Mechanisms underlying increased mortality risk in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction randomly assigned to adaptive servoventilation in the SERVE-HF study: results of a secondary multistate modelling analysis

Australasian Sleep Association 2024 guidelines for sleep studies in adults

Executive summary: This document is a consensus statement of a subcommittee of experienced sleep physicians and scientists, tasked to review the literature and formulate recommendations on the indications, performance, and reporting of sleep studies, to update clinical practice from the 2017 Australasian Sleep Association (ASA) guidelines for sleep studies in adults (Douglas JA, Chai-Coetzer CL, McEvoy D, et al. Guidelines for sleep studies in adults - a position statement of the Australasian Sleep Association. Sleep Med. 2017;36(Suppl 1):S2-S22. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2017.03.019). This document moves the focus beyond important discussions outlined in the 2017 guidelines, particularly surrounding the sensitivity and specificity of validated questionnaires and home sleep studies. The 2024 guide outlines the performance of the broad range of sleep testing available for the investigations of sleep disorders in adults including indications, strengths, limitations, and reporting standards.

Central sleep apnea: emphasizing recognition and differentiation

INTRODUCTION

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a sleep-related breathing disorder in which the effort to breathe is intermittently diminished or absent. CSA is a common disorder among patients with different cardiovascular disorders, including heart failure. In addition, a growing number of medications have been shown to induce CSA and CSA can emerge after initiation of treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Accumulating evidence shows that CSA is a heterogeneous disorder with individual differences in clinical and biological characteristics and/or underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review offers an overview of the diagnostic aspects and classification of CSA, with an emphasis on heart failure patients, patients with CSA due to a medication and treatment-emergent CSA. The importance of evaluation of prognostic biomarkers in patients with different types of CSA is discussed. This narrative review synthesizes literature on CSA sourced from the PubMed database up to February 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

CSA presents a remarkably diverse disorder, with treatment modalities exhibiting potentially varied efficacy across its various phenotypes. This highlights the imperative for tailored management strategies that are rooted in phenotype classification.

Adaptive servo-ventilation for sleep-disordered breathing in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (ADVENT-HF): a multicentre, multinational, parallel-group, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, sleep-disordered breathing, comprising obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and central sleep apnoea (CSA), is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and sleep disruption. We hypothesised that treating sleep-disordered breathing with a peak-flow triggered adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) device would improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, multinational, parallel-group, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial of peak-flow triggered ASV in patients aged 18 years or older with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%) who were stabilised on optimal medical therapy with co-existing sleep-disordered breathing (apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI] ≥15 events/h of sleep), with concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessments. The trial was carried out at 49 hospitals in nine countries. Sleep-disordered breathing was stratified into predominantly OSA with an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 10 or lower or predominantly CSA. Participants were randomly assigned to standard optimal treatment alone or standard optimal treatment with the addition of ASV (1:1), stratified by study site and sleep apnoea type (ie, CSA or OSA), with permuted blocks of sizes 4 and 6 in random order. Clinical evaluations were performed and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and New York Heart Association class were assessed at months 1, 3, and 6 following randomisation and every 6 months thereafter to a maximum of 5 years. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of the composite of all-cause mortality, first admission to hospital for a cardiovascular reason, new onset atrial fibrillation or flutter, and delivery of an appropriate cardioverter-defibrillator shock. All-cause mortality was a secondary endpoint. Analysis for the primary outcome was done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01128816) and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN67500535), and the trial is complete.

