Pitavastatin – pharmacological profile from early phase studies

NIR-Guided Coating Optimization of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Mini Soft Capsules with Pitavastatin and Ezetimibe

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to optimize the coating process of Omega-3 fatty acid (OM3-FA) mini soft capsules containing the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) pitavastatin and ezetimibe using near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy for in-process monitoring. Cardiovascular disease treatments benefit from combining OM3-FA with lipid-lowering agents, but formulating such combinations in mini soft capsules presents challenges in maintaining stability and mechanical integrity.

METHODS

The coating process was developed using a pan coater and real-time NIR monitoring to ensure uniformity and quality. NIR spectroscopy enabled precise control of coating thickness, ensuring consistent drug distribution across the capsule surface.

RESULTS

The optimized process minimized OM3-FA oxidation and preserved the mechanical integrity of the capsules, as confirmed by texture analysis and in-vitro dissolution testing. This integration of NIR spectroscopy as a process analytical technology (PAT) significantly improved coating quality control, resulting in a stable and effective combination therapy for pitavastatin and ezetimibe in a mini soft capsule form.

CONCLUSION

This approach offers an efficient solution for enhancing patient adherence in cardiovascular disease management. The application of NIR spectroscopy for real-time monitoring highlights its broader significance in pharmaceutical manufacturing, where it can serve as a versatile tool for ensuring product quality and optimizing production efficiency in diverse formulation processes. By incorporating NIR-based PAT, manufacturers can not only achieve product-specific improvements but also establish a foundation for continuous manufacturing and automated quality assurance systems, ultimately contributing to a more streamlined and robust production environment.

Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke among Patients Treated with High-Intensity Statins versus Pitavastatin-Ezetimibe: A Population Based Study

High-intensity statin (HIS) is recommended for high-risk patients in current guidelines. However, the risk of hemorrhagic stroke (HS) with HIS is a concern for Asians. Pitavastatin carries pharmacological differences compared with other statins. We compared the risk of HS in patients treated with pitavastatin-ezetimibe vs. HIS. We conducted a population-based, propensity score-matched cohort study using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. From January 2013 to December 2018, adults (≥ 18 years) who received pitavastatin 2-4 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day (combination group, N = 3,767) and those who received atorvastatin 40 mg/day or rosuvastatin 20 mg/day (HIS group, N = 37,670) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was HS. We also assessed the difference of a composite safety endpoint of hepatitis or myopathy requiring hospitalization and new-onset diabetes mellitus. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between study endpoints and different treatment. After a mean follow-up of 3.05 ± 1.66 years, less HS occurred in combination group (0.74%) than in HIS group (1.35%) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.95]. In subgroup analysis, the lower risk of HS in combination group was consistent among all pre-specified subgroups. There was no significant difference of the composite safety endpoint between the 2 groups (aHR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.02). In conclusion, pitavastatin-ezetimibe combination treatment had less HS compared with high-intensity atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. Pitavastatin-ezetimibe may be a favorable choice for Asians who need strict lipid control but with concern of HS.

Building a Predictive PBPK Model for Human OATP Substrates: a Strategic Framework for Early Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacokinetic Variations Using Pitavastatin as an Example

To select a drug candidate for clinical development, accurately and promptly predicting human pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, assessing drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and anticipating potential PK variations in disease populations are crucial steps in drug discovery. The complexity of predicting human PK significantly increases when hepatic transporters are involved in drug clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vss). A strategic framework is developed here, utilizing pitavastatin as an example. The framework includes the construction of a monkey physiologically-based PK (PBPK) model, model calibration to obtain scaling factors (SF) of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) for various clearance parameters, human model development and validation, and assessment of DDIs and PK variations in disease populations. Through incorporating in vitro human parameters and calibrated SFs from the monkey model of 3.45, 0.14, and 1.17 for CLint,active, CLint,passive, and CLint,bile, respectively, and together with the relative fraction transported by individual transporters obtained from in vitro studies and the optimized Ki values for OATP inhibition, the model reasonably captured observed pitavastatin PK profiles, DDIs and PK variations in human subjects carrying genetic polymorphisms, i.e., AUC within 20%. Lastly, when applying the functional reduction based on measured OATP1B biomarkers, the model adequately predicted PK changes in the hepatic impairment population. The present study presents a strategic framework for early-stage drug development, enabling the prediction of PK profiles and assessment of PK variations in scenarios like DDIs, genetic polymorphism, and hepatic impairment-related disease states, specifically focusing on OATP substrates.

