Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease

Serological markers and inflammatory bowel disease: Prevalence of serum markers and their diagnostic value in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic nonspecific disease of the digestive tract that is caused by genetic and environmental factors, including ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and unclassified IBD. At present, the diagnosis of IBD depends mainly on clinical manifestations, imaging changes, colonoscopy, and pathological biopsy, but there exist some limitations. The advantages of serological markers in IBD diagnosis are prominent, and a large number of relevant studies have been reported. This paper reviews the diagnostic and therapeutic value of serological markers in IBD, with an aim to clarify their role in the diagnosis and treatment of IBD.

Utility of fecal and serum anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease-like condition of the pouch

BACKGROUND

Fecal antibodies against bacterial products may directly reflect the interaction between luminal bacteria and mucosal immunity, and assays for these antibodies may be clinically useful in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Crohn's disease-like (CDL) condition of the pouch.

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate stool and serum anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) in normal and diseased pouches, to assess the correlation between ASCA levels and endoscopic disease activity, and to ascertain the diagnostic utility of ASCA for CDL of the pouch.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-nine patients with ileal pouches were prospectively enrolled and corresponding serum and pouch aspirate samples were collected. Fecal and serum ASCA levels were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in a blinded fashion. Statistical analysis was then conducted using the signed rank test, Spearman correlation coefficients, and analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (22.8 %) had irritable pouch syndrome or normal pouches, 74 (39.2 %) had pouchitis/cuffitis, 52 (27.5 %) had CDL, 9 (4.8 %) had familial adenomatous polyposis, and 11 (5.8 %) had surgical complications of the pouch. Receiver operating characteristic curves to distinguish CDL from other categories of pouch dysfunction had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.608 for fecal ASCA and an AUC of 0.517 for serum ASCA. Neither fecal nor serum ASCA correlated with endoscopic disease activity scores. There was a significant difference in the mean values of fecal ASCA between inflammatory and fistulizing CDL (0.27 vs. 0.03 ELISA units/ml, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal ASCA appears to be better than serum ASCA in differentiating CDL from other pouch disorders, although this distinction may be of limited clinical utility.

Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies associate with phenotypes and higher risk for surgery in Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggested that anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA) status was associated with diagnostic findings, stratified classification phenotypes, disease activity and clinical course of Crohn's disease (CD). However, the relationship between ASCA status and phenotypes of CD remains controversial in these studies.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ASCA status is associated with the phenotypes and the risk of surgery in diverse populations in CD.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of studies assessing the association of ASCA status with phenotypes and risk of surgery in CD. Three independent reviewers undertook data extraction. We pooled odds ratios separately for the cohort and case-control studies.

RESULTS

We identified ten cohort studies (n = 2,365) and 14 case-control studies (n = 1,887) that investigated the association of ASCA status with phenotypes and risk of surgery in CD. The meta-analysis of the cohort studies showed significant association between the ASCA-positive status and higher risk of early-onset age (OR 2.25, 95 % CI 1.41-3.57, P < 0.001), ileal involvement disease (1.70, 1.05-2.77, P = 0.03), complicated disease behavior (2.09, 1.71-2.57, P < 0.001), perianal disease (1.49, 1.14-1.94, P = 0.004), and risk for surgery (1.61, 1.29-2.01, P < 0.001). Meta-analysis of the case-control studies also showed a significantly higher risk in ileal involvement disease (1.77, 1.25-2.49, P = 0.001), complicated disease behavior (2.13, 1.70-2.68, P < 0.001), perianal disease (1.96, 1.38-2.78, P < 0.001), and risk for surgery (1.71, 1.17-2.49, P = 0.005), except for the early-onset age (1.16, 0.80-1.69, P = 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated that positive ASCA status is a risk factor for early-onset age, ileal involvement, complicated behavior, perianal disease and requirement for surgery in CD.