FINDINGS

The first and last enrolments were Sept 22, 2010, and March 20, 2021. Enrolments terminated prematurely due to COVID-19-related restrictions. 1127 patients were screened, of whom 731 (65%) patients were randomly assigned to receive standard care (n=375; mean AHI 42·8 events per h of sleep [SD 20·9]) or standard care plus ASV (n=356; 43·3 events per h of sleep [20·5]). Follow-up of all patients ended at the latest on June 15, 2021, when the trial was terminated prematurely due to a recall of the ASV device due to potential disintegration of the motor sound-abatement material. Over the course of the trial, 41 (6%) of participants withdrew consent and 34 (5%) were lost to follow-up. In the ASV group, the mean AHI decreased to 2·8-3·7 events per h over the course of the trial, with associated improvements in sleep quality assessed 1 month following randomisation. Over a mean follow-up period of 3·6 years (SD 1·6), ASV had no effect on the primary composite outcome (180 events in the control group vs 166 in the ASV group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·95, 95% CI 0·77-1·18; p=0·67) or the secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality (88 deaths in the control group vs. 76 in the ASV group; 0·89, 0·66-1·21; p=0·47). For patients with OSA, the HR for all-cause mortality was 1·00 (0·68-1·46; p=0·98) and for CSA was 0·74 (0·44-1·23; p=0·25). No safety issue related to ASV use was identified.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and sleep-disordered breathing, ASV had no effect on the primary composite outcome or mortality but eliminated sleep-disordered breathing safely.

FUNDING

Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Philips RS North America.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach of central sleep apnea in heart failure - the role of adaptive servo-ventilation. A statement of the Portuguese society of pulmonology and the Portuguese sleep association

It is known that patients with heart failure (HF) have an increased risk of developing central sleep apnoea (CSA), with Cheyne-Stokes respiration. The development of servo-ventilation aimed to treat CSA and improve the quality of life (QoL) of these patients. A large randomized clinical study, SERVE-HF, was conducted in order to test this theory in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The results from this trial seemed to indicate that, in these patients, there was no beneficial effect of the assisted ventilation in CSA treatment. More surprisingly, an increased rate of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality was observed. This has led to dramatic changes in clinical practice, with decreased frequency of servo-ventilation prescription across Europe, including Portugal, due to changes in the guidelines. However, SERVE-HF was conducted only in severe systolic HF patients with CSA, and caution must be taken when extrapolating these results to HF patients with preserved ejection fraction or CSA patients without HF. The study also showed poor adherence, methodological and statistical gaps, including study design, patient selection, data collection and analysis, treatment adherence, and group crossovers, which have not been discussed in the trial as potential confounding factors and raise several concerns. Moreover, the adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) device used in SERVE-HF was unable to lower the minimum support pressure below 3 mm H₂0, and this has been suggested as one of the probable contributing reasons to the excess mortality observed in this study. This limitation has since been solved, and this ASV device is no longer used. This paper describes the results of a Portuguese Task Force on the treatment of central sleep apnoea in patients with chronic HF.

Effect of adaptive servo-ventilation for central sleep apnoea in systolic heart failure on muscle sympathetic nerve activity: a SERVE-HF randomised ancillary study

BACKGROUND

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) effectively suppresses central sleep apnoea (CSA) but has been associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in chronic heart failure patients with reduced ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). All-cause and, especially, cardiovascular mortality in chronic heart failure is highly correlated with sympathetic tone. This analysis of SERVE-HF data investigated the effect of ASV on sympathetic tone in patients with HFrEF and CSA.

METHODS

HFrEF patients in the SERVE-HF trial (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45%, apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥15 events·h^-1 with predominant CSA) were randomly assigned to receive guideline-based heart failure treatment alone (controls) or plus ASV. For this analysis, the primary outcome was change in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) at 3-month follow-up. The effects of baseline MSNA and change in MSNA over time on mortality in the main study were also assessed.

RESULTS

40 patients with HFrEF were included in this analysis (age 71.3±11.7 years, LVEF 34.2±7.7%, 57.5% in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II, 42.5% in NYHA Functional Class III, AHI 35.2±11 events·h^-1). Sympathetic tone evolution during follow-up did not differ between groups (controls: 47.6±8.3 bursts·min^-1 at baseline to 44.6±11.2 bursts·min^-1; ASV group: 43.0±9.0 bursts·min^-1 at baseline to 42.74±9.45 bursts·min^-1). The reduction in sympathetic tone was associated with significantly increased cardiovascular mortality in the ASV group, whereas in the control group reduced sympathetic tone appeared to be protective.

