Clinical trials update from the European Society of Cardiology: CARMEN, EARTH, OPTIMAAL, ACE, TEN-HMS, MAGIC, SOLVD-X and PATH-CHF II

Low documentation of chronic kidney disease among high-risk patients in a managed care population: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Early detection of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is sub-optimal among the general population and among high risk patients. The prevalence and impact of major CKD risk factors, diabetes (DM) and hypertension (HTN), on CKD documentation among managed care populations have not been previously reported. We examined this issue in a Kaiser Permanente Georgia (KPG) CKD cohort.

METHODS

KPG enrollees were included in the CKD cohort if they had eGFRs between 60 and 365 days apart that were <90 ml/min during 1999-2006. The current analysis is restricted to participants with eGFR 10-59 ml/min/1.73 m2. CKD documentation was defined as a presenting diagnosis of CKD by a primary care physician or nephrologist using ICD-9 event codes. The association between CKD documentation and DM and HTN were assessed with multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 50,438 subjects within the overall KPG CKD cohort, 20% (N = 10,266) were eligible for inclusion in the current analysis. Overall, CKD diagnosis documentation was low; only 14.4% of subjects had an event-based CKD diagnosis at baseline. Gender and types 2 diabetes interacted on CKD documentation. The prevalence of CKD documentation increased with the presence of hypertension and/or type 2 diabetes, but type 2 diabetes had a lower effect on CKD documentation. In multivariate analysis, significant predictors of CKD documentation were eGFR, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, congestive heart failure, peripheral artery disease, statin use, age and gender. CKD documentation was lower among women than similarly affected men.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with an eGFR 10-59, documentation of CKD diagnosis by primary and subspecialty providers is low within a managed care patient cohort. Gender disparities in CKD documentation observed in the general population were also present among KPG CKD enrollees.

Management of heart failure: a brief review and selected update

Despite innovative medications and devices, heart failure (HF) continues to be the leading cause for admission to hospitals in the United States in patients older than 65 years. Many trials have succeeded in improving survival and many have failed. In this article, the authors briefly review the past, describe the present, and speculate about future HF trials.

Pharmacological left ventricular reverse remodeling in elderly patients receiving optimal therapy for chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In recent years, reversal of established left ventricular (LV) dilatation has been increasingly recognized in middle-aged patients with dilated cardiomyopathy receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or beta-blockers. We performed this prospective study to evaluate whether optimized therapy for heart failure also induces LV reverse remodeling in older patients.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-four patients aged >70 years with LV ejection fraction <40% underwent clinical and echocardiographic evaluation at baseline and after 1 year. During the early stage of follow-up, pharmacological therapy was optimized. LV reverse remodeling was defined as a reduction in LV end-diastolic volume >25% from baseline to final evaluation.

RESULTS

LV reverse remodeling was recognized in 32 patients (26%). Compared to the subjects who did not improve LV geometry, those with reverse remodeling had, at baseline, higher arterial blood pressure, lower serum creatinine levels, shorter duration of symptoms of heart failure, more frequently received beta-blocker therapy and had predominantly nonischemic aetiology. The variables associated with the development of reverse remodeling in the multivariate analysis were shorter duration of symptoms of heart failure (Odds ratio: 7.7; CI: 2.5-23.3, p=0.0001) and beta-blocker therapy (Odds ratio: 6.0; CI: 1.6-23.3, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

LV reverse remodeling takes place in elderly as well as in younger heart failure patients. A significant proportion of elderly patients undergoes this favourable process which occurs prevalently in patients receiving beta-blocker therapy with a short history of cardiac disease.

Endothelin receptor antagonists

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been developed to block the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in a variety of cardiovascular conditions. ET-1 is a powerful vasoconstrictor with mitogenic or co-mitogenic properties, which acts through the stimulation of 2 subtypes of receptors [endothelin receptor subtype A (ETA) and endothelin receptor subtype B (ETB) receptors]. Endogenous ET-1 is involved in a variety of conditions including systemic and pulmonary hypertension (PH), congestive heart failure (CHF), vascular remodeling (restenosis, atherosclerosis), renal failure, cancer, and cerebrovascular disease. The first dual ETA/ETB receptor blocker, bosentan, has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Trials of endothelin receptor antagonists in heart failure have been completed with mixed results so far. Studies are ongoing on the effects of selective ETA antagonists or dual ETA/ETB antagonists in lung fibrosis, cancer, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. While non-peptidic ET-1 receptor antagonists suitable for oral intake with excellent bioavailability have become available, proven efficacy is limited to pulmonary hypertension, but it is possible that these agents might find a place in the treatment of several cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases in the coming future.

Systematic review of multidisciplinary interventions in heart failure

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of multidisciplinary interventions on hospital admission and mortality in heart failure.

DESIGN

Systematic review. Thirteen databases were searched and reference lists from included trials and related reviews were checked. Trial authors were contacted if further information was required.

SETTING

Randomised controlled trials conducted in both hospital and community settings.

PATIENTS

Trials were included if all, or a defined subgroup of patients, had a diagnosis of heart failure.

INTERVENTIONS

Multidisciplinary interventions were defined as those in which heart failure management was the responsibility of a multidisciplinary team including medical input plus one or more of the following: specialist nurse, pharmacist, dietician, or social worker. Interventions were separated into four mutually exclusive groups: provision of home visits; home physiological monitoring or televideo link; telephone follow up but no home visits; and hospital or clinic interventions alone. Pharmaceutical and exercise based interventions were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All cause hospital admission, all cause mortality, and heart failure hospital admission.

RESULTS

74 trials were identified, of which 30 contained relevant data for inclusion in meta-analyses. Multidisciplinary interventions reduced all cause admission (relative risk (RR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 0.95, p = 0.002), although significant heterogeneity was found (p = 0.002). All cause mortality was also reduced (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.92, p = 0.002) as was heart failure admission (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.81, p < 0.001). These results varied little with sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary interventions for heart failure reduce both hospital admission and all cause mortality. The most effective interventions were delivered at least partly in the home.

Clinical service organisation for heart failure

BACKGROUND

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a serious, common condition associated with frequent hospitalisation. Several different disease management interventions (clinical service organisation interventions) for patients with CHF have been proposed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of disease management interventions for patients with CHF.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials (to June 2003); MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2003); EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2003); CINAHL (January 1982 to July 2003); AMED (January 1985 to July 2003); Science Citation Index Expanded (searched January 1981 to March 2001); SIGLE (January 1980 to July 2003); DARE (July 2003); National Research Register (July 2003); NHS Economic Evaluations Database (March 2001); reference lists of articles and asked experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing disease management interventions specifically directed at patients with CHF to usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two reviewers independently extracted data information and assessed study quality. Study authors were contacted for further information where necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials involving 1,627 people were included. We classified the interventions into three models: multidisciplinary interventions (a holistic approach bridging the gap between hospital admission and discharge home delivered by a team); case management interventions (intense monitoring of patients following discharge often involving telephone follow up and home visits); and clinic interventions (follow up in a CHF clinic). There was considerable overlap within these categories, however the components, intensity and duration of the interventions varied. Case management interventions tended to be associated with reduced all cause mortality but these findings were not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.10, P = 0.23), although the evidence was stronger when analysis was limited to the better quality studies (odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.98, P = 0.04). There was weak evidence that case management interventions may be associated with a reduction in admissions for heart failure. It is unclear what the effective components of the case management interventions are. The single RCT of a multidisciplinary intervention showed reduced heart-failure related re-admissions in the short term. At present there is little available evidence to support clinic based interventions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The data from this review are insufficient for forming recommendations. Further research should include adequately powered, multi-centre studies. Future studies should also investigate the effect of interventions on patients' and carers' quality of life, their satisfaction with the interventions and cost effectiveness.

Six minute corridor walk test as an outcome measure for the assessment of treatment in randomized, blinded intervention trials of chronic heart failure: a systematic review

AIMS

The 6 min walk test (6MWT) is commonly used in clinical trials to assess treatments for heart failure, but its ability to distinguish between effective and ineffective treatments is questionable. The aim of this study is to investigate, using a systematic literature review, the utility of the 6MWT as a measure of the effectiveness of treatment in randomized controlled trials of heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A literature search was performed using Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Biological abstracts for randomized controlled trials that measured 6MWT between 1988 and 31 May 2004. A significant increase in 6MWT distance was observed in only 9 of 47 randomized controlled trials of pharmacological therapy; 2 of 6 trials of ACE-inhibitors; 3 of 17 trials of beta-blockers; 1 of 4 trials of digoxin; one trial of ibopamine; one trial of l-arginine; one trial of beriberine; and one trial showed superiority of captopril over flosequinan. A significant increase in 6MWT was observed in four out of six placebo-controlled trials of cardiac resynchronization. Smaller pharmacological trials with fewer centres were more likely to be positive; six out of nine positive pharmacological trials had four or less participating centres, raising the possibility of publication bias. Pharmacological trials including patients with more severe heart failure were more likely to show a significant improvement with therapy than trials of milder heart failure. Five out of seven pharmacological trials that reported an improvement in symptoms also reported an improvement in 6MWT distance. Of 30 pharmacological trials, 29 that reported no improvement in symptoms also reported no improvement in 6MWT. Using mean values in these trials, the age of patients appeared a more important determinant of 6MWT distance than New York Heart Association classification.

CONCLUSION

The 6MWT has not yet been proven to be a robust test for the identification of effective pharmacological interventions although it appears useful for the assessment of cardiac resynchronization therapy. The results of the 6MWT were concordant with changes in symptoms, suggesting that it may be used as supportive evidence for symptom benefit. The test may be of greater value in patients with more advanced heart failure, where it may function as a maximal exercise test.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy and automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators in the treatment of heart failure: a review article

PURPOSE

To review the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators (AICDs) in heart failure (HF) patients.

DATA SOURCES

Selected scientific literature.

