphologies. The coating composition was investigated by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The surface morphologies of the coatings were studied through scanning electron microscopy while the cytocompatibility and bioactivity of the strontium-doped calcium phosphate coatings were evaluated using bone cell culture using MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells. The addition of strontium leads to enhanced proliferation suggesting the possible benefits of strontium incorporation in calcium phosphate coatings. The morphology and composition of deposited coatings showed a strong influence on the growth of cells.

Hip cortical thickness assessment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and strontium ranelate effect on hip geometry

The aims of this study were to assess the relationship between hip geometry and the 5-yr risk of hip fractures in postmenopausal osteoporotic women and the effects of strontium ranelate on these parameters. Using the 5-yr data of a randomized placebo-controlled trial of strontium ranelate (Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis Study [TROPOS]), we reanalyzed the hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans to determine the role of hip geometry in the risk of hip fractures (placebo group, n=636) and to analyze the effects of strontium ranelate (n=483). The outcomes included the hip structure analysis (HSA) parameters: cross-sectional area (CSA), section modulus, cortical thickness, and buckling ratio, measured at femoral neck, intertrochanteric (IT) region, and proximal shaft. The geometric parameters associated with an increased risk of hip fracture over 5yr were IT CSA and femoral shaft cortical thickness independent of age and total-hip bone mineral density (BMD). Using Bonferroni adjustment, IT cortical thickness was associated with the risk of hip fracture. Over 5yr, significant decreases in some femoral dimensions of the placebo group contrast with significant increases in strontium ranelate group after adjustment for age and BMD. Using Bonferroni adjustment, differences between placebo and strontium ranelate groups were no longer significant after adjustment on 5-yr BMD changes. Some HSA parameters have predictive value for hip fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Strontium ranelate improves some HSA parameters, through the BMD increase.

Strontium ranelate prevents bone loss in a rat model of localized muscle paralysis

Twenty-one 3.5-month-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to three groups: BTX group, in which each rat received a single intramuscular injection of 2 U of Clostridium botulinum toxin (BTX) in the quadriceps femoris muscle of the right hind limb; BTX + SR group, in which each rat received a BTX injection and a dose of strontium ranelate (dose level of 625 mg/kg/day); and the control group. All the rats were killed at 9 weeks post-treatment. It was showed that BTX-induced rats a rapid loss of body weight in the first 3 weeks, after which their body weight showed a slow increase similar to that observed in the control rats. The net body weight loss was mainly attributed to muscle atrophy. BTX caused remarkable bone degradation in either the trabecular bone or the cortical bone of the disuse femur. The deteriorations in the bone mass and bone microstructure were locally limited and could be prevented by strontium ranelate treatment. Biomechanical analysis showed that strontium ranelate treatment improved the mechanical performance of the tibia in BTX-treated rats. It was showed that a clinical-corresponding dose of strontium ranelate could prevent bone loss in long-term immobilized rats.

The effect of prior bisphosphonate therapy on the subsequent therapeutic effects of strontium ranelate over 2 years

Many osteoporotic women prescribed strontium ranelate have previously received bisphosphonates. Prior bisphosphonate use blunted the spinal bone mineral density (BMD) response for 6 months. Hip BMD was blunted to a degree for 2 years, although there was an overall increase in hip BMD in contrast to the heel where BMD did not increase.

INTRODUCTION

Many osteoporotic women commenced on strontium ranelate have already received treatment with bisphosphonates. This study investigates whether prior bisphosphonate use impairs the subsequent therapeutic response to strontium ranelate.

METHODS

Women were recruited who were either bisphosphonate naïve or currently receiving a bisphosphonate. All women received strontium ranelate and were followed up for 2 years.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty women were recruited. After 2 years, the bisphosphonate-naïve group had significant BMD increases of 8.9%, 6.0% and 6.4% at the spine, hip and heel, respectively. In the prior bisphosphonate group, BMD increased significantly at the spine (4.0%) and hip (2.5%) but not at the heel. At all time points at all sites, the BMD increase was greater in the bisphosphonate-naïve group. BMD at the spine did not increase during the first 6 months in the prior bisphosphonate group but then increased in parallel with the bisphosphonate-naïve group. In contrast, the difference between the two groups in hip BMD continued to increase throughout the 2 years. P1NP was suppressed in the prior bisphosphonate group for the first 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

After bisphosphonate exposure, the BMD response to strontium ranelate is blunted for only 6 months at the spine. At the hip, a degree of blunting was observed over 2 years, although there was an overall increase in hip BMD in contrast to the heel where no increase in BMD was observed.

