Interaction with PCNA is essential for yeast DNA polymerase eta function

Structural Basis for the Interaction Between Yeast Chromatin Assembly Factor 1 and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the homotrimeric eukaryotic sliding clamp protein, recruits and coordinates the activities of a multitude of proteins that function on DNA at the replication fork. Chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1), one such protein, is a histone chaperone that deposits histone proteins onto DNA immediately following replication. The interaction between CAF-1 and PCNA is essential for proper nucleosome assembly at silenced genomic regions. Most proteins that bind PCNA contain a PCNA-interacting peptide (PIP) motif, a conserved motif containing only eight amino acids. Precisely how PCNA is able to discriminate between binding partners at the replication fork using only these small motifs remains unclear. Yeast CAF-1 contains a PIP motif on its largest subunit, Cac1. We solved the crystal structure of the PIP motif of CAF-1 bound to PCNA using a new strategy to produce stoichiometric quantities of one PIP motif bound to each monomer of PCNA. The PIP motif of CAF-1 binds to the hydrophobic pocket on the front face of PCNA in a similar manner to most known PIP-PCNA interactions. However, several amino acids immediately flanking either side of the PIP motif bind the IDCL or C-terminus of PCNA, as observed for only a couple other known PIP-PCNA interactions. Furthermore, mutational analysis suggests positively charged amino acids in these flanking regions are responsible for the low micromolar affinity of CAF-1 for PCNA, whereas the presence of a negative charge upstream of the PIP prevents a more robust interaction with PCNA. These results provide additional evidence that positive charges within PIP-flanking regions of PCNA-interacting proteins are crucial for specificity and affinity of their recruitment to PCNA at the replication fork.

Genetic Dissection of Budding Yeast PCNA Mutations Responsible for the Regulated Recruitment of Srs2 Helicase

DNA-damage tolerance (DDT) is a mechanism by which eukaryotes bypass replication-blocking lesions to resume DNA synthesis and maintain cell viability. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DDT is mediated by sequential ubiquitination and sumoylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, encoded by POL30) at the K164 residue. Deletion of RAD5 or RAD18, encoding two ubiquitin ligases required for PCNA ubiquitination, results in severe DNA-damage sensitivity, which can be rescued by inactivation of SRS2 encoding a DNA helicase that inhibits undesired homologous recombination. In this study, we isolated DNA-damage resistant mutants from rad5Δ cells and found that one of them contained a pol30-A171D mutation, which could rescue both rad5Δ and rad18Δ DNA-damage sensitivity in a srs2-dependent and PCNA sumoylation-independent manner. Pol30-A171D abolished physical interaction with Srs2 but not another PCNA-interacting protein Rad30; however, Pol30-A171 is not located in the PCNA-Srs2 interface. The PCNA-Srs2 structure was analyzed to design and create mutations in the complex interface, one of which, pol30-I128A, resulted in phenotypes reminiscent of pol30-A171D. This study allows us to conclude that, unlike other PCNA-binding proteins, Srs2 interacts with PCNA through a partially conserved motif, and the interaction can be strengthened by PCNA sumoylation, which turns Srs2 recruitment into a regulated process. IMPORTANCE It is known that budding yeast PCNA sumoylation serves as a ligand to recruit a DNA helicase Srs2 through its tandem receptor motifs that prevent unwanted homologous recombination (HR) at replication forks, a process known as salvage HR. This study reveals detailed molecular mechanisms, in which constitutive PCNA-PIP interaction has been adapted to a regulatory event. Since both PCNA and Srs2 are highly conserved in eukaryotes, from yeast to human, this study may shed light to investigation of similar regulatory mechanisms.

Transient State Kinetics of Plasmodium falciparum Apicoplast DNA Polymerase Suggests the Involvement of Accessory Factors for Efficient and Accurate DNA Synthesis

Plasmodium, the causative agent of malaria, belongs to the phylum Apicomplexa. Most apicomplexans, including Plasmodium, contain an essential nonphotosynthetic plastid called the apicoplast that harbors its own genome that is replicated by a dedicated organellar replisome. This replisome employs a single DNA polymerase (apPol), which is expected to perform both replicative and translesion synthesis. Unlike other replicative polymerases, no processivity factor for apPol has been identified. While preliminary structural and biochemical studies have provided an overall characterization of apPol, the kinetic mechanism of apPol's activity remains unknown. We have used transient state methods to determine the kinetics of replicative and translesion synthesis by apPol and show that apPol has low processivity and efficiency while copying undamaged DNA. Moreover, while apPol can bypass oxidatively damaged lesions, the bypass is error-prone. Taken together, our results raise the following question─how does a polymerase with low processivity, efficiency, and fidelity (for translesion synthesis) faithfully replicate the apicoplast organellar DNA within the hostile environment of the human host? We hypothesize that interactions with putative components of the apicoplast replisome and/or an as-yet-undiscovered processivity factor transform apPol into an efficient and accurate enzyme.

Post-Translational Modifications of PCNA: Guiding for the Best DNA Damage Tolerance Choice

The sliding clamp PCNA is a multifunctional homotrimer mainly linked to DNA replication. During this process, cells must ensure an accurate and complete genome replication when constantly challenged by the presence of DNA lesions. Post-translational modifications of PCNA play a crucial role in channeling DNA damage tolerance (DDT) and repair mechanisms to bypass unrepaired lesions and promote optimal fork replication restart. PCNA ubiquitination processes trigger the following two main DDT sub-pathways: Rad6/Rad18-dependent PCNA monoubiquitination and Ubc13-Mms2/Rad5-mediated PCNA polyubiquitination, promoting error-prone translation synthesis (TLS) or error-free template switch (TS) pathways, respectively. However, the fork protection mechanism leading to TS during fork reversal is still poorly understood. In contrast, PCNA sumoylation impedes the homologous recombination (HR)-mediated salvage recombination (SR) repair pathway. Focusing on Saccharomyces cerevisiae budding yeast, we summarized PCNA related-DDT and repair mechanisms that coordinately sustain genome stability and cell survival. In addition, we compared PCNA sequences from various fungal pathogens, considering recent advances in structural features. Importantly, the identification of PCNA epitopes may lead to potential fungal targets for antifungal drug development.

The inner side of yeast PCNA contributes to genome stability by mediating interactions with Rad18 and the replicative DNA polymerase δ

PCNA is a central orchestrator of cellular processes linked to DNA metabolism. It is a binding platform for a plethora of proteins and coordinates and regulates the activity of several pathways. The outer side of PCNA comprises most of the known interacting and regulatory surfaces, whereas the residues at the inner side constitute the sliding surface facing the DNA double helix. Here, by investigating the L154A mutation found at the inner side, we show that the inner surface mediates protein interactions essential for genome stability. It forms part of the binding site of Rad18, a key regulator of DNA damage tolerance, and is required for PCNA sumoylation which prevents unscheduled recombination during replication. In addition, the L154 residue is necessary for stable complex formation between PCNA and the replicative DNA polymerase δ. Hence, its absence increases the mutation burden of yeast cells due to faulty replication. In summary, the essential role of the L154 of PCNA in guarding and maintaining stable replication and promoting DNA damage tolerance reveals a new connection between these processes and assigns a new coordinating function to the central channel of PCNA.

