1
|
Patterson SC, Pomeroy AE, Palmer AC. Ultrasensitive Response Explains the Benefit of Combination Chemotherapy Despite Drug Antagonism. Mol Cancer Ther 2024; 23:995-1009. [PMID: 38530117 PMCID: PMC11219261 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-23-0642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Most aggressive lymphomas are treated with combination chemotherapy, commonly as multiple cycles of concurrent drug administration. Concurrent administration is in theory optimal when combination therapies have synergistic (more than additive) drug interactions. We investigated pharmacodynamic interactions in the standard 4-drug "CHOP" regimen in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) cell lines and found that CHOP consistently exhibits antagonism and not synergy. We tested whether staggered treatment schedules could improve tumor cell kill by avoiding antagonism, using in vitro models of concurrent or staggered treatments. Surprisingly, we observed that tumor cell kill is maximized by concurrent drug administration despite antagonistic drug-drug interactions. We propose that an ultrasensitive dose response, as described in radiology by the linear-quadratic (LQ) model, can reconcile these seemingly contradictory experimental observations. The LQ model describes the relationship between cell survival and dose, and in radiology has identified scenarios favoring hypofractionated radiotherapy-the administration of fewer large doses rather than multiple smaller doses. Specifically, hypofractionated treatment can be favored when cells require an accumulation of DNA damage, rather than a "single hit," to die. By adapting the LQ model to combination chemotherapy and accounting for tumor heterogeneity, we find that tumor cell kill is maximized by concurrent administration of multiple drugs, even when chemotherapies have antagonistic interactions. Thus, our study identifies a new mechanism by which combination chemotherapy can be clinically beneficial that is not contingent on positive drug-drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C. Patterson
- Department of Pharmacology, Computational Medicine Program, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Amy E. Pomeroy
- Department of Pharmacology, Computational Medicine Program, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Adam C. Palmer
- Department of Pharmacology, Computational Medicine Program, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chiang CL, Chan KSK, Li H, Ng WT, Chow JCH, Choi HCW, Lam KO, Lee VHF, Ngan RKC, Lee AWM, Eschrich SA, Torres-Roca JF, Wong JWH. Using the genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD) to personalize the radiation dose in nasopharyngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 196:110287. [PMID: 38636709 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients undergoing radiotherapy are at risk of treatment failure, particularly locoregional recurrence. To optimize the individual radiation dose, we hypothesize that the genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD) can be used to correlate with locoregional control. METHODS A total of 92 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer / International Union Against Cancer stage III to stage IVB recruited in a randomized phase III trial were assessed (NPC-0501) (NCT00379262). Patients were treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy plus (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is locoregional failure free rate (LRFFR). RESULTS Despite the homogenous physical radiation dose prescribed (Median: 70 Gy, range 66-76 Gy), there was a wide range of GARD values (median: 50.7, range 31.1-67.8) in this cohort. In multivariable analysis, a GARD threshold (GARDT) of 45 was independently associated with LRFFR (p = 0.008). By evaluating the physical dose required to achieve the GARDT (RxRSI), three distinct clinical subgroups were identified: (1) radiosensitive tumors that RxRSI at dose < 66 Gy (N = 59, 64.1 %) (b) moderately radiosensitive tumors that RxRSI dose within the current standard of care range (66-74 Gy) (N = 20, 21.7 %), (c) radioresistant tumors that need a significant dose escalation above the current standard of care (>74 Gy) (N = 13, 14.1 %). CONCLUSION GARD is independently associated with locoregional control in radiotherapy-treated NPC patients from a Phase 3 clinical trial. GARD may be a potential framework to personalize radiotherapy dose for NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Leung Chiang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, China.
| | - Kenneth Sik Kwan Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, China
| | - Huaping Li
- School of Biomedical Sciences, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Horace Cheuk Wai Choi
- School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ka On Lam
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, China
| | - Victor Ho Fun Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, China
| | - Roger Kai Cheong Ngan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, China
| | - Anne Wing Mui Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, and University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | | | | | - Jason Wing Hon Wong
- School of Biomedical Sciences, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carsuzaa F, Chabrillac E, Marcy PY, Mehanna H, Thariat J. Advances and residual knowledge gaps in the neck management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with advanced nodal disease undergoing definitive (chemo)radiotherapy for their primary. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:553-567. [PMID: 38600366 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02228-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Substantial changes have been made in the neck management of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) in the past century. These have been fostered by changes in cancer epidemiology and technological progress in imaging, surgery, or radiotherapy, as well as disruptive concepts in oncology. We aimed to review changes in nodal management, with a focus on HNSCC patients with nodal involvement (cN+) undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy. METHODS A narrative review was conducted to review current advances and address knowledge gaps in the multidisciplinary management of the cN+ neck in the context of (chemo)radiotherapy. RESULTS Metastatic neck nodes are associated with poorer prognosis and poorer response to radiotherapy, and have therefore been systematically treated by surgery. Radical neck dissection (ND) has gradually evolved toward more personalized and less morbid approaches, i.e., from functional to selective ND. Omission of ND has been made feasible by use of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to monitor the radiation response in cN+ patients. Human papillomavirus-driven oropharyngeal cancers and their cystic nodes have shown dramatically better prognosis than tobacco-related cancers, justifying a specific prognostic classification (AJCC) creation. Finally, considering the role of lymph nodes in anti-tumor immunity, de-escalation of ND and prophylactic nodal irradiation in combination are intense areas of investigation. However, the management of bulky cN3 disease remains an issue, as aggressive multidisciplinary strategies or innovative combined treatments have not yet significantly improved their prognosis. CONCLUSION Personalized neck management is an increasingly important aspect of the overall therapeutic strategies in cN+ HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florent Carsuzaa
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Emilien Chabrillac
- Department of Surgery, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Yves Marcy
- Department of Radiology, Clinique du Cap d'Or, La Seyne-sur-mer, France
| | - Hisham Mehanna
- Institute for Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Department of radiotherapy, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
- Laboratoire de physique Corpusculaire, IN2P3/ENSICAEN/CNRS, UMR 6534, Normandie Université, Caen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Leeuw ALMP, Giralt J, Tao Y, Benavente S, France Nguyen TV, Hoebers FJP, Hoeben A, Terhaard CHJ, Wai Lee L, Friesland S, Steenbakkers RJHM, Tans L, Heukelom J, Kayembe MT, van Kranen SR, Bartelink H, Rasch CRN, Sonke JJ, Hamming-Vrieze O. A multicentric randomized controlled phase III trial of adaptive and 18F-FDG-PET-guided dose-redistribution in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ARTFORCE). Radiother Oncol 2024; 196:110281. [PMID: 38636708 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This multicenter randomized phase III trial evaluated whether locoregional control of patients with LAHNSCC could be improved by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-guided dose-escalation while minimizing the risk of increasing toxicity using a dose-redistribution and scheduled adaptation strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with T3-4-N0-3-M0 LAHNSCC were randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive a dose distribution ranging from 64-84 Gy/35 fractions with adaptation at the 10thfraction (rRT) or conventional 70 Gy/35 fractions (cRT). Both arms received concurrent three-cycle 100 mg/m2cisplatin. Primary endpoints were 2-year locoregional control (LRC) and toxicity. Primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS Due to slow accrual, the study was prematurely closed (at 84 %) after randomizing 221 eligible patients between 2012 and 2019 to receive rRT (N = 109) or cRT (N = 112). The 2-year LRC estimate difference of 81 % (95 %CI 74-89 %) vs. 74 % (66-83 %) in the rRT and cRT arm, respectively, was not found statistically significant (HR 0.75, 95 %CI 0.43-1.31,P=.31). Toxicity prevalence and incidence rates were similar between trial arms, with exception for a significant increased grade ≥ 3 pharyngolaryngeal stenoses incidence rate in the rRT arm (0 versus 4 %,P=.05). In post-hoc subgroup analyses, rRT improved LRC for patients with N0-1 disease (HR 0.21, 95 %CI 0.05-0.93) and oropharyngeal cancer (0.31, 0.10-0.95), regardless of HPV. CONCLUSION Adaptive and dose redistributed radiotherapy enabled dose-escalation with similar toxicity rates compared to conventional radiotherapy. While FDG-PET-guided dose-escalation did overall not lead to significant tumor control or survival improvements, post-hoc results showed improved locoregional control for patients with N0-1 disease or oropharyngeal cancer treated with rRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Liza M P de Leeuw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jordi Giralt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital General Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yungan Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Sergi Benavente
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital General Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Frank J P Hoebers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ann Hoeben
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H J Terhaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lip Wai Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Signe Friesland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Roel J H M Steenbakkers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa Tans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jolien Heukelom
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mutamba T Kayembe
- Department of Bioinformatics and Statistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon R van Kranen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry Bartelink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Coen R N Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Hamming-Vrieze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yadav S, Jiang F, Kurkowska S, Saelee R, Morley A, Feng F, Aggarwal R, Lawhn-Heath C, Uribe C, Hope TA. Assessing Response to PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapies with Single SPECT Imaging at 24 Hours After Injection. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1064-1069. [PMID: 38724282 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between lesion-absorbed dose and tumor response in 177Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) remains complex. We aimed to investigate whether baseline lesion-absorbed dose can predict lesion-based responses and to explore the connection between lesion-absorbed dose and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 50 patients with 335 index lesions undergoing 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT, who had dosimetry analysis performed on SPECT/CT at 24 h after cycles 1 and 2. First, we identified the index lesions for each patient and measured the lesion-based absorbed doses. Lesion-based response was calculated after cycle 2. Additionally, PSA50 response (a decline of 50% from baseline PSA) after cycle 2 was also calculated. The respective responses for mean and maximum absorbed doses and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) volumetric intensity product (VIP-PSMA) at cycles 1 and 2 were termed SPECTmean, SPECTmaximum, and SPECTVIP-PSMA, respectively. Results: Of the 50 patients reviewed, 46% achieved a PSA50 response after cycle 2. Of the 335 index lesions, 58% were osseous, 32% were lymph nodes, and 10% were soft-tissue metastatic lesions. The SPECT lesion-based responses were higher in PSA responders than in nonresponders (SPECTmean response of 46.8% ± 26.1% vs. 26.2% ± 24.5%, P = 0.007; SPECTmaximum response of 45% ± 25.1% vs. 19% ± 27.0%, P = 0.001; SPECTVIP-PSMA response of 49.2% ± 30.3% vs. 14% ± 34.7%, P = 0.0005). An association was observed between PSA response and SPECTVIP-PSMA response (R 2 = 0.40 and P < 0.0001). A limited relationship was found between baseline absorbed dose measured with a 24-h single time point and SPECT lesion-based response (R 2 = 0.05, P = 0.001, and R 2 = 0.03, P = 0.007, for mean and maximum absorbed doses, respectively). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, quantitative lesion-based response correlated with patient-level PSA response. We observed a limited relationship between baseline absorbed dose and lesion-based responses. Most of the variance in response remains unexplained solely by baseline absorbed dose. Establishment of a dose-response relationship in RPT with a single time point at 24 h presented some limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surekha Yadav
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Fei Jiang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sara Kurkowska
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Rachelle Saelee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Amanda Morley
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Felix Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Courtney Lawhn-Heath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Carlos Uribe
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
- Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California; and
