Mesenchymal stem cells from the human umbilical cord ameliorate fulminant hepatic failure and increase survival in mice

Multiple Dimensions of using Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treating Liver Diseases: From Bench to Beside

Liver diseases impose a huge burden worldwide. Although hepatocyte transplantation has long been considered as a potential strategy for treating liver diseases, its clinical implementation has created some obvious limitations. As an alternative strategy, cell therapy, particularly mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation, is widely used in treating different liver diseases, including acute liver disease, acute-on-chronic liver failure, hepatitis B/C virus, autoimmune hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we summarize the status of MSC transplantation in treating liver diseases, focusing on the therapeutic mechanisms, including differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells, immunomodulating function with a variety of immune cells, paracrine effects via the secretion of various cytokines and extracellular vesicles, and facilitation of homing and engraftment. Some improved perspectives and current challenges are also addressed. In summary, MSCs have great potential in the treatment of liver diseases based on their multi-faceted characteristics, and more accurate mechanisms and novel therapeutic strategies stemming from MSCs will facilitate clinical practice.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Acute Liver Failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a severe liver disease syndrome with rapid deterioration and high mortality. Liver transplantation is the most effective treatment, but the lack of donor livers and the high cost of transplantation limit its broad application. In recent years, there has been no breakthrough in the treatment of ALF, and the application of stem cells in the treatment of ALF is a crucial research field. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely used in disease treatment research due to their abundant sources, low immunogenicity, and no ethical restrictions. Although MSCs are effective for treating ALF, the application of MSCs to ALF needs to be further studied and optimized. In this review, we discuss the potential mechanisms of MSCs therapy for ALF, summarize some methods to enhance the efficacy of MSCs, and explore optimal approaches for MSC transplantation.

Dose-specific efficacy of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in septic mice

BACKGROUND

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy for sepsis has been extensively studied in the past decade; however, the treatment regimen and mechanism of action of MSCs remain elusive. Here, we attempted to understand the efficacy and mechanism of action of MSCs on rescuing mice with sepsis.

METHODS

A mouse model of sepsis was produced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Allogeneic adipose-derived MSCs (ADSCs) were administered by intravenous infusion at 6 h after CLP, and dose-related effects of ADSCs on these mice were determined by survival rate, histopathological changes, biochemical and coagulation parameters, bacterial load, and plasma levels of endotoxin and inflammatory cytokines. The tissue distribution of intravenously infused ADSCs in septic mice was investigated by pre-labeling ADSCs with the lipophilic membrane dye PKH26. RNA sequencing analysis was performed to assess the transcriptional changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and the liver.

RESULTS

A significant therapeutic effect of ADSCs at a dose of 2 × 10⁷ cells/kg in septic mice was evidenced by a remarkable reduction in mortality (35.89% vs. 8.89% survival rate), blood bacterial burden, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ damage. In contrast, ADSCs at a lower dose (1 × 10⁷ cells/kg) failed to achieve any beneficial outcomes, while ADSCs at a higher dose (4 × 10⁷ cells/kg) caused more early death within 24 h after CLP, retaining a steady survival rate of 21.42% thereafter. PKH26-labeled ADSCs were predominantly localized in the lungs of septic mice after intravenous infusion, with only a smaller proportion of PKH26-positive signals appearing in the liver and spleen. RNA sequencing analysis identified that insufficient phagocytic activity of PBMCs in addition to a hyperactivation of the hepatic immune response was responsible for the ineffectiveness of low-dose ADSCs therapy, and acute death caused by high-dose ADSCs infusion was associated with impaired coagulation signaling in PBMCs and exacerbated hepatic hypoxic injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate a dose-specific effect of ADSCs on the treatment of sepsis due to dose-related interactions between exogenous stem cells and the host's microenvironment. Therefore, a precise dosing regimen is a prerequisite for ADSCs therapy for sepsis.

Amelioration of aflatoxin acute hepatitis rat model by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and their hepatogenic differentiation

Background and Aim:

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) transplantation and their hepatogenic differentiated cells (HDCs) can be applied for liver injury repair by tissue grafting. Regenerative potentiality in liver cirrhosis models was widely investigated; however, immunomodulation and anti-inflammation in acute hepatitis remain unexplored. This study aimed to explore the immunomodulatory and evaluate twice intravenous (IV) or intrahepatic (IH) administration of either BM-MSCs or middle-stage HDCs on aflatoxin (AF) acute hepatitis rat model.

Materials and Methods:

BM-MSCs viability, phenotypes, and proliferation were evaluated. Hepatogenic differentiation, albumin, and mmmmmmmm-fetoprotein gene expression were assessed. AF acute hepatitis was induced in rats using AFB1 supplementation. The transplantation of BM-MSCs or their HDCs was done either by IV or IH route. Hepatic ultrasound was performed after 3-weeks of therapy. Cytokines profile (tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], interleukin [IL]-4, and IL-10) was assessed. Hepatic bio-indices, serum, and hepatic antioxidant activity were evaluated, besides examining liver histological sections.

Results:

Acute AFB1 showed a significant increase in TNF-α (p<0.01), liver enzyme activities (p<0.05), as well as decrease in IL-4, IL-10, and antioxidant enzyme activities (p<0.05). Cytokines profile was ameliorated in groups treated with IV and IH BM-MCs, showed a negative correlation between IL-4 and TNF-α (p<0.05), and a positive correlation between IL-10 upregulation and TNF-α (p<0.01). In IV HDCs treated group, positive correlations between IL-4 and IL-10 downregulation and TNF-α were observed. However, in IH HDCs group, a significant positive correlation between IL-4 and IL-10 upregulation and TNF-α, were recorded (p<0.05). In addition, IV BM-MSCs and IH HDCs treatments significantly increased antioxidant enzymes activity (p<0.05). IV and IH BM-MSCs significantly ameliorated liver transaminase levels, whereas IH HDCs significantly ameliorated alanine aminotransferase activity and nitric oxide concentration (p<0.05).

Conclusion:

The administration routes of BM-MSCs did not demonstrate any significant difference; however, the IH route of HDCs showed significant amelioration from the IV route. On the other hand, it showed noticeable anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory improvements in aflatoxicosis rats. Therefore, it can be concluded that acute hepatitis can be treated by a noninvasive IV route without the expense of hepatogenic differentiation. Further research using clinical trials that address several problems regarding engraftment and potentiation are needed to determine the optimal manipulation strategy as well as to achieve better long term effects.

Application of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Effectively Eliminates Endotoxemia to Protect Rat from Acute Liver Failure Induced by Thioacetamide

BACKGROUND

Endotoxemia is related to worse clinical outcomes in acute liver failure (ALF), but its management remains unsatisfactory. In this study, we aimed to assess whether the application of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) could eliminate endotoxemia and protect rats against ALF induced by thioacetamide (TAA).

METHODS

BMSCs were isolated from rats and identified by the specific morphology, differentiation potential, and surface markers. The optimal dose of TAA for this study was explored and TAA-induced ALF rats were randomized to three groups: the normal control group (Saline), ALF group (TAA + Saline), and BMSCs-treated group (TAA + BMSCs). The intestinal migration and differentiation of BMSCs was tracked in vivo, and intestinal permeability, endotoxin and inflammatory cytokines, histology, and mortality were analyzed. Moreover, we added the inhibitor of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway into the co-culture system of BMSCs with enterocytes and then performed CK and Villin expression experiments to assess the role of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal pathway in the intestinal differentiation of BMSCs.

RESULTS

BMSCs migrated to the intestinal injury sites and differentiated into enterocytes, intestinal permeability was decreased compared with the ALF group. The higher expression of endotoxin and inflammatory cytokines were reversed after BMSCs transplantation in rats with ALF. Mortality and intestinal lesion were significantly decreased. Blocking the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal pathway inhibited BMSCs' intestinal differentiation in vitro.

CONCLUSION

BMSCs can eliminate endotoxemia and reduce mortality in rats with ALF, and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal pathway is involved in intestinal differentiation. BMSCs transplantation could be a potential candidate for the treatment of endotoxemia in ALF.

VEGF165 gene-modified human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells protect against acute liver failure in rats

BACKGROUND

Human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (HUCB-MSCs) can exert a protective effect in rat models of acute liver failure (ALF). Vascular endothelial growth factor 165 (VEGF₁₆₅ ) is the predominant VEGF isoform and possesses a strong pro-angiogenic function. In the present study, HUCB-MSC served as the gene delivery vehicle for the VEGF₁₆₅ gene, and we explored the therapeutic effects of this system on ALF.

METHODS

HUCB-MSCs were infected with an adenovirus expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-VEFG fusion protein (Ad-VEGF₁₆₅ ) to overexpress VEGF₁₆₅ or an adenovirus expressing GFP (Ad-GFP) as control. The control and modified HUCB-MSCs were then transplanted into ALF model rats. Liver function and liver pathological changes were assessed by biochemical tests and liver histology. Immunohistochemistry was carried out to determine the expression of, CD34, Ki67 and VEGF.

RESULTS

VEGF₁₆₅ overexpression enhanced the multipotency of HUCB-MSCs and promoted the homing and colonization of HUCB-MSC in the liver tissues of ALF rats. Furthermore, although HUCB-MSC transplantation ameliorated liver damage and promoted liver regeneration to some extent in ALF rats, Ad-VEGF₁₆₅ -HUCB-MSC transplantation showed stronger therapeutic effects on ALF.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, transplantation of VEGF₁₆₅ -modified HUCB-MSCs exert stronger therapeutic effects on ALF than HUCB-MSCs. The present study provides a novel therapeutic approach for ALF.

Mesenchymal stem cell-based treatment in autoimmune liver diseases: underlying roles, advantages and challenges

Autoimmune liver disease (AILD) is a series of chronic liver diseases with abnormal immune responses, including autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The treatment options for AILD remain limited, and the adverse side effects of the drugs that are typically used for treatment frequently lead to a low quality of life for AILD patients. Moreover, AILD patients may have a poor prognosis, especially those with an incomplete response to first-line treatment. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are pluripotent stem cells with low immunogenicity and can be conveniently harvested. MSC-based therapy is emerging as a promising approach for treating liver diseases based on their advantageous characteristics of immunomodulation, anti-fibrosis effects, and differentiation to hepatocytes, and accumulating evidence has revealed the positive effects of MSC therapy in AILD. In this review, we first summarize the mechanisms, safety, and efficacy of MSC treatment for AILD based on work in animal and clinical studies. We also discuss the challenges of MSC therapy in clinical applications. In summary, although promising data from preclinical studies are now available, MSC therapy is currently far for being applied in clinical practice, thus developing MSC therapy in AILD is still challenging and warrants further research.

Differentiation of Cells Isolated from Afterbirth Tissues into Hepatocyte-Like Cells and Their Potential Clinical Application in Liver Regeneration

Toxic, viral and surgical injuries can pose medical indications for liver transplantation. The number of patients waiting for a liver transplant still increases, but the number of organ donors is insufficient. Hepatocyte transplantation was suggested as a promising alternative to liver transplantation, however, this method has some significant limitations. Currently, afterbirth tissues seem to be an interesting source of cells for the regenerative medicine, because of their unique biological and immunological properties. It has been proven in experimental animal models, that the native stem cells, and to a greater extent, hepatocyte-like cells derived from them and transplanted, can accelerate regenerative processes and restore organ functioning. The effective protocol for obtaining functional mature hepatocytes in vitro is still not defined, but some studies resulted in obtaining functionally active hepatocyte-like cells. In this review, we focused on human stem cells isolated from placenta and umbilical cord, as potent precursors of hepatocyte-like cells for regenerative medicine. We summarized the results of preclinical and clinical studies dealing with the introduction of epithelial and mesenchymal stem cells of the afterbirth origin to the liver failure therapy. It was concluded that the use of native afterbirth epithelial and mesenchymal cells in the treatment of liver failure could support liver function and regeneration. This effect would be enhanced by the use of hepatocyte-like cells obtained from placental and/or umbilical stem cells.

Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for sepsis: a meta-analysis of preclinical studies

Background

Multiple studies have reported that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy has beneficial effects in experimental models of sepsis. However, this finding remains inconclusive. This study was performed to systematically determine the connection between MSC therapy and mortality in sepsis animal models by pooling and analyzing data from newly published studies.

Methods

A detailed search of related studies from 2009 to 2019 was conducted in four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. After browsing and filtering out articles that met the inclusion criteria for statistical analysis, the inverse variance method of the fixed effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Twenty-nine animal studies, including 1266 animals, were identified. None of the studies was judged to have a low risk of bias. The meta-analysis demonstrated that MSC therapy was related to a significantly lower mortality rate (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.22–0.38, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses performed based on the MSC injection dose (< 1.0 × 10⁶ cells, OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.20–0.56, P < 0.001; 1.0 × 10⁶ cells, OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.16–0.35, P < 0.001) and injection time (< 1 h, OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.13–0.45, P < 0.001; 1 h, OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.17–0.46, P < 0.001) demonstrated that treatment with MSCs significantly reduced the mortality rate of animals with sepsis.

Conclusion

This up-to-date meta-analysis showed a connection between MSC therapy and lower mortality in sepsis animal models, supporting the potential therapeutic effect of MSC treatment in future clinical trials. The results in this study contradict a previous meta-analysis with regards to the ideal dose of MSC therapy. Thus, further research is required to support these findings.

Alternative Cell Sources for Liver Parenchyma Repopulation: Where Do We Stand?

Acute and chronic liver failure is a highly prevalent medical condition with high morbidity and mortality. Currently, the therapy is orthotopic liver transplantation. However, in some instances, chiefly in the setting of metabolic diseases, transplantation of individual cells, specifically functional hepatocytes, can be an acceptable alternative. The gold standard for this therapy is the use of primary human hepatocytes, isolated from livers that are not suitable for whole organ transplantations. Unfortunately, primary human hepatocytes are scarcely available, which has led to the evaluation of alternative sources of functional hepatocytes. In this review, we will compare the ability of most of these candidate alternative cell sources to engraft and repopulate the liver of preclinical animal models with the repopulation ability found with primary human hepatocytes. We will discuss the current shortcomings of the different cell types, and some of the next steps that we believe need to be taken to create alternative hepatocyte progeny capable of regenerating the failing liver.

Molecular mechanism underlying the difference in proliferation between placenta-derived and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells

The placenta and umbilical cord are pre-eminent candidate sources of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). However, placenta-derived MSCs (P-MSCs) showed greater proliferation capacity than umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) in our study. We investigated the drivers of this proliferation difference and elucidated the mechanisms of proliferation regulation. Proteomic profiling and Gene Ontology (GO) functional enrichment were conducted to identify candidate proteins that may influence proliferation. Using lentiviral or small interfering RNA infection, we established overexpression and knockdown models and observed changes in cell proliferation to examine whether a relationship exists between the candidate proteins and proliferation capacity. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, western blot analysis, and immunofluorescence assays were conducted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying proliferation. Six candidate proteins were selected based on the results of proteomic profiling and GO functional enrichment. Through further validation, yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) and β-catenin were confirmed to affect MSCs proliferation rates. YAP1 and β-catenin showed increased nuclear colocalization during cell expansion. YAP1 overexpression significantly enhanced proliferation capacity and upregulated the expression of both β-catenin and the transcriptional targets of Wnt signaling, CCND1, and c-MYC, whereas silencing β-catenin attenuated this influence. We found that YAP1 directly interacts with β-catenin in the nucleus to form a transcriptional YAP/β-catenin/TCF4 complex. Our study revealed that YAP1 and β-catenin caused the different proliferation capacities of P-MSCs and UC-MSCs. Mechanism analysis showed that YAP1 stabilized the nuclear β-catenin protein, and also triggered the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, promoting proliferation.

Therapeutic effect of human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells combined with G-CSF on rats with acute liver failure

Human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs) have been used to facilitate healing in animal models of liver injury, while granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been shown to stimulate stem cell mobilization and these cells may contribute to liver repair. hUCB-MSCs were characterized by flow cytometry, and transplanted into rats with d-galactosamine (D-GalN)/lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced acute liver failure (ALF) together with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Liver function, oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines expressions were examined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining was used to observe the morphological changes. Apoptosis was investigated by terminal dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) cell proliferation assay was analyzed by immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry. In the results, cultured hUCB-MSCs displayed proliferation and adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation potentials. hUCB-MSCs in combination with G-CSF significantly attenuated ALF-induced liver function injury. Furthermore, hUCB-MSCs and G-CSF treatment remarkably suppressed the secretions of pro-inflammatory cytokines and MDA activation induced by ALF. In addition, inflammation, lesions and cell apoptosis in liver tissues were obviously ameliorated by application of hUCB-MSCs and G-CSF. In conclusion, hUCB-MSCs, alone or co-treatment with G-CSF could ameliorate ALF in rats by inhibiting liver function injury, production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, and liver cell apoptosis.

Progress in mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for acute liver failure

Acute liver failure is a life-threatening clinical syndrome characterized by rapid development of hepatocellular necrosis leading to high mortality and resource costs. Numerous treatment strategies for acute liver failure simply prevent complications and decelerate disease progression. The only curative treatment for acute liver failure is liver transplantation, but there are many restrictions on the application of liver transplantation. In recent years, a growing number of studies have shown that stem cells can effectively treat acute liver failure. Several types of stem cells have been used to study liver diseases; mesenchymal stem cells are most commonly used because they are easy to obtain and present no ethical problems. The aims of this article are to review the current knowledge regarding therapeutic mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cells in acute liver failure, to discuss recent advancements in preclinical and clinical studies in the treatment of mesenchymal stem cells, and to summarize the methodological improvement of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in treating liver failure.

Bone marrow or adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells: Comparison of the therapeutic potentials in mice model of acute liver failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a lethal disease with limited life-saving therapy. Because lack of whole organ donors for liver transplantation, a substitute treatment strategy is needed for these patients. Preclinical and clinical findings have proved that treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is beneficial for recovery from ALF. In this approach, however, the appropriate sources of these cells are unclear. In the present study, we investigated and compared the therapeutic potentials of bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC) with those of adipose tissue (AT-MSC) in carbon tetrachloride (CCL4)-induced acute liver failure in mice. Murine BM- and AT-MSCs obtained from normal mice were cultured and labelled. The cells were transplanted to CCL4-induced ALF mice models intravenously. After cell transplantation, blood samples and liver tissues were collected daily for 72 h to analyze liver enzymes and liver histopathology, respectively. We found that survival rate of AT-MSC transplanted (AT-TR) mice was significantly higher than that of control (ALF) group. Liver histopathology was superior in the AT-TR mice, but not significantly, compared to that in BM-MSC transplanted (BM-TR) ones. Furthermore, in the AT-TR mice the level of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), in some time points were significantly less than those of BM-TR. Taken together, these data suggest that in comparison to BM-MSC, AT-MSCs is an appropriate choice for cell therapy in the case of acute liver failure.

Evaluating mesenchymal stem cell therapy for sepsis with preclinical meta-analyses prior to initiating a first-in-human trial

Evaluation of preclinical evidence prior to initiating early-phase clinical studies has typically been performed by selecting individual studies in a non-systematic process that may introduce bias. Thus, in preparation for a first-in-human trial of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for septic shock, we applied systematic review methodology to evaluate all published preclinical evidence. We identified 20 controlled comparison experiments (980 animals from 18 publications) of in vivo sepsis models. Meta-analysis demonstrated that MSC treatment of preclinical sepsis significantly reduced mortality over a range of experimental conditions (odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.18–0.40, latest timepoint reported for each study). Risk of bias was unclear as few studies described elements such as randomization and no studies included an appropriately calculated sample size. Moreover, the presence of publication bias resulted in a ~30% overestimate of effect and threats to validity limit the strength of our conclusions. This novel prospective application of systematic review methodology serves as a template to evaluate preclinical evidence prior to initiating first-in-human clinical studies.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17850.001

Most attempts to transform exciting findings from laboratories into clinical treatments are unsuccessful. One reason for this may be the failure to consider all of the laboratory work that has been performed before deciding to test a treatment on patients for the first time. In particular, negative findings (that suggest that a potential new treatment is ineffective) may be overlooked.

Stem cells may help to treat life-threatening infections, but this has not been tested in human patients. However, the effectiveness of stem cell treatments has been tested in animals that act as models of human infection.

Before deciding to begin a clinical trial of stem cell therapy for life-threatening infections, Lalu et al. performed an exhaustive search to find all the studies in which stem cells were used to treat animal models of infection. Combining the results of all of these studies using particular analysis techniques revealed that stem cell therapy increased the survival of these animals overall. These positive effects were seen over a range of different experimental conditions (for example, when treating the animals with different doses of stem cells, or giving the doses at different times).

Lalu et al. also identified some limitations with most of the laboratory studies that had tested stem cell therapy for infections. Many of the studies used animal models that may not be the best representations of humans with severe infection. In addition, many of the scientists did not report that they had used methods (such as randomization) that would generate the most confidence in their results. Despite these limitations, there was a lot of consistency in the reported results.

Overall, the results support the decision to proceed to a clinical trial that tests the effectiveness of stem cells for treating human infections. More generally, Lalu et al.’s analysis demonstrates a way of considering all laboratory evidence before deciding to proceed to a first clinical trial in humans. This may help researchers to identify promising therapies to further develop, and also to identify potential failures before they are tested in patients.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17850.002