The combination of structural parameters and areal bone mineral density improves relation to proximal femur strength: an in vitro study with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography

The aim of this study was to assess structural indices from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) images of the human proximal femur along with areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and compare the relationship of these parameters to bone strength in vitro. Thirty-one human proximal femur specimens (8 men and 23 women, median age 74 years, range 50-89) were examined with HR-pQCT at four regions of interest (femoral head, neck, major and minor trochanter) with 82 μm and in a subgroup (n = 17) with 41 μm resolution. Separate analyses of cortical and trabecular geometry, volumetric BMD (vBMD), and microarchitectural parameters were obtained. In addition, aBMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed at conventional hip regions and maximal compressive strength (MCS) was determined in a side-impact biomechanical test. Twelve cervical and 19 trochanteric fractures were confirmed. Geometry, vBMD, microarchitecture, and aBMD correlated significantly with MCS, with Spearman's correlation coefficients up to 0.77, 0.89, 0.90, and 0.85 (P < 0.001), respectively. No differences in these correlations were found using 41 μm compared to 82 μm resolution. In multiple regression analysis of MCS, a combined model (age- and sex-adjusted) with aBMD and structural parameters significantly increased R (2) values (up to 0.90) compared to a model holding aBMD alone (R (2) up to 0.78) (P < 0.05). Structural parameters and aBMD are equally related to MCS, and both cortical and trabecular structural parameters obtained from HR-pQCT images hold information on bone strength complementary to that of aBMD.

Trabecular reorganization in consecutive iliac crest biopsies when switching from bisphosphonate to strontium ranelate treatment

BACKGROUND

Several agents are available to treat osteoporosis while addressing patient-specific medical needs. Individuals' residual risk to severe fracture may require changes in treatment strategy. Data at osseous cellular and microstructural levels due to a therapy switch between agents with different modes of action are rare. Our study on a series of five consecutively taken bone biopsies from an osteoporotic individual over a six-year period analyzes changes in cellular characteristics, bone microstructure and mineralization caused by a therapy switch from an antiresorptive (bisphosphonate) to a dual action bone agent (strontium ranelate).

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Biopsies were progressively taken from the iliac crest of a female patient. Four biopsies were taken during bisphosphonate therapy and one biopsy was taken after one year of strontium ranelate (SR) treatment. Furthermore, serum bone markers and dual x-ray absorptiometry measurements were acquired. Undecalcified histology was used to assess osteoid parameters and bone turnover. Structural indices and degree of mineralization were determined using microcomputed tomography, quantitative backscattered electron imaging, and combined energy dispersive x-ray/µ-x-ray-fluorescence microanalysis.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

Microstructural data revealed a notable increase in bone volume fraction after one year of SR treatment compared to the bisphosphonate treatment period. Indices of connectivity density, structure model index and trabecular bone pattern factor were predominantly enhanced indicating that the architectural transformation from trabecular rods to plates was responsible for the bone volume increase and less due to changes in trabecular thickness and number. Administration of SR following bisphosphonates led to a maintained mineralization profile with an uptake of strontium on the bone surface level. Reactivated osteoclasts designed tunneling, hook-like intratrabecular resorption sites. The appearance of tunneling resorption lacunae and the formation of both mini-modeling units and osteon-like structures within increased plate-like cancellous bone mass provides additional information on the mechanisms of strontium ranelate following bisphosphonate treatment, which may deserve special attention when monitoring a treatment switch.

Strontium is incorporated into the fracture callus but does not influence the mechanical strength of healing rat fractures

Strontium ranelate (SrR) is a new agent used in the treatment of osteoporosis and is suggested to reduce bone resorption and increase bone formation. We investigated whether SrR influences the macro- and nanomechnical properties of healing fractures in rats. A closed tibia fracture model was used to study fracture healing in rats after 3 and 8 weeks of healing. Two groups of rats were treated with SrR (900 mg/kg/day) mixed into the food, while two groups served as control animals. The healing fractures were investigated by three-point bending, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and nanoindentation. There was a 100-fold increase (P < 0.001) in serum Sr after 3 and 8 weeks of SrR treatment. The callus volume was significantly higher in the SrR-treated group than in control animals (P < 0.01) after 3 weeks of healing. This was accompanied by a significant increase in callus bone mineral content (P < 0.05). However, after 8 weeks of healing, no difference was found in either callus volume or bone mineral content. SrR did not influence maximum load or stiffness of the fractures after either 3 or 8 weeks of healing. EDX showed that Sr was incorporated into the callus; however, this did not influence the nanomechanical properties. In conclusion, SrR stimulates callus formation but has no effect on callus remodeling. Sr is incorporated into the newly formed callus tissue, but this has no deteriorating effect on the mechanical properties of rat tibial fractures at either the macroscopic or nanoscopic level after 3 or 8 weeks of healing.

The effect of bone strontium on BMD is different for different manufacturers' DXA Systems

Osteoporotic patients treated with strontium ranelate show relatively large increases in bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) due to the replacement of some of the calcium atoms in bone by strontium. A study published by Pors Nielsen and colleagues reported that replacement of 1% of calcium atoms by strontium causes a 10% increase in BMD. We refer to the ratio of the percentage increase in BMD to the molar percentage of strontium in bone as the strontium ratio. Theoretically it is expected that the strontium ratio should vary between different manufacturers' DXA equipment depending on the effective photon energy of the device, an effect that arises because of the proximity of the X-ray energies produced by lower energy devices to the strontium K-edge at 16 keV. In this study we report theoretical estimates of the strontium ratio for two axial DXA systems and two peripheral DXA devices based on their broad spectrum X-ray emission. The theoretical figures were verified in an experimental study in which the strontium ratio for each device was measured using phantoms containing mixtures of hydroxyapatite and strontium hydrogen-phosphate. The theoretical values of the strontium ratio were 11.0 for the Hologic Discovery, 9.9 for the GE-Lunar Prodigy, 9.1 for the Demetech Calscan, and 8.5 for the Osteometer Dexacare G4. Experimental results were 11.2 for the Discovery, 9.9 for the Prodigy, 8.6 for the Calscan and 6.3 for the Dexacare G4. The results confirm both theoretically and experimentally that the effect of bone strontium on BMD measurements is different for different DXA systems. In the future it might be possible to exploit this effect to make a non-invasive estimate of average bone strontium content in groups of patients receiving strontium medication for osteoporosis.

