Left ventricular aneurysm repair: a comparison of linear versus patch remodeling

Impact of surgical ventricular restoration on early and long-term outcomes of patients with left ventricular aneurysm: A single-center experience

Left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) is a common complication of myocardial infarction. However, the optimal treatment for LVA remains controversial.In this retrospective study, we analyzed the early and long-term clinical consequences of surgical ventricular restoration on 102 patients who had undergone repair between January, 2005 and January, 2015. The LVA repair approaches comprised of patch plasty (n = 28), linear repair (n = 40), and plication repair (n = 34).Patient demographics were 60.8% male, and the mean age was 60.5 ± 7.2 years. The in-hospital mortality rate was 7.8% (8/102), including 6 patients who died from low cardiac output and 2 from multiorgan failure. During the early postoperative period, left ventricular sizes significantly decreased in the patch plasty and linear repair groups compared with the plication group. In addition, all 3 repair techniques greatly ameliorated left ventricular ejection fraction (P < .05), and there was no significant difference in survival rate between groups (P = .25).Surgical ventricular restoration (linear repair, plication repair, and patch plasty) obtained equivalently appreciable outcomes for cardiac function improvement, perioperative mortality, and survival. Selection of a surgical technique for LVA patients should be optimized to individual patient conditions including the morphological characteristics of the aneurysm and ischemic scar.

Application of Circular Patch Plasty (Dor Procedure) or Linear Repair Techniques in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Aneurysms

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate early clinical outcomes and echocardiographic measurements of the left ventricle in patients who underwent left ventricular aneurysm repair using two different techniques associated to myocardial revascularization.

Methods

Eighty-nine patients (74 males, 15 females; mean age 58±8.4 years; range: 41 to 80 years) underwent post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm repair and myocardial revascularization performed between 1996 and 2016. Ventricular reconstruction was performed using endoventricular circular patch plasty (Dor procedure) (n=48; group A) or linear repair technique (n=41; group B).

Results

Multi-vessel disease in 55 (61.7%) and isolated left anterior descending (LAD) disease in 34 (38.2%) patients were identified. Five (5.6%) patients underwent aneurysmectomy alone, while the remaining 84 (94.3%) patients had aneurysmectomy with bypass. The mean number of grafts per patient was 2.1±1.2 with the Dor procedure and 2.9±1.3 with the linear repair technique. In-hospital mortality occurred in 4.1% and 7.3% in group A and group B, respectively (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The results of our study demonstrate that post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm repair can be performed with both techniques with acceptable surgical risk and with satisfactory hemodynamic improvement.

Percutaneous Ventricular Restoration with a Partitioning Device for Ischemic Heart Failure Treatment

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Percutaneous ventricular restoration with a ventricular partitioning device (VPD) is a novel minimally invasive procedure designed to restore the left ventricular (LV) shape by isolating the infarcted and aneurysmal LV apex from remainder of the cavity in heart failure patients with severely reduced LV ejection fraction. In this review, we perform an in-depth analysis of the design and purpose of the VPD and review the available clinical data, with special attention to hemodynamics, outcomes, and complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

PARACHUTE trials have shown >90% procedural success rate of VPD implant. Heart failure patients had improvement in hemodynamics (reduction in LV volumes and increase in LV ejection fraction) and functional status (6-min walking distance and quality of life scores) after the VPD implant. Optimal implant position is necessary to obtain a good clinical outcome. Percutaneous VPD implantation has thus far been a safe intervention capable of improving surrogate markers of heart failure but there is still a need to develop more durable devices with a long-lasting hemodynamics effect.