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu Y, Yi M, Niu M, Zhou B, Mei Q, Wu K. Beyond success: unveiling the hidden potential of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in solid tumors. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2024; 44:739-760. [PMID: 38837878 PMCID: PMC11260771 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors, has significantly transformed cancer treatment. Despite its success, many patients struggle to respond adequately or sustain long-lasting clinical improvement. A growing consensus has emerged that radiotherapy (RT) enhances the response rate and overall efficacy of immunotherapy. Although combining RT and immunotherapy has been extensively investigated in preclinical models and has shown promising results, establishing itself as a dynamic and thriving area of research, clinical evidence for this combination strategy over the past five years has shown both positive and disappointing results, suggesting the need for a more nuanced understanding. This review provides a balanced and updated analysis of the combination of immunotherapy and RT. We summarized the preclinical mechanisms through which RT boosts antitumor immune responses and mainly focused on the outcomes of recently updated clinical trials, including those that may not have met expectations. We investigated the optimization of the therapeutic potential of this combined strategy, including key challenges, such as fractionation and scheduling, lymph node irradiation, and toxicity. Finally, we offered insights into the prospects and challenges associated with the clinical translation of this combination therapy, providing a realistic perspective on the current state of research and potential future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuze Wu
- Department of OncologyTongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| | - Ming Yi
- Department of Breast SurgeryZhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated HospitalHangzhouZhejiangP. R. China
| | - Mengke Niu
- Department of OncologyTongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| | - Binghan Zhou
- Department of OncologyTongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| | - Qi Mei
- Department of OncologyTongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| | - Kongming Wu
- Cancer CenterShanxi Bethune HospitalShanxi Academy of Medical Science, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanShanxiP. R. China
- Cancer CenterTongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu F, Farris MK, Ververs JD, Hughes RT, Munley MT. Histology-driven hypofractionated radiation therapy schemes for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110257. [PMID: 38548113 PMCID: PMC11098686 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Histology was found to be an important prognostic factor for local tumor control probability (TCP) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A histology-driven SBRT approach has not been explored in routine clinical practice and histology-dependent fractionation schemes remain unknown. Here, we analyzed pooled histologic TCP data as a function of biologically effective dose (BED) to determine histology-driven fractionation schemes for SBRT and hypofractionated radiotherapy of two predominant early-stage NSCLC histologic subtypes adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS The least-χ2 method was used to fit the collected histologic TCP data of 8510 early-stage NSCLC patients to determine parameters for a well-developed radiobiological model per the Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) initiative. RESULTS A fit to the histologic TCP data yielded independent radiobiological parameter sets for radiotherapy of early-stage lung ADC and SCC. TCP increases steeply with BED and reaches an asymptotic maximal plateau, allowing us to determine model-independent optimal fractionation schemes of least doses in 1-30 fractions to achieve maximal tumor control for early-stage lung ADC and SCC, e.g., 30, 44, 48, and 51 Gy for ADC, and 32, 48, 54, and 58 Gy for SCC in 1, 3, 4, and 5 fractions, respectively. CONCLUSION We presented the first determination of histology-dependent radiobiological parameters and model-independent histology-driven optimal SBRT and hypofractionated radiation therapy schemes for early-stage lung ADC and SCC. SCC requires substantially higher radiation doses to maximize tumor control than ADC, plausibly attributed to tumor genetic diversity and microenvironment. The determined optimal SBRT schemes agree well with clinical practice for early-stage lung ADC. These proposed optimal fractionation schemes provide first insights for histology-based personalized radiotherapy of two predominant early-stage NSCLC subtypes ADC and SCC, which require further validation with large-scale histologic TCP data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| | - Michael K Farris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - James D Ververs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Ryan T Hughes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Michael T Munley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hodson D, Mistry H, Yates J, Guzzetti S, Davies M, Aarons L, Ogungbenro K. Hierarchical cluster analysis and nonlinear mixed-effects modelling for candidate biomarker detection in preclinical models of cancer. Eur J Pharm Sci 2024; 197:106774. [PMID: 38641123 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preclinical models of cancer can be of translational benefit when assessing how different biomarkers are regulated in response to particular treatments. Detection of molecular biomarkers in preclinical models of cancer is difficult due inter-animal variability in responses, combined with limited accessibility of longitudinal data. METHODS Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NLME) was used to analyse tumour growth data based on expected tumour growth rates observed 7 days after initial doses (DD7) of Radiotherapy (RT) and Combination of RT with DNA Damage Response Inhibitors (DDRi). Cox regression was performed to confirm an association between DD7 and survival. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) was then used to identify candidate biomarkers impacting responses to RT and RT/DDRi and these were validated using NLME. RESULTS Cox regression confirmed significant associations between DD7 and survival. HCA of RT treated samples, combined with NLME confirmed significant associations between DD7 and Cluster specific CD8+ Ki67 MFI, as well as DD7 and cluster specific Natural Killer cell density in RT treated mice. CONCLUSION Application of NLME, as well as HCA of candidate biomarkers may provide additional avenues to assess the effect of RT in MC38 syngeneic tumour models. Additional studies would need to be conducted to confirm association between DD7 and biomarkers in RT/DDRi treated mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hodson
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Hitesh Mistry
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - James Yates
- DMPK, Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sofia Guzzetti
- DMPK, Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael Davies
- DMPK, Research and Early Development, Neuroscience R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Leon Aarons
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Kayode Ogungbenro
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hall WA, Mathison AJ, DeVoe E, Tschannen M, Wendt-Andrae J, Straza M, Awan M, Puckett LL, Lawton CAF, Schultz C, Urrutia R, Kerns S, Torres-Roca JF, Li XA, Erickson B, Nevalainen MT, Zimmermann MT, Paulson E. Changes in Daily Apparent Diffusion Coefficient on Fully Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlate With Established Genomic Pathways of Radiation Sensitivity and Reveal Novel Biologic Associations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00468-1. [PMID: 38819340 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Changes in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) are frequently observed during chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT). It is hypothesized that qMRI features are reflective of underlying tissue responses. It's unknown what underlying genomic characteristics underly qMRI changes. We hypothesized that qMRI changes may correlate with DNA damage response (DDR) capacity within human tumors. Therefore, we designed the current study to correlate qMRI changes from daily RT treatment with underlying tumor transcriptomic profiles. METHODS AND MATERIALS Study participants were prospectively enrolled (National Clinical Trial 03500081). RNA expression levels for 757 genes from pretreatment biopsies were obtained using a custom panel that included signatures of radiation sensitivity and DDR. Daily qMRI data were obtained from a 1.5 Tesla MR linear accelerator. Using these images, d-slow, d-star, perfusion, and apparent diffusion coefficient-mean values in tumors were plotted per-fraction, over time, and associated with genomic pathways. RESULTS A total of 1022 qMRIs were obtained from 39 patients and both genomic data and qMRI data from 27 total patients. For 20 of those patients, we also generated normal tissue transcriptomic data. Radio sensitivity index values most closely associated with tissue of origin. Multiple genomic pathways including DNA repair, peroxisome, late estrogen receptor responses, KRAS signaling, and UV response were significantly associated with qMRI feature changes (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Genomic pathway associations across metabolic, RT sensitivity, and DDR pathways indicate common tumor biology that may correlate with qMRI changes during a course of treatment. Such data provide hypothesis-generating novel mechanistic insight into the biologic meaning of qMRI changes during treatment and enable optimal selection of imaging biomarkers for biologically MR-guided RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
| | - Angela J Mathison
- Linda T. and John A. Mellowes Center for Genomic Sciences and Precision Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Department of Surgery, Division of Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Elias DeVoe
- Linda T. and John A. Mellowes Center for Genomic Sciences and Precision Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Michael Tschannen
- Linda T. and John A. Mellowes Center for Genomic Sciences and Precision Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Jaime Wendt-Andrae
- Linda T. and John A. Mellowes Center for Genomic Sciences and Precision Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Michael Straza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Musaddiq Awan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Lindsay L Puckett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Colleen A F Lawton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Christopher Schultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Raul Urrutia
- Linda T. and John A. Mellowes Center for Genomic Sciences and Precision Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Department of Surgery, Division of Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Sarah Kerns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Javier F Torres-Roca
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Beth Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Marja T Nevalainen
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Michael T Zimmermann
- Linda T. and John A. Mellowes Center for Genomic Sciences and Precision Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Eric Paulson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith TAD. Gene Abnormalities and Modulated Gene Expression Associated with Radionuclide Treatment: Towards Predictive Biomarkers of Response. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15:688. [PMID: 38927624 PMCID: PMC11202453 DOI: 10.3390/genes15060688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Molecular radiotherapy (MRT), also known as radioimmunotherapy or targeted radiotherapy, is the delivery of radionuclides to tumours by targeting receptors overexpressed on the cancer cell. Currently it is used in the treatment of a few cancer types including lymphoma, neuroendocrine, and prostate cancer. Recently reported outcomes demonstrating improvements in patient survival have led to an upsurge in interest in MRT particularly for the treatment of prostate cancer. Unfortunately, between 30% and 40% of patients do not respond. Further normal tissue exposure, especially kidney and salivary gland due to receptor expression, result in toxicity, including dry mouth. Predictive biomarkers to select patients who will benefit from MRT are crucial. Whilst pre-treatment imaging with imaging versions of the therapeutic agents is useful in demonstrating tumour binding and potentially organ toxicity, they do not necessarily predict patient benefit, which is dependent on tumour radiosensitivity. Transcript-based biomarkers have proven useful in tailoring external beam radiotherapy and adjuvant treatment. However, few studies have attempted to derive signatures for MRT response prediction. Here, transcriptomic studies that have identified genes associated with clinical radionuclide exposure have been reviewed. These studies will provide potential features for seeding multi-component biomarkers of MRT response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim A D Smith
- Nuclear Futures Institute, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangor University, Dean Street, Bangor LL57 1UT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bleaney CW, Abdelaal H, Reardon M, Anandadas C, Hoskin P, Choudhury A, Forker L. Clinical Biomarkers of Tumour Radiosensitivity and Predicting Benefit from Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1942. [PMID: 38792019 PMCID: PMC11119069 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Modern advanced radiotherapy techniques have improved the precision and accuracy of radiotherapy delivery, with resulting plans being highly personalised based on individual anatomy. Adaptation for individual tumour biology remains elusive. There is an unmet need for biomarkers of intrinsic radiosensitivity that can predict tumour response to radiation to facilitate individualised decision-making, dosing and treatment planning. Over the last few decades, the use of high throughput molecular biology technologies has led to an explosion of newly discovered cancer biomarkers. Gene expression signatures are now used routinely in clinic to aid decision-making regarding adjuvant systemic therapy. They have great potential as radiotherapy biomarkers. A previous systematic review published in 2015 reported only five studies of signatures evaluated for their ability to predict radiotherapy benefits in clinical cohorts. This updated systematic review encompasses the expanded number of studies reported in the last decade. An additional 27 studies were identified. In total, 22 distinct signatures were recognised (5 pre-2015, 17 post-2015). Seventeen signatures were 'radiosensitivity' signatures and five were breast cancer prognostic signatures aiming to identify patients at an increased risk of local recurrence and therefore were more likely to benefit from adjuvant radiation. Most signatures (15/22) had not progressed beyond the discovery phase of development, with no suitable validated clinical-grade assay for application. Very few signatures (4/17 'radiosensitivity' signatures) had undergone any laboratory-based biological validation of their ability to predict tumour radiosensitivity. No signatures have been assessed prospectively in a phase III biomarker-led trial to date and none are recommended for routine use in clinical guidelines. A phase III prospective evaluation is ongoing for two breast cancer prognostic signatures. The most promising radiosensitivity signature remains the radiosensitivity index (RSI), which is used to calculate a genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD). There is an ongoing phase II prospective biomarker-led study of RSI/GARD in triple negative breast cancer. The results of these trials are eagerly anticipated over the coming years. Future work in this area should focus on (1) robust biological validation; (2) building biobanks alongside large radiotherapy randomised controlled trials with dose variance (to demonstrate an interaction between radiosensitivity signature and dose); (3) a validation of clinical-grade cost-effective assays that are deliverable within current healthcare infrastructure; and (4) an integration with biomarkers of other determinants of radiation response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W. Bleaney
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The Oglesby Cancer Research Building, The University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK (L.F.)