Effects of long-term strontium ranelate treatment on vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

SUMMARY

Vertebral fractures are a major adverse consequence of osteoporosis. In a large placebo-controlled trial in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, strontium ranelate reduced vertebral fracture risk by 33% over 4 years, confirming the role of strontium ranelate as an effective long-term treatment in osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are associated with increased mortality, morbidity, and loss of quality-of-life (QoL). Strontium ranelate (2 g/day) was shown to prevent bone loss, increase bone strength, and reduce vertebral and peripheral fractures. The preplanned aim of this study was to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate.

METHODS

A total of 1,649 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were randomized to strontium ranelate or placebo for 4 years, followed by a 1-year treatment-switch period for half of the patients. Primary efficacy criterion was incidence of patients with new vertebral fractures over 4 years. Lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) and QoL were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Over 4 years, risk of vertebral fracture was reduced by 33% with strontium ranelate (risk reduction = 0.67, p < 0.001). Among patients with two or more prevalent vertebral fractures, risk reduction was 36% (p < 0.001). QoL, assessed by the QUALIOST(R), was significantly better (p = 0.025), and patients without back pain were greater (p = 0.005) with strontium ranelate than placebo over 4 years. Lumbar BMD increased over 5 years in patients who continued with strontium ranelate, while it decreased in patients who switched to placebo. Emergent adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

In this 4- and 5-year study, strontium ranelate is an effective and safe treatment for long-term treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Effect of long-term treatment with strontium ranelate on bone strontium content

AIM

To investigate the kinetics and magnitude of human bone strontium uptake and retention during and after long-time treatment with strontium ranelate (SrR).

METHODS

Bone strontium was measured by a novel DPA method developed by us. 32 osteoporotic female patients volunteered to participate in a 3 years open study of the effect on bone Sr. The group was treated with 2 g SrR/day, 17 of the group had received active treatment for 4-5 years before the study. DXA BMD measurements and DPA measurements of the relative bone strontium hydroxy apatite termed %Sr (SrHA/(CaHA+SrHA)) were done simultaneously ultra-distally (UD) on the non-dominant radius every six months during the study and three and six months after treatment stop.

RESULTS

The highest relative Sr content was found in patients who had been treated for 7-8 years. The variability was pronounced; a mean of 1.1 % Sr was measured at the end of treatment. No effect was demonstrated on distal radius relative bone Ca hydroxy apatite. Bone strontium uptake and retention data were compatible with a power function model. Withdrawal of SrR resulted in a decline in bone Sr, but 73 %Sr and 67 %Sr, respectively remained in UD-radius three and six months after drug withdrawal.

CONCLUSION

The rise in bone Sr content measured by DPA as well as BMD measured by DXA was most marked initially. After the treatment was stopped bone Sr decreased rapidly only during the first months. In UD-radius the apparent BMD corrected for the influence of %Sr measured by DPA showed a slight decline like in an untreated population. Strontium containing drugs may influence DXA bone mineral measurements several years after treatment withdrawal. According to the power function model the skeletal retention three and six months after stopping the treatment would average 66% and 58%, respectively after three years of treatment, and 76% and 70%, respectively after eight years of treatment. However, individual predictions are uncertain due to large inter-individual variations, and the values cannot be extrapolated to other bone sites.

Monitoring strontium ranelate therapy in patients with osteoporosis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review the monitoring of strontium ranelate osteoporosis therapy.

METHODS

The method used in this study was comprehensive literature review with clinical perspectives.

RESULTS

Changes in bone turnover markers (BTM) or bone mineral density (BMD) have been documented in osteoporosis clinical trials. However, neither BMD nor BTM changes fully explain the observed fracture risk reduction in treated patients. If changes in BMD or BTM on therapy would be easily discernable in individual patients, and were strongly associated with fracture risk reduction, monitoring individuals would be more useful. BMD changes in patients on strontium ranelate are of a greater magnitude and hence can be easily determined in an individual patient. In addition, there exists a better correlation between fracture risk reduction and increases in BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

The strong correlation between measured BMD increases and fracture risk reduction in patients on strontium ranelate therapy will be of clinical benefit to physicians wishing to evaluate both treatment persistence and fracture risk reduction.

