1
|
Pilleron S, Bastiaannet E. Epidemiology of Cancer in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11912-024-01567-w. [PMID: 38963522 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01567-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW What are the prevalence, incidence and mortality rates of cancer among individuals aged 60 or older on a national, regional, and global scale? What factors affect differences in cancer survival between older and younger adults? RECENT FINDINGS The epidemiological literature on cancer in older adults, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and that focusing on the oldest adults, is expanding. These studies consistently show increasing global cancer incidence rates in older populations. Recent research also highlights a widening survival gap between middle-aged and older adults, with the stage at diagnosis being the primary driver. More research is needed to describe the cancer burden in older adults, especially focusing on the oldest population and LMICs, to better understand global healthcare challenges. Additionally, further exploring patient-related, clinical, and tumour-related factors which drive age-related survival differences could improve cancer outcomes in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Pilleron
- Ageing, Cancer, and Disparities Research Unit, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 1 A-B, Rue Thomas Edison, 1445, Strassen, Luxembourg.
| | - Esther Bastiaannet
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, CH-8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang H, Yao Z, Kang K, Zhou L, Xiu W, Sun J, Xie C, Yu M, Li Y, Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Lin G, Pan X, Wu Y, Luo R, Wang L, Tang M, Liao S, Zhu J, Zhou X, Zhang X, Xu Y, Liu Y, Peng F, Wang J, Xiang L, Yin L, Deng L, Huang M, Gong Y, Zou B, Wang H, Wu L, Yuan Z, Bi N, Fan M, Xu Y, Tong R, Yi L, Gan L, Xue J, Mo X, Chen C, Na F, Lu Y. Preclinical study and phase II trial of adapting low-dose radiotherapy to immunotherapy in small cell lung cancer. MED 2024:S2666-6340(24)00248-4. [PMID: 38964333 DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provide modest but unsatisfactory benefits for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Developing strategies for treating ES-SCLC is critical. METHODS We preliminarily explored the outcomes of salvage low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) plus ICI on refractory SCLC patients. Next, we evaluated the combinational efficacy in murine SCLC. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) was analyzed for mechanistic study. Subsequently, we conducted a multicenter, prospective phase II trial that administered concurrent thoracic LDRT plus chemoimmunotherapy to treatment-naive ES-SCLC patients (MATCH trial, NCT04622228). The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR), and the key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. FINDINGS Fifteen refractory SCLC patients treated with LDRT plus ICI were retrospectively reviewed. The ORR was 73.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.9-92.2). We identified a specific dose of LDRT (15 Gy/5 fractions) that exhibited growth retardation and improved survival in murine SCLC when combined with ICIs. This combination recruited a special T cell population, TCF1+ PD-1+ CD8+ stem-like T cells, from tumor-draining lymph nodes into the TIME. The MATCH trial showed a confirmed ORR of 87.5% (95% CI, 75.9-94.8). The median PFS was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.4-9.3). CONCLUSIONS These findings verified that LDRT plus chemoimmunotherapy was safe, feasible, and effective for ES-SCLC, warranting further investigation. FUNDING This research was funded by West China Hospital (no. ZYJC21003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 82073336), and the MATCH trial was fully funded by Roche (China) Holding Ltd. (RCHL) and Shanghai Roche Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (SRPL).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhuoran Yao
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Kai Kang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lin Zhou
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Weigang Xiu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jianguo Sun
- Cancer Institute, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Conghua Xie
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Min Yu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yanying Li
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Center of Lung Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yue Zheng
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Guo Lin
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiangyu Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yijun Wu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ren Luo
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Laduona Wang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Min Tang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Shuangsi Liao
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiang Zhu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaojuan Zhou
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xuanwei Zhang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yong Xu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yongmei Liu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Feng Peng
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jin Wang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lisha Xiang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Limei Yin
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Health Management & Institute of Health Management, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Lei Deng
- University of Washington School of Medicine/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Meijuan Huang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Youling Gong
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bingwen Zou
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Lin Wu
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Min Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaping Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruizhan Tong
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Linglu Yi
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lu Gan
- Research Laboratory of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jianxin Xue
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xianming Mo
- Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chong Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Feifei Na
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - You Lu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grau C, Dasu A, Troost EGC, Haustermans K, Weber DC, Langendijk JA, Gregoire V, Orlandi E, Thariat J, Journy N, Chaikh A, Isambert A, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Vaniqui A, Vitek P, Kopec R, Fijten R, Luetgendorf-Caucig C, Olko P. Towards a European prospective data registry for particle therapy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 196:110293. [PMID: 38653379 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
The evidence for the value of particle therapy (PT) is still sparse. While randomized trials remain a cornerstone for robust comparisons with photon-based radiotherapy, data registries collecting real-world data can play a crucial role in building evidence for new developments. This Perspective describes how the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) is actively working on establishing a prospective data registry encompassing all patients undergoing PT in European centers. Several obstacles and hurdles are discussed, for instance harmonization of nomenclature and structure of technical and dosimetric data and data protection issues. A preferred approach is the adoption of a federated data registry model with transparent and agile governance to meet European requirements for data protection, transfer, and processing. Funding of the registry, especially for operation after the initial setup process, remains a major challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cai Grau
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Damien C Weber
- Proton Therapy Center, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Ester Orlandi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, F-14000, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Neige Journy
- National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Abdulhamid Chaikh
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire IRSN/PSE-SANTE/SER/UEM, France.
| | - Aurelie Isambert
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire IRSN/PSE-SANTE/SER/UEM, France.
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Dept. of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Ana Vaniqui
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
| | - Pavel Vitek
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Renata Kopec
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland.
| | - Rianne Fijten
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Pawel Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sallam M, Mohammadi M, Sainsbury F, Nguyen NT, Kimizuka N, Muyldermans S, Benešová-Schäfer M. Bibliometric and scientometric analysis of PSMA-targeted radiotheranostics: knowledge mapping and global standing. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1397790. [PMID: 39011478 PMCID: PMC11246987 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1397790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Bibliometric and scientometric analyses provide a structured approach to large amounts of data, enabling the prediction of research theme trends over time, the detection of shifts in the boundaries of disciplines, and the identification of the most productive countries, institutions and scholars. In the context of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotheranostics, no bibliometric or scientometric analysis has been published thus far. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify key contributors to the literature, assess the global scientific production of related research, and possibly predict future development patterns. Methods Scientometrics and bibliometrics were utilized to analyze the current body of knowledge while tracking its evolution to support scientific decision-making comprehensively and systematically. Science mapping techniques were employed to visualize research activities. Two different tools, Tableau and VOSviewer, were utilized, with VOSviewer being deemed the most suitable for the research objectives. The Web of Science (WoS) was used as the principal database for the searches. Results Through the search process over a period of 30 years (January 1993-January 2023), 694 original studies in the English language were subjected to comprehensive analysis. By employing bibliometric and scientometric methods, multiple networks were created that mapped various concepts, such as publication trends, leading countries, cocitations, coauthorship among researchers and scientists, as well as coauthorship among organizations and funding agencies. This study revealed the evolutionary patterns, trends, outliers, and key players in the PSMA field, which enabled a more nuanced understanding of the research landscape. Conclusion This research contributes to the enrichment of knowledge on PSMA-targeted radiotheranostics through detailed global bibliometric and scientometric analyses. It stresses the necessity for the development of communication platforms, the establishment of supportive infrastructures, and the implementation of proactive solutions to address emerging challenges. This study offers a significant resource for delineating effective strategies and identifying prominent funding bodies essential for continuous advancements in the field of PSMA-based diagnosis and therapy for prostate cancer. It is vital to sustain this momentum to ensure further progress in this pioneering area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Sallam
- Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre (QMNC), Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
- School of Environment and Science (ESC), Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
- Griffith Institute for Drug Discovery (GRIDD), Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| | - Mahan Mohammadi
- Centre for Environment and Population Health (CEPH), School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Frank Sainsbury
- School of Environment and Science (ESC), Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
- Griffith Institute for Drug Discovery (GRIDD), Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| | - Nam-Trung Nguyen
- Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre (QMNC), Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| | - Nobuo Kimizuka
- Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
- Center for Molecular Systems (CMS), Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
- Research Center for Negative Emissions Technologies (K-NETs), Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Serge Muyldermans
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology (CMIM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martina Benešová-Schäfer
- Research Group Molecular Biology of Systemic Radiotherapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gaitán-Duarte H. De novo development of Clinical Practice Guidelines or adaptation of high-quality international Guidelines. When and how. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE OBSTETRICIA Y GINECOLOGIA 2024; 75:4233. [PMID: 39013197 PMCID: PMC11208014 DOI: 10.18597/rcog.4233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
|
6
|
Pasquier D, Lacornerie T. Reply to Nikolaos Grivas, Christos Zampaftis, Dimitris Ermidis, Ioannis Leotsakos, Ioannis Katafigiotis, and Markos Karavitakis's Letter to the Editor re: David Pasquier, Thomas Lacornerie, Stéphane Supiot, et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Salvage Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Patients with Intraprostatic Tumor Recurrence After Previous External Radiation Therapy: Phase 1 Results from the GETUG-AFU 31 Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2023;6:399-405. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:641. [PMID: 38042746 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, University of Lille, Lille, France.