CONCLUSIONS

Suppression of CSA with ASV did not seem to have a significant effect on chronic heart failure-related sympathetic activation. Simultaneous suppression of CSA and reduction in MSNA was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality.

Effects of hyperventilation length on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in healthy humans simulating periodic breathing

Background: Periodic breathing (PB) is a cyclical breathing pattern composed of alternating periods of hyperventilation (hyperpnea, HP) and central apnea (CA). Differences in PB phenotypes mainly reside in HP length. Given that respiration modulates muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), which decreases during HP and increases during CA, the net effects of PB on MSNA may critically depend on HP length.

Objectives: We hypothesized that PB with shorter periods of HP is associated with increased MSNA and decreased heart rate variability.

Methods: 10 healthy participants underwent microelectrode recordings of MSNA from the common peroneal nerve along with non-invasive recording of HRV, blood pressure and respiration. Following a 10-min period of tidal breathing, participants were asked to simulate PB for 3 min following a computed respiratory waveform that emulated two PB patterns, comprising a constant CA of 20 s duration and HP of two different lengths: short (20 s) vs long (40 s). Results: Compared to (3 min of) normal breathing, simulated PB with short HP resulted in a marked increase in mean and maximum MSNA amplitude (from 3.2 ± 0.8 to 3.4 ± 0.8 µV, p = 0.04; from 3.8 ± 0.9 to 4.3 ± 1.1 µV, p = 0.04, respectively). This was paralleled by an increase in LF/HF ratio of heart rate variability (from 0.9 ± 0.5 to 2.0 ± 1.3; p = 0.04). In contrast, MSNA response to simulated PB with long HP did not change as compared to normal breathing. Single CA events consistently resulted in markedly increased MSNA (all p < 0.01) when compared to the preceding HPs, while periods of HP, regardless of duration, decreased MSNA (p < 0.05) when compared to normal breathing.

Conclusion: Overall, the net effects of PB in healthy subjects over time on MSNA are dependent on the relative duration of HP: increased sympathetic outflow is seen during PB with a short but not with a long period of HP.

[Is ASV therapy a positive airway pressure or ventilation therapy? A comparison of acid-base balance per day and under ASV]

The aim of this work was to determine whether therapy with adaptive support ventilation (ASV) leads to impairment of acid-base balance, in particular to hypocapnia and alkalosis. For this purpose, we measured the acid-base status (SBH) with carbon dioxide and oxygen partial pressure in arterialized blood (pCO₂ and pO₂), standard bicarbonate (SBC) and pH under spontaneous breathing during the day and under ASV at night. The trigger for this work was, among other things, the result of the SERVE-HF study, which found an increased risk of mortality in patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction <45% under ASV. There was a presumption of a device algorithm-based effect. The question was whether the minimum pressure support (PSmin) of 3 cmH₂O via respiratory alkalosis has a pro-arrhythmogenic effect (and causes higher mortality). A study of patients with treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) and normal cardiac function comparing 4 ASV devices showed significantly higher ventilation with the device used in the study. So, this excessive ventilation could be generated by the device and not by class.

METHODS

A total of 226 patients who came to the follow-up of the ASV from 10/2018 to 03/2020; age 65.2±11.3 years, BMI 35.7±7.5 kg/m², service life 5530±5400 h, 5.6±2.5 h/d, PSmin 4.9±1.8 cmH₂O. None of the patients had heart failure (EF>45%). The majority underwent ASV because of TECSA, rarely a cardiac or other genesis.

RESULTS

In 29 patients (12.8%) hypocapnia with pCO₂ <36 mmHg was found in the morning.