The effects of strontium ranelate in Asian women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Taiwan. In this 12-month multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 125 women with osteoporosis were randomly given either strontium ranelate 2 g daily or placebo. Lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total-hip bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured; adverse events and tolerability were recorded and assessed. Subjects treated with strontium ranelate showed significant increases in BMD of 5.9% at the lumbar spine, 2.6% at the femoral neck, and 2.7% at the total hip, while the placebo group exhibited no significant change at 12 months. Serum level of a formation marker (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) was also significantly increased at 6 and 12 months. Thus, although the sample size and the treatment duration of this study could not show its effect of reducing osteoprotic fractures, strontium ranelate showed bone protection effects by increasing BMD and concentrations of a bone formation marker. Safety assessment revealed adverse events were mild and not significantly different from placebo.

Relationship of blood lead levels to incident nonspine fractures and falls in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures

Lead is stored in the skeleton and can serve as an endogenous source for many years. Lead may influence the risk of fracture, through direct effects on bone strength or indirectly by disturbing neuromuscular function and increasing the risk of falls. The objective of this analysis is to test the hypothesis that women with higher blood lead levels experience higher rates of falls and fracture. This was a prospective cohort study of 533 women 65-87 yr of age enrolled in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures at two U.S. research centers (Baltimore, MD; Monongahela Valley, PA) from 1986 to 1988. Blood lead levels (in microg/dl) were measured in 1990-1991 by atomic absorption spectrophotometry and classified as "low" (<or=3; lower 15th percentile, referent); "medium" (4-7); or "high" (>or=8; upper 15th percentile). Total hip BMD was measured by DXA twice, 3.55 yr apart. Information on falls was collected every 4 mo for 4 yr. Incident nonspine fractures were identified and confirmed over 10 yr. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI of fracture. Generalized estimating equations were used to calculate the incident rate ratio of falls (95% CI). The mean blood lead level was 5.3 +/- 2.3 (SD) microg/dl (range, 1-21 microg/dl). Baseline BMD was 7% lower in total hip and 5% lower in femoral neck in the highest compared with lowest blood lead group (p < 0.02). Hip bone loss tended to be greater in the high lead group, but differences were not significant. In multivariable adjusted models, women with high blood lead levels had an increased risk of nonspine fracture (HR = 2.50; 95% CI = 1.25, 5.03; p trend = 0.016) and higher risk of falls (incident rate ratio = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.07, 2.45; p trend = 0.014) compared with women with lowest lead level. Blood lead levels are associated with an increased risk of falls and fractures, extending the negative health consequences of lead to include osteoporotic fractures.

Strontium ranelate does not stimulate bone formation in ovariectomized rats

INTRODUCTION

Strontium ranelate (SrR) is suggested to function as a dual-acting agent in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with anti-resorptive and anabolic skeletal benefits. We evaluated the effects of SrR on the skeleton in ovariectomized (OVX) rats and evaluated the influence of dietary calcium.

METHODS

Three-month old virgin female rats underwent ovariectomy (OVX, n = 50) or SHAM surgery (SHAM, n = 10). Four weeks post-surgery, rats were treated daily by oral gavage with distilled water (10 ml/kg/day) or SrR (25 or 150 mg/kg/day) for 90 days. Separate groups of animals for each dose of SrR were fed a low (0.1%) or normal (1.19%) calcium (Ca) diet. Static and dynamic histomorphometry, DXA, mu-CT, mechanical testing, and serum and skeletal concentrations of strontium were assessed.

RESULTS

SrR at doses of 25 and 150 mg/kg/day did not increase bone formation on trabecular or periosteal bone surfaces, and failed to inhibit bone resorption of trabecular bone regardless of Ca intake. There were no improvements in bone mass, volume or strength with either dose of SrR given normal Ca.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that SrR at dosages of 25 and 150 mg/kg/day did not stimulate an anabolic bone response, and failed to improve the bone biomechanical properties of OVX rats.

Comparative effects of antiresorptive agents on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a common clinical entity; its complications represent a significant burden to society. In recent years the choice of therapies available for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis has increased dramatically. There are a number of antiresorptive agents currently available including hormone replacement therapy (HRT), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), bisphosphonates, and dual action bone agents. It is difficult to truly compare these therapies given the lack of direct head-to head studies. The efficacy of antiresorptive therapies can be assessed in a number of ways including measurement of bone mineral density (BMD), assessment of bone turnover markers, and fracture reduction. Other important factors include ease of administration and consequent patient compliance. This article reviews the currently available antiresorptive agents and their effects on the above outcome measures.

Relationship between change in femoral neck bone mineral density and hip fracture incidence during treatment with strontium ranelate

OBJECTIVE

Strontium ranelate (SR) increases bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal osteoporotic women and reduces vertebral and non-vertebral fracture incidence. Hip fracture reduction has also been observed during 3-year treatment with SR in osteoporotic women at high risk of hip fracture. The objective of this study is to analyse the association between BMD changes and hip fracture incidence during treatment with SR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this post-hoc analysis, 465 women aged over 74 years with low BMD at the femoral neck (T-score < or = -2.4 according to NHANES normative values) were selected from the population of a recently published study (the Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis Study - TROPOS). BMD was assessed at the femoral neck at baseline and after a follow-up of 3 years. Hip fractures were reported by study investigators.

