The rodent carcinogens 1,4-dioxane and thiourea induce meiotic non-disjunction in Drosophila melanogaster females

In vivo effects of 1,4-dioxane on genotoxic parameters and behavioral alterations in Drosophila melanogaster

1,4-Dioxane (DXN) is used as solvent in different consumer products including cosmetics, paints, surfactants, and waxes. In addition, DXN is released as an unwanted contaminating by-product as a result of some reactions including ethoxylation of alcohols, which occurs with in personal care products. Consequently, DXN pollution was detected in drinking water and is considered as an environmental problem. At present, the genotoxicity effects attributed to DXN are controversial. The present study using an in vivo model organism Drosophila melanogaster aimed to determine the toxic/genotoxic, mutagenic/recombinogenic, oxidative damage as evidenced by ROS production, phenotypic alterations as well as behavioral and developmental alterations that are closely related to neuronal functions. Data demonstrated that nontoxic DXN concentration (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, or 1%) induced mutagenic (1%) and recombinogenic (0.1, 0.25, or 0.5%) effects in wing spot test and genotoxicity in hemocytes using comet assay. The nontoxic concentrations of DXN (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, or 1%) significantly increased oxidative stress, climbing behavior, thermal sensivity and abnormal phenotypic alterations. Our findings show that in contrast to in vitro exposure, DXN using an in vivo model Drosophila melanogaster this compound exerts toxic and genotoxic effects. Data suggest that additional studies using other in vivo models are thus warranted.

An updated evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of 1,4-dioxane

This paper presents a critical review of the information pertaining to the potential carcinogenicity of 1,4-dioxane. The primary target organs for cancer via the oral route are the liver and the nasal cavity, however, the relevance of nasal cavity tumors to human exposures has been questioned. Liver tumors were accompanied by degenerative changes and appear only to occur at high doses where clearance mechanisms are saturated and liver toxicity is significant. Genetic toxicity data suggests that 1,4-dioxane is a very weak genotoxin. An increase in hepatocyte cell proliferation was reported and 1,4-dioxane was shown to act as a tumor promoter in rat liver and mouse skin carcinogenicity assays. Two reports are available from the literature regarding physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approaches to assess the risk of liver cancer for 1,4-dioxane. A comparison of cancer risk estimates from linear and nonlinear models in the presence or absence of PBPK modeling suggests that USEPAs current cancer slope factor significantly overestimates the potential cancer risk from 1,4-dioxane. This critical review of the scientific literature indicates that a formal reevaluation of the carcinogenic potency of 1,4-dioxane is warranted.

Chromosome malsegregation induced by the rodent carcinogens acetamide, pyridine and diethanolamine in Drosophila melanogaster females

The effect of the rodent carcinogens acetamide (AC), pyridine (PY) and diethanolamine (DEA) on meiotic chromosome segregation was assessed in 4-day-old Drosophila melanogaster females. After oral treatment with 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% PY; 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 4% AC; or 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80% DEA, the females were mated to 7-day-old males and three 24h broods were obtained to sample cells exposed mainly as mature oocytes (brood I), and nearly mature oocytes (brood II) with an increasing proportion of early oocytes (brood III). Viability was not affected at the two (PY) or three (AC, DEA) lowest concentrations, decreasing thereafter. PY increased the frequency of nondisjunction exclusively in brood II suggesting its interaction with specific targets. AC and DEA (the most active of the three) induced similar frequencies of nondisjunction in all broods suggesting unspecific cell division perturbations probably due to toxicity. No clear dose effect relationships were observed.