CONCLUSION

Under ASV we could not determine any class effect of hypocapnia. 12.8% had hypocapnia, and in half of the cases it was severe necessitating modification of therapy. This can have different causes but there are no clear criteria. As there is a risk of hyperventilation, acid-base balance under ASV should be checked.

Effects of Adaptive Servo-Ventilation on Nocturnal Ventricular Arrhythmia in Heart Failure Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Central Sleep Apnea–An Analysis From the SERVE-HF Major Substudy

Background

The SERVE-HF trial investigated the effect of treating central sleep apnoea (CSA) with adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Objective

The aim of the present ancillary analysis of the SERVE-HF major substudy (NCT01164592) was to assess the effects of ASV on the burden of nocturnal ventricular arrhythmias as one possible mechanism for sudden cardiac death in ASV-treated patients with HFrEF and CSA.

Methods

Three hundred twelve patients were randomized in the SERVE-HF major substudy [no treatment of CSA (control) vs. ASV]. Polysomnography including nocturnal ECG fulfilling technical requirements was performed at baseline, and at 3 and 12 months. Premature ventricular complexes (events/h of total recording time) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia were assessed. Linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models were used to analyse differences between the control and ASV groups, and changes over time.

Results

From baseline to 3- and 12-month follow-up, respectively, the number of premature ventricular complexes (control: median 19.7, 19.0 and 19.0; ASV: 29.1, 29.0 and 26.0 events/h; p = 0.800) and the occurrence of ≥1 non-sustained ventricular tachycardia/night (control: 18, 25, and 18% of patients; ASV: 24, 16, and 24% of patients; p = 0.095) were similar in the control and ASV groups.

Conclusion

Addition of ASV to guideline-based medical management had no significant effect on nocturnal ventricular ectopy or tachyarrhythmia over a period of 12 months in alive patients with HFrEF and CSA. Findings do not further support the hypothesis that ASV may lead to sudden cardiac death by triggering ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Treatment of Cheyne-Stokes Respiration in Heart Failure with Adaptive Servo-Ventilation: An Integrative Model

The SERVE-HF (Treatment of Predominant Central Sleep Apnea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients with Heart Failure) multicenter trial found a small but significant increase in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients assigned to adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) versus guideline-based medical treatment. To better understand the physiological underpinnings of this clinical outcome, we employ an integrative computer model to simulate congestive heart failure with Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CHF-CSR) in subjects with a broad spectrum of underlying pathogenetic mechanisms, as well as to determine the in silico changes in cardiopulmonary and autonomic physiology resulting from ASV. Our simulation results demonstrate that while the elimination of CSR through ASV can partially restore cardiorespiratory and autonomic physiology toward normality in the vast majority of CHF phenotypes, the degree of restoration can be highly variable, depending on the combination of CHF mechanisms in play. The group with the lowest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) appears to be most vulnerable to the potentially adverse effects of ASV, but the level of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) plays an important role in determining the nature of these effects.

[Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sleep-disordered breathing and hypoventilation-Influence on the cardiorenal system]

Comorbidities are frequently observed in patients suffering from pulmonary diseases due to shared risk factors and intricate interactions between various organ systems. This article aims to characterize the effects of selected diseases of the respiratory system on the cardiovascular system and kidneys. Advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often leads to a prognostically unfavorable increased pressure in the pulmonary circulation. In this respect treatment of these patients is primarily aimed at the underlying pulmonary disease and targeted treatment of the pulmonary hypertension should only be carried out according to invasive diagnostics and in an individualized manner. So far, the fact that there is a substantial overlap between COPD and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has been completely ignored, which should be considered in the diagnostic procedure. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has several unfavorable effects on the cardiovascular system and has been identified as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The established treatment of OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been shown to improve daytime sleepiness and the quality of life; however, an effect of CPAP on the occurrence of cardiovascular events, especially in asymptomatic patients, has so far not been demonstrated in randomized trials. Peripheral edema is frequently observed in patients suffering from chronic hypercapnia, which can be explained by several pathophysiological mechanisms, including pulmonary vasoconstriction and a direct effect of the hypercapnia on renal blood flow. Apart from the administration of diuretics, recompensation of such patients always requires treatment of the hypercapnia by noninvasive ventilation.