Photo-activatable Ub-PCNA probes reveal new structural features of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Polη/PCNA complex

The Y-family DNA polymerase η (Polη) is critical for the synthesis past damaged DNA nucleotides in yeast through translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). TLS is initiated by monoubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the subsequent recruitment of TLS polymerases. Although individual structures of the Polη catalytic core and PCNA have been solved, a high-resolution structure of the complex of Polη/PCNA or Polη/monoubiquitinated PCNA (Ub-PCNA) still remains elusive, partly due to the disordered Polη C-terminal region and the flexibility of ubiquitin on PCNA. To circumvent these obstacles and obtain structural insights into this important TLS polymerase complex, we developed photo-activatable PCNA and Ub-PCNA probes containing a p-benzoyl-L-phenylalanine (pBpa) crosslinker at selected positions on PCNA. By photo-crosslinking the probes with full-length Polη, specific crosslinking sites were identified following tryptic digestion and tandem mass spectrometry analysis. We discovered direct interactions of the Polη catalytic core and its C-terminal region with both sides of the PCNA ring. Model building using the crosslinking site information as a restraint revealed multiple conformations of Polη in the polymerase complex. Availability of the photo-activatable PCNA and Ub-PCNA probes will also facilitate investigations into other PCNA-containing complexes important for DNA replication, repair and damage tolerance.

'PIPs' in DNA polymerase: PCNA interaction affairs

Interaction of PCNA with DNA polymerase is vital to efficient and processive DNA synthesis. PCNA being a homotrimeric ring possesses three hydrophobic pockets mostly involved in an interaction with its binding partners. PCNA interacting proteins contain a short sequence of eight amino acids, popularly coined as PIP motif, which snuggly fits into the hydrophobic pocket of PCNA to stabilize the interaction. In the last two decades, several PIP motifs have been mapped or predicted in eukaryotic DNA polymerases. In this review, we summarize our understandings of DNA polymerase-PCNA interaction, the function of such interaction during DNA synthesis, and emphasize the lacunae that persist. Because of the presence of multiple ligands in the replisome complex and due to many interaction sites in DNA polymerases, we also propose two modes of DNA polymerase positioning on PCNA required for DNA synthesis to rationalize the tool-belt model of DNA replication.

Coordinated Cut and Bypass: Replication of Interstrand Crosslink-Containing DNA

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are covalently bound DNA lesions, which are commonly induced by chemotherapeutic drugs, such as cisplatin and mitomycin C or endogenous byproducts of metabolic processes. This type of DNA lesion can block ongoing RNA transcription and DNA replication and thus cause genome instability and cancer. Several cellular defense mechanism, such as the Fanconi anemia pathway have developed to ensure accurate repair and DNA replication when ICLs are present. Various structure-specific nucleases and translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases have come into focus in relation to ICL bypass. Current models propose that a structure-specific nuclease incision is needed to unhook the ICL from the replication fork, followed by the activity of a low-fidelity TLS polymerase enabling replication through the unhooked ICL adduct. This review focuses on how, in parallel with the Fanconi anemia pathway, PCNA interactions and ICL-induced PCNA ubiquitylation regulate the recruitment, substrate specificity, activity, and coordinated action of certain nucleases and TLS polymerases in the execution of stalled replication fork rescue via ICL bypass.

Evaluation and modulation of DNA lesion bypass in an SV40 large T antigen-based in vitro replication system

DNA damage removal by nucleotide excision repair (NER) and replicative bypass via translesion synthesis (TLS) and template switch (TSw) are important in ensuring genome stability. In this study, we tested the applicability of an SV40 large T antigen‐based replication system for the simultaneous examination of these damage tolerance processes. Using both Sanger and next‐generation sequencing combined with lesion‐specific qPCR and replication efficiency studies, we demonstrate that this system works well for studying NER and TLS, especially its one‐polymerase branch, while it is less suited to investigations of homology‐related repair processes, such as TSw. Cis‐syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photoproducts were replicated with equal efficiency to lesion‐free plasmids in vitro, and the majority of TLS on this lesion could be inhibited by a peptide (PIR) specific for the polη‐PCNA interaction interface. TLS on 6–4 pyrimidine–pyrimidone photoproduct proved to be inefficient and was slightly facilitated by PIR as well as by a recombinant ubiquitin‐binding zinc finger domain of polη in HeLa extract, possibly by promoting polymerase exchange. Supplementation of the extract with recombinant PCNA variants indicated the dependence of TLS on PCNA ubiquitylation. In contrast to active TLS and NER, we found no evidence of successful TSw in cellular extracts. The established methods can promote in vitro investigations of replicative DNA damage bypass.

Yeast DNA polymerase η possesses two PIP-like motifs that bind PCNA and Rad6-Rad18 with different specificities

In translesion synthesis (TLS), specialized DNA polymerases, such as polymerase (pol) η and Rev1, are recruited to stalled replication forks. These polymerases form a multi-protein complex with PCNA, Rad6-Rad18, and other specialized polymerases. Pol η interacts with PCNA and Rev1 via a PCNA-interacting protein (PIP) motif in its C-terminal unstructured region. Here we report the discovery of a second PIP-like motif in the C-terminal region of pol η, which we have designated as PIP2. We have designated the original PIP motif as PIP1. We show that the pol η PIP1 and PIP2 motifs bind PCNA with different affinities and kinetics. PIP1 binds with higher affinity than does PIP2, and PIP1 dissociates more slowly than does PIP2. In addition, we show that the interaction between pol η and Rad6-Rad18 is also mediated by the pol η PIP1 and PIP2 motifs. Again, we show that the affinity and kinetics by which these motifs bind Rad6-Rad18 is different. These findings are significant, because the multiple PIP-like motifs on pol η likely play quite different roles within the multi-protein complex formed at stalled replication forks. PIP1 likely plays a critical role in the recruiting pol η to this multi-protein complex. PIP2, by contrast, likely plays a critical role in maintaining the architecture and the dynamics of this multi-protein complex needed to maximize the efficiency and accuracy of TLS.

The roles of polymerases ν and θ in replicative bypass of O6- and N2-alkyl-2'-deoxyguanosine lesions in human cells

Exogenous and endogenous chemicals can react with DNA to produce DNA lesions that may block DNA replication. Not much is known about the roles of polymerase (Pol) ν and Pol θ in translesion synthesis (TLS) in cells. Here we examined the functions of these two polymerases in bypassing major-groove O6-alkyl-2'-deoxyguanosine (O6-alkyl-dG) and minor-groove N2-alkyl-dG lesions in human cells, where the alkyl groups are ethyl, n-butyl (nBu), and, for O6-alkyl-dG, pyridyloxobutyl. We found that Pol ν and Pol θ promote TLS across major-groove O6-alkyl-dG lesions. O6-alkyl-dG lesions mainly induced G→A mutations that were modulated by the two TLS polymerases and the structures of the alkyl groups. Simultaneous ablation of Pol ν and Pol θ resulted in diminished mutation frequencies for all three O6-alkyl-dG lesions. Depletion of Pol ν alone reduced mutations only for O6-nBu-dG, and sole loss of Pol θ attenuated the mutation rates for O6-nBu-dG and O6-pyridyloxobutyl-dG. Replication across the two N2-alkyl-dG lesions was error-free, and Pol ν and Pol θ were dispensable for their replicative bypass. Together, our results provide critical knowledge about the involvement of Pol ν and Pol θ in bypassing alkylated guanine lesions in human cells.

Pif1 is essential for efficient replisome progression through lagging strand G-quadruplex DNA secondary structures

Pif1 DNA helicase is a potent unwinder of G-quadruplex (G4) structures in vitro and functions to maintain genome stability at G4 sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we developed and utilized a live-cell imaging approach to quantitatively measure the progression rates of single replication forks through different G4 containing sequences in individual yeast cells. We show that in the absence of Pif1, replication rates through specific lagging strand G4 sequences in vivo is significantly decreased. In contrast, we found that in the absence of Pif1, replication rates through the same G4s on the leading strand are not decreased relative to the respective WT strains, showing that Pif1 is essential only for efficient replication through lagging strand G4s. Additionally, we show that a canonical PIP sequence in Pif1 interacts with PCNA and that replication through G4 structures is significantly slower in the absence of this interaction in vitro and in vivo. Thus, Pif1–PCNA interaction is essential for optimal replisome progression through G4 sequences, highlighting the importance of coupling between Pif1 activity and replisome progression during yeast genome replication.

Modeling Conformationally Flexible Proteins With X-ray Scattering and Molecular Simulations

Proteins and protein complexes with high conformational flexibility participate in a wide range of biological processes. These processes include genome maintenance, gene expression, signal transduction, cell cycle regulation, and many others. Gaining a structural understanding of conformationally flexible proteins and protein complexes is arguably the greatest problem facing structural biologists today. Over the last decade, some progress has been made toward understanding the conformational flexibility of such systems using hybrid approaches. One particularly fruitful strategy has been the combination of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and molecular simulations. In this article, we provide a brief overview of SAXS and molecular simulations and then discuss two general approaches for combining SAXS data and molecular simulations: minimal ensemble approaches and full ensemble approaches. In minimal ensemble approaches, one selects a minimal ensemble of structures from the simulations that best fit the SAXS data. In full ensemble approaches, one validates a full ensemble of structures from the simulations using SAXS data. We argue that full ensemble models are more realistic than minimal ensemble searches models and that full ensemble approaches should be used wherever possible.

DNA polymerase η contributes to genome-wide lagging strand synthesis

DNA polymerase η (pol η) is best known for its ability to bypass UV-induced thymine-thymine (T-T) dimers and other bulky DNA lesions, but pol η also has other cellular roles. Here, we present evidence that pol η competes with DNA polymerases α and δ for the synthesis of the lagging strand genome-wide, where it also shows a preference for T-T in the DNA template. Moreover, we found that the C-terminus of pol η, which contains a PCNA-Interacting Protein motif is required for pol η to function in lagging strand synthesis. Finally, we provide evidence that a pol η dependent signature is also found to be lagging strand specific in patients with skin cancer. Taken together, these findings provide insight into the physiological role of DNA synthesis by pol η and have implications for our understanding of how our genome is replicated to avoid mutagenesis, genome instability and cancer.

Archaeal DNA replication and repair: new genetic, biophysical and molecular tools for discovering and characterizing enzymes, pathways and mechanisms

DNA replication and repair are essential biological processes needed for the survival of all organisms. Although these processes are fundamentally conserved in the three domains, archaea, bacteria and eukarya, the proteins and complexes involved differ. The genetic and biophysical tools developed for archaea in the last several years have accelerated the study of DNA replication and repair in this domain. In this review, the current knowledge of DNA replication and repair processes in archaea will be summarized, with emphasis on the contribution of genetics and other recently developed biophysical and molecular tools, including capillary gel electrophoresis, next-generation sequencing and single-molecule approaches. How these new tools will continue to drive archaeal DNA replication and repair research will also be discussed.

Conformational Flexibility of Ubiquitin-Modified and SUMO-Modified PCNA Shown by Full-Ensemble Hybrid Methods

Ubiquitin-modified proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-modified PCNA regulate DNA damage tolerance pathways. X-ray crystal structures of these proteins suggested that they do not have much conformational flexibility because the modifiers have preferred binding sites on the surface of PCNA. By contrast, small-angle X-ray scattering analyses of these proteins suggested that they have different degrees of conformational flexibility, with SUMO-modified PCNA being more flexible. These conclusions were based on minimal-ensemble hybrid approaches, which produce unrealistic models by representing flexible proteins with only a few static structures. To overcome the limitations of minimal-ensemble hybrid approaches and to determine the degree of conformational flexibility of ubiquitin-modified PCNA and SUMO-modified PCNA, we utilized a novel full-ensemble hybrid approach. We carried out molecular simulations and small-angle X-ray scattering analyses of both proteins and obtained outstanding agreement between the full ensembles generated by the simulations and the experimental data. We found that both proteins have a high degree of conformational flexibility. The modifiers occupy many positions around the back and side of the PCNA ring. Moreover, we found no preferred ubiquitin-binding or SUMO-binding sites on PCNA. This conformational flexibility likely facilitates the recognition of downstream effector proteins and the formation of PCNA tool belts.

The C-terminal region of translesion synthesis DNA polymerase η is partially unstructured and has high conformational flexibility

Eukaryotic DNA polymerase η catalyzes translesion synthesis of thymine dimers and 8-oxoguanines. It is comprised of a polymerase domain and a C-terminal region, both of which are required for its biological function. The C-terminal region mediates interactions with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and other translesion synthesis proteins such as Rev1. This region contains a ubiquitin-binding/zinc-binding (UBZ) motif and a PCNA-interacting protein (PIP) motif. Currently little structural information is available for this region of polymerase η. Using a combination of approaches-including genetic complementation assays, X-ray crystallography, Langevin dynamics simulations, and small-angle X-ray scattering-we show that the C-terminal region is partially unstructured and has high conformational flexibility. This implies that the C-terminal region acts as a flexible tether linking the polymerase domain to PCNA thereby increasing its local concentration. Such tethering would facilitate the sampling of translesion synthesis polymerases to ensure that the most appropriate one is selected to bypass the lesion.

The translesion DNA polymerases Pol ζ and Rev1 are activated independently of PCNA ubiquitination upon UV radiation in mutants of DNA polymerase δ

Replicative DNA polymerases cannot insert efficiently nucleotides at sites of base lesions. This function is taken over by specialized translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) polymerases to allow DNA replication completion in the presence of DNA damage. In eukaryotes, Rad6- and Rad18-mediated PCNA ubiquitination at lysine 164 promotes recruitment of TLS polymerases, allowing cells to efficiently cope with DNA damage. However, several studies showed that TLS polymerases can be recruited also in the absence of PCNA ubiquitination. We hypothesized that the stability of the interactions between DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) subunits and/or between Pol δ and PCNA at the primer/template junction is a crucial factor to determine the requirement of PCNA ubiquitination. To test this hypothesis, we used a structural mutant of Pol δ in which the interaction between Pol3 and Pol31 is inhibited. We found that in yeast, rad18Δ-associated UV hypersensitivity is suppressed by pol3-ct, a mutant allele of the POL3 gene that encodes the catalytic subunit of replicative Pol δ. pol3-ct suppressor effect was specifically dependent on the Rev1 and Pol ζ TLS polymerases. This result strongly suggests that TLS polymerases could rely much less on PCNA ubiquitination when Pol δ interaction with PCNA is partially compromised by mutations. In agreement with this model, we found that the pol3-FI allele suppressed rad18Δ-associated UV sensitivity as observed for pol3-ct. This POL3 allele carries mutations within a putative PCNA Interacting Peptide (PIP) motif. We then provided molecular and genetic evidence that this motif could contribute to Pol δ-PCNA interaction indirectly, although it is not a bona fide PIP. Overall, our results suggest that the primary role of PCNA ubiquitination is to allow TLS polymerases to outcompete Pol δ for PCNA access upon DNA damage.

Replicative DNA polymerases have the essential role of replicating genomic DNA during the S phase of each cell cycle. DNA replication occurs smoothly and accurately if the DNA to be replicated is undamaged. Conversely, replicative DNA polymerases stall abruptly when they encounter a damaged base on their template. In this case, alternative specialized DNA polymerases are recruited to insert nucleotides at sites of base lesions. However, these translesion polymerases are not processive and they are poorly accurate. Therefore, they need to be tightly regulated. This is achieved by the covalent binding of the small ubiquitin peptide to the polymerase cofactor PCNA that subsequently triggers the recruitment of translesion polymerases at sites of DNA damage. Yet, recruitment of translesion polymerases independently of PCNA ubiquitination also has been documented, although the underlying mechanism is not known. Moreover, this observation makes more difficult to understand the exact role of PCNA ubiquitination. Here, we present strong genetic evidence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae implying that the replicative DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) prevents the recruitment of the translesion polymerases Pol ζ and Rev1 following UV irradiation unless PCNA is ubiquitinated. Thus, the primary role of PCNA ubiquitination would be to allow translesion polymerases to outcompete Pol δ upon DNA damage. In addition, our results led us to propose that translesion polymerases could be recruited independently of PCNA ubiquitination when Pol δ association with PCNA is challenged, for instance at difficult-to-replicate loci.

Translesion synthesis DNA polymerase η exhibits a specific RNA extension activity and a transcription-associated function

Polymerase eta (Polη) is a low fidelity translesion synthesis DNA polymerase that rescues damage-stalled replication by inserting deoxy-ribonucleotides opposite DNA damage sites resulting in error-free or mutagenic damage bypass. In this study we identify a new specific RNA extension activity of Polη of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that Polη is able to extend RNA primers in the presence of ribonucleotides (rNTPs), and that these reactions are an order of magnitude more efficient than the misinsertion of rNTPs into DNA. Moreover, during RNA extension Polη performs error-free bypass of the 8-oxoguanine and thymine dimer DNA lesions, though with a 10³ and 10²-fold lower efficiency, respectively, than it synthesizes opposite undamaged nucleotides. Furthermore, in vivo experiments demonstrate that the transcription of several genes is affected by the lack of Polη, and that Polη is enriched over actively transcribed regions. Moreover, inactivation of its polymerase activity causes similar transcription inhibition as the absence of Polη. In summary, these results suggest that the new RNA synthetic activity of Polη can have in vivo relevance.

Analyzing the Catalytic Activities and Interactions of Eukaryotic Translesion Synthesis Polymerases

Translesion synthesis is the process by which nonclassical DNA polymerases bypass DNA damage during DNA replication. Cells possess a variety of nonclassical polymerases, each one is specific for incorporating nucleotides opposite to one or more closely related DNA lesions, called its cognate lesions. In this chapter, we discuss a variety of approaches for probing the catalytic activities and the protein-protein interactions of nonclassical polymerases. With respect to their catalytic activities, we discuss polymerase assays, steady-state kinetics, and presteady-state kinetics. With respect to their interactions, we discuss qualitative binding assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and coimmunoprecipitation; quantitative binding assays such as isothermal titration calorimetry, surface plasmon resonance, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy; and single-molecule binding assays such as total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. We focus on how nonclassical polymerases accommodate their cognate lesions during nucleotide incorporation and how the most appropriate nonclassical polymerase is selected for bypassing a given lesion.

Translesion Synthesis: Insights into the Selection and Switching of DNA Polymerases

DNA replication is constantly challenged by DNA lesions, noncanonical DNA structures and difficult-to-replicate DNA sequences. Two major strategies to rescue a stalled replication fork and to ensure continuous DNA synthesis are: (1) template switching and recombination-dependent DNA synthesis; and (2) translesion synthesis (TLS) using specialized DNA polymerases to perform nucleotide incorporation opposite DNA lesions. The former pathway is mainly error-free, and the latter is error-prone and a major source of mutagenesis. An accepted model of translesion synthesis involves DNA polymerase switching steps between a replicative DNA polymerase and one or more TLS DNA polymerases. The mechanisms that govern the selection and exchange of specialized DNA polymerases for a given DNA lesion are not well understood. In this review, recent studies concerning the mechanisms of selection and switching of DNA polymerases in eukaryotic systems are summarized.

Rev1 is a base excision repair enzyme with 5'-deoxyribose phosphate lyase activity

Rev1 is a member of the Y-family of DNA polymerases and is known for its deoxycytidyl transferase activity that incorporates dCMP into DNA and its ability to function as a scaffold factor for other Y-family polymerases in translesion bypass events. Rev1 also is involved in mutagenic processes during somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes. In light of the mutation pattern consistent with dCMP insertion observed earlier in mouse fibroblast cells treated with a base excision repair-inducing agent, we questioned whether Rev1 could also be involved in base excision repair (BER). Here, we uncovered a weak 5′-deoxyribose phosphate (5′-dRP) lyase activity in mouse Rev1 and demonstrated the enzyme can mediate BER in vitro. The full-length Rev1 protein and its catalytic core domain are similar in their ability to support BER in vitro. The dRP lyase activity in both of these proteins was confirmed by NaBH₄ reduction of the Schiff base intermediate and kinetics studies. Limited proteolysis, mass spectrometry and deletion analysis localized the dRP lyase active site to the C-terminal segment of Rev1's catalytic core domain. These results suggest that Rev1 could serve as a backup polymerase in BER and could potentially contribute to AID-initiated antibody diversification through this activity.

R.I.P. to the PIP: PCNA-binding motif no longer considered specific: PIP motifs and other related sequences are not distinct entities and can bind multiple proteins involved in genome maintenance

Many proteins responsible for genome maintenance interact with one another via short sequence motifs. The best known of these are PIP motifs, which mediate interactions with the replication protein PCNA. Others include RIR motifs, which bind the translesion synthesis protein Rev1, and MIP motifs, which bind the mismatch repair protein Mlh1. Although these motifs have similar consensus sequences, they have traditionally been viewed as separate motifs, each with their own target protein. In this article, we review several recent studies that challenge this view. Taken together, they imply that these different motifs are not distinct entities. Instead, there is a single, broader class of motifs, which we call "PIP-like" motifs, which have overlapping specificities and are capable of binding multiple target proteins. Given this, we must reassess the role of these motifs in forming the network of interacting proteins responsible for genome maintenance.

Mutations at the Subunit Interface of Yeast Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Reveal a Versatile Regulatory Domain

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) plays a key role in many cellular processes and due to that it interacts with a plethora of proteins. The main interacting surfaces of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PCNA have been mapped to the interdomain connecting loop and to the carboxy-terminal domain. Here we report that the subunit interface of yeast PCNA also has regulatory roles in the function of several DNA damage response pathways. Using site-directed mutagenesis we engineered mutations at both sides of the interface and investigated the effect of these alleles on DNA damage response. Genetic experiments with strains bearing the mutant alleles revealed that mutagenic translesion synthesis, nucleotide excision repair, and homologous recombination are all regulated through residues at the subunit interface. Moreover, genetic characterization of one of our mutants identifies a new sub-branch of nucleotide excision repair. Based on these results we conclude that residues at the subunit boundary of PCNA are not only important for the formation of the trimer structure of PCNA, but they constitute a regulatory protein domain that mediates different DNA damage response pathways, as well.

PCNA SUMOylation protects against PCNA polyubiquitination-mediated, Rad59-dependent, spontaneous, intrachromosomal gene conversion

Homologous recombination is crucial in both the maintenance of genome stability and the generation of genetic diversity. Recently, multiple aspects of the recombination machinery functioning at arrested DNA replication forks have been established, yet the roles of diverse modifications of PCNA, the key platform organizing the replication complex, in intrachromosomal recombination have not been comprehensively elucidated. Here, we report how PCNA SUMOylation and/or polyubiquitination affects recombination between direct repeats in S. cerevisiae. Our results show that these PCNA modifications primarily affect gene conversion, whereas their effect on the recombination-mediated deletion of intervening sequence is much less obvious. Siz1-dependent PCNA SUMOylation strongly limits Rad52/Rad51/Rad59-dependent gene conversion. A 5- to 10-fold increase in the frequency of such recombination events is observed in Siz1-defective strains, but this increase is fully suppressed when PCNA polyubiquitination is also compromised. PCNA polyubiquitination can stimulate gene conversion in both PCNA SUMOylation-proficient and SUMOylation-deficient strains. On the other hand, in PCNA polyubiquitination-deficient strains, the lack of PCNA SUMOylation does not affect GC levels. Therefore, we postulate that the antirecombinogenic activity of Siz1 mainly concerns recombination induced by PCNA polyubiquitination. In the absence of PCNA SUMOylation, the frequency of PCNA polyubiquitination-mediated gene conversion is not only increased, but it is also channeled into the Rad59-dependent pathway. Additionally, we show a weak inhibitory effect of Rad5 on Rad52/Rad59-directed single-strand annealing.

PCNA tool belts and polymerase bridges form during translesion synthesis

Large multi-protein complexes play important roles in many biological processes, including DNA replication and repair, transcription, and signal transduction. One of the challenges in studying such complexes is to understand their mechanisms of assembly and disassembly and their architectures. Using single-molecule total internal reflection (TIRF) microscopy, we have examined the assembly and disassembly of the multi-protein complex that carries out translesion synthesis, the error-prone replication of damaged DNA. We show that the ternary complexes containing proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and two non-classical DNA polymerases, Rev1 and DNA polymerase η, have two architectures: PCNA tool belts and Rev1 bridges. Moreover, these complexes are dynamic and their architectures can interconvert without dissociation. The formation of PCNA tool belts and Rev1 bridges and the ability of these complexes to change architectures are likely means of facilitating selection of the appropriate non-classical polymerase and polymerase-switching events.

The Many Roles of PCNA in Eukaryotic DNA Replication

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) plays critical roles in many aspects of DNA replication and replication-associated processes, including translesion synthesis, error-free damage bypass, break-induced replication, mismatch repair, and chromatin assembly. Since its discovery, our view of PCNA has evolved from a replication accessory factor to the hub protein in a large protein-protein interaction network that organizes and orchestrates many of the key events at the replication fork. We begin this review article with an overview of the structure and function of PCNA. We discuss the ways its many interacting partners bind and how these interactions are regulated by posttranslational modifications such as ubiquitylation and sumoylation. We then explore the many roles of PCNA in normal DNA replication and in replication-coupled DNA damage tolerance and repair processes. We conclude by considering how PCNA can interact physically with so many binding partners to carry out its numerous roles. We propose that there is a large, dynamic network of linked PCNA molecules at and around the replication fork. This network would serve to increase the local concentration of all the proteins necessary for DNA replication and replication-associated processes and to regulate their various activities.

The Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA)-interacting Protein (PIP) Motif of DNA Polymerase η Mediates Its Interaction with the C-terminal Domain of Rev1

Y-family DNA polymerases, such as polymerase η, polymerase ι, and polymerase κ, catalyze the bypass of DNA damage during translesion synthesis. These enzymes are recruited to sites of DNA damage by interacting with the essential replication accessory protein proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the scaffold protein Rev1. In most Y-family polymerases, these interactions are mediated by one or more conserved PCNA-interacting protein (PIP) motifs that bind in a hydrophobic pocket on the front side of PCNA as well as by conserved Rev1-interacting region (RIR) motifs that bind in a hydrophobic pocket on the C-terminal domain of Rev1. Yeast polymerase η, a prototypical translesion synthesis polymerase, binds both PCNA and Rev1. It possesses a single PIP motif but not an RIR motif. Here we show that the PIP motif of yeast polymerase η mediates its interactions both with PCNA and with Rev1. Moreover, the PIP motif of polymerase η binds in the hydrophobic pocket on the Rev1 C-terminal domain. We also show that the RIR motif of human polymerase κ and the PIP motif of yeast Msh6 bind both PCNA and Rev1. Overall, these findings demonstrate that PIP motifs and RIR motifs have overlapping specificities and can interact with both PCNA and Rev1 in structurally similar ways. These findings also suggest that PIP motifs are a more versatile protein interaction motif than previously believed.

Characterization of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) from pathogenic yeast Candida albicans and its functional analyses in S. cerevisiae

Background

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA/POL30) an essential protein forms a homotrimeric ring encircling dsDNA and serves as a molecular scaffold to recruit various factors during DNA replication, repair and recombination. According to Candida Genome Database (CGD), orf19.4616 sequence is predicted to encode C. albicans PCNA (CaPCNA) that has not been characterized yet.

Results

Molecular modeling studies of orf19.4616 using S. cerevisiae PCNA sequence (ScPCNA) as a template, and its subsequent biochemical characterizations suggest that like other eukaryotic PCNAs, orf19.4616 encodes for a conventional homotrimeric sliding clamp. Further we showed by surface plasmon resonance that CaPCNA physically interacted with yeast DNA polymerase eta. Plasmid segregation in genomic knock out yeast strains showed that CaPCNA but not its G178S mutant complemented for cell survival. Unexpectedly, heterologous expression of CaPCNA in S. cerevisiae exhibited slow growth phenotypes, sensitivity to cold and elevated temperatures; and showed enhanced sensitivity to hydroxyurea and various DNA damaging agents in comparison to strain bearing ScPCNA. Interestingly, wild type strains of C. albicans showed remarkable tolerance to DNA damaging agents when compared with similarly treated yeast cells.

Conclusions

Despite structural and physiochemical similarities; we have demonstrated that there are distinct functional differences between ScPCNA and CaPCNA, and probably the ways both the strains maintain their genomic stability. We propose that the growth of pathogenic C. albicans which is evolved to tolerate DNA damages could be controlled effectively by targeting this unique fungal PCNA.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0582-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A fluorescent bimolecular complementation screen reveals MAF1, RNF7 and SETD3 as PCNA-associated proteins in human cells

The proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a conserved component of DNA replication factories, and interactions with PCNA mediate the recruitment of many essential DNA replication enzymes to these sites of DNA synthesis. A complete description of the structure and composition of these factories remains elusive, and a better knowledge of them will improve our understanding of how the maintenance of genome and epigenetic stability is achieved. To fully characterize the set of proteins that interact with PCNA we developed a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) screen for PCNA-interactors in human cells. This 2-hybrid type screen for interactors from a human cDNA library is rapid and efficient. The fluorescent read-out for protein interaction enables facile selection of interacting clones, and we combined this with next generation sequencing to identify the cDNAs encoding the interacting proteins. This method was able to reproducibly identify previously characterized PCNA-interactors but importantly also identified RNF7, Maf1 and SetD3 as PCNA-interacting proteins. We validated these interactions by co-immunoprecipitation from human cell extracts and by interaction analyses using recombinant proteins. These results show that the BiFC screen is a valuable method for the identification of protein-protein interactions in living mammalian cells. This approach has potentially wide application as it is high throughput and readily automated. We suggest that, given this interaction with PCNA, Maf1, RNF7, and SetD3 are potentially involved in DNA replication, DNA repair, or associated processes.

The Werner syndrome protein limits the error-prone 8-oxo-dG lesion bypass activity of human DNA polymerase kappa

Human DNA polymerase kappa (hpol κ) is the only Y-family member to preferentially insert dAMP opposite 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) during translesion DNA synthesis. We have studied the mechanism of action by which hpol κ activity is modulated by the Werner syndrome protein (WRN), a RecQ helicase known to influence repair of 8-oxo-dG. Here we show that WRN stimulates the 8-oxo-dG bypass activity of hpol κ in vitro by enhancing the correct base insertion opposite the lesion, as well as extension from dC:8-oxo-dG base pairs. Steady-state kinetic analysis reveals that WRN improves hpol κ-catalyzed dCMP insertion opposite 8-oxo-dG ∼10-fold and extension from dC:8-oxo-dG by 2.4-fold. Stimulation is primarily due to an increase in the rate constant for polymerization (k_pol), as assessed by pre-steady-state kinetics, and it requires the RecQ C-terminal (RQC) domain. In support of the functional data, recombinant WRN and hpol κ were found to physically interact through the exo and RQC domains of WRN, and co-localization of WRN and hpol κ was observed in human cells treated with hydrogen peroxide. Thus, WRN limits the error-prone bypass of 8-oxo-dG by hpol κ, which could influence the sensitivity to oxidative damage that has previously been observed for Werner's syndrome cells.

Identification of two functional PCNA-binding domains in human DNA polymerase κ

Previously, we have shown that human DNA polymerase (Pol) η has two functional PCNA-binding motifs, PIP1 and PIP2, and that a C-terminal deletion of Polη that lacks the ubiquitin-binding UBZ domain and the PIP2 domain but retains the PIP1 domain promotes normal levels of translesion synthesis (TLS) opposite a cis-syn TT dimer in human cells. Here, we identify two PIP domains in Polκ and show that TLS occurs normally in human fibroblast cells in which the pip1 or pip2 mutant Polκ is expressed, but mutational inactivation of both PIP domains renders Polκ nonfunctional in TLS opposite the thymine glycol lesion. Thus, the two PIP domains of Polκ function redundantly in TLS opposite this DNA lesion in human cells. However, and surprisingly, whereas mutational inactivation of the PIP1 domain completely inhibits the stimulation of DNA synthesis by Polκ in the presence of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), replication factor C, and replication protein A, mutations in PIP2 have no adverse effect on PCNA-dependent DNA synthesis. This raises the possibility that activation of Polκ PIP2 as a PCNA-binding domain occurs during TLS in human cells and that protein-protein interactions and post-transcriptional modifications are involved in such activation.

Post-translational modifications of proliferating cell nuclear antigen: A key signal integrator for DNA damage response (Review)

Previous studies have shown that the post-translational modifications of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) may be crucial in influencing the cellular choice between different pathways, such as the cell cycle checkpoint, DNA repair or apoptosis pathways, in order to maintain genomic stability. DNA damage leads to replication stress and the subsequent induction of PCNA modification by small ubiquitin (Ub)-related modifiers and Ub, which has been identified to affect multiple biological processes of genomic DNA. Thus far, much has been learned concerning the behavior of modified PCNA as a key signal integrator in response to DNA damage. In humans and yeast, modified PCNA activates DNA damage bypass via an error-prone or error-free pathway to prevent the breakage of DNA replication forks, which may potentially induce double-strand breaks and subsequent chromosomal rearrangements. However, the exact mechanisms by which these pathways work and by what means the modified PCNA is involved in these processes remain elusive. Thus, the improved understanding of PCNA modification and its implications for DNA damage response may provide us with more insight into the mechanisms by which human cells regulate aberrant recombination events, and cancer initiation and development. The present review focuses on the post-translational modifications of PCNA and its important functions in mediating mammalian cellular response to different types of DNA damage.

Def1 promotes the degradation of Pol3 for polymerase exchange to occur during DNA-damage--induced mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA damages hinder the advance of replication forks because of the inability of the replicative polymerases to synthesize across most DNA lesions. Because stalled replication forks are prone to undergo DNA breakage and recombination that can lead to chromosomal rearrangements and cell death, cells possess different mechanisms to ensure the continuity of replication on damaged templates. Specialized, translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases can take over synthesis at DNA damage sites. TLS polymerases synthesize DNA with a high error rate and are responsible for damage-induced mutagenesis, so their activity must be strictly regulated. However, the mechanism that allows their replacement of the replicative polymerase is unknown. Here, using protein complex purification and yeast genetic tools, we identify Def1 as a key factor for damage-induced mutagenesis in yeast. In in vivo experiments we demonstrate that upon DNA damage, Def1 promotes the ubiquitylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation of Pol3, the catalytic subunit of the replicative polymerase δ, whereas Pol31 and Pol32, the other two subunits of polymerase δ, are not affected. We also show that purified Pol31 and Pol32 can form a complex with the TLS polymerase Rev1. Our results imply that TLS polymerases carry out DNA lesion bypass only after the Def1-assisted removal of Pol3 from the stalled replication fork.

DNA repair mechanisms and the bypass of DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA repair mechanisms are critical for maintaining the integrity of genomic DNA, and their loss is associated with cancer predisposition syndromes. Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have played a central role in elucidating the highly conserved mechanisms that promote eukaryotic genome stability. This review will focus on repair mechanisms that involve excision of a single strand from duplex DNA with the intact, complementary strand serving as a template to fill the resulting gap. These mechanisms are of two general types: those that remove damage from DNA and those that repair errors made during DNA synthesis. The major DNA-damage repair pathways are base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair, which, in the most simple terms, are distinguished by the extent of single-strand DNA removed together with the lesion. Mistakes made by DNA polymerases are corrected by the mismatch repair pathway, which also corrects mismatches generated when single strands of non-identical duplexes are exchanged during homologous recombination. In addition to the true repair pathways, the postreplication repair pathway allows lesions or structural aberrations that block replicative DNA polymerases to be tolerated. There are two bypass mechanisms: an error-free mechanism that involves a switch to an undamaged template for synthesis past the lesion and an error-prone mechanism that utilizes specialized translesion synthesis DNA polymerases to directly synthesize DNA across the lesion. A high level of functional redundancy exists among the pathways that deal with lesions, which minimizes the detrimental effects of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage.

Effects of polymorphisms in translesion DNA synthesis genes on lung cancer risk and prognosis in Chinese men

PURPOSE

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) plays an important role in promoting replication through DNA lesions. Genetic polymorphisms in TLS genes may have potential roles in lung cancer development in humans.

METHODS

We evaluated the association between genetic variants in six TLS genes and the risk and survival of lung cancer in a case-control study in China. Included in the study are 224 lung cancer patients and 448 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Carriers of the G allele of POLκ rs5744724 had significantly reduced risk of lung cancer (odds ratio (OR)=0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.89), comparing with those carrying the C allele, and the AA genotype of PCNA rs25406 was also associated with significantly decreased cancer risk compared with the major homozygote alleles (OR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.86). Haplotype analysis showed that subjects with the POLκ C-G (rs5744533-rs5744724) haplotype had decreased risk of lung cancer (OR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98), comparing with those carrying the C-C haplotype. Besides, the heterozygote of REV1 rs3087386 and rs3792136 were independent prognostic factors for lung cancer survival with hazard radio (HR) 1.54 (95% CI: 1.12-2.12) and 1.44 (95% CI: 1.06-1.97) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that genetic variants in POLκ and PCNA genes may play roles in the susceptibility of lung cancer, and REV1 gene may have roles in lung cancer survival in Chinese men.

DNA-damage tolerance mediated by PCNA*Ub fusions in human cells is dependent on Rev1 but not Polη

In response to replication-blocking lesions, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) can be sequentially ubiquitinated at the K164 residue, leading to two modes of DNA-damage tolerance, namely, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and error-free lesion bypass. Although the majority of reported data support a model whereby monoubiquitinated PCNA enhances its affinity for TLS polymerases and hence recruits them to the damage sites, this model has also been challenged by several observations. In this study, we expressed the PCNA-164R and ubiquitin (UB) fusion genes in an inducible manner in an attempt to mimic PCNA monoubiquitination in cultured human cells. It was found that expression of both N- and C-terminal PCNA•Ub fusions conferred significant tolerance to ultraviolet (UV)-induced DNA damage. Surprisingly, depletion of Polη, a TLS polymerase dedicated to bypassing UV-induced pyrimidine dimers, did not alter tolerance conferred by PCNA•Ub. In contrast, depletion of Rev1, another TLS polymerase serving as a scaffold for the assembly of the TLS complex, completely abolished PCNA•Ub-mediated damage tolerance. Similar genetic interactions were confirmed when UV-induced monoubiquitination of endogenous PCNA is abolished by RAD18 deletion. Hence, PCNA•Ub fusions bypass the requirement for PCNA monoubiquitination, and UV damage tolerance conferred by these fusions is dependent on Rev1 but independent of Polη.

Regulatory role of ubiquitin in eukaryotic DNA translesion synthesis

Although often associated with proteasome-mediated protein degradation, ubiquitin plays essential nondegradative roles in a myriad of cellular processes, including chromatin dynamics, membrane trafficking, innate immunity, and DNA damage response. The recent progress in understanding DNA translesion synthesis (TLS), an important branch of DNA damage response, has largely been stimulated by the finding that ubiquitination of an essential nuclear protein, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), controls precisely how eukaryotic cells respond to DNA damage. Despite the remarkable activity of the TLS polymerases in synthesizing past the damaged nucleotides, they are intrinsically error-prone on the normal DNA template. Therefore, a stringent regulation of the TLS polymerases is essential for the faithful replication of the DNA genome. Here we review the structure and function of the Y-family TLS polymerases and their interactions with ubiquitin and monoubiquitinated PCNA (Ub-PCNA). Driven by the need for monoubiquitinated PCNA in a sufficient quantity and purity, researchers developed both chemical and enzymatic methods for PCNA monoubiquitination, which have propelled our understanding of the structure of Ub-PCNA by X-ray crystallography and small-angle X-ray scattering. Together with studies using a reconstituted polymerase switching assay, these investigations revealed a surprising conformational flexibility of ubiquitin as a modifier on PCNA. Although the molecular details of TLS in cells still need to be deciphered, two working models, polymerase switching and postreplicative gap filling, have been proposed and tested in both in vitro and cellular systems. Evidence for both models is discussed herein. Compared to PCNA monoubiquitination, polyubiquitination of PCNA in DNA damage response is much less well understood and will be the subject of a future investigation. Given the close connection of DNA damage response and anticancer therapy, an in-depth understanding of the eukaryotic translesion synthesis and its regulation by ubiquitin will likely provide new opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Reconstitution of recombination-associated DNA synthesis with human proteins

The repair of DNA breaks by homologous recombination is a high-fidelity process, necessary for the maintenance of genome integrity. Thus, DNA synthesis associated with recombinational repair must be largely error-free. In this report, we show that human DNA polymerase delta (δ) is capable of robust DNA synthesis at RAD51-mediated recombination intermediates dependent on the processivity clamp PCNA. Translesion synthesis polymerase eta (η) also extends these substrates, albeit far less processively. The single-stranded DNA binding protein RPA facilitates recombination-mediated DNA synthesis by increasing the efficiency of primer utilization, preventing polymerase stalling at specific sequence contexts, and overcoming polymerase stalling caused by topological constraint allowing the transition to a migrating D-loop. Our results support a model whereby the high-fidelity replicative DNA polymerase δ performs recombination-associated DNA synthesis, with translesion synthesis polymerases providing a supportive role as in normal replication.

PCNA trimer instability inhibits translesion synthesis by DNA polymerase η and by DNA polymerase δ

Translesion synthesis (TLS), the process by which DNA polymerases replicate through DNA lesions, is the source of most DNA damage-induced mutations. Sometimes TLS is carried out by replicative polymerases that have evolved to synthesize DNA on non-damaged templates. Most of the time, however, TLS is carried out by specialized translesion polymerases that have evolved to synthesize DNA on damaged templates. TLS requires the mono-ubiquitylation of the replication accessory factor proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). PCNA and ubiquitin-modified PCNA (UbPCNA) stimulate TLS by replicative and translesion polymerases. Two mutant forms of PCNA, one with an E113G substitution and one with a G178S substitution, support normal cell growth but inhibit TLS thereby reducing mutagenesis in yeast. A re-examination of the structures of both mutant PCNA proteins revealed substantial disruptions of the subunit interface that forms the PCNA trimer. Both mutant proteins have reduced trimer stability with the G178S substitution causing a more severe defect. The mutant forms of PCNA and UbPCNA do not stimulate TLS of an abasic site by either replicative Pol δ or translesion Pol η. Normal replication by Pol η was also impacted, but normal replication by Pol δ was much less affected. These findings support a model in which reduced trimer stability causes these mutant PCNA proteins to occasionally undergo conformational changes that compromise their ability to stimulate TLS by both replicative and translesion polymerases.

Biochemical analysis of active site mutations of human polymerase η

DNA polymerase η (pol η) plays a critical role in suppressing mutations caused by the bypass of cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) that escape repair. There is evidence this is also the case for the oxidative lesion 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-guanine (8-oxoG). Both of these lesions cause moderate to severe blockage of synthesis when encountered by replicative polymerases, while pol η displays little no to pausing during translesion synthesis. However, since lesion bypass does not remove damaged DNA from the genome and can possibly be accompanied by errors in synthesis during bypass, the process is often called 'damage tolerance' to delineate it from classical DNA repair pathways. The fidelity of lesion bypass is therefore of importance when determining how pol η suppresses mutations after DNA damage. As pol η has been implicated in numerous in vivo pathways other than lesion bypass, we wanted to better understand the molecular mechanisms involved in the relatively low-fidelity synthesis displayed by pol η. To that end, we have created a set of mutant pol η proteins each containing a single amino acid substitution in the active site and closely surrounding regions. We determined overall DNA synthesis ability as well as the efficiency and fidelity of bypass of thymine-thymine CPD (T-T CPD) and 8-oxoG containing DNA templates. Our results show that several amino acids are critical for normal polymerase function, with changes in overall activity and fidelity being observed. Of the mutants that retain polymerase activity, we demonstrate that amino acids Q38, Y52, and R61 play key roles in determining polymerase fidelity, with substation of alanine causing both increases and decreases in fidelity. Remarkably, the Q38A mutant displays increased fidelity during synthesis opposite 8-oxoG but decreased fidelity during synthesis opposite a T-T CPD.

Importance of Polη for damage-induced cohesion reveals differential regulation of cohesion establishment at the break site and genome-wide

Genome integrity depends on correct chromosome segregation, which in turn relies on cohesion between sister chromatids from S phase until anaphase. S phase cohesion, together with DNA double-strand break (DSB) recruitment of cohesin and formation of damage-induced (DI) cohesion, has previously been shown to be required also for efficient postreplicative DSB repair. The budding yeast acetyltransferase Eco1 (Ctf7) is a common essential factor for S phase and DI-cohesion. The fission yeast Eco1 ortholog, Eso1, is expressed as a fusion protein with the translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerase Polη. The involvement of Eso1 in S phase cohesion was attributed to the Eco1 homologous part of the protein and bypass of UV-induced DNA lesions to the Polη part. Here we describe an additional novel function for budding yeast Polη, i.e. formation of postreplicative DI genome-wide cohesion. This is a unique Polη function not shared with other TLS polymerases. However, Polη deficient cells are DSB repair competent, as Polη is not required for cohesion locally at the DSB. This reveals differential regulation of DSB–proximal cohesion and DI genome-wide cohesion, and challenges the importance of the latter for DSB repair. Intriguingly, we found that specific inactivation of DI genome-wide cohesion increases chromosomal mis-segregation at the entrance of the next cell cycle, suggesting that S phase cohesion is not sufficient for correct chromosome segregation in the presence of DNA damage.

