Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib plus placebo for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (LEAP-002): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Therapeutic Sequences of Systemic Therapy After Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-World Analysis of the IMMUreal Cohort

BACKGROUND

The introduction of several new systemic therapies in recent years has significantly altered the treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, while the approval of the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab as the preferred first-line therapy over sorafenib represents progress, it has also raised uncertainties regarding optimal treatment sequencing for advanced disease.

AIMS

This study evaluates the sequential treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma following therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab, providing evidence from a prospective real-world cohort.

METHODS

Data were derived from the ongoing IMMUreal cohort, which investigates immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma across two tertiary centres in Bavaria. A total of 124 patients treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab as first-line therapy between June 2020 and December 2023 were analysed. Feasibility, treatment patterns, and outcomes of sequential therapy were assessed, with a focus on defined prognostic subgroups.

RESULTS

The median overall survival under real-world conditions was 19.8 months. Less than half of the patients (41.2%) proceeded to second-line therapy, and only 19.2% were eligible for third-line treatment. This decline in treatment eligibility corresponded to a marked reduction in therapy duration and progressive deterioration in liver function, as indicated by Albumin-Bilirubin and Child-Pugh scores. While patients with worse baseline liver function, such as patients with Child-Pugh B or ALBI > 1, had a significantly lower probability of transitioning to 2nd line therapy, no significant association was found between the number of treatment lines and factors such as liver cirrhosis, poor physical condition, extrahepatic disease, or macrovascular invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential therapy following atezolizumab and bevacizumab is feasible only for selected patients. However, preserving liver function seems crucial to optimising multi-line therapy and improving outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Outcome and management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who achieved a complete response to immunotherapy-based systemic therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The outcome of patients with HCC who achieved complete response (CR) to immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based systemic therapies is unclear.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Retrospective study of patients with HCC who had CR according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (CR-mRECIST) to ICI-based systemic therapies from 28 centers in Asia, Europe, and the United States. Of 3933 patients with HCC treated with ICI-based noncurative systemic therapies, 174 (4.4%) achieved CR-mRECIST, and 97 (2.5%) had CR according to RECISTv1.1 (CR-RECISTv1.1) as well. The mean age of the total cohort (male, 85%; Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer-C, 70%) was 65.9±9.8 years. The majority (83%) received ICI-based combination therapies. Median follow-up was 32.2 (95% CI: 29.9-34.4) months. One- and 3-year overall survival rates were 98% and 86%. One- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were excellent in patients with CR-mRECIST-only and CR-RECISTv1.1 (78% and 55%; 70% and 42%). Among patients who discontinued ICIs for reasons other than recurrence, those who received immunotherapy for ≥6 months after the first mRECIST CR had a longer recurrence-free survival than those who discontinued immunotherapy earlier ( p =0.008). Of 9 patients who underwent curative surgical conversion therapy, 8 (89%) had pathological CR (CR-RECISTv1.1, n= 2/2; CR-mRECIST-only, n= 6/7).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients with CR-mRECIST-only and CR-RECISTv1.1 were excellent, and 6 of 7 patients with CR-mRECIST-only who underwent surgical conversion therapy had pathological CR. Despite potential limitations, these findings support the use of mRECIST in the context of immunotherapy for clinical decision-making. When considering ICI discontinuation, treatment for at least 6 months beyond CR seems advisable.

Immunosenescence and immunotherapy in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer, more specifically hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is a global health issue and one of the dominant causes of cancer death around the world. In the past few decades, remarkable advances have been achieved in the systemic therapy of HCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a therapy mainstay for advanced HCC and have shown promise in the neoadjuvant therapy before resection. Despite these significant advancements, the compositions and functions of the immune system occur various alterations with age, called "immunosenescence", which may affect the antitumor effects and safety of ICIs, thus raising concerns that immunosenescence may impair elderly patients' response to ICIs. Therefore, it is important to learn more about the immunosenescence characteristics of elderly patients. However, the real-world elderly HCC patients may be not accurately represented by the elderly patients included in the clinical trials, affecting the generalizability of the efficacy and safety profiles from the clinical trials to the real-world elderly patients. This review summarizes the characteristics of immunosenescence and its influence on HCC progression and immunotherapy efficacy as well as provides the latest progress in ICIs available for HCC and discusses their treatment efficacy and safety on elderly patients. In the future, more studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms of immunosenescence in HCC, and to find sensitive screening tools or biomarkers to identify the patients who may benefit from ICIs.

Targeting LIF With Cyclovirobuxine D to Suppress Tumor Progression via LIF/p38MAPK/p62-Modulated Mitophagy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) exerts an oncogenic function in several types of cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, small-molecule inhibitors of LIF haven't been established. Here, we identified that LIF was remarkably overexpressed in HCC by multi-omics approaches, indicating that inhibition of LIF would be a promising therapeutic strategy. Inhibiting LIF could suppress proliferation and metastasis by activating p38MAPK/p62-modulated mitophagy. Interestingly, we found that the natural small-molecule Cyclovirobuxine-D (CVB-D), was a new inhibitor of cytoplasmic LIF in HCC. We further validated LIF as a potential target of CVB-D through biotin-modified CVB-D-Probe utilizing mass spectrometry. Mechanistically, we showed that CVB-D could bind to LIF at Val145, thereby inducing mitophagy, accompanied by cell cycle arrest and inhibition of invasion and migration. Moreover, we demonstrated that CVB-D had a therapeutic potential by targeting LIF-modulated mitophagy in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, which would elucidate LIF as a druggable target and regulatory mechanisms and exploit CVB-D as the novel small-molecule inhibitor of LIF for future HCC drug discovery.

Anlotinib plus penpulimab versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (APOLLO): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy combinations have revolutionised the therapeutic landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but not all yield a significant overall survival benefit, underscoring the need for novel effective agents. Anlotinib plus penpulimab has demonstrated encouraging activity and safety in a phase 2 study. In this phase 3 trial, we aimed to assess whether the combination of anlotinib plus penpulimab improved survival versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable HCC.

METHODS

APOLLO was a multicentre, open-label, parallel-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 79 centres in China. Patients aged 18-75 years with unresectable HCC, no previous systemic therapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (2:1) to anlotinib (10 mg orally once daily on days 1-14) plus penpulimab (200 mg intravenously on day 1), or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) every 3 weeks. Randomisation was done centrally using block randomisation with a fixed block size of 3 and stratified by the presence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis, α-fetoprotein concentration, and ECOG performance status. Sex (male or female) and ethnicity (Chinese or other) were self-reported. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival assessed by masked independent review committee and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one recorded safety assessment. Final progression-free survival and second interim overall survival analyses are presented. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04344158, and follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

From Aug 11, 2020, to June 20, 2023, 940 patients were screened for inclusion in the trial, 291 were excluded, and 649 were randomly assigned to an intervention (433 were assigned to the anlotinib plus penpulimab group and 216 were assigned to the sorafenib group. 551 (85%) of the 649 patients were male and 98 (15%) were female. All patients were Chinese with a median age of 57 years (IQR 50-65). For the final analysis of progression-free survival (June 5, 2023), 636 patients (424 patients in the anlotinib plus penpulimab group vs 212 patients in the sorafenib group) comprised the intention-to-treat population. For the second interim analysis of overall survival (Jan 29, 2024), 649 patients (433 vs 216) comprised the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 5·5-7·5) for the anlotinib plus penpulimab group and 4·2 months (2·9-7·1) for the sorafenib group for final progression-free survival analysis, and 15·3 months (14·3-17·3) for the anlotinib plus penpulimab group and 14·5 months (11·5-17·0) for the sorafenib group for the second interim overall survival analysis. Median progression-free survival was significantly extended with anlotinib plus penpulimab versus sorafenib (6·9 months [95% CI 5·8-8·0] vs 2·8 months [2·7-4·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·52 [95% CI 0·41-0·66]; p<0·0001). Median overall survival was significantly prolonged with anlotinib plus penpulimab compared with sorafenib (16·5 months [95% CI 14·7-19·0] vs 13·2 months [9·7-16·9]; HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·55-0·87]; p=0·0014). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (75 [17%] patients in the anlotinib plus penpulimab group vs 22 [10%] in the sorafenib group) and decrease in platelet count (39 [9%] vs 13 [6%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 90 (21%) and 19 (9%) patients in the respective groups; treatment-related deaths occurred in one (<1%) patient in the anlotinib plus penpulimab group (upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage) and two (1%) patients in the sorafenib group (hepatic failure and death of unknown cause).