Phenotypic screening platform identifies statins as enhancers of immune cell-induced cancer cell death

BACKGROUND

High-throughput screening (HTS) of small molecule drug libraries has greatly facilitated the discovery of new cancer drugs. However, most phenotypic screening platforms used in the field of oncology are based solely on cancer cell populations and do not allow for the identification of immunomodulatory agents.

METHODS

We developed a phenotypic screening platform based on a miniaturized co-culture system with human colorectal cancer- and immune cells, providing a model that recapitulates part of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) complexity while simultaneously being compatible with a simple image-based readout. Using this platform, we screened 1,280 small molecule drugs, all approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and identified statins as enhancers of immune cell-induced cancer cell death.

RESULTS

The lipophilic statin pitavastatin had the most potent anti-cancer effect. Further analysis demonstrated that pitavastatin treatment induced a pro-inflammatory cytokine profile as well as an overall pro-inflammatory gene expression profile in our tumor-immune model.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides an in vitro phenotypic screening approach for the identification of immunomodulatory agents and thus addresses a critical gap in the field of immuno-oncology. Our pilot screen identified statins, a drug family gaining increasing interest as repurposing candidates for cancer treatment, as enhancers of immune cell-induced cancer cell death. We speculate that the clinical benefits described for cancer patients receiving statins are not simply caused by a direct effect on the cancer cells but rather are dependent on the combined effect exerted on both cancer and immune cells.

Effect of concomitant use of pitavastatin with neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols in breast cancer patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Introduction

Preclinical studies have demonstrated the possible anticancer effects of statins, but the synergistic effect of concomitant statin use with standard chemotherapy protocols in patients with breast cancer has not yet been investigated.

Aim

The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of concomitant pitavastatin use with neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols in patients with breast cancer.

Methods

This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 70 adult female patients with pathologically-proven invasive breast cancer were randomized to receive or not receive pitavastatin (2 mg) oral tablets once daily concomitantly with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols for 6 months. The primary outcomes of this study were changes in tumor size and changes to the Ki67 index. In addition, secondary outcomes were changes in cyclin D1 and cleaved caspase-3 serum levels. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04705909).

Results

Patients in the pitavastatin group showed significantly higher median (IQR) reductions in tumor size [−19.8 (−41.5, 9.5)] compared to those in the control group [−5.0 (−15.5, 0.0), p = 0.0009]. The change in Ki67 from baseline to the end of therapy was similar between the two groups (p = 0.12). By the end of therapy, the cyclin D1 levels in the pitavastatin group were significantly decreased [median (IQR) change of − 10.0 (−20.2, −2.9) from baseline], whereas the control group showed an increase in cyclin D1 levels [14.8 (4.1, 56.4)]. The median (IQR) caspase−3 was elevated in the pitavastatin group 1.6 (0.2, 2.2), and decreased in the control group (−0.2 (−1.1, 0.0), p = 0.0002).

Subgroup analysis of the pitavastatin group revealed that patients with positive human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) had higher median (IQR) reductions in Ki67 [−35.0 (−70.0, −12.5)] than those with negative HER2 [2.5 (−15.0, 10.0), p = 0.04]. All patients who achieved a complete pathological response (n = 9) exhibited an HER2-neu positive receptor at baseline.

Conclusion

Concomitant use of pitavastatin with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols may improve neoadjuvant chemotherapy responses in patients with breast cancer.

Pharmacogenetics of Statin-Induced Myotoxicity

Statins, a class of lipid-lowering medications, have been a keystone treatment in cardiovascular health. However, adverse effects associated with statin use impact patient adherence, leading to statin discontinuation. Statin-induced myotoxicity (SIM) is one of the most common adverse effects, prevalent across all ages, genders, and ethnicities. Although certain demographic cohorts carry a higher risk, the impaired quality of life attributed to SIM is significant. The pathogenesis of SIM remains to be fully elucidated, but it is clear that SIM is multifactorial. These factors include drug-drug interactions, renal or liver dysfunction, and genetics. Genetic-inferred risk for SIM was first reported by a landmark genome-wide association study, which reported a higher risk of SIM with a polymorphism in the SLCO1B1 gene. Since then, research associating genetic factors with SIM has expanded widely and has become one of the foci in the field of pharmacogenomics. This review provides an update on the genetic risk factors associated with SIM.

HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors as Drug Leads against Naegleria fowleri

Primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), caused by the free-living ameba Naegleria fowleri, has a fatality rate of over 97%. Treatment of PAM relies on amphotericin B in combination with other drugs, but few patients have survived with the existing drug treatment regimens. Therefore, development of effective drugs is a critical unmet need to avert deaths from PAM. Since ergosterol is one of the major sterols in the membrane of N. fowleri, disruption of isoprenoid and sterol biosynthesis by small-molecule inhibitors may be an effective intervention strategy against N. fowleri. The genome of N. fowleri contains a gene encoding HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR); the catalytic domains of human and N. fowleri HMGR share <60% sequence identity with only two amino acid substitutions in the active site of the enzyme. Considering the similarity of human and N. fowleri HMGR, we tested well-tolerated and widely used HMGR inhibitors, known as cholesterol-lowering statins, against N. fowleri. We identified blood-brain-barrier-permeable pitavastatin as a potent amebicidal agent against the U.S., Australian, and European strains of N. fowleri. Pitavastatin was equipotent to amphotericin B against the European strain of N. fowleri; it killed about 80% of trophozoites within 16 h of drug exposure. Pretreatment of trophozoites with mevalonate, the product of HMGR, rescued N. fowleri from inhibitory effects of statins, demonstrating that HMGR of N. fowleri is the target of statins. Because of the good safety profile and availability for both adult and pediatric uses, consideration should be given to repurposing the fast-acting pitavastatin for the treatment of PAM.

Pharmacokinetics of current and emerging treatments for hypercholesterolemia

Introduction: Reduction of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins reduces cardiovascular (CV) events and greater reductions have greater benefits. Current lipid treatments cannot always achieve desirable LDL-C targets and additional or alternative treatments are often needed.Areas covered: In this article, we review the pharmacokinetics of the available and emerging treatments for hypercholesterolemia and focus on recently approved drugs and those at a late stage of development.Expert opinion: Statin pharmacokinetics are well known and appropriate drugs and doses can usually be chosen for individual patients to achieve LDL-C targets and avoid adverse effects and drug-drug interactions. Ezetimibe, icosapent ethyl and the monoclonal antibodies evolocumab and alirocumab have established efficacy and safety. Newer oral agents including pemafibrate and bempedoic acid have generally favorable pharmacokinetics supporting use in a wide range of patients. RNA-based therapies with antisense oligonucleotides are highly specific for their targets and those inhibiting apoB, apoCIII, angiopoietin-like protein 3 and lipoprotein(a) have shown promising results. The small-interfering RNA inclisiran has the notable advantage that a single subcutaneous administration may be effective for up to 6 months. The CV outcome trial results and long term safety data are eagerly awaited for these new agents.

Statin-Related Myotoxicity: A Comprehensive Review of Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacogenomic and Muscle Components

Statins are a cornerstone in the pharmacological prevention of cardiovascular disease. Although generally well tolerated, a small subset of patients experience statin-related myotoxicity (SRM). SRM is heterogeneous in presentation; phenotypes include the relatively more common myalgias, infrequent myopathies, and rare rhabdomyolysis. Very rarely, statins induce an anti-HMGCR positive immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy. Diagnosing SRM in clinical practice can be challenging, particularly for mild SRM that is frequently due to alternative aetiologies and the nocebo effect. Nevertheless, SRM can directly harm patients and lead to statin discontinuation/non-adherence, which increases the risk of cardiovascular events. Several factors increase systemic statin exposure and predispose to SRM, including advanced age, concomitant medications, and the nonsynonymous variant, rs4149056, in SLCO1B1, which encodes the hepatic sinusoidal transporter, OATP1B1. Increased exposure of skeletal muscle to statins increases the risk of mitochondrial dysfunction, calcium signalling disruption, reduced prenylation, atrogin-1 mediated atrophy and pro-apoptotic signalling. Rare variants in several metabolic myopathy genes including CACNA1S, CPT2, LPIN1, PYGM and RYR1 increase myopathy/rhabdomyolysis risk following statin exposure. The immune system is implicated in both conventional statin intolerance/myotoxicity via LILRB5 rs12975366, and a strong association exists between HLA-DRB1*11:01 and anti-HMGCR positive myopathy. Epigenetic factors (miR-499-5p, miR-145) have also been implicated in statin myotoxicity. SRM remains a challenge to the safe and effective use of statins, although consensus strategies to manage SRM have been proposed. Further research is required, including stringent phenotyping of mild SRM through N-of-1 trials coupled to systems pharmacology omics- approaches to identify novel risk factors and provide mechanistic insight.

The poor design of clinical trials of statins in oncology may explain their failure - Lessons for drug repurposing

Statins are widely used to treat hypercholesterolaemia. However, by inhibiting the production of mevalonate, they also reduce the production of several isoprenoids that are necessary for the function of small GTPase oncogenes such as Ras. As such, statins offer an attractive way to inhibit an "undruggable" target, suggesting that they may be usefully repurposed to treat cancer. However, despite numerous studies, there is still no consensus whether statins are useful in the oncology arena. Numerous preclinical studies have provided evidence justifying the evaluation of statins in cancer patients. Some retrospective studies of patients taking statins to control cholesterol have identified a reduced risk of cancer mortality. However, prospective clinical studies have mostly not been successful. We believe that this has occurred because many of the prospective clinical trials have been poorly designed. Many of these trials have failed to take into account some or all of the factors identified in preclinical studies that are likely to be necessary for statins to be efficacious. We suggest an improved trial design which takes these factors into account. Importantly, we suggest that the design of clinical trials of drugs which are being considered for repurposing should not assume it is appropriate to use them in the same way as they are used in their original indication. Rather, such trials deserve to be informed by preclinical studies that are comparable to those for any novel drug.

Duality of statin action on lipoprotein subpopulations in the mixed dyslipidemia of metabolic syndrome: Quantity vs quality over time and implication of CETP

BACKGROUND

Statins impact the metabolism, concentrations, composition, and function of circulating lipoproteins.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated time course relationships between statin-mediated reduction in atherogenic apolipoprotein B (ApoB)-containing particles and dynamic intravascular remodeling of ApoAI-containing lipoprotein subpopulations in the mixed dyslipidemia of metabolic syndrome.

METHODS

Insulin-resistant, hypertriglyceridemic, hypercholesterolemic, obese males (n = 12) were treated with pitavastatin (4 mg/d) and response evaluated at 6, 42, and 180 days.

RESULTS

Reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, ApoB, and triglycerides (TGs) was essentially complete at 42 days (-38%, -32%, and -35%, respectively); rapid reduction equally occurred in remnant cholesterol, ApoCII, CIII, and E levels (day 6; -35%, -50%, -23%, and -26%, respectively). Small dense LDLs (LDL4 and LDL5 subpopulations) predominated at baseline and were markedly reduced on treatment (-29% vs total LDL mass). Cholesteryl ester (CE) transfer protein activity and mass decreased progressively (-18% and -16%, respectively); concomitantly, TG depletion (up to -49%) and CE enrichment occurred in all high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particle subpopulations with normalization of CE/TG mass ratio at 180 days. ApoAI was redistributed from LpAI to LpAI:AII particles in HDL2a and HDL3a subpopulations; ApoCIII was preferentially depleted from LpAI:AII-rich particles on treatment.

CONCLUSION

Overall, statin action exhibits duality in mixed dyslipidemia, as CE transfer protein-mediated normalization of the HDL CE/TG core lags markedly behind subacute reduction in elevated levels of atherogenic ApoB-containing lipoproteins. Normalization of the HDL neutral lipid core is consistent with enhanced atheroprotective function. The HDL CE/TG ratio constitutes a metabolomic marker of perturbed HDL metabolism in insulin-resistant states, equally allowing monitoring of statin impact on HDL metabolism, structure, and function.

Pitavastatin nanoparticle-engineered endothelial progenitor cells repair injured vessels

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) participate in vessel recovery and maintenance of normal endothelial function. Therefore, pitavastatin-nanoparticles (NPs)-engineered EPC may be effective in repairing injured vasculature. Pitavastatin-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) NPs were obtained via ultrasonic emulsion solvent evaporation with PLGA as the carrier encapsulating pitavastatin. The effects and mechanism of pitavastatin-NPs on EPC proliferation in vitro were evaluated. Then, EPC that internalized pitavastatin-NPs were transplanted into rats after carotid artery injury. EPC homing, re-endothelialization, and neointima were evaluated by fluorescence labeling, evans Blue and hematoxylin/eosin (H&E) staining. Pitavastatin-NPs significantly improved EPC proliferation compared with control and pitavastatin group. Those effects were blocked by pretreatment with the pharmacological phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) blockers LY294002. After carotid artery injury, more transplanted EPC were detected in target zone in Pitavastatin-NPs group than pitavastatin and control group. Re-endothelialization was promoted and intimal hyperplasia was inhibited as well. Thus, pitavastatin-NPs promote EPC proliferation via PI3K signaling and accelerate recovery of injured carotid artery.