Positionspapier „Schlafmedizin in der Kardiologie“, Update 2021

Es hat sich viel getan in der Welt der Schlafmedizin in der Kardiologie, weshalb eine vollwertige Überarbeitung des Positionspapiers „Schlafmedizin in der Kardiologie“ erforderlich wurde. In der aktuellen neuartigen Version finden sich nicht nur alle verfügbaren Studien, Literaturstellen und Updates zu Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik- und Therapieempfehlungen, sondern auch Ausblicke auf neue Entwicklungen und zukünftige Forschungserkenntnisse. Dieses überarbeitete Positionspapier gibt Empfehlungen für Diagnostik und Therapie von Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen mit schlafassoziierten Atmungsstörungen und erteilt darüber hinaus einen fundierten Überblick über verfügbare Therapien und Evidenzen, gibt aber ebenso Ratschläge wie mit Komorbiditäten umzugehen ist. Insbesondere enthält dieses überarbeitete Positionspapier aktualisierte Stellungnahmen zu schlafassoziierten Atmungsstörungen bei Patienten mit koronarer Herzerkrankung, Herzinsuffizienz, arterieller Hypertonie, aber auch für Patienten mit Vorhofflimmern. Darüber hinaus finden sich erstmals Empfehlungen zur Telemedizin als eigenes, neues Kapitel. Dieses Positionspapier bietet Kardiologen sowie Ärzten in der Behandlung von kardiovaskulären Patienten die Möglichkeit einer evidenzbasierten Behandlung der wachsend bedeutsamen und mit zunehmender Aufmerksamkeit behafteten Komorbidität schlafassoziierter Atmungsstörungen. Und nicht zuletzt besteht mit diesem neuen Positionspapier eine enge Verknüpfung mit dem neuen Curriculum Schlafmedizin der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, weshalb dieses Positionspapier eine Orientierung für die erworbenen Fähigkeiten des Curriculums im Umgang von kardiovaskulären Patienten mit schlafassoziierten Atmungsstörungen darstellt.

Ventricular arrhythmia in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction and central sleep apnoea

Cheyne–Stokes respiration (CSR) may trigger ventricular arrhythmia in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and central sleep apnoea (CSA). This study determined the prevalence and predictors of a high nocturnal ventricular arrhythmia burden in patients with HFrEF and CSA (with and without CSR) and to evaluate the temporal association between CSR and the ventricular arrhythmia burden.

 This cross-sectional ancillary analysis included 239 participants from the SERVE-HF major sub-study who had HFrEF and CSA, and nocturnal ECG from polysomnography. CSR was stratified in ≥20% and <20% of total recording time (TRT). High burden of ventricular arrhythmia was defined as >30 premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) per hour of TRT. A sub-analysis was performed to evaluate the temporal association between CSR and ventricular arrhythmias in sleep stage N2.

 High ventricular arrhythmia burden was observed in 44% of patients. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, male sex, lower systolic blood pressure, non-use of antiarrhythmic medication and CSR ≥20% were significantly associated with PVCs >30·h⁻¹ (OR 5.49, 95% CI 1.51–19.91, p=0.010; OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–1.00, p=0.017; OR 5.02, 95% CI 1.51–19.91, p=0.001; and OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.22–4.05, p=0.009; respectively). PVCs occurred more frequently during sleep phases with versus without CSR (median (interquartile range): 64.6 (24.8–145.7) versus 34.6 (4.8–75.2)·h⁻¹ N2 sleep; p=0.006).

 Further mechanistic studies and arrhythmia analysis of major randomised trials evaluating the effect of treating CSR on ventricular arrhythmia burden and arrhythmia-related outcomes are warranted to understand how these data match with the results of the parent SERVE-HF study.

