[Insisting on intravenous polyvalent immunoglobulin therapy in polymyositis in spite of the occurrence of sever hemolytic anemia]

Critical review of the role of intravenous immunoglobulins in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to summarize key findings from the literature concerning the therapeutic role of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), dissecting the evidence according to disease subtype and treatment indication, and to review the evidence relating to the mechanism of action of IVIg in IIM to ascertain rationale for continued research.

METHODS

Medline (Ovid) and Pubmed databases were searched from inception to July 2016 using relevant keywords. Original and review articles were retrieved for full-text review. Bibliographies of selected articles were also hand-searched for additional references. Data were summarized qualitatively and in tabular form.

RESULTS

The efficacy of IVIg in IIM is supported by 3 randomized controlled trials, involving dermatomyositis and polymyositis subjects, in refractory, relapsed, or steroid-dependent disease, as well as part of first-line therapy in elderly dermatomyositis subjects. Other indications for IVIg are supported by uncontrolled evidence only. Limitations of studies include open, uncontrolled or retrospective study designs, small and selected samples, short-term follow-up and ad hoc outcome measures. Despite the limited evidence, there is strong biological plausibility for the role of IVIg in IIM.

CONCLUSION

Robust, controlled evidence to support the use of IVIg using validated outcome measures is urgently required to guide therapeutic decision-making and maximize outcomes in IIM.

On the dark side of therapies with immunoglobulin concentrates: the adverse events

Therapy by human immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrates is a success story ongoing for decades with an ever increasing demand for this plasma product. The success of IgG concentrates on a clinical level is documented by the slowly increasing number of registered indication and the more rapid increase of the off-label uses, a topic dealt with in another contribution to this special issue of Frontiers in Immunology. A part of the success is the adverse event (AE) profile of IgG concentrates which is, even at life-long need for therapy, excellent. Transmission of pathogens in the last decade could be entirely controlled through the antecedent introduction by authorities of a regulatory network and installing quality standards by the plasma fractionation industry. The cornerstone of the regulatory network is current good manufacturing practice. Non-infectious AEs occur rarely and mainly are mild to moderate. However, in recent times, the increase in frequency of hemolytic and thrombotic AEs raised worrying questions on the possible background for these AEs. Below, we review elements of non-infectious AEs, and particularly focus on hemolysis and thrombosis. We discuss how the introduction of plasma fractionation by ion-exchange chromatography and polishing by immunoaffinity chromatographic steps might alter repertoire of specificities and influence AE profiles and efficacy of IgG concentrates.

After eight-year-tolerance minimal i.v. anti-D infusions unleash hemolysis in a patient with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)

Minimal doses of i.v. anti-D for ITP are not exempt from the risk of intravascular hemolysis, a rare potentially severe short-lived post-infusion complication. We report here on an elderly woman with chronic pancytopenia and splenomegaly in whom bleeding manifestations ceased after i.v. anti-Rh(D) immunoglobulin minidoses replaced long-term conventional treatment for immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Anti-Rh(D) infusions, that had been well tolerated for eight years, became the main culprit in triggering of disproportionate hemolysis. In spite of in crescendo complication, the anti-Rh(D) immunoglobulin schedule was maintained for another six months. With no further treatment, the patient's health remains stable 20 months later.

Adverse effect of polyvalent immunoglobulin in the treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acute polyradiculoneuropathy or Guillain-Barre syndrome is a neurological disease which may present with severe forms which have a poor prognosis. The patient's management requires multidisciplinary specialised care. Morbidity has been reported to be significantly improved with initial therapy using high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). However, this therapy represent an immunological risk which has remained overlooked by clinicians in the majority of cases and is not clearly stated by the pharmaceutical companies. Therefore, the use of IVIG in the intensive care unit can cause some problems.

CASE REPORT

A 32-year-old woman presented with clinical signs of Guillain-Barre syndrome. The patient received high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (TEGELINE). Nine days after beginning therapy, she presented with severe immunological hemolytic anaemia; the IVIG was suspected as the cause. The blood cell count returned to normal approximately two months after the onset of the hemolytic syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Despite the effectiveness of IVIG therapy in the management of various diseases, intensive care clinicians should be aware of possible major adverse effects which make a careful assessment of the patient necessary before treatment. It may also be important to consider the patient's ABO blood group before initiating IVIG treatment, particularly in patients bearing A and/or B blood group antigens.