Chronic infusion of dobutamine and nitroprusside in patients with end-stage heart failure awaiting heart transplantation: safety and clinical outcome

Sodium nitroprusside infusion in patients with advanced heart failure

AIMS

Advanced heart failure (AdvHF) poses significant treatment challenges, particularly when mechanical circulatory support or transplant options are unavailable, highlighting a gap in evidence-based medical management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of sodium nitroprusside infusion (SNP) for enhancing systemic and renal perfusion in patients with AdvHF, with or without concomitant inotropic support.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 406 patients with AdvHF admitted between October 2014 and September 2018 who received nocturnal SNP infusions for at least one week. In 55 patients with symptomatic hypotension or signs of peripheral hypoperfusion (differential systemic BP < 15 mmHg), continuous dobutamine infusion was added. In a subset of 155 patients who required multiple hospitalizations (median 3), data from the last hospitalization were used. No symptomatic hypotension leading to discontinuation of SNP (mean dose: 0.5 ± 0.1 μg/kg/min) was reported. Patients showed a significant increase in differential systemic blood pressure after infusion (29.2 ± 8.1 to 36.8 ± 11.6 mmHg, p < 0.001) independent of dobutamine use. Administration of SNP and dobutamine resulted in greater weight loss compared to SNP alone (-5.33 ± 7.02 vs -3.32 ± 4.0 kg, p < 0.003), but it was also associated with a significant increase in creatinine levels compared to SNP alone (+0.24 ± 0.87 vs +0.02 ± 0.43, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that SNP is a safe therapeutic choice in AdvHF patients with or without concomitant inotropic support and highlight the potential efficacy of nitroprusside in improving systemic and renal perfusion in these advanced patients.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Intermittent, Repeated, or Continuous Use of Levosimendan, Milrinone, or Dobutamine in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: A Network and Single-Arm Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to synthesize the available evidence regarding differences in the long-term safety and efficacy of intermittent, repeated, or continuous palliative inotropic therapy among patients with advanced heart failure. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases, with a cutoff date of November 23, 2023, for studies reporting outcomes in adult patients with advanced heart failure treated with intermittent, repeated, or continuous levosimendan, milrinone, or dobutamine. Forty-one studies (18 randomized controlled trials and 23 cohort studies) comprising 5137 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of the network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed that levosimendan had significant advantages over milrinone or dobutamine in reducing mortality and improving left ventricular ejection fraction. A single-arm meta-analysis also indicated that levosimendan had the lowest mortality and significantly improved B-type brain natriuretic peptide and left ventricular ejection fraction. Regarding safety, hypotension events were observed more frequently in the levosimendan and milrinone groups. However, the current evidence is limited by the heterogeneity and relatively small sample size of the studies.

Sodium nitroprusside for advanced heart failure. A metanalysis of literature data

Advanced heart failure (HF) is associated with a very poor prognosis and places a big burden on health-care services. The gold standard treatment, i.e. long-term mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation, is precluded in many patients but observational studies suggest that the use of SNP might be associated with favourable long-term clinical outcomes. We performed a metanalysis of published studies that compared sodium nitroprusside (SNP) with optimal medical therapy to examine the safety and efficacy of SNP as part of the treatment regimen of patients hospitalized for advanced heart failure (HF). We searched PUBMED, EMBASE and WEB OF SCIENCE for studies that compared SNP with optimal medical therapy in advanced HF on July 2022. After screening 700 full-text articles, data from two original articles were included in a combined analysis. The analysis demonstrated a 66% reduction in the odds of death in advanced HF patients treated with SNP. The results show the potential importance of the inclusion of SNP in the treatment regimen of patients hospitalized because of advanced HF and underlines that controlled, randomized studies are still required in this condition.

Old and New Drugs for Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Advanced heart failure (HF) is a progressive disease with high mortality and limited medical therapeutic options. Long-term mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation remain goldstandard treatments for these patients; however, access to these therapies is limited by the advanced age and multiple comorbidities of affected patients, as well as by the limited number of organs available.

METHODS

Traditional and new drugs available for the treatment of advanced HF have been researched.

RESULTS

To date, the cornerstone for the treatment of patients with advanced HF remains water restriction, intravenous loop diuretic therapy and inotropic support. However, many patients with advanced HF experience loop diuretics resistance and alternative therapeutic strategies to overcome this problem have been developed, including sequential nephron blockade or use of the hypertonic saline solution in combination with high-doses of furosemide. As classic inotropes augment myocardial oxygen consumption, new promising drugs have been introduced, including levosimendan, istaroxime and omecamtiv mecarbil. However, pharmacological agents still remain mainly short-term or palliative options in patients with acute decompensation or excluded from mechanical therapy.

CONCLUSION

Traditional drugs, especially when administered in combination, and new medicaments represent important therapeutic options in advanced HF. However, their impact on prognosis remains unclear. Large trials are necessary to clarify their therapeutic potential and prognostic role in these fragile patients.

Hyperoside protects against heart failure-induced liver fibrosis in rats

Heart failure (HF) is an end-stage of various serious cardiovascular diseases, which causes liver injury. Hyperoside has been reported to exert protective effect on liver injury and fibrosis. However, the role and related mechanisms of hyperoside in HF-induced liver fibrosis are still unclear. In the current study, we established a model of HF via aortocaval fistula (ACF) in rats in vivo. Hyperoside treatment in ACF rats increased cardiac output, the maximum peak rate of rise/fall in left ventricular pressure (+dP/dt, -dP/dt) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF), decreased LV end-systolic pressure (LVESP), LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and reduced heart weight/body weight ratio in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, hyperoside could attenuate liver fibrosis and injury in ACF rats, as evidenced by reduction of fibrosis area and hydroxyproline content, amelioration of edema and degeneration of liver cell vacuoles, and inhibition of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. Further, α-smooth-muscle actin (α-SMA), collagen I, profibrotic factor-connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) and MMP9 levels were down-regulated in hyperoside-treated ACF rats. Additionally, hyperoside inhibited the activation of TGF-β1/Smad pathway. Finally, we confirmed that hyperoside suppressed TGF-β1-mediated hepatic stellate cell activation in vitro. Collectively, hyperoside showed a suppressive role in HF-induced liver fibrosis and injury.

Is Exercise Training Appropriate for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Receiving Continuous Inotropic Infusion? A Review

Exercise-based rehabilitation programs have been reported to have beneficial effects for patients with heart failure. However, there is little evidence about whether this is the case in patients with more severe heart failure. In particular, there is a question in the clinical setting whether patients with advanced heart failure and continuous inotropic infusion should be prescribed exercise training. In contrast, many studies conclude that prolonged immobility associated with heart failure profoundly impairs physical function and promotes muscle wasting that could further hasten the course of heart failure. By contrast, exercise training has various effects not only in improving exercise capacity but also on vascular function, skeletal muscle, and autonomic balance. In this review, we summarize the effectiveness and discuss methods of exercise training in patients with advanced heart failure receiving continuous inotropic agents such as dobutamine.

Repetitive use of levosimendan in advanced heart failure: need for stronger evidence in a field in dire need of a useful therapy

Patients in the latest stages of heart failure are severely compromised, with poor quality of life and frequent hospitalizations. Heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device implantation are viable options only for a minority, and intermittent or continuous infusions of positive inotropes may be needed as a bridge therapy or as a symptomatic approach. In these settings, levosimendan has potential advantages over conventional inotropes (catecholamines and phosphodiesterase inhibitors), such as sustained effects after initial infusion, synergy with beta-blockers, and no increase in oxygen consumption. Levosimendan has been suggested as a treatment that reduces re-hospitalization and improves quality of life. However, previous clinical studies of intermittent infusions of levosimendan were not powered to show statistical significance on key outcome parameters. A panel of 45 expert clinicians from 12 European countries met in Rome on November 24-25, 2016 to review the literature and envision an appropriately designed clinical trial addressing these needs. In the earlier FIGHT trial (daily subcutaneous injection of liraglutide in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction) a composite Global Rank Score was used as primary end-point where death, re-hospitalization, and change in N-terminal-prohormone-brain natriuretic peptide level were considered in a hierarchical order. In the present study, we tested the same end-point post hoc in the PERSIST and LEVOREP trials on oral and repeated i.v. levosimendan, respectively, and demonstrated superiority of levosimendan treatment vs placebo. The use of the same composite end-point in a properly powered study on repetitive levosimendan in advanced heart failure is strongly advocated.

The patient perspective: Quality of life in advanced heart failure with frequent hospitalisations

End of life is an unfortunate but inevitable phase of the heart failure patients' journey. It is often preceded by a stage in the progression of heart failure defined as advanced heart failure, and characterised by poor quality of life and frequent hospitalisations. In clinical practice, the efficacy of treatments for advanced heart failure is often assessed by parameters such as clinical status, haemodynamics, neurohormonal status, and echo/MRI indices. From the patients' perspective, however, quality-of-life-related parameters, such as functional capacity, exercise performance, psychological status, and frequency of re-hospitalisations, are more significant. The effects of therapies and interventions on these parameters are, however, underrepresented in clinical trials targeted to assess advanced heart failure treatment efficacy, and data are overall scarce. This is possibly due to a non-universal definition of the quality-of-life-related endpoints, and to the difficult standardisation of the data collection. These uncertainties also lead to difficulties in handling trade-off decisions between quality of life and survival by patients, families and healthcare providers. A panel of 34 experts in the field of cardiology and intensive cardiac care from 21 countries around the world convened for reviewing the existing data on quality-of-life in patients with advanced heart failure, discussing and reaching a consensus on the validity and significance of quality-of-life assessment methods. Gaps in routine care and research, which should be addressed, were identified. Finally, published data on the effects of current i.v. vasoactive therapies such as inotropes, inodilators, and vasodilators on quality-of-life in advanced heart failure patients were analysed.

Sodium nitroprusside in 2014: A clinical concepts review

Sodium nitroprusside has been used in clinical practice as an arterial and venous vasodilator for 40 years. This prodrug reacts with physiologic sulfhydryl groups to release nitric oxide, causing rapid vasodilation, and acutely lowering blood pressure. It is used clinically in cardiac surgery, hypertensive crises, heart failure, vascular surgery, pediatric surgery, and other acute hemodynamic applications. In some practices, newer agents have replaced nitroprusside, either because they are more effective or because they have a more favorable side-effect profile. However, valid and adequately-powered efficacy studies are sparse and do not identify a superior agent for all indications. The cyanide anion release concurrent with nitroprusside administration is associated with potential cyanide accumulation and severe toxicity. Agents to ameliorate the untoward effects of cyanide are limited by various problems in their practicality and effectiveness. A new orally bioavailable antidote is sodium sulfanegen, which shows promise in reversing this toxicity. The unique effectiveness of nitroprusside as a titratable agent capable of rapid blood pressure control will likely maintain its utilization in clinical practice for the foreseeable future. Additional research will refine and perhaps expand indications for nitroprusside, while parallel investigation continues to develop effective antidotes for cyanide poisoning.

Inotropes do not increase mortality in advanced heart failure

Inotrope use is one of the most controversial topics in the management of heart failure. While the heart failure community utilizes them and recognizes the state of inotrope dependency, retrospective analyses and registry data have overwhelmingly suggested high mortality, which is logically to be expected given the advanced disease states of those requiring their use. Currently, there is a relative paucity of randomized control trials due to the ethical dilemma of creating control groups by withholding inotropes from patients who require them. Nonetheless, results of such trials have been mixed. Many were also performed with agents no longer in use, on patients without an indication for inotropes, or at a time before automatic cardio-defibrillators were recommended for primary prevention. Thus, their results may not be generalizable to current clinical practice. In this review, we discuss current indications for inotrope use, specifically dobutamine and milrinone, depicting their mechanisms of action, delineating their patterns of use in clinical practice, defining the state of inotrope dependency, and ultimately examining the literature to ascertain whether evidence is sufficient to support the current view that these agents increase mortality in patients with heart failure. Our conclusion is that the evidence is insufficient to link inotropes and increased mortality in low output heart failure.

Effect of levosimendan on the short-term clinical course of patients with acutely decompensated heart failure

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of levosimendan, a positive inotropic drug with vasodilator effects, given intravenously to patients with acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

METHODS

We performed 2 sequential trials, the first to develop a new measure of efficacy in 100 patients, and the second to use this measure to evaluate levosimendan in an additional 600 patients. Patients admitted with ADHF received placebo or intravenous levosimendan for 24 h in addition to standard treatment. The primary endpoint was a composite that evaluated changes in clinical status during the first 5 days after randomization.

RESULTS

In the 600-patient trial, more levosimendan than placebo patients (58 vs. 44) were improved at all 3 pre-specified time points (6 h, 24 h, and 5 days), whereas fewer levosimendan patients (58 vs. 82) experienced clinical worsening (p = 0.015 for the difference between the groups). These differences were apparent, despite more frequent intensification of adjunctive therapy in the placebo group (79 vs. 45 patients). Improvements in patient self-assessment and declines in B-type natriuretic peptide levels with levosimendan persisted for 5 days and were associated with reduced length of stay (p = 0.009). Similar findings were present in the 100-patient pilot trial. Levosimendan was associated with more frequent hypotension and cardiac arrhythmias during the infusion period and a numerically higher risk of death across the 2 trials (49 of 350 on a regimen of levosimendan vs. 40 of 350 on a regimen of placebo at 90 days, p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ADHF, intravenous levosimendan provided rapid and durable symptomatic relief. As dosed in this trial, levosimendan was associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. (Evaluation of Intravenous Levosimendan Efficacy in the Short Term Treatment of Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure; NCT00048425).

Nitroprusside in decompensated heart failure: what should a clinician really know?

Sodium nitroprusside is an older intravenous vasodilator appropriate for acute hospital treatment of patients with congestive heart failure. It is a balanced arterial and venous vasodilator with a very short half-life, facilitating rapid titration. In general, it improves hemodynamic and clinical status by reducing systemic vascular resistance, left ventricular filling pressure, and increasing cardiac output. This review summarizes recently published literature and recent data regarding the use of this intravenous vasodilator in decompensated heart failure patients.

Vasodilators in the management of acute heart failure

Recent guidelines by the Heart Failure Society of America have recommended consideration for use of nitroprusside, nitroglycerin, or nesiritide in addition to diuretics to achieve hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement. This article reviews the results of previous studies evaluating the pharmacologic and clinical effects and safety profiles of these drugs in patients with heart failure.

Haemodynamic effects of intravenous quinaprilat in comparison to sodium nitroprusside in patients with chronic heart failure

We compared the haemodynamic effects of intravenous boluses of the ACE inhibitor quinaprilat with an intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside in 23 patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV). At the highest drug doses, sodium nitroprusside significantly increased stroke volume index (+6.63 ml/m(2), p=0.045), whereas quinaprilat induced only a minor increase (+1.79 ml/m(2), n.s.).

Management of diuretic-refractory, volume-overloaded patients with acutely decompensated heart failure

Fluid overload is a common presentation for decompensated heart failure, yet management strategies are poorly defined because of relatively few randomized clinical trials that delineate an optimal strategy. Patients refractory to diuretic therapy may be considered for treatment with inotropes or vasodilators, and others may be considered for venovenous ultrafiltration. The rationale for use of each therapy is reviewed.

The use of recombinant human B-type natriuretic peptide (nesiritide) in the management of acute decompensated heart failure

Nesiritide is a synthetic human B-type natriuretic factor that has a balanced arterial and venous dilator effect, with natriuretic, diuretic, anti-aldosterone and antisympathetic action. It was launched in the US for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in August 2001 and, recently, in Switzerland and Israel. It has been demonstrated to provide more rapid and sustained haemodynamic stabilisation than glyceryl trinitrate and significant symptomatic improvement vs. placebo at 3 h, and to be safer than dobutamine. The main side effects associated with nesiritide therapy are asymptomatic and symptomatic hypotension, which are treated with dose reduction. When compared to dobutamine, the increased acquisition costs of nesiritide are completely offset by reduced intensity of hospital admissions and reduced readmission rate at 3 weeks.

Prognostic implications of echocardiography in advanced heart failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The growing epidemic of systolic congestive heart failure mandates strategies to identify accurately people with high morbidity and mortality. Echocardiography remains the most widely available noninvasive tool for the assessment of cardiac structure, function, and hemodynamics. Clinical data paired with echocardiographic analysis in patients with systolic heart failure obtained from a variety of investigations have allowed for the evaluation of this modality as a prognostic tool.

RECENT FINDINGS

Detailed appraisal of the literature has revealed five distinct, easy-to-evaluate echocardiographic parameters that may assist clinicians to segregate high-risk patients. The presence of or the inability to modify a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 25%, impaired right ventricular function (assessed by any of four methods), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension greater than 6.5 to 7 cm, a restrictive mitral inflow, or pulmonary hypertension (peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity >2.5 m/s) should alert clinicians of patients with high morbidity (recurrent congestive heart failure admission, arrhythmia, impaired functional capacity) and mortality. Particularly important among these variables is the presence of a restrictive mitral inflow pattern.

SUMMARY

Detailed analysis of two-dimensional and Doppler data routinely obtained from echocardiograms has established prognostic implications among patients with systolic heart failure. Although prospective clinical trials are lacking, the use of echocardiography to segregate risk should be incorporated into current strategies to treat congestive heart failure and influence clinical listing for cardiac transplantation.

Tratamiento inotrópico en la insuficiencia cardíaca: aspectos generales y resultados clínicos

Classic inotropic agents such as beta-adrenergic agonists and phosphodiesterase III inhibitors have beneficial but transitory hemodynamic effects in patients with acute and chronic heart failure. In this context, the available data suggest that long term inotropic therapy has a negative impact on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. For this reason, these agents are mainly used for the treatment of refractory episodes of decompensation and they are also used as a "bridge" (transplant, revascularization, recovery) or as a palliative measure. We present a revision of the general aspects of inotropes including main published clinical trials and some findings of its combined use with beta blockers. Furthermore, we describe a promising and differential therapeutic approach represented by calcium sensitizer agents (levosimendan).

Positive inotropic and lusitropic effects of HNO/NO- in failing hearts: independence from beta-adrenergic signaling

Nitroxyl anion (HNONO(-)), the one-electron reduced form of nitric oxide (NO), induces positive cardiac inotropy and selective venodilation in the normal in vivo circulation. Here we tested whether HNO/NO(-) augments systolic and diastolic function of failing hearts, and whether contrary to NO/nitrates such modulation enhances rather than blunts beta-adrenergic stimulation and is accompanied by increased plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). HNO/NO(-) generated by Angelis' salt (AS) was infused (10 microg/kg per min, i.v.) to conscious dogs with cardiac failure induced by chronic tachycardia pacing. AS nearly doubled contractility, enhanced relaxation, and lowered cardiac preload and afterload (all P < 0.001) without altering plasma cGMP. This contrasted to modest systolic depression induced by an NO donor diethylamine(DEA)NO or nitroglycerin (NTG). Cardiotropic changes from AS were similar in failing hearts as in controls despite depressed beta-adrenergic and calcium signaling in the former. Inotropic effects of AS were additive to dobutamine, whereas DEA/NO blunted beta-stimulation and NTG was neutral. Administration of propranolol to nonfailing hearts fully blocked isoproterenol stimulation but had minimal effect on AS inotropy and enhanced lusitropy. Arterial plasma CGRP rose 3-fold with AS but was unaltered by DEA/NO or NTG, supporting a proposed role of this peptide to HNO/NO(-) cardiotropic action. Thus, HNO/NO(-) has positive inotropic and lusitropic action, which unlike NO/nitrates is independent and additive to beta-adrenergic stimulation and stimulates CGRP release. This suggests potential of HNO/NO(-) donors for the treatment of heart failure.

Role of nonglycosidic inotropic agents: indications, ethics, and limitations

Nonglycosidic inotropic agents have been used for the short-term management of low output states and hypotension complicating acute myocardial infarction for several years. Without adequate reperfusion of the ischemic myocardium, inotropic agents are seldom effective in producing sustained hemodynamic responses. Furthermore, the potential exists for enhancement of ischemia and extension of myocardial necrosis. Thus, inotropic and vasopressors therapy should be regarded as temporary supportive treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome and should be discontinued as soon as feasible. Parenteral sympathomimetic agents, usually dobutamine, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors, usually milrinone, are used for the management of exacerbations of chronic systolic heart failure. Although hemodynamics, and occasionally clinical status, improve, such therapy is associated with increased mortality and can potentially hasten a patient's demise. Nonparenteral sympathomimetics, such as ibopamine, phosphodiesterase-III inhibitors, such as milrinone and enoximone, calcium-sensitizing agents, such as pimobendan, and other novel inotropic agents, such as vesnarinone, all increase mortality of patients with chronic heart failure. Furthermore, newer noninotropic agents, such as B-natriuretic peptide, have been introduced for treatment of decompensated heart failure. New nonpharmacologic devices, such as biventricular pacing, are available for the treatment of advanced heart failure. Thus, indications for the use of presently available nonglycosidic inotropic agents are limited and should be considered only for short-term therapy or when no other treatment is available.

Pharmacotherapeutic approaches for decompensated heart failure: a role for the calcium sensitiser, levosimendan?

Although no universal definition exists, decompensated heart failure may be regarded as either a worsening of chronic heart failure or new-onset heart failure precipitated by an acute incident. Haemodynamic management of patients hospitalised with decompensated heart failure may include the administration of diuretics, vasodilators and positive inotropic agents. Until recently, these latter agents constituted the only drug class to produce a direct increase in stroke volume via enhanced myocardial contractility. However, despite their short-term benefits, the clinical utility of inotropic agents is compromised by their potentially deleterious effects on calcium handling and oxygen consumption, resulting in an increased risk of serious ventricular arrhythmias and death. In contrast, calcium sensitisers enhance cardiac performance without affecting calcium movement and, therefore, are potentially associated with a reduced risk of rhythmic disturbances. These agents constitute a heterogeneous group of compounds with different affinities for calcium sensitisation. Levosimendan is a potent calcium sensitiser with vasodilating properties that has been shown to provide symptomatic and haemodynamic improvement with no increase in oxygen consumption. Calcium sensitisation is therefore emerging as a promising treatment approach in this challenging therapeutic area.

Emergence of Laplace therapeutics: declaring an end to end-stage heart failure

A large number of chronic heart failure patients escape from the benefits of neurohormonal blockade only to transit into a discouragingly miserable state of what the physician often refers to as end-stage heart failure. Conceptually, the designation of end-stage as a description of a clinical scenario implies pessimism concerning recourse to a therapeutic avenue. A variety of surgical therapeutic techniques that take advantage of the law of Laplace, designed to effectively restore the cardiac shape from a spherical, mechanically inefficient pump to a more elliptical, structurally sound organ are now being employed. Additionally, the field of mechanical device implantation is surging ahead at a rapid pace. The weight of evidence regarding mechanical unloading using assist devices suggests that hemodynamic restoration is accompanied by regression of cellular hypertrophy, normalization of the neuroendocrine axis, improved expression of contractile proteins, enhanced cellular respiratory control, and decreases in markers of apoptosis and cellular stress. Thus, these lines of data point toward discarding the notion of end-stage heart failure. We are at a new crossroad in our quest to tackle chronic heart failure. It is our contention that the use of antiremodeling strategies, including device approaches, will soon signal the end of end-stage heart failure.