High ventricular arrhythmia burden occurs in 44% of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction and central sleep apnoea. Arrhythmia burden is higher in sleep phases with versus without Cheyne–Stokes respiration.https://bit.ly/2QBDamC

Sleep Disordered Breathing and Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Sleep disordered breathing causes repetitive episodes of nocturnal hypoxemia, sympathetic nervous activation, and cortical arousal, often associated with excessive daytime sleepiness. Sleep disordered breathing is common in people with, or at risk of, cardiovascular (CV) disease including those who are obese or have hypertension, coronary disease, heart failure, or atrial fibrillation. Current therapy of obstructive sleep apnea includes weight loss (if obese), exercise, and positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. This improves daytime sleepiness. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with increased CV risk, but treatment with PAP in randomized trials has not been shown to improve CV outcome. Central sleep apnea (CSA) is not usually associated with daytime sleepiness in heart failure or atrial fibrillation and is a marker of increased CV risk, but PAP has been shown to be harmful in 1 randomized trial. The benefits of better phenotyping, targeting of higher-risk patients, and a more personalized approach to therapy are being explored in ongoing trials.

Adaptive servo ventilation for sleep apnoea in heart failure: the FACE study 3-month data

Rationale

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) is contraindicated in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) who have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 45% and predominant central sleep apnoea (CSA). However, the effects of ASV in other HF subgroups have not been clearly defined.

Objective

The European, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort trial, FACE, evaluated the effects of ASV therapy on morbidity and mortality in patients with HF with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB); 3-month outcomes in patient subgroups defined using latent class analysis (LCA) are presented.

Methods

Consecutive patients with HF with predominant CSA (±obstructive sleep apnoea) indicated for ASV were included from 2009 to 2018; the non-ASV group included patients who refused/were noncompliant with ASV. The primary endpoint was time to composite first event (all-cause death, lifesaving cardiovascular intervention or unplanned hospitalisation for worsening of chronic HF).

Measurements and main results

Baseline assessments were performed in 503 patients, and 482 underwent 3-month follow-up. LCA identified six discrete patient clusters characterised by variations in LVEF, SDB type, age, comorbidities and ASV acceptance. The 3- month rate of primary outcome events was significantly higher in cluster 1 patients (predominantly men, low LVEF, severe HF, CSA; 13.9% vs 1.5%–5% in other clusters, p<0.01).

Conclusion

For the first time, our data identified homogeneous patient clusters representing clinically relevant subgroups relating to SDB management in patients with HF with different ASV usage, each with a different prognosis. This may improve patient phenotyping in clinical practice and allow individualisation of therapy.

Sacubitril-valsartan initiation in chronic heart failure patients impacts sleep apnea: the ENTRESTO-SAS study

Aims

Optimizing medical cardiac treatment for sleep apnoea (SA) in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is an expert Grade C recommendation based on six studies encompassing a total of 67 patients only. Whether sacubitril–valsartan (SV), a cornerstone of HFrEF medical treatment, impacts SA is unknown and requires evaluation.