INTERPRETATION

Anlotinib plus penpulimab significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus sorafenib in unresectable HCC and might be a new first-line option. These findings require verification in other regions of the world.

FUNDING

Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group.

The present and the future of immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract cancers

Hepatobiliary malignancies encompass a spectrum of invasive carcinomas arising in the liver [hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), bile ducts [intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC)] and the gallbladder. These malignancies represent a growing global health burden, with rising incidence and mortality rates and their overall prognosis remains poor because many patients present with advanced unresectable disease at diagnosis. In recent years, significant advancements in understanding HCC immunogenicity have reshaped the therapeutic scenario of advanced HCC with the immunotherapy revolutionizing the current HCC treatment landscape and patients' prognosis. Moreover, the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy has recently established a new standard of care first-line treatment for patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs) who had historically few therapeutic options. Currently, immunotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens stand as a valuable and practice-changing options in both HCC and BTC management. The mounting recent evidence supporting immunotherapy's survival benefit demands clinicians to stay updated with a rapidly evolving treatment landscape as well as gain knowledge about patient selection, response rate compared with other systemic treatments and immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) management. A panel of international Experts, comprising hepatologists and oncologists, gathered to explore the challenges in effectively integrating immunotherapy in routine clinical practice. The aim of this review is to present the Experts' insights to inform treatment choice in HCC and BTC with a special emphasis on the role of currently available ICI-based therapies in shifting treatment paradigms and potentially reversing the natural course of these two deadly malignancies.

Bridging Immune Evasion and Vascular Dynamics for Novel Therapeutic Frontiers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the most lethal cancers globally, driven by chronic liver disease and a complex tumor microenvironment (TME). Recent advances in spatial omics, single-cell analyses, and AI-driven digital pathology have shed light on the intricate heterogeneity of HCC, highlighting key roles for immune suppression, angiogenesis, and fibrosis in tumor progression. This review synthesizes current epidemiological trends, noting a shift from viral hepatitis to metabolic syndrome as a primary etiology in Western populations, and elucidates how TME components-such as tumor-associated macrophages, cancer-associated fibroblasts, vascular endothelial cells, and immunosuppressive cytokines-contribute to resistance against conventional therapies. We detail the evolution of immunotherapeutic strategies from monotherapy to combination regimens, including dual immune checkpoint blockade and the integration of antiangiogenic agents. Emerging circulating and tissue-based biomarkers offer promise for enhanced patient stratification and real-time monitoring of treatment responses. Collectively, these innovations herald a paradigm shift toward TME-directed precision oncology in HCC, emphasizing the need for multi-targeted approaches to synergistically modulate interacting cellular constituents and ultimately improve clinical outcomes.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 9DW): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma have a poor prognosis, and treatments with long-term benefits are needed. We report results from the preplanned interim analysis of the CheckMate 9DW trial assessing nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the first-line setting.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma without previous systemic therapy at 163 hospitals and cancer centres across 25 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients had at least one measurable untreated lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, a Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive response technology system to receive nivolumab (1 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) intravenously every 3 weeks for up to four doses, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks or investigator's choice of either oral lenvatinib (8 mg or 12 mg mg daily depending on bodyweight) or oral sorafenib (400 mg twice daily). Randomisation was stratified by aetiology; the presence of macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both; and baseline alpha-fetoprotein concentration. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was assessed in all randomly assigned patients; safety was an exploratory endpoint and was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04039607 (ongoing).

FINDINGS

Between Jan 6, 2020, and Nov 8, 2021, 668 patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=335) or lenvatinib or sorafenib (n=333). Early crossing of the overall survival Kaplan-Meier curves reflected a higher number of deaths during the first 6 months after randomisation with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (hazard ratio 1·65 [95% CI 1·12-2·43]) but was followed by a sustained separation of the curves thereafter in favour of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (0·61 [0·48-0·77]). After a median follow-up of 35·2 months (IQR 31·1-39·9), overall survival was significantly improved with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib (median 23·7 months [95% CI 18·8-29·4] vs 20·6 months [17·5-22·5]; hazard ratio 0·79 [0·65-0·96]; two-sided stratified log-rank p=0·018); respective overall survival rates were 49% (95% CI 44-55) versus 39% (34-45) at 24 months and 38% (32-43) versus 24% (19-30) at 36 months. Overall, 137 (41%) of 332 patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 138 (42%) of 325 patients receiving lenvatinib or sorafenib had grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events. 12 deaths were attributed to treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and three were attributed to treatment with lenvatinib or sorafenib.

INTERPRETATION

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed a significant overall survival benefit versus lenvatinib or sorafenib and manageable safety in patients with previously untreated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. These results support nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line treatment in this setting.

FUNDING

Bristol Myers Squibb.

Toripalimab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HEPATORCH): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Although several PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors combined with antiangiogenic agents have been approved as first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, treatment needs remain unmet given the high incidence and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma and due to factors such as regional approval status, medical insurance restrictions, and cost considerations. In this phase 3 HEPATORCH study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib in patients with previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study in 57 hospitals across mainland China, Taiwan, and Singapore. Using a central interactive web response system, eligible patients aged 18-75 years with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1) through a stratified block randomisation method to receive 240 mg toripalimab (intravenously, once every 3 weeks) plus 15 mg/kg bevacizumab (intravenously, once every 3 weeks) or 400 mg sorafenib (oral, twice daily). Randomisation was stratified by macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread (presence vs absence), ECOG performance status score (0 vs 1), and history of locoregional therapy (yes vs no). The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (assessed by the Independent Review Committee per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1) and overall survival. Efficacy analysis was performed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to a treatment group). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04723004, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 23, 2020, and Jan 21, 2022, 545 patients were screened for study inclusion, of whom 219 did not meet the screening criteria. 326 patients were randomly assigned to receive an intervention: 162 patients were assigned to the toripalimab plus bevacizumab group and 164 were assigned to the sorafenib group, with median age 58·0 years (IQR 50·0-66·0) and 56·0 years (49·0-61·0) years, respectively. All 326 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population and the safety population. 282 (87%) patients were male and 44 (14%) were female. At the primary analysis of progression-free survival (data cutoff Aug 10, 2022), median follow-up was 9·4 months (IQR 7·0-12·0). Toripalimab plus bevacizumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with sorafenib (median 5·8 months [95% CI 4·6-7·2] vs 4·0 months [2·8-4·2]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69 [95% CI 0·53-0·91; p=0·0086). At the final analysis of overall survival (May 31, 2024), median follow-up was 16·4 months (IQR 7·1-29·5). Toripalimab plus bevacizumab significantly improved overall survival compared with sorafenib (median 20·0 months [95% CI 15·3-23·4] vs 14·5 months [11·4-18·8]; HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·58-0·99; p=0·039). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 102 (63%) patients in the toripalimab plus bevacizumab group compared with 100 (61%) in the sorafenib group, and led to discontinuation of treatment in 21 (13·0%) participants in the toripalimab plus bevacizumab group and 20 (12%) participants in the sorafenib group. The incidence of treatment-related fatal adverse events (two [1%] vs one [1%]) was similar between the toripalimab plus bevacizumab and sorafenib groups. The most common (incidence ≥5% in the toripalimab plus bevacizumab group) grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (26 [16%] in the toripalimab plus bevacizumab group vs 19 [12%] in the sorafenib group), thrombocytopenia (16 [10%] vs four [2%]), upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (ten [6%] vs one [1%]), anaemia (nine [6%] vs seven [4%]), and abnormal hepatic function (nine [6%] vs five [3%]). The most common (incidence ≥2% in the toripalimab plus bevacizumab group) serious adverse events were upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (12 [7%] vs one [1%]), abnormal hepatic function (eight [5%] vs five [3%]), ascites (six [4%] vs three [2%]), and gastrointestinal haemorrhage (four [2%] vs three [2%]).

