Assessment of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of tuberculosis with gastric lavage aspirates in children in sub-Saharan Africa: a prospective descriptive study

Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children in tertiary care setting in South India

Xpert MTB/RIF is recommended for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in children. We determined the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in children. The characteristics of children influencing Xpert MTB/RIF positivity were explored. Children aged <15 years with symptoms suggestive of pulmonary TB were prospectively enrolled from 2013 to 2019. Two sputum/early morning gastric aspirate specimens were collected for examination by smear (fluorescence microscopy), Xpert MTB/RIF, and culture [Mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT)/Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium]. Diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF was evaluated using LJ and or MGIT culture positivity as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Stratified analysis was done; P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Of the total 1727 enrolled children, 1674 (97%) with complete results for at least one sputum/gastric aspirate sample were analyzed. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF was 68.5% in sputum and 53.6% in gastric aspirate while the specificity was 99% for both. The sensitivity compared to smear was 68.5% vs. 33.7% (P < .001) and 53.6% vs. 14.5%; (P < .001) in sputum and gastric aspirate, respectively. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF was 23.9% with decision to treat as reference standard. Xpert MTB/RIF positivity was significantly influenced by sex, age, nutritional status, chest X-ray abnormality, TB infection status, and symptoms suggestive of TB. Xpert MTB/RIF as an upfront test compared to smear improves diagnosis of pulmonary TB in children yet the sensitivity is suboptimal. Newer TB diagnostic tools with improved sensitivity is warranted in children.

Diagnostic yield as an important metric for the evaluation of novel tuberculosis tests: rationale and guidance for future research

Better access to tuberculosis testing is a key priority for fighting tuberculosis, the leading cause of infectious disease deaths in people. Despite the roll-out of molecular WHO-recommended rapid diagnostics to replace sputum smear microscopy over the past decade, a large diagnostic gap remains. Of the estimated 10·6 million people who developed tuberculosis globally in 2022, more than 3·1 million were not diagnosed. An exclusive focus on improving tuberculosis test accuracy alone will not be sufficient to close the diagnostic gap for tuberculosis. Diagnostic yield, which we define as the proportion of people in whom a diagnostic test identifies tuberculosis among all people we attempt to test for tuberculosis, is an important metric not adequately explored. Diagnostic yield is particularly relevant for subpopulations unable to produce sputum such as young children, people living with HIV, and people with subclinical tuberculosis. As more accessible non-sputum specimens (eg, urine, oral swabs, saliva, capillary blood, and breath) are being explored for point-of-care tuberculosis testing, the concept of yield will be of growing importance. Using the example of urine lipoarabinomannan testing, we illustrate how even tests with limited sensitivity can diagnose more people with tuberculosis if they enable increased diagnostic yield. Using tongue swab-based molecular tuberculosis testing as another example, we provide definitions and guidance for the design and conduct of pragmatic studies that assess diagnostic yield. Lastly, we show how diagnostic yield and other important test characteristics, such as cost and implementation feasibility, are essential for increased effective population coverage, which is required for optimal clinical care and transmission impact. We are calling for diagnostic yield to be incorporated into tuberculosis test evaluation processes, including the WHO Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations process, providing a crucial real-life implementation metric that complements traditional accuracy measures.

Does multiple gastric aspirate collection increase sensitivity of M. tuberculosis detection in children with pulmonary tuberculosis?

This study aims to investigate the sensitivity of microscopy, culture and polymerase chain reaction on three gastric aspirates (GAs) in the microbiological confirmation of active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and to identify possible changes in sensitivity derived from the collection of a different number of aspirates. Children with clinical and radiological diagnoses of active pulmonary TB who underwent three GAs between March 2007 and June 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical, radiological, and microbiological data were collected. The sensitivity of microbiological tests on GAs was calculated. Moreover, differences in sensitivity according to age and radiological pattern were investigated. Overall, 156 children with active pulmonary TB were enrolled with a median age of 51.5 (IQR: 25.2-113.2) months. Microbiological investigations on the first GA showed a sensitivity of 34% (95%CI 26.7, 42), the cumulative sensitivity of first and second GAs was 40.4% (95%CI 32.7, 48.5) and of the three GAs was 47.4% (95%CI 39.8, 55.2). The collection of three GAs leads to an overall increase in sensitivity of the first GA by 13.4% (95%CI 2.8, 24.1%; p=0.014). Moreover, the increase in sensitivity was significantly higher in children ≤ 4 years of age and in those with uncomplicated TB (p=0.008).Conclusions: Performing a higher number of GAs increases the sensitivity of microbiological confirmation of active pulmonary TB, particularly in children ≤ 4 years and with an uncomplicated radiological pattern. What is known: • The diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis is a challenge for paediatricians • Despite their low sensitivity gastric aspirates represent the standard sample for microbiological confirmation of active pulmonary tuberculosis in children • Most international guidelines recommend performing three sequential gastric aspirates on three consecutive days What is new: • A significant increase in global sensitivity by 13.4% was found by the collection of three gastric aspirates compared to the first one • Performing a higher number of gastric aspirates increases the sensitivity of microbiological confirmation, particularly in children ≤ 4 years and with an uncomplicated radiological pattern.

Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Rifampicin Resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Children and Adolescents using Gene Xpert MTB/RIF Assay in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a global health problem. While childhood TB contributes 10% to the global TB burden, the paucibacillary nature of TB disease in children and the absence of reliable diagnostic methods have made MTB diagnosis in children to be a great challenge. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of MTB and rifampicin-resistant MTB (RR-MTB) among children using Gene Xpert MTB/RIF Assay in Tigray, Ethiopia.

Methods

A retrospective database study was conducted among children in ten governmental hospitals in the Tigray region. Gene Xpert MTB/RIF results of sputum/gastric lavage samples from children with presumptive TB from January 2016 to December 2019 were extracted using a data extraction sheet. Data were collected and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21.

Results

The prevalence of bacteriologically confirmed MTB by Gene-Xpert in children with presumptive TB was 7.3% (95% CI: 6.7%-7.9%) and the proportion of those that were Gene-Xpert MTB positive who also have rifampicin resistance was 10.9% (95% CI: 8.2-13.6%). Older children aged 11-15 years [AOR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.33-2.33, p < 0.001] and adolescents 16-17 years [AOR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.63-2.92, p < 0.001] were more likely to be MTB positive. Relapse cases [AOR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.09-2.51, p = 0.017] and lost/failure cases [AOR = 8.82; 95% CI = 3.94-19.76, p < 0.001] were more likely to have MTB compared to the new cases.

Conclusion

The proportion of MTB-positive among the TB presumptive patients was 7.3%. The proportion of rifampicin-resistant TB to all positive patients was 10.9%. Female participants had more MTB than males (or younger children). The result highlights the need for due attention in children because it is very helpful in determining the future control of the disease.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions to improve diagnosis and preventive therapy for paediatric tuberculosis in 9 sub-Saharan African countries: A modelling study

BACKGROUND

Over 1 million children aged 0 to 14 years were estimated to develop tuberculosis in 2021, resulting in over 200,000 deaths. Practical interventions are urgently needed to improve diagnosis and antituberculosis treatment (ATT) initiation in children aged 0 to 14 years and to increase coverage of tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) in children at high risk of developing tuberculosis disease. The multicountry CaP-TB intervention scaled up facility-based intensified case finding and strengthened household contact management and TPT provision at HIV clinics. To add to the limited health-economic evidence on interventions to improve ATT and TPT in children, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the CaP-TB intervention.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We analysed clinic-level pre/post data to quantify the impact of the CaP-TB intervention on ATT and TPT initiation across 9 sub-Saharan African countries. Data on tuberculosis diagnosis and ATT/TPT initiation counts with corresponding follow-up time were available for 146 sites across the 9 countries prior to and post project implementation, stratified by 0 to 4 and 5 to 14 year age-groups. Preintervention data were retrospectively collected from facility registers for a 12-month period, and intervention data were prospectively collected from December 2018 to June 2021 using project-specific forms. Bayesian generalised linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate country-level rate ratios for tuberculosis diagnosis and ATT/TPT initiation. We analysed project expenditure and cascade data to determine unit costs of intervention components and used mathematical modelling to project health impact, health system costs, and cost-effectiveness. Overall, ATT and TPT initiation increased, with country-level incidence rate ratios varying between 0.8 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 0.7 to 1.0) and 2.9 (95% UI, 2.3 to 3.6) for ATT and between 1.6 (95% UI, 1.5 to 1.8) and 9.8 (95% UI, 8.1 to 11.8) for TPT. We projected that for every 100 children starting either ATT or TPT at baseline, the intervention package translated to between 1 (95% UI, -1 to 3) and 38 (95% UI, 24 to 58) deaths averted, with a median incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$634 per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. ICERs ranged between US$135/DALY averted in Democratic of the Congo and US$6,804/DALY averted in Cameroon. The main limitation of our study is that the impact is based on pre/post comparisons, which could be confounded.

CONCLUSIONS

In most countries, the CaP-TB intervention package improved tuberculosis treatment and prevention services for children aged under 15 years, but large variation in estimated impact and ICERs highlights the importance of local context.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This evaluation is part of the TIPPI study, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03948698).

Comparison of Performances of GeneXpert MTB/RIF, Bactec MGIT 960, and Bactec Myco/F Systems in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Biopsy Tissues: a Retrospective Study

Tuberculosis remains a major global public concern as a leading cause of health care-associated infections. The detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is challenging due to the paucibacillary nature of the pathogen. For suspected pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients, if sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), related samples are negative for MTB, or suspected tumors, biopsy tissues may provide a better diagnostic yield. This study was aimed at comparing the performances of three methods in identifying MTB in biopsy tissues, including the Bactec mycobacterial growth indicator tube 960 (MGIT 960) system, the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (GeneXpert), and the Bactec Myco/F lytic culture (Myco/F) system. Biopsy samples from 3,209 nonduplicated patients were retrospectively enrolled between January 2018 and September 2021, of which 180 (5.6%) were positive for MTB by at least one method. GeneXpert revealed the highest recovery rate (134/162, 82.7%), followed by MGIT 960 (99/135, 73.3%) and Myco/F (26/143, 18.1%), and the composite positive rate for GeneXpert and MGIT 960 was 96.6% (173/179). Pairwise comparisons were conducted after completion of both tests, and the results showed that Myco/F had significantly lower detection rates than GeneXpert and MGIT 960 (16.4% versus 82.8%, P < 0.001; 14.3% versus 71.4%, P < 0.001). In summary, GeneXpert was the most sensitive and recommended method for MTB detection in biopsy tissues, and the combination of GeneXpert and MGIT 960 could improve the overall diagnostic yield. IMPORTANCE Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) poses a severe threat to public health worldwide. The diagnosis of tuberculosis is challenging due to the low load of the microorganism in samples. Biopsy tissues are sometimes collected via invasive procedures with limited size, and additional samples are often inaccessible. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay, Bactec MGIT 960 system, and Bactec Myco/F lytic system have been used in detecting MTB in our laboratory. Here, we evaluated the performances of these three methods in 3,209 biopsy tissues samples to establish a more effective protocol based on clinical requirements. Attempts for a locally optimized protocol should be always made.

Stool Xpert MTB/RIF as a possible diagnostic alternative to sputum in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Worldwide, COVID-19 pandemic lead to a large fall in the number of newly reported TB cases. In sub-Saharan Africa, microbiological diagnosis of TB is generally based on smear microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF on sputum samples, but good quality sputum samples are often difficult to obtain, leading clinicians to rely on more invasive procedures for diagnosis. Aim of this study was to investigate pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF on stool samples compared to respiratory microbiological reference standards in African countries.

Methods

Four investigators independently searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science until 12th October 2022, then screened titles and abstracts of all potentially eligible articles. The authors applied the eligibility criteria, considered the full texts. All the studies reported the data regarding true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP) and false negative (FN). Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed with the Quadas-2 tool.

Results

overall, among 130 papers initially screened, we evaluated 47 works, finally including 13 papers for a total of 2,352 participants, mainly children. The mean percentage of females was 49.6%, whilst the mean percentage of patients reporting HIV was 27.7%. Pooled sensitivity for Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis was 68.2% (95%CI: 61.1-74.7%) even if characterized by a high heterogeneity (I2=53.7%). Specificity was almost 100% (99%, 95%CI: 97-100%; I2 = 45.7%). When divided for reference standard, in the six studies using sputum and nasogastric aspirate the accuracy was optimal (AUC = 0.99, SE = 0.02), whilst in the studies using only sputum for tuberculosis detection the AUC was 0.85 (with a SE = 0.16). The most common source of bias was exclusion of enrolled patients in the analysis.

Conclusions

Our study confirms that, in Africa, stool Xpert MTB/RIF may be a useful rule-in test for children above and below 5 years of age under evaluation for pulmonary tuberculosis. Sensitivity increased substantially when using both sputum and nasogastric aspirate as reference samples.

Expedited diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis using Truenat MTB-Rif Dx and GeneXpert MTB/RIF

Rapid, cost-effective, and sensitive diagnostic assays are essential for global tuberculosis (TB) control, especially in high TB burden, resource-limited settings. The current study was designed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of Truenat MTB-Rif Dx (MolBio) in children less than 18 years of age, with symptoms suggestive of TB. Gastric aspirate, induced sputum, and broncho-alveolar lavage samples were subjected simultaneously to AFB-smear, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, liquid culture (MGIT-960) and Truenat MTB-Rif Dx. The index-test results were evaluated against microbiological reference standards (MRS). Truenat MTB-Rif Dx had a sensitivity of 57.1%, specificity of 92% against MRS. The sensitivity and specificity of the Truenat MTB-RIF Dx compared with liquid culture was 58.7% and 87.5% while GeneXpert MTB/RIF was 56% and 91.4%. The performance of both GeneXpert MTB/RIF and Truenat MTB-Rif Dx are comparable. Result of our study demonstrates that Truenat MTB-Rif can aid in early and efficient diagnosis of TB in children.

Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and culture assays to detect Mycobacterium Tuberculosis using OMNIgene-sputum processed stool among adult TB presumptive patients in Uganda

BACKGROUND

Stool is a potential sample for diagnosing Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in patients with difficulty in expectorating. However, high mycobacterial culture contamination rates and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra test error rates on stool samples have limited its use. OMNIgene SPUTUM (OM-S) is a sample transport reagent with characteristics of sputum decontamination while maintaining viable Mtb. We evaluated the impact of OM-S on Mtb diagnostic yield from stool using smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, and culture among presumptive TB patients.

METHODS

Paired stool and expectorated sputum samples were collected from consecutive Ugandan adults undergoing diagnostic evaluation for pulmonary TB between June 2018 and June 2019. Stool was divided into 2 portions: one was homogenized in OM-S (OM-S stool) and the other in PBS (PBS stool) as control. Both sputum and processed stool were tested for Mtb using concentrated smear fluorescence microscopy (CFM), Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert) and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for each test were calculated against sputum MGIT culture as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Of the 200 participants, 120 (60%) were male, 73 (37%) were HIV positive (median CD4 120 cells/uL (IQR 43-297)) and 128 (64%) had confirmed pulmonary TB by sputum MGIT culture. Seven (4%) OM-S stool Xpert samples reported errors while 47 (25%) and 103 (61%) were contaminated on OM-S stool MGIT and PBS stool MGIT, respectively. OM-S stool MGIT was able to accurately diagnose 56 of the contaminated PBS stool MGIT samples compared to only 5 of the contaminated OM-S stool MGIT samples diagnosed by PBS stool MGIT. Sensitivity (95% Confidence Interval, CI) 89% (83-94) for OM-S stool Xpert was higher compared to that of OM-S stool MGIT 60% (51-69) and PBS stool MGIT 42% (32-52). Specificity (95%CI) 91% (82-97) was also higher for OM-S stool Xpert compared to OM-S stool MGIT 64% (51-75) and PBS stool MGIT 26% (16-38).

CONCLUSION

Stool processed with OM-S showed potential to improve Mtb diagnostic yield and reduce rates of indeterminate results when tested on Xpert and MGIT culture. The method may thus be of value in Mtb detection among patients with difficulty to expectorate.

Efficacy of Xpert in tuberculosis diagnosis based on various specimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) is a diagnostic tool that has been shown to significantly improve the accuracy of tuberculosis (TB) detection in clinical settings, with advanced sensitivity and specificity. Early detection of TB can be challenging, but Xpert has improved the efficacy of the diagnostic process. Nevertheless, the accuracy of Xpert varies according to different diagnostic specimens and TB infection sites. Therefore, the selection of adequate specimens is critical when using Xpert to identify suspected TB. As such, we have conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of Xpert for diagnosis of different TB types using several specimens.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of several electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the World Health Organization clinical trials registry center, covering studies published from Jan 2008 to July 2022. Data were extracted using an adapted version of the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies. Where appropriate, meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models. The risk of bias and level of evidence was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool and a modified version of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. RStudio was utilized to analyze the results, employing the meta4diag, robvis, and metafor packages.

Results

After excluding duplicates, a total of 2163 studies were identified, and ultimately, 144 studies from 107 articles were included in the meta-analysis based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were estimated for various specimens and TB types. In the case of pulmonary TB, Xpert using sputum (0.95 95%CI 0.91-0.98) and gastric juice (0.94 95%CI 0.84-0.99) demonstrated similarly high sensitivity, surpassing other specimen types. Additionally, Xpert exhibited high specificity for detecting TB across all specimen types. For bone and joint TB, Xpert, based on both biopsy and joint fluid specimens, demonstrated high accuracy in TB detection. Furthermore, Xpert effectively detected unclassified extrapulmonary TB and tuberculosis lymphadenitis. However, the Xpert accuracy was not satisfactory to distinguish TB meningitis, tuberculous pleuritis and unclassified TB.

Conclusions

Xpert has exhibited satisfactory diagnostic accuracy for most TB infections, but the efficacy of detection may vary depending on the specimens analyzed. Therefore, selecting appropriate specimens for Xpert analysis is essential, as using inadequate specimens can reduce the ability to distinguish TB.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=370111, identifier CRD42022370111.

Evaluation of GeneXpert and liquid culture for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pediatric patients

PURPOSE

Evaluation of GeneXpert in comparison to liquid culture using Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) as gold standard for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in children.

METHODS

A total of 8123 samples, both pulmonary (5830) and extra pulmonary (2293) received from pediatric patients were processed for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) smear, GeneXpert and MGIT culture simultaneously.