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Hebatalla Abdelaal
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Mark Reardon
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The Oglesby Cancer Research Building, The University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK (L.F.)
| | - Carmel Anandadas
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The Oglesby Cancer Research Building, The University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK (L.F.)
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The Oglesby Cancer Research Building, The University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK (L.F.)
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Laura Forker
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The Oglesby Cancer Research Building, The University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK (L.F.)
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Niraula D, Cuneo KC, Dinov ID, Gonzalez BD, Jamaluddin JB, Jin JJ, Luo Y, Matuszak MM, Ten Haken RK, Bryant AK, Dilling TJ, Dykstra MP, Frakes JM, Liveringhouse CL, Miller SR, Mills MN, Palm RF, Regan SN, Rishi A, Torres-Roca JF, Yu HHM, El Naqa I. Intricacies of Human-AI Interaction in Dynamic Decision-Making for Precision Oncology: A Case Study in Response-Adaptive Radiotherapy. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.04.27.24306434. [PMID: 38746238 PMCID: PMC11092730 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.27.24306434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Background Adaptive treatment strategies that can dynamically react to individual cancer progression can provide effective personalized care. Longitudinal multi-omics information, paired with an artificially intelligent clinical decision support system (AI-CDSS) can assist clinicians in determining optimal therapeutic options and treatment adaptations. However, AI-CDSS is not perfectly accurate, as such, clinicians' over/under reliance on AI may lead to unintended consequences, ultimately failing to develop optimal strategies. To investigate such collaborative decision-making process, we conducted a Human-AI interaction case study on response-adaptive radiotherapy (RT). Methods We designed and conducted a two-phase study for two disease sites and two treatment modalities-adaptive RT for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and adaptive stereotactic body RT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-in which clinicians were asked to consider mid-treatment modification of the dose per fraction for a number of retrospective cancer patients without AI-support (Unassisted Phase) and with AI-assistance (AI-assisted Phase). The AI-CDSS graphically presented trade-offs in tumor control and the likelihood of toxicity to organs at risk, provided an optimal recommendation, and associated model uncertainties. In addition, we asked for clinicians' decision confidence level and trust level in individual AI recommendations and encouraged them to provide written remarks. We enrolled 13 evaluators (radiation oncology physicians and residents) from two medical institutions located in two different states, out of which, 4 evaluators volunteered in both NSCLC and HCC studies, resulting in a total of 17 completed evaluations (9 NSCLC, and 8 HCC). To limit the evaluation time to under an hour, we selected 8 treated patients for NSCLC and 9 for HCC, resulting in a total of 144 sets of evaluations (72 from NSCLC and 72 from HCC). Evaluation for each patient consisted of 8 required inputs and 2 optional remarks, resulting in up to a total of 1440 data points. Results AI-assistance did not homogeneously influence all experts and clinical decisions. From NSCLC cohort, 41 (57%) decisions and from HCC cohort, 34 (47%) decisions were adjusted after AI assistance. Two evaluations (12%) from the NSCLC cohort had zero decision adjustments, while the remaining 15 (88%) evaluations resulted in at least two decision adjustments. Decision adjustment level positively correlated with dissimilarity in decision-making with AI [NSCLC: ρ = 0.53 ( p < 0.001); HCC: ρ = 0.60 ( p < 0.001)] indicating that evaluators adjusted their decision closer towards AI recommendation. Agreement with AI-recommendation positively correlated with AI Trust Level [NSCLC: ρ = 0.59 ( p < 0.001); HCC: ρ = 0.7 ( p < 0.001)] indicating that evaluators followed AI's recommendation if they agreed with that recommendation. The correlation between decision confidence changes and decision adjustment level showed an opposite trend [NSCLC: ρ = -0.24 ( p = 0.045), HCC: ρ = 0.28 ( p = 0.017)] reflecting the difference in behavior due to underlying differences in disease type and treatment modality. Decision confidence positively correlated with the closeness of decisions to the standard of care (NSCLC: 2 Gy/fx; HCC: 10 Gy/fx) indicating that evaluators were generally more confident in prescribing dose fractionations more similar to those used in standard clinical practice. Inter-evaluator agreement increased with AI-assistance indicating that AI-assistance can decrease inter-physician variability. The majority of decisions were adjusted to achieve higher tumor control in NSCLC and lower normal tissue complications in HCC. Analysis of evaluators' remarks indicated concerns for organs at risk and RT outcome estimates as important decision-making factors. Conclusions Human-AI interaction depends on the complex interrelationship between expert's prior knowledge and preferences, patient's state, disease site, treatment modality, model transparency, and AI's learned behavior and biases. The collaborative decision-making process can be summarized as follows: (i) some clinicians may not believe in an AI system, completely disregarding its recommendation, (ii) some clinicians may believe in the AI system but will critically analyze its recommendations on a case-by-case basis; (iii) when a clinician finds that the AI recommendation indicates the possibility for better outcomes they will adjust their decisions accordingly; and (iv) When a clinician finds that the AI recommendation indicate a worse possible outcome they will disregard it and seek their own alternative approach.
Collapse
|
13
|
Naghavi AO, Bryant JM, Kim Y, Weygand J, Redler G, Sim AJ, Miller J, Coucoules K, Michael LT, Gloria WE, Yang G, Rosenberg SA, Ahmed K, Bui MM, Henderson-Jackson EB, Lee A, Lee CD, Gonzalez RJ, Feygelman V, Eschrich SA, Scott JG, Torres-Roca J, Latifi K, Parikh N, Costello J. Habitat escalated adaptive therapy (HEAT): a phase 2 trial utilizing radiomic habitat-directed and genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) optimization for high-grade soft tissue sarcoma. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:437. [PMID: 38594603 PMCID: PMC11003059 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12151-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), have significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, with poor response to standard neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Achieving a favorable pathologic response (FPR ≥ 95%) from RT is associated with improved patient outcome. Genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD), a radiation-specific metric that quantifies the expected RT treatment effect as a function of tumor dose and genomics, proposed that STS is significantly underdosed. STS have significant radiomic heterogeneity, where radiomic habitats can delineate regions of intra-tumoral hypoxia and radioresistance. We designed a novel clinical trial, Habitat Escalated Adaptive Therapy (HEAT), utilizing radiomic habitats to identify areas of radioresistance within the tumor and targeting them with GARD-optimized doses, to improve FPR in high-grade STS. METHODS Phase 2 non-randomized single-arm clinical trial includes non-metastatic, resectable high-grade STS patients. Pre-treatment multiparametric MRIs (mpMRI) delineate three distinct intra-tumoral habitats based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) sequences. GARD estimates that simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) doses of 70 and 60 Gy in 25 fractions to the highest and intermediate radioresistant habitats, while the remaining volume receives standard 50 Gy, would lead to a > 3 fold FPR increase to 24%. Pre-treatment CT guided biopsies of each habitat along with clip placement will be performed for pathologic evaluation, future genomic studies, and response assessment. An mpMRI taken between weeks two and three of treatment will be used for biological plan adaptation to account for tumor response, in addition to an mpMRI after the completion of radiotherapy in addition to pathologic response, toxicity, radiomic response, disease control, and survival will be evaluated as secondary endpoints. Furthermore, liquid biopsy will be performed with mpMRI for future ancillary studies. DISCUSSION This is the first clinical trial to test a novel genomic-based RT dose optimization (GARD) and to utilize radiomic habitats to identify and target radioresistance regions, as a strategy to improve the outcome of RT-treated STS patients. Its success could usher in a new phase in radiation oncology, integrating genomic and radiomic insights into clinical practice and trial designs, and may reveal new radiomic and genomic biomarkers, refining personalized treatment strategies for STS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05301283. TRIAL STATUS The trial started recruitment on March 17, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - J M Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Youngchul Kim
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joseph Weygand
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Gage Redler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Austin J Sim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Justin Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Coucoules
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Lauren Taylor Michael
- Clinical Trials Office, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Warren E Gloria
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - George Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Stephen A Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kamran Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Andrew Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Caitlin D Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ricardo J Gonzalez
- Department of Sarcoma, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vladimir Feygelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Steven A Eschrich
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jacob G Scott
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Radiation Oncology Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Javier Torres-Roca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nainesh Parikh
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James Costello
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wiltink LM, Miah AB, Scholten AN, Haas RL. Unraveling the Myth of Radiation Resistance in Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:172-179. [PMID: 38508782 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
There is a misconception that sarcomas are resistant to radiotherapy. This manuscript summarizes available (pre-) clinical data on the radiosensitivity of soft tissue sarcomas. Currently, clinical practice guidelines suggest irradiating sarcomas in 1.8-2 Gy once daily fractions. Careful observation of myxoid liposarcomas patients during preoperative radiotherapy led to the discovery of this subtype's remarkable radiosensitivity. It resulted subsequently in an international prospective clinical trial demonstrating the safety of a reduced total dose, yet still delivered with conventional 1.8-2 Gy fractions. In several areas of oncology, especially for tumors of epithelial origin where radiotherapy plays a curative role, the concurrent application of systemic compounds aiming for radiosensitization has been incorporated into routine clinical practice. This approach has also been investigated in sarcomas and is summarized in this manuscript. Observing relatively low α/β ratios after preclinical cellular investigations, investigators have explored hypofractionation with daily doses ranging from 2.85-8.0 Gy per day in prospective clinical studies, and the data are presented. Finally, we summarize work with mouse models and genomic investigations to predict observed responses to radiotherapy in sarcoma patients. Taken together, these data indicate that sarcomas are not resistant to radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Wiltink
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - A B Miah
- Department of Radiotherapy and Physics, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - A N Scholten
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - R L Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alterio D, Vincini MG, Volpe S, Bergamaschi L, Zaffaroni M, Gandini S, Peruzzotti G, Cattani F, Garibaldi C, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Orecchia R. A multicenter high-quality data registry for advanced proton therapy approaches: the POWER registry. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:333. [PMID: 38475762 PMCID: PMC10935828 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12059-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paucity and low evidence-level data on proton therapy (PT) represent one of the main issues for the establishment of solid indications in the PT setting. Aim of the present registry, the POWER registry, is to provide a tool for systematic, prospective, harmonized, and multidimensional high-quality data collection to promote knowledge in the field of PT with a particular focus on the use of hypofractionation. METHODS All patients with any type of oncologic disease (benign and malignant disease) eligible for PT at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy, will be included in the present registry. Three levels of data collection will be implemented: Level (1) clinical research (patients outcome and toxicity, quality of life, and cost/effectiveness analysis); Level (2) radiological and radiobiological research (radiomic and dosiomic analysis, as well as biological modeling); Level (3) biological and translational research (biological biomarkers and genomic data analysis). Endpoints and outcome measures of hypofractionation schedules will be evaluated in terms of either Treatment Efficacy (tumor response rate, time to progression/percentages of survivors/median survival, clinical, biological, and radiological biomarkers changes, identified as surrogate endpoints of cancer survival/response to treatment) and Toxicity. The study protocol has been approved by the IEO Ethical Committee (IEO 1885). Other than patients treated at IEO, additional PT facilities (equipped with Proteus®ONE or Proteus®PLUS technologies by IBA, Ion Beam Applications, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) are planned to join the registry data collection. Moreover, the registry will be also fully integrated into international PT data collection networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Peruzzotti
- Clinical Trial Office, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Garibaldi
- Unit of Radiation Research, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smith TAD, West CML, Joseph N, Lane B, Irlam-Jones J, More E, Mistry H, Reeves KJ, Song YP, Reardon M, Hoskin PJ, Hussain SA, Denley H, Hall E, Porta N, Huddart RA, James ND, Choudhury A. A hypoxia biomarker does not predict benefit from giving chemotherapy with radiotherapy in the BC2001 randomised controlled trial. EBioMedicine 2024; 101:105032. [PMID: 38387404 PMCID: PMC10897900 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND BC2001 showed combining chemotherapy (5-FU + mitomycin-C) with radiotherapy improves loco-regional disease-free survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We previously showed a 24-gene hypoxia-associated signature predicted benefit from hypoxia-modifying radiosensitisation in BCON and hypothesised that only patients with low hypoxia scores (HSs) would benefit from chemotherapy in BC2001. BC2001 allowed conventional (64Gy/32 fractions) or hypofractionated (55Gy/20 fractions) radiotherapy. An exploratory analysis tested an additional hypothesis that hypofractionation reduces reoxygenation and would be detrimental for patients with hypoxic tumours. METHODS RNA was extracted from pre-treatment biopsies (298 BC2001 patients), transcriptomic data generated (Affymetrix Clariom-S arrays), HSs calculated (median expression of 24-signature genes) and patients stratified as hypoxia-high or -low (cut-off: cohort median). PRIMARY ENDPOINT invasive loco-regional control (ILRC); secondary overall survival. FINDINGS Hypoxia affected overall survival (HR = 1.30; 95% CI 0.99-1.70; p = 0.062): more uncertainty for ILRC (HR = 1.29; 95% CI 0.82-2.03; p = 0.264). Benefit from chemotherapy was similar for patients with high or low HSs, with no interaction between HS and treatment arm. High HS associated with poor ILRC following hypofractionated (n = 90, HR 1.69; 95% CI 0.99-2.89 p = 0.057) but not conventional (n = 207, HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.28-1.80, p = 0.461) radiotherapy. The finding was confirmed in an independent cohort (BCON) where hypoxia associated with a poor prognosis for patients receiving hypofractionated (n = 51; HR 14.2; 95% CI 1.7-119; p = 0.015) but not conventional (n = 24, HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.07-15.5, p = 0.978) radiotherapy. INTERPRETATION Tumour hypoxia status does not affect benefit from BC2001 chemotherapy. Hypoxia appears to affect fractionation sensitivity. Use of HSs to personalise treatment needs testing in a biomarker-stratified trial. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, NIHR, MRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim A D Smith
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Nuclear Futures Institute, School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Catharine M L West
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Nuradh Joseph
- Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Maharagama, Sri Lanka
| | - Brian Lane
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Joely Irlam-Jones
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elisabet More
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Hitesh Mistry
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kimberley J Reeves
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Yee Pei Song
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Reardon
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter J Hoskin
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, London, UK
| | - Syed A Hussain
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen Denley
- Pathology Centre, Shrewsbury and Telford NHS Trust, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - Emma Hall
- Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit, London, UK
| | - Nuria Porta
- Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit, London, UK
| | - Robert A Huddart
- Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Department of Oncology, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, England, UK
| | - Nick D James
- Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Department of Oncology, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, England, UK
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tam A, Li YR, Williams T, Yoon S. Grade 5 Radiation Necrosis After Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:87-92. [PMID: 38431371 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Whole-brain radiation treatment is often considered for patients with leptomeningeal disease. There are limited reports of the development of radiation necrosis after whole-brain radiation treatment and fewer associating the presence of germline mutations with risk. We present a case report to highlight the need for consideration of radiosensitizing mutations when recommending radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Tam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Yun Rose Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Terence Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Stephanie Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kaidar-Person O, Tramm T, Kuehn T, Gentilini O, Prat A, Montay-Gruel P, Meattini I, Poortmans P. Optimising of axillary therapy in breast cancer: lessons from the past to plan for a better future. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:315-327. [PMID: 37922004 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01743-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023]
Abstract
In this narrative review, we aim to explore the ability of radiation therapy to eradicate breast cancer regional node metastasis. It is a journey through data of older trials without systemic therapy showing the magnitude of axillary therapy (surgery versus radiation) on cancer control. Considering that both systemic and loco-regional therapies were shown to reduce any recurrence with a complex interaction, our review includes surgical, radiation, and radiobiology consideration for breast cancer, and provide our view of future practise. The aim is to provide information optimise radiation therapy in the era of primary systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Radiation Unit, Sheba Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
- School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
- Department Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Oreste Gentilini
- Breast Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, UniSR, Milano, Italy
| | - Aleix Prat
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Cancer Insititute, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang Y, Li Z, Zou B. Radiation and resolve: unlocking the synergistic potential of radioimmunotherapy in advanced lung cancer management. Immunotherapy 2024; 16:55-58. [PMID: 38054261 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2023-0268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Plain language summary This editorial talks about combining radiation therapy (using high-energy rays to kill cancer cells) and immunotherapy (boosting the body's immune system to fight cancer) to treat advanced lung cancer. When used together, these therapies can work better to kill more cancer cells and help patients live longer. But, there's still a lot we don't know. For instance, we need to figure out the best timing and doses for these treatments, and which patients will benefit the most. The article stresses that more research is needed to answer these questions and make this combined treatment a more effective option for advanced lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhang
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R. China
| | - Zheng Li
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R. China
| | - Bingwen Zou
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Linge A, Patil S, Grosser M, Lohaus F, Gurtner K, Kemper M, Gudziol V, Haim D, Nowak A, Tinhofer I, Zips D, Guberina M, Stuschke M, Balermpas P, Rödel C, Schäfer H, Grosu AL, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Pigorsch S, Combs SE, Boeke S, Gani C, Jöhrens K, Baretton GB, Löck S, Baumann M, Krause M. The value of subcutaneous xenografts for individualised radiotherapy in HNSCC: Robust gene signature correlates with radiotherapy outcome in patients and xenografts. Radiother Oncol 2024; 191:110055. [PMID: 38109944 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the robustness of prognostic biomarkers and molecular tumour subtypes developed for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) on cell-line derived HNSCC xenograft models, and to develop a novel biomarker signature by combining xenograft and patient datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mice bearing xenografts (n = 59) of ten HNSCC cell lines and a retrospective, multicentre patient cohort (n = 242) of the German Cancer Consortium-Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK-ROG) were included. All patients received postoperative radiochemotherapy (PORT-C). Gene expression analysis was conducted using GeneChip Human Transcriptome Arrays. Xenografts were stratified based on their molecular subtypes and previously established gene classifiers. The dose to control 50 % of tumours (TCD50) was compared between these groups. Using differential gene expression analyses combining xenograft and patient data, a gene signature was developed to define risk groups for the primary endpoint loco-regional control (LRC). RESULTS Tumours of mesenchymal subtype were characterized by a higher TCD50 (xenografts, p < 0.001) and lower LRC (patients, p < 0.001) compared to the other subtypes. Similar to previously published patient data, hypoxia- and radioresistance-related gene signatures were associated with high TCD50 values. A 2-gene signature (FN1, SERPINE1) was developed that was prognostic for TCD50 (xenografts, p < 0.001) and for patient outcome in independent validation (LRC: p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Genetic prognosticators of outcome for patients after PORT-C and subcutaneous xenografts after primary clinically relevant irradiation show similarity. The identified robust 2-gene signature may help to guide patient stratification, after prospective validation. Thus, xenografts remain a valuable resource for translational research towards the development of individualized radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annett Linge
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
| | - Shivaprasad Patil
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marianne Grosser
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Kristin Gurtner
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Max Kemper
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Gudziol
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Dominik Haim
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Nowak
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Inge Tinhofer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Maja Guberina
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Henning Schäfer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Translational Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Group Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Steffi Pigorsch
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany; Department of RadioOncology, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany; Department of RadioOncology, Technische Universität München, Germany; Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Korinna Jöhrens
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo B Baretton
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Tumour- and Normal Tissue Bank, University Cancer Centre (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Radiooncology/Radiobiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Browning AP, Lewin TD, Baker RE, Maini PK, Moros EG, Caudell J, Byrne HM, Enderling H. Predicting Radiotherapy Patient Outcomes with Real-Time Clinical Data Using Mathematical Modelling. Bull Math Biol 2024; 86:19. [PMID: 38238433 PMCID: PMC10796515 DOI: 10.1007/s11538-023-01246-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
Longitudinal tumour volume data from head-and-neck cancer patients show that tumours of comparable pre-treatment size and stage may respond very differently to the same radiotherapy fractionation protocol. Mathematical models are often proposed to predict treatment outcome in this context, and have the potential to guide clinical decision-making and inform personalised fractionation protocols. Hindering effective use of models in this context is the sparsity of clinical measurements juxtaposed with the model complexity required to produce the full range of possible patient responses. In this work, we present a compartment model of tumour volume and tumour composition, which, despite relative simplicity, is capable of producing a wide range of patient responses. We then develop novel statistical methodology and leverage a cohort of existing clinical data to produce a predictive model of both tumour volume progression and the associated level of uncertainty that evolves throughout a patient's course of treatment. To capture inter-patient variability, all model parameters are patient specific, with a bootstrap particle filter-like Bayesian approach developed to model a set of training data as prior knowledge. We validate our approach against a subset of unseen data, and demonstrate both the predictive ability of our trained model and its limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas D Lewin
- Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ruth E Baker
- Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Philip K Maini
- Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Eduardo G Moros
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Jimmy Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Helen M Byrne
- Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Heiko Enderling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA.
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hsu FM, Chang YL, Chen CY, Lin SR, Cheng JCH. Hybridization Protection Reaction for Sensitive and Robust Gene Expression Profiling of Clinical Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Samples. Clin Chem 2023; 69:1385-1395. [PMID: 37964418 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND RNA profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues for the molecular diagnostics of disease prognosis or treatment response is often irreproducible and limited to a handful of biomarkers. This has led to an unmet need for robust multiplexed assays that can profile several RNA biomarkers of interest using a limited amount of specimen. Here, we describe hybridization protection reaction (HPR), which is a novel RNA profiling approach with high reproducibility. METHODS HPR assays were designed for multiple genes, including 10 radiosensitivity-associated genes, and compared with TaqMan assays. Performance was tested with synthetic RNA fragments, and the ability to analyze RNA was investigated in FPPE samples from 20 normal lung tissues, 40 lung cancer, and 30 esophageal cancer biopsies. RESULTS Experiments performed on 3 synthetic RNA fragments demonstrated a linear dynamic range of over 1000-fold with a replicate correlation coefficient of 0.99 and high analytical sensitivity between 3.2 to 10 000 pM. Comparison of HPR with standard quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction on FFPE specimens shows nonsignificant differences with > 99% confidence interval between 2 assays in transcript profiling of 91.7% of test transcripts. In addition, HPR was effectively applied to quantify transcript levels of 10 radiosensitivity-associated genes. CONCLUSIONS Overall, HPR is an alternative approach for RNA profiling with high sensitivity, reproducibility, robustness, and capability for molecular diagnostics in FFPE tumor biopsy specimens of lung and esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng-Ming Hsu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100225, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology and Cancer Research Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100025, Taiwan
| | - Yih-Leong Chang
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100225, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Yung Chen
- Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chungli District, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan
- Center for Nanotechnology and Center for Biomedical Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Rung Lin
- Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chungli District, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan
- Center for Nanotechnology and Center for Biomedical Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan
| | - Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100225, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology and Cancer Research Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100025, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zschaeck S, Klinger B, van den Hoff J, Cegla P, Apostolova I, Kreissl MC, Cholewiński W, Kukuk E, Strobel H, Amthauer H, Blüthgen N, Zips D, Hofheinz F. Combination of tumor asphericity and an extracellular matrix-related prognostic gene signature in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20840. [PMID: 38012155 PMCID: PMC10681996 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46405-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
One important aim of precision oncology is a personalized treatment of patients. This can be achieved by various biomarkers, especially imaging parameters and gene expression signatures are commonly used. So far, combination approaches are sparse. The aim of the study was to independently validate the prognostic value of the novel positron emission tomography (PET) parameter tumor asphericity (ASP) in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and to investigate associations between published gene expression profiles and ASP. This was a retrospective evaluation of PET imaging and gene expression data from three public databases and two institutional datasets. The whole cohort comprised 253 NSCLC patients, all treated with curative intent surgery. Clinical parameters, standard PET parameters and ASP were evaluated in all patients. Additional gene expression data were available for 120 patients. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for the primary endpoint progression-free survival (PFS) and additional endpoints. Furthermore, multivariate cox regression testing was performed including clinically significant parameters, ASP, and the extracellular matrix-related prognostic gene signature (EPPI). In the whole cohort, a significant association with PFS was observed for ASP (p < 0.001) and EPPI (p = 0.012). Upon multivariate testing, EPPI remained significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.018) in the subgroup of patients with additional gene expression data, while ASP was significantly associated with PFS in the whole cohort (p = 0.012). In stage II patients, ASP was significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.009), and a previously published cutoff value for ASP (19.5%) was successfully validated (p = 0.008). In patients with additional gene expression data, EPPI showed a significant association with PFS, too (p = 0.033). The exploratory combination of ASP and EPPI showed that the combinatory approach has potential to further improve patient stratification compared to the use of only one parameter. We report the first successful validation of EPPI and ASP in stage II NSCLC patients. The combination of both parameters seems to be a very promising approach for improvement of risk stratification in a group of patients with urgent need for a more personalized treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bertram Klinger
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178, Berlin, Germany
- Computational Modelling in Medicine, Instiute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Paulina Cegla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Ivayla Apostolova
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Michael C Kreissl
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Witold Cholewiński
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Emily Kukuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helen Strobel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Blüthgen
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178, Berlin, Germany
- Computational Modelling in Medicine, Instiute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tam A, Mercier BD, Thomas RM, Tizpa E, Wong IG, Shi J, Garg R, Hampel H, Gray SW, Williams T, Bazan JG, Li YR. Moving the Needle Forward in Genomically-Guided Precision Radiation Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5314. [PMID: 38001574 PMCID: PMC10669735 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation treatment (RT) is a mainstay treatment for many types of cancer. Recommendations for RT and the radiation plan are individualized to each patient, taking into consideration the patient's tumor pathology, staging, anatomy, and other clinical characteristics. Information on germline mutations and somatic tumor mutations is at present rarely used to guide specific clinical decisions in RT. Many genes, such as ATM, and BRCA1/2, have been identified in the laboratory to confer radiation sensitivity. However, our understanding of the clinical significance of mutations in these genes remains limited and, as individual mutations in such genes can be rare, their impact on tumor response and toxicity remains unclear. Current guidelines, including those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), provide limited guidance on how genetic results should be integrated into RT recommendations. With an increasing understanding of the molecular underpinning of radiation response, genomically-guided RT can inform decisions surrounding RT dose, volume, concurrent therapies, and even omission to further improve oncologic outcomes and reduce risks of toxicities. Here, we review existing evidence from laboratory, pre-clinical, and clinical studies with regard to how genetic alterations may affect radiosensitivity. We also summarize recent data from clinical trials and explore potential future directions to utilize genetic data to support clinical decision-making in developing a pathway toward personalized RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Tam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.T.); (B.D.M.); (R.M.T.); (E.T.); (I.G.W.); (J.S.); (R.G.); (T.W.)
| | - Benjamin D. Mercier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.T.); (B.D.M.); (R.M.T.); (E.T.); (I.G.W.); (J.S.); (R.G.); (T.W.)
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (H.H.); (S.W.G.)
| | - Reeny M. Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.T.); (B.D.M.); (R.M.T.); (E.T.); (I.G.W.); (J.S.); (R.G.); (T.W.)
| | - Eemon Tizpa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.T.); (B.D.M.); (R.M.T.); (E.T.); (I.G.W.); (J.S.); (R.G.); (T.W.)
| | - Irene G. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.T.); (B.D.M.); (R.M.T.); (E.T.); (I.G.W.); (J.S.); (R.G.); (T.W.)
| | - Juncong Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.T.); (B.D.M.); (R.M.T.); (E.T.); (I.G.W.); (J.S.); (R.G.); (T.W.)
| | - Rishabh Garg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.T.); (B.D.M.); (R.M.T.); (E.T.); (I.G.W.); (J.S.); (R.G.); (T.W.)
| | - Heather Hampel
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (H.H.); (S.W.G.)
| | - Stacy W. Gray
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (H.H.); (S.W.G.)
| | - Terence Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.T.); (B.D.M.); (R.M.T.); (E.T.); (I.G.W.); (J.S.); (R.G.); (T.W.)
| | - Jose G. Bazan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.T.); (B.D.M.); (R.M.T.); (E.T.); (I.G.W.); (J.S.); (R.G.); (T.W.)
| | - Yun R. Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (A.T.); (B.D.M.); (R.M.T.); (E.T.); (I.G.W.); (J.S.); (R.G.); (T.W.)
- Department of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
- Division of Quantitative Medicine & Systems Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ 85022, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lu C, Sun Q, Guo Y, Han X, Zhang M, Liu J, Wang Y, Mou Y, Li Y, Song X. Construction and validation of a prognostic nine-gene signature associated with radiosensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 43:100686. [PMID: 37854672 PMCID: PMC10579965 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy is an effective treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), however how to predict the prognosis is not clear. Methods Here we collected 262 radiosensitivity-associated genes, screened and constructed a prognostic nine-gene risk model through univariate COX, lasso regression, stepwise regression and multivariate COX analysis for transcriptome and clinical information of HNSCC patients obtained from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) and gene expression omnibus (GEO) databases. Results The reliability and robustness of the risk model were verified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, risk maps, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves analysis. Differences in immune cell infiltration and immune-related pathway enrichment between high-risk and low-risk subgroups were determined by multiple immune infiltration analyses. Meanwhile, the mutation map and the responses to immunotherapy were also differentiated by the prognostic nine-gene signature associated with radiosensitivity. These nine genes expression in HNSCC was verified in the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database. After that, these nine genes expression was verified to be related to radiation resistance through in-vitro cell experiments. Conclusions All results showed that the nine-gene signature associated with radiosensitivity is a potential prognostic indicator for HNSCC patients after radiotherapy and provides potential gene targets for enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Congxian Lu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, China
| | - Qi Sun
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, China
| | - Ying Guo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, China
| | - Xiao Han
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, China
| | - Mingjun Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, China
| | - Jiahui Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, China
| | - Yaqi Wang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, China
| | - Yakui Mou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, China
| | - Yumei Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, China
| | - Xicheng Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
McClure EM, Sedor G, Jin Y, Kattan MW. Image-guided superficial radiation therapy has superior 2-year recurrence probability to Mohs micrographic surgery. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 43:100678. [PMID: 37781716 PMCID: PMC10539860 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are the most common cancers in the USA, and their incidence is rising. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is commonly performed to excise NMSCs. MMS replaced superficial radiotherapy (SRT) as a first line treatment, given its superior efficacy. Image-guided superficial radiation therapy (IGSRT) was invented to improve the precision of SRT. This study investigates how the 2-year recurrence probability of IGSRT-treated NMSCs compares to that of MMS-treated lesions. Methods This retrospective cohort study compared the 2-year recurrence probability of early stage NMSCs (squamous and basal cell carcinomas (SCCs and BCCs)) treated by IGSRT (2,286 lesions) to data on NMSCs treated by MMS (5,391 lesions) via one sample proportion tests. Medical Subject Headings were used to search PubMed for reports of 2-year recurrence probability rates of NMSCs treated by MMS. Seventeen studies were screened; 14 studies were excluded for lack of 2-year time to event analysis, or irrelevant patient population (non-BCC/SCC study, advanced disease), leaving 3 studies for comparison. Results IGSRT-treated NMSCs have a statistically significantly improved 2-year recurrence probability than those treated by MMS, P < 0.001 for pooled data. Conclusion The 2-year recurrence probability IGSRT-treated NMSCs is superior to MMS-treated and supports IGSRT as an effective treatment option for individuals with early stage NMSCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M. McClure
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL 33602, United States
| | - Geoffrey Sedor
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Yuxuan Jin
- Cleveland Clinic, Dept of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mail Code JJN3, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Michael W. Kattan
- Cleveland Clinic, Dept of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mail Code JJN3, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tsai YC, Hsin MC, Liu RJ, Li TW, Ch’ang HJ. Krüppel-like Factor 10 as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker of Radiotherapy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5212. [PMID: 37958386 PMCID: PMC10648792 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 12%. Although radiotherapy is effective for the locoregional control of PDAC, it does not have survival benefits compared with systemic chemotherapy. Most patients with localized PDAC develop distant metastasis shortly after diagnosis. Upfront chemotherapy has been suggested so that patients with localized PDAC with early distant metastasis do not have to undergo radical local therapy. Several potential tissue markers have been identified for selecting patients who may benefit from local radiotherapy, thereby prolonging their survival. This review summarizes these biomarkers including SMAD4, which is significantly associated with PDAC failure patterns and survival. In particular, Krüppel-like factor 10 (KLF10) is an early response transcription factor of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β. Unlike TGF-β in advanced cancers, KLF10 loss in two-thirds of patients with PDAC was associated with rapid distant metastasis and radioresistance; thus, KLF10 can serve as a predictive and therapeutic marker for PDAC. For patients with resectable PDAC, a combination of KLF10 and SMAD4 expression in tumor tissues may help select those who may benefit the most from additional radiotherapy. Future trials should consider upfront systemic therapy or include molecular biomarker-enriched patients without early distant metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chih Tsai
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 350, Taiwan; (Y.-C.T.); (M.-C.H.)
| | - Min-Chieh Hsin
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 350, Taiwan; (Y.-C.T.); (M.-C.H.)
| | - Rui-Jun Liu
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 350, Taiwan; (Y.-C.T.); (M.-C.H.)
| | - Ting-Wei Li
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 350, Taiwan; (Y.-C.T.); (M.-C.H.)
| | - Hui-Ju Ch’ang
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 350, Taiwan; (Y.-C.T.); (M.-C.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Program for Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Department of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bryant JM, Doniparthi A, Weygand J, Cruz-Chamorro R, Oraiqat IM, Andreozzi J, Graham J, Redler G, Latifi K, Feygelman V, Rosenberg SA, Yu HHM, Oliver DE. Treatment of Central Nervous System Tumors on Combination MR-Linear Accelerators: Review of Current Practice and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5200. [PMID: 37958374 PMCID: PMC10649155 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent visualization of central nervous system (CNS) tumors due to its superior soft tissue contrast. Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has historically been limited to use in the initial treatment planning stage due to cost and feasibility. MRI-guided linear accelerators (MRLs) allow clinicians to visualize tumors and organs at risk (OARs) directly before and during treatment, a process known as online MRgRT. This novel system permits adaptive treatment planning based on anatomical changes to ensure accurate dose delivery to the tumor while minimizing unnecessary toxicity to healthy tissue. These advancements are critical to treatment adaptation in the brain and spinal cord, where both preliminary MRI and daily CT guidance have typically had limited benefit. In this narrative review, we investigate the application of online MRgRT in the treatment of various CNS malignancies and any relevant ongoing clinical trials. Imaging of glioblastoma patients has shown significant changes in the gross tumor volume over a standard course of chemoradiotherapy. The use of adaptive online MRgRT in these patients demonstrated reduced target volumes with cavity shrinkage and a resulting reduction in radiation dose to uninvolved tissue. Dosimetric feasibility studies have shown MRL-guided stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for intracranial and spine tumors to have potential dosimetric advantages and reduced morbidity compared with conventional linear accelerators. Similarly, dosimetric feasibility studies have shown promise in hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT). Next, we explore the potential of MRL-based multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and genomically informed radiotherapy to treat CNS disease with cutting-edge precision. Lastly, we explore the challenges of treating CNS malignancies and special limitations MRL systems face.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Michael Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Ajay Doniparthi
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33602, USA;
| | - Joseph Weygand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Ruben Cruz-Chamorro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Ibrahim M. Oraiqat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Jacqueline Andreozzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Jasmine Graham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Gage Redler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Vladimir Feygelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Stephen A. Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| | - Daniel E. Oliver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (I.M.O.); (J.A.); (G.R.); (K.L.); (H.-H.M.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zhao S, Wang Q, Liu Y, Zhang P, Ji W, Xie J, Cheng C. Interaction, immune infiltration characteristics and prognostic modeling of efferocytosis-related subtypes in glioblastoma. BMC Med Genomics 2023; 16:248. [PMID: 37853449 PMCID: PMC10583324 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-023-01688-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efferocytosis is a biological process in which phagocytes remove apoptotic cells and vesicles from tissues. This process is initiated by the release of inflammatory mediators from apoptotic cells and plays a crucial role in resolving inflammation. The signals associated with efferocytosis have been found to regulate the inflammatory response and the tumor microenvironment (TME), which promotes the immune escape of tumor cells. However, the role of efferocytosis in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is not well understood and requires further investigation. METHODS In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 22 efferocytosis-related genes (ERGs) by searching for studies related to efferocytosis. Using bulk RNA-Seq and single-cell sequencing data, we analyzed the expression and mutational characteristics of these ERGs. By using an unsupervised clustering algorithm, we obtained ERG clusters from 549 GBM patients and evaluated the immune infiltration characteristics of each cluster. We then identified differential genes (DEGs) in the two ERG clusters and classified GBM patients into different gene clusters using univariate cox analysis and unsupervised clustering algorithms. Finally, we utilized the Boruta algorithm to screen for prognostic genes and reduce dimensionality, and the PCA algorithm was applied to create a novel efferocytosis-related scoring system. RESULTS Differential expression of ERGs in glioma cell lines and normal cells was analyzed by rt-PCR. Cell function experiments, on the other hand, validated TIMD4 as a tumor risk factor in GBM. We found that different ERG clusters and gene clusters have distinct prognostic and immune infiltration profiles. The ERG signature we developed provides insight into the tumor microenvironment of GBM. Patients with lower ERG scores have a better survival rate and a higher likelihood of benefiting from immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Our novel efferocytosis-related signature has the potential to be used in clinical practice for risk stratification of GBM patients and for selecting individuals who are likely to respond to immunotherapy. This can help clinicians design appropriate targeted therapies before initiating clinical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Songyun Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Yuankun Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
| | - Pengpeng Zhang
- Department of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Wei Ji
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
| | - Jiaheng Xie
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
| | - Chao Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kutuva AR, Caudell JJ, Yamoah K, Enderling H, Zahid MU. Mathematical modeling of radiotherapy: impact of model selection on estimating minimum radiation dose for tumor control. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1130966. [PMID: 37901317 PMCID: PMC10600389 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1130966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the most common anticancer therapies. Yet, current radiation oncology practice does not adapt RT dose for individual patients, despite wide interpatient variability in radiosensitivity and accompanying treatment response. We have previously shown that mechanistic mathematical modeling of tumor volume dynamics can simulate volumetric response to RT for individual patients and estimation personalized RT dose for optimal tumor volume reduction. However, understanding the implications of the choice of the underlying RT response model is critical when calculating personalized RT dose. Methods In this study, we evaluate the mathematical implications and biological effects of 2 models of RT response on dose personalization: (1) cytotoxicity to cancer cells that lead to direct tumor volume reduction (DVR) and (2) radiation responses to the tumor microenvironment that lead to tumor carrying capacity reduction (CCR) and subsequent tumor shrinkage. Tumor growth was simulated as logistic growth with pre-treatment dynamics being described in the proliferation saturation index (PSI). The effect of RT was simulated according to each respective model for a standard schedule of fractionated RT with 2 Gy weekday fractions. Parameter sweeps were evaluated for the intrinsic tumor growth rate and the radiosensitivity parameter for both models to observe the qualitative impact of each model parameter. We then calculated the minimum RT dose required for locoregional tumor control (LRC) across all combinations of the full range of radiosensitvity and proliferation saturation values. Results Both models estimate that patients with higher radiosensitivity will require a lower RT dose to achieve LRC. However, the two models make opposite estimates on the impact of PSI on the minimum RT dose for LRC: the DVR model estimates that tumors with higher PSI values will require a higher RT dose to achieve LRC, while the CCR model estimates that higher PSI values will require a lower RT dose to achieve LRC. Discussion Ultimately, these results show the importance of understanding which model best describes tumor growth and treatment response in a particular setting, before using any such model to make estimates for personalized treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achyudhan R. Kutuva
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
- Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jimmy J. Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Heiko Enderling
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Mohammad U. Zahid
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
McLaren DB, Aitman TJ. Redefining precision radiotherapy through liquid biopsy. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:900-903. [PMID: 37598284 PMCID: PMC10491827 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02398-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision radiotherapy refers to the ability to deliver radiation doses with sub-millimetre accuracy. It does not however consider individual variation in tumour or normal tissue response, failing to maximise tumour control and minimise toxicity. Combining precise delivery with personalised dosing, through analysis of cell-free DNA, would redefine precision in radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D B McLaren
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| | - T J Aitman
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Machiels M, Oulkadi R, Tramm T, Stecklein SR, Somaiah N, De Caluwé A, Klein J, Tran WT, Salgado R. Individualising radiation therapy decisions in breast cancer patients based on tumour infiltrating lymphocytes and genomic biomarkers. Breast 2023; 71:13-21. [PMID: 37437386 PMCID: PMC10512095 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) has long been fundamental for the curative treatment of breast cancer. While substantial progress has been made in the anatomical and technological precision of RT delivery, and some approaches to de-escalate or omit RT based on clinicopathologic features have been successful, there remain substantial opportunities to refine individualised RT based on tumour biology. A major area of clinical and research interest is to ascertain the individualised risk of loco-regional recurrence to direct treatment decisions regarding escalation and de-escalation of RT. Patient-tailored treatment with RT is considerably lagging behind compared with the massive progress made in the field of personalised medicine that currently mainly applies to decisions on the use of systemic therapy or targeted agents. Herein we review select literature surrounding the use of tumour genomic biomarkers and biomarkers of the immune system, including tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), within the management of breast cancer, specifically as they relate to progress in moving toward analytically validated and clinically tested biomarkers utilized in RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Machiels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, University of Antwerp, Health & Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Redouane Oulkadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, University of Antwerp, Health & Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Shane R Stecklein
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, And Cancer Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, KS, USA
| | - Navita Somaiah
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Alex De Caluwé
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jonathan Klein
- State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University and Maimonides Medical Center, NY, United States
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto & Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Pathology, GZA - ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kim E, Kim MS, Paik EK, Chang UK, Kong CB. Treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary and metastatic sarcoma of the spine. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:156. [PMID: 37736735 PMCID: PMC10514933 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02346-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in sarcoma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 44 sarcoma patients and 75 spinal lesions (6 primary tumors, 69 metastatic tumors) treated with SBRT were retrospectively reviewed between 2006 and 2017. The median radiation dose was 33 Gy (range, 18-45 Gy) in 3 fractions (range, 1-5) prescribed to the 75% isodose line. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 18.2 months. The 1-year local control was 76.4%, and patients treated with single vertebral body were identified as a favorable prognostic factor on multivariate analyses. Progression-free survival at 1 year was 31.9%, with the interval between initial diagnosis and SBRT and extent of disease at the time of treatment being significant prognostic factors. The 1-year overall survival was 80.5%, and PTV and visceral metastases were independently associated with inferior overall survival. CONCLUSION SBRT for spinal sarcoma is effective in achieving local control, particularly when treating a single vertebral level with a limited extent of disease involvement, resulting in an excellent control rate. The extent of disease at the time of SBRT is significantly correlated with survival outcomes and should be considered when treating spine sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunji Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Paik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ung-Kyu Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Bae Kong
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, 75, Nowon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01812, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ho E, De Cecco L, Cavalieri S, Sedor G, Hoebers F, Brakenhoff RH, Scheckenbach K, Poli T, Yang K, Scarborough JA, Campbell S, Koyfman S, Eschrich SA, Caudell JJ, Kattan MW, Licitra L, Torres-Roca JF, Scott JG. A clinicogenomic model including GARD predicts outcome for radiation treated patients with HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.09.14.23295538. [PMID: 37745365 PMCID: PMC10516067 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.14.23295538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Background Treatment decision-making in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) includes clinical stage, HPV status, and smoking history. Despite improvements in staging with separation of HPV-positive and -negative OPSCC in AJCC 8th edition (AJCC8), patients are largely treated with a uniform approach, with recent efforts focused on de-intensification in low-risk patients. We have previously shown, in a pooled analysis, that the genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD) is predictive of radiation treatment benefit and can be used to guide RT dose selection. We hypothesize that GARD can be used to predict overall survival (OS) in HPV-positive OPSCC patients treated with radiotherapy (RT). Methods Gene expression profiles (Affymetrix Clariom D) were analyzed for 234 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples from HPV-positive OPSCC patients within an international, multi-institutional, prospective/retrospective observational study including patients with AJCC 7th edition stage III-IVb. GARD, a measure of the treatment effect of RT, was calculated for each patient as previously described. In total, 191 patients received primary RT definitive treatment (chemoradiation or RT alone, and 43 patients received post-operative RT. Two RT dose fractionations were utilized for primary RT cases (70 Gy in 35 fractions or 69.96 Gy in 33 fractions). Median RT dose was 70 Gy (range 50.88-74) for primary RT definitive cases and 66 Gy (range 44-70) for post-operative RT cases. The median follow up was 46.2 months (95% CI, 33.5-63.1). Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed with GARD as both a continuous and dichotomous variable and time-dependent ROC analyses compared the performance of GARD with the NRG clinical nomogram for overall survival. Results Despite uniform radiation dose utilization, GARD showed significant heterogeneity (range 30-110), reflecting the underlying genomic differences in the cohort. On multivariable analysis, each unit increase in GARD was associated with an improvement in OS (HR = 0.951 (0.911, 0.993), p = 0.023) compared to AJCC8 (HR = 1.999 (0.791, 5.047)), p = 0.143). ROC analysis for GARD at 36 months yielded an AUC of 80.6 (69.4, 91.9) compared with an AUC of 73.6 (55.4, 91.7) for the NRG clinical nomogram. GARD≥64.2 was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.280 (0.100, 0.781), p = 0.015). In a virtual trial, GARD predicts that uniform RT dose de-escalation results in overall inferior OS but proposes two separate genomic strategies where selective RT dose de-escalation in GARD-selected populations results in clinical equipoise. Conclusions In this multi-institutional cohort of patients with HPV-positive OPSCC, GARD predicts OS as a continuous variable, outperforms the NRG nomogram and provides a novel genomic strategy to modern clinical trial design. We propose that GARD, which provides the first opportunity for genomic guided personalization of radiation dose, should be incorporated in the diagnostic workup of HPV-positive OPSCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Ho
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Loris De Cecco
- UO Molecular Mechanisms, Experimental Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Cavalieri
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Geoffrey Sedor
- Radiation Oncology Department, NYPH/Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Frank Hoebers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud H Brakenhoff
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kathrin Scheckenbach
- Department of Otolaryngology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tito Poli
- Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma-University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Kailin Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jessica A. Scarborough
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- Departments of Physics and Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shauna Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shlomo Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Steven A. Eschrich
- Department of Biostatistics and Biomedical Informatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Jimmy J. Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Michael W. Kattan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Clevelan OH
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Javier F. Torres-Roca
- Department of Biostatistics and Biomedical Informatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Jacob G. Scott
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Departments of Physics and Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ma Y, Sun Y, Zhao X, Li J, Fu X, Gong T, Zhang X. Identification of m 5C-related lncRNAs signature to predict prognosis and therapeutic responses in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:14499. [PMID: 37666951 PMCID: PMC10477299 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41495-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has a dismal prognosis because of atypical early symptoms and heterogeneous therapeutic responses. 5-methylcytosine (m5C) modification plays an important role in the onset and development of many tumors and is widespread in long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) transcripts. However, the functions of m5C and lncRNAs in ESCC have not been completely elucidated. Herein, this study aimed to explore the role of m5C-related lncRNAs in ESCC. The RNA-seq transcriptome profiles and clinical information were downloaded from the TCGA-ESCC database. Pearson analysis was used to identify m5C-related lncRNAs. Then we established the m5C-related lncRNAs prognostic signature (m5C-LPS) using univariate Cox and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Then, the prognostic value of m5C-LPS was evaluated internally and externally using the TCGA-ESCC and GSE53622 databases through multiple methods. We also detected the expression of these lncRNAs in ESCC cell lines and patient tissues. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to detect the prognostic value of specific lncRNA. In addition, clinical parameters, immune status, genomic variants, oncogenic pathways, enrichment pathways, and therapeutic response features associated with m5C-LPS were explored using bioinformatics methods. We constructed and validated a prognostic signature based on 9 m5C-related lncRNAs (AC002091.2, AC009275.1, CAHM, LINC02057.1, AC0006329.1, AC037459.3, AC064807.1, ATP2B1-AS1, and UBAC2-AS1). The quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) revealed that most lncRNAs were upregulated in ESCC cell lines and patient tissues. And AC002091.2 was validated to have significant prognostic value in ESCC patients. A composite nomogram was generated to facilitate clinical practice by integrating this signature with the N stage. Besides, patients in the low-risk group were characterized by good clinical outcomes, favorable immune status, and low oncogenic alteration. Function enrichment analysis indicated that the risk score was associated with mRNA splicing, ncRNA processing, and DNA damage repair response. At the same time, we found significant differences in the responses to chemoradiotherapy between the two groups, proving the value of m5C-LPS in treatment decision-making in ESCC. This study established a novel prognostic signature based on 9 m5C-related lncRNAs, which is a promising biomarker for predicting clinical outcomes and therapeutic response in ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road 277, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yuchen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road 277, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road 277, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road 277, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xing Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road 277, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Tuotuo Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road 277, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Xiaozhi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road 277, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jaffray DA, Knaul F, Baumann M, Gospodarowicz M. Harnessing progress in radiotherapy for global cancer control. NATURE CANCER 2023; 4:1228-1238. [PMID: 37749355 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00619-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
The pace of technological innovation over the past three decades has transformed the field of radiotherapy into one of the most technologically intense disciplines in medicine. However, the global barriers to access this highly effective treatment are complex and extend beyond technological limitations. Here, we review the technological advancement and current status of radiotherapy and discuss the efforts of the global radiation oncology community to formulate a more integrative 'diagonal approach' in which the agendas of science-driven advances in individual outcomes and the sociotechnological task of global cancer control can be aligned to bring the benefit of this proven therapy to patients with cancer everywhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Jaffray
- Departments of Radiation Physics and Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Felicia Knaul
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Mary Gospodarowicz
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Torres-Roca JF, Eschrich SA, Kattan MW, Scott JG. Response to Mistry: Radiosensitivity index is not fit to be used for dose adjustments: A pan-cancer analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:621-623. [PMID: 37210320 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J F Torres-Roca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA; College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
| | - S A Eschrich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA; College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - M W Kattan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - J G Scott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; School of Medicine Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mistry HB. Radiosensitivity Index is Not Fit to be Used for Dose Adjustments: A Pan-Cancer Analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:565-570. [PMID: 36922240 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To explore the preclinical and latest clinical evidence of the radiation sensitivity signature termed 'radiosensitivity index' (RSI), to assess its suitability as an input into dose-adjustment algorithms. MATERIALS AND METHODS The original preclinical test-set data from the publication where RSI was derived were collected and reanalysed by comparing the observed versus predicted survival fraction at 2 Gy (SF2). In addition, the predictive capability of RSI was also compared to random guessing. Clinical data were collected from a recently published dataset that included RSI values, overall survival outcomes, radiotherapy dose and tumour site for six cancers (glioma, triple-negative breast, endometrial, melanoma, pancreatic and lung cancer). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess: (i) does adjusting for RSI elucidate a dose response and (ii) does an interaction between RSI and dose exist with good precision. RESULTS Preclinically, RSI showed a negative correlation (Spearman's rho = -0.61) between observed and predicted SF2, which remained negative after removing leukaemia cell lines. Furthermore, random guesses showed better correlation to SF2 than RSI, 98% of the time on the full dataset and 80% after removing leukaemia cell lines. The preclinical data show that RSI does not explain the variance in SF2 better than random guessing. Clinically, a dose response was not seen after adjusting for RSI (hazard ratio = 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.04; P = 0.876) and no evidence of an interaction between RSI and dose was found (P = 0.844). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that RSI does not explain a sufficient amount of the outcome variance to be used within dose-adjustment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H B Mistry
- Division of Pharmacy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ottenhof SR, de Vries HM, Doodeman B, Vrijenhoek GL, van der Noort V, Donswijk ML, de Feijter JM, Schaake EE, Horenblas S, Brouwer OR, van der Heijden MS, Pos FJ. A Prospective Study of Chemoradiotherapy as Primary Treatment in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Penile Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:139-147. [PMID: 37030606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for locoregionally advanced penile carcinoma (LAPSCC) is associated with severe toxicity and a 1-year survival probability of ∼50%. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the primary treatment for LAPSCC and the association of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with the outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm study of CRT in LAPSCC, defined as a large/inoperable primary tumor, large palpable nodes, suspicion of extranodal extension or pelvic nodal involvement, and no distant metastases. CRT consisted of 49.5 Gy (33 × 1.5 Gy) on affected inguinal and pelvic areas combined with intravenous mitomycin C on day 1 and capecitabine on radiation days. Primary tumors and positron emission tomography/computed tomography-positive deposits received a boost of 59.4 Gy (33 × 1.8 Gy). The response was evaluated by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. If feasible, patients with residual/recurrent disease underwent salvage surgery. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), reached when 1-year PFS was ≥50%. Other endpoints were 2-year PFS, overall survival, and toxicity rates. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were included: 29 (88%) with stage IV disease (T4 any-N M0 and/or any-T N3 M0) and 8 (24%) with hrHPV-positive disease. Median follow-up was 41 months. Thirty-two completed CRT. Eleven (33%) experienced ≥1 grade 3 treatment-related adverse event. There were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related events. Twenty-four patients (73%) responded, including 13 (39%) complete responses. Nine patients (27%) underwent salvage surgery, and an additional 8 patients underwent later surgery (together 52%). One- and 2-year PFS were 34% and 31%, respectively. One- and 2-year overall survival were 73% and 46%, respectively. No significant difference between patients with hrHPV-positive and -negative tumors was observed. CONCLUSIONS CRT is a viable treatment option for LAPSCC with acceptable toxicity. CRT can result in an enduring response. If patients have residual tumor, salvage surgery is feasible. HrHPV status was not associated with outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Barry Doodeman
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Maarten Lucas Donswijk
- Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eva Eline Schaake
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Departments of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Floris Jop Pos
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jan IS, Ch'ang HJ. Selection of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who may benefit from radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:137. [PMID: 37596627 PMCID: PMC10439654 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02328-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite combination chemotherapy demonstrating a positive effect on survival, the clinical outcomes of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain poor. Radiotherapy was previously a component of the curative treatment of PDAC. Advances in imaging and computer sciences have enabled the prescription of higher dosage of radiation focused on tumours with minimal toxicity to normal tissue. However, the role of radiotherapy has not been established in the curative treatment of localized PDAC because of the conflicting results from large prospective trials. Most studies have demonstrated improved locoregional control but no survival benefit from additional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in addition to chemotherapy for resectable, borderline or locally advanced PDAC. The improved locoregional control enabled by CRT does not cause extended survival because of rapid distant progression in a significant proportion of patients with PDAC. Several single-institute studies of prescribing intensive chemotherapy with modern ablative radiotherapy for locally advanced PDAC have demonstrated extended survival with an acceptable safety profile. In an analysis after long-term follow-up, the PREOPANC study demonstrated a survival benefit from neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based CRT in resected PDAC relative to upfront surgery followed by adjuvant gemcitabine only. These observations indicated that the role of radiotherapy in PDAC should be evaluated in a subgroup of patients without rapid distant progression because systemic therapy for PDAC remains underdeveloped. We reviewed critical imaging, tissue, liquid and clinical biomarkers to differentiate the heterogeneous biologic spectra of patients with PDAC to identify those who may benefit the most from local radiotherapy. Exclusion of patients with localised PDAC who develop distant progression in a short time and undergo extended upfront chemotherapy for over 4 months may enable the identification of a survival benefit of local radiotherapy. Though promising, the effectiveness of biomarkers must be validated in a multi-institutional prospective study of patients with PDAC receiving CRT or not receiving CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Shiow Jan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hui Ju Ch'ang
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
- Program for Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cho YB, Yoon N, Suh JH, Scott JG. Radio-immune response modelling for spatially fractionated radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:165010. [PMID: 37459862 PMCID: PMC10409909 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ace819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Radiation-induced cell death is a complex process influenced by physical, chemical and biological phenomena. Although consensus on the nature and the mechanism of the bystander effect were not yet made, the immune process presumably plays an important role in many aspects of the radiotherapy including the bystander effect. A mathematical model of immune response during and after radiation therapy is presented.Approach.Immune response of host body and immune suppression of tumor cells are modelled with four compartments in this study; viable tumor cells, T cell lymphocytes, immune triggering cells, and doomed cells. The growth of tumor was analyzed in two distinctive modes of tumor status (immune limited and immune escape) and its bifurcation condition.Main results.Tumors in the immune limited mode can grow only up to a finite size, named as terminal tumor volume analytically calculated from the model. The dynamics of the tumor growth in the immune escape mode is much more complex than the tumors in the immune limited mode especially when the status of tumor is close to the bifurcation condition. Radiation can kill tumor cells not only by radiation damage but also by boosting immune reaction.Significance.The model demonstrated that the highly heterogeneous dose distribution in spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) can make a drastic difference in tumor cell killing compared to the homogeneous dose distribution. SFRT cannot only enhance but also moderate the cell killing depending on the immune response triggered by many factors such as dose prescription parameters, tumor volume at the time of treatment and tumor characteristics. The model was applied to the lifted data of 67NR tumors on mice and a sarcoma patient treated multiple times over 1200 days for the treatment of tumor recurrence as a demonstration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Bin Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
| | - Nara Yoon
- Departmentof Mathematics and Computer Science, Adelphi University, New York, United States of America
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
| | - Jacob G Scott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
- Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
- Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
O'Connor JD, Overton IM, McMahon SJ. Validation of In Vitro Trained Transcriptomic Radiosensitivity Signatures in Clinical Cohorts. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3504. [PMID: 37444614 PMCID: PMC10340371 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcriptomic personalisation of radiation therapy has gained considerable interest in recent years. However, independent model testing on in vitro data has shown poor performance. In this work, we assess the reproducibility in clinical applications of radiosensitivity signatures. Agreement between radiosensitivity predictions from published signatures using different microarray normalization methods was assessed. Control signatures developed from resampled in vitro data were benchmarked in clinical cohorts. Survival analysis was performed using each gene in the clinical transcriptomic data, and gene set enrichment analysis was used to determine pathways related to model performance in predicting survival and recurrence. The normalisation approach impacted calculated radiosensitivity index (RSI) values. Indeed, the limits of agreement exceeded 20% with different normalisation approaches. No published signature significantly improved on the resampled controls for prediction of clinical outcomes. Functional annotation of gene models suggested that many overlapping biological processes are associated with cancer outcomes in RT treated and non-RT treated patients, including proliferation and immune responses. In summary, different normalisation methods should not be used interchangeably. The utility of published signatures remains unclear given the large proportion of genes relating to cancer outcome. Biological processes influencing outcome overlapped for patients treated with or without radiation suggest that existing signatures may lack specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D O'Connor
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Ian M Overton
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Stephen J McMahon
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Torres-Roca JF, Grass GD, Scott JG, Eschrich SA. Towards Data Driven RT Prescription: Integrating Genomics into RT Clinical Practice. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:221-231. [PMID: 37331777 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
The genomic era has significantly changed the practice of clinical oncology. The use of genomic-based molecular diagnostics including prognostic genomic signatures and new-generation sequencing has become routine for clinical decisions regarding cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted agents and immunotherapy. In contrast, clinical decisions regarding radiation therapy (RT) remain uninformed about the genomic heterogeneity of tumors. In this review, we discuss the clinical opportunity to utilize genomics to optimize RT dose. Although from the technical perspective, RT has been moving towards a data-driven approach, RT prescription dose is still based on a one-size-fits all approach, with most RT dose based on cancer diagnosis and stage. This approach is in direct conflict with the realization that tumors are biologically heterogeneous, and that cancer is not a single disease. Here, we discuss how genomics can be integrated into RT prescription dose, the clinical potential for this approach and how genomic-optimization of RT dose could lead to new understanding of the clinical benefit of RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier F Torres-Roca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL.
