Activation of transcription in vitro by recruitment of the yeast RNA polymerase II holoenzyme

p53 activates transcription by directing structural shifts in Mediator

It is not well understood how the human Mediator complex, transcription factor IIH and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) work together with activators to initiate transcription. Activator binding alters Mediator structure, yet the functional consequences of such structural shifts remain unknown. The p53 C terminus and its activation domain interact with different Mediator subunits, and we find that each interaction differentially affects Mediator structure; strikingly, distinct p53-Mediator structures differentially affect Pol II activity. Only the p53 activation domain induces the formation of a large pocket domain at the Mediator-Pol II interaction site, and this correlates with activation of stalled Pol II to a productively elongating state. Moreover, we define a Mediator requirement for TFIIH-dependent Pol II C-terminal domain phosphorylation and identify substantial differences in Pol II C-terminal domain processing that correspond to distinct p53-Mediator structural states. Our results define a fundamental mechanism by which p53 activates transcription and suggest that Mediator structural shifts trigger activation of stalled Pol II complexes.

Phosphorylation of the Gal4 DNA-binding domain is essential for activator mono-ubiquitylation and efficient promoter occupancy

Recent analysis of a Gal4 mutant (Gap71) carrying three point mutations (S22D, K23Q and K25F) in its DNA-binding domain (DBD), has demonstrated that it cannot occupy GAL promoters efficiently in cells and that it is not mono-ubiquitylated, suggesting a functional link between this modification and stable DNA binding in cells. The mechanistic underpinning of this phenotype is that this protein is hypersensitive to a newly discovered activity of the proteasomal ATPases--their ability to actively dissociate transcription factor-DNA complexes after direct interaction with the activation domain. In this paper, we examine the roles of each of the three point mutations contained in Gap71 individually. These experiments have revealed that serine 22 is a site of phosphorylation in the Gal4 DBD and that lysine 23 is essential for S22 phosphorylation, possibly acting as part of the kinase recognition site. Mutation of either residue blocks Gal4 DBD phosphorylation, its subsequent ubiquitylation and compromises the ability of the activator to bind promoter DNA in vivo. These data represent the first report of an essential phosphorylation event that is critical for the activity of this paradigmatic transcription factor.

Structural basis for dimerization in DNA recognition by Gal4

Gal4 is a Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster containing transcription factor that binds DNA as a homodimer and can activate transcription by interacting with the mutant Gal11P protein. Although structures have been reported of the Gal4 dimerization domain and the binuclear cluster domain bound to DNA as a dimer, the structure of the "complete" Gal4 dimer bound to DNA has not previously been described. Here we report the structure of a complete Gal4 dimer bound to DNA and additional biochemical studies to address the molecular basis for Gal4 dimerization in DNA binding. We find that Gal4 dimerization on DNA is mediated by an intertwined helical bundle that deviates significantly from the solution NMR structure of the free dimerization domain. Associated biochemical studies show that the dimerization domain of Gal4 is important for DNA binding and protein thermostability. We also map the interaction surface of the Gal4 dimerization domain with Gal11P.

Targeted activation of transcription in vivo through hairpin-triplex forming oligonucleotide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Triplex forming oligonucleotides (TFO) are known to be potential agents for modifying gene function. In most instances they are utilized for repression of transcription. However hybrid molecules containing cis-acting elements in a duplex DNA in a hairpin form contiguously with the TFO can bind transcription factors in vitro. In the present manuscript we demonstrate that hairpin-TFO can be employed in vivo for targeted activation of gene expression of two genes mapping on chromosome XI of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The cis-acting GAL4 protein-binding site contained in the hairpin-TFO is targeted in vivo to the 5' upstream sequence of STE6 and CBT1 genes that are transcribed in opposite directions and share a poly(pu/py) sequence that can form triple helical structure. The hairpin-TFO is targeted to this site and promotes the activation of both the genes. These results demonstrate four important aspects relating to activation of gene expression: (i) accessibility of duplex DNA packaged into chromatin to triplex forming sequences in vivo, (ii) the potential use of hairpin-TFO in therapeutics by activation of transcription in vivo, (iii) Sharing of transcription factors between two genes transcribed in opposite directions and (iv) specific activation of genes even when their cognate site is not covalently linked to the gene being activated.

Preponderance of Free Mediator in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Biochemical evidence suggesting that the predominant form of Mediator in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae might be one in which the complex is associated with RNA polymerase II to form a holoenzyme has led to the proposition of a holoenzyme-based model for transcription initiation. We report that polymerase-free Mediator, isolated early on during a whole-cell extract fractionation protocol, is in fact the most abundant form of the Mediator complex. The existence of free Mediator would make possible independent recruitment of Mediator and RNA polymerase II to the pre-initiation complex. This is in agreement with reports from in vivo studies of time and spatial independence of Mediator and RNA polymerase II promoter interaction, with current models of pre-initiation complex structure in which promoter DNA upstream of the transcription start site is positioned between Mediator and polymerase, and with the proposed role of Mediator as the major component of the Scaffold complex involved in transcription reinitiation.

Assembly of a mediator/TFIID/TFIIA complex bypasses the need for an activator

Transcription in eukaryotic cells requires the remodeling of chromatin and the assembly of functional preinitiation complexes (PICs), which contain the general transcription factors (GTFs), RNA polymerase II (Pol II), and coactivators. Genetic and biochemical studies have implicated the multisubunit Mediator coactivator complex (Med) as a critical component of the PIC, a direct target of activators, and a checkpoint for regulated gene expression during differentiation, development (reviewed in ), signaling, and oncogenesis. In this report, we show that a complex containing the activator GAL4-VP16, Med, and TFIID/TFIIA (DA) recruits pol II and the remaining GTFs to a model promoter in vitro. A preassembled DAMed complex bypasses the requirement for an activator. We also demonstrate that coordinated assembly of DAMed is essential to establishing a functional PIC. We conclude that the DAMed complex generates a platform that supports activated levels of PIC assembly and transcription.

The role of TFIIB-RNA polymerase II interaction in start site selection in yeast cells

Previous studies have established a critical role of both TFIIB and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) in start site selection in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, it remains unclear how the TFIIB-RNAPII interaction impacts on this process since such an interaction can potentially influence both preinitiation complex (PIC) stability and conformation. In this study, we further investigate the role of TFIIB in start site selection by characterizing our newly generated TFIIB mutants, two of which exhibit a novel upstream shift of start sites in vivo. We took advantage of an artificial recruitment system in which an RNAPII holoenzyme component is covalently linked to a DNA-binding domain for more direct and stable recruitment. We show that TFIIB mutations can exert their effects on start site selection in such an artificial recruitment system even though it has a relaxed requirement for TFIIB. We further show that these TFIIB mutants have normal affinity for RNAPII and do not alter the promoter melting/scanning step. Finally, we show that overexpressing the genetically isolated TFIIB mutant E62K, which has a reduced affinity for RNAPII, can correct its start site selection defect. We discuss a model in which the TFIIB-RNAPII interaction controls the start site selection process by influencing the conformation of PIC prior to or during PIC assembly, as opposed to PIC stability.

The TBP-inhibitory domain of TAF145 limits the effects of nonclassical transcriptional activators

Many genes in bacteria and eukaryotes are activated by "regulated recruitment". According to that picture, a transcriptional activator binds cooperatively to DNA with the transcriptional machinery, and the constitutively active polymerase then spontaneously transcribes the gene. An important class of experiments that helped develop this model is called the "activator by-pass" experiment. In one version of such an experiment, the ordinary activator-transcriptional machinery interaction is replaced by a heterologous interaction. For example, fusing any of several DNA binding domains to Gal11, a component of the yeast mediator complex, creates a powerful activator of genes bearing the corresponding DNA binding sites. Here, we describe a simple modification of the yeast transcriptional machinery that extends the success of similar experiments involving other mediator components. The results reinforce parallels between regulation of enzymes involved in transcription and in other cellular processes.