RESULTS

Out of 8123 samples, 493 (6.1%) samples were found positive by GeneXpert and 508 (6.2%) samples by MGIT culture, 371 (4.6%) were found positive by both GeneXpert and MGIT culture. MGIT detected 137 (1.7%) extra positive than GeneXpert while GeneXpert detected 122 (1.5%) extra samples more positive than by MGIT. Sensitivity of GeneXpert was 73% and concordance between both methods was 96.8%. Rifampicin resistance was found in 49 (9.9%) samples among MTB positive by GeneXpert. Turnaround time for GeneXpert was approx. 2 ​h and for MGIT, it was 12-28 days.

CONCLUSION

Good sensitivity (73%) and concordance (96.8%) were observed for GeneXpert against MGIT culture in this study. GeneXpert can simultaneously detect MTB and rifampicin resistance in less than 2 ​h while MGIT takes 12-28 days for MTB detection only.

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra outperformed the Xpert assay in tuberculosis lymphadenitis diagnosis: a prospective head-to-head cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) has shown better sensitivity in comparison with Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) in extra-pulmonary tuberculosis, while the head-to-head comparison of these methods in tuberculosis lymphadenitis had barely been performed.

METHODS

Patients with undiagnosed lymphadenopathy were recruited prospectively and consecutively, and fine-needle aspirates biopsy (FNA) or lymph node tissue was collected. The specimen was subjected to smear, culture, Xpert and Xpert-Ultra assays. Culture and/or smear for AFB or AFB observed on histopathology were performed as a reference.

RESULTS

106 participants were recruited, including 41 confirmed TB, 33 probableTB and 32 non-TB lymphadenopathy. The head-to-head comparison for Mtb detection showed that Xpert-Ultra produced the highest sensitivity when compared with smear, culture and Xpert (75.7% vs. 5.4 %, 13.5% and 48.7%).When Xpert-Ultra outcomes were integrated for diagnosis, the percentage of confirmed TB lymphadenitis case increased from 55.4% (41/74) to 85.1% (63/74). The sensitivities of Xpert-Ultra and Xpert on tissue were 73.6% (95%CI,59.4-84.3) and 39.6% (95%CI,26.8-54.0), respectively. The sensitiviyt of Xpert-Ultra on FNA samples (81.0%,95%CI 57.4-93.7) was higher than that of Xpert (71.4%,95% CI 47.7-87.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Xpert-Ultra detected significantly more TB lymphadenitis cases than Xpert or culture. This superiority was particularly distinct using lymph node tissue than FNA detection.

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and mycobacterial culture in routine clinical care at a paediatric hospital

Background

Microbiological confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in children is a well-documented challenge. This study evaluated Xpert Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (MTB)/Rifampicin (RIF) Ultra (Ultra) and mycobacterial cultures in routine clinical care at a tertiary paediatric hospital.

Methods

Children treated for PTB and who had at least one respiratory specimen investigated by Ultra and mycobacterial culture before tuberculosis (TB) treatment was commenced were included. The findings of this retrospective study were summarised using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results

A total of 174 children were included. The median age was 2.5 years. Microcytic anaemia, airway compression, cavitary disease and miliary TB were significantly observed in children with microbiologically confirmed TB (cTB). Tuberculosis was microbiologically confirmed in 93 (53.4%) children. The positive yield from testing the first respiratory specimens was 68/174 (39.1%) on Ultra and 82/174 (47.1%) on combined Ultra and mycobacterial culture. In the subset of children (n = 70) tested with Ultra on two sequential respiratory specimens, the incremental yield from the second specimen was 30.3%. In the subset of children (n = 16) tested with Ultra on three sequential respiratory specimens, the incremental yield from the second and third specimens was 16.7% and 0.0%, respectively. When Ultra and mycobacterial culture results were combined, the incremental yield in children who had two sequential respiratory specimens tested was 24.4% and 3.1% on Ultra and mycobacterial culture, respectively.

Conclusion

Ultra and mycobacterial culture on a single respiratory specimen resulted in a high microbiological yield. Ultra-testing on a second respiratory specimen increased the yield of microbiologically cTB. Additional diagnostic testing may require further study.

Paediatric tuberculosis diagnosis using Mycobacterium tuberculosis real-time polymerase chain reaction assay: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis (TB) is key to manage the disease and to control and prevent its transmission. Collection of quality sputum samples without invasion methods from paediatrics (age < 16 years) with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains a challenge. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall accuracy of a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assay, for routine diagnosis of MTB in different samples from paediatrics with active pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis using mycobacterial culture as the gold standard in clinical microbiology laboratories.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the diagnostic test accuracy of RT-PCR based assay for the detection of MTB in paediatric clinical samples. A systematic literature search was performed for publications in any language. MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were among 9 bibliographic databases searched from August 2019 until November 2020. Bivariate random-effects model of meta-analysis were performed to generate pooled summary estimates (95% CIs) for overall accuracy of RT-PCR based assay compared to mycobacterial culture as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Of the 1592 candidate studies, twenty-one eligible studies met our inclusion criteria. In total, the review and meta-analysis included 5536 (3209 PTB and 2327 EPTB). Summary estimates for pulmonary TB (11 studies) were as follows: sensitivity 56 (95% CI 51-62), specificity 97 (95% CI 96-98) and summary estimates for extra-pulmonary TB (10 studies) were as follows: sensitivity 87 (95% CI 82-91)) specificity 100 (95% CI 99-100). There was significant heterogeneity in sensitivity and specificity among the enrolled studies (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that the RT-PCR based assay could be a useful test for the diagnosis of paediatrics TB with high sensitivity and specificity in low-income/high-burden and upper medium income/low-burden settings. From the study, RT-PCR assay demonstrated a high degree of sensitivity for extra-pulmonary TB and good sensitivity for pulmonary TB which is an important factor in achieving effective global control and for patient management in terms of initiating early and appropriate anti-tubercular therapy.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018104052.

The clinical diagnostic value of Xpert MTB/RIF for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in gastric aspirates

BACKGROUND

At present, the infection and prevalence rates of tuberculosis (TB) are still high in worldwide. The Xpert MTB/RIF technology has improved the diagnosis speed of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and facilitated the rapid treatment of TB patients.

METHODS

We searched experimental data derived from Xpert MTB/RIF for detecting MTB in gastric aspirates in PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases between January 2012 to April 2019. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC curve) was used to analyze the pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR for determining the accuracy of the test.

RESULTS

Our database search resulted in 10 relevant articles. The pooled sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF for detecting TB in GA was 86% (95% CI, 83-89%), and I2 = 93.4%. The pooled specificity was 92% (95% CI, 90-93%) and I2 = 97.8%. In addition, the positive LR was 12.12 (95% CI, 5.60-26.21), negative LR was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.11-0.36), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 147.04 (95% CI, 37.20-581.19). Using the SROC curve, the AUC was 0.9730 and Q* was 0.9248 (SE = 0.0261). The publication bias was P=0.517 (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Xpert MTB/RIF for detecting MTB in gastric aspirates was highly accurate. In addition, we observed that the publication bias in the present study was low. Hence, the Xpert MTB/RIF technology is highly accurate and has the advantage of rapid testing for MTB in clinical samples.

Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) are World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended rapid tests that simultaneously detect tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in people with signs and symptoms of tuberculosis. This review builds on our recent extensive Cochrane Review of Xpert MTB/RIF accuracy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and detection of rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis. For pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance, we also investigated potential sources of heterogeneity. We also summarized the frequency of Xpert Ultra trace-positive results, and estimated the accuracy of Xpert Ultra after repeat testing in those with trace-positive results.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, the WHO ICTRP, the ISRCTN registry, and ProQuest to 28 January 2020 with no language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included diagnostic accuracy studies using respiratory specimens in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis that directly compared the index tests. For pulmonary tuberculosis detection, the reference standards were culture and a composite reference standard. For rifampicin resistance, the reference standards were culture-based drug susceptibility testing and line probe assays.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data using a standardized form, including data by smear and HIV status. We assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C. We performed meta-analyses comparing pooled sensitivities and specificities, separately for pulmonary tuberculosis detection and rifampicin resistance detection, and separately by reference standard. Most analyses used a bivariate random-effects model. For tuberculosis detection, we estimated accuracy in studies in participants who were not selected based on prior microscopy testing or history of tuberculosis. We performed subgroup analyses by smear status, HIV status, and history of tuberculosis. We summarized Xpert Ultra trace results.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified nine studies (3500 participants): seven had unselected participants (2834 participants). All compared Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis detection; seven studies used a paired comparative accuracy design, and two studies used a randomized design. Five studies compared Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF for rifampicin resistance detection; four studies used a paired design, and one study used a randomized design. Of the nine included studies, seven (78%) were mainly or exclusively in high tuberculosis burden countries. For pulmonary tuberculosis detection, most studies had low risk of bias in all domains. Pulmonary tuberculosis detection Xpert Ultra pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% credible interval) against culture were 90.9% (86.2 to 94.7) and 95.6% (93.0 to 97.4) (7 studies, 2834 participants; high-certainty evidence) versus Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity of 84.7% (78.6 to 89.9) and 98.4% (97.0 to 99.3) (7 studies, 2835 participants; high-certainty evidence). The difference in the accuracy of Xpert Ultra minus Xpert MTB/RIF was estimated at 6.3% (0.1 to 12.8) for sensitivity and -2.7% (-5.7 to -0.5) for specificity. If the point estimates for Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF are applied to a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients, where 10% of those presenting with symptoms have pulmonary tuberculosis, Xpert Ultra will miss 9 cases, and Xpert MTB/RIF will miss 15 cases. The number of people wrongly diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis would be 40 with Xpert Ultra and 14 with Xpert MTB/RIF. In smear-negative, culture-positive participants, pooled sensitivity was 77.5% (67.6 to 85.6) for Xpert Ultra versus 60.6% (48.4 to 71.7) for Xpert MTB/RIF; pooled specificity was 95.8% (92.9 to 97.7) for Xpert Ultra versus 98.8% (97.7 to 99.5) for Xpert MTB/RIF (6 studies). In people living with HIV, pooled sensitivity was 87.6% (75.4 to 94.1) for Xpert Ultra versus 74.9% (58.7 to 86.2) for Xpert MTB/RIF; pooled specificity was 92.8% (82.3 to 97.0) for Xpert Ultra versus 99.7% (98.6 to 100.0) for Xpert MTB/RIF (3 studies). In participants with a history of tuberculosis, pooled sensitivity was 84.2% (72.5 to 91.7) for Xpert Ultra versus 81.8% (68.7 to 90.0) for Xpert MTB/RIF; pooled specificity was 88.2% (70.5 to 96.6) for Xpert Ultra versus 97.4% (91.7 to 99.5) for Xpert MTB/RIF (4 studies). The proportion of Ultra trace-positive results ranged from 3.0% to 30.4%. Data were insufficient to estimate the accuracy of Xpert Ultra repeat testing in individuals with initial trace-positive results. Rifampicin resistance detection Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 94.9% (88.9 to 97.9) and 99.1% (97.7 to 99.8) (5 studies, 921 participants; high-certainty evidence) for Xpert Ultra versus 95.3% (90.0 to 98.1) and 98.8% (97.2 to 99.6) (5 studies, 930 participants; high-certainty evidence) for Xpert MTB/RIF. The difference in the accuracy of Xpert Ultra minus Xpert MTB/RIF was estimated at -0.3% (-6.9 to 5.7) for sensitivity and 0.3% (-1.2 to 2.0) for specificity. If the point estimates for Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF are applied to a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients, where 10% of those presenting with symptoms have rifampicin resistance, Xpert Ultra will miss 5 cases, and Xpert MTB/RIF will miss 5 cases. The number of people wrongly diagnosed with rifampicin resistance would be 8 with Xpert Ultra and 11 with Xpert MTB/RIF. We identified a higher number of rifampicin resistance indeterminate results with Xpert Ultra, pooled proportion 7.6% (2.4 to 21.0) compared to Xpert MTB/RIF pooled proportion 0.8% (0.2 to 2.4). The estimated difference in the pooled proportion of indeterminate rifampicin resistance results for Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF was 6.7% (1.4 to 20.1).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-negative participants and people living with HIV. Xpert Ultra specificity was lower than that of Xpert MTB/RIF in participants with a history of tuberculosis. The sensitivity and specificity trade-off would be expected to vary by setting. For detection of rifampicin resistance, Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF had similar sensitivity and specificity. Ultra trace-positive results were common. Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF provide accurate results and can allow rapid initiation of treatment for rifampicin-resistant and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Diagnosis of Tuberculosis Using Gastric Aspirates in Pediatric Patients in Haiti

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine whether the Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay is a useful adjunct to culture for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) using gastric lavage aspirates (GLAs) in children aged < 5 years.

METHODS

We reviewed the yield from diagnostic modalities in children suspected of having TB followed at an infectious disease research and treatment center in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, from 2011 to 2016.

RESULTS

In 187 children clinically diagnosed with TB, a microbiologic diagnosis could be established in 40 (21%). Cultures, Xpert, and smears were positive in 30 (19%), 28 (17%), and 3 (1.6%) children, respectively. Ten cases that would not have been diagnosed by culture alone were found by the use of the Xpert assay. Collecting 2 GLA samples optimized microbiologic yield.

CONCLUSIONS

In GLAs, Xpert increased the yield of microbiologically documented cases by 33%. Additionally, the rapidity of diagnosis potentially makes Xpert a valuable adjunct in initiating treatment for TB in children. Smear microscopy has low sensitivity in GLA and did not add to the documented cases. Our findings also highlight the low rate of microbiologic confirmation of clinically diagnosed TB.

Long-read sequencing based clinical metagenomics for the detection and confirmation of Pneumocystis jirovecii directly from clinical specimens: A paradigm shift in mycological diagnostics

The advent of next generation sequencing technologies has enabled the characterization of the genetic content of entire communities of organisms, including those in clinical specimens, without prior culturing. The MinION from Oxford Nanopore Technologies offers real-time, direct sequencing of long DNA fragments directly from clinical samples. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of unbiased, genome-wide, long-read, shotgun sequencing using MinION to identify Pneumocystis jirovecii directly from respiratory tract specimens and to characterize the associated mycobiome. Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a life-threatening fungal disease caused by P. jirovecii. Currently, the diagnosis of PCP relies on direct microscopic or real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) examination of respiratory tract specimens, as P. jirovecii cannot be cultured readily in vitro. P. jirovecii DNA was detected in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and induced sputum (IS) samples from three patients with confirmed PCP. Other fungi present in the associated mycobiome included known human pathogens (Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Pichia) as well as commensal species (Candida, Malassezia, Bipolaris). We have established optimized sample preparation conditions for the generation of high-quality data, curated databases, and data analysis tools, which are key to the application of long-read MinION sequencing leading to a fundamental new approach in fungal diagnostics.

Targeted next generation sequencing directly from sputum for comprehensive genetic information on drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Timely drug resistance detection is essential to global tuberculosis management. Unfortunately, rapid molecular tests assess resistance to only a few drugs, with culture required for comprehensive susceptibility test results.

METHODS

We evaluated targeted next generation sequencing (tNGS) for tuberculosis on 40 uncultured sputum samples. Resistance profiles from tNGS were compared with profiles from Xpert MTB/RIF, line probe assay (LPA), pyrosequencing (PSQ), and phenotypic testing. Concordance, sensitivity, specificity, and overall test agreement were compared across assays.

RESULTS

tNGS provided results for 39 of 40 samples (97.5%) with faster turnaround than phenotypic testing (median 3 vs. 21 days, p = 0.0068). Most samples were isoniazid and rifampin resistant (N = 31, 79.5%), 21 (53.8%) were fluoroquinolone resistant, and 3 (7.7%) were also resistant to Kanamycin. Half were of the Beijing lineage (N = 20, 51.3%). tNGS from uncultured sputum identified all resistance to isoniazid, rifampin, fluoroquinolones, and second-line injectable drugs that was identified by other methods. Agreement between tNGS and existing assays was excellent for isoniazid, rifampin, and SLDs, very good for levofloxacin, and good for moxifloxacin.

CONCLUSION

tNGS can rapidly identify tuberculosis, lineage, and drug resistance with faster turnaround than phenotypic testing. tNGS is a potential alternative to phenotypic testing in high-burden settings.

Childhood Intra-Thoracic Tuberculosis Clinical Presentation Determines Yield of Laboratory Diagnostic Assays

Diagnosis of intra-thoracic tuberculosis (ITTB) in children is difficult due to the paucibacillary nature of the disease, the challenge in collecting appropriate specimens, and the low sensitivity of smear microscopy and culture. Culture and Xpert MTB/RIF provide higher diagnostic yield in presumptive TB in adults than in children. Current study was designed to understand poor yield of diagnostic assays in children. Children with presumptive ITTB were subjected to gastric aspirates and induced sputum twice. Samples were tested by Ziehl-Neelsen stain, Xpert MTB/RIF-assay, and MGIT-960 culture. Subjects were grouped as Confirmed, Unconfirmed, and Unlikely TB, and classified as progressive primary disease (PPD, lung parenchymal lesion), and primary pulmonary complex (PPC, hilar lymphadenopathy) on chest X-ray. Of children with culture-positive TB 51/394 (12.9%), culture-negative TB 305 (77.4%), and unlikely TB 38 (9.6%), 9 (2.3%) were smear positive, while 95 (24.1%) were Xpert-MTB/RIF positive. Xpert-MTB/RIF detected 40/51 culture confirmed cases (sensitivity 78.4% and NPV 96.3%). Culture was positive in more children presenting as PPD (p < 0.04). In culture-negative TB group, Xpert positivity was seen in 31% of those with PPD and 11.9% in those with PPC (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Xpert-MTB/RIF improved diagnosis by 2-fold and increased detection of MDR-TB. Both liquid culture and Xpert-MTB/RIF gave higher yield in children with lung parenchymal lesions. Children with hilar lymphadenopathy without active lung parenchymal lesions had poor diagnostic yield even with sensitive nucleic acid amplification tests, due to paucibacillary/localized disease, suggesting possible utility of invasively collected samples in early diagnosis and treatment.

Which sample type is better for Xpert MTB/RIF to diagnose adult and pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis?

Objective: This review aimed to identify proper respiratory-related sample types for adult and pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), respectively, by comparing performance of Xpert MTB/RIF when using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), induced sputum (IS), expectorated sputum (ES), nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs), and gastric aspiration (GA) as sample.

Methods: Articles were searched in Web of Science, PubMed, and Ovid from inception up to 29 June 2020. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated, each with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality assessment and heterogeneity evaluation across included studies were performed.

Results: A total of 50 articles were included. The respective sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95% CI: 0.84–0.89), 91% (95% CI: 0.90–0.92) and 95% (95% CI: 0.93–0.97) in the adult BAL group; 90% (95% CI: 0.88–0.91), 98% (95% CI: 0.97–0.98) and 97% (95% CI: 0.95–0.99) in the adult ES group; 86% (95% CI: 0.84–0.89) and 97% (95% CI: 0.96–0.98) in the adult IS group. Xpert MTB/RIF showed the sensitivity and specificity of 14% (95% CI: 0.10–0.19) and 99% (95% CI: 0.97–1.00) in the pediatric ES group; 80% (95% CI: 0.72–0.87) and 94% (95% CI: 0.92–0.95) in the pediatric GA group; 67% (95% CI: 0.62–0.72) and 99% (95% CI: 0.98–0.99) in the pediatric IS group; and 54% (95% CI: 0.43–0.64) and 99% (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) in the pediatric NPA group. The heterogeneity across included studies was deemed acceptable.

Conclusion: Considering diagnostic accuracy, cost and sampling process, ES was a better choice than other sample types for diagnosing adult PTB, especially HIV-associated PTB. GA might be more suitable than other sample types for diagnosing pediatric PTB. The actual choice of sample types should also consider the needs of specific situations.

Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assays for active tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in children

BACKGROUND

Every year, at least one million children become ill with tuberculosis and around 200,000 children die. Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra are World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended rapid molecular tests that simultaneously detect tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults and children with signs and symptoms of tuberculosis, at lower health system levels. To inform updated WHO guidelines on molecular assays, we performed a systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy of these tests in children presumed to have active tuberculosis.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objectives • To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra for (a) pulmonary tuberculosis in children presumed to have tuberculosis; (b) tuberculous meningitis in children presumed to have tuberculosis; (c) lymph node tuberculosis in children presumed to have tuberculosis; and (d) rifampicin resistance in children presumed to have tuberculosis - For tuberculosis detection, index tests were used as the initial test, replacing standard practice (i.e. smear microscopy or culture) - For detection of rifampicin resistance, index tests replaced culture-based drug susceptibility testing as the initial test Secondary objectives • To compare the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra for each of the four target conditions • To investigate potential sources of heterogeneity in accuracy estimates - For tuberculosis detection, we considered age, disease severity, smear-test status, HIV status, clinical setting, specimen type, high tuberculosis burden, and high tuberculosis/HIV burden - For detection of rifampicin resistance, we considered multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis burden • To compare multiple Xpert MTB/RIF or Xpert Ultra results (repeated testing) with the initial Xpert MTB/RIF or Xpert Ultra result SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) Registry up to 29 April 2019, without language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials, cross-sectional trials, and cohort studies evaluating Xpert MTB/RIF or Xpert Ultra in HIV-positive and HIV-negative children younger than 15 years. Reference standards comprised culture or a composite reference standard for tuberculosis and drug susceptibility testing or MTBDRplus (molecular assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance) for rifampicin resistance. We included studies evaluating sputum, gastric aspirate, stool, nasopharyngeal or bronchial lavage specimens (pulmonary tuberculosis), cerebrospinal fluid (tuberculous meningitis), fine needle aspirates, or surgical biopsy tissue (lymph node tuberculosis).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy - Revised (QUADAS-2). For each target condition, we used the bivariate model to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We stratified all analyses by type of reference standard. We assessed certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

For pulmonary tuberculosis, 299 data sets (68,544 participants) were available for analysis; for tuberculous meningitis, 10 data sets (423 participants) were available; for lymph node tuberculosis, 10 data sets (318 participants) were available; and for rifampicin resistance, 14 data sets (326 participants) were available. Thirty-nine studies (80%) took place in countries with high tuberculosis burden. Risk of bias was low except for the reference standard domain, for which risk of bias was unclear because many studies collected only one specimen for culture. Detection of pulmonary tuberculosis For sputum specimens, Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) verified by culture were 64.6% (55.3% to 72.9%) (23 studies, 493 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and 99.0% (98.1% to 99.5%) (23 studies, 6119 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). For other specimen types (nasopharyngeal aspirate, 4 studies; gastric aspirate, 14 studies; stool, 11 studies), Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity ranged between 45.7% and 73.0%, and pooled specificity ranged between 98.1% and 99.6%. For sputum specimens, Xpert Ultra pooled sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) verified by culture were 72.8% (64.7% to 79.6%) (3 studies, 136 participants; low-certainty evidence) and 97.5% (95.8% to 98.5%) (3 studies, 551 participants; high-certainty evidence). For nasopharyngeal specimens, Xpert Ultra sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) were 45.7% (28.9% to 63.3%) and 97.5% (93.7% to 99.3%) (1 study, 195 participants). For all specimen types, Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra sensitivity were lower against a composite reference standard than against culture. Detection of tuberculous meningitis For cerebrospinal fluid, Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity, verified by culture, were 54.0% (95% CI 27.8% to 78.2%) (6 studies, 28 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and 93.8% (95% CI 84.5% to 97.6%) (6 studies, 213 participants; low-certainty evidence). Detection of lymph node tuberculosis For lymph node aspirates or biopsies, Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity, verified by culture, were 90.4% (95% CI 55.7% to 98.6%) (6 studies, 68 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and 89.8% (95% CI 71.5% to 96.8%) (6 studies, 142 participants; low-certainty evidence). Detection of rifampicin resistance Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity were 90.0% (67.6% to 97.5%) (6 studies, 20 participants; low-certainty evidence) and 98.3% (87.7% to 99.8%) (6 studies, 203 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found Xpert MTB/RIF sensitivity to vary by specimen type, with gastric aspirate specimens having the highest sensitivity followed by sputum and stool, and nasopharyngeal specimens the lowest; specificity in all specimens was > 98%. Compared with Xpert MTB/RIF, Xpert Ultra sensitivity in sputum was higher and specificity slightly lower. Xpert MTB/RIF was accurate for detection of rifampicin resistance. Xpert MTB/RIF was sensitive for diagnosing lymph node tuberculosis. For children with presumed tuberculous meningitis, treatment decisions should be based on the entirety of clinical information and treatment should not be withheld based solely on an Xpert MTB/RIF result. The small numbers of studies and participants, particularly for Xpert Ultra, limits our confidence in the precision of these estimates.

Combination of Percutaneous Lung Biopsy and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Enhances the Differential Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: A Prospective Cohort Study

Introduction

To evaluate the value of the combination of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous lung biopsy and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) in enhancing the differential diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Methods

Patients with lesions in the lungs for whom the differential diagnosis was difficult were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Specimens collected by percutaneous lung biopsy were subject to Xpert-Ultra and histopathologic examination, respectively.

Results

Biopsy was successfully performed for 147 patients who were eligible for analysis, including 65 TB, 55 lung cancer and 27 other chronic infection cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Xpert-Ultra for TB diagnosis were 75.38% (49/65) and 95.12% (78/82), 92.45% (49/53) and 82.98% (78/94), respectively. Among patients with strong evidence for TB diagnosis (categorized as confirmed or probable TB cases), the overall positive rate of the Xpert-Ultra assay was 83.63% (46/55), which was much higher than for any reported sample type with negative smear test outcomes to date. Five rifampicin (RIF)-resistant cases were identified using the biopsy tissues. However, “trace” positive did not seem reliable for TB diagnosis with lung biopsy specimens; a 25.61% (21/82) “trace”-positive rate was acquired in the non-TB group.

Conclusion

Percutaneous lung biopsy combined with Xpert-Ultra produced high sensitivity for culture-negative pulmonary TB patient diagnosis. “Trace” outcome might not be a reliable positive category for lung biopsy specimens.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, ChiCTR1900026412. Retrospectively registered on Oct 8th, 2019).

Diagnostic performance of culture filtered protein 10-specific perforin in pediatric patients with active tuberculosis

Background

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb)‐specific perforin were significantly increased in patients with tuberculosis. This study aims to evaluate the diagnosis value of Mtb‐specific perforin in pediatric patients with tuberculosis.

Methods

Diagnostic performance of perforin levels induced by 6‐kDa early secreted antigen target (ESAT6) or culture filtered protein 10 (CFP10) were evaluated in eighty‐six samples from children participants by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Flow cytometry was used to detect the expression of perforin and INF‐γ of CD4⁺, CD8⁺ T cells in response to CFP10 stimulation.

Results

After ex vivo stimulation, levels of ESAT6/CFP10‐specific perforin in LTBI patients were significantly higher than active TB (ATB) patients, non‐tuberculosis infection (non‐TB), and health control (HC) individuals. The diagnostic efficacy of CFP10‐specific perforin for TB diagnosis was significantly higher than ESAT6‐specific perforin and T‐SPOT assay, and when 0.74 ng/mL was taken as the cutoff value, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 97.83%, 87.5%, and 93.02%. CFP10‐specific perforin in both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were significantly higher in ATB patients compared to HCs and further increased in LTBI patients. However, INF‐γ was mainly secreted by CD4⁺ T cells and showed no significant difference between LTBI and ATB patients. In addition, CFP10‐specific perforin can effectively distinguish between ATB and LTBI with the cutoff value of 1.80 ng/mL. Sensitivity and specificity were 88.46% and 85.62%, respectively.

Conclusions

CFP10‐specific perforin may be used as a novel cellular immunity‐based diagnostic marker of pediatric patients with tuberculosis, and with the potential for discriminating ATB from LTBI.

Trends in Drug Resistance in Childhood Tuberculosis in Cape Town, South Africa

BACKGROUND

We determined mycobacterial drug resistance and HIV prevalence among children with bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis (TB) from March 2013 to February 2017. Results were compared with 5 previous 2-year surveillance studies (2003-2013).

METHODS

Prospective surveillance of all bacteriologically confirmed TB in children (0-13 years) completed at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Drug susceptibility testing was done by GenoType MTBDRplus for isoniazid and rifampicin; ofloxacin and amikacin drug susceptibility testing was completed if rifampicin resistance was detected. Xpert MTB/RIF was routinely introduced during this period.

RESULTS

Six hundred sixty-two children, median age 34 months (interquartile range 14-79) had bacteriologically confirmed TB; 587 (88.7%) were culture-confirmed and 75 (11.3%) confirmed by Xpert MTB/RIF only. Of culture-confirmed cases, 509 (86.7%) were pan-susceptible, 47 (8.0%) were multidrug-resistant, 13 (2.2%) were RIF-resistant/INH-susceptible and 18 (3.1%) were INH-resistant/RIF-susceptible. Of Xpert-positive cases, 3/75 (4%), 68/75 (92%) and 4/75 (5%) were RIF-resistant, RIF-susceptible and RIF-indeterminate, respectively. Of 573 (97.6%) children tested, 74 (12.9%) were HIV positive. Compared with previous surveillance periods, RIF mono-resistance increased from 0% to 2.2% (trend test: χ = 7.050, P = 0.0079). HIV prevalence decreased from 29% to 10.6% (trend test: χ = 27.975, P < 0.0001). Of multidrug-resistant cases, 15/47 (32%) were ofloxacin resistant.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in RIF-resistant/INH-susceptible cases and ofloxacin resistance among multidrug-resistant TB cases in children, indicative of recent transmission, is concerning. The prevalence of multidrug-resistant TB remains high in children.

Performance and Utilization of a Laboratory-Developed Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis in a Low-Prevalence Area

OBJECTIVES

Tuberculosis (TB) is a significant global health problem. In low-prevalence areas and low clinical suspicion, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) can speed therapy initiation and infection control. An NAAT assay (TBPCR) targeting MTBC IS6110 is used for detecting MTBC in our low-prevalence population.

METHODS

Fifteen-year review of patient records identified 146 patients with culture-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) or extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). Laboratory-developed TBPCR was retrospectively compared with standard stain and cultures for PTB and EPTB diagnoses.

RESULTS

TBPCR assay was used in 57% of patients with PTB and 33% of patients with EPTB. TBPCR detected 88.4% of all TB (smear-positive, 97%; smear-negative, 79%) with 100% specificity. Low bacterial load was indicated in TBPCR-negative PTB (P = .002) and EPTB (P < .008).

CONCLUSIONS

TBPCR performance was optimum but significantly underused. Guidelines are proposed for mandated use of TBPCR that capture patients with clinically suspected PTB. Focused TBPCR use in low prevalence populations will benefit patient care, infection prevention, and public health.

Prevalence of culture positive Tuberculosis and utility of a clinical diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of Tuberculosis among HIV Infected Children attending HIV/AIDS Care and Treatment in Dodoma Municipality, Central Tanzania

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the modified Keith Edwards TB clinical diagnostic tool among HIV infected children.

METHODS

Cross sectional study of 252 HIV infected children < 15 years old suspected with TB at four HIV/AIDS Care Clinics in Dodoma, Tanzania from November 2018 - March 2019. The modified Keith Edwards TB clinical diagnostic tool was compared to gastric aspirates, lymphnode aspirates or sputum gene x-pert MTB/RIF and TB culture. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of the clinical tool were determined. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 25.

RESULTS

Out of 252 children evaluated, 13.5% (34/252) had TB using the clinical diagnostic tool and 5.2% (13/252) had culture positive TB. The sensitivity of the clinical tool was 76.9%, specificity of 90%. Culture positive TB predictors were lymphadenopathy (AOR 13.74, 95%CI (3.86 - 48.86) p value < 0.001), weight loss (AOR 3.19,95%CI (1.38 - 7.36) p value 0.007), and difficulty breathing (AOR 7.25, 95%CI (1.54 - 34.16) p value 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The utility of the modified Keith Edwards clinical diagnostic tool for Tuberculosis diagnosis among HIV infected children is limited, calling for further validation. HIV infected children with lymphadenopathy, failure to thrive and difficulty in breathing are at high risk of Tuberculosis.

Improving pediatric TB diagnosis in North Kivu (DR Congo), focusing on a clinical algorithm including targeted Xpert MTB/RIF on gastric aspirates

Background

The incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is 323/100,000. A context of civil conflict, internally displaced people and mining activities suggests a higher regional TB incidence in North Kivu. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) supports the General Reference Hospital of Masisi, North Kivu, covering a population of 520,000, with an elevated rate of pediatric malnutrition. In July 2017, an adapted MSF pediatric TB diagnostic algorithm, including Xpert MTB/RIF on gastric aspirates (GAs), was implemented. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the introduction of this clinical pediatric TB diagnostic algorithm influenced the number of children started on TB treatment.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of pediatric TB cases started on treatment in the inpatient therapeutic feeding centre (ITFC) and the pediatric ward. We compared data collected in the second half (July to December) of 2016 (before introduction of the new diagnostic algorithm) and the second half of 2017. For the outcome variables the difference between the two years was calculated by a Pearson Chi-square test.

Results

In 2017, 94 GAs were performed, compared to none in 2016. Twelve percent (11/94) of samples were Xpert MTB/RIF positive. Sixty-eight children (2.9% of total exits) aged between 3 months and 15 years started TB treatment in 2017, compared to 19 (1.4% of total exits) in 2016 (p 0.002). The largest increase in pediatric TB diagnoses in 2017 occurred in patients with a negative Xpert MTB/RIF result, but clinically highly suggestive of TB according to the newly introduced diagnostic algorithm. Fifty-two (3.1%) children under five years old started treatment in 2017, as compared to 14 (1.3%) in 2016 (p 0.004). The increase was less pronounced and not statistically significant in older patients: sixteen children (2.6%) above 5 years old started TB treatment in 2017 as compared to five (1.3%) in 2016 (p 0.17).

Conclusion

After the introduction of an adapted clinical pediatric TB diagnostic algorithm, including Xpert MTB/RIF on gastric aspirates, we observed a significant increase in the number of children – especially under 5 years old – started on TB treatment, mostly on clinical grounds. Increased ‘clinician awareness’ of pediatric TB likely played an important role.

Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis from gastric aspirate samples in nonexpectorating pediatric patients in a tertiary care hospital

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of Xpert assay, Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining, and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT™) culture for diagnosis of pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis from gastric aspirate (GA) samples and to compare Xpert assay and ZN staining with MGIT rapid liquid culture.

Materials and Methods

GA samples from 210 nonexpectorating children, aged between 6 months to 12 years, presenting to the pediatric out-patient department (OPD) with clinical suspicion of tuberculosis (TB) were collected. The samples were tested by GeneXpert, ZN staining, and MGIT liquid culture.

Results

GeneXpert is a more sensitive method for rapid and early diagnosis of pediatric TB when compared with microscopy.

Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Children Using Xpert Ultra on Different Respiratory Specimens

Rationale: Microbiological confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis in children is desirable.Objectives: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy and incremental yield of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra; Cepheid), a new rapid test, on repeated induced sputum, nasopharyngeal aspirates, and combinations of specimens.Methods: Consecutive South African children hospitalized with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled.Measurements and Main Results: Induced sputum (IS) and nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs) were obtained. NPAs were frozen; IS underwent liquid culture, and an aliquot was frozen. Ultra was performed on thawed NPAs and IS specimens individually. Children were categorized as confirmed, unconfirmed, or unlikely tuberculosis according to NIH consensus case definitions. The diagnostic accuracy of Ultra was compared with liquid culture on IS. In total, 195 children (median age: 23.3 mo; 32 [16.4%] HIV-infected) had one IS and NPA, and 130 had two NPAs. There were 40 (20.5%) culture-confirmed cases. Ultra was positive on NPAs in 26 (13.3%) and on IS in 31 (15.9%). Sensitivity and specificity of Ultra on one NPA were 46% and 98%, respectively, and similar by HIV status. Sensitivity and specificity of Ultra on one IS were 74.3% and 96.9% respectively. Combining one NPA and one IS increased sensitivity to 80%. Sensitivity using Ultra on two NPAs was 54.2%, increasing to 87.5% with an IS Ultra.Conclusions: IS provides a better specimen than repeated NPA for rapid diagnosis using Ultra. However, Ultra testing of combinations of specimens provides a novel strategy that can be adapted to identify most children with confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis.

Emerging trends in microbiological diagnostics in children

The targets of the WHO's End TB Strategy and the United Nations' (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have been expanded to"Find. Treat. All #EndTB" with universal access to TB diagnosis, treatment and care by 2022 in an effort to end the global TB epidemic. Trends to achieve the above targets in children have led to greater emphasis on the newer diagnostics paving way to microbiological confirmation and universal drug sensitivity in children.

Priorities for Decreasing Morbidity and Mortality in Children With Advanced HIV Disease

Early mortality and morbidity remain high in children initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART), especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Many children still present with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. Tuberculosis, pneumonia, and severe bacterial infections are the main causes of hospital admission in HIV-infected children. In contrast to adults with advanced HIV disease, cryptococcal disease is not common in childhood, although there is a peak in infancy and adolescence. Interventions such as TB screening in symptomatic children, and isoniazid and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis should be implemented. There is evidence suggesting that rapid initiation (within 1 week) of ART in children with severe malnutrition or those with advanced HIV disease admitted to hospital is not beneficial and should be delayed until their condition has been stabilized. Research informing the prevention of severe bacterial infections, the management of pediatric immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, and other potential strategies to decrease morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected children are urgently needed.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in Sputum Smear-Negative Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Introduction

Tuberculosis is a major health problem in Pakistan. The prevalence of pulmonary as well as extrapulmonary tuberculosis is quite high. Tuberculin skin test, radiological imaging, and sputum smear microscopy have limitations in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Xpert MTB/RIF was recently approved for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and has shown promising results. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis using acid-fast bacilli (AFB) culture as the gold standard.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at Iqbal Yad Chest Clinic and Nazimabad Chest Clinic of Ojha Institute of Chest Diseases, Dow University of Health Sciences. Patients of either gender aged 18-65 years suspected to have pulmonary tuberculosis with at least two sputum samples negative for AFB underwent Xpert MTB/RIF testing. Early morning sputum samples were obtained and sent for AFB smear microscopy, Xpert testing and also for culture analysis.

Results

Mean age of the patients was 37.48 ±17.49 years. There were 84 (37.3%) females and 141 (62.7%) males. Positive findings on Xpert MTB/RIF were found in 147 (65.3%) patients whereas AFB culture showed positive findings in 174 (77.3%) patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value, negative predicted value and overall diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF was found to be 84.48%, 100%, 100%, 65.38%, and 88%, respectively.

Conclusion

Xpert MTB/RIF has high sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative cases of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of rifampicin resistance in different regions: a meta-analysis

Background

To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for rifampicin resistance in different regions, a meta-analysis was carried out.

Methods

Several databases were searched for relevant studies up to March 3, 2019. A bivariate random-effects model was used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy.

Results

We identified 97 studies involving 26,037 samples for the diagnosis of rifampicin resistance. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC of Xpert MTB/RIF for rifampicin resistance detection were 0.93 (95% CI 0.90–0.95), 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–0.99), respectively. For different regions, the pooled sensitivity were 0.94(95% CI 0.89–0.97) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.88–0.94), the pooled specificity were 0.98 (95% CI 0.94–1.00) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–0.99), and the AUC were 0.99 (95% CI 0.98–1.00) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–0.99) in high and middle/low income countries, respectively. The pooled sensitivity were 0.91 (95% CI 0.87–0.94) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.94), the pooled specificity were 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–0.99), and the AUC were 0.98 (95% CI 0.97–0.99) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–0.99) in high TB burden and middle/low prevalence countries, respectively.

Conclusions

The diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for rifampicin resistance detection was excellent.

Pediatric TB Management under RNTCP: What and Why?

Childhood tuberculosis does not get the attention it deserves, both in the general child health services and the TB specific services. The difficulty in identification of the organism due to lack of proper sample as well as lower sensitivity of the smear, made it harder to detect cases with ease in the community. Newer diagnostic methods like cartridge based nucleic acid amplification tests (CBNAAT) and line probe assays (LPA) have the capacity to rapidly identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis with an improved sensitivity over the smear testing and have been employed under Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) across the country. As the symptoms suggestive of TB are very common and overlapping, the final yield of TB testing is better if the microbiological confirmation is done on good quality specimen from cases suspected of TB based on clinical and radiological abnormalities. Newer tests also provide simultaneous detection of much critical Rifampicin resistance. A Rifampicin resistant case is not only unlikely to respond to first-line standard therapy but such a treatment can result in further amplification of resistance to other companion drugs. Prevention of spread of the drug resistant disease thus requires that the treatment is guided by universal drug sensitivity testing (U-DST) of all TB cases. Furthermore, several changes have come up in the treatment of TB and are discussed. The dosages of anti TB drugs have been revised upwardly for optimal drug levels and now the fixed drug combinations are used under RNTCP. With the awareness about high initial Isoniazid (INH) resistance and its contribution to failure of retreatment regime, a companion third drug (Ethambutol) has been added to the continuation phase of the first-line therapy. The standard retreatment regime, better known as category II therapy, has been replaced by specific therapy as per the resistance pattern detected. The TB control activities have thus evolved a lot and the present article discusses the evolution and the current status of diagnostics and therapy of TB in children.

Alternative sputum collection methods for diagnosis of childhood intrathoracic tuberculosis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of intrathoracic tuberculosis (ITB) is limited in children partly by their difficulty to produce sputum specimen.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the detection yields of mycobacterial culture and Xpert MTB/RIF from induced sputum (IS), nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) and gastric aspirate (GA) in children with presumptive ITB.

DESIGN

Pubmed, Embase and Biosis databases and grey literature were searched. Randomised controlled trials, cohort, cross-sectional or case control studies using IS, GA and NPA for diagnosis of ITB published between January 1990 and January 2018 were included. Data were extracted on study design, case definition of presumptive ITB, sample collection methods, outcome measures and results.

RESULTS

30 studies were selected, including 11 554 children. Detection yields for culture ranged between 1% and 30% for IS, 1% and 45% for GA and 4% and 24% for NPA. For Xpert MTB/RIF, it was between 2% and 17% for IS, 5% and 51% for GA and 3% and 8% for NPA. There was a tendency of better yields with IS when the pretest probability of ITB was low to moderate and with GA when it was high. Sampling a second specimen contributed for 6%-33% of the cumulative yield and combination of different methods significantly increase the detection yields.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the important study heterogeneity, any of the specimen collection methods offers good potential to confirm childhood ITB. However, their operational challenges were poorly evaluated. In the absence of a sensitive non-sputum based test, only a minority of children with ITB can be confirmed.

Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults

BACKGROUND

Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert MTB/RIF) and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra), the newest version, are the only World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended rapid tests that simultaneously detect tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in persons with signs and symptoms of tuberculosis, at lower health system levels. A previous Cochrane Review found Xpert MTB/RIF sensitive and specific for tuberculosis (Steingart 2014). Since the previous review, new studies have been published. We performed a review update for an upcoming WHO policy review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra for tuberculosis in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and for rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, Web of Science, Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Scopus, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry, and ProQuest, to 11 October 2018, without language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials, cross-sectional, and cohort studies using respiratory specimens that evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF, Xpert Ultra, or both against the reference standard, culture for tuberculosis and culture-based drug susceptibility testing or MTBDRplus for rifampicin resistance.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four review authors independently extracted data using a standardized form. When possible, we also extracted data by smear and HIV status. We assessed study quality using QUADAS-2 and performed meta-analyses to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity separately for tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. We investigated potential sources of heterogeneity. Most analyses used a bivariate random-effects model. For tuberculosis detection, we first estimated accuracy using all included studies and then only the subset of studies where participants were unselected, i.e. not selected based on prior microscopy testing.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified in total 95 studies (77 new studies since the previous review): 86 studies (42,091 participants) evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis and 57 studies (8287 participants) for rifampicin resistance. One study compared Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra on the same participant specimen.Tuberculosis detectionOf the total 86 studies, 45 took place in high tuberculosis burden and 50 in high TB/HIV burden countries. Most studies had low risk of bias.Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% credible Interval (CrI)) were 85% (82% to 88%) and 98% (97% to 98%), (70 studies, 37,237 unselected participants; high-certainty evidence). We found similar accuracy when we included all studies.For a population of 1000 people where 100 have tuberculosis on culture, 103 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-positive and 18 (17%) would not have tuberculosis (false-positives); 897 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-negative and 15 (2%) would have tuberculosis (false-negatives).Xpert Ultra sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) was 88% (85% to 91%) versus Xpert MTB/RIF 83% (79% to 86%); Xpert Ultra specificity was 96% (94% to 97%) versus Xpert MTB/RIF 98% (97% to 99%), (1 study, 1439 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity was 98% (97% to 98%) in smear-positive and 67% (62% to 72%) in smear-negative, culture-positive participants, (45 studies). Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity was 88% (83% to 92%) in HIV-negative and 81% (75% to 86%) in HIV-positive participants; specificities were similar 98% (97% to 99%), (14 studies).Rifampicin resistance detectionXpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% Crl) were 96% (94% to 97%) and 98% (98% to 99%), (48 studies, 8020 participants; high-certainty evidence).For a population of 1000 people where 100 have rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, 114 would be positive for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis and 18 (16%) would not have rifampicin resistance (false-positives); 886 would be would be negative for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis and four (0.4%) would have rifampicin resistance (false-negatives).Xpert Ultra sensitivity (95% CI) was 95% (90% to 98%) versus Xpert MTB/RIF 95% (91% to 98%); Xpert Ultra specificity was 98% (97% to 99%) versus Xpert MTB/RIF 98% (96% to 99%), (1 study, 551 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found Xpert MTB/RIF to be sensitive and specific for diagnosing PTB and rifampicin resistance, consistent with findings reported previously. Xpert MTB/RIF was more sensitive for tuberculosis in smear-positive than smear-negative participants and HIV-negative than HIV-positive participants. Compared with Xpert MTB/RIF, Xpert Ultra had higher sensitivity and lower specificity for tuberculosis and similar sensitivity and specificity for rifampicin resistance (1 study). Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra provide accurate results and can allow rapid initiation of treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Diagnostic strategies for childhood tuberculosis in the context of primary care in a high burden setting: the value of alternative sampling methods

Background: Hospital studies have demonstrated the usefulness of alternative sampling strategies to expectorated sputum and new diagnostics for the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis (TB) but there is limited evidence of how these approaches work in the primary-care setting. Aim: To assess the feasibility and yield of a variety of sample types and diagnostic tests for childhood TB at a primary-care clinic. Methods: A prospective cohort of children (<10 years) with signs and symptoms of TB was enrolled at a primary-care clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa. Tuberculin skin testing (TST) and chest X-ray (CXR) were performed in all. In those unable to expectorate, one induced sputum (IS), one ambulatory gastric aspirate (GA) and two nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) were collected. Stool was collected from all. Samples were processed for smear microscopy, liquid culture and Xpert MTB/RIF. The Determine TB LAM Ag (LAM) test was used for HIV-positive children. Results: From July 2013-December 2014, 119 children were enrolled, 21 (18%) of whom were HIV-positive. TST was positive in 25/105 (24%) and 70/116 (70%) had a positive CXR. Four (3%) had confirmed TB, 101 (85%) unconfirmed TB and 15 (13%) unlikely TB. Of the 469 samples collected, smear microscopy was positive in none, Xpert was positive in four (<1%) and culture was positive in two (<1%). Three of 11 (27%) HIV-positive patients were positive by LAM. Treatment was commenced in 48/119 (40%). Conclusions: At primary-care, alternative sampling strategies proved feasible but resulted in a low diagnostic yield. Extensive efforts to bacteriologically diagnose children did not contribute to clinical management.

Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Children

INTRODUCTION

Childhood tuberculosis (TB) is now a global priority. With the advent of Xpert MTB/RIF, more TB cases in children are being reported. This study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of Xpert in diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary TB in children.

METHODS

Specimens from 171 suspected TB cases in children aged <15 years were tested with Xpert, culture and smear microscopy in the Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

RESULTS

The specimens included 106 gastric aspirates, 51 cerebrospinal fluids, 8 induced sputum and 6 lymph node aspirates. Xpert detected Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 19 cases (14 pulmonary and 5 extra-pulmonary), 7 of which were rifampicin-resistant. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Xpert compared with culture were 88.89, 98.04, 84.21 and 98.68%, respectively. The sensitivity was 100% in children aged 1-5 years and 6-10 years and in gastric aspirates.

CONCLUSION

Xpert is an efficient diagnostic tool in childhood tuberculosis.

Feasibility of the string test for tuberculosis diagnosis in children between 4 and 14 years old

BACKGROUND

The enteric string test can be used to obtain a specimen for microbiological confirmation of tuberculosis in children, but it is not widely used for this. The aim of this analysis to evaluate this approach in children with tuberculosis symptoms.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess children's ability to complete the test (feasibility), and self-reported pain (tolerability). We examined caregivers' and children's willingness to repeat the procedure (acceptability) and described the diagnostic yield of cultures for diagnostic tools. We stratified estimates by age and compared metrics to those derived for gastric aspirate (GA).

RESULTS

Among 148 children who attempted the string test, 34% successfully swallowed the capsule. Feasibility was higher among children aged 11-14 than in children 4-10 years (83% vs 22% respectively, p < 0.0001). The string test was better tolerated than GA in both age groups; however, guardians and older children reported higher rates of willingness to repeat GA than the string test (86% vs. 58% in children; 100% vs. 83% in guardians). In 9 children with a positive sputum culture, 6 had a positive string culture. The one children with a positive gastric aspirate culture also had a positive string culture.

CONCLUSION

Although the string test was generally tolerable and accepted by children and caregivers; feasibility in young children was low. Reducing the capsule size may improve test success rates in younger children.

Upfront Xpert MTB/RIF testing on various specimen types for presumptive infant TB cases for early and appropriate treatment initiation

Background

Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in infants is challenging due to non-specific clinical presentations of the disease in this age-group and low sensitivity of widely available TB diagnostic tools, which in turn delays prompt access to TB treatment. Upfront access to Xpert/MTB RIF (Xpert) testing, a highly sensitive and specific rapid diagnostic tool, could potentially address some of these challenges. Under the current project, we assessed the utility and feasibility of applying upfront Xpert for diagnosis of tuberculosis in infants, including for testing of non-sputum specimens.

Methods

A high throughput lab was established in each of the four project cities, and linked to various health care providers across the city, through rapid specimen transportation and electronic reporting linkages. Free Xpert testing was offered to all infant (<2 years of age) presumptive TB cases (both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary) seeking care at public and private health facilities.

Results

A total of 7,994 presumptive infant TB cases were enrolled in the project from April 2014 to October 2016, detecting 465 (5.8%, CI: 5.3–6.4) TB cases. The majority (93.9%; CI: 93.4–94.4) of patient specimens were non-sputum and TB positivity was higher amongst non-sputum specimens. Further, a high proportion (5.6% CI 3.8–8.1) of infant TB cases were found to be rifampicin resistant. Covering large cities with a single lab per city over more than two years, the project demonstrated the feasibility of same-day diagnosis with upfront Xpert testing. This in turn led to prompt treatment initiation, with a two-day median turnaround time to treatment initiation. Case mortality observed in the project cohort of diagnosed TB cases was 11.0% (CI 8.4–14.1), the majority of which was pre- or early treatment mortality, in spite of prompt access to treatment for most diagnosed cases.

Conclusion

The current project demonstrated the feasibility of applying rapid and upfront Xpert testing for presumptive infant TB cases. Rapid TB diagnosis in turn facilitates prompt and appropriate treatment initiation. Further, levels of rifampicin resistance observed in infants TB cases highlight the additional benefit of upfront resistance testing. However, high rates of early case mortality, in spite of prompt diagnosis and treatment initiation, highlight the need for further research in infant patient pathways for overall improvement in TB care for infant populations.

Successful Diagnosis of Intestinal Mycobacterium avium Complex Infection in a Kidney Transplant Recipient Using Nasogastric Aspirate Culture: A Case Report

Intestinal Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections are rare and can be challenging to diagnose. We describe a case of intestinal MAC infection in a kidney transplant recipient with 5 months of unexplained weight loss and abdominal pain who developed intestinal obstruction. Esophagoduodenoscopy with biopsies was performed but was nondiagnostic. Intestinal MAC was diagnosed via nasogastric aspirate culture results. The patient's symptoms rapidly improved after initiation of appropriate treatment, but he later died of aspiration pneumonia and candidemia.

Xpert MTB/RIF assay did not improve diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis among child contacts in Rwanda

Introduction

To report on the diagnostic yield using the Xpert MTB/RIF assay on gastric lavage samples from children (<15 years) who were household contacts of tuberculosis (TB) cases in Kigali, Rwanda.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 216 child contacts of index cases with sputum smear-positive TB over a 7 month period, from 1^st August 2015 to 29^th February 2016. Child contacts with tuberculosis-related symptoms or abnormal chest X-ray had sputum collected by gastric lavage on two consecutive days and samples were examined by smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF assay and solid culture.

Results

Of the 216 child contacts, 94 (44%) were less than 5 years of age. Most of them 84 (89%) were receiving isoniazid preventive therapy at the time of screening. Thirty seven out of 216 children had TB-related symptoms. Only 4 (10.8%) were clinically diagnosed with TB; and none had bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis.

Conclusion

The use of Xpert MTB/RIF assay did not contribute to bacteriological confirmation of active TB in child contacts in this study. The low prevalence of tuberculosis in child contacts in this study may reflect the high coverage of preventive therapy in young (<5 years) child contacts. The low sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in contacts may also suggest likely reflection of paucibacillary disease.

Xpert MTB/RIF diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis from sputum and stool samples in a high TB-HIV-prevalent setting

The Xpert MTB/RIF assay is a major advance for diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in high-burden countries but is limited in children by their difficulty to produce sputum. We investigated TB in sputum and stool from children with the aim of improving paediatric TB diagnosis. A prospective cohort of children with presumptive TB, provided two sputum or induced sputum at enrolment in a regional referral hospital in Uganda. Stool was collected from those started on TB treatment. All specimen were tested for Xpert MTB/RIF, mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT), Lowenstein Jensen cultures and microscopy (except stool). We compared TB detection between age categories and assessed the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF in sputum and stool. Of the 392 children enrolled, 357 (91.1%) produced at least one sputum sample. Sputum culture yield was 13/357 (3.6%): 3/109 (2.6%), 3/89 (3.2%), 3/101 (2.6%) and 4/44 (8.2%) among children of < 2, 2-5, ≥ 5-10 and > 10 years, respectively (p = 0.599). Xpert MTB/RIF yield was 14/350 (4.0%): 3/104 (2.9%), 4/92 (4.3%), 3/88 (2.9%) and 4/50 (.0%), respectively (p = 0.283). Sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF in sputum against sputum culture were 90.9% (95% CI 58.7-99.8) and 99.1% (99.1-99.8). In stool, it was 55.6% (21.2-86.3) and 98.2% (98.2-100) against Xpert MTB/RIF and culture in sputum. Only a minority of children had microbiologically confirmed TB with a higher proportion in children above 10 years. Although sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF in stool was low, with good optimization, it might be a good alternative to sputum in children.