| | - G Daniel Grass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | - Jacob G Scott
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Radiation Oncology Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Steven A Eschrich
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Earland N, Chen K, Semenkovich NP, Chauhan PS, Zevallos JP, Chaudhuri AA. Emerging Roles of Circulating Tumor DNA for Increased Precision and Personalization in Radiation Oncology. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:262-278. [PMID: 37331781 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
Recent breakthroughs in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) technologies present a compelling opportunity to combine this emerging liquid biopsy approach with the field of radiogenomics, the study of how tumor genomics correlate with radiotherapy response and radiotoxicity. Canonically, ctDNA levels reflect metastatic tumor burden, although newer ultrasensitive technologies can be used after curative-intent radiotherapy of localized disease to assess ctDNA for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection or for post-treatment surveillance. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated the potential utility of ctDNA analysis across various cancer types managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, including sarcoma and cancers of the head and neck, lung, colon, rectum, bladder, and prostate . Additionally, because peripheral blood mononuclear cells are routinely collected alongside ctDNA to filter out mutations associated with clonal hematopoiesis, these cells are also available for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis and could potentially be used to detect patients at high risk for radiotoxicity. Lastly, future ctDNA assays will be utilized to better assess locoregional MRD in order to more precisely guide adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery in cases of localized disease, and guide ablative radiotherapy in cases of oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Earland
- Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Kevin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Nicholas P Semenkovich
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Lipid Research, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Pradeep S Chauhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Jose P Zevallos
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Aadel A Chaudhuri
- Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women, and the second leading cause of cancer death in women in the United States. Radiation therapy is an important component in the multimodal management of breast cancer, including early stage and locally advanced breast cancers, as well as metastatic cases. Breast cancer radiation therapy has seen significant advancements over the past 20 years. This article discusses the latest advances in the radiotherapeutic management of breast cancer, especially focusing on the technological advances in radiation treatment planning and techniques that have exploited the understanding of radiation biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital D259, 460 W 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Jose G Bazan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1145 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH 43212, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rydzewski NR, Helzer KT, Bootsma M, Shi Y, Bakhtiar H, Sjöström M, Zhao SG. Machine Learning & Molecular Radiation Tumor Biomarkers. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:243-251. [PMID: 37331779 PMCID: PMC10287033 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
Developing radiation tumor biomarkers that can guide personalized radiotherapy clinical decision making is a critical goal in the effort towards precision cancer medicine. High-throughput molecular assays paired with modern computational techniques have the potential to identify individual tumor-specific signatures and create tools that can help understand heterogenous patient outcomes in response to radiotherapy, allowing clinicians to fully benefit from the technological advances in molecular profiling and computational biology including machine learning. However, the increasingly complex nature of the data generated from high-throughput and "omics" assays require careful selection of analytical strategies. Furthermore, the power of modern machine learning techniques to detect subtle data patterns comes with special considerations to ensure that the results are generalizable. Herein, we review the computational framework of tumor biomarker development and describe commonly used machine learning approaches and how they are applied for radiation biomarker development using molecular data, as well as challenges and emerging research trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas R Rydzewski
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Kyle T Helzer
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Matthew Bootsma
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Yue Shi
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Hamza Bakhtiar
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Martin Sjöström
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Shuang G Zhao
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zhou W, He MM, Wang F, Xu RH, Wang F, Zhao Q. Latent class analysis-derived classification improves the cancer-specific death stratification of molecular subtyping in colorectal cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:60. [PMID: 37353681 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00412-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer (CRC) represent a comprehensive dissection of CRC heterogeneity. However, molecular feature-based classification systems have limitations in accurately prognosticating stratification due to the inability to distinguish cancer-specific deaths. This study aims to establish a classification system that bridges clinical characteristics, cause-specific deaths, and molecular features. We adopted latent class analysis (LCA) on 491,107 first primary CRC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to reveal hidden profiles of CRC. The LCA-derived classification scheme was further applied to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to assess its effectiveness in improving the accurate stratification of molecular-based subtypes of CRC. Four classes were identified based on latent class analysis integrating demographic and clinicopathological information of CRC patients. The LCA-derived Class 1 (LCAC1) and the LCAC2 showed a high risk of dying from non-CRC, while patients in LCAC3 had a risk of dying from CRC 1.41 times that of LCAC1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.39-1.43). LCAC4 had the lowest probability to die from non-CRC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.21-0.24) compared with LCAC1. Since the LCA-derived classification can identify patients susceptible to CRC-specific death, adjusting for this classification allows molecular-based subtypes to achieve more accurate survival stratification. We provided a classification system capable of distinguish CRC-specific death, which will improve the accuracy of consensus molecular subtypes for CRC patients' survival stratification. Further studies are warranted to confirm the molecular features of LCA-derived classification to inform potential therapeutic strategies and treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Ming-Ming He
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Fang Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| | - Qi Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Aboelezz E, Pogue BW. Review of nanomaterial advances for ionizing radiation dosimetry. APPLIED PHYSICS REVIEWS 2023; 10:021312. [PMID: 37304732 PMCID: PMC10249220 DOI: 10.1063/5.0134982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
There are a wide range of applications with ionizing radiation and a common theme throughout these is that accurate dosimetry is usually required, although many newer demands are provided by improved features in higher range, multi-spectral and particle type detected. Today, the array of dosimeters includes both offline and online tools, such as gel dosimeters, thermoluminescence (TL), scintillators, optically stimulated luminescence (OSL), radiochromic polymeric films, gels, ionization chambers, colorimetry, and electron spin resonance (ESR) measurement systems. Several future nanocomposite features and interpretation of their substantial behaviors are discussed that can lead to improvements in specific features, such as (1) lower sensitivity range, (2) less saturation at high range, (3) overall increased dynamic range, (4) superior linearity, (5) linear energy transfer and energy independence, (6) lower cost, (7) higher ease of use, and (8) improved tissue equivalence. Nanophase versions of TL and ESR dosimeters and scintillators each have potential for higher range of linearity, sometimes due to superior charge transfer to the trapping center. Both OSL and ESR detection of nanomaterials can have increased dose sensitivity because of their higher readout sensitivity with nanoscale sensing. New nanocrystalline scintillators, such as perovskite, have fundamentally important advantages in sensitivity and purposeful design for key new applications. Nanoparticle plasmon coupled sensors doped within a lower Zeff material have been an effective way to achieve enhanced sensitivity of many dosimetry systems while still achieving tissue equivalency. These nanomaterial processing techniques and unique combinations of them are key steps that lead to the advanced features. Each must be realized through industrial production and quality control with packaging into dosimetry systems that maximize stability and reproducibility. Ultimately, recommendations for future work in this field of radiation dosimetry were summarized throughout the review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eslam Aboelezz
- Ionizing Radiation Metrology Department, National Institute of Standards, Giza, Egypt
| | - Brian W. Pogue
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Asha W, Koro S, Mayo Z, Yang K, Halima A, Scott J, Scarborough J, Campbell SR, Budd GT, Shepard D, Stephans K, Videtic GM, Shah C. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Sarcoma Pulmonary Metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:263-270. [PMID: 36914598 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung metastases are the most common form of distant failure for patients diagnosed with sarcoma with metastasectomy considered for some patients with limited metastatic disease and good performance status. Alternatives to surgery such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be considered, though data are limited. We present outcomes after SBRT for sarcoma lung metastases. METHODS Fifty sarcoma patients with 109 lung metastases were treated with SBRT between 2005 and 2021. Outcomes evaluated included local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity including lung pneumonitis/fibrosis, chest wall toxicity, dermatitis, brachial plexus, and esophageal toxicity. Systemic therapy receipt before and after SBRT was recorded. RESULTS SBRT schedules were divided into 3 cohorts: 30 to 34 Gy/1fx (n=10 [20%]), 48 to 50 Gy/4 to 5fx (n=24[48%]), and 60 Gy/5fx (n=16[32%]). With a median follow-up of 19.5 months, 1/3-year LC rates were 96%/88% and 1/3-year OS 77%/50%, respectively. There was no differences between the 3 regimens in terms of LC, OS, or toxicity. Size >4 cm was a predictor of worse LC ( P =0.031) and worse OS ( P = 0.039) on univariate analysis. The primary pattern of failure was new metastases (64%) of which the majority were in the contralateral lung (52%). One-year chemotherapy-free survival was 85%. Overall, 76% of patients did not require chemotherapy initiation or change of chemotherapy regimen after lung SBRT. Toxicity was reported in 16% of patients overall, including 25%, 20%, and 14% in the 30 to 34 Gy/1fx, 48 to 50 Gy/4 to 5fx, and 60 Gy/5fx cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SBRT outcomes for lung metastases from sarcoma demonstrate high rates of LC and are similar with different dose/fractionation regimens. Lung SBRT is associated with prolonged chemotherapy-free survival. Prospective validation of these results is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wafa Asha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - G Thomas Budd
- Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Dale Shepard
- Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Luo Y. The characteristic of stem-related genes with pancreatic carcinoma cell after irradiation. Heliyon 2023; 9:e17074. [PMID: 37484310 PMCID: PMC10361223 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate stem-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and their potential mechanism in pancreatic cancer cells (MIAPaCa-2) exposed to x-ray and proton radiation, as well as how these factors affected the prognosis of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PADC). Methods The stem-related DEGs were screened using the online tool Stemchecker after protons and x-rays were used to irradiate MIAPaCa-2 cells. Analysis was done on the probable processes and prognostic significance of the DEGs in PAC patients. Results Four datasets containing 401 DEGs were filtered, and the stem-related DEGs for each irradiation type indicated a variety of radiobiological characteristics. In pancreatic cancer cells, a number of stem-related DEGs may serve as biomarkers of radiation effects. Patients with pancreatic cancer demonstrated predictive significance for GRB7, B2M, and PMAIP1. Conclusions MIAPaCa-2 cells exposed to x-rays and protons repeatedly displayed heterogeneous expression of stem-related DEGs involved in complex radiosensitivity, radio-resistance, and radio-induced mortality pathways. GRB7 and B2M were considered potential radiation sensitivity indicators for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|