Pitavastatin: A Review in Hypercholesterolemia

Oral pitavastatin (Livalo^®; Livazo^®) is a competitive HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that is available in the EU for the reduction of elevated total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia and combined (mixed) dyslipidemia. In short-term, phase III or IV studies in this patient population, pitavastatin 1-4 mg once daily was generally no less effective than presumed equipotent dosages of atorvastatin and simvastatin (including in patients with type 2 diabetes or ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors) and was superior to pravastatin (including in patients aged ≥65 years) in lowering LDL-C levels. Pitavastatin provided sustained LDL-C-lowering efficacy over up to 60 weeks' therapy in extension studies, and was associated with short- and longer-term improvements in several other lipid parameters. Short- and longer-term outcomes in studies in Asian patients were consistent with these findings. Pitavastatin was generally well tolerated and did not appear to adversely affect glucose metabolism parameters (e.g. fasting blood glucose, fasting plasma glucose, fasting plasma insulin, glycated hemoglobin) in short- and longer-term prospective and post-marketing surveillance studies in adults. Moreover, in combination with lifestyle modification advice, it was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of progression from impaired glucose tolerance to diabetes relative to lifestyle modification advice alone in a longer-term study in Japanese subjects. Thus, pitavastatin is an effective treatment option in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia and combined (mixed) dyslipidemia, including those at risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

Clinical benefits of pitavastatin: focus on patients with diabetes or at risk of developing diabetes

Despite attaining LDL-cholesterol targets, many patients with diabetes remain at risk of developing cardiovascular events. In addition, treatment with statins has been associated with a slight but significant increased risk of development of diabetes, particularly with high-intensity statins. Pitavastatin is a moderate- to high-intensity statin that effectively reduces LDL-cholesterol levels. Pitavastatin provides a sustained increase of HDL-cholesterol levels that may exhibit a neutral or positive effect on glucose metabolism, may not increase the risk of new-onset diabetes, may exhibit positive effects on renal function and urinary albumin excretion and the risk of drug–drug interactions is low. Therefore, it seems that pitavastatin should preferentially be considered in the treatment of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients or at risk of developing diabetes.

Pharmacological modulation of dietary lipid-induced cerebral capillary dysfunction: Considerations for reducing risk for Alzheimer's disease

An increasing body of evidence suggests that cerebrovascular dysfunction and microvessel disease precede the evolution of hallmark pathological features that characterise Alzheimer's disease (AD), consistent with a causal association for onset or progression. Recent studies, principally in genetically unmanipulated animal models, suggest that chronic ingestion of diets enriched in saturated fats and cholesterol may compromise blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity resulting in inappropriate blood-to-brain extravasation of plasma proteins, including lipid macromolecules that may be enriched in amyloid-β (Aβ). Brain parenchymal retention of blood proteins and lipoprotein bound Aβ is associated with heightened neurovascular inflammation, altered redox homeostasis and nitric oxide (NO) metabolism. Therefore, it is a reasonable proposition that lipid-lowering agents may positively modulate BBB integrity and by extension attenuate risk or progression of AD. In addition to their robust lipid lowering properties, reported beneficial effects of lipid-lowering agents were attributed to their pleiotropic properties via modulation of inflammation, oxidative stress, NO and Aβ metabolism. The review is a contemporary consideration of a complex body of literature intended to synthesise focussed consideration of mechanisms central to regulation of BBB function and integrity. Emphasis is given to dietary fat driven significant epidemiological evidence consistent with heightened risk amongst populations consuming greater amounts of saturated fats and cholesterol. In addition, potential neurovascular benefits associated with the use of hypolipidemic statins, probucol and fenofibrate are also presented in the context of lipid-lowering and pleiotropic properties.

Risk identification and possible countermeasures for muscle adverse effects during statin therapy

The use of statins for cardiovascular disease prevention is clearly supported by clinical evidence. However, in January 2014 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration released an advice on statin risk reporting that "statin benefit is indisputable, but they need to be taken with care and knowledge of their side effects". Among them the by far most common complication is myopathy, ranging from common but clinically benign myalgia to rare but life-threatening rhabdomyolysis. This class side effect appears to be dose dependent, with more lipophilic statin (i.e., simvastatin) carrying a higher overall risk. Hence, to minimize statin-associated myopathy, clinicians should take into consideration a series of factors that potentially increase this risk (i.e., drug-drug interactions, female gender, advanced age, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism and vitamin D deficiency). Whenever it is appropriate to stop statin treatment, the recommendations are to stay off statin until resolution of symptoms or normalization of creatine kinase values. Afterwards, clinicians have several options to treat dyslipidemia, including the use of a lower dose of the same statin, intermittent non-daily dosing of statin, initiation of a different statin, alone or in combination with nonstatin lipid-lowering agents, and substitution with red yeast rice.