Correct chromosome segregation requires that sister chromatids are held together by the protein complex cohesin, from S phase until anaphase. This S phase established cohesion is, together with DSB recruitment of cohesin and formation of damage-induced (DI) cohesion, also important for repair of DSBs. Eco1 is a common essential factor for S phase and DI-cohesion. The fission yeast Eco1 ortholog, Eso1, is important both for S phase cohesion and for bypass of UV-induced lesions, and is expressed as a fusion protein with Polη. The cohesion function has been attributed solely to Eso1 and the lesion bypass function to the Polη part of the protein. As we found the interaction between the two proteins intriguing, we decided to look for a functional connection also in budding yeast. Indeed, despite being dispensable for S phase cohesion, budding yeast Polη is required for formation of DI genome-wide cohesion. However, Polη-deficient cells are DSB repair competent, revealing differential regulation of DI-cohesion at the break and genome-wide. This finding challenges the importance of DI genome-wide cohesion for DSB repair, and based on our findings we suggest that S phase cohesion is not sufficient for correct chromosome segregation in the presence of DNA damage.

Computational protein design suggests that human PCNA-partner interactions are not optimized for affinity

Increasing the affinity of binding proteins is invaluable for basic and applied biological research. Currently, directed protein evolution experiments are the main approach for generating such proteins through the construction and screening of large mutant libraries. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is an essential hub protein that interacts with many different partners to tightly regulate DNA replication and repair in all eukaryotes. Here, we used computational design to generate human PCNA mutants with enhanced affinity for several different partners. We identified double mutations in PCNA, outside the main partner binding site, that were predicted to increase PCNA-partner binding affinities compared to the wild-type protein by forming additional hydrophobic interactions with conserved residues in the PCNA partners. Affinity increases were experimentally validated with four different PCNA partners, demonstrating that computational design can reveal unexpected regions where affinity enhancements in natural systems are possible. The designed PCNA mutants can be used as a valuable tool for further examination of the regulation of PCNA-partner interactions during DNA replication and repair both in vitro and in vivo. More broadly, the ability to engineer affinity increases toward several PCNA partners suggests that interaction affinity is not an evolutionarily optimized trait of this system.

Enhancement of human DNA polymerase η activity and fidelity is dependent upon a bipartite interaction with the Werner syndrome protein

We have investigated the interaction between human DNA polymerase η (hpol η) and the Werner syndrome protein (WRN). Functional assays revealed that the WRN exonuclease and RecQ C-terminal (RQC) domains are necessary for full stimulation of hpol η-catalyzed formation of correct base pairs. We find that WRN does not stimulate hpol η-catalyzed formation of mispairs. Moreover, the exonuclease activity of WRN prevents stable mispair formation by hpol η. These results are consistent with a proofreading activity for WRN during single-nucleotide additions. ATP hydrolysis by WRN appears to attenuate stimulation of hpol η. Pre-steady-state kinetic results show that k(pol) is increased 4-fold by WRN. Finally, pulldown assays reveal a bipartite physical interaction between hpol η and WRN that is mediated by the exonuclease and RQC domains. Taken together, these results are consistent with alteration of the rate-limiting step in polymerase catalysis by direct protein-protein interactions between WRN and hpol η. In summary, WRN improves the efficiency and fidelity of hpol η to promote more effective replication of DNA.

Reversal of PCNA ubiquitylation by Ubp10 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Regulation of PCNA ubiquitylation plays a key role in the tolerance to DNA damage in eukaryotes. Although the evolutionary conserved mechanism of PCNA ubiquitylation is well understood, the deubiquitylation of ubPCNA remains poorly characterized. Here, we show that the histone H2B^K123 ubiquitin protease Ubp10 also deubiquitylates ubPCNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Our results sustain that Ubp10-dependent deubiquitylation of the sliding clamp PCNA normally takes place during S phase, likely in response to the simple presence of ubPCNA. In agreement with this, we show that Ubp10 forms a complex with PCNA in vivo. Interestingly, we also show that deletion of UBP10 alters in different ways the interaction of PCNA with DNA polymerase ζ–associated protein Rev1 and with accessory subunit Rev7. While deletion of UBP10 enhances PCNA–Rev1 interaction, it decreases significantly Rev7 binding to the sliding clamp. Finally, we report that Ubp10 counteracts Rad18 E3-ubiquitin ligase activity on PCNA at lysine 164 in such a manner that deregulation of Ubp10 expression causes tolerance impairment and MMS hypersensitivity.

DNA damage is a major source of genome instability and cancer. A universal mechanism of DNA damage tolerance is based on translesion synthesis (TLS) by specialized low-fidelity DNA polymerases capable of replicating over DNA lesions during replication. Translesion synthesis requires the switch between replicative and TLS DNA polymerases, and this switching is controlled through the ubiquitylation of the proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a processivity factor for DNA synthesis. It is thought that DNA polymerase switching is a reversible process that has a favorable outcome for cells in the prevention of irreversible DNA replication forks collapse. However, the low-fidelity nature of TLS polymerases has unfavorable consequences like the increased risk of mutations opposite to DNA lesions. Here we identify Ubp10 as an enzyme controlling PCNA deubiquitylation in the model yeast S. cerevisiae. The identification of Ubp10 is a first step that will allow us to understand its biological significance and its potential role as part of a safeguard mechanism limiting the residence time of TLS DNA polymerases on replicating chromatin in eukaryotes.

A broad requirement for TLS polymerases η and κ, and interacting sumoylation and nuclear pore proteins, in lesion bypass during C. elegans embryogenesis

Translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases are specialized DNA polymerases capable of inserting nucleotides opposite DNA lesions that escape removal by dedicated DNA repair pathways. TLS polymerases allow cells to complete DNA replication in the presence of damage, thereby preventing checkpoint activation, genome instability, and cell death. Here, we characterize functional knockouts for polh-1 and polk-1, encoding the Caenorhabditis elegans homologs of the Y-family TLS polymerases η and κ. POLH-1 acts at many different DNA lesions as it protects cells against a wide range of DNA damaging agents, including UV, γ-irradiation, cisplatin, and methyl methane sulphonate (MMS). POLK-1 acts specifically but redundantly with POLH-1 in protection against methylation damage. Importantly, both polymerases play a prominent role early in embryonic development to allow fast replication of damaged genomes. Contrary to observations in mammalian cells, we show that neither POLH-1 nor POLK-1 is required for homologous recombination (HR) repair of DNA double-strand breaks. A genome-wide RNAi screen for genes that protect the C. elegans genome against MMS–induced DNA damage identified novel components in DNA damage bypass in the early embryo. Our data suggest SUMO-mediated regulation of both POLH-1 and POLK-1, and point towards a previously unrecognized role of the nuclear pore in regulating TLS.

Unrepaired DNA damage on the template strand poses a problem for the progression of the replication fork. Specialized translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases are capable of bypassing DNA lesions without repairing them. Here, we use the nematode C. elegans, to show that there is modulation of the choice between repair and bypass during development. We show that during gametogenesis and later development repair dominates, while there is a short phase during embryonic development where resistance to damage depends heavily on TLS polymerases. The rapid divisions at this stage do not allow for delay in which repair processes can occur. Furthermore, we identify new factors that may play a role in the regulation of TLS during early embryogenesis.