Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prone position: a simplified method for outpatients

Prone restraint death: Possible role of the Valsalva maneuver

There is an on-going debate about the safety of prone restraint and the exact role of the prone position in physical restraint death. Cardiac arrest in prone restraint death is essentially the end-result of a violent physical altercation wherein a combative individual suddenly loses consciousness while trying to counteract an opposing force. The direct correlations of increased static weight force with decreased inferior vena cava diameter, decreased cardiac output, and decreased stroke volume in prone restraint studies suggest that decreased venous return and decreased cardiac output could have a significant role to play in prone restraint death. Although the degree of changes observed in those studies might not be sufficient to cause cardiac arrest, they could predispose people who instinctively try to free themselves of the restraints to severe complications. The Valsalva maneuver, or forceful expiration against a closed airway, is frequently performed spontaneously in daily activities involving straining and resistance exercise, but has never been considered in restraint death. Pre-existing diminished venous return could increase the risk of major complications in individuals performing the Valsalva maneuver. A substantial decrease in venous return and cardiac output could increase the risk of cerebral hypoperfusion, loss of consciousness, hypoventilation, and sudden death. By increasing the risk of increased intra-abdominal pressure and its negative effect on venous return, high body mass index may be a significant risk factor in prone restraint death. The Valsalva maneuver may have different roles in prone restraint cardiac arrest and might be overlooked in prone restraint death.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation May Not Stop Glutamate Release in the Cerebral Cortex

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may not be sufficient to halt the progression of brain damage. Using extracellular glutamate concentration as a marker for neuronal damage, we quantitatively evaluated the degree of brain damage during resuscitation without return of spontaneous circulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Extracellular cerebral glutamate concentration was measured with a microdialysis probe every 2 minutes for 40 minutes after electrical stimulation-induced cardiac arrest without return of spontaneous circulation in Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats were divided into 3 groups (7 per group) according to the treatment received during the 40 minutes observation period: mechanical ventilation without chest compression (group V); mechanical ventilation and chest compression (group VC) and; ventilation, chest compression and brain hypothermia (group VCH). Chest compression (20 min) and hypothermia (40 min) were initiated 6 minutes after the onset of cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

Glutamate concentration increased in all groups after cardiac arrest. Although after the onset of chest compression, glutamate concentration showed a significant difference at 2 min and reached the maximum at 6 min (VC group; 284±48 μmol/L vs. V group 398±126 μmol/L, P =0.003), there was no difference toward the end of chest compression (513±61 μmol/L vs. 588±103 μmol/L, P =0.051). In the VCH group, the initial increase in glutamate concentration was suddenly suppressed 2 minutes after the onset of brain hypothermia.

CONCLUSIONS

CPR alone reduced the progression of brain damage for a limited period but CPR in combination with brain cooling strongly suppressed increases in glutamate levels.

Management of Intraoperative Cardiac Arrest

Perioperative arrests are both uncommon and heterogeneous and have not been described or studied to the same extent as cardiac arrest in the community. These crises are usually witnessed, frequently anticipated, and involve a rescuer physician with knowledge of the patient's comorbidities and coexisting anesthetic or surgically related pathophysiology ultimately leading to better outcomes. This article reviews the most probable causes of intraoperative arrest and their management.

Prone Dispatch-Directed CPR in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Two Successful Cases

Historically, dispatch-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) protocols only allow chest compression instructions to be delivered for patients able to be placed in the traditional supine position. For patients who are unable to be positioned supine, the telecommunicator and caller have no option except to continue attempts to position supine, which may result in delayed or no chest compressions being delivered prior to emergency medical services arrival. Any delay or lack of bystander chest compressions may result in worsening clinical outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims. We present the first two cases, to the best of our knowledge, of successfully delivered, bystander-administered, prone CPR instructions by a trained telecommunicator for two OHCA victims unable to be positioned supine.

Position-related anesthesiologic considerations and surgical outcomes of prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a review of the current literature

The aim of the current study was to perform a critical review of existing literature and report the potential morbidity of patient positioning during urological surgeries as well as evaluate the surgical outcomes and anesthesiologic benefits and risks of prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A narrative review of the current literature has been performed. Articles related to position-related injuries and complications under general anesthesia in prone positions were selected, studied, and considered for the current review. We found that under general anesthesia, the prone position improved the oxygenation of patients and increased the elimination of carbon dioxide. A potential risk for position-related anesthesiologic side effects was reported for longer spine surgeries in a prone position. The injuries and position-related side effects were extremely rare following prone PCNL since the mean duration of the procedure was significantly shorter than that of spine surgery. In conclusion, the prone PCNL remains the most often utilized and preferred approach globally with well-established success and complication rates. Clinical outcomes of prone PCNL do not demonstrate an increased rate of anesthesiologic complications compared to the supine approach. Standardization of turnover of the position, and reduction of the operative time warrant a faster and complication-free recovery.

Out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic: changes in demographics, outcomes and management

During the COVID-19 pandemic, prehospital and hospital services were put under great stress because of limited resources and increased workloads. One expected effect was the increased number of out-of-hospital (OHCA) and in-hospital (IHCA) cardiac arrests that occurred during 2020 compared to previous years. Both direct and indirect mechanisms were involved. In the former case, although the exact mechanisms by which Sars-Cov-2 causes cardiac arrest (CA) are still unknown, severe hypoxia, a dysregulated immune host response and sepsis are probably implicated and are often seen in COVID-19 patients with poor outcomes. In the latter case, the strain on hospitals, changes in treatment protocols, governments' actions to limit the spread of the disease and fear of the contagion naturally affected treatment efficacy and disrupted the CA chain of survival; as expected in OHCA, only a small proportion of patients were positive to COVID-19, and yet reported outcomes were worse during the pandemic. CA patient characteristics were reported, along with modifications in patient management. In this review, we summarise the evidence to date regarding OHCA and IHCA epidemiology and management during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Relevance in current times

The most common and recommended position for performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the supine position. However, clinicians may encounter situations when patients suffer cardiac arrest in prone position. Prone CPR has been described previously in a number of settings, most commonly intraoperative. In the current COVID-19 era, with more patients being nursed in prone position, an increase in the incidence of cardiac arrests requiring prone CPR is expected. Hence most of the resuscitation guidelines have made prone CPR a vital component of their recommendations. To date, most of our health-care workers have limited knowledge about prone resuscitation and the literature surrounding it. Nonetheless, with the current evidence at hand, it seems to be a reliable method of providing resuscitation and all health-care workers should be well versed with it. Thus, the goal of this narrative review is to try and fill the gaps in our knowledge about prone CPR. Literature search was done on PubMed, Medline, EMBASE using keywords ‘CPR’, ‘Resuscitation’, ‘Prone Position’, ‘Prone’, ‘Prone CPR’.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation for cardiac arrest when patients are in the prone position: A systematic review

AIM

To perform a systematic review of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and/or defibrillation in the prone position compared to turning the patient supine prior to starting CPR and/or defibrillation.

METHODS

The search included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL Plus, and medRxiv on December 9, 2020. The population included adults and children in any setting with cardiac arrest while in the prone position. The outcomes included arterial blood pressure and end-tidal capnography during CPR, time to start CPR and defibrillation, return of spontaneous circulation, survival and survival with favorable neurologic outcome to discharge, 30 days or longer. ROBINS-I was performed to assess risk of bias for observational studies.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 29 case reports (32 individual cases), two prospective observational studies, and two simulation studies. The observational studies enrolled 17 patients who were declared dead in the supine position and reported higher mean systolic blood pressure from CPR in prone position (72 mmHg vs 48 mmHg, p < 0.005; 79 ± 20 mmHg vs 55 ± 20 mmHg, p = 0.028). One simulation study reported a faster time to defibrillation in the prone position. Return of spontaneous circulation, survival to discharge or 30 days were reported in adult and paediatric case reports. Critical risk of bias limited our ability to perform pooled analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a limited number of observational studies and case reports comparing prone versus supine CPR and/or defibrillation. Prone CPR may be a reasonable option if immediate supination is difficult or poses unacceptable risks to the patient.

2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain

OBJECTIVES

The disease COVID-19 produces serious complications that can lead to cardiorespiratory arrest. Quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can improve patient prognosis. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of the specialty of Anesthesiology in the management of CPR during the pandemic.

METHODS

A survey was carried out with Google Forms consisting of 19 questions. The access link to the questionnaire was sent by email by the Spanish Society of Anesthesia (SEDAR) to all its members.

RESULTS

225 responses were obtained. The regions with the highest participation were: Madrid, Catalonia, Valencia and Andalusia. 68.6%% of the participants work in public hospitals. 32% of the participants habitually work in intensive care units (ICU), however, 62.1% have attended critical COVID-19 in the ICU and 72.6% have anesthetized them in the operating room. 26,3% have attended some cardiac arrest, 16,8% of the participants admitted to lead the manoeuvres, 16,8% detailed that it had been another department, and 66,2% was part of the team, but did not lead the assistance. Most of the CPR was performed in supine, only 5% was done in prone position. 54.6% of participants had not taken any course of Advance Life Support (ALS) in the last 2 years. 97.7% of respondents think that Anesthesia should lead the in-hospital CPR.

CONCLUSION

The specialty of Anesthesiology has actively participated in the care of the critically ill patient and in the management of CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, training and/or updating in ALS is required.

Optimizing hemodynamic function during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an update on hemodynamics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to describe emerging therapies to optimize perfusion.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cadaver studies have shown large inter-individual variations in blood distribution and anatomical placement of the heart during chest compressions. Using advanced CT techniques the studies have demonstrated atrial and slight right ventricular compression, but no direct compression of the left ventricle. A hemodynamic-directed CPR strategy may overcome this by allowing individualized hand-placement, drug dosing, and compression rate and depth. Through animal studies and one clinical before-and-after study head-up CPR has shown promising results as a potential strategy to improve cerebral perfusion. Two studies have demonstrated that placement of an endovascular balloon occlusion in the aorta (REBOA) can be performed during ongoing CPR.

SUMMARY

Modern imaging techniques may help increase our understanding on the mechanism of forward flow during CPR. This could provide new information on how to optimize perfusion. Head-up CPR and the use of REBOA during CPR are novel methods that might improve cerebral perfusion during CPR; both techniques do, however, still await clinical testing.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Prone Position in the Operating Room or in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review

The prone position is commonly used in certain surgical procedures and to improve oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Cardiorespiratory arrest (CRA) in this position may be more challenging to treat because care providers trained in conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may not be familiar with CPR in the prone position. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of current evidence regarding the methodology, efficacy, and experience of CPR in the prone position, in patients with the airway already secured. The search strategy included PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. All studies published up to April 2020 including CRA or CPR in the prone position were included. Of the 268 articles located, 52 articles were included: 5 review articles, 8 clinical guidelines in which prone CPR was mentioned, 4 originals, 27 case reports, and 8 editorials or correspondences. Data from reviewed clinical studies confirm that CPR in the prone position is a reasonable alternative to supine CPR when the latter cannot be immediately implemented, and the airway is already secured. Defibrillation in the prone position is also possible. Familiarizing clinicians with CPR and defibrillation in the prone position may improve CPR performance in the prone position.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain

Objetivos

La enfermedad por COVID-19 produce graves complicaciones que pueden derivar en parada cardiorrespiratoria (PCR). Una resucitación cardiopulmonar (RCP) de calidad puede mejorar el pronóstico de los pacientes. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el desempeño de la especialidad de Anestesiología y Reanimación en el manejo de la RCP durante la pandemia en España.

Métodos

Se realizó una encuesta con Google Forms que constaba de 19 preguntas. El link de acceso al cuestionario fue enviado vía correo electrónico por la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor (SEDAR) a todos sus miembros.

Resultados

Se obtuvieron 225 respuestas. Las provincias con mayor participación fueron: Madrid, Cataluña, Valencia y Andalucía. El 68,6%% de los participantes trabajan en la sanidad pública. Un 32% de los participantes se dedican habitualmente a los cuidados intensivos; sin embargo, el 62,1% ha atendido a enfermos de COVID-19 en cuidados críticos y un 72,6% los ha anestesiado en el quirófano. El 26,3% ha atendido alguna PCR, el 16,8% lideró las maniobras, el 16,8% presenció la PCR pero no participó en la RCP, y el 66,2% formó parte del equipo, pero no lideró la asistencia. La mayoría de las RCP se realizaron en supino, sólo el 5% fueron ejecutadas en prono. El 54,6% de los participantes no habían realizado ningún curso de soporte vital avanzado (SVA) en los últimos dos años. El 97,7% de los participantes opinan que Anestesia debe liderar la RCP intrahospitalaria.

Conclusión

La especialidad de Anestesiología y Reanimación ha participado activamente en la atención del paciente crítico y en el manejo de la RCP durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Sin embargo, resulta necesaria la formación y/o actualización en SVA.

Recommendations on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). Executive summary

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has created new scenarios that require modifications to the usual cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocols. The current clinical guidelines on the management of cardiorespiratory arrest do not include recommendations for situations that apply to this context. Therefore, the National Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Plan of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), in collaboration with the Spanish Group of Pediatric and Neonatal CPR and with the Teaching Life Support in Primary Care program of the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (SEMFyC), have written these recommendations, which are divided into five parts that address the main aspects for each healthcare setting. This article consists of an executive summary of them.

Prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scoping and expanded grey literature review for the COVID-19 pandemic

AIM

To identify and summarize the available science on prone resuscitation. To determine the value of undertaking a systematic review on this topic; and to identify knowledge gaps to aid future research, education and guidelines.

METHODS

This review was guided by specific methodological framework and reporting items (PRISMA-ScR). We included studies, cases and grey literature regarding prone position and CPR/cardiac arrest. The databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus and Google Scholar. Expanded grey literature searching included internet search engine, targeted websites and social media.

RESULTS

Of 453 identified studies, 24 (5%) studies met our inclusion criteria. There were four prone resuscitation-relevant studies examining: blood and tidal volumes generated by prone compressions; prone compression quality metrics on a manikin; and chest computed tomography scans for compression landmarking. Twenty case reports/series described the resuscitation of 25 prone patients. Prone compression quality was assessed by invasive blood pressure monitoring, exhaled carbon dioxide and pulse palpation. Recommended compression location was zero-to-two vertebral segments below the scapulae. Twenty of 25 cases (80%) survived prone resuscitation, although few cases reported long term outcome (neurological status at hospital discharge). Seven cases described full neurological recovery.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review did not identify sufficient evidence to justify a systematic review or modified resuscitation guidelines. It remains reasonable to initiate resuscitation in the prone position if turning the patient supine would lead to delays or risk to providers or patients. Prone resuscitation quality can be judged using end-tidal CO₂, and arterial pressure tracing, with patients turned supine if insufficient.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prone position: A scoping review

Introduction

The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 brought to the fore prone positioning as treatment for patients with acute respiratory failure. With the increasing number of patients in prone position, both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated, cardiac arrest in this position is more likely to occur.

This scoping review aimed to summarize the available evidence on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prone position (‘reverse CPR’) and knowledge or research gaps to be further evaluated. The protocol of this scoping review was prospectively registered on 10th May 2020 in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/nfuh9).

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and pre-print repositories (bioRxiv and medRxiv) for simulation, pre-clinical and clinical studies on reverse CPR until 31st May 2020.

Results

We included 1 study on manikins, 31 case reports (29 during surgery requiring prone position) and 2 nonrandomized studies describing reverse CPR. No studies were found regarding reverse CPR in patients with COVID-19.

Conclusions

Even if the algorithms provided by the guidelines on basic and advanced life support remain valid in cardiac arrest in prone position, differences exist in the methods of performing CPR. There is no clear evidence of superiority in terms of effectiveness of reverse compared to supine CPR in patients with cardiac arrest occurring in prone position. The quality of evidence is low and knowledge gaps (e.g. protocols, training of healthcare personnel, devices for skill acquisition) should be fulfilled by further research. Meanwhile, a case-by-case evaluation of patient and setting characteristics should guide the decision on how to start CPR in such cases.

•

Prone positioning has been used in patients with COVID-19

•

An increasing number of cardiac arrests is expected to occur in prone position

•

There is no clear evidence of superiority of reverse compared to supine cardiopulmonary resuscitation

•

Knowledge gaps should be fulfilled by further research

[Recommendations on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). Executive summary]

La pandemia por SARS-CoV-2 ha generado nuevos escenarios que requieren modificaciones de los protocolos habituales de reanimación cardiopulmonar. Las guías clínicas vigentes sobre el manejo de la parada cardiorrespiratoria no incluyen recomendaciones para situaciones aplicables a este contexto. Por ello, el Plan Nacional de Reanimación Cardiopulmonar de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias, en colaboración con el Grupo Español de RCP Pediátrica y Neonatal y con el programa de Enseñanza de Soporte Vital en Atención Primaria de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, ha redactado las siguientes recomendaciones, que están divididas en 5 partes que tratan los principales aspectos para cada entorno asistencial. En este artículo se presenta un resumen ejecutivo de las mismas.

Prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation in elderly undergoing posterior spinal fusion with laminectomy

An 80-year-old male patient presented with 2 weeks history of low back pain undergoing posterior spinal fusion with laminectomy in the prone position. The patient was induced with fentanyl, propofol, and rocuronium, and then he was positioned in the prone position. After 6 h of starting the surgery, the patient started to be hypotension and bradycardia followed by pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Code blue was activated intraoperatively with immediate initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the prone position and multiple epinephrine boluses. Fortunately, the patient had return of spontaneous circulation. After stabilization, he was taken for computed tomography scan which showed massive pulmonary embolization and management was continued in the intensive care unit. CPR in the prone position has shown to be effective for return of spontaneous circulation after PEA.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Unusual Techniques for Unusual Situations

Background:

The cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in prone position has been dealt with in 2010 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines but have not been reviewed in 2015 guidelines. The guidelines for patients presenting with cardiac arrest under general anesthesia in lateral decubitus position and regarding resuscitation in confined spaces like airplanes are also not available in AHA guidelines. This article is an attempt to highlight the techniques adopted for resuscitation in these unusual situations.

Aims:

This study aims to find out the methodology and efficacy in nonconventional CPR approaches such as CPR in prone, CPR in lateral position, and CPR in confined spaces.

Methods:

We conducted a literature search using MeSH search strings such as CPR + Prone position, CPR + lateral Position, and CPR + confined spaces.

Results:

No randomized controlled trials are available. The literature search gives a handful of case reports, some simulation- and manikin-based studies but none can qualify for class I evidence. The successful outcome of CPR performed in prone position has shown compressions delivered on the thoracic spine with the same rate and force as they were delivered during supine position. A hard surface is required under the patient to provide uniform force and sternal counter pressure. Two rescuer technique for providing successful chest compression in lateral position has been documented in the few case reports published. Over the head CPR and straddle (STR), CPR has been utilized for CPR in confined spaces. Ventilation in operating rooms was taken care by an advanced airway in situ.

Conclusion:

A large number of studies of high quality are required to be conducted to determine the efficacy of CPR in such positions.

Effects of kneeling posture on chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in males

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To study the effects of kneeling posture on chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in males.

BACKGROUND

Efficiency of chest compression during CPR affected millions of victims over the world. There are still no clear guidelines on kneeling posture that a rescuer should adopt in performing CPR.

DESIGN

A self-controlled repeated-measures design was applied in this study. The efficiency of chest compression on a mannequin when three kneeling postures were adopted (farthest, self-adjusted and nearest) was analysed.

METHODS

Eighteen participants with qualified first-aid certificate were recruited. Each participant had to perform three sessions of CPR, using one of the three different kneeling postures (i.e., farthest, self-adjusted and nearest) in each. They were performed in a random order chosen by drawing lots. Each session consisted of five cycles of CPR in each kneeling posture. Each cycle consisted of 30 strokes of chest compression performed within 18 s with a 4-s pause between consecutive cycles. Each session lasted for 2 min. The participants were allowed to rest for 10 min on a chair between sessions. Efficiency of chest compression was quantified by compression force, joint angle, heart rate and energy expenditure. After each session of CPR, the participants were surveyed about their rate of perceived exertion.

RESULTS

Efficiency of chest compression in self-adjusted and nearest kneeling postures was significantly better than that of the farthest one. While the self-adjusted and nearest postures had the similar effect, most of the participants preferred self-adjusted kneeling posture because of lower rate of perceived exertion.

CONCLUSION

The use of the self-adjusted and nearest kneeling postures during CPR in males resulted in more effective chest compression with lower perceived exertion, compared with the farthest kneeling posture. Both these positions can be objectively recommended to enhance the efficiency of chest compression and thereby increase the cardiac arrest survival rate.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

More consistent force and higher endurance could be achieved by performing CPR at self-adjusted kneeling posture.

[Successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prone position]

In certain surgical positions standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) cannot be carried out. It is sometimes impossible or time-consuming to establish a supine position without increasing the no-flow-time and therefore creating a negative outcome of the patient. The case of CPR in a prone position during an emergency evacuation of a cerebellar hematoma is reported. The resuscitation was initiated in the prone position to decrease the no-flow-time. This was very effective because the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) started before turning the patient to the supine position. Resuscitation in the prone position in this case was equally as effective as in the traditional supine position.

Cerebral oxygenation during hypoxia and resuscitation by using near-infrared spectroscopy in newborn piglets

BACKGROUND

Hypoxic events and cardiac arrest may cause brain damage in critical infants. This study investigated cerebral tissue oxygenation and oxygen extraction in a piglet model of hypoxic events, cardiac arrest and effects of resuscitation.

METHODS

For the hypoxia experiment, anesthetized newborn piglets were randomized to a hypoxia group (n = 8) with decreasing ventilatory rate to 0, and a control group (n = 8) with no hypoxic conditions. Regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (rScO2, detected by near-infrared spectroscopy) and oxygen saturation were recorded every 5 minutes for 100 minutes. Fractional cerebral tissue oxygen extraction (FTOE) was calculated as (arterial oxygen saturation [SaO2] - rScO2)/SaO2. For the resuscitation experiment, animals were grouped as hypoxia-no CPR (n = 4), control-no CPR (n = 4), and control-CPR (n = 4) after cardiac arrest. Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed on the control-CPR group and observed for 30 minutes.

RESULTS

Immediate and significant changes in rScO2, and gradual changes in FTOE were observed during the hypoxia experiment. In the resuscitation experiment, no significant differences in rScO2 were found between groups. However, the highest FTOE was observed in the control-CPR group.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive monitoring of rScO2 and evaluating FTOE changes during hypoxia and resuscitation may help clinicians evaluate brain tissue oxygenation and viability.