Statins and skeletal muscles toxicity: from clinical trials to everyday practice

The mechanism(s) underlying the occurrence of statin-induced myopathy are ill defined, but the results of observational studies and clinical trials provide compelling evidence that skeletal muscle toxicity is a frequent, dose-dependent, adverse event associated with all statins. It has been suggested that reduced availability of metabolites produced by the mevalonate pathway rather than intracellular cholesterol lowering per se might be the primary trigger of toxicity, however other alternative explanations have gained credibility in recent years. Aim of this review is: (i) to describe the molecular mechanisms associated to statin induced myopathy including defects in isoprenoids synthesis followed by altered prenylation of small GTPase, such as Ras and Rab proteins; (ii) to present the emerging aspects on pharmacogenetics, including CYP3A4, OATP1B1 and glycine amidinotransferase (GATM) polymorphisms impacting either statin bioavailability or creatine synthesis; (iii) to summarize the available epidemiological evidences; and (iii) to discuss the concepts that would be of interest to the clinicians for the daily management of patients with statin induced myopathy. The interplay between drug-environment and drug-drug interaction in the context of different genetic settings contribute to statins and skeletal muscles toxicity. Until specific assays/algorithms able to combine genetic scores with drug-drug-environment interaction to identify patients at risk of myopathies will become available, clinicians should continue to monitor carefully patients on polytherapy which include statins and be ready to reconsider dose, statin or switching to alternative treatments. The beneficial effects of adding agents to provide the muscle with the metabolites, such as CoQ10, affected by statin treatment will also be addressed.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of the two recently developed statins, rosuvastatin and pitavastatin

INTRODUCTION

Statins are the cornerstone of lipid-lowering therapy to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease. Rosuvastatin and pitavastatin are the two recently developed statins with less potential for drug interaction resulting in improved safety profiles.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of rosuvastatin and pitavastatin. The materials reviewed were identified by searching PubMed for publications using 'rosuvastatin', 'pitavastatin', 'statins', 'pharmacokinetics' and 'drug interaction' as the search terms.

EXPERT OPINION

Rosuvastatin and pitavastatin have favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles as their disposition does not depend on or is only marginally influenced by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, thus potentially reducing the risk of drug-drug interactions of these two statins with other drugs known to inhibit CYP enzymes. However, drug transporters play a significant role in the disposition of rosuvastatin and pitavastatin and drug interactions may occur through these. Genetic polymorphisms in drug transporters may also affect the pharmacokinetics, drug interactions and/or the lipid-lowering effect of these statins to a different extent.

Pitavastatin in cardiometabolic disease: therapeutic profile

Statins effectively lower low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and reduce cardiovascular risk in people with dyslipidemia and cardiometabolic diseases such as Metabolic syndrome (MetS) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). In addition to elevated levels of LDL-C, people with these conditions often have other lipid-related risk factors, such as high levels of triglycerides, low levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), and a preponderance of highly atherogenic, small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles. The optimal management of dyslipidemia in people with MetS or T2D should therefore address each of these risk factors in addition to LDL-C. Although statins typically have similar effects on LDL-C levels, differences in chemical structure and pharmacokinetic profile can lead to variations in pleiotropic effects, adverse event profiles and drug-drug interactions. The choice of statin should therefore depend on the characteristics and needs of the individual patient. Compared with other statins, pitavastatin has distinct pharmacological features that translate into a broad range of actions on both apolipoprotein-B-containing and apolipoprotein-A-containing lipoproteins. Studies show that pitavastatin 1 to 4 mg is well tolerated and significantly improves LDL-C and triglyceride levels to a similar or greater degree than comparable doses of atorvastatin, simvastatin or pravastatin, irrespective of diabetic status. Moreover, whereas most statins show inconsistent effects on HDL-C levels, pitavastatin-treated patients routinely experience clinically significant elevations in HDL-C that are maintained and even increased over the long term. In addition to increasing high-density lipoprotein quantity, pitavastatin appears to improve high-density lipoprotein function and to slow the progression of atherosclerotic plaques by modifying high-density lipoprotein-related inflammation and oxidation, both of which are common in patients with MetS and T2D. When choosing a statin, it is important to note that patients with MetS have an increased risk of developing T2D and that some statins can exacerbate this risk via adverse effects on glucose regulation. Unlike many statins, pitavastatin appears to have a neutral and even beneficial effect on glucose regulation, making it a useful treatment option in this high-risk group of patients. Together with pitavastatin’s beneficial effects on the cardiometabolic lipid profile and its low potential for drug-drug interactions, this suggests that pitavastatin might be a useful lipid-lowering option for people with cardiometabolic disease.

Effects of grapefruit juice and SLCO1B1 388A>G polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of pitavastatin

Pitavastatin undergoes little hepatic metabolism but it is a substrate for uptake and efflux transporters, particularly OATP1B1 (gene SLCO1B1). A previous study in 8 Japanese healthy subjects showed that co-administration with grapefruit juice (GFJ) resulted in a small increase in systemic exposure to pitavastatin. We examined whether common polymorphisms in SLCO1B1 might influence the pharmacokinetics of pitavastatin or the interaction with GFJ. Twelve Chinese healthy male volunteers took pitavastatin 2 mg orally with water or with GFJ on separate occasions and plasma concentrations of pitavastatin acid and lactone were measured over 48 h. GFJ increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-48 h) for both pitavastatin acid and lactone by 14% (p<0.05). Subjects with SLCO1B1 *1b/*1b haplotype (388GG-521TT) had 47% and 44% higher systemic exposure for pitavastatin acid and lactone than the SLCO1B1 *1a carriers (388AA/AG-521TT, p<0.05 and p=0.005, respectively). The SLCO1B1 388A>G polymorphism, which increases transporter activity for some statins, was associated with higher plasma levels of pitavastatin acid and lactone in subjects with the homozygous variant indicating decreased hepatic uptake. Co-administration of pitavastatin with GFJ resulted in a small but significant increase in plasma levels in healthy Chinese subjects.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between pitavastatin and valsartan: a randomized, open-labeled crossover study in healthy male Korean volunteers

BACKGROUND

Pitavastatin, a competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, and valsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, are used concurrently in some patients who are both hyperlipidemic and hypertensive. However, to date, no published studies have explored whether there is an interaction between pitavastatin and valsartan.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between pitavastatin and valsartan in healthy male volunteers in Korea.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label crossover study was conducted in healthy male Korean volunteers. In varying sequences, each subject received pitavastatin 2 × 2 mg, valsartan 2 × 160 mg, and both treatments, once daily for 7 consecutive days, with a 7-day washout period between each treatment period. Plasma samples were obtained at steady state for the pharmacokinetic evaluation of pitavastatin and valsartan. Pharmacodynamic assessment included lipid profiles and vital sign measurements (systolic and diastolic blood pressure [SBP and DBP, respectively] and pulse rate [PR]). A safety profile assessment, which included vital sign measurements, ECG, and clinical laboratory testing, was performed in each subject.

RESULTS

A total of 24 subjects were enrolled (mean age, 30.5 years [range, 23.0-45.0 years]; mean body weight, 71.2 kg [range, 56.1-86.0 kg]; and mean body mass index, 23.2 kg/m(2) [range, 19.2-25.8 kg/m(2)]). The 95% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of AUC(τ) and C(max,ss) of pitavastatin were 0.97 to 1.11 and 0.73 to 1.09, respectively. The 95% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of AUC(τ) and C(max,ss) of valsartan were 0.90 to 1.27 and 0.81 to 1.29. Pitavastatin administered as monotherapy and in combination with valsartan was associated with significantly lowered total cholesterol and LDL-C compared with valsartan monotherapy (both, P < 0.05). Differences in lipid-lowering effects were not statistically significant between pitavastatin monotherapy and pitavastatin combined with valsartan. Valsartan monotherapy and valsartan combined with pitavastatin were associated with significantly lower SBP and DBP compared with baseline (both, P < 0.05), although no significant changes in PR were observed. No significant differences in BP or PR changes were noted between concurrent administration of valsartan monotherapy compared with pitavastatin + valsartan. There were no serious AEs reported, and none of the subjects discontinued the study due to AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic profiles of pitavastatin and valsartan administered as monotherapy were comparable to combination treatment in these healthy male Korean volunteers, suggesting that individual pharmacokinetic properties are not significantly affected by concurrent administration. The concurrent administration of pitavastatin and valsartan was generally well tolerated. The findings from the present study provide a basis for a larger study in hypertensive patients with hyperlipidemia.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of pitavastatin by formulation and ethnic group: an open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic study in healthy Caucasian and Japanese men

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pitavastatin is a highly effective lipid-lowering drug (approved dose range 1-4 mg/day) with a distinctive metabolic pathway that has a low potential for drug interactions. The efficacy and safety of pitavastatin have been characterized in a broad clinical development programme conducted initially in Japanese patients. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of the European (EU) and Japanese (JP) formulations of pitavastatin 2 mg in healthy Japanese and Caucasian men, and to assess whether the bioavailability of each formulation was similar in the two ethnic groups.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic study, healthy men aged 18-45 years were randomized to receive: the JP formulation of pitavastatin 2 mg followed by the EU formulation; or the EU formulation of pitavastatin 2 mg followed by the JP formulation. The main outcome measures were maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) during a dosage interval (τ) [AUC(τ)] and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) for pitavastatin and its main (inactive) metabolite pitavastatin lactone. Plasma concentrations of pitavastatin and pitavastatin lactone were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.

RESULTS

Forty-eight Caucasian and 12 Japanese men completed the study. Compared with the Japanese men, the Caucasian men were of greater mean body weight (76.1 vs 58.9 kg), height (180.8 vs 170.8 cm) and body mass index (23.2 vs 20.2 kg/m2). Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the pharmacokinetic parameters of pitavastatin demonstrated bioequivalence of the EU and JP formulations: GMRs and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fell within the range 80-125% in Caucasian men and in Caucasian and Japanese groups combined for pitavastatin C(max) (combined analysis: GMR 103.1% [90% CI 96.0, 110.6]), AUC(τ) (GMR 99.6% [90% CI 95.5, 104.0]), and AUC(∞) (GMR 104.2% [90% CI 96.2, 112.8]). After adjusting for age and body weight in the pooled formulation analysis, bioequivalence between the Caucasian and Japanese groups was similarly demonstrated for pitavastatin C(max) (GMR 96.8% [90% CI 90.2, 103.8]), AUC(τ) (GMR 98.3% [90% CI 94.2, 102.7]) and AUC(∞) (GMR 85.9% [90% CI 81.1, 91.0]).

CONCLUSION

The EU and JP formulations of pitavastatin showed pharmacokinetic bioequivalence, and there were no clinically relevant differences in exposure to pitavastatin between Caucasian and Japanese participants when differences in body weight were taken into account.

Pharmacological actions of statins: a critical appraisal in the management of cancer

Statins, among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide, are cholesterol-lowering agents used to manage and prevent cardiovascular and coronary heart diseases. Recently, a multifaceted action in different physiological and pathological conditions has been also proposed for statins, beyond anti-inflammation and neuroprotection. Statins have been shown to act through cholesterol-dependent and -independent mechanisms and are able to affect several tissue functions and modulate specific signal transduction pathways that could account for statin pleiotropic effects. Typically, statins are prescribed in middle-aged or elderly patients in a therapeutic regimen covering a long life span during which metabolic processes, aging, and concomitant novel diseases, including cancer, could occur. In this context, safety, toxicity, interaction with other drugs, and the state of health have to be taken into account in subjects treated with statins. Some evidence has shown a dichotomous effect of statins with either cancer-inhibiting or -promoting effects. To date, clinical trials failed to demonstrate a reduced cancer occurrence in statin users and no sufficient data are available to define the long-term effects of statin use over a period of 10 years. Moreover, results from clinical trials performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of statins in cancer did not suggest statin use as chemotherapeutic or adjuvant agents. Here, we reviewed the pharmacology of the statins, providing a comprehensive update of the current knowledge of their effects on tissues, biological processes, and pathological conditions, and we dissected the disappointing evidence on the possible future use of statin-based drugs in cancer therapy.

[Specific considerations on the prescription and therapeutic interchange of statins]

OBJECTIVE

The pharmaceutical industry currently offers six different statins in Spain and there is one more soon to be available. Choosing the most appropriate drug and dose is determined by the therapeutic target (reduction in LDL-C levels). Statin doses that decrease LDL-C at the same percentage are considered equivalent. Evaluating the pharmacokinetic characteristics of each statin can be useful when setting selection criteria, helping to determine which statin may be more appropriate for a patient based on their individual characteristics and on the other co-administered drugs.

METHODS

We reviewed the pharmacokinetics properties of each statin and its possible involvement in drug interactions.

RESULTS

CYP3A4 was responsible for the metabolism of lovastatin, simvastatin and atorvastatin; fluvastatin depends on CYP2C9; P-glycoprotein is responsible for decreased atorvastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin and lovastatin concentrations. The OATPA1B1 transporter involved in all statins' access to the hepatocyte, except for fluvastatin, is essential for rosuvastatin and pravastatin. These circumstances cause those drugs inhibiting or inducing isoenzymes or transporters' activity not to have the same effect on the different statins.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics is important when choosing the best statin and could be a limitation in the use of interchange therapeutic programmes when other drugs are present.

Place of pitavastatin in the statin armamentarium: promising evidence for a role in diabetes mellitus

Inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, known as statins, have revolutionized the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and coronary artery disease prevention. However, there are considerable issues regarding statin safety and further development of residual risk control, particularly for diabetic and metabolic syndrome patients. Pitavastatin is a potent statin with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering effects comparable to those of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin. Pitavastatin has a high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol raising effect, may improve insulin resistance, and has little influence on glucose metabolism. Considering these factors along with its unique pharmacokinetic properties, which suggest minimal drug–drug interaction, pitavastatin could provide an alternative treatment choice, especially in patients with glucose intolerance or diabetes mellitus. Many clinical trials are now underway to test the clinical efficacy of pitavastatin in various settings and are expected to provide further information.