The role of autoantibodies in inflammatory bowel disease

The search for the underlying trigger of an inappropriate inflammatory reaction characteristic of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has led to the discovery of several antibodies. The panel of serologic markers for IBD is rapidly expanding. Serologic markers hold the promise of helping researchers and clinicians to better understand IBD heterogeneity and natural history. The real importance of the antibodies produced against various microbial and autoantigens is still uncertain. Whether these antibodies play a primary role in the pathogenesis of IBD, or their presence is only a consequence of the inflamed mucosa is a fundamental question that remains to be clarified. The impact of the routine evaluation of these serologic markers in the everyday clinical IBD diagnostic algorithm is questionable due to their limited sensitivity. Despite their great potential, the routine use of serologic markers for diagnosis and follow-up is currently not justified. However, their correlation with disease phenotype and behavior is more established. A combination of serum markers has been shown to be of more value compared to using single markers alone. The ongoing challenge is how to best utilize these serologic markers to provide clinically relevant information in a cost-effective manner. Further prospective clinical trials are needed to determine their exact role in pathogenesis and practical clinical importance. We review the current standpoint of the clinical impact of various established and newly suggested markers in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Laboratory tests for patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: clinical utility in predicting, diagnosing, and monitoring pouch disorders

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) or UC-associated dysplasia, and for the majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Pouchitis and other complications of IPAA are common. There are scant data on laboratory markers for the evaluation and diagnosis of pouch disorders. The presence of immunogenotypic markers such as genetic polymorphisms of interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist, NOD2/CARD15, Toll-like receptor, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha has been reported to be associated with pouchitis. Immunophenotypic/serologic markers such as perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody and anti-CBir1 have been investigated as possible markers for predicting and diagnosing pouchitis. Fecal markers including lactoferrin and calprotectin seem to be useful in distinguishing inflammatory from noninflammatory pouch disorders. In our practice, we have encountered a large number of pouch patients with Clostridium difficile infection. Laboratory evaluation provides information on the etiology and pathogenesis of pouchitis, and it also helps practicing clinicians with accurate diagnosis, differential diagnosis, disease stratification, and management of ileal pouch disorders.

[Relevance of serologic studies in inflammatory bowel diseases]

The panel of serologic markers for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) is rapidly expanding. Although anti- Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) and atypical perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (atypical P-ANCA) remain the most widely investigated, an increasing amount of experimental data is available on newly discovered antibodies directed against various microbial antigens. Such antibodies include anti-OmpC (outer membrane porin C), anti- Pseudomonas fluorescens (anti-I2) and antiglycan antibodies (anti-laminaribioside carbohydrate antibody [ALCA]), anti-chitobioside carbohydrate antibody [ACCA]), anti-mannobioside carbohydrate antibody [AMCA]) and anti-CBir1; this latter is the first bacterial antigen to induce colitis in animal models of IBD and also leads to a pathological immune response in IBD patients (anti-flagellin antibody). The role of assessment of various antibodies in the current diagnostic algorithm of IBD is rather questionable due to their limited sensitivity. In contrast, the association of serologic markers with disease behavior and phenotype is getting more into the focus of interest. An increasing number of observations confirm that patients with Crohn's disease expressing multiple serologic markers at high titers are more likely to have complicated small bowel disease (e.g. stricture and/or perforation) and are at higher risk for surgery than those without, or with low titer of antibodies. Creating homogenous disease sub-groups based on serologic response may help develop more standardized therapeutic approaches and may help in a better understanding of the pathomechanism of IBD. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to establish the clinical role of serologic tests in IBD.

Clinical significance of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA) in Korean patients with Crohn's disease and its relationship to the disease clinical course

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

The implications of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody for the diagnosis and the clinical course of Crohn's disease have been reported in Western countries, but rarely in Korea with its very different environmental and genetic backgrounds. We aimed to evaluate whether anti-S. cerevisiae antibody expression is associated with diagnostic findings, stratified Vienna classification phenotypes, disease activity and clinical course in Korean patients with Crohn's disease.

MATERIALS/METHODS

One hundred and fifteen patients with Crohn's disease, diagnosed and treated between 1990 and 2004 at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University and followed for at least 2 years, were included in this study. Anti-S. cerevisiae antibody was detected by an indirect immunofluorescence assay using EUROIMMUN kits. Information collected during treatment included demography, Vienna classification phenotype, clinical manifestation, laboratory tests, treatment modality and surgery rate. Disease activity was measured monthly using the Harvey-Bradshaw index.

