[Comparison of high-resolution liquid chromatography versus microparticle enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of sirolimus levels in renal transplantation]

Development and validation of an HPLC method for the analysis of sirolimus in drug products

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a simple, rapid and sensitive reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for quantification of sirolimus (SRL) in pharmaceutical dosage forms.

METHODS

The chromatographic system employs isocratic elution using a Knauer- C18, 5 mm, 4.6 × 150 mm. Mobile phase consisting of acetonitril and ammonium acetate buffer set at flow rate 1.5 ml/min. The analyte was detected and quantified at 278nm using ultraviolet detector. The method was validated as per ICH guidelines.

RESULTS

The standard curve was found to have a linear relationship (r(2) > 0.99) over the analytical range of 125-2000ng/ml. For all quality control (QC) standards in intraday and interday assay, accuracy and precision range were -0.96 to 6.30 and 0.86 to 13.74 respectively, demonstrating the precision and accuracy over the analytical range. Samples were stable during preparation and analysis procedure.

CONCLUSION

Therefore the rapid and sensitive developed method can be used for the routine analysis of sirolimus such as dissolution and stability assays of pre- and post-marketed dosage forms.

Determination of blood sirolimus concentrations in liver and kidney transplant recipients using the Innofluor fluorescence polarization immunoassay: comparison with the microparticle enzyme immunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method

BACKGROUND

Although high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the method of choice for blood sirolimus determination, the microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) run on the IMx analyser is widely used in therapeutic monitoring of this immunosuppressant agent. The aim of our study was to evaluate the possible determination of sirolimus using the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) commercialized for everolimus quantification.

METHODS

Sirolimus concentrations were determined in whole-blood samples from liver and kidney transplant recipients using the Innofluor Certican FPIA (Seradyn Inc.) run on a TDx analyser (Abbott Laboratories), Sirolimus MEIA run on an IMx analyser (Abbott Laboratories), and HPLC (UV detection) methods.

RESULTS

The Innofluor FPIA has a similar cross-reactivity with everolimus and sirolimus, and the within- and between-run coefficients of variation obtained for sirolimus determination were 2.7%-13.3%. In analysing different blood samples from liver and kidney transplant patients the linear regressions obtained were: FPIA = 1.12 HPLC + 0.43 (n=104, r=0.874), MEIA = 1.14 HPLC (n=146, r=0.892), and FPIA = 1.00 MEIA + 0.29 (n=106, r=0.941). Better correlation coefficients were obtained between the methods in the liver transplant samples (r>or=0.900) than in the kidney transplant samples (r>or=0.849). No significant effect was found for sirolimus clearance or the blood hematocrit on the relationship between the results produced by both immunoassays and HPLC.

CONCLUSION

The Innofluor FPIA is a valid alternative with an analogous performance to the MEIA for the therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus.