Detection of genomic polymorphisms associated with venous thrombosis using the invader biplex assay

The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Prasugrel and Clopidogrel in Healthy Japanese Volunteers

The dosing regimen of prasugrel adjusted for Japanese patients was compared with that of clopidogrel by analyzing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in 40 healthy Japanese subjects in a randomized, single‐blind crossover study. In period 1, the subjects received either 300 mg clopidogrel or 20 mg prasugrel; after a >2‐week interval (period 2), the drug was switched. Blood samples of 36 of the 40 subjects were collected for analysis of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and CYP2C19 genotypes. The plasma concentration of the active metabolite of prasugrel increased rapidly and reached its peak 30 minutes postadministration, whereas that of the active metabolite of clopidogrel reached its peak 1 hour postadministration. The mean AUC and C_max of the active metabolite of clopidogrel, but not those of prasugrel, were CYP2C19 genotype dependent. Prasugrel rapidly inhibited platelet aggregation, reaching its maximum effect 1 hour postadministration. Clopidogrel, on the other hand, showed maximum inhibition 2 hours postadministration. Platelet aggregation inhibition by clopidogrel was significantly lower in the poor‐metabolizer subjects than in the extensive‐metabolizer subjects. Overall, prasugrel inhibited platelet aggregation more rapidly and more effectively in healthy Japanese subjects than was observed for clopidogrel.

PAI-1 4G-4G and MTHFR 677TT in non-hepatitis C virus/hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis

AIM: To evaluate the different roles of thrombophilia in patients with and without viral etiology. The thrombophilic genetic factors (THRGFs), PAI-1 4G-4G, MTHFR 677TT, V Leiden 506Q and prothrombin 20210A, were studied as risk factors in 1079 patients with liver cirrhosis (LC), enrolled from January 2000 to January 2014.

METHODS: All Caucasian LC patients consecutively observed in a fourteen-year period were included; the presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS) was registered. The differences between the proportions of each THRGF with regard to the presence or absence of viral etiology and the frequencies of the THRGF genotypes with those predicted in a population by the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were registered.

RESULTS: Four hundred and seventeen/one thousand and seventy-six patients (38.6%) showed thrombophilia: 217 PAI-1 4G-4G, 176 MTHFR C677TT, 71 V Leiden factor and 41 prothrombin G20210 A, 84 with more than 1 THRGF; 350 presented with no viral liver cirrhosis (NVLC) and 729 with, called viral liver cirrhosis (VLC), of whom 56 patients were hepatitis C virus + hepatitis B virus. PAI-1 4G-4G, MTHFR C677TT, the presence of at least one TRHGF and the presence of > 1 THRGF, were statistically more frequent in patients with NVLC vs patients with VLC: All χ² > 3.85 and P < 0.05. Patients with PVT and/or BCS with at least one TRHGF were 189/352 (53.7%). The Hardy-Weinberg of PAI-1 and MTHFR 677 genotypes deviated from that expected from a population in equilibrium in patients with NVLC (respectively χ² = 39.3; P < 0.000 and χ² = 27.94; P < 0.05), whereas the equilibrium was respected in VLC.

CONCLUSION: MTHFR 677TT was nearly twofold and PAI-1 4G-4G more than threefold more frequently found in NVLC vs patients with VLC; the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of these two polymorphisms confirms this data in NVLC. We suggest that PAI-1 4G-4G and MTHFR 677TT could be considered as factors of fibrosis and thrombosis mechanisms, increasing the inflammation response, and causing the hepatic fibrosis and augmented intrahepatic vascular resistance typical of LC. PAI-1 4G-4G and MTHFR 677TT screening of LC patients could be useful, mainly in those with NVLC, to identify patients in which new drug therapies based on the attenuation of the hepatic stellate cells activation or other mechanisms could be more easily evaluated.

Laboratory informatics based evaluation of methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T genetic test overutilization

Background:

Laboratory data can provide a wide range of information to estimate adherence to guidelines and proper utilization of genetic testing. The methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T variant has been demonstrated to have negligible utility in patient management. However, the testing of this variant remains pervasive. The purpose of this study was to develop methods to analyze concordance of clinician ordering practices with national guidelines.

Methods:

We used laboratory data to extract specific data elements including patient demographics, timestamps, physician ordering logs and temporal relationship to chemistry requests to examine 245 consecutive MTHFR tests ordered in 2011 at an academic tertiary center. A comprehensive chart review was used to identify indications for testing. These results were correlated with a retrospective analysis of 4,226 tests drawn at a range of hospitals requesting testing from a national reference laboratory over a 2-year period. MTHFR ordering practices drawn from 17 institutions were examined longitudinally from 2002 to 2011.