RESULTS

The anti-S. cerevisiae antibody prevalence was 38.3% in Crohn's disease patients. There was no difference in anti-S. cerevisiae antibody expression between genders. The mean age at diagnosis was younger for the anti-S. cerevisiae antibody positive group than the negative group (25.3 years versus 29.7 years, p<0.05). Clinical manifestations and laboratory tests at diagnosis did not differ between the groups. The anti-S. cerevisiae antibody positive group had increased fibrostenosis (B2) and penetration (B3) compared to negative group, as determined by the Vienna classification (75.0% versus 53.5%, p<0.05). Anti-S. cerevisiae antibody positive patients were admitted to the hospital more frequently than anti-S. cerevisiae antibody negative patients (p<0.05). The yearly cumulative Harvey-Bradshaw index score was higher in the anti-S. cerevisiae antibody positive group than in the negative group during the follow-up period (p<0.05). In addition, steroid (72.7% versus 52.1%, p<0.05) and immunosuppressive (45.5% versus 23.9%, p<0.05) treatments were more frequently given to the anti-S. cerevisiae antibody positive group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that anti-S. cerevisiae antibody positive Crohn's disease patients had a more severe clinical course and thus often required more aggressive medical treatment.

Utility of serological markers in inflammatory bowel diseases: Gadget or magic?

The panel of serologic markers for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is rapidly expanding. Although anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) and atypical perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (P-ANCA) remain the most widely investigated, an increasing amount of experimental data is available on newly discovered antibodies directed against various microbial antigens. The role of the assessment of various antibodies in the current IBD diagnostic algorithm is often questionable due to their limited sensitivity. In contrast, the association of serologic markers with disease behavior and phenotype is becoming increasingly well-established. An increasing number of observations confirms that patients with Crohn’s disease expressing multiple serologic markers at high titers are more likely to have complicated small bowel disease (e.g. stricture and/or perforation) and are at higher risk for surgery than those without, or with low titers of antibodies. Creating homogenous disease sub-groups based on serologic response may help develop more standardized therapeutic approaches and may help in a better understanding of the pathomechanism of IBD. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to establish the clinical role of serologic tests in IBD.

Autoantibodies in the diagnosis and management of liver disease

Autoantibodies are nonpathogenic manifestations of immune reactivity, and they may occur in acute and chronic liver diseases. Autoantibodies may be consequences rather than causes of the liver injury, and they should be regarded as diagnostic clues rather than etiologic markers. Conventional autoantibodies used in the categorization of autoimmune liver disease are antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and atypical perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Ancillary autoantibodies that enhance diagnostic specificity, have prognostic connotation, or direct treatment are antibodies to endomysium, tissue transglutaminase, histones, doubled-stranded DNA, and actin. Autoantibodies that have an emerging diagnostic and prognostic significance are antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, liver cytosol type 1, and nuclear pore complex antigens. Autoantibodies of uncertain clinical value that remain under investigation are antibodies to chromatin, lactoferrin, and Saccharomyces cervisiae. Continued recognition and characterization of autoantibodies should improve diagnostic precision, provide prognostic indices, and elucidate target autoantigens. These advances may in turn clarify pathogenic mechanisms, facilitate the development of animal models, and generate novel site-specific therapies.

Serological markers in inflammatory bowel diseases

This chapter is an overview of the literature on serological markers of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), focusing on anti-neutrophil cytoplasm autoantibodies (ANCA) and anti- Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan antibodies (ASCA). The methodology for ANCA and ASCA testing is first introduced. The value of these markers as diagnostic tools is then discussed. Other chapters are devoted to the potential role of ANCA and ASCA in disease monitoring, disease stratification and as subclinical markers in families. Finally reviewed are other antibodies recently tested in clinical trials such as pancreatic antibodies and antibodies directed against bacterial antigens. The role of these antibodies in the pathophysiology of IBD still needs to be assessed. We also need to identify the ASCA immunogen(s) eliciting the antibody response.