CONCLUSIONS

New developments in device therapy for HF patients are helping to decrease morbidity and mortality in this challenging patient population. CRT improves left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, quality of life, 6-min walk distances, and New York Heart Association scores in select patients. AICDs can prevent sudden cardiac death in those who have LV dysfunction and are at risk for ventricular arrhythmias. Cardiac devices are now becoming a standard of care for those with HF who meet certain criteria.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Despite advances in medical therapy for treating LV dysfunction, newly diagnosed patients face a 50% mortality rate in 5 years. The natural history of HF leads to continual deterioration of function unless adverse cardiac remodeling is reversed. Until recently, the only means for improving symptoms and cardiac function has been through the optimization of standard medicines that are indicated for LV dysfunction, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers. However, not all patients benefit from medical management alone. Cardiac devices may now be considered when significant symptoms persist after standard medicines are optimized. When practitioners use a multiple-modality approach, careful patient selection based on the inclusion criteria used in the trials outlined in this article will likely lead to improved management of those with LV dysfunction.

Comparison of treatment initiation with bisoprolol vs. enalapril in chronic heart failure patients: rationale and design of CIBIS-III

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers are standard therapy for chronic heart failure (CHF). beta-blockers are recommended to be initiated after ACE-inhibitors, but this order is not evidence based. The initiation order may be important since many, especially elderly CHF patients cannot tolerate target doses of both. Data suggest that beta-blockers may be more important to CHF patients than ACE-inhibitors, especially in early stages of CHF.

AIMS

To compare the effect on combined death or hospitalisation of initial monotherapy with either bisoprolol or enalapril, followed by combination therapy.

METHODS

One-thousand CHF patients without ACE-inhibitor, beta-blocker or angiotensin-receptor-blocker therapy will be randomised 1:1 to monotherapy with either enalapril or bisoprolol for 6 months, followed by combined therapy for 6-18 months. The primary objective is to show non-inferiority for bisoprolol-first vs. enalapril-first regarding combined death or hospitalisation. If that is shown, superiority for bisoprolol-first will be tested.

CONCLUSIONS

If the trial shows non-inferiority for bisoprolol-first vs. enalapril-first, the first CHF therapy may be chosen based on individual judgement in each patient. If bisoprolol-first is superior to enalapril-first, a beta-blocker should be given prior to an ACE-inhibitor in CHF, and the paradigm of testing CHF compounds against a background of ACE-inhibitor therapy will be challenged.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy—How big of a miracle?

This review examines the clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with severe heart failure symptoms and interventricular conduction delay. The magnitude of CRT effects on exercise duration, quality of life, and reversal of adverse remodeling are compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy and combined beta-blocker/ACE inhibitor therapy. Overall, CRT delivers substantial improvement in clinical well-being to an extent similar to or greater than what would be expected with neurohormonal intervention alone.

Increased exercise ejection fraction and reversed remodeling after long-term treatment with metoprolol in congestive heart failure: a randomized, stratified, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in mild to moderate heart failure due to ischemic or idiop

BACKGROUND

the effects of long-term administration of beta-blockers on left ventricular (LV) function during exercise in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) are controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

patients with stable congestive heart failure (CHF) (New York heart association [NYHA] class II and III) and ejection fraction (EF) < or =0.40 were randomized to metoprolol, 50 mg t.i.d. or placebo for 6 months. Patients were divided into two groups: ischemic heart disease (IHD) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The mean EF was 0.29 in both groups and 92% were taking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. In the IHD group, 84% had suffered a myocardial infarction (MI) and 64% had undergone revascularization at least 6 months before the study. LV volumes were measured by equilibrium radionuclide angiography. Mitral regurgitation was assessed by Doppler echocardiography. All values are changes for metoprolol subtracted by changes for placebo.

RESULTS

metoprolol improved LV function markedly both at rest and during sub-maximal exercise in both groups. The mean increase in EF was 0.069 at rest (P<0.001) and 0.078 during submaximal exercise (P<0.001). LV end-diastolic volume decreased by 22 ml at rest (P=0.006) and by 15 ml during exercise (P=0.006). LV end-systolic volume decreased by 23 ml both at rest (P=0.001) and during exercise (P=0.004). Exercise time increased by 39 s (P=0.08). In the metoprolol group, mitral regurgitation decreased (P=0.0026) and only one patient developed atrial fibrillation vs. eight in the placebo group (P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

metoprolol improves EF both at rest and during submaximal exercise and prevents LV dilatation in mild to moderate CHF due to IHD or DCM.

Clinical trials update from the American Heart Association meeting: PROSPER, DIAL, home care monitoring trials, immune modulation therapy, COMPANION and anaemia in heart failure

This article continues a series of reports on research developments of particular interest to those involved in the management of patients with heart failure. Summaries of the following trials, reported at the 75th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association held in Chicago, Illinois between 17th and 20th November 2002 are included: PROSPER; DIAL; home care monitoring trials; immune modulation therapy; COMPANION; and anaemia in heart failure.