Results:

Indications for testing included cerebrovascular events (40.0%) and venous thrombosis (39.1%). Family history prompted testing in eight cases. Based on acceptable hypercoagulability guidelines recommending MTHFR C677T testing only in the presence of elevated serum homocysteine, 10.6% (22/207) of adult patients met an indicated threshold at an academic tertiary center. Among 77 institutions, 14.5% (613/4226) of MTHFR testing met recommendations.

Conclusion:

We demonstrate an effective method to examine discreet elements of a molecular diagnostics laboratory information system at a tertiary care institution and to correlate these findings at a national level. Retrospective examination of clinicians’ request of MTHFR C677T genetic testing strongly suggests that clinicians have failed to adjust their ordering practices in light of evolving scientific and professional organization recommendations.

Evolving methods for single nucleotide polymorphism detection: Factor V Leiden mutation detection

BACKGROUND

The many techniques used to diagnose the Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation, the most common hereditary hypercoagulation disorder in Eurasians, and the most frequently requested genetic test reflect the evolving strategies in protein and DNA diagnosis.

METHODS

Here, molecular methods to diagnose the FVL mutation are discussed.

RESULTS

Protein-based detection assays include the conventional functional activated protein C resistance coagulation test and the recently reported antibody-mediated sensor detection; and DNA-based assays include approaches that use electrophoretic fractionation e.g., restriction fragment length polymorphism, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, and single-stranded conformational PCR analysis, DNA hybridization (e.g., microarrays), DNA polymerase-based assays, e.g., extension reactions, fluorescence polarization template-directed dye-terminator incorporation, PCR assays (e.g., amplification-refractory mutation system, melting curve analysis using real-time quantitative PCR, and helicase-dependent amplification), DNA sequencing (e.g., direct sequencing, pyrosequencing), cleavase-based Invader assay and ligase-based assays (e.g., oligonucleotide ligation assay and ligase-mediated rolling circle amplification).

CONCLUSION

The method chosen by a laboratory to diagnose FVL not only depends on the available technical expertise and equipment, but also the type, variety, and extent of other genetic disorders being diagnosed.

Analytic validity of genetic tests to identify factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A

The objective of this study is to systematically review methods for detecting Factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A. English-language literature from MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycInfo(c), 2000-December 2008. Studies assessed methods for detection of these mutations in at least 10 human blood samples and reported concordance, discordance, or reproducibility. Two investigators abstracted data on the sample selection criteria, test operators, DNA extraction, experimental test, reference standard, commercial instruments, concordance rates, explanation of any discordance, and whether discordance resolved after repetition. We assessed strength of the evidence using the GRADE criteria. We reviewed 7,777 titles and included 66 articles. The majority of the reviewed studies used PCR-RFLP or AS-PCR as the reference standard. The studies demonstrated that commercially available and precommercial tests have high analytic validity with all having greater than 99% concordance with the reference standard. With a few exceptions, discordance resolved with repetition of the test, suggesting operator or administrative errors were responsible for the discordant results. In the quality assurance studies, greater than 98% of laboratories demonstrated high, even perfect, accuracy when asked to diagnose a sample with a known mutation. The majority of errors came from a limited number of laboratories. Although not all methods may be accurate, there is high-grade evidence that genetic tests for the detection of FVL and prothrombin G20210A have excellent analytic validity. There is high-grade evidence that most, but not all, clinical laboratories test for FVL and prothrombin G20210A accurately.

Understanding the nutrigenomic definitions and concepts at the food-genome junction

The marked differences in individual response to dietary factors have led to major controversies in nutrition and puzzled nutrition scientists over the last century. The emerging field of nutrigenomics helps us to understand the basis for some of these differences and also promises us the ability to tailor diet based on individual genetic makeup. Great advances in Human Genome Project, documentation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes and their association with metabolic imbalances have gradually added new tests to the nutrigenomic panel. Studies based on ethnopharmacology and phytotherapy concepts showed that nutrients and botanicals can interact with the genome causing marked changes in gene expression. This has led to the commercial development of nutraceuticals and functional foods that can modify negative health effects of individual genetic profile bringing the field to the "food/genome" junction. Despite the promise of nutrigenomics to personalize diet, there is skepticism whether it can truly bring about meaningful modification of the risk factors connected to chronic diseases, due to the lack of large scale nutrition intervention studies. Several intervention studies currently underway in the United States and abroad (Israel, Spain, and France) will further help validate nutrigenomic concepts. France has already introduced a National Nutrition and Health Program to assess nutritional status and risk of major metabolic diseases. As the field(s) related to nutritional genomics advance in their scope, it is essential that: (a) strict guidelines be followed in the nomenclature and definition of the subdisciplines; and (b) the state/federal regulatory guidelines be updated for diagnostic laboratories, especially for those offering tests directly to the public (without a physician's request) to help protect the consumer.

A novel procedure for genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms in trisomy with genomic DNA and the invader assay

Individuals with trisomy 21 display complex phenotypes with differing degrees of severity. Numerous reliable methods have been established to diagnose the initial trisomy in these patients, but the identification and characterization of the genetic basis of the phenotypic variation in individuals with trisomy remains challenging. To date, methods that can accurately determine genotypes in trisomic DNA samples are expensive, require specialized equipment and complicated analyses. Here we report proof-of-concept results for an Invader® assay-based genotyping procedure that can determine SNP genotypes in trisomic genomic DNA samples in a simple and cost-effective manner. The procedure requires only two experimental steps: a real-time measurement of the fluorescent Invader® signal and analysis with a specifically designed clustering algorithm. The approach was tested using genomic DNA samples from 23 individuals with trisomy 21, and results were compared to genotypes previously determined with pyrosequencing. Additional assays for 15 SNPs were tested in a set of 21 DNA samples to assess assay performance. Our method successfully identified the correct SNP genotypes for the trisomic genomic DNA samples tested, and thus provides an alternative to determine SNP genotypes in trisomic DNA samples for subsequent association studies in patients with Down syndrome and other trisomies.

Selection of a platform for mutation detection

New mutation detection technologies must keep pace by becoming more cost-effective while offering improved technical sensitivity and higher throughput capacity. In recent years, the number of mutation detection platforms available to the clinical researcher has grown to a point where it is difficult to keep track of all available options as well as their benefits and pitfalls. This unit provides an entry point for a variety of researchers who wish to analyze samples for known or novel mutations and need to determine which platform is most suited for their particular needs. A practical guide is provided in this unit, including a brief overview, information on assay parameters, design and cost considerations, as well as platform flexibility and scalability of the assay. Although the focus here is on applications involving human disease, many of these platforms can be easily adapted to the study of other organisms.

An overview of methods for detection of factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutations

Venous thromboembolism, represented by deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a common disease with high mortality and morbidity. Within the last 25 years, risk factors for venous thromboembolism have been linked to mutations in the genes of the coagulation/anticoagulation system. Factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutations are the most prevalent inherited risk factors predisposing to venous thromboembolism in the Western world. Tests to detect these mutations are carried out when investigating a personal or family history of venous thromboembolism. At the present, there are several different methods available for the detection of these mutations in the laboratory. The choice of the method will depend on many variables. This article is aimed at reviewing the available methods for the detection of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations, their principle, applicability, advantages and disadvantages of use.

The N-terminal region is important for the nuclease activity and thermostability of the flap endonuclease-1 from Sulfolobus tokodaii

This paper reports the biochemical properties of two types of recombinant flap endonuclease-1 (FEN-1) proteins obtained from the thermophilic crenarchaeon, Sulfolobus tokodaii strain 7. One of the two FEN-1 proteins is a product of the gene with AUG as the translational start codon (StoS-FEN-1), which is originally assigned in the database. The other is a product of the gene with a new AUG start codon (StoL-FEN-1), which is inserted at 153 bases upstream of the original AUG codon. Although StoL-FEN-1 showed activity and thermostability, StoS-FEN-1 showed neither activity nor thermostability. The N-terminal region in StoL-FEN-1 was also conserved in all of the FEN-1 homologs deduced from genes from newly isolated Sulfolobus spp. These results strongly suggest that the actual start codon of the fen-1 gene from S. tokodaii is not the originally assigned AUG, but rather is located at about 100 bases upstream of this codon.

Quality Assurance Issues and Interpretation of Assays

The consequences of an erroneous thrombophilia diagnosis may be serious if it is used to determine clinical management. Therefore careful selection, assessment, and control of laboratory tests for thrombophilia are essential. As for other coagulation tests, the pre-analytical phase must be carefully controlled with attention to the specific problems associated with each type of assay. The investigator must then recognize that for most laboratory tests of thrombophilia, there are a number of assay types available, often based on different principles of analysis. This creates the potential for different users to obtain varying results depending on the technique employed. Such problems can occur in assays of antithrombin activity, depending on whether the assay employs factor Xa, human thrombin, or bovine thrombin. In clot-based assays of protein C and protein S, there can be specificity problems related to interference by factor V Leiden (FVL), antiphospholipid antibodies, and other substances. Even genetic tests can give erroneous results and should not automatically be seen as absolute without supporting evidence and careful quality-control measures. Whatever technique is selected, it is mandatory to incorporate sufficient concurrent quality-control samples to validate the results of thrombophilia tests. These should include assessment of the parameter at normal and abnormal levels to give confidence in results across the measurement range that would normally be encountered in routine practice. This should be used in conjunction with regular participation in external quality assessment (EQA) (which has been linked to improved laboratory performance in thrombophilia testing). Larger EQA programs can provide information concerning the relative performance of analytical procedures, including the method principle, reagents, and instruments. Herein, we describe many of the methodologic effects in detail. We use specific examples to illustrate the general principle that, in performing laboratory testing for thrombophilia, one must always consider the performance characteristics and limitations of the assay in use.

Screening for adverse reactions to irinotecan treatment using the Invader UGT1A1 Molecular Assay

Accumulating evidence provides support for the idea that determination of UGT1A1 polymorphisms before irinotecan (CPT-11) treatment is clinically useful and important for predicting and avoiding related toxicities. In 2005, the irinotecan label was updated in the USA in order to provide pharmacogenetic information. A dose reduction of irinotecan should be considered for patients known to be homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele when administered in combination with other agents or as a single agent. The feasibility of genotyping for DNA polymorphisms prior to treatment depends on the availability of rapid, accurate and efficient genotyping methods. Genotyping of UGT1A1*28, *6 and *27 by the newly developed Invader UGT1A1 Molecular Assay agreed completely with the genotyping results obtained with established methods, and this molecular assay provides rapid detection of polymorphisms. This newly developed method for detecting UGT1A1 polymorphisms is feasible and has the potential to be widely used for rapid and accurate screening before irinotecan treatment.

Molecular Genetic Testing of Polymorphisms Associated With Venous Thrombosis

The growing knowledge of genetic polymorphisms predisposing to venous thrombosis has increased the demand for genetic testing of associated risk factors. This has prompted the need for simple, fast, reliable, and cost-effective genotyping methods for identification of those mutations. In the past decade, a large variety of DNA mutation analysis methods have been developed for detection of genetic variants associated with venous thrombosis, including PCR-based and PCR-independent technologies. Each of these technologies possesses unique advantages, but all have a common goal of simplifying and expediting mutation analysis. This review describes some of the commonly used technologies and commercially available platforms employed in clinical laboratories for genetic testing of thrombophilia. The choice of a technology for each individual laboratory would primarily depend on the specific requirements for the assay's accuracy, reliability, speed, throughput, and cost-effectiveness.

Detection of 677CT/1298AC "double variant" chromosomes: implications for interpretation of MTHFR genotyping results

PURPOSE

Genotyping 37,026 individuals as part of a thrombophilia evaluation, we determined and analyzed the genotypic frequencies of the 677CT and 1298AC mutations in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene.

METHODS

The 677CT and 1298AC mutations in the MTHFR gene were determined by either a laboratory-developed test involving PCR amplification and restriction digestion utilizing the ABI 3100 capillary electrophoresis apparatus (Applied Biosystems Inc) or by using an Analyte Specific Reagent (ASR) supplied by Third Wave Technologies. The genotype for three specimens with triple variant MTHFR mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing on the ABI 3100 capillary electrophoresis apparatus.

RESULTS

The MTHFR frequencies of the 677CT/1298AA, 677CC/1298AC, 677CT/1298AC, 677CC/1298AA, 677TT/1298AA, 677CC/1298CC, 677TT/1298AC, and 677CT/1298CC genotypes were 0.228, 0.208, 0.198, 0.153, 0.122, 0.088, 0.0005, and 0.0003, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals containing double variant MTHFR mutations on one allele (cis) cannot be distinguished between compound heterozygotes (trans) for 677CT and 1298AC mutations in routine clinical testing, a genotype associated with thrombophilia. Such patients could be inappropriately counseled for being at high risk for thrombotic episodes. Until information regarding prevalence and the clinical consequences of this double variant (cis) allele becomes available, caution should be used in interpreting the genotyping results of compound heterozygosity for 677CT and 1298AC.