Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma

Background & Aims

We investigated the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received ICI-based therapies in a previous systemic line.

Methods

In this international, retrospective multicenter study, patients with HCC who received at least two lines of ICI-based therapies (ICI-1, ICI-2) at 14 institutions were eligible. The main outcomes included best overall response and treatment-related adverse events.

Results

Of 994 ICI-treated patients screened, a total of 58 patients (male, n = 41; 71%) with a mean age of 65.0±9.0 years were included. Median systemic treatment lines of ICI-1 and ICI-2 were 1 (range, 1-4) and 3 (range, 2-9), respectively. ICI-based therapies used at ICI-1 and ICI-2 included ICI alone (ICI-1, n = 26, 45%; ICI-2, n = 4, 7%), dual ICI regimens (n = 1, 2%; n = 12, 21%), or ICI combined with targeted therapies/anti-VEGF (n = 31, 53%; n = 42, 72%). Most patients discontinued ICI-1 due to progression (n = 52, 90%). Objective response rate was 22% at ICI-1 and 26% at ICI-2. Responses at ICI-2 were also seen in patients who had progressive disease as best overall response at ICI-1 (n = 11/21; 52%). Median time-to-progression at ICI-1 and ICI-2 was 5.4 (95% CI 3.0-7.7) months and 5.2 (95% CI 3.3-7.0) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 at ICI-1 and ICI-2 were observed in 9 (16%) and 10 (17%) patients, respectively.

Conclusions

ICI rechallenge was safe and resulted in a treatment benefit in a meaningful proportion of patients with HCC. These data provide a rationale for investigating ICI-based regimens in patients who progressed on first-line immunotherapy in prospective trials.

Impact and implications

Therapeutic sequencing after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a challenge as no available second-line treatment options have been studied in immunotherapy-pretreated patients. Particularly, the role of ICI rechallenge in patients with HCC is unclear, as data from prospective trials are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based regimens in patients with HCC pretreated with immunotherapy in a retrospective, international, multicenter study. Our data provide the rationale for prospective trials investigating the role of ICI-based regimens in patients who have progressed on first-line immunotherapy.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Versus Non-Cirrhotic Patients: A Retrospective Study of 483 Patients

Background and Aim: Although cirrhosis is a classical risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its absence does not exclude this risk. We aimed to assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes of cirrhotic HCC (C-HCC) and non-cirrhotic HCC (NC-HCC) patients. Methods: Patients consecutively included in a prospective HCC cohort (University Hospital Bern) were analysed. They were categorised into two groups, based on the basis of histology or combined radiological and laboratory characteristics. Results: 20.4% of patients were NC-HCC. This group was characterized by a higher median age and a higher female prevalence compared to the C-HCC group. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (25.7%) and HBV infection (14.9%) were the main risk factors in this group, whereas alcohol abuse (26%) and HCV (21.6%) in C-HCC, P<0.001. 19.4% of them were diagnosed during a screening programme. Resection was performed in 54.5% of NC HCC patients despite the advanced stage (BCLC stage B and C). No statistically significant difference in survival rate was observed between C and NC-HCC patients (24 months vs. 33.9 months, P=0.162). In multivariate analysis, in the NC-HCC group each unit increase in BMI was associated with mortality while liver transplantation and resection were positively associated with survival. In the C-HCC group, the BCLC stage C was negatively associated with survival while all the therapeutic lines were negative factors for mortality. Conclusion: NC-HCC patients were diagnosed more often outside a screening programme. The patients were older, with a higher female prevalence and despite an advanced stage, were often amenable to surgery.