Methods and results

The ENTRESTO‐SAS trial is a six‐centre, prospective, open‐label real‐life cohort study (NCT02916160). Ambulatory patients eligible for SV (i.e. HFrEF adults who remain symptomatic despite optimal treatment) were evaluated before and after 3 months of SV (including nocturnal ventilatory polygraphy); 118 patients were final analysed [median age was 66 (IQ_25–75: 56–73) years, 81.4% male, 36.5% New York Heart Association III–IV, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide level of 1564 (701–3376) ng/L, left ventricular ejection fraction of 30 (25–34)%, 60.7% ischaemic HFrEF, 97.5% initially treated with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, 83.9% with beta‐blockers, 64.4% with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and 74.6% with diuretics]. Three groups were defined according to initial central/obstructive apnoea–hypopnoea indices (AHIs): G1 (n = 49, AHI_central ≥ 5/h and AHI_obstructive < 15/h); G2 (n = 27, AHI_obstructive ≥ 15/h); and G3 (n = 42, AHI_central < 5/h and AHI_obstructive < 15/h). At 3 months, the AHI (main predefined outcome) decreased significantly by −7.10/h (IQ_25–75: −16.10 to 0.40; P < 0.001) in G1 + G2 without positive airway pressure treatment (45 patients, median initial AHI of 24.20 (IQ_25–75: 16.40–43.50)/h). Of these, 24.4% presented an AHI decrease ≥50% and 37.78% had a final AHI < 15/h (tendency for improvement from an initial value of 20%: P = 0.0574). For G1 patients (n = 37), AHI significantly decreased from a median of 22.90 (16.00–43.50)/h to 19.20 (12.70–31.10)/h (P = 0.002). For G2 patients (n = 8), AHI decreased from a median of 30.10 (26.40–47.60)/h to 22.75 (14.60–36.90)/h (statistically non‐significant, P = 0.059).

Conclusions

In this real‐life population, SV treatment for 3 months in SA patients is associated with a significant decrease in AHI. These results support the current guidelines that recommend first an optimization of the HFrEF treatment in patients with HFrEF and central SA. A potential positive airway pressure sparing effect merits further investigation.

Research Priorities for Patients with Heart Failure and Central Sleep Apnea. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Background: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is common among patients with heart failure and has been strongly linked to adverse outcomes. However, progress toward improving outcomes for such patients has been limited. The purpose of this official statement from the American Thoracic Society is to identify key areas to prioritize for future research regarding CSA in heart failure.

Methods: An international multidisciplinary group with expertise in sleep medicine, pulmonary medicine, heart failure, clinical research, and health outcomes was convened. The group met at the American Thoracic Society 2019 International Conference to determine research priority areas. A statement summarizing the findings of the group was subsequently authored using input from all members.

Results: The workgroup identified 11 specific research priorities in several key areas: 1) control of breathing and pathophysiology leading to CSA, 2) variability across individuals and over time, 3) techniques to examine CSA pathogenesis and outcomes, 4) impact of device and pharmacological treatment, and 5) implementing CSA treatment for all individuals

Conclusions: Advancing care for patients with CSA in the context of heart failure will require progress in the arenas of translational (basic through clinical), epidemiological, and patient-centered outcome research. Given the increasing prevalence of heart failure and its associated substantial burden to individuals, society, and the healthcare system, targeted research to improve knowledge of CSA pathogenesis and treatment is a priority.

Biomarkers in patients with heart failure and central sleep apnoea: findings from the SERVE-HF trial

Aims

The Treatment of Sleep‐Disordered Breathing with Predominant Central Sleep Apnoea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients with Heart Failure trial investigated the effects of adaptive servo‐ventilation (ASV) (vs. control) on outcomes of 1325 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and central sleep apnoea (CSA). The primary outcome (a composite of all‐cause death or unplanned HF hospitalization) did not differ between the two groups. However, all‐cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality were higher in the ASV group. Circulating biomarkers may help in better ascertain patients' risk, and this is the first study applying a large set of circulating biomarkers in patients with both HFrEF and CSA.

Methods and results

Circulating protein‐biomarkers (n = 276) ontologically involved in CV pathways, were studied in 749 (57% of the trial population) patients (biomarker substudy), to investigate their association with the study outcomes (primary outcome, CV death and all‐cause death). The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and > 90% were male. The groups (ASV vs. control and biomarker substudy vs. no biomarker) were well balanced. The “best” clinical prognostic model included male sex, systolic blood pressure < 120 mmHg, diabetes, loop diuretic, cardiac device, 6‐min walking test distance, and N‐terminal pro BNP as the strongest prognosticators. On top of the “best” clinical prognostic model, the biomarkers that significantly improved both the discrimination (c‐index) and the net reclassification index (NRI) of the model were soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 for the primary outcome; neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 3 (Notch‐3) for CV‐death and all‐cause death; and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF‐15) for all‐cause death only.

Conclusions

We studied 276 circulating biomarkers in patients with HFrEF and central sleep apnoea; of these biomarkers, three added significant prognostic information on top of the best clinical model: soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (primary outcome), Notch‐3 (CV and all‐cause death), and GDF‐15 (all‐cause death).

Effect of Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea/Cheyne-Stokes Respiration on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Patients who have experienced heart failure with central sleep apnea/Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSA/CSR) have an impaired prognosis. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and adaptive servoventilation (ASV) as well as nocturnal oxygen (O₂) are proposed treatment modalities of CSA/CSR. The goal of the study is to assess whether and how different treatments of CSA/CSR affect cardiac function.

METHODS

Databases were searched up to December 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of any combination of CPAP, ASV, O₂ or an inactive control on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure and CSA/CSR. A systematic review and network meta-analysis using multivariate random-effects meta-regression were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four RCTs (1,289 patients) were included in the systematic review and data of 16 RCTs (951 patients; apnea-hypopnea-index 38 ± 3/h, LVEF 29 ± 3%) could be pooled in a network meta-analysis. Compared to an inactive control, both CPAP and ASV significantly improved LVEF by 4.4% (95% confidence interval 0.3-8.5%, P = 0.036) and 3.8% (95% confidence interval 0.6-7.0%, P = 0.025), respectively, whereas O₂ had no effect on LVEF (P = 0.35). There was no difference in treatment effects on LVEF between CPAP and ASV (P = 0.76). The treatment effect of positive pressure ventilation was larger when baseline LVEF was lower in systolic heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

CPAP and ASV are effective in improving LVEF in patients with heart failure and CSA/CSR to a clinically relevant amount, whereas nocturnal O₂ is not. There is no difference between CPAP and ASV in the comparative beneficial effect on cardiac function.

Bioprofiles and mechanistic pathways associated with Cheyne-Stokes respiration: insights from the SERVE-HF trial

INTRODUCTION

The SERVE-HF trial included patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with sleep-disordered breathing, randomly assigned to treatment with Adaptive-Servo Ventilation (ASV) or control. The primary outcome was the first event of death from any cause, lifesaving cardiovascular intervention, or unplanned hospitalization for worsening heart failure. A subgroup analysis of the SERVE-HF trial suggested that patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) < 20% (low CSR) experienced a beneficial effect from ASV, whereas in patients with CSR ≥ 20% ASV might have been harmful. Identifying the proteomic signatures and the underlying mechanistic pathways expressed in patients with CSR could help generating hypothesis for future research.

METHODS

Using a large set of circulating protein-biomarkers (n = 276, available in 749 patients; 57% of the SERVE-HF population) we sought to investigate the proteins associated with CSR and to study the underlying mechanisms that these circulating proteins might represent.

RESULTS

The mean age was 69 ± 10 years and > 90% were male. Patients with CSR < 20% (n = 139) had less apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) events per hour and less oxygen desaturation. Patients with CSR < 20% might have experienced a beneficial effect of ASV treatment (primary outcome HR [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.34-0.88]; p = 0.012), whereas those with CSR ≥ 20% might have experienced a detrimental effect of ASV treatment (primary outcome HR [95% CI] = 1.39 [1.09-1.76]; p = 0.008); p for interaction = 0.001. Of the 276 studied biomarkers, 8 were associated with CSR (after adjustment and with a FDR1%-corrected p value). For example, higher PAR-1 and ITGB2 levels were associated with higher odds of having CSR < 20%, whereas higher LOX-1 levels were associated with higher odds of CSR ≥ 20%. Signalling, metabolic, haemostatic and immunologic pathways underlie the expression of these biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

We identified proteomic signatures that may represent underlying mechanistic pathways associated with patterns of CSR in HFrEF. These hypothