Safety and efficacy of CVT-301 (levodopa inhalation powder) on motor function during off periods in patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

The Potential of Metabolomics to Find Proper Biomarkers for Addressing the Neuroprotective Efficacy of Drugs Aimed at Delaying Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Disease Progression

The first objective is to highlight the lack of tools to measure whether a given intervention affords neuroprotection in patients with Alzheimer's or Parkinson's diseases. A second aim is to present the primary outcome measures used in clinical trials in cohorts of patients with neurodegenerative diseases. The final aim is to discuss whether metabolomics using body fluids may lead to the discovery of biomarkers of neuroprotection. Information on the primary outcome measures in clinical trials related to Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease registered since 2018 was collected. We analysed the type of measures selected to assess efficacy, not in terms of neuroprotection since, as stated in the aims, there is not yet any marker of neuroprotection. Proteomic approaches using plasma or CSF have been proposed. PET could estimate the extent of lesions, but disease progression does not necessarily correlate with a change in tracer uptake. We propose some alternatives based on considering the metabolome. A new opportunity opens with metabolomics because there have been impressive technological advances that allow the detection, among others, of metabolites related to mitochondrial function and mitochondrial structure in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid; some of the differentially concentrated metabolites can become reliable biomarkers of neuroprotection.

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of apomorphine sublingual film in patients with Parkinson's disease complicated by OFF episodes: a phase 3, open-label study

BACKGROUND

Apomorphine sublingual film (SL-APO) is an on-demand treatment for OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term (≥ 3 years) safety/tolerability and efficacy of SL-APO.

METHODS

Study CTH-301 ( http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov NCT02542696; registered 2015-09-03) was a phase 3, multicentre, open-label study of SL-APO in PD patients with motor fluctuations, comprised of a dose-titration and long-term safety phase. All participants received SL-APO. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) during the long-term safety phase. Efficacy assessments included the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III (motor examination), assessed at weeks 24, 36 and 48 during the first year of the long-term safety phase.

RESULTS

496 patients were included and 120 (24.2%) completed the long-term safety phase. Mean duration of SL-APO exposure was 294.3 days. TEAEs related to study drug were experienced by 65.3% of patients (most common: nausea [6.0%], stomatitis [1.8%], lip swelling [1.8%], dizziness [1.6%], oral mucosal erythema [1.6%], mouth ulceration [1.6%]). TEAEs leading to study drug withdrawal were experienced by 34.0% of patients (most common: nausea [5.4%], lip swelling [4.5%], mouth ulceration [2.6%], stomatitis [2.3%]). A clinically meaningful reduction in MDS-UPDRS part III score was observed as soon as 15 min following administration of SL-APO, with peak effects observed approximately 30 min post-dose and sustained up to 90 min post-dose; results were consistent over 48 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

SL-APO was generally well tolerated and efficacious over the long term as an on-demand treatment for OFF episodes in patients with PD.

Sublingual apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Advanced Parkinson´s disease (PD) is often complicated by fluctuations of disability depending on plasma levels of levodopa. For most patients OFF phases with worsening of tremor and immobility, but also pain, depression, autonomic symptoms are troublesome. While adjustments of levodopa administrations can relief such fluctuations for some time, "on demand" therapies become more and more important. These "on demand" therapies should provide fast and efficacious relief. During the past years, new options for on demand therapies in PD-associated OFF episodes have been developed, including new formulations of levodopa and apomorphine to provide fast and readily accessible on demand treatment. In this narrative review, the challenges of the treatment of PD-associated fluctuations and OFF states are addressed, with a special focus on sublingual apomorphine (SL-APO) including the results from recent clinical trials.

Sublingual apomorphine in treatment of Parkinson's disease: a review

PURPOSE

A majority of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients on oral levodopa experience motor fluctuations, including sudden OFF and delayed ON periods. Fast-acting rescue medications are a vital part of the clinician's armamentarium in the treatment of motor fluctuations. Sublingual apomorphine is the first sublingual rescue medication on the market for the treatment of OFF times in PD.Materials and Methods: Here, we review the development and pharmacology of apomorphine in the treatment of PD as well as the safety and efficacy of sublingual apomorphine established in clinical trials. Finally, we compare sublingual apomorphine to the other rescue medications available and provide our opinion on the use of sublingual apomorphine in clinical practice.Results: Clinical trials have demonstrated that sublingual apomorphine is a safe and effective option in the treatment of motor fluctuations in PD. In a Phase II trial, 100% of patients who achieved a full ON response did so within 30 min and 40% did so within 15 min. The mean duration of effect was 50 min. In a Phase III trial, 77.3% of patients achieved a full ON response. Side effects such as nausea, dizziness and somnolence were common but were generally mild. No patients experienced worsening dyskinesia.Conclusions: Sublingual apomorphine will provide patients with motor fluctuations due to advanced PD another safe and effective option for the treatment of OFF times.

Medical, surgical, and physical treatments for Parkinson's disease

Although dopamine replacement therapy remains a core component of Parkinson's disease treatment, the onset of motor fluctuations and dyskinetic movements might require a range of medical and surgical approaches from a multidisciplinary team, and important new approaches in the delivery of dopamine replacement are becoming available. The more challenging, wide range of non-motor symptoms can also have a major impact on the quality of life of a patient with Parkinson's disease, and requires careful multidisciplinary management using evidence-based knowledge, as well as appropriately tailored strategies according to the individual patient's needs. Disease-modifying therapies are urgently needed to prevent the development of the most disabling refractory symptoms, including gait and balance difficulties, cognitive impairment and dementia, and speech and swallowing impairments. In the third paper in this Series, we present the latest evidence supporting the optimal treatment of Parkinson's disease, and describe an expert approach to many aspects of treatment choice where an evidence base is insufficient.

Apomorphine for Parkinson's disease: pharmacologic and clinical considerations

INTRODUCTION

In Parkinson's disease, dopamine depletion in the basal ganglia leads to symptoms including bradykinesia, gait abnormalities, and cognitive impairment. Even with treatment, the disease course leads to decreases in the amount of dopamine produced and released into the synapse. As dopamine production falls and the treatment course is insufficient to match the metabolic supply and demand, acute 'off' periods develop that cause reemergence of symptoms. Apomorphine is used to reverse these 'off' periods and restore function in patients with Parkinson's. This review will provide clinicians a concise article to read to learn more about apomorphine and its appropriate utilization.

AREAS COVERED

The research discussed is focused on the history, pharmacokinetics, and mechanism of action of Apomorphine. Its utilization as a treatment for Parkinson's Disease and its comparison to currently utilized drugs is also discussed in this review. We focused on articles published on PubMed and Google Scholar within the last 10 years, but in some instances had to go as far back as 1951 to include early articles published about apomorphine.

EXPERT OPINION

The expert opinion section focuses on the ways in which apomorphine could be administered in the future to better promote utilization and increase tolerability.

Management of OFF condition in Parkinson disease

Parkinson disease (PD) impacts nearly 1 million individuals in the United States. Nearly every patient with PD will require therapy with dopamine in the form of levodopa as the disease progresses. In more advanced stages of the disease, patients will experience motor fluctuations and require adjustment to their medication regimens to maintain good control of their symptoms. During the last 10 years, several new therapeutic treatment options have come to the market to treat motor fluctuations and improve patient quality of life. Some of these agents represent additional options to previously available drug classes, such as the catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitor, opicapone, and monoamine-oxidase B-inhibitor (MAO-B inhibitor), safinamide, as well as new dosage forms for available therapeutics. One new agent, istradefylline, has a novel mechanism in the treatment of PD. The place in therapy for these newer therapeutic options will be explored through a series of patient cases. This article focuses on evidence-based recommendations for the use of these newer options in the management of patients experiencing OFF episodes.

Importance of time to ON versus wearing OFF in total daily OFF time experienced by patients with Parkinson's disease

Most patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) receiving levodopa (LD)/DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors develop motor fluctuations with an increasing amount of OFF time, negatively impacting patient quality of life. Herein, we review the evidence supporting the substantial, yet underappreciated contribution of delays in time to ON (including delayed ON and no ON) to total daily OFF time. Most clinical studies use patient diaries that do not capture time to ON and wearing OFF separately as related to LD dosing, and consequently, most OFF time has generally been attributed to wearing OFF. Hence, most treatment regimens focus on reducing wearing OFF by changing LD dosing/formulations and/or using "ON-extenders" (eg, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors, extended-release amantadine, and adenosine A2A receptor antagonists). However, the literature describing approved treatments for PD that has focused on delays in time to ON is sparse and suggests this type of OFF may comprise more than twice the amount of total daily OFF time as wearing OFF. Here, we advocate for the importance of measuring and adequately addressing delays in time to ON and build support for the consistent inclusion of the time to ON measurement in future clinical trials.

Clinical Use of On-Demand Therapies for Patients with Parkinson's Disease and OFF Periods

On-demand therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD) provide rapid, reliable relief for patients experiencing OFF periods; however, practical guidelines on the use of these therapies are not generally available. This paper reviews the use of on-demand treatments. Motor fluctuations occur in nearly all patients with PD after long-term use of levodopa. As the goal of PD treatment is to provide good ON time, on-demand treatments that have a more rapid reliable onset than the slower-acting oral medications provide rapid relief for OFF periods. All current on-demand treatments bypass the gastrointestinal tract, providing dopaminergic therapy directly into the blood stream by subcutaneous injection, through the buccal mucosa, or by inhalation into the pulmonary circulation. On-demand treatments are fast acting (10- to 20-min onset), with maximum, reliable, and significant responses reached within 30 min after administration. Oral medications pass through the gastrointestinal tract and thus have slower absorption owing to gastroparesis and competition with food. On-demand therapies, by providing fast-acting relief, can have a positive impact on a patient's quality of life when patients are experiencing OFF periods.

Safety review of current pharmacotherapies for levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Levodopa remains the gold standard for treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients develop complications with disease progression, necessitating adjunctive therapy to control fluctuations in motor and non-motor symptoms and dyskinesia. Knowledge of medication safety and tolerability is critical to ascertain the benefit-risk ratio and select an adjunctive therapy that provides the highest chance for medication adherence. Posing a challenge are the sheer abundance of options, stemming from the development of several new drugs in recent years, as well as differences in commercial drug availability worldwide.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of current US FDA-approved pharmacotherapies for levodopa-treated PD patients, including dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist amantadine, and the adenosine receptor antagonist istradefylline. Data were taken from pivotal phase III randomized controlled and post-surveillance studies, when available, that directly led to FDA-approval.

EXPERT OPINION

No strong evidence exists to support use of a specific adjunctive treatment for improving Off time. Only one medication has demonstrated improvement in dyskinesia in levodopa-treated PD patients; however, every patient cannot tolerate it and therefore adjunctive therapy should be tailored to an individual's symptoms and risk for specific adverse effects.

Distinct cortical and subcortical predictors of Purdue Pegboard decline in Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonism

Objective measures of disease progression are critically needed in research on Parkinson's disease (PD) and atypical Parkinsonism but may be hindered by both practicality and cost. The Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) is objective, has high test-retest reliability, and has a low cost. The goals of this study were to determine: (1) longitudinal changes in PPT in a multisite cohort of patients with PD, atypical Parkinsonism, and healthy controls; (2) whether PPT performance reflects brain pathology revealed by neuroimaging; (3) quantify kinematic deficits shown by PD patients during PPT. Parkinsonian patients showed a decline in PPT performance that correlated with motor symptom progression, which was not seen in controls. Neuroimaging measures from basal ganglia were significant predictors of PPT performance in PD, whereas cortical, basal ganglia, and cerebellar regions were predictors for atypical Parkinsonism. Accelerometry in a subset of PD patients showed a diminished range of acceleration and irregular patterns of acceleration, which correlated with PPT scores.

A review of studies on gut microbiota and levodopa metabolism

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease globally. Levodopa (L-dopa) has been the cornerstone for treating Parkinson's since the 1960s. However, complications such as "wearing-off" and dyskinesia inevitably appear with disease progression. With the further development of microbiomics in recent years, It has been recognized that gut microbiota plays a crucial role in Parkinson's disease pathogenesis. However, Little is known about the impact of gut microbiota in PD treatment, especially in levodopa metabolism. This review examines the possible mechanisms of gut microbiota, such as Helicobacter pylori, Enterobacter faecalis, and Clostridium sporogenes, affecting L-dopa absorption. Furthermore, we review the current status of gut microbiota intervention strategies, providing new insights into the treatment of PD.

Inhaled levodopa for threatening impending OFF episodes in managing Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that leads to the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons resulting in a widespread pathology of motor and non-motor symptoms. Oral levodopa remains the most effective symptomatic treatment of PD, but motor complications such as Off episodes occur over time. The spectrum of manifestation of OFF episodes varies, e.g., early morning akinesia, end-of-dose wearing OFF, delayed ON, suboptimal ON and dose failure. The functional disability substantially impacts the quality of life for PD patients. An innovative on-demand therapy to treat Off episodes was approved for patients receiving oral levodopa/dopa deacarboxylase inhibitor: inhaled levodopa powder (Inbrija®). The pulmonary delivery of inhaled levodopa powder provides a predictable and fast treatment effect, independent of gastrointestinal dysfunctions or food intake, which could affect levodopa absorption. Levodopa is administered with a breath-actuated inhaler device and the approved dose is 84 mg per Off episode. During the pivotal SPAN-PD phase III trial, significant improvement in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale III score was measured 30 min post-dose at week 12. Improvement was already seen for the first measured time point 10 min post-dose. No differences in pulmonary function was observed when using inhaled levodopa powder regularly for up to 12 months. Inhaled levodopa powder was also approved for early morning Off episodes. The aim of this review article is to give an overview of the different clinical studies of the innovative inhaled levodopa powder, a new on-demand therapy to treat Off episodes in PD.

Parkinson's disease therapy: what lies ahead?

The worldwide prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been constantly increasing in the last decades. With rising life expectancy, a longer disease duration in PD patients is observed, further increasing the need and socioeconomic importance of adequate PD treatment. Today, PD is exclusively treated symptomatically, mainly by dopaminergic stimulation, while efforts to modify disease progression could not yet be translated to the clinics. New formulations of approved drugs and treatment options of motor fluctuations in advanced stages accompanied by telehealth monitoring have improved PD patients care. In addition, continuous improvement in the understanding of PD disease mechanisms resulted in the identification of new pharmacological targets. Applying novel trial designs, targeting of pre-symptomatic disease stages, and the acknowledgment of PD heterogeneity raise hopes to overcome past failures in the development of drugs for disease modification. In this review, we address these recent developments and venture a glimpse into the future of PD therapy in the years to come.

Drugs to the Rescue: Comparison of On-Demand Therapies for OFF Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease

Patients with Parkinson's disease often suffer from OFF symptoms disrupting their daily routines and adding to disabilities. Despite polypharmacy and adjustments to medication schedules, they often do not experience consistent relief from their motor symptoms. As the disease progresses, impaired gastric emptying may evolve, making it even more challenging for dopaminergic drugs to provide consistent results. This review focuses on a group of drugs that have the pharmacokinetic advantage of a much earlier onset of action by virtue of their non-oral routes of absorption. We compare the current marketed options: subcutaneous apomorphine, sublingual apomorphine, and inhaled levodopa. Subcutaneous apomorphine is the speediest to take effect, whereas sublingual apomorphine offers the longest clinical effect. Inhaled levodopa has the most favorable side effect profile among the three options. An inhaled form of apomorphine is currently under development, having passed safety and efficacy studies. Each of these drugs has unique characteristics for the user, including different side effect profiles and onset of action. The best choice for a patient will depend on individual needs and circumstances. In this review, we explore those nuances to allow clinicians to select the best option for their patients.

The Clinical Development of Levodopa Inhalation Powder

ABSTRACT

Oral levodopa is the most effective treatment for Parkinson disease, but OFF periods emerge over time. Gastrointestinal dysfunction and food effects impact levodopa absorption, contributing to unpredictable control of OFF periods. Inhaled levodopa powder (Inbrija) is approved for on-demand treatment of OFF periods in patients receiving oral levodopa-dopa decarboxylase inhibitors. The 84-mg dose is administered via a breath-actuated inhaler. It provides pulmonary delivery of levodopa to the systemic circulation and is taken when a patient has an OFF period in between doses of regular oral levodopa medication. The pivotal SPAN-PD trial in patients experiencing OFF periods on oral dopaminergic therapy showed that levodopa inhalation powder 84 mg produced significant improvement in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III score, as measured 30 minutes postdose at week 12, and improvement was seen as early as 10 minutes. More patients in the levodopa inhalation powder group turned ON within 60 minutes of treatment and remained ON at 60 minutes than in the placebo group. Levodopa inhalation powder can also be used to treat early-morning OFF periods and, when used for up to 12 months, produced no clinically significant differences in pulmonary function compared with an untreated cohort. Levodopa inhalation powder 84 mg increased plasma levodopa concentration rapidly and with less variability than oral levodopa/carbidopa (25/100 mg). Most common adverse event associated with levodopa inhalation powder is cough, found in ~15% of patients in the SPAN-PD trial; otherwise, reported adverse events were consistent with those known to be associated with oral levodopa.

Electroacupuncture for motor dysfunction and constipation in patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised controlled multi-centre trial

BACKGROUND

Motor disturbances and non-motor disturbances such as constipation are the main factors affecting the quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We investigated the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture combined with conventional pharmacological treatment on motor dysfunction and constipation in PD.

METHODS

In this multi-centre randomised controlled trial, we enrolled 166 eligible participants between September 19, 2018 and September 25, 2019 in four hospitals in China. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the electroacupuncture (EA) group and the waitlist control group. Each participant in both groups received the conventional pharmacological treatment, EA group received 3 sessions of electroacupuncture per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score from baseline to week 12. The secondary outcomes included the evaluation of functional disability in motor symptoms and constipation, the adherence and adverse events were also recorded. Registered with Chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1800019517.

FINDINGS

At week 12, the change in the UPDRS score of the EA group was significantly higher than that of the control group, with a difference of -9.1 points (95% CI, -11.8 to -6.4), and this difference continued into weeks 16 and 24. From baseline to week 12, the 39-item Parkinson Disease Question (PDQ-39) decreased by 10 points (interquartile range, IQR -26.0 to 0.0) in the EA group and 2.5 points (IQR: -11.0 to 4.0) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant. The time and steps for the 20-m walk at week 12, as well as the changes from baseline in the EA group, were comparable with that in the control group. But the EA group had a greater decrease than the control group from baseline in the times for 20-m walks at weeks 16 and 24. From week 4 to week 24, the median values of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week in the EA group were higher than that in the control group, the differences were all statistically significant. The incidence of EA-related adverse events during treatment was low, and they are mild and transient.

INTERPRETATION

The findings of our study suggested that compared with conventional pharmacological treatment, conventional pharmacological treatment combined with electroacupuncture significantly enhances motor function and increased bowel movements in patients with PD, electroacupuncture is a safe and effective treatment for PD.

FUNDING

Shanghai "Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan" Clinical Medicine Field Project (18401970700), Shanghai Special Project on Aging and Women's and Children's Health Research (020YJZX0134), Shanghai Clinical Research Centre for Acupuncture and Moxibustion (20MC1920500).

[Parkinson's disease]

Parkinson's disease (PD) is an unparalleled example of a neurodegenerative disorder that can be effectively managed leading to sustained symptom control and quality of life. The cooperation of neurologists with general practitioners, gastroenterologists, and geriatricians is of increasing importance for an optimized management of PD. New diagnostic criteria for PD and for atypical Parkinsonism, which should be considered in the differential diagnostics, include non-motor symptoms and aim to diagnose these disorders as early as possible. Recent research has shown that there are highly complex and clinically relevant interactions with PD at all levels of the gastrointestinal tract, which have been increasingly better understood and have direct clinical relevance. Novel dopaminergic treatment approaches focus on circumvention of the impaired gastrointestinal tract of PD patients. The management of geriatric PD patients and PD dementia requires specific clinical knowledge. Worldwide, PD has emerged as a model disease for the development of network structures for the treatment of chronic neurological diseases.

Off-time Treatment Options for Parkinson's Disease

Motor fluctuations (MF) are deemed by patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) as the most troublesome disease feature resulting from the increasing impairment in responsiveness to dopaminergic drug treatments. MF are characterized by the loss of a stable response to levodopa over the nychthemeron with the reappearance of motor (and non-motor) parkinsonian clinical signs at various moments during the day and night. They normally appear after a few years of levodopa treatment and with a variable, though overall increasing severity, over the disease course. The armamentarium of first-line treatment options has widened in the last decade with new once-a-daily compounds, including a catechol O-methyltransferase inhibitor - Opicapone-, two MAO-B inhibitors plus channel blocker - Zonisamide and Safinamide and one amantadine extended-release formulation - ADS5012. In addition to apomorphine injection or oral levodopa dispersible tablets, which have been available for a long time, new on-demand therapies such as apomorphine sublingual or levodopa inhaled formulations have recently shown efficacy as rescue therapies for Off-time treatment. When the management of MF becomes difficult in spite of oral/on-demand options, more complex therapies should be considered, including surgical, i.e. deep brain stimulation, or device-aided therapies with pump systems delivering continuous subcutaneous or intestinal levodopa or subcutaneous apomorphine formulation. Older and less commonly used ablative techniques (radiofrequency pallidotomy) may also be effective while there is still scarce data regarding Off-time reduction using a new lesional approach, i.e. magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. The choice between the different advanced therapies options is a shared decision that should consider physician opinion on contraindication/main target symptom, patients' preference, caregiver's availability together with public health systems and socio-economic environment. The choice of the right/first add-on treatment is still a matter of debate as well as the proper time for an advanced therapy to be considered. In this narrative review, we discuss all the above cited aspects of MF in patients with PD, including their phenomenology, management, by means of pharmacological and advanced therapies, on-going clinical trials and future research and treatment perspectives.

Effective Management of "OFF" Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: Emerging Treatment Strategies and Unmet Clinical Needs

Motor complications related to the chronic administration of levodopa and failure to prevent the neurodegenerative disease process counterbalance the pivotal discovery of levodopa as the cornerstone of PD treatment. Excellent motor control is offered early during the course of treatment, but this diminishes as pathological changes in the striatum lead to synaptic dopamine levels becoming completely dependent on exogenous dopamine. This non-physiologic stimulation of dopamine receptors eventually manifests as OFF episodes. As no disease modifying therapy exists for PD that can disrupt these pathological changes, most research and treatment focuses on optimization of dopaminergic stimulation of striatal receptors so that they mimic tonic, physiologic stimulation as closely as possible. Strategies focusing on these challenges have included non-pharmacologic approaches, optimizing levodopa pharmacokinetics, using adjunctive treatments including those with non-dopaminergic mechanisms, and implementing rescue therapies. Device aided therapies, including surgery, are also available. In this review, we will focus on effective management of motor symptoms related to OFF periods, including emerging strategies. Unmet clinical needs will be discussed, including non-motor symptoms, targeted molecular therapies and disease modifying therapy.

Recent Advances in Drug Therapy for Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease manifesting with motor and non-motor symptoms. Current treatment mainly relies on medication as a symptomatic therapy modulating neurotransmitters. Dopamine replacement therapy has been established, and levodopa is the gold standard for treatment of PD. However, the emergence of motor complications, such as a wearing-off phenomenon, is a clinical problem. Both primary symptoms and motor complications have been targets for the development of treatments for PD. Recent progression in the management of motor complications is supported by newly developed agents and advances in device and formulation technology to deliver drugs continuously. Elucidation of the pathophysiology of PD and the development of disease-modifying therapy that affects the underlying fundamental pathophysiology of the disease are also progressing. In this review, we introduce current knowledge on developments concerning medications for patients with PD.

Optimizing levodopa therapy, when and how? Perspectives on the importance of delivery and the potential for an early combination approach

INTRODUCTION

There is currently a resurgence of levodopa as the initial treatment of choice for most patients with Parkinson's disease, albeit at lower doses than previously used. The addition of adjuvant treatments (including MAO-B inhibitors, COMT inhibitors and dopamine agonists) is an established strategy to reduce motor complications that develop with sustained levodopa therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, the authors discuss the evidence underpinning current levodopa optimization strategies, during early disease and once motor complications occur. To support the discussion, the authors performed a broad PubMed search with the terms 'levodopa/L-dopa/L-Dopa, and Parkinson's disease,' restricted to clinical trials. There is now a wealth of evidence that improving levodopa delivery to the brain improves outcomes and we discuss how agents can be combined earlier in the course of disease to leverage the full potential of this strategy.

EXPERT OPINION

Levodopa remains the cornerstone of antiparkinsonian therapy. Several promising advances in formulation have been made and include novel extended-release oral drugs as well as non-oral delivery systems. However, evidence has long suggested that anti-parkinsonian medications may be better used in combination earlier in the disease, and consequently patients will benefit from low doses of several agents rather than ever larger levodopa doses.

Newly Approved and Investigational Drugs for Motor Symptom Control in Parkinson's Disease

Motor symptoms are a core feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) and cause a significant burden on patients' quality of life. Oral levodopa is still the most effective treatment, however, the motor benefits are countered by inherent pharmacologic limitations of the drug. Additionally, with disease progression, chronic levodopa leads to the appearance of motor complications including motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Furthermore, several motor abnormalities of posture, balance, and gait may become less responsive to levodopa. With these unmet needs and our evolving understanding of the neuroanatomic and pathophysiologic underpinnings of PD, several advances have been made in defining new therapies for motor symptoms. These include newer levodopa formulations and drug delivery systems, refinements in adjunctive medications, and non-dopaminergic treatment strategies. Although some are in early stages of development, these novel treatments potentially widen the available options for the management of motor symptoms allowing clinicians to provide an individually tailored care for PD patients. Here, we review the existing and emerging interventions for PD with focus on newly approved and investigational drugs for motor symptoms, motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and balance and gait dysfunction.

Practical pearls to improve the efficacy and tolerability of levodopa in Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Levodopa is the most effective medication for the treatment of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Several factors may affect the efficacy and tolerability of levodopa. These include the timing, dosage and administration of levodopa, concomitant drugs, food, PD-associated non motor symptoms, and various neurologic and non-neurologic comorbidities. If not appropriately addressed, these issues may limit levodopa efficacy, tolerability, and compliance.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the basics of the metabolism of orally administered levodopa, its side effects, and the factors that may affect its tolerability and efficacy. We provide several practical pearls to improve the tolerability and efficacy of levodopa.

EXPERT OPINION

Protein-rich food delays and reduces levodopa absorption. Hence, levodopa should preferably be administered in a relatively empty stomach. Carbidopa dosing is crucial as it not only enhances the entry of levodopa into the central nervous system, but also reduces levodopa's peripheral adverse effects. Patients experiencing the early side effects such as nausea/vomiting should be prescribed with anti-nausea medications that do not block dopamine receptors. Non-oral routes of administration can be used to obviate persistent gastrointestinal side effects. Implementation of these and other tips may help improve the tolerability and efficacy of levodopa.

Interventions for preventing falls in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Most people with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience at least one fall during the course of their disease. Several interventions designed to reduce falls have been studied. An up-to-date synthesis of evidence for interventions to reduce falls in people with PD will assist with informed decisions regarding fall-prevention interventions for people with PD.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions designed to reduce falls in people with PD.

SEARCH METHODS

CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases and two trials registers were searched on 16 July 2020, together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. We also conducted a top-up search on 13 October 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions that aimed to reduce falls in people with PD and reported the effect on falls. We excluded interventions that aimed to reduce falls due to syncope.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane Review procedures. Primary outcomes were rate of falls and number of people who fell at least once. Secondary outcomes were the number of people sustaining one or more fall-related fractures, quality of life, adverse events and economic outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

This review includes 32 studies with 3370 participants randomised. We included 25 studies of exercise interventions (2700 participants), three studies of medication interventions (242 participants), one study of fall-prevention education (53 participants) and three studies of exercise plus education (375 participants). Overall, participants in the exercise trials and the exercise plus education trials had mild to moderate PD, while participants in the medication trials included those with more advanced disease. All studies had a high or unclear risk of bias in one or more items. Illustrative risks demonstrating the absolute impact of each intervention are presented in the summary of findings tables. Twelve studies compared exercise (all types) with a control intervention (an intervention not thought to reduce falls, such as usual care or sham exercise) in people with mild to moderate PD. Exercise probably reduces the rate of falls by 26% (rate ratio (RaR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.87; 1456 participants, 12 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Exercise probably slightly reduces the number of people experiencing one or more falls by 10% (risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.00; 932 participants, 9 studies; moderate-certainty evidence).  We are uncertain whether exercise makes little or no difference to the number of people experiencing one or more fall-related fractures (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.17; 989 participants, 5 studies; very low-certainty evidence). Exercise may slightly improve health-related quality of life immediately following the intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.17, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.01; 951 participants, 5 studies; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether exercise has an effect on adverse events or whether exercise is a cost-effective intervention for fall prevention. Three studies trialled a cholinesterase inhibitor (rivastigmine or donepezil). Cholinesterase inhibitors may reduce the rate of falls by 50% (RaR 0.50, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.58; 229 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence). However, we are uncertain if this medication makes little or no difference to the number of people experiencing one or more falls (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.14230 participants, 3 studies) and to health-related quality of life (EQ5D Thermometer mean difference (MD) 3.00, 95% CI -3.06 to 9.06; very low-certainty evidence). Cholinesterase inhibitors may increase the rate of non fall-related adverse events by 60% (RaR 1.60, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.01; 175 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). Most adverse events were mild and transient in nature.  No data was available regarding the cost-effectiveness of medication for fall prevention. We are uncertain of the effect of education compared to a control intervention on the number of people who fell at least once (RR 10.89, 95% CI 1.26 to 94.03; 53 participants, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence), and no data were available for the other outcomes of interest for this comparisonWe are also uncertain (very low-certainty evidence) whether exercise combined with education makes little or no difference to the number of falls (RaR 0.46, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.85; 320 participants, 2 studies), the number of people sustaining fall-related fractures (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.40 to 5.32,320 participants, 2 studies), or health-related quality of life (PDQ39 MD 0.05, 95% CI -3.12 to 3.23, 305 participants, 2 studies). Exercise plus education may make little or no difference to the number of people experiencing one or more falls (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.07; 352 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether exercise combined with education has an effect on adverse events or is a cost-effective intervention for fall prevention.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Exercise interventions probably reduce the rate of falls, and probably slightly reduce the number of people falling in people with mild to moderate PD.  Cholinesterase inhibitors may reduce the rate of falls, but we are uncertain if they have an effect on the number of people falling. The decision to use these medications needs to be balanced against the risk of non fall-related adverse events, though these adverse events were predominantly mild or transient in nature. Further research in the form of large, high-quality RCTs are required to determine the relative impact of different types of exercise and different levels of supervision on falls, and how this could be influenced by disease severity. Further work is also needed to increase the certainty of the effects of medication and further explore falls prevention education interventions both delivered alone and in combination with exercise.

Mechanisms of peripheral levodopa resistance in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an increasingly common neurodegenerative condition. The disease has a significant negative impact on quality of life, but a personalized management approach can help reduce disability. Pharmacotherapy with levodopa remains the cornerstone of treatment, and a gratifying and sustained response to this treatment is a supportive criterion that argues in favor of an underlying diagnosis of PD. Yet, in daily practice, it is not uncommon to encounter patients who appear to have true PD, but who nevertheless seem to lose the responsiveness to levodopa (secondary non-responders). Some patients may even fail to respond altogether (primary non-responders). Here, we address how two mechanisms of “peripheral resistance” may underlie this failing response to levodopa in persons with PD. The first explanation relates to impaired bowel motility leading to secondary bacterial overgrowth, and more specifically, to the excessive bacterial production of the enzyme tyrosine decarboxylase (TDC). This enzyme may convert levodopa to dopamine in the gut, thereby hampering entry into the circulation and, subsequently, into the brain. The second explanation relates to the systemic induction of the enzyme aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC), leading to premature conversion of levodopa into dopamine, again limiting the bioavailability within the brain. We discuss these two mechanisms and focus on the clinical implications, potential treatments and directions for future research.

Recent advances in drug delivery to the central nervous system by inhalation

INTRODUCTION

Drugs need to enter the systemic circulation efficiently before they can cross the blood-brain barrier and reach the central nervous system. Although the respiratory tract is not a common route of administration for delivering drugs to the central nervous system, it has attracted increasing interest in recent years for this purpose.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we compare pulmonary delivery to three other common routes (parenteral, oral, and intranasal) for delivering drugs to the central nervous system, followed by summarising the devices used to aerosolise neurological drugs. Recent studies delivering drugs for different neurological disorders via inhalation are then discussed to illustrate the strengths of pulmonary delivery.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent studies provide strong evidence and rationale to support inhaling neurological drugs. Since inhalation can achieve improved pharmacokinetics and rapid onset of action for multiple drugs, it is a non-invasive and efficient method to deliver drugs to the central nervous system. Future research should focus on delivering other small and macro-molecules via the lungs for different neurological conditions.

How I treat Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative condition. Treatment strategies through all stages of disease progression could affect quality of life and influence the development of future complications, making it crucial for the clinician to be on top of the literature.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the current treatment of PD, from early to advanced stages.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted focusing on the treatment of PD, in the different stages of progression.

RESULTS

Every individual with a new diagnosis of PD should be encouraged to start exercising regularly. In the early stage, treatment should focus on using the lowest dose of levodopa or combination therapy that provides maximum functional capacity, and does not increase the risk of complications, such as peak dose dyskinesias and impulse control disorders. At the moderate and advanced stages, motor fluctuations and complications of treatment dominate the picture, making quality of life one important issue. Rehabilitation programs can improve motor symptoms and should be offered to all patients at any stage of disease progression.

CONCLUSION

Many factors need to be considered when deciding on the best treatment strategy for PD, such as disease progression, presence of risk factors for motor and behavioral complications, potential side effects from dopaminergic therapy and phenotypical variabilities. Treatment should focus on functional capacity and quality of life throughout the whole disease course.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple dosing with inhalable apomorphine (AZ-009), and its efficacy in a randomized crossover study in Parkinson's disease patients

INTRODUCTION

Apomorphine is used to treat OFF periods in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. AZ-009 is a novel apomorphine formulation that delivers a thermally-generated aerosol to the deep lung via inhalation with a single breath.

METHODS

Part A was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study investigating the safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple ascending doses of AZ-009. PD patients (n = 24) received placebo or 2, 3 or 4 mg AZ-009 once daily for 5 days, followed by three times daily for 2 days with 2 h between doses. Part B was a double-blind crossover study in 8 PD patients who experience OFF periods. During an OFF state, patients received 4 mg AZ-009 and placebo on two consecutive days in a randomized order. MDS-UPDRS III and ON/OFF state were assessed pre- and post-dose.

RESULTS

Three times daily dosing with 2, 3 and 4 mg AZ-009 was relatively well tolerated with no apparent accumulation or changes in safety profile. Mild and transient throat irritation and cough were reported most often. AZ-009 was rapidly absorbed with median T_max between 1 and 2 min. When corrected for placebo response, the maximum effect of 4 mg AZ-009 based on MDS-UPDRS III scores was observed at 10 and 30 min post-dose with mean (SD) reductions of 6.8 (9.4) and 6.1 (9.1) points respectively. Whereas 0% of patients turned ON after placebo, 50% turned ON 10 min after 4 mg AZ-009 treatment.

CONCLUSION

AZ-009 is rapidly systemically absorbed and safe to dose three times daily. AZ-009 could provide a faster-acting and easier to use formulation than currently available therapies.

New dopaminergic therapies for PD motor complications

BACKGROUND

Motor complications, characterized by "off" periods - when anti-parkinsonian medications are ineffective - and dyskinesia, are the hallmark of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). While levodopa is the gold standard PD medication in terms of efficacy, its short duration of effect coupled with progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons leads to motor complications and fails to treat off periods.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on novel dopaminergic therapies that were recently made clinically available or are currently in development for the treatment of motor complications. First, it will discuss rescue therapies for the treatment of off episodes, including novel apomorphine and levodopa formulations. Second, it will highlight adjunctive dopaminergic medications approved to reduce total daily off time. Third, it will discuss longer-acting levodopa formulations in development and introduce a novel selective dopamine agonist under study. Finally, it will cover novel dopaminergic delivery mechanisms, with specific focus on continuous subcutaneous infusions in development.

SUMMARY

The breadth of dopaminergic therapies recently approved or in development for motor complications, and specifically off time reduction, evokes cautious optimism. Gains in reducing off time with rescue therapies, adjunctive medications or longer-acting levodopa formulations are modest, and underscore the need for more continuous dopaminergic delivery to address the underlying pathophysiology and translate to clinically meaningful improvement in motor complications.

Wearable Electrochemical Sensors in Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder associated with widespread aggregation of α-synuclein and dopaminergic neuronal loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta. As a result, striatal dopaminergic denervation leads to functional changes in the cortico-basal-ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop, which in turn cause most of the parkinsonian signs and symptoms. Despite tremendous advances in the field in the last two decades, the overall management (i.e., diagnosis and follow-up) of patients with PD remains largely based on clinical procedures. Accordingly, a relevant advance in the field would require the development of innovative biomarkers for PD. Recently, the development of miniaturized electrochemical sensors has opened new opportunities in the clinical management of PD thanks to wearable devices able to detect specific biological molecules from various body fluids. We here first summarize the main wearable electrochemical technologies currently available and their possible use as medical devices. Then, we critically discuss the possible strengths and weaknesses of wearable electrochemical devices in the management of chronic diseases including PD. Finally, we speculate about possible future applications of wearable electrochemical sensors in PD, such as the attractive opportunity for personalized closed-loop therapeutic approaches.

Indirect comparison of apomorphine sublingual film and levodopa inhalation powder for Parkinson's disease ‘OFF’ episodes

Aim: To compare efficacy of apomorphine sublingual film (APL) and levodopa inhalation powder (CVT-301) for ‘on-demand’ treatment of Parkinson's disease ‘OFF’ episodes. Patients & methods: Patient-level data from an APL pivotal study were re-weighted to match average baseline characteristics from a CVT-301 study (SPAN-PD). Placebo-adjusted treatments were compared at week 12. Results: Improvements in predose Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III scores were significantly larger for APL versus CVT-301 at 60 min postdose (least squares mean difference-in-difference: -8.82; p = 0.002); difference at 30 min favored APL but was not statistically significant (-4.46; p = 0.103). Total daily ‘OFF’ time reductions were significantly larger for APL versus CVT-301 (-1.31 h; p = 0.013). Conclusion: Results suggest APL treatment may lead to improved efficacy versus CVT-301.

Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier?

•

OFF episodes are common in patients as Parkinson’s disease progresses.

•

OFF episodes are typically managed with “ON-extenders” and changes in levodopa dosing.

•

OFF episodes persist despite conventional treatment.

•

“On-demand” therapies can rapidly improve OFF symptoms.

•

A shift to earlier complementary use of “on-demand” therapies should be considered.

We discuss a shift in the treatment paradigm for OFF episode management in patients with Parkinson’s disease, based on clinical experience in the United States (US). Three “on-demand” treatments are currently available in the US as follows: subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa inhalation powder, and sublingual apomorphine. We empirically propose that “on-demand” treatments can be utilized as a complementary treatment when OFF episodes emerge and can be utilized when needed rather than reserving these treatments only until other treatment approaches (adjustment of baseline treatment and/or addition of adjunctive treatment with “ON-extenders”) have failed. Current treatment approaches combine “ON-extenders” with increasing levodopa dosing and/or frequency to treat OFF episodes. Yet, OFF episodes often persist, with a substantial amount of daily OFF time. OFF episode treatment is hindered by variable gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of oral levodopa, reflecting GI dysmotility and protein competition. Novel “on-demand” treatments bypass the gut and can improve OFF symptoms more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. With the emergence of novel “on-demand” treatments, we conclude that a shift in treatment paradigm to the earlier, complementary use of these medications be considered.

The story of levodopa: A long and arduous journey

Levodopa (L-dopa) is the gold standard in the management of Parkinson's disease (PD). It dates back to 1500 to 1000 BC when it was used in the Indian Ayurvedic and Chinese system of medicine. Certain beans such as velvet beans and broad beans contain L-dopa. The plant Mucuna pruriens (Mp) or velvet bean, cultivated in Eastern India and Southern China, contains L-dopa at a concentration of 5% and was used for the management of PD. Later, workers have documented the neuroprotective, neurorestorative, and immunomodulatory properties of Mp. Double-blind studies conducted in the Western world have proved the efficacy of Mp and reported some toxic side effects as well. In the Western world, the credit for isolating L-dopa from the seeds of Vicia faba or broad bean goes to Markus Guggenheim, a biochemist from Sweden in 1913. However, it has been used with success ever since Arvid Carlsson established the reversibility of reserpine-induced akinesia in rabbits in the late 1950s with the use of intravenous dopamine, and Oleh Hornykiewicz demonstrated its deficiency in the striatum in 1960–1961. George Cotzias used it in patients in a low and slow incremental fashion in 1967, and Melvin Yahr and his colleagues performed double-blind study on in-patients with success in 1969. Complications with its long-term use, particularly the on-off phenomenon, and dyskinesias appeared soon, and measures have been undertaken to reduce their incidence. Researches on alternative modes of delivery are carried out in various centers, and others are under investigation in the laboratories.

Inhaled Levodopa (CVT-301) for the Treatment of Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose

of Review: To investigate the efficacy and safety of CVT-301 for motor fluctuation in Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Recent Findings:

This study demonstrated that the CVT-301 group had a higher proportion of patients achieving an ON state than the placebo group (OR=2.68; 95% CI: 1.86-3.86; p<0.00001). Moreover, CVT-301 had also shown to improve motor function by UPDRS-III score (SMD=3.83; 95% CI: 2.44-5.23; p<0.00001) and promote an overall improvement of PD by PGIC self-rating (OR=2.95; 95% CI: 1.78-4.9; p<0.00001). The most common adverse events encountered were respiratory symptoms (OR=12.18; 95% CI: 5.01-29.62; p<0.00001) and nausea (OR=3.95; 95% CI: 1.01-15.41; p=0.05).

Summary:

CVT-301 had the potential to be an alternative or even a preferred treatment for motor fluctuation in PD patients.

A technology evaluation of CVT-301 (Inbrija): an inhalable therapy for treatment of Parkinson's disease

Introduction: The most widely used pharmacological treatment for Parkinson's disease is levodopa, the precursor for dopamine formation in the brain. Over time, the effectiveness of levodopa declines, and patients experience motor fluctuations, or OFF periods. A levodopa formulation administered via a capsule-based oral inhaler provides a new delivery mechanism for levodopa that provides rapid relief of OFF periods.Areas covered: CVT-301 is a dry powder formulation designed to supply levodopa to the systemic circulation via pulmonary absorption. The technology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety data of this formulation are presented.Expert opinion: Oral inhalation is a novel method of administration for levodopa that bypasses the gastrointestinal tract, allowing levodopa to enter the systemic circulation rapidly and more reliably than oral medications. Gastrointestinal dysfunction, a common feature of Parkinson's disease, can lead to impaired absorption of oral medications. Pulmonary delivery rapidly elevates levodopa plasma concentrations to provide relief of OFF periods for patients receiving oral levodopa.

On-Demand Therapy for OFF Episodes in Parkinson's Disease

Levodopa is the most effective therapy for Parkinson's disease; however, chronic treatment is associated with the development of OFF episodes, in which there is a return of parkinsonian features following a dose of levodopa and prior to the onset of benefit from the subsequent dose. OFF episodes can be a major source of disability for PD patients and frequently result in depression, apathy and an unwillingness to participate in social activities. Most currently available medical and surgical therapies are designed to reduce total daily OFF time but do not provide a rapid and reliable "on-demand" therapy for individual OFF episodes. Indeed, responses to individual doses of levodopa during an acute OFF episode are unreliable, frequently leading to partial-ON, delayed-ON, or no-ON responses even at different times in the same patient. There are now 3 therapies that are available for the on-demand treatment of OFF episodes; subcutaneous injection of apomorphine, sublingual apomorphine film, and inhaled levodopa. The first has not enjoyed widespread use in the PD community, whereas the latter 2 therapies have only recently been approved. This review will consider the currently available on-demand therapies and their potential advantages and disadvantages. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Reappraisal of metabolic dysfunction in neurodegeneration: Focus on mitochondrial function and calcium signaling

The cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive neurodegeneration remain poorly defined. Recent clinical trial failures, difficult diagnosis, uncertain etiology, and lack of curative therapies prompted us to re-examine other hypotheses of neurodegenerative pathogenesis. Recent reports establish that mitochondrial and calcium dysregulation occur early in many neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, and others. However, causal molecular evidence of mitochondrial and metabolic contributions to pathogenesis remains insufficient. Here we summarize the data supporting the hypothesis that mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction result from diverse etiologies of neuropathology. We provide a current and comprehensive review of the literature and interpret that defective mitochondrial metabolism is upstream and primary to protein aggregation and other dogmatic hypotheses of NDDs. Finally, we identify gaps in knowledge and propose therapeutic modulation of mCa2+ exchange and mitochondrial function to alleviate metabolic impairments and treat NDDs.

Emerging Pharmacotherapies for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second commonest neurodegenerative disorder in the older adult and is characterized by progressive disabling motor symptoms of bradykinesia, tremor, rigidity, postural instability and also non motor symptoms that affect quality of life. The pharmacotherapy of PD consists of oral, transdermal, and subcutaneous medications, as well as invasive advanced therapies at later stages of the disease. PD medications are often started as monotherapy but with the progression of the illness often there is a need to add more medications and frequently comprises of a challenging polypharmacotherapy. Adverse effects of pharmacotherapy often add to the problems of adequate treatment. Patients and physicians have to prioritize treatment goals on the most disabling symptoms and the safest and most effective treatments. Almost every year newer medications and modes of delivery continue to be researched and added to the therapeutic armamentarium. This review article outlines existing and emerging pharmacotherapies for motor symptoms in PD.

An Update on Medical and Surgical Treatments of Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta and other neuronal populations. The worldwide prevalence of PD is over 7 million and has been increasing more rapidly than many other neurodegenerative disorders. PD symptoms can be broadly divided into motor (slowness, stiffness, tremor) and non-motor symptoms (such as depression, dementia, psychosis, orthostatic hypotension). Patients can also have prodromal symptoms of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, hyposmia, and constipation. The diagnosis of PD is mainly clinical, but dopamine transporter single-photon emission computed tomography can improve the accuracy of the diagnosis. Dopamine based therapies are used for the treatment of motor symptoms. Non-motor symptoms are treated with other medications such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (depression/anxiety), acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (dementia), and atypical antipsychotics (psychosis). Patients with motor fluctuations or uncontrolled tremor, benefit from deep brain stimulation. Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel is an alternative to deep brain stimulation for uncontrolled motor fluctuations. Rehabilitative therapies such as physical, occupational, and speech therapy are important during all stages of the disease. Management of PD is complex but there have been significant advancements in the treatment of motor and non-motor symptoms over the past few years. This review discusses the updates in the medical and surgical management of PD.

On demand therapy for Parkinson's disease patients: Opportunities and choices

Levodopa is the most effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), but a major treatment challenge is that over time, many patients experience periods of return of PD symptoms intermittently through the day, known as OFF periods. OFF periods typically manifest as a return of motor symptoms but can also involve non-motor symptoms and these periods can disrupt good control despite optimization of the oral levodopa regimen. OFF periods emerge in large measure due to a shortening of the duration of clinical benefit from oral levodopa, thought to be related to a progressive loss of dopamine neurons and their ability to store and release levodopa-derived dopamine over many hours. The problem is further compounded by impaired absorption of oral levodopa due to gastroparesis and other factors limiting its uptake in the small intestine, including competition for uptake by meals and their protein content. On-demand therapies are now available for the treatment of OFF episodes in PD and are administered intermittently, on an as-needed basis, on top of the patient's maintenance medication regimen. To be useful, an on-demand medication should take effect more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. Options for on-demand therapy for OFF periods have recently increased with the approval of levodopa inhalation powder and sublingual apomorphine as alternatives to the older option of subcutaneous apomorphine injection, each of which avoids the gastrointestinal tract and its potential for absorption delay. On-demand therapy is now available for patients experiencing episodic or intermittent need for rapid and reliable onset of benefit. On-demand therapy may also provide an alternative to more invasive treatment such as infusion of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel and for patients whose OFF episodes are not controlled despite deep brain stimulation.

Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease is a recognisable clinical syndrome with a range of causes and clinical presentations. Parkinson's disease represents a fast-growing neurodegenerative condition; the rising prevalence worldwide resembles the many characteristics typically observed during a pandemic, except for an infectious cause. In most populations, 3-5% of Parkinson's disease is explained by genetic causes linked to known Parkinson's disease genes, thus representing monogenic Parkinson's disease, whereas 90 genetic risk variants collectively explain 16-36% of the heritable risk of non-monogenic Parkinson's disease. Additional causal associations include having a relative with Parkinson's disease or tremor, constipation, and being a non-smoker, each at least doubling the risk of Parkinson's disease. The diagnosis is clinically based; ancillary testing is reserved for people with an atypical presentation. Current criteria define Parkinson's disease as the presence of bradykinesia combined with either rest tremor, rigidity, or both. However, the clinical presentation is multifaceted and includes many non-motor symptoms. Prognostic counselling is guided by awareness of disease subtypes. Clinically manifest Parkinson's disease is preceded by a potentially long prodromal period. Presently, establishment of prodromal symptoms has no clinical implications other than symptom suppression, although recognition of prodromal parkinsonism will probably have consequences when disease-modifying treatments become available. Treatment goals vary from person to person, emphasising the need for personalised management. There is no reason to postpone symptomatic treatment in people developing disability due to Parkinson's disease. Levodopa is the most common medication used as first-line therapy. Optimal management should start at diagnosis and requires a multidisciplinary team approach, including a growing repertoire of non-pharmacological interventions. At present, no therapy can slow down or arrest the progression of Parkinson's disease, but informed by new insights in genetic causes and mechanisms of neuronal death, several promising strategies are being tested for disease-modifying potential. With the perspective of people with Parkinson's disease as a so-called red thread throughout this Seminar, we will show how personalised management of Parkinson's disease can be optimised.

An evaluation of the efficacy and value of CVT-301 for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Introduction: Levodopa is the most effective drug in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, but its chronic treatment is linked to the occurrence of motor complications with fluctuations of motor performance and dyskinesia. Unpredictable OFF episodes can be severe and disabling and current rescue medications cannot always be used safely. Rescue therapy is characterized by a rapid and predictable ON response and the safety profile of levodopa will represent a major advantage for patients affected by unresponsive OFF episodes.Areas covered: CVT-301 is a new inhaled formulation of LD recently developed as a self-administered treatment for OFF periods. Herein, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, and safety of CVT-301 are reviewed.Expert opinion: CVT-301 may offer several potential advantages including increased systemic bioavailability through pulmonary absorption, rapid onset of action, avoidance of first-pass drug metabolism, and less plasma level variability. It should be noted that the delivery device used has been described as relatively simple to use, but the few steps required to prepare and self-administer the dose can be challenging for PD patients during their OFF state. Additionally, resolution of an OFF episode requires the administration of two capsules of CVT-301, which further complicates the use of the device.

Update on Parkinson's Disease Therapy

Collapse

Levodopa Inhalation Powder: A Review in Parkinson's Disease

Levodopa inhalation powder (Inbrija^®) is approved for the intermittent treatment of OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with levodopa/dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (LD-DCI) in the EU and specifically with carbidopa/levodopa in the USA. The approved dosage is 84 mg taken as needed up to five times a day. Administered via a breath-actuated inhaler, this formulation enables levodopa to bypass the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and, instead, rapidly enter the bloodstream through the pulmonary system. In the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III SPAN-PD trial, as-needed levodopa inhalation powder 84 mg improved motor symptoms during OFF periods in PD patients (aged 30-86 years) treated with levodopa and carbidopa or benserazide. The likelihood of achieving an ON state 60 min postdose was significantly higher in the levodopa inhalation powder than the placebo group, with most patients in the levodopa inhalation powder group experiencing improvements in PD symptoms. Findings from longer-term, 52-week phase III studies were consistent with those from the SPAN-PD trial with regards to the treatment of OFF episodes. Levodopa inhalation powder was generally well tolerated and did not noticeably affect pulmonary function in PD patients. Providing a nonintrusive, convenient treatment method, levodopa inhalation powder is a promising option for the intermittent treatment of OFF episodes in patients with PD treated with a LD-DCI.

A critical review of apomorphine hydrochloride sublingual film for the treatment of Parkinson's disease 'OFF' episodes

Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder defined by its motor features. Levodopa therapy is the gold standard therapy, but over time, response is impeded by the development of motor fluctuations, including 'off' episodes where PD symptoms reemerge. Sublingual apomorphine offers a new, novel, and effective therapy developed for treatment of 'off' episodes. Areas covered: Apomorphine is an old dopamine agonist developed as a subcutaneous injectable rescue therapy for 'off' periods in PD that was approved in the United States in 2004. We will discuss its history, chemistry and clinical use. We will also cover the recent development and approval of sublingual apomorphine film that offers a novel formulation and provides effective treatment for 'off' episodes including results of the phase 3 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Oral mucosal side effects, which were mild to moderate and reversible in most patients experiencing them, will be discussed. Expert opinion: The new sublingual apomorphine is safe and effective for relief of 'off' periods that impact quality of life. Its ease of use will be beneficial to those with needle phobia and device challenges with currently available injectable and inhaled therapeutics. Side effect profile is an improvement from previous attempts at sublingual formulation.