INTERPRETATION

Among patients with previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, toripalimab plus bevacizumab resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than did sorafenib, with an acceptable safety profile. Based on these results, the regimen has been approved for use in China by the National Medical Products Administration.

FUNDING

Shanghai Junshi Biosciences.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Navigating the complexities: challenges and opportunities in conversion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Primary liver cancer ranks as the sixth most prevalent malignant tumor and stands as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, posing a significant threat to public health. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer worldwide. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for achieving radical cure and prolonged survival in HCC patients. Contrary to Western countries, the majority of HCC patients in China present with hepatitis B virus infection and consequent liver cirrhosis, with most cases diagnosed at an intermediate or advanced stage. This complexity results in a poor prognosis. Recent advancements in local therapeutic techniques and the introduction of systemic therapies, including targeted and immunotherapy agents, have provided new avenues for both clinical and basic conversion therapy for advanced HCC. Integrating multi-dimensional local and systemic therapies, multi-modal sequential, and comprehensive multidisciplinary approaches into the management of HCC patients has demonstrated promising conversion success rates. This holistic management strategy involves combining multiple treatment modalities vertically and coordinating various disciplines horizontally. However, significant challenges remain, including the precise selection of patients eligible for conversion therapy, the optimal choice of conversion therapy regimens, and the accurate determination of surgical timing post-conversion therapy. Addressing these challenges is crucial for hepatobiliary surgeons. High-quality, randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to generate robust evidence for clinical practice. This review aims to synthesize the latest research developments both in China and internationally and examines key issues in the realm of HCC conversion therapy.

Mechanical mechanics-reclaiming a new battlefield for chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

In the 21st century, significant breakthroughs have been made in the research of chronic liver disease. New biochemical markers of pathogenicity and corresponding drugs continue to emerge. However, current treatment strategies remain unsatisfactory due to complex pathological changes in the liver, including vascular dysfunction, myofibroblast-like transition, and local tissue necrosis in liver sinusoids. These challenges have created an urgent need for innovative, synergistic treatments. Mechanical mechanics is a growing field, with increasing evidence suggesting that mechanical signals play a role similar to that of biochemical markers. These signals influence response speed, conduction intensity, and functional diversity in regulating cell activities.

AIM OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the three main mechanical characteristics involved in the progression of "liver fibrosis-cirrhosis-hepatocellular carcinoma" and provides an in-depth interpretation of several mechanically-related targets. Finally, current and cutting-edge therapeutic strategies are proposed from a cellular perspective. Despite the many challenges that remain, this review is both relevant and significant.

PP1A Modulates the Efficacy of Lenvatinib Plus ICIs Therapy by Inhibiting Ferroptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by poor prognosis, primarily due to limited therapeutic options and resistance to treatment. Although the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has shown promising potential, the underlying mechanisms remain inadequately understood. Here, serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatase (PP1A) is upregulated in Lenvatinib-resistant HCC cells and correlates with poor prognosis. Functional experiments revealed that PP1A promotes HCC progression both in vitro and in vivo. Transcriptomic analysis and ferroptosis metabolite profiling (e.g., ROS, Fe2⁺, lipid-ROS, and GSH) demonstrated that PP1A inhibits Lenvatinib-induced ferroptosis by dephosphorylating Keap1 at site 104. This disruption of the Keap1-Nrf2 interaction enhances the transcription of ferroptosis-related markers and immune checkpoint PD-L1. Notably, single-cell sequencing and co-culture experiments revealed that PP1A knockdown alleviates T cell exhaustion and immune evasion, thereby improving antitumor immunity. In vivo experiments further demonstrated that PP1A knockdown significantly enhances the efficacy of Lenvatinib-ICIs combination therapy. Overall, our findings highlight PP1A as a critical regulator of ferroptosis and antitumor immunity, suggesting its potential as a predictive biomarker and therapeutic target for improving outcomes in advanced HCC.

Oncogenic Signalling Pathways in Cancer Immunotherapy: Leader or Follower in This Delicate Dance?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a mainstay of treatment in many solid organ malignancies. Alongside this has been the rapid development in the identification and targeting of oncogenic drivers. The presence of alterations in oncogenic drivers not only predicts response to target therapy but can modulate the immune microenvironment and influence response to immunotherapy. Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with targeted agents is an attractive therapeutic option but overlapping toxicity profiles may limit the clinical use of some combinations. In addition, there is growing evidence of shared resistance mechanisms that alter the response to immunotherapy when it is used after targeted therapy. Understanding this complex interaction between oncogenic drivers, targeted therapy and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors is vital for selecting the right treatment, at the right time for the right patient. In this review, we summarise the preclinical and clinical evidence of the influence of four common oncogenic alterations on immune checkpoint inhibitor response, combination therapies, and the presence of shared resistance mechanisms. We highlight the common resistance mechanisms and the need for more randomised trials investigating both combination and sequential therapy.

The Combined Use of Lenvatinib and Locoregional Therapies for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a commonly diagnosed malignancy, with the treatment for transplant-ineligible localized disease traditionally relying on locoregional therapies, such as surgical resection, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Systemic therapy has historically been reserved for advanced, unresectable HCC. However, lenvatinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has recently gained traction as part of a multimodal approach for localized HCC in combination with locoregional treatments. An upfront TACE or TARE can induce tumor hypoxia, leading to the upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes tumor angiogenesis and progression. The rationale for combining lenvatinib with a locoregional therapy is to enhance tumor shrinkage while preserving liver function before a definitive intervention. Clinical trials, such as TACTICS and LAUNCH, have demonstrated improved outcomes with this approach. Additionally, retrospective studies, including those incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, have reported further benefits. This review explores the combination of lenvatinib with various locoregional modalities, including TARE, microwave ablation (MWA), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), highlighting their indications and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we discuss the ongoing and upcoming clinical trials investigating the integration of systemic agents with locoregional therapies for intermediate-stage HCC, including EMERALD-1, EMERALD-3, LEAP-012, and CheckMate 74W.

Pathogenesis and Systemic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Prospects

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the major threats to human health worldwide. The emergence of systemic therapeutic options has greatly improved the prognosis of patients with HCC, particularly those with advanced stages of the disease. In this review, we discussed the pathogenesis of HCC, genetic alterations associated with the development of HCC, and alterations in the tumor immune microenvironment. Then, important indicators and emerging technologies related to the diagnosis of HCC are summarized. Also, we reviewed the major advances in treatments for HCC, offering insights into future prospects for next-generation managements.

Targeting immune checkpoints in hepatocellular carcinoma therapy: toward combination strategies with curative potential

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver cancer characterized by poor immune cell infiltration and a strongly immunosuppressive microenvironment. Traditional treatments have often yielded unsatisfactory outcomes due to the insidious onset of the disease. Encouragingly, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly transformed the approach to HCC treatment. Moreover, combining ICIs with other therapies or novel materials is considered the most promising opportunity in HCC, with some of these combinations already being evaluated in large-scale clinical trials. Unfortunately, most clinical trials fail to meet their endpoints, and the few successful ones also face challenges. This indicates that the potential of ICIs in HCC treatment remains underutilized, prompting a reevaluation of this promising therapy. Therefore, this article provides a review of the role of immune checkpoints in cancer treatment, the research progress of ICIs and their combination application in the treatment of HCC, aiming to open up avenues for the development of safer and more efficient immune checkpoint-related strategies for HCC treatment.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitor versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study with propensity score and coarsened exact matching

PURPOSE

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib (Len) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still needs further confirmation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HAIC combined with Len and ICI (HAIC + Len + ICI) versus Len alone in advanced HCC.

METHODS

A total of 290 patients in Len group and 349 patients in HAIC + Len + ICI group were analysed. Propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), and coarsened exact matching (CEM) analyses were used to balance the bias between two groups. Mediation analysis of treatment type in survival was performed for analysis.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.9 ± 0.2 months in Len group and 9.2 ± 0.5 months in HAIC + Len + ICI group. The HAIC + Len + ICI group demonstrated significantly better PFS than the Len group across the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI 0.43-0.60; P < 0.001). This advantage in PFS was sustained in the PSM, IPTW, and CEM cohorts. HAIC + Len + ICI group also showed better overall survival (OS) than the Len group (HR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.31-0.46; P < 0.001). The OS was also superior in the PSM, IPTW, and CEM cohorts. The objective response rate (ORR) in HAIC + Len + ICI group was twice as high as that in Len group. Further mediation analysis showed tumor response at 3 and 6 months had different mediation effect on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC combined with Len and ICI showed improved better OS and PFS than Len alone. This triple therapy could be considered as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC.

CD96: immunoregulation and its role and prospect in immunotherapy of primary hepatocellular carcinoma

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely used in the treatment of advanced liver cancer. Immune checkpoints are a type of molecules that play an important role in the self-regulation of the immune system. In tumor immunity, their activation by immune checkpoints leads to the inhibition of effector lymphocyte activation or the mediation of cytotoxic T cell dysfunction, resulting in immune escape. These immune checkpoints include programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1, as well as cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and others. Immune checkpoint inhibitors block the interaction between immune checkpoint receptors and ligands, thereby relieving the immune suppression caused by immune checkpoints, and reactivating immune cells to exert antitumor effects. With the continuous progress of immunotherapy research, drugs targeting PDL-1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 have played an important role in clinical treatment. However, some patients still cannot benefit from immunotherapy; therefore, multitarget immunotherapy is an important way to improve the response rate of immunotherapy. CD96 is one of the members of the immunoglobulin superfamily receptors, which mainly functions by regulating natural killer cells and CD8+ T cells, and is expected to become a new generation of immune checkpoints. This article reviews the molecular structure of CD96, its role in tumor immunity, and its application in hepatocellular carcinoma, hoping to provide reference for related research.

Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary liver tumor and is strongly related to underlying liver cirrhosis. Common etiologies include viral hepatitis, elevated alcohol consumption and metabolic diseases, all of which result in liver inflammation and scarring. Previously, systemic therapies for locally advanced or metastatic disease were limited to tyrosine kinase inhibitors with poor efficacy and rare cures. Recent advances have harnessed the power of the immune system to combat disease, resulting in improved outcomes and occasional cures. Here, we describe the recent clinical trials in immunotherapies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma as first- and second-line therapies and in combination with other drug classes.

Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with Lenvatinib versus Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab: A pharmacovigilance study in FDA adverse event reporting system

This study aimed to empirically analyze gastrointestinal adverse events associated with Lenvatinib monotherapy and its combination with Pembrolizumab using FDA FAERS data (January 2015-December 2023), focusing on risk profiles, temporal patterns, and influencing factors. Proportional disproportionality analysis (ROR, PRR, BCPNN, EBGM) evaluated drug-AE associations. Kaplan-Meier curves characterized temporal distributions, while Wilcoxon rank-sum test compared median time-to-onset between regimens. Univariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors. A total of 291 severe gastrointestinal AEs reports were included. The gastrointestinal system had the most positive AE signals in both treatment groups. Perforation events showed strong positive signals in both regimens, while haemorrhage and fistula events were unique positive signals in the lenvatinib monotherapy group. In contrast, colitis and pancreatitis positive signals were more common in the combination therapy group. Most gastrointestinal AEs in both groups occurred within the first month of treatment. The monotherapy group had a significantly shorter median onset time than the combination therapy group (27 days vs. 38 days, P = 0.003). Logistic regression indicated that female sex (OR = 0.195, P = 0.022) and low-dose medication (OR = 0.240, P = 0.049) were independent protective factors for gastrointestinal AEs in the monotherapy group. This first comprehensive comparison reveals distinct gastrointestinal toxicity profiles: monotherapy predisposes to acute bleeding/fistulas, while combination therapy increases delayed tumor-related complications. Intensive monitoring during the first treatment month and gender/dosage-adjusted prevention strategies are recommended. These findings provide evidence-based insights for optimizing safety management of targeted-immunotherapy combinations.

Efficacy and safety of combined targeted therapy and immunotherapy versus targeted monotherapy in older patients with uHCC

Background

The prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among older patients is rising due to the aging population. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of targeted therapy alone versus its combination with immunotherapy in older patients (≥ 65 years old) with unresectable HCC (uHCC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 158 patients aged ≥ 65 diagnosed with uHCC who received targeted therapy alone or in combination with immunotherapy from the CLEAP database between March 2019 and July 2023. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety assessments for adverse events (AEs).

Results

The ORR was 3.6% in the targeted monotherapy group compared to 29.4% in the combination therapy group, while the DCRs were 53.6% and 54.9%, respectively. Survival analysis indicated a median PFS of 7.3 months for monotherapy versus 13.2 months for combination therapy (P = 0.137) and a median OS of 16.0 months versus 20.0 months, respectively (P = 0.140). AEs occurred in 44.6% of the monotherapy group and 58.8% in the combination therapy group, with 20.5% in the combination group withdrawing due to adverse reactions, significantly higher than in monotherapy group.

Conclusion

Among older patients with uHCC, the combination therapy demonstrated higher ORR and longer PFS and OS, although it had higher incidences of AEs and drug withdrawal.

Targeting Metabolism: Innovative Therapies for MASLD Unveiled

The recent introduction of the term metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has highlighted the critical role of metabolism in the disease's pathophysiology. This innovative nomenclature signifies a shift from the previous designation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), emphasizing the condition's progressive nature. Simultaneously, MASLD has become one of the most prevalent liver diseases worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for research to elucidate its etiology and develop effective treatment strategies. This review examines and delineates the revised definition of MASLD, exploring its epidemiology and the pathological changes occurring at various stages of the disease. Additionally, it identifies metabolically relevant targets within MASLD and provides a summary of the latest metabolically targeted drugs under development, including those in clinical and some preclinical stages. The review finishes with a look ahead to the future of targeted therapy for MASLD, with the goal of summarizing and providing fresh ideas and insights.

GPX2 inhibition enhances antitumor efficacy of lenvatinib via promoting immunogenic cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is a distinct subtype of regulatory cell death, and represents a potential mechanism to remodel the tumor microenvironment. Lenvatinib is established as the first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but drug resistance limits its efficiency. Our previous research showed that lenvatinib can inhibit GPX2 expression and induce reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related cell apoptosis in HCC. The present study intends to explore whether lenvatinib can induce ICD and clarify its underlying mechanisms in HCC.

METHODS

Flow cytometry was utilized to detect the expression levels of CRT and CD markers, measure intracellular ROS levels, and assess cell apoptosis. Western blot analysis was employed to determine changes in protein levels, while qRT-PCR analysis was used to quantify alterations in mRNA levels. Subcutaneous allograft tumor models were established to investigate the mechanism of lenvatinib against HCC. Immunohistochemical (IF) staining were used to detect the ratio of CD8+GZMB+ cells.

RESULTS

Herein, we found that HCC cells treated with lenvatinib or si-GPX2 showed increased ICD markers, such as CRT exposure, ATP secretion, and HMGB1 release. Notably, we demonstrated that lenvatinib promoted dendritic cells (DCs) maturation and CD8+ T cells activation, thus inducing HCC cell apoptosis when co-cultured with peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Additionally, we further demonstrated that lenvatinib or GPX2 inhibition triggers endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) in HCC cells, which is mediated by the accumulation of ROS. Our findings indicate that pre-treatment with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine suppressed lenvatinib-induced expression of CRT on the cell membrane, ATP secretion and HMGB1 release, and inhibited lenvatinib-induced cell apoptosis. Furthermore, we also found that ERS inhibitor ISRIB could reverse lenvatinib-induced upregulation of ICD biomarkers. Moreover, we further identified that downregulation of GPX2 enhanced the efficacy of lenvatinib via triggering ERS-mediated ICD in HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study uncovered that lenvatinib could be a potent ICD inducer, which could trigger ERS via increasing ROS levels in HCC cells, which present valuable insights into the mechanism of lenvatinib-induced ICD in HCC cells. Collectively, our findings highlight the significant therapeutic potential of the combination of targeting GPX2 and treatment with lenvatinib for HCC.

Post-treatment adverse events ranking in targeted immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis based on risk probability assessment

BACKGROUND

Despite the rapid evolution of targeted and immunotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a systematic comparison of their adverse event profiles remains limited. This review addresses this critical gap by synthesizing data from 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to prioritize treatment regimens on the basis of safety, thereby guiding clinical decision-making in an era of expanding therapeutic options.

METHODS

Clinical studies focusing on targeted and immunotherapies in HCC patients were chosen from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, which spans from 2008 to 2023. Data processing and evaluation followed PRISMA guidelines, with a random-effects model employed to merge the data. Network models were then developed, with adverse events serving as the primary endpoint for analysis.

RESULTS

A comprehensive review of the relevant literature was conducted, identifying 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing 13 treatment protocols for HCC. This study included a total of 10,760 patients. Adverse events within the same category were initially consolidated, followed by the sequential construction of a network model to assess the risk probabilities associated with different targeted immunotherapy regimens for various adverse events and establish priority rankings.

CONCLUSIONS

Cabozantinib, camrelizumab, and their combination therapy for HCC are associated with a higher incidence of common adverse reactions, whereas durvalumab, lenvatinib, and their combination therapy are less likely to cause common adverse effects.

Comparative efficacy of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab alone against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after lenvatinib failure: a real-world study

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib (TL group) and tislelizumab monotherapy (T group) in patients with stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system after lenvatinib failure, and it analyzed the factors influencing the effectiveness of TL as a second-line treatment. This retrospective analysis involved 51 patients treated at a single center between January 2019 and July 2023. Survival outcomes and tumor responses were compared between the TL and T monotherapy groups. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were identified using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Among patients with BCLC stage C advanced HCC who experienced lenvatinib treatment failure, median PFS was significantly longer in the TL group than in the T group (6.8 months vs. 4.5 months, p = 0.003), and OS was notably extended in the TL group (14.0 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.012). Although the disease control rate (64% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.461) and objective response rate (20% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.202) were numerically higher in the TL group, these differences did not reach significance. Child-Pugh B liver function and tislelizumab monotherapy were independent prognostic factors for poor OS, whereas only tislelizumab monotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for poor PFS, Child-Pugh B was not a prognostic factor for PFS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated the OS benefit of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib in patients with Child-Pugh A liver function (14.0 months vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.013) but not in those with Child-Pugh B liver function (7.7 months vs. 6.1 months, p = 0.225). In the TL group, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were hand-foot skin reaction (32%), hypertension (28%), diarrhea (32%), and hypothyroidism (20%). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 24% of patients in the TL group, and hand-foot skin reaction and diarrhea were the most frequent grade 3 or higher AEs. The incidence of AEs was comparable between the two groups. As a second-line treatment, the combination of tislelizumab and lenvatinib was well tolerated and associated with improved OS and PFS versus tislelizumab alone for patients with advanced HCC, particularly in those with Child-Pugh A liver function.

Targeting TIME in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Mechanisms of drug resistance and treatment strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the predominant form of primary liver cancer. While early-stage HCC can be effectively managed with surgical resection and other interventions, treatment options for advanced HCC are limited. Current systemic treatments for advanced HCC include VEGF-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Sorafenib, Lenvatinib), and the combination therapy of anti PD-1/PD-L1 and anti VEGF (Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab, Camrelizumab plus Rivoceranib). However, the lack of response to these drugs and the emergence of acquired drug resistance significantly impairs their efficacy. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) plays a crucial role in modulating the response to these therapies. Various immune cells and their secreted factors within the TIME play a pivotal role in the emergence of secondary drug resistance in HCC. This article reviews the mechanism of TIME promoting drug resistance, discusses the influence of current systemic HCC treatment drugs on TIME, and evaluates how these TIME changes affect the efficacy of treatment. A deeper understanding of the interaction between TIME and systemic treatment drugs may be beneficial to enhance the treatment effect, mitigate drug resistance of advanced HCC, and ultimately improve the prognosis of patients.

Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with or without anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, in the treatment of advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and European Society for Medical Oncology were systematically searched. The search included publications up to August 31, 2024. Primary outcome measures included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and TRAEs (grade ≥3).

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles were included in this study (927 participants). Following RECIST 1.1, for external radiotherapy combined with ICIs, the ORR and DCR were 56 % (95 % CI 0.48-0.64, I2=65.91 %) and 88 % (95 % CI 0.77-0.96, I2=87.19 %), respectively; for yttrium-90 combined with ICI, they were 31 % (95 %CI 0.20-0.43, I2=0 %) and 73 % (95 %CI 0.48-0.92, I2=75.23 %), respectively. According to CTCAE criteria, for external radiotherapy combined with ICIs, the incidence of TRAEs (all grades) was 95 % (95 % CI 0.89-0.98, I2=70.79 %), and the incidence of TRAEs (grades ≥3) was 35 % (95 % CI 0.23-0.48, I2=87.54 %); for yttrium-90 combined with ICIs, they were 78 % (95 %CI 0.48-0.98, I2=88.15 %) and 22 % (95 %CI 0.04-0.47, I2=83.69 %), respectively. Subgroup analyses indicated that sequential therapy demonstrated a higher DCR than concurrent therapy, while the combination of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, ICIs, and anti-VEGF agents showed improved efficacy but was associated with increased toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy combined with ICI demonstrates substantial efficacy and manageable safety in advanced or unresectable HCC. Sequential therapy may enhance therapeutic effectiveness while reducing TRAEs.

Enhancing antitumor immunity: the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-angiogenic therapy, and macrophage reprogramming

Cancer treatment has long been hindered by the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the mechanisms that tumors employ to evade immune detection. Recently, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-angiogenic therapies has emerged as a promising approach to improve cancer treatment outcomes. This review delves into the role of immunostimulatory molecules and ICIs in enhancing anti-tumor immunity, while also discussing the therapeutic potential of anti-angiogenic strategies in cancer. In particular, we highlight the critical role of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in angiogenesis. Moreover, we explore the potential of macrophage reprogramming to bolster anti-tumor immunity, with a focus on restoring macrophage phagocytic function, modulating hypoxic tumor environments, and targeting cytokines and chemokines that shape immune responses. By examining the underlying mechanisms of combining ICIs with anti-angiogenic therapies, we also review recent clinical trials and discuss the potential of biomarkers to guide and predict treatment efficacy.

Roles of the gut microbiota in hepatocellular carcinoma: from the gut dysbiosis to the intratumoral microbiota

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is closely linked to alterations in the gut microbiota. This dysbiosis is characterized by significant changes in the microbial population, which correlate with the progression of HCC. Gut dysbiosis ultimately promotes HCC development in several ways: it damages the integrity of the gut-vascular barrier (GVB), alters the tumor microenvironment (TME), and even affects the intratumoral microbiota. Subsequently, intratumoral microbiota present a characteristic profile and play an essential role in HCC progression mainly by causing DNA damage, mediating tumor-related signaling pathways, altering the TME, promoting HCC metastasis, or through other mechanisms. Both gut microbiota and intratumoral microbiota have dual effects on HCC progression; a comprehensive understanding of their complex biological roles will provide a theoretical foundation for potential clinical applications in HCC treatment.

Predicting treatment response and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors-based combination therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using a longitudinal CT-based radiomics model: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Identifying effective predictive strategies to assess the response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based combination therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is crucial. This study presents a new longitudinal CT-based radiomics model to predict treatment response and prognosis in advanced HCC patients undergoing ICIs-based combination therapy.

METHODS

Longitudinal CT images were collected before and during the treatment for HCC patients across three institutions from January 2019 to April 2022. A total of 1316 radiomic features were extracted from arterial and portal venous phase abdominal CT images for each patient. A model called Longitudinal Whole-liver CT-based Radiomics (LWCTR) was developed to categorize patients into responders or non-responders using radiomic features and clinical information through support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. The area under the curve (AUC) was used as the performance metric and subsequently applied for risk stratification and prognostic assessment. The Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) method was used to calculate the Shapley value, which explains the contribution of each feature in the SVM model to the prediction.

RESULTS

This study included 395 eligible participants, with a median age of 57 years (IQR 51-66), comprising 344 males and 51 females. The LWCTR model performed well in predicting treatment response, achieving an AUC of 0.883 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.881-0.888) in the training cohort, 0.876 (0.858-0.895) in the internal validation cohort, and 0.875 (0.860-0.887) in the external test cohort. The Rad-Nomo model, integrating the LWCTR model's prediction score (Rad-score) with the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), demonstrated strong prognostic performance. It achieved time-dependent AUC values of 0.902, 0.823, and 0.850 at 1, 2, and 3 years in the internal validation cohort and 0.893, 0.848, and 0.762 at the same intervals in the external test cohort.

CONCLUSION

The proposed LWCTR model performs well in predicting treatment response and prognosis in patients with HCC receiving ICIs-based combination therapy, potentially contributing to personalized and timely treatment decisions.

Immune microenvironment and immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanisms and advances

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in HCC progression, characterized by dynamic interactions between stromal components, immune cells, and tumor cells. Key immune players, including tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), regulatory T cells (Tregs), MDSCs, dendritic cells (DCs), and natural killer (NK) cells, contribute to immune evasion and tumor progression. Recent advances in immunotherapy, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy (ACT), and combination therapies, have shown promise in enhancing anti-tumor responses. Dual ICI combinations, ICIs with molecular targeted drugs, and integration with local treatments or radiotherapy have demonstrated improved outcomes in HCC patients. This review highlights the evolving understanding of the immune microenvironment and the therapeutic potential of immunotherapeutic strategies in HCC management.

Combination locoregional and systemic therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma

Locoregional therapies play a fundamental role in the treatment of patients with early and intermediate and locally advanced hepatocellular carcinomas. With encouraging recent advances in immunotherapy-based systemic therapies, locoregional therapies are being both promoted and challenged by new systemic therapy options. Combined locoregional and systemic therapies might enhance treatment outcomes compared with either option alone. This Series paper summarises the existing data on locoregional and systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma, and discusses evidence from studies investigating their combination with a focus on their synergistic efficacy and safety.

Depth of Radiographic Response as an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients with Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Hepatectomy following Targeted Therapy plus Immunotherapy

Introduction

Surgical resection following systemic therapy is feasible in patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, postoperative tumor recurrence is common after surgery, and the factors affecting this recurrence remain unclear. This study aimed to assess factors influencing postoperative outcomes in patients with initially unresectable HCC undergoing hepatectomy after systemic therapy.

Methods

This study retrospectively enrolled patients with initially unresectable HCC who underwent hepatectomy after targeted therapy plus immunotherapy (with or without locoregional therapy). Multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify the independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Machine learning was used to determine the RFS rates at different intervals for different radiographic responses.

Results

Eighty-one patients who underwent R0 hepatectomy after systemic therapy were included. With a median follow-up of 17.4 (interquartile range: 7.2-22.3) months, median RFS and OS were not reached. Preoperative tumor downstaging and achieving pathological complete response were associated with improved RFS and OS. Multivariate Cox analyses identified radiographic response as an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS. Furthermore, a radiographic response >40% (assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1) or >50% (assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) was associated with a longer RFS (p = 0.006 and 0.003, respectively).

Conclusion

Radiographic response depth was an independent prognostic factor in patients with initially unresectable HCC who underwent hepatectomy following targeted therapy plus immunotherapy, and the response to systemic therapy may be the determining factor for patient prognosis after surgery.

Analysis of treatment benefits and prognostic factors for posttransplant HCC recurrence in a large Euro-American-Asian cohort

Posttransplant HCC recurrence significantly impacts survival, yet its management is challenging due to limited evidence. With recent advancements in HCC treatment, updated data on managing recurrent diseases are needed. In this retrospective study across 6 centers (2000-2022), we employed Cox proportional-hazards regression and log-rank tests to assess survival differences. A prognostic score model was developed to categorize patient survival. The efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors was evaluated through propensity score matching. In our study, 431 of 3349 (14%) patients with HCC who underwent transplantation developed recurrence within a median interval of 18 (IQR: 9-32) months. One hundred forty-seven (34%) underwent curative-intent treatments, 207 (48%) received palliative treatments, and 77 (18%) were given best-supportive care. Patients undergoing curative-intent treatments had better survival from the time of recurrence with a median survival of 45 (95% CI: 36-63) months and 1/3/5-year survival of 90%/56%/43% compared to those receiving noncurative treatments (median: 11 [95% CI: 10-13] mo, 1/3/5-y survival of 46%/10%/7%, log-rank p < 0.001). Patients with recurrence diagnosed in the era 2018-2022 showed improved survival over the previous era (HR 0.64 [95% CI: 0.47-0.86]). Multivariable analysis identified 5 prognostic factors: ineligibility for curative-intent treatment (HR: 3.5 [95% CI: 2.7-4.6]), recurrence within 1 year (HR: 1.7 [95% CI: 1.3-2.1]), poor tumor differentiation (HR: 1.5 [95% CI: 1.1-1.9]), RETREAT score ≥3 (HR: 1.4 [95% CI: 1.1-1.8]), and alpha-fetoprotein at recurrence ≥400 ng/mL (HR: 1.4 [95% CI: 1.1-1.9]). These factors contributed to a prognostic scoring system (0-9) that stratified patients into 3 prognosis groups. Both propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable regression indicated that lenvatinib was not statistically superior to sorafenib in terms of efficacy. Curative-intent treatments should be advocated for patients with posttransplant recurrence whenever possible. Prognostic factors linked to aggressive tumor biology significantly influence survival. Advancements in HCC management have improved survival outcomes over the past 5 years.