RESULTS

After adjusting for age, body mass index, femoral neck BMD at baseline and number of prevalent vertebral fractures, we found that for each 1% increase in femoral neck BMD observed after 3 years, the risk to experience a hip fracture after 3 years decreased by 7% (95% CI: 1-14%) (p = 0.04). In patients experiencing a hip fracture over 3 years of treatment with SR, femoral neck BMD increased by (mean [SE]) 3.41 (1.02)% compared to 7.23 (0.81)% in patients without hip fracture (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In this post-hoc analysis of women undergoing 3 years of SR treatment, an increase in femoral neck BMD is associated with a decrease in hip fracture incidence.

Emerging pharmacologic therapies for osteoporosis

Osteoporotic fractures are an important public health problem, contributing substantially to morbidity and mortality in an ageing world population and consuming considerable health resources. Presently available pharmacologic therapies for prevention of fragility fractures are limited in scope, efficacy and acceptability to patients. Considerable efforts are being made to develop new, more effective treatments for osteoporosis, and to refine/optimize existing therapies. These novel treatments include an expanding array of drugs that primarily inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption: estrogenic compounds, bisphosphonates, inhibitors of receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand signaling, cathepsin K inhibitors, c-src kinase inhibitors, integrin inhibitors and chloride channel inhibitors. The advent of intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) therapy has provided proof-of-principle that osteoblast-targeted (anabolic) agents can effectively prevent osteoporotic fractures, and is likely to be followed by the introduction of other therapies based on PTH (orally active PTH analogs, antagonists of the calcium sensing receptor, PTH-related peptide analogs) and/or agents that induce osteoblast anabolism by means of pathways involving key, recently identified, molecular targets (wnt-low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 signaling, sclerostin and matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein).

Relationship between bone mineral density changes and fracture risk reduction in patients treated with strontium ranelate

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to analyze the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) changes and fracture incidence during 3-yr treatment with strontium ranelate.

PATIENTS

Women from the strontium ranelate arm of the Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention study and the TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis study were evaluated.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures included BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total proximal femur assessed at baseline and after a follow-up of 1 and 3 yr; semiquantitative visual assessment of vertebral fractures; and nonvertebral fractures based on written documentation.

RESULTS

After 3 yr of strontium ranelate treatment, each percentage point increase in femoral neck and total proximal femur BMD was associated with a 3% (95% adjusted confidence interval, 1-5%) and 2% (1-4%) reduction in risk of a new vertebral fracture, respectively. The 3-yr changes in femoral neck and total proximal femur BMD explained 76% and 74%, respectively, of the reduction in vertebral fractures observed during the treatment. Three-year changes in spine BMD were not statistically associated with the incidence of new vertebral fracture (P = 0.10). No significant associations were found between 3-yr changes in BMD and incidence of new nonvertebral fractures, but a trend was found for femoral neck BMD (P = 0.09) and for total proximal femur BMD (P = 0.07). An increase in femoral neck BMD after 1 yr was significantly associated with the reduction in incidence of new vertebral fractures observed after 3 yr (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

During 3-yr strontium ranelate treatment, an increase in femoral neck BMD was associated with a proportional reduction in vertebral fracture incidence.

Strontium ranelate normalizes bone mineral density in osteopenic patients

AIMS

To assess the capacity of strontium ranelate to restore normal bone mineral density (WHO definition: T-score >or=-1) in post-menopausal osteopenic women (T-score between -1 and -2.5) at baseline.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis from SOTI and TROPOS studies of 1428 patients randomly assigned to receive either 2 g of strontium ranelate a day or placebo for three years. Bone mineral density was measured at baseline and each year for three years. Results were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

At lumbar spine, after one, two and three years of treatment with strontium ranelate, 26.4, 42.1 and 58.2% respectively of osteopenic patients normalized their bone mineral density, compared with 6.6, 8.9 and 11.9% in the placebo group (all p<0.001). At total hip, the percentage of patients normalizing their bone mineral density was 5.4, 10.0 and 19.6% in the strontium ranelate group and 1.8, 1.4 and 1.6% in the placebo one (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Strontium ranelate is able to normalize bone mineral density in a significant proportion of osteopenic patients after one, two and three years of treatment. The clinical relevance of these results should be confirmed by direct demonstration of the anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate in osteopenic patients.

The correction of BMD measurements for bone strontium content

Strontium ranelate (SR) is a new oral treatment for osteoporosis associated with large increases in bone mineral density (BMD) compared with alternative therapies such as bisphosphonates. Much of the BMD increase during SR treatment is a physical effect caused by the increased attenuation of X-rays due to the accumulation of strontium in bone tissue. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution made by bone strontium content (BSC) to the overall BMD increase by evaluating the percentage F of the BMD change explained by the physical presence of strontium in bone. A value of F less than 100% would provide evidence of the anabolic effect of SR as an additional factor contributing to the overall BMD increase. Studies of mixtures of strontium hydroxyapatite (SrHA) and calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) scanned on a variety of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems show that a 1% molar ratio of SrHA/(CaHA+SrHA) causes a 10% overestimation of BMD. The correction of spine BMD measurements for the physical effects of strontium depends on knowledge of 2 further factors: (1) bone biopsy measurements of iliac crest BSC and (2) the ratio R of BSC at the DXA site to BSC at the iliac crest measured in animal studies. We used clinical trial data and values of R(spine) measured in studies of monkeys and beagle dogs to determine values of F(spine) for 1, 2, and 3 yr treatment with SR. Based on the average value of R(spine) approximately 0.7 for male and female monkeys, we found values for F(spine) approximately 75-80% for 1, 2, and 3 yr of treatment. Using the value of R(spine) approximately 1.0 from the beagle study gave values of F(spine) approximately 100%. Although values of F(spine) as low as 40% are possible, we conclude that the most likely figure is 75% or greater. However, it is apparent that there are large uncertainties in the correction of BMD results for the effect of bone strontium and that the most important of these is the inference of BSC values at DXA scan sites from measurements of iliac crest bone biopsy specimens.

A review of strontium ranelate and its effect on DXA scans

Strontium ranelate is a new orally administered agent for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis that reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. This review article examines the evidence for the antifracture efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate treatment and discusses the effect of DXA scans, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and bone histology. In the SOTI trial, three years treatment with strontium ranelate led to a 41% reduction in vertebral fracture risk (relative risk [RR]=0.59; 95% CI: 0.48-0.73; p<0.001), while in the TROPOS study there was a 16% reduction in nonvertebral fractures (RR=0.84; 95% CI 0.702-0.995; p=0.04). Compared with alternative osteoporosis therapies, strontium ranelate treated patients show large increases in BMD coupled with comparatively modest changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone histology. While the large BMD changes provide a useful way of monitoring patients' response to treatment, it is important to appreciate that much of the increase is a purely physical effect due to the increased attenuation of X-ray when some of the calcium in bone is replaced by strontium. Strontium ranelate is a useful addition to the range of antifracture treatments available for treating postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and is the only treatment proven to be effective at preventing both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women aged 80 yr and older.

Strontium administration in young chickens improves bone volume and architecture but does not enhance bone structural and material strength

Genetic selection for rapid body growth in broiler chickens has resulted in adverse effects on the skeletal system exemplified by a higher rate of cortical fractures in leg bones. Strontium (Sr) has been reported to have beneficial effects on bone formation and strength. We supplemented the diet of 300-day-old chicks with increasing dosages of Sr (0%, 0.12%, or 0.24%) to study the capacity of the element to improve bone quality and mechanical integrity. Treatment with Sr increased cortical bone volume and reduced bone porosity as measured by micro-computed tomography. The higher level of Sr significantly reduced bone Ca content (34.7%) relative to controls (37.2%), suggesting that Sr replaced some of the Ca in bone. Material properties determined by the three-point bending test showed that bone in the Sr-treated groups withstood greater deformation prior to fracture. Load to failure and ultimate stress were similar across groups. Our results indicate that Sr treatment in rapidly growing chickens induced positive effects on bone volume but did not improve the breaking strength of long bones.

Drug insight: Existing and emerging therapies for osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a major public health problem that is characterized by microarchitectural deterioration, low bone mass, and increased risk of fractures. Currently, many women and men affected with this disease are not diagnosed or treated. As osteoporosis is often clinically silent, risk-factor assessment and measurement of BMD are needed to identify those who may benefit from osteoporosis therapy. Although adequate daily intake of calcium and vitamin D, and regular weight-bearing exercise are important for skeletal health, they are not adequate treatments for individuals with osteoporosis. Therapies approved for treatment and/or prevention of osteoporosis in the United States include oral bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate and risedronate), calcitonin, estrogens, teriparatide (parathyroid hormone fragment [1-34]), and raloxifene. For most patients, oral bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice, given the large-scale randomized-trial data demonstrating efficacy in fracture reduction, although bisphosphonates that reduce spine and nonspine fractures (e.g. alendronate and risedronate) are preferred. For high-risk patients (those with very low bone density, or with fractures), teriparatide therapy for 2 years should be considered. The treatment paradigm for osteoporosis will evolve further as promising new treatments progress through clinical development.

Effect of bone strontium on BMD measurements

Strontium ranelate is a new treatment for osteoporosis that is of interest for, among other reasons, its unusual effect on measurements of bone mineral density (BMD). When some of the calcium in bone is replaced by strontium, X-ray absorptiometry measurements of BMD are overestimated because strontium attenuates X-rays more strongly than calcium. In this study, we report the first theoretical estimation of this effect for measurements made using axial (spine and hip) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), peripheral DXA (pDXA), and single-energy quantitative computed tomography (SEQCT). Tables of X-ray attenuation coefficients were used to calculate values of the strontium ratio defined as the ratio of the percentage overestimation of BMD to the molar percentage of strontium (%Sr/[Ca+Sr]) in bone. For DXA measurements, the theoretical value of the strontium ratio increased slightly with increasing effective photon energy of the X-ray beam with figures of 9.0 for Osteometer DTX200 and G4 pDXA devices (Osteometer Meditech Inc., Hawthorne, CA), 10.0 for GE-Lunar DPX and Prodigy DXA systems (GE-Lunar, Madison, WI), 10.4 for Hologic QDR1000 and QDR2000, and 10.8 for Hologic QDR4500 and Discovery (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA). Results for SEQCT also varied with the effective photon energy with strontium ratios of 6.2 at 60 keV and 4.4 at 80 keV. The results of the theoretical study are in good agreement with the experimental value of 10 reported by Pors Nielsen and colleagues for a variety of different axial DXA systems. A reliable figure for the strontium ratio is important for adjusting BMD measurements in strontium ranelate treated patients for the effect of bone strontium content. This latter correction will be required for the interpretation of future DXA scans in patients who have discontinued strontium ranelate treatment.

