1
|
Albakri A, Pisuchpen P, Capasso JE, Schneider A, Kopinsky S, Glaser T, Chiang JPW, Yomai AA, McNear D, Levin AV. Novel CRB1 pathogenic variant in Chuuk families with Leber congenital amaurosis. Am J Med Genet A 2023; 191:1007-1012. [PMID: 36595661 PMCID: PMC10262898 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to determine the cause of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) in Chuuk state, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM). In this prospective observational case series, five patients with early-onset vision loss were examined in Chuuk state, FSM, during an ocular genetics visit to study the elevated incidence of microphthalmia. Because of their low vision these patients were incorrectly assumed to have microphthalmia. A complete ophthalmological exam established a clinical diagnosis of LCA. Candidate gene exons were sequenced with a targeted retinal dystrophy panel. Five subjects in three related families were diagnosed with LCA. All five were from Tonoas Island, within the Chuuk Lagoon, with ages ranging from 6 months to 16 years. DNA sequencing of affected individuals revealed a homozygous CRB1 NM_201253.3:c.3134del pathogenic variant, which was heterozygous in their parents. CRB1 genotypes were confirmed by a PCR restriction assay. We report identification of a founder pathogenic variant in CRB1 responsible for autosomal recessive LCA in this isolated community. This discovery will lead to appropriate recurrence risk counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amani Albakri
- Pediatric and Ocular Genetics, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Phattrawan Pisuchpen
- Pediatric and Ocular Genetics, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, the Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jenina E. Capasso
- Pediatric and Ocular Genetics, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adele Schneider
- Pediatric and Ocular Genetics, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Division of Genetics, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarina Kopinsky
- Division of Genetics, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tom Glaser
- Department of Cell Biology & Human Anatomy, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | | | | | - Donna McNear
- Independent Educational Consultant, Cambridge, Minnesota, USA
| | - Alex V. Levin
- Pediatric and Ocular Genetics, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Charlton-Perkins M, Cook TA. Building a fly eye: terminal differentiation events of the retina, corneal lens, and pigmented epithelia. Curr Top Dev Biol 2010; 93:129-73. [PMID: 20959165 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-385044-7.00005-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
In the past, vast differences in ocular structure, development, and physiology throughout the animal kingdom led to the widely accepted notion that eyes are polyphyletic, that is, they have independently arisen multiple times during evolution. Despite the dissimilarity between vertebrate and invertebrate eyes, it is becoming increasingly evident that the development of the eye in both groups shares more similarity at the genetic level than was previously assumed, forcing a reexamination of eye evolution. Understanding the molecular underpinnings of cell type specification during Drosophila eye development has been a focus of research for many labs over the past 25 years, and many of these findings are nicely reviewed in Chapters 1 and 4. A somewhat less explored area of research, however, considers how these cells, once specified, develop into functional ocular structures. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge related to the terminal differentiation events of the retina, corneal lens, and pigmented epithelia in the fly eye. In addition, we discuss emerging evidence that the different functional components of the fly eye share developmental pathways and functions with the vertebrate eye.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Charlton-Perkins
- Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crosstalk between small GTPases and polarity proteins in cell polarization. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9:846-59. [PMID: 18946474 DOI: 10.1038/nrm2521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 335] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Cell polarization is crucial for the development of multicellular organisms, and aberrant cell polarization contributes to various diseases, including cancer. How cell polarity is established and how it is maintained remain fascinating questions. Conserved proteins of the partitioning defective (PAR), Scribble and Crumbs complexes guide the establishment of cell polarity in various organisms. Moreover, GTPases that regulate actin cytoskeletal dynamics have been implicated in cell polarization. Recent findings provide insights into polarization mechanisms and show intriguing crosstalk between small GTPases and members of polarity complexes in regulating cell polarization in different cellular contexts and cell types.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cui S, Otten C, Rohr S, Abdelilah-Seyfried S, Link BA. Analysis of aPKClambda and aPKCzeta reveals multiple and redundant functions during vertebrate retinogenesis. Mol Cell Neurosci 2007; 34:431-44. [PMID: 17223574 PMCID: PMC2700298 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2006.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2006] [Revised: 11/09/2006] [Accepted: 11/20/2006] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Retinal lamination is known to depend on cell polarity and localized signaling. In vertebrates, atypical protein kinase C proteins, aPKClambda/iota and aPKCzeta, are essential for apical-basal cell polarity. However, it is not known to what extent functional redundancy has precluded a comprehensive functional characterization of aPKC signaling during vertebrate retinogenesis. Here, we show that aPKCs lambda and zeta are functionally redundant for multiple aspects of retinogenesis including mitotic division location and orientation, cell-type positioning, and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) and photoreceptor cell morphogenesis. Genetic mosaic analyses demonstrate a cell-autonomous requirement of aPKCs for RPE and photoreceptor development, and a cell-non-cell-autonomous function that is intrinsic to the neural retina for cell-type positioning. Our observations uncover a previously unappreciated involvement of aPKCzeta during zebrafish retinogenesis and suggest that aPKC signaling primes the retinal environment for appropriate cell migration of post-mitotic progenitor cells but is not essential for correct cell-type specification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Cui
- Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI 53226, United States
| | - Cécile Otten
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Rohr
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Brian A. Link
- Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI 53226, United States
- Author for correspondence: Brian A. Link, Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI 53226, Tel: 414-456-8072, Fax: 414-456-6517,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
D'Costa A, Reifegerste R, Sierra S, Moses K. The Drosophila ramshackle gene encodes a chromatin-associated protein required for cell morphology in the developing eye. Mech Dev 2006; 123:591-604. [PMID: 16904300 DOI: 10.1016/j.mod.2006.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2005] [Revised: 06/26/2006] [Accepted: 06/28/2006] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
We have identified ramshackle (ram) as a dominant suppressor of hedgehog loss-of-function in the developing Drosophila eye. We have characterized the gene and it encodes a double bromodomain protein with eight WD40 repeats. The Ram protein is localized predominantly to polytene chromosome interbands and is required for the transcription of some genes. ram is an essential gene and null mutants die during larval life. In the developing retina, ram mutant cells have morphological defects including disrupted apical junctions, disorganized actin cytoskeletons and mislocalized nuclei, which are followed by delays in cell-cycle transitions and the expression of differentiation markers. ram is a conserved gene: its vertebrate homolog (WDR9), which lies in Down's Syndrome Critical region 2 (DCR2) is also known to be associated with Brahma-Related-Gene 1 (BRG1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison D'Costa
- Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322-3030, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kantardzhieva A, Alexeeva S, Versteeg I, Wijnholds J. MPP3 is recruited to the MPP5 protein scaffold at the retinal outer limiting membrane. FEBS J 2006; 273:1152-65. [PMID: 16519681 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05140.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Mutations in the human Crumbs homologue 1 (CRB1) gene are a frequent cause of various forms of retinitis pigmentosa. The CRB1-membrane-associated palmitoylated protein (MPP)5 protein complex is thought to organize an intracellular protein scaffold in the retina that is involved in maintenance of photoreceptor-Müller glia cell adhesion. This study focused on the binding characteristics and subcellular localization of MPP3, a novel member of the MPP5 protein scaffold at the outer limiting membrane (OLM), and of the DLG1 protein scaffold at the outer plexiform layer of the retina. MPP3 localized at the photoreceptor synapse and at the subapical region adjacent to adherens junctions at the OLM. Localization studies in human retinae revealed that MPP3 colocalized with MPP5 and CRB1 at the subapical region. MPP3 and MPP4 colocalized with DLG1 at the outer plexiform layer. Mouse Dlg1 formed separate complexes with Mpp3 and Mpp4 in vivo. These data implicate a role for MPP3 in photoreceptor polarity and, by association with MPP5, pinpoint MPP3 as a functional candidate gene for inherited retinopathies. The separate Mpp3/Dlg1 and Mpp4/Dlg1 complexes at the outer plexiform layer point towards additional yet unrecognized functions of these membrane associated guanylate kinase proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albena Kantardzhieva
- Department of Neuromedical Genetics, The Netherlands Institute for Neurosciences (NIN), KNAW, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kretzschmar D. Neurodegenerative mutants in Drosophila: a means to identify genes and mechanisms involved in human diseases? INVERTEBRATE NEUROSCIENCE 2005; 5:97-109. [PMID: 16187075 DOI: 10.1007/s10158-005-0005-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2005] [Accepted: 07/20/2005] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
There are 50 ways to leave your lover (Simon 1987) but many more to kill your brain cells. Several neurodegenerative diseases in humans, like Alzheimer's disease, have been intensely studied but the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms are still unknown for most of them. For those syndromes where associated gene products have been identified their biochemistry and physiological as well as pathogenic function is often still under debate. This is in part due to the inherent limitations of genetic analyses in humans and other mammals and therefore experimentally accessible invertebrate in vivo models, such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, have recently been introduced to investigate neurodegenerative syndromes. Several laboratories have used transgenic approaches in Drosophila to study the human genes associated with neurodegenerative diseases. This has added substantially to our understanding of the mechanisms leading to neurodegenerative diseases in humans. The isolation and characterization of Drosophila mutants, which display a variety of neurodegenerative phenotypes, also provide valuable insights into genes, pathways, and mechanisms causing neurodegeneration. So far only about two dozen such mutants have been described but already their characterization reveals an involvement of various cellular functions in neurodegeneration, ranging from preventing oxidative stress to RNA editing. Some of the isolated genes can already be associated with human neurodegenerative diseases and hopefully the isolation and characterization of more of these mutants, together with an analysis of homologous genes in vertebrate models, will provide insights into the genetic and molecular basis of human neurodegenerative diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris Kretzschmar
- Center for Research on Occupational and Environmental Toxicology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mollereau B, Domingos PM. Photoreceptor differentiation in Drosophila: from immature neurons to functional photoreceptors. Dev Dyn 2005; 232:585-92. [PMID: 15704118 DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.20271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
How a pool of equipotent cells acquires a multitude of distinct fates is a major question in developmental biology. The study of photoreceptor (PR) cell differentiation in Drosophila has been used to address this question. PR differentiation is a process that extends over a period of 5 days: It begins in the larval eye imaginal disc when PRs are recruited and commit to particular PR fates, and it culminates in the pupal eye disc with the morphogenesis of the rhabdomeres and the initiation of rhodopsin expression. Several models for PR specification agree that the Ras and Notch signaling pathways are important for the specification of different PR subtypes (Freeman [1997] Development 124:261-270; Cooper and Bray [2000] Curr. Biol. 10:1507-1510; Tomlinson and Struhl [2001] Mol. Cell. 7:487-495). In the first part of this review, we briefly describe the different signaling pathways and transcription factors required for the specification and differentiation of the different PR subtypes in the larval eye disc. In the second part, we review the roles of several transcription factors, which are required for the terminal photoreceptor differentiation and rhodopsin expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Mollereau
- Strang Laboratory of Cancer Research, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mostov K, Su T, ter Beest M. Polarized epithelial membrane traffic: conservation and plasticity. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:287-93. [PMID: 12669082 DOI: 10.1038/ncb0403-287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 233] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Most cells are polarized and have distinct plasma membrane domains, which are the result of polarized trafficking of proteins and lipids. Great progress has been made in elucidating the highly conserved polarized targeting machinery. A pre-eminent challenge now is to understand the plasticity of polarized traffic, how it is altered by differentiation and dedifferentiation during development, as well as the adaptation of differentiated cells to meet changing physiological needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Mostov
- Department of Anatomy, Genentech Hall, 600 16th Street, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-2140, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|