Predictors of 14-day mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae strains: A mathematical PK/PD analysis

Acute kidney injury should not be neglected - optimization of quick Pitt bacteremia score for predicting mortality in critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Considering the therapeutic difficulties and mortality associated with bloodstream infection (BSI), it is essential to investigate other potential factors affecting mortality in critically ill patients with BSI and examine the utility of the quick Pitt bacteremia (qPitt) score to improve the survival rate.

Objectives

To improve the predictive accuracy of the qPitt scoring system by evaluating the five current components of qPitt and including other potential factors influencing mortality in critically ill patients with BSI.

Design

This was a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Medical information from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database was used in this retrospective cohort study. The risk factors associated with mortality were examined using a multivariate logistic regression model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the discriminatory capability of the prediction models.

Results

In total, 1240 eligible critically ill patients with BSI were included. After adjustment for age, community-onset BSI, indwelling invasive lines, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ⩽ 8, acute kidney injury (AKI) was identified as a notable risk factor for 14-day mortality. Except for altered mental status, the four other main components of the original qPitt were significantly associated with 14-day mortality. Hence, we established a modified qPitt (m-qPitt) by adding AKI and replacing altered mental status with GCS ⩽ 8. The AUCs for m-qPitt and qPitt were 0.723 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.683-0.759] and 0.708 (95% CI: 0.669-0.745) in predicting 14-day mortality, respectively. Moreover, m-qPitt also had acceptable performance and discrimination power [0.700 (95% CI: 0.666-0.732)] in predicting 28-day mortality.

Conclusion

AKI significantly influenced the survival of critically ill patients with BSIs. Compared with the original qPitt, our new m-qPitt was proven to have a better predictive performance for mortality in critically ill patients with BSI. Further studies should be conducted to validate the practicality of m-qPitt.

Clinical effectiveness of carbapenems versus alternative antibiotics for treating ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

The widespread administration of carbapenems to patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia (ESBL-B) has accelerated the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. This study aimed to systematically review recently published data to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of carbapenems, compared with other antibiotics, in the treatment of ESBL-B.

Methods

We searched the Ovid-Medline, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane Library and five Korean local databases until January 2016. We selected studies that reported overall mortality in patients with ESBL-B who had been treated with carbapenems and alternatives. Overall mortality was assessed as the primary outcome and sepsis-related mortality and adverse events were analysed as secondary outcomes.

Results

Thirty-five publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Regarding empirical therapy, there were no significant differences between the groups that received carbapenems and those that received non-carbapenems in relation to overall mortality. Regarding definitive therapy, overall mortality was lower for patients administered carbapenems compared with those administered non-carbapenems [risk ratio (RR) 0.78, 95% CI 0.61-0.98], non-β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (non-BL/BLI) (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.90) and cephalosporins (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.74). There were no differences between the carbapenems and the other antibiotics, namely BL/BLIs, quinolones and aminoglycosides.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis showed that BL/BLIs may be promising alternative antibiotics for definitive therapy in patients with ESBL-B. However, the lack of robust data derived from randomized controlled trials limits the conclusions and inferences from the pooled data.