Effects of strontium on bone strength, density, volume, and microarchitecture in laying hens

Strontium has been reported to have beneficial effects on bone. Treatment of laying hens, which are susceptible to osteoporosis and bone fracture, with strontium increased DXA measurements of BMD and BMC and microCT measurements of bone volume and microarchitecture and improved the mechanical performance of whole bone, but had no effect on the estimated material properties of the bone tissue.

INTRODUCTION

Strontium (Sr) has been reported to dissociate bone remodeling and have positive influences on bone formation. We supplemented the diet of laying hens, which are susceptible to osteoporosis and bone fracture, with Sr to study the capacity of the element to improve bone mechanical integrity and resistance to fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Increasing dosages of Sr (0, 3000, 4500, and 6000 ppm) were fed to 196 13-week-old pullets for 11 months. BMD and BMC, as measured by conventional and DXA methods, microarchitectural parameters derived from microCT, and structural and material properties as determined by three-point bending test, were studied. Calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and Sr levels in plasma and bone, as well as egg output, shell quality, and composition, were assessed.

RESULTS

Sr concentrations in plasma and bone increased in a dose-dependent manner without affecting Ca and P. Treatment with Sr increased BMD and BMC as measured by DXA, increased cortical and medullary bone volume, trabecular thickness, number, and surface, and improved whole bone ultimate load, but had no effect on the estimated material properties of diaphyseal bone. Sr also increased the ash content of eggshells and did not affect egg output and shell quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Sr supplementation induced large positive effects on bone density, volume, and microarchitecture as measured by radiographic methods. Sr treatment also improved the structural strength of diaphyseal bone but had no effect on the estimated material properties of the bone tissue.

Theoretical model for the interpretation of BMD scans in patients stopping strontium ranelate treatment

Strontium ranelate is a new treatment for osteoporosis that results in large increases in BMD, much of which is an artefact caused by high bone strontium content. We used clinical trial data and a model of long-term strontium kinetics to estimate the effect of past strontium treatment on future BMD measurements.

INTRODUCTION

The oral administration of strontium ranelate causes a clinically significant overestimation of BMD because of the high attenuation of X-rays by strontium atoms in bone. As more patients are treated with strontium ranelate, questions will arise about the correct interpretation of their future BMD measurements. We performed a theoretical study to calculate the long-term effect of strontium treatment on BMD and establish the duration of past treatment for which the remaining bone strontium content (BSC) has a negligible effect on BMD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The BMD changes measured at the spine and hip during strontium ranelate treatment were interpolated from clinical trial data. The long-term retention of strontium in bone was estimated using the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) strontium retention function modified for use in postmenopausal women. Estimates of the strontium BMD artefact after treatment has stopped were performed on the assumption that the BSC effect accounts for 75% of the total measured BMD change at 3 years.

RESULTS

If 75% of the BMD changes are explained by BSC, in the average patient, 3-year treatment leads to a spine BMD artefact of 11.2%, decreasing to 3.8% 10 years after stopping treatment. The BMD artefacts at the total hip and femoral neck sites are smaller by factors of 0.65 and 0.53, respectively. If pre- and post-therapy BMD measurements are available, these predictions can be tailored to the individual patient. On average, 6-month treatment is required for the spine BMD artefact to exceed 3%, the figure adopted as the maximum BMD change caused by bone strontium that has a negligible effect on scan interpretation. Ten years after stopping treatment, 28 months of treatment are required for the residual BMD artefact to still exceed the 3% threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Strontium ranelate treatment lasting for >6 months can affect BMD measurements for many years afterward.

Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women eighty years of age and older

Strontium ranelate produces an early and sustained reduction of both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in patients > or = 80 years of age.

INTRODUCTION

About 25-30% of the population burden of all fragility fractures in the community arise from women > or = 80 years of age, because this population is at high risk for all types of fracture, particularly nonvertebral fractures. Despite this, evidence that therapies reduce the risk of both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in this group is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine whether strontium ranelate, an agent that reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women >50 years of age, also reduces fractures in the elderly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An analysis based on preplanned pooling of data from two international, phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies (the Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention [SOTI] and TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis [TROPOS]) included 1488 women between 80 and 100 years of age followed for 3 years. Yearly spinal X-rays were performed in 895 patients. Only radiographically confirmed nonvertebral fractures were included.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics did not differ in placebo and treatment arms. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and clinical (symptomatic vertebral and nonvertebral) fractures was reduced within 1 year by 59% (p = 0.002), 41% (p = 0.027), and 37% (p = 0.012), respectively. At the end of 3 years, vertebral, nonvertebral, and clinical fracture risks were reduced by 32% (p = 0.013), 31% (p = 0.011), and 22% (p = 0.040), respectively. The medication was well tolerated, and the safety profile was similar to that in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with strontium ranelate safely reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with osteoporosis > or = 80 years of age. Even in the oldest old, it is not too late to reduce fracture risk.