What can real-world data teach us about treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma?

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major global health concern, as it is the most common primary liver cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality.

AREAS COVERED

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly shifted the treatment paradigm, offering promising survival outcomes. However, the controlled conditions of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often fail to reflect real-world complexities, emphasizing the necessity for strong real-world evidence (RWE). RWE, in most cases derived from observational studies, provides critical insights into the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of systemic therapies across diverse populations and settings. The authors searched MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Scopus for full-text published articles in any language from the inception to 30 June 2024.This review evaluates RWE on systemic therapies for advanced HCC, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like sorafenib and lenvatinib, ICIs such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, and combination therapies like atezolizumab/bevacizumab and durvalumab/tremelimumab.

EXPERT OPINION

Studies reveal discrepancies in treatment efficacy and adverse event profiles between RCTs and routine clinical practice, underscoring the need for individualized treatment strategies. RWE highlights the influence of liver disease etiology, liver function, and tumor burden on treatment outcomes, guiding therapy selection.

Comparative Outcome Analysis of Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib for Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurs after liver transplantation (LT) in ~17% of patients. We aimed to retrospectively compare the outcomes of patients treated with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for recurrent HCC post-LT.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent HCC post-LT between 2006 and 2019 were included. The impact of sorafenib and lenvatinib treatment for recurrent disease was assessed using survival analysis with an a priori multivariable Cox regression (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] at recurrence, recurrence lesion diameter, single-site versus multisite metastases).

RESULTS

Seven hundred fifty-four patients underwent LT for HCC, of whom 120 (15.9%) developed recurrence. Of these patients, 56 received TKIs: sorafenib (n = 42) or lenvatinib (n = 14). The median age at LT was 60.8 y (interquartile range, 54.0-66.2); 52 (93%) were men and 26 (46%) were within Milan criteria at listing. Baseline characteristics at recurrence were comparable between the 2 groups, including largest tumor diameter ( P  = 0.15), receipt of local therapies before TKI ( P  = 0.33), and single-site recurrence ( P  = 0.75), and time from interventional treatment to start of TKI ( P  = 0.44). The AFP at recurrence was higher in the sorafenib group (95.0 versus 3.0 µg/L, P  < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) after initiation of TKI treatment was longer in the lenvatinib group (15.0 mo [95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-31.5] versus 7.8 mo [95% CI, 4.0-15.4]; P  = 0.02) with a 2.3-fold a priori adjusted effect on OS (adjusted hazard ratio 2.32 [95% CI, 1.03-5.20], P  = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest lenvatinib is a valuable treatment option for patients with HCC recurrence after LT.

Drug resistance in TKI therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Mechanisms and strategies

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are such as sorafenib the first-line therapeutic drugs for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, patients with TKI-resistant advanced liver cancer are insensitive to TKI treatment, resulting in limited survival benefits. This paper comprehensively reviewed the mechanisms underlying TKI resistance in hepatocytes, investigating activation of tumor signaling pathways, epigenetic regulation, tumor microenvironment, and metabolic reprogramming. Based on resistance mechanisms, it also reviews preclinical and clinical studies of drug resistance strategies and summarizes targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy currently in investigational clinical trials. Understanding the interactions and clinical studies of these resistance mechanisms offers new hope for improving and prolonging patient survival.

Lenvatinib-induced pemphigus erythematosus in hepatocellular carcinoma: a unique case report

Adjuvant lenvatinib in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has demonstrated prolonged disease-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients at high risk of recurrence post-resection. Here, we present the case of a 68-year-old woman who developed serious side effects including pemphigus erythematosus (PE) linked to lenvatinib usage. Initially treated for breast cancer with radical surgery in April 2018 followed by adjuvant therapy, she was later diagnosed with liver cancer, initially mistaken for metastatic breast cancer to the liver. Although systemic treatment for advanced breast cancer was received, the tumor continued to progress and required partial removal of the liver after final evaluation. Subsequent pathology revealed hepatocellular carcinoma combined with risk factors for recurrence, prompting adjuvant therapy with TACE and oral lenvatinib. After three weeks of lenvatinib administration, the patient developed a skin rash diagnosed as PE through skin pathology. Treatment involved oral methylprednisolone, intravenous human immune globulin, and supportive care, resulting in a cure within a month. This unique case highlights the importance of further research not only on lenvatinib but also on monitoring and managing adverse reactions associated with targeted drugs to optimize patient safety and treatment outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has grown significantly. However, the therapeutic benefits of ICIs alone are notably modest. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in conjunction with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for patients with advanced or unresectable HCC.

Methods

An extensive search of the literature was performed using databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, capturing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until 16 October 2024. Efficacy was measured by progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Safety was gauged through the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS, along with risk ratios (RRs) for ORR, DCR, and TRAEs, were calculated, each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among studies was quantified using Cochran's Q test, I2 statistics, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs).

Results

This analysis incorporated 4 studies with a total of 2,174 patients. Treatment regimens combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with TKIs significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.694, 95% CI: 0.527-0.914; 95% PI: 0.228-2.114) and ORR (RR = 2.303, 95% CI: 1.360-3.902; 95% PI: 0.408-12.991) compared with first-line monotherapy or TKI monotherapy in the overall population. Subgroup analysis indicated that the improvements in PFS and OS were particularly significant among patients of Asian descent or those with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (all p < 0.05). While the occurrence of any grade TRAEs did not differ significantly between the two groups (RR = 1.016, 95% CI: 0.996-1.036; 95% PI: 0.941-1.097), the incidence of serious (RR = 2.068, 95% CI: 1.328-3.222; 95% PI: 0.487-8.776) and grade ≥3 TRAEs (RR = 1.287, 95% CI: 1.020-1.624; 95% PI: 0.574-2.883) increased in patients treated with the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and TKIs.

Conclusion

This study revealed that combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with TKIs in the treatment of advanced or unresectable HCC leads to superior clinical outcomes compared to first-line monotherapy or TKIs alone, particularly in patients with HBV infection and those of Asian descent. Clinicians are advised to be vigilant regarding the potential for TRAEs in clinical settings.

A real-world study of the efficacy of second-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices after progression on first-line lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor

PURPOSE

The incidence and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma are still high according to National Cancer Center of China. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has become one of the standard regimens for the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, some patients still use lenvatinib in combination with immunotherapy instead of a standard "atezolizumab-bevacizumab" regimen as a lower risk of bleeding in patients with esophagogastric varices. However, there is no evidence for second-line therapy after progression on lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma till now. Herein, we aim to investigate second-line treatment among these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices were admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2019 to December 2023. They were treated with lenvatinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor as first line. The efficacy was conducted according to the RECIST1.1 criteria. The endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (OS), and median progression free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

We identified a total of 225 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices who received first-line lenvatinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor, of whom 33 (14.7%) received second-line therapy. 21 patients (63.6%) were treated with regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor, 6 patients (18.2%) with apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor, 4 patients (12.1%) with bevacizumab plus PD-1 inhibitor, and the remaining 2 patients with regorafenib or sorafenib as monotherapy, respectively. Of the 33 patients, 2 (6.1%) were evaluated as partial response (PR), 16 (48.5%) had stable disease (SD), and 15 (45.4%) experienced progression (PD). The ORR was 6.1%, and the DCR was 54.6%. Median PFS was 4.5 months, median OS was 7.2 months, and the 12-month OS rate was 27.3%. Overall survival follow-up was done in 37 patients without second line treatment whose baseline levels were matched with those of the treatment group. The OS was 7.2 months in second line treatment group versus 3.0 months in control group (p = 0.04). As for different treatments in a second line, The ORR of regorafenib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor was 9.5%, the DCR was 47.6%, the median PFS was 4.2 months, and the median OS was 5.9 months. None of the patients treated with apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor got PR, the DCR was 83.3%, the median PFS was 8.7 months, and the median OS was 9.1 months. None of the patients treated with bevacizumab plus PD-1 inhibitor got PR, the DCR was 25.0%, the median PFS was 2.2 months, and the median OS was 6.0 months.

CONCLUSION

The second-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices after progression on first-line lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor is effective. Regorafenib or apatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor might be the preferred options.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor with or without transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and aims

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based systemic therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with promising efficacy. However, whether the addition of TACE to the combination of ICI and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (ICI+TKI+TACE) is superior to ICI+TKI combination therapy is still not clear. Thus, this study compares the efficacy of ICI+TKI+TACE triple therapy and ICI+TKI doublet therapy in patients with uHCC.

Methods

uHCC patients treated with either ICI+TKI+TACE triple therapy or ICI+TKI doublet therapy were retrospectively recruited between January 2016 and December 2021 at Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital. The patients from ICI+TKI+TACE group and ICI+TKI group were further subjected to propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Post-progression survival (PPS) as well as treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also assessed.

Results

A total of 120 patients were matched. The median PFS was 8.4 months in ICI+TKI+TACE triple therapy group versus 6.6 months in ICI+TKI doublet therapy group (HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.48-1.08; p=0.115). Similar results were obtained in term of OS (26.9 versus 24.2 months, HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51-1.52; p=0.670). The ORR in the triple therapy group was comparable with that in the doublet therapy group (16.6% versus 21.6%, p=0.487). Further subgroup analysis for PFS illustrated that patients without previous locoregional treatment (preLRT) (10.5 versus 3.7 months, HR 0.35 [0.16-0.76]; p=0.009), without previous treatment (10.5 versus 3.5 months, HR 0.34 [0.14-0.81]; p=0.015) or treated with lenvatinib (14.8 versus 6.9 months, HR 0.52 [0.31-0.87]; p=0.013) can significantly benefit from triple therapy compared with doublet therapy. A remarkable interaction between treatment and preLRT (p=0.049) or TKIs-combined (p=0.005) was also detected in term of PFS. Post progression treatment significantly improved PPS in both groups. The incidence of TRAEs was comparable between two groups.

Conclusions

The addition of TACE to ICI+TKI combination therapy did not result in a substantial improvement in efficacy and prognosis of patients. However, in selected uHCC patients (without preLRT or treated with lenvatinib as combination), ICI+TKI+TACE triple therapy may remarkably improve PFS.

Adverse events associated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has emerged as a promising treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the safety profiles of HAIC and its various combination therapies remain to be systematically evaluated.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to November 2024. Studies reporting adverse events (AEs) of HAIC monotherapy or combination therapies in HCC were included. The severity and frequency of AEs were analyzed according to different treatment protocols.

Results

A total of 58 studies (11 prospective, 47 retrospective) were included. HAIC monotherapy demonstrated relatively mild toxicity, primarily affecting hepatobiliary (transaminase elevation 53.2%, hypoalbuminemia 57.2%) and hematological systems (anemia 43.0%, thrombocytopenia 35.2%). HAIC with targeted therapy showed increased adverse events, including characteristic reactions like hand-foot syndrome (48.0%) and hypertension (49.9%). HAIC combined with targeted, and immunotherapy exhibited the highest adverse reaction rates (neutropenia 82.9%, transaminase elevation 97.1%), while HAIC with anti-angiogenic and immunotherapy showed a relatively favorable safety profile. Prospective studies consistently reported higher incidence rates than retrospective studies, suggesting potential underreporting in clinical practice.

Conclusions

Different HAIC-based regimens exhibit distinct safety profiles requiring individualized management approaches. We propose a comprehensive framework for patient selection, monitoring strategies, and AE management. These recommendations aim to optimize treatment outcomes while minimizing adverse impacts on patient quality of life.

Changes in systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predict the prognosis of patients with hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of changes in inflammatory markers in patients with Hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) treated with first-line lenvatinib plus a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor.

METHODS

This study retrospectively included 117 HBV-HCC patients treated with first-line lenvatinib in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor. Independent factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were explored based on baseline indicators and inflammatory markers changes after one treatment cycle.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level ⩾ 400 ng/mL [hazard ratio (HR), 1.69; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-2.58; P = 0.01] was identified as an independent risk factor, platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR) ⩽ 65.43 (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.84; P < 0.01 ) and SII ⩽ 539.47 (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.30-0.96; P = 0.03) were identified as independent protective factors for PFS. Additionally, multivariate analysis demonstrated that AFP ⩾ 400 ng/mL, HBV-HCC patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), and SII > 303.66 were independent risk factors of OS. The patients whose SII had increased after one cycle of treatment showed a poorer PFS (HR 1.61; 95 %CI 1.10-2.37; P = 0.015) and OS (HR 1.76; 95 % CI 1.15-2.70; P = 0.009) than patients whose SII had decreased. The objective response rate (ORR) was higher in the SII-decreased patients (47.5% vs 32.5%, P = 0.11). Mann-Whitney test found a significant difference in therapeutic response between the SII-increased patients and the SII-decreased patients (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

SII can be associated with outcomes in patients with HBV-HCC treated with first-line lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors.

Recent advances in systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis using reconstructed RCT survival data

Background & Aims

Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) was the long-standing first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Following positive results from the TOPAZ-01 and KEYNOTE-966 trials, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy are now the standard of care. We aim to compare the efficacy of first-line therapies for advanced BTCs.

Methods

Our systematic review included studies from five databases focusing on English-language articles published between January 2010 and June 2024. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that featured GemCis in a treatment arm for treatment-naive adults with advanced BTCs. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. We conducted a one-stage meta-analysis using reconstructed survival data, Cox-based models, and restricted mean survival time (RMST).

Results

After screening 8,797 studies, 17 RCTs were selected, involving a total of 4,584 patients. Of these, 2,140 (46.7%) received GemCis. The majority (68.9%) were diagnosed with intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 80% had metastatic disease at the time of treatment. The pooled median OS in the GemCis group was 11.6 months (95% CI 11.3-12.2 months). GemCis plus pembrolizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p <0.001), GemCis plus durvalumab (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p = 0.015), GemCis plus S-1 (HR 0.97 95% CI 0.95-0.99; p <0.001), and GemCis plus nab-paclitaxel (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p <0.001) demonstrated superior OS compared with GemCis alone. These combinations also showed increases in RMST by +1.1, +2.5, +2.8, and +2.1 months, respectively. In terms of progression-free survival, GemCis with ICIs (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78-0.94; p <0.001), GemCis plus S-1 (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.003), and GemCis plus nab-paclitaxel (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p <0.001) also demonstrated superiority, with corresponding RMST increases of +0.7, +1.9, and +2.5 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Despite incremental advancements, a breakthrough in advanced BTC treatment remains elusive. Further improvements in treatment efficacy may require biomarker identification to optimize combinational therapies for better patient selection.

Impact and implications

This study analyzed recent RCTs, including KEYNOTE-966, TOPAZ-1, NIFE, and SWOG 1815, involving 4,584 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. A meta-analysis of 17 treatment arms, using reconstructed survival data, confirmed the modest survival benefit of GemCis plus ICIs, supporting its guideline adoption. The findings, however, highlight the need for biomarker identification and better patient selection.