RNA polymerase II and III transcription factors can stimulate DNA replication by modifying origin chromatin structures

Many transcription factors are multifunctional and also influence DNA replication. So far, their mechanism of action has remained elusive. Here we show that a DNA-binding protein could rely on the same biochemical activity that activates transcription to stimulate replication from the yeast chromosomal ARS1 origin. Unexpectedly, the ability to stimulate replication from this origin was not restricted to polymerase II transcription factors, but was a property shared by polymerase III factors. Furthermore, activation of replication did not depend on the process of transcription, but rather on the ability of DNA-binding transcription factors to remodel chromatin. The natural ARS1 activator Abf1 and the other transcription factors that stimulated replication remodeled chromatin in a very similar manner. Moreover, the presence of a histone H3 mutant that was previously shown to generally increase transcription also facilitated replication from ARS1 and partially compensated for the absence of a transcription factor. We propose that multifunctional transcription factors work by influencing the chromatin architecture at replication origins so as to generate a structure that is favorable to the initiation of replication.

How transcriptional activators bind target proteins

The product of the proto-oncogene c-myc influences many cellular processes through the regulation of specific target genes. Through its transactivation domain (TAD), c-Myc protein interacts with several transcription factors, including TATA-binding protein (TBP). We present data that suggest that in contrast to some other transcriptional activators, an extended length of the c-Myc TAD is required for its binding to TBP. Our data also show that this interaction is a multistep process, in which a rapidly forming low affinity complex slowly converts to a more stable form. The initial complex formation results from ionic or polar interactions, whereas the slow conversion to a more stable form is hydrophobic in nature. Based on our results, we suggest two alternative models for activation domain/target protein interactions, which together provide a single universal paradigm for understanding activator-target factor interactions.

Recruitment of the transcriptional machinery through GAL11P: structure and interactions of the GAL4 dimerization domain

The GAL4 dimerization domain (GAL4-dd) is a powerful transcriptional activator when tethered to DNA in a cell bearing a mutant of the GAL11 protein, named GAL11P. GAL11P (like GAL11) is a component of the RNA-polymerase II holoenzyme. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies of GAL4-dd revealed an elongated dimer structure with C(2) symmetry containing three helices that mediate dimerization via coiled-coil contacts. The two loops between the three coiled coils form mobile bulges causing a variation of twist angles between the helix pairs. Chemical shift perturbation analysis mapped the GAL11P-binding site to the C-terminal helix alpha3 and the loop between alpha1 and alpha2. One GAL11P monomer binds to one GAL4-dd dimer rendering the dimer asymmetric and implying an extreme negative cooperativity mechanism. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of GAL4-dd showed that the NMR-derived GAL11P-binding face is crucial for the novel transcriptional activating function of the GAL4-dd on GAL11P interaction. The binding of GAL4 to GAL11P, although an artificial interaction, represents a unique structural motif for an activating region capable of binding to a single target to effect gene expression.

Transcription of eukaryotic protein-coding genes

The past decade has seen an explosive increase in information about regulation of eukaryotic gene transcription, especially for protein-coding genes. The most striking advances in our knowledge of transcriptional regulation involve the chromatin template, the large complexes recruited by transcriptional activators that regulate chromatin structure and the transcription apparatus, the holoenzyme forms of RNA polymerase II involved in initiation and elongation, and the mechanisms that link mRNA processing with its synthesis. We describe here the major advances in these areas, with particular emphasis on the modular complexes associated with RNA polymerase II that are targeted by activators and other regulators of mRNA biosynthesis.

Distinct cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) domains stimulate different steps in a concerted mechanism of transcription activation

Hormones and neurotransmitters rapidly change patterns of gene expression in target cells by activating protein kinases that phosphorylate and modify the activity of CREB and other transcription factors. Although CREB was initially characterized as mediating the response to cAMP, CREB phosphorylation and activation are stimulated by diverse extracellular signals and protein kinases in essentially all cells and tissues. CREB stimulates transcription through a constitutive activation domain (CAD), which interacts with the promoter recognition factor TFIID, and through a kinase-inducible domain (KID), when Ser-133 is phosphorylated. The present study provides new insight into the mechanism of activation by showing that each of the CREB domains contributes to transcription initiation by stimulating sequential steps in the transcription reaction. The CAD effectively assembled a polymerase complex, as evidenced by constitutive activation in vivo and stimulation of single-round transcription in vitro. In contrast, phosphorylation of the KID in CREB stimulated isomerization of the polymerase complex, as determined by abortive initiation, and promoter clearance and/or reinitiation, as measured by multiple rounds of transcription. Our results provide evidence for a new model for CREB-mediated induction through a concerted mechanism involving establishment of a polymerase complex by the CAD, followed by stimulation of isomerization, promoter clearance, and/or reinitiation by phosphorylated KID to enhance target gene transcription.

Discrete promoter elements affect specific properties of RNA polymerase II transcription complexes

The frequency of transcription initiation at specific RNA polymerase II promoters is, in many cases, related to the ability of the promoter to recruit the transcription machinery to a specific site. However, there may also be functional differences in the properties of assembled transcription complexes that are promoter-specific or regulator-dependent and affect their activity. Transcription complexes formed on variants of the adenovirus major late (AdML) promoter were found to differ in several ways. Mutations in the initiator element increased the sarkosyl sensitivity of the rate of elongation and decreased the rate of early steps in initiation as revealed by a sarkosyl challenge assay that exploited the resistance of RNA synthesis to high concentrations of sarkosyl after formation of one or two phospho-diester bonds. Similar, but clearly distinct, effects were also observed after deletion of the binding site for upstream stimulatory factor from the AdML promoter. In contrast, deletion of binding sites for nuclear factor 1 and Oct-1, as well as mutations in the recognition sequence for initiation site binding protein, were without apparent effect on transcription complexes on templates containing the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter.

Hrs1/Med3 is a Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor target in the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme

The Srb/Mediator, a multisubunit subcomplex of the RNA polymerase II (RNA pol II) holoenzyme has been proposed to function as a control panel regulating transcription in response to gene-specific activator proteins. In this report, we identify the Mediator subunit Hrs1/Med3 as a physical target for Cyc8-Tup1, a yeast transcriptional corepressor. Two-hybrid and glutathione S-transferase interaction assays show that Hrs1 can associate directly with Cyc8-Tup1. Moreover, affinity chromatography experiments, using yeast protein extracts, reveal that Cyc8-Tup1 co-purifies with Hrs1 and with additional Mediator subunits in a Hrs1-dependent manner. These observations suggest that Cyc8-Tup1 contacts the Mediator complex via its interaction with the Hrs1 subunit. Further on, genetic analysis indicates that increased Hrs1 dosage can alleviate Cyc8-Tup1-mediated repression, suggesting that Hrs1/Mediator's function is inhibited upon its interaction with Cyc8-Tup1. Finally, artificial holoenzyme recruitment assays support a model by which the contact between the corepressor and the Hrs1/Mediator may prevent pol II holoenzyme recruitment to the core promoter. These data, together with previous genetic evidence, establish a functional and physical interaction between the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor and the RNA pol II holoenzyme and support a central role of the Mediator complex in transcriptional repression.

The conformation of the transcription factor TFIIB modulates the response to transcriptional activators in vivo

The general transcription factor TFIIB plays a crucial role in the assembly of the transcriptional preinitiation complex and has also been proposed as a target of transcriptional activator proteins (reviewed in [1]). TFIIB is composed of two domains which are engaged in an intramolecular interaction that is disrupted upon interaction with the activation domain of the Herpesvirus VP16 protein in vitro [2] [3]. The significance of this event for transcriptional activation is not known, however. The amino-terminal intramolecular interaction domain is the most conserved region of TFIIB and plays a role in transcription start-site selection [4] [5] [6]. In addition, we have shown previously that the integrity of this region is required for transcriptional activation in vivo [4]. Here, we have defined a charge cluster at the amino terminus of TFIIB that is required for transcriptional activation in vivo. We found that this domain determines the affinity of the TFIIB intramolecular interaction and the ability of TFIIB to interact with a transcriptional activation domain, but not with components of the holoenzyme. Our results suggest that the intramolecular interaction in TFIIB regulates transcriptional activation in vivo.

TATA-binding protein mutants that increase transcription from enhancerless and repressed promoters in vivo

Using a genetic screen, we isolated three TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutants that increase transcription from promoters that are repressed by the Cyc8-Tup1 or Sin3-Rpd3 corepressors or that lack an enhancer element, but not from an equivalently weak promoter with a mutated TATA element. Increased transcription is observed when the TBP mutants are expressed at low levels in the presence of wild-type TBP. These TBP mutants are unable to support cell viability, and they are toxic in strains lacking Rpd3 histone deacetylase or when expressed at higher levels. Although these mutants do not detectably bind TATA elements in vitro, genetic and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that they act directly at promoters and do not increase transcription by titration of a negative regulatory factor(s). The TBP mutants are mildly defective for associating with promoters responding to moderate or strong activators; in addition, they are severely defective for RNA polymerase (Pol) III but not Pol I transcription. These results suggest that, with respect to Pol II transcription, the TBP mutants specifically increase expression from core promoters. Biochemical analysis indicates that the TBP mutants are unaffected for TFIID complex formation, dimerization, and interactions with either the general negative regulator NC2 or the N-terminal inhibitory domain of TAF130. We speculate that these TBP mutants have an unusual structure that allows them to preferentially access TATA elements in chromatin templates. These TBP mutants define a criterion by which promoters repressed by Cyc8-Tup1 or Sin3-Rpd3 resemble enhancerless, but not TATA-defective, promoters; hence, they support the idea that these corepressors inhibit the function of activator proteins rather than the Pol II machinery.

An artificial transcriptional activating region with unusual properties

We describe a series of transcriptional activators generated by adding amino acids (eight in one case, six in another) to fragments of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae activator Gal4 that dimerize and bind DNA. One of the novel activating regions identified by this procedure is unusual, compared with previously characterized yeast activating regions, in the following ways: it works more strongly than does Gal4's natural activating region as assayed in yeast; it is devoid of acidic residues; and several lines of evidence suggest that it sees targets in the yeast transcriptional machinery at least partially distinct from those seen by Gal4's activating region.

A general strategy to enhance the potency of chimeric transcriptional activators

Efforts to increase the potency of transcriptional activators are generally unsuccessful because poor expression of activators in mammalian cells limits their delivery to target promoters. Here we report that the effectiveness of chimeric activators can be dramatically improved by expressing them as noncovalent tetrameric bundles. Bundled activation domains are much more effective at activating a reporter gene than simple monomeric activators, presumably because, at similar expression levels, up to 4 times as many the activation domains are delivered to the target promoter. These bundled activation domains are also more effective than proteins in which activation domains are tandemly reiterated in the same polypeptide chain, because such proteins are very poorly expressed and therefore not delivered effectively. These observations suggest that there is a threshold number of activation domains that must be bound to a promoter for activation, above which promoter activity is simply a function of the number of activators bound. We show that bundling can be exploited practically to enhance the sensitivity of mammalian two-hybrid assays, enabling detection of weak interactions or those between poorly expressed proteins. Bundling also dramatically improves the performance of a small-molecule-regulated gene expression system when the expression level of regulatory protein is limiting, a situation that may be encountered in gene therapy applications.

Different upstream transcriptional activators have distinct coactivator requirements

Activated transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) requires coactivators, one of which is the SRB/mediator. Whereas Srb4, an essential subunit of the SRB/mediator, is broadly required for Pol II transcription in yeast, we have shown that it is dispensable for the transcriptional activation of some genes. Here, we show that transcriptional activation by different natural activators, and by artificial recruitment of various transcription factors, have very different degrees of Srb4 independence. These data, and the analysis of an rgr1 mutant, point to an Rgr1 subcomplex of the SRB/mediator as the mechanistic route of activation by Srb4-independent activators in vivo.

Conserved cAMP responsive element and core promoter complex are critical for specificity of the distal T-cell receptor beta chain enhancer for its native promoter

The Vbeta 8.1 promoter is regulated by T-cell-specific and ubiquitous transcription factors, which bind immediately upstream of and inside the core promoter region. The various Vbeta promoters contain two conserved elements, a cAMP responsive element (CRE) located upstream of the core promoter and a basal initiator flanked by two regulatory motifs. Here we have studied the interplay between the distal enhancer and its native promoter. We show that the remote enhancer acts specifically through its native promoter. Specific enhancer-promoter interplay is mediated through the conserved regions of the Vbeta promoters. Importantly, the conserved CRE serves as a functional recognition element for the enhancer whereas it barely contributes to promoter activity. The other conserved regions surrounding the initiation site are critical for activators that bind at and function through the core promoter region and thereby regulate both promoter and enhancer activity. The enhancer is highly sensitive to E1A-12S, which represses both general and specific enhancer activities. Enhancer activity and promoter-enhancer specificity is, at least in part, mediated by the coactivators CBP/p300.

Transcriptional cofactor CA150 regulates RNA polymerase II elongation in a TATA-box-dependent manner

Tat protein strongly activates transcription from the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) long terminal repeat (LTR) by enhancing the elongation efficiency of RNA polymerase II complexes. Tat-mediated transcriptional activation requires cellular cofactors and specific cis-acting elements within the HIV-1 promoter, among them a functional TATA box. Here, we have investigated the mechanism by which one of these cofactors, termed CA150, regulates HIV-1 transcription in vivo. We present a series of functional assays that demonstrate that the regulation of the HIV-1 LTR by CA150 has the same functional requirements as the activation by Tat. We found that CA150 affects elongation of transcription complexes assembled on the HIV-1 promoter in a TATA-box-dependent manner. We discuss the data in terms of the involvement of CA150 in the regulation of Tat-activated HIV-1 gene expression. In addition, we also provide evidence suggesting a role for CA150 in the regulation of cellular transcriptional processes.

Activation of DNA replication in yeast by recruitment of the RNA polymerase II transcription complex

Activators of transcription are known to also play an important and direct role in activating DNA replication. However, the mechanism whereby they stimulate replication has remained elusive. One model suggests that, in the context of replication origins, transcriptional activators work by interacting with replication factors. We show that a defined, single interaction between a DNA-bound derivative of the activator Gal4 and Gal11P, a mutant form of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme component Gal11, suffices for stimulating DNA replication as it does for transcription. Moreover, recruitment of TBP, which can activate transcription from a gene promoter, also stimulates DNA replication from an origin site. These results strongly argue that transcriptional activators may not necessarily need to contact DNA replication factors directly, but can stimulate replication by recruiting the RNA polymerase II transcription complex to DNA.

Transcriptional activation by artificial recruitment in yeast is influenced by promoter architecture and downstream sequences

The idea that recruitment of the transcriptional machinery to a promoter suffices for gene activation is based partly on the results of "artificial recruitment" experiments performed in vivo. Artificial recruitment can be effected by a "nonclassical" activator comprising a DNA-binding domain fused to a component of the transcriptional machinery. Here we show that activation by artificial recruitment in yeast can be sensitive to any of three factors: position of the activator-binding elements, sequence of the promoter, and coding sequences downstream of the promoter. In contrast, classical activators worked efficiently at all promoters tested. In all cases the "artificial recruitment" fusions synergized well with classical activators. A classical activator evidently differs from a nonclassical activator in that the former can touch multiple sites on the transcriptional machinery, and we propose that that difference accounts for the broader spectrum of activity of the typical classical activator. A similar conclusion is reached from studies in mammalian cells in the accompanying paper [Nevado, J., Gaudreau, L., Adam, M. & Ptashne, M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 2674-2677].

Transcriptional activation by artificial recruitment in mammalian cells

We show that the typical "nonclassical" activator, which comprises a fusion protein bearing a component of the transcriptional machinery fused to a DNA-binding domain, activates transcription in mammalian cells only weakly when tested with an array of promoters. However, as found in analogous "artificial recruitment" experiments performed in yeast, these activators work synergistically with "classical" activators. The effect of the classical activator in such experiments requires that it be tethered to DNA, a requirement that cannot be overcome by expression of that classical activator at high levels. The effect of the one nonclassical activator that does elicit significant levels of transcription when working alone (i.e., that bearing TATA box-binding protein) is strongly influenced by promoter architecture. The results, consistent with those of analogous experiments in yeast [see the accompanying paper: Gaudreau, L., Keaveney, M., Nevado, J., Zaman, Z., Bryant, G. O., Struhl, K. & Ptashne, M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 2668-2673], suggest that classical activators, presumably by virtue of their abilities to interact with multiple targets, have a functional flexibility that nonclassical activators lack.

Recruitment of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and its implications in gene regulation

In yeast cells, interaction between a DNA-bound protein and a single component of the RNA polymerase II (poIII) holoenzyme is sufficient to recruit the latter to a promoter and thereby activate gene transcription. Here we review results which have suggested such a simple mechanism for how genes can be turned on. The series of experiments which eventually led to this model was originally instigated by studying gene expression in a yeast strain which carries a point mutation in Gal11, a component of the poIII holoenzyme. In cells containing this mutant protein termed Gall11P, a derivative of the transcriptional activator Gal4 devoid of any classical activating region is turned into a strong activator. This activating function acquired by an otherwise silent DNA-binding protein is solely due to a novel and fortuitous interaction between Gal11P and a fragment of the Gal4 dimerization region generated by the P mutation. The simplest explanation for these results is that tethering Gal11 to DNA recruits the poIII holoenzyme and, consequently, activates gene transcription. Transcription factors that are believed not to be integral part of the poIII holoenzyme but are nevertheless required for this instance of gene activation, e.g. the TATA-binding TFIID complex, may bind DNA cooperatively with the holoenzyme when recruited to a promoter, thus forming a complete poIII preinitiation complex. One prediction of this model is that recruitment of the entire poIII transcription complex and consequent gene activation can be achieved by tethering different components to DNA. Indeed, fusion of a DNA-binding domain to a variety of poIII holoenzyme components and TFIID subunits leads to activation of genes bearing the recognition site for the DNA-binding protein. These results imply that accessory factors, which are required to remove or modify nucleosomes do not need to be directly contacted by activators, but can rather be engaged in the activation process when the poIII complex is recruited to DNA. In fact, recruitment of the poIII holoenzyme suffices to remodel nucleosomes at the PHO5 promoter and presumably at many other promoters. Other events in the process of gene expression following recruitment of the transcription complex, e.g. initiation, promoter clearance, elongation and termination, could unravel as a consequence of the recruitment step and the formation of an active preinitiation complex on DNA. This view does not exclude the possibility that classical activators also act directly on chromatin remodeling and post-recruitment steps to regulate gene expression.

Long-distance transcriptional enhancement by the histone acetyltransferase PCAF

Enhancers are defined by their ability to stimulate gene activity from remote sites and their requirement for promoter-proximal upstream activators to activate transcription. Here we demonstrate that recruitment of the p300/CBP-associated factor PCAF to a reporter gene is sufficient to stimulate promoter activity. The PCAF-mediated stimulation of transcription from either a distant or promoter-proximal position depends on the presence of an upstream activator (Sp1). These data suggest that acetyltransferase activity may be a primary component of enhancer function, and that recruitment of polymerase and enhancement of transcription are separable. Transcriptional activation by PCAF requires both its acetyltransferase activity and an additional activity within its N terminus. We also show that the simian virus 40 enhancer and PCAF itself are sufficient to counteract Mad-mediated repression. These results are compatible with recent models in which gene activity is regulated by the competition between deacetylase-mediated repression and enhancer-mediated recruitment of acetyltransferases.

Imposing specificity by localization: mechanism and evolvability

Cells detect extracellular signals by allostery and then give those signals meaning by 'regulated localization'. We suggest that this formulation applies to many biological processes and is particularly well illustrated by the mechanisms of gene regulation. Analysis of these mechanisms reveals that regulated localization requires simple molecular interactions that are readily used combinatorially. This system of regulation is highly 'evolvable', and its use accounts, at least in part, for the nature of the complexities observed in biological systems.

Activator-mediated recruitment of the RNA polymerase II machinery is the predominant mechanism for transcriptional activation in yeast

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators bind to enhancer elements and stimulate the RNA polymerase II (pol II) machinery via functionally autonomous activation domains. In yeast cells, the normal requirement for an activation domain can be bypassed by artificially connecting an enhancer-bound protein to a component of the pol II machinery. This observation suggests, but does not necessarily indicate, that the physiological role of activation domains is to recruit the pol II apparatus to promoters. Here, we show that transcriptional stimulation does not occur when the activation domain is physically disconnected from the enhancer-bound protein and transferred to components of the pol II machinery. The observation that autonomous activation domains are functional when connected to enhancer-bound proteins but not to components of the pol II machinery strongly argues that recruitment is the predominant mechanism for transcriptional activation in yeast.