Vertebral fracture risk reduction with strontium ranelate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is independent of baseline risk factors

Strontium ranelate (2 g/day) was studied in 5082 postmenopausal women. A reduction in incident vertebral fracture risk by 40% was shown after 3 years. This effect was independent of age, initial BMD, and prevalent vertebral fractures.

INTRODUCTION

Strontium ranelate is an orally active treatment able to decrease the risk of vertebral and hip fractures in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of strontium ranelate according to the main determinants of vertebral fracture risk: age, baseline BMD, prevalent fractures, family history of osteoporosis, baseline BMI, and addiction to smoking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We pooled data of two large multinational randomized double-blind studies with a population of 5082 (2536 receiving strontium ranelate 2 g/day and 2546 receiving a placebo), 74 years of age on average, and a 3-year follow-up. An intention-to-treat principle was used, as well as a Cox model for comparison and relative risks.

RESULTS

The treatment decreased the risk of both vertebral (relative risk [RR] = 0.60 [0.53-0.69] p < 0.001) and nonvertebral (RR = 0.85 [0.74-0.99] p = 0.03) fractures. The decrease in risk of vertebral fractures was 37% (p = 0.003) in women <70 years, 42% (p < 0.001) for those 70-80 years of age, and 32% (p = 0.013) for those > or = 80 years. The RR of vertebral fracture was 0.28 (0.07-0.99) in osteopenic and 0.61 (0.53-0.70) in osteoporotic women, and baseline BMD was not a determinant of efficacy. The incidence of vertebral fractures in the placebo group increased with the number of prevalent vertebral fractures, but this was not a determinant of the effect of strontium ranelate. In 2605 patients, the risk of experiencing a first vertebral fracture was reduced by 48% (p < 0.001). The risk of experiencing a second vertebral fracture was reduced by 45% (p < 0.001; 1100 patients). Moreover, the risk of experiencing more than two vertebral fractures was reduced by 33% (p < 0.001; 1365 patients). Family history of osteoporosis, baseline BMI, and addiction to smoking were not determinants of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a 3-year treatment with strontium ranelate leads to antivertebral fracture efficacy in postmenopausal women independently of baseline osteoporotic risk factors.

Strontium ranelate--data on vertebral and nonvertebral fracture efficacy and safety: mechanism of action

Strontium ranelate is a novel therapy for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with actions to reduce bone resorption and increase bone formation. In vitro, strontium ranelate has anabolic and antiresorptive activity, increasing collagen and non-collagen protein synthesis, enhancing pre-osteoblast differentiation, inhibiting osteoclast differentiation, and reducing osteoclast function. In animal models, the increase in bone density is closely correlated with increases in biomechanical bone strength. Histomorphometry demonstrates reduced osteoclast surfaces with increased bone formation. Clinical trials in postmenopausal women have demonstrated 3-year fracture efficacy. Reductions in vertebral fracture were seen in patients with and without prevalent vertebral fracture. Nonvertebral fractures were also significantly reduced. In a subgroup of patients at high risk for hip fracture, there was a significant reduction in hip fracture risk. Strontium ranelate is well tolerated with nausea, diarrhea, headache, and dermatitis more frequent in treated patients only for the first 3 months of therapy. Together, these data suggest that strontium ranelate is a well-tolerated and effective therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis reducing vertebral and nonvertebral fracture by a novel dual antiresorptive and anabolic action on bone.

Strontium ranelate: an increased bone quality leading to vertebral antifracture efficacy at all stages

Strontium ranelate is a new antiosteoporotic treatment with a dual mode of action, both increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, which rebalances bone turnover in favor of bone formation and increases bone strength. The antifracture efficacy of strontium ranelate, 2 g per day orally, in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis has been investigated in a large-scale, international, multicenter, phase 3 program in which more than 7000 patients were recruited. This article deals with the vertebral antifracture efficacy of strontium ranelate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A significant early (after 1 year) and sustained (over 3 years) antifracture efficacy of strontium ranelate, compared with placebo, was demonstrated in patients with prevalent vertebral fracture with reductions in risk of new vertebral fracture of 49% after 1 year (P < 0.001) and 41% over 3 years (P < 0.001). In addition, the relative risk of clinical vertebral fracture was significantly reduced by 52% (P = 0.003) after 1 year and by 38% (P < 0.001) over 3 years in the strontium ranelate group compared with placebo. Strontium ranelate was also demonstrated to significantly decrease the relative risk of vertebral fractures by 45% (P < 0.001) in patients without prevalent vertebral fracture over 3 years, vs. placebo. Bone mineral density was linearly increased during 3 years of treatment with strontium ranelate in comparison with placebo. Strontium ranelate was well tolerated throughout the entire duration of the clinical trials. Thus, strontium ranelate, 2 g per day orally, is a new, effective, and safe treatment for postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis, to reduce the vertebral fracture risk in patients with or without a history of vertebral fracture.