| | - Thomas Lacornerie
- Département de Physique Médicale, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Takanashi Y, Kahyo T, Sekihara K, Kawase A, Setou M, Funai K. Prognostic potential of lipid profiling in cancer patients: a systematic review of mass spectrometry-based studies. Lipids Health Dis 2024; 23:154. [PMID: 38796445 PMCID: PMC11128116 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-024-02121-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer prognosis remains a critical clinical challenge. Lipidomic analysis via mass spectrometry (MS) offers the potential for objective prognostic prediction, leveraging the distinct lipid profiles of cancer patient-derived specimens. This review aims to systematically summarize the application of MS-based lipidomic analysis in prognostic prediction for cancer patients. Our systematic review summarized 38 studies from the past decade that attempted prognostic prediction of cancer patients through lipidomics. Commonly analyzed cancers included colorectal, prostate, and breast cancers. Liquid (serum and urine) and tissue samples were equally used, with liquid chromatography-tandem MS being the most common analytical platform. The most frequently evaluated prognostic outcomes were overall survival, stage, and recurrence. Thirty-eight lipid markers (including phosphatidylcholine, ceramide, triglyceride, lysophosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, phosphatidylethanolamine, diacylglycerol, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, lysophosphatidylethanolamine, lysophosphatidic acid, dihydroceramide, prostaglandin, sphingosine-1-phosphate, phosphatidylinosito, fatty acid, glucosylceramide and lactosylceramide) were identified as prognostic factors, demonstrating potential for clinical application. In conclusion, the potential for developing lipidomics in cancer prognostic prediction was demonstrated. However, the field is still nascent, necessitating future studies for validating and establishing lipid markers as reliable prognostic tools in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Takanashi
- First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo- ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.
| | - Tomoaki Kahyo
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi Ward, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan
- International Mass Imaging Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Keigo Sekihara
- First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo- ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Akikazu Kawase
- First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo- ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Mitsutoshi Setou
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi Ward, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan
- International Mass Imaging Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan
- Department of Systems Molecular Anatomy, Institute for Medical Photonics Research, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Funai
- First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo- ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brown SR, Vomhof-DeKrey EE. Current Immunotherapy Treatments of Primary Breast Cancer Subtypes. Biomedicines 2024; 12:895. [PMID: 38672249 PMCID: PMC11048522 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer receives the most funding when compared to any other cancer type, according to a global study conducted by The Lancet. Nevertheless, this malignancy remains the most diagnosed cancer among women and relies heavily on a neoadjuvant treatment regimen of chemotherapy and targeted therapy. After standard treatment, 25-30% of breast cancer patients still develop disease recurrence and must undergo cytoreductive debulking surgery followed by intensive chemotherapy. An array of targeted therapies are currently being utilized and developed to alleviate negative side effects, eradicate cancer growth, and diminish disease recurrence. Immunotherapy is a promising cancer therapy that upregulates one's immune system to stimulate a therapeutic effect and is utilized for cancer management among other ailments such as immunodeficiencies, hypersensitivity reactions, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory disorders, tissue and organ transplantation, and infectious diseases. This review highlights the five primary subtypes of breast cancer, provides a brief history of immunotherapy, evaluates the current landscape of treating breast cancer with immunotherapy, analyzes selected ongoing or recently completed immunotherapy clinical trials for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer, and examines future trends for the treatment of breast cancer with immunotherapeutic techniques. This review provides a formal summary categorized by breast cancer subtype rather than types of immunotherapeutic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savannah R. Brown
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and the Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA;
| | - Emilie E. Vomhof-DeKrey
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and the Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA;
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and the Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine and the Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Al Sukhun SA, Vanderpuye V, Taylor C, Ibraheem AF, Wiernik Rodriguez A, Asirwa FC, Francisco M, Moushey A. Global Equity in Clinical Trials: An ASCO Policy Statement. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2400015. [PMID: 38484198 PMCID: PMC10954071 DOI: 10.1200/go.24.00015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
ASCO is a global professional society representing more than 50,000 physicians, other health care professionals, and advocates in over 100 countries specializing in cancer treatment, diagnosis, prevention, and advocacy. ASCO strives, through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality of patient care, to create a world where cancer is prevented or cured, and every survivor is healthy. In this pursuit, health equity remains the guiding institutional principle that applies to all its activities across the cancer care continuum. This ASCO policy statement emphasizes the urgent need for global equity in clinical trials, aiming to enhance access and representation in cancer research as it not only improves cancer outcomes but also upholds principles of fairness and justice in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Verna Vanderpuye
- National Center for Radiotherapy Ghana, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | | | | | - Andres Wiernik Rodriguez
- Grupo Montecristo Healthcare Division, San José, Escazu, Costa Rica
- Hospital Metropolitano, San José, Costa Rica
- Metropolitano Research Institute, San José, Costa Rica
| | - Fredrick Chite Asirwa
- International Cancer Institute, Kenya International Cancer Institute | ICI, Eldoret, Kenya
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brooks C, Miles E, Hoskin PJ. Radiotherapy trial quality assurance processes: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e104-e113. [PMID: 38423056 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00625-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Quality assurance remains a neglected component of many trials, particularly for technical interventions, such as surgery and radiotherapy, for which quality of treatment is an important component in defining outcomes. We aimed to evaluate evidence for the processes used in radiotherapy quality assurance of clinical trials. A systematic review was undertaken focusing on use of a pre-trial outlining benchmark case and subsequent on-trial individual case reviews of outlining for recruited patients. These pre-trial and on-trial checks are used to ensure consistency and standardisation of treatment for each patient recruited to the trial by confirming protocol compliance. Non-adherence to the trial protocol has been shown to have a negative effect on trial outcomes. 29 studies published between January, 2000, and December, 2022, were identified that reported on either outlining benchmark case results or outlining individual case review results, or both. The trials identified varied in their use of radiotherapy quality assurance practices and reporting of outcomes was inconsistent. Deviations from trial protocols were frequent, particularly regarding outlining. Studies correlating benchmark case results with on-trial individual case reviews provided mixed results, meaning firm conclusions could not be drawn regarding the influence of the pre-trial benchmark case on subsequent on-trial performance. The optimal radiotherapy quality assurance processes were unclear, and there was little evidence available. Improved reporting of outcomes from radiotherapy quality assurance programmes is needed to develop an evidence base for the optimal approach to radiotherapy quality assurance in trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Brooks
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), National Institute for Health and Care Research, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
| | - Elizabeth Miles
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), National Institute for Health and Care Research, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Peter J Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hamilton DG, Page MJ, Everitt S, Fraser H, Fidler F. Cancer researchers' experiences with and perceptions of research data sharing: Results of a cross-sectional survey. Account Res 2024:1-28. [PMID: 38299475 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2308606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite wide recognition of the benefits of sharing research data, public availability rates have not increased substantially in oncology or medicine more broadly over the last decade. METHODS We surveyed 285 cancer researchers to determine their prior experience with sharing data and views on known drivers and inhibitors. RESULTS We found that 45% of respondents had shared some data from their most recent empirical publication, with respondents who typically studied non-human research participants, or routinely worked with human genomic data, more likely to share than those who did not. A third of respondents added that they had previously shared data privately, with 74% indicating that doing so had also led to authorship opportunities or future collaborations for them. Journal and funder policies were reported to be the biggest general drivers toward sharing, whereas commercial interests, agreements with industrial sponsors and institutional policies were the biggest prohibitors. We show that researchers' decisions about whether to share data are also likely to be influenced by participants' desires. CONCLUSIONS Our survey suggests that increased promotion and support by research institutions, alongside greater championing of data sharing by journals and funders, may motivate more researchers in oncology to share their data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Hamilton
- MetaMelb Research Group, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew J Page
- Methods in Evidence Synthesis Unit, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarah Everitt
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hannah Fraser
- MetaMelb Research Group, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fiona Fidler
- MetaMelb Research Group, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- School of History & Philosophy of Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Ahmadsei M, Christ SM, Heusel AE, Kamal S, Kroese TE, Looman EL, Reichl S, Vlaskou Badra E, von der Grün J, Willmann J, Tanadini-Lang S, Mayinger M. Potential of ChatGPT in facilitating research in radiation oncology? Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109894. [PMID: 37659658 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the potential of the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot ChatGPT in supporting young clinical scientists with scientific tasks in radio oncological research. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven scientific tasks were to be completed in 3 h by 8 radiation oncologists with different scientific experience working at a university hospital: creation of a scientific synopsis, creation of a research question and corresponding clinical trial hypotheses, writing of the first paragraph of a manuscript introduction, clinical trial sample size calculation, and clinical data analyses (multivariate analysis, boxplot and survival curve). No participant had prior experience with an AI chatbot. All participants were instructed in ChatGPT v3.5 and its use was provided for all tasks. Answers were scored independently by two blinded experts. The subjective value of ChatGPT was rated by each participant. Data were analyzed with regression-, t-test and Spearman correlation (p < 0.05). RESULTS Participants completed tasks 1-3 with an average score of 50% and 4-7 with 56%. Scientific experience, number of original publications and of first/last authorships showed a positive correlation with overall scoring (p = 0.01-0.04). Participants with little to moderate scientific experience scored ChatGPT to be more helpful in solving tasks 4-7 compared to more experienced participants (p = 0.04), with simultaneously presenting lower scorings (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS ChatGPT did not compensate for differences in scientific experience of young clinical scientists, with less experienced researchers believing false AI-generated scientific results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maiwand Ahmadsei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Matthias Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Astrid Elisabeth Heusel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sandeep Kamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tiuri Ewout Kroese
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Esmée Lauren Looman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sabrina Reichl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eugenia Vlaskou Badra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Willmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Feliciano KT, Lindo UCDP, Tanedo ANP, Gaspar DCA, Cortez JBS. Cancer research funding and care in the Philippines: gaps and ways forward. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e360. [PMID: 37657475 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00356-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina T Feliciano
- St Luke's Medical Center College of Medicine-William H Quasha Memorial, Quezon City 1112, Philippines
| | | | | | | | - Jake Bryan S Cortez
- Department of Preventive and Community Medicine, St Luke's Medical Center-William H Quasha Memorial, Quezon City 1112, Philippines.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Morbiato L, Quaggia C, Menilli L, Dalla Torre C, Barbon A, De Zotti M. Synthesis, Conformational Analysis and Antitumor Activity of the Naturally Occurring Antimicrobial Medium-Length Peptaibol Pentadecaibin and Spin-Labeled Analogs Thereof. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13396. [PMID: 37686199 PMCID: PMC10487733 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Peptaibols are proteolysis-resistant, membrane-active peptides. Their remarkably stable helical 3D-structures are key for their bioactivity. They can insert themselves into the lipid bilayer as barrel staves, or lay on its surface like carpets, depending on both their length and the thickness of the lipid bilayer. Medium-length peptaibols are of particular interest for studying the peptide-membrane interaction because their length allows them to adopt either orientation as a function of the membrane thickness, which, in turn, might even result in an enhanced selectivity. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is the election technique used to this aim, but it requires the synthesis of spin-labeled medium-length peptaibols, which, in turn, is hampered by the poor reactivity of the Cα-tetrasubstituted residues featured in their sequences. After several years of trial and error, we are now able to give state-of-the-art advice for a successful synthesis of nitroxide-containing peptaibols, avoiding deleted sequences, side reactions and difficult purification steps. Herein, we describe our strategy and itsapplication to the synthesis of spin-labeled analogs of the recently discovered, natural, medium-length peptaibol pentadecaibin. We studied the antitumor activity of pentadecaibin and its analogs, finding potent cytotoxicity against human triple-negative breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Finally, our analysis of the peptide conformational preferences and membrane interaction proved that pentadecaibinspin-labeling does not alter the biological features of the native sequence and is suitable for further EPR studies. The nitroxide-containing pentadecaibins, and their synthetic strategy described herein, will help to shed light on the mechanism of the peptide-membrane interaction of medium-length peptaibols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Morbiato
- Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy; (L.M.); (C.Q.); (C.D.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Celeste Quaggia
- Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy; (L.M.); (C.Q.); (C.D.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Menilli
- Department of Biology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy;
| | - Chiara Dalla Torre
- Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy; (L.M.); (C.Q.); (C.D.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Antonio Barbon
- Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy; (L.M.); (C.Q.); (C.D.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Marta De Zotti
- Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy; (L.M.); (C.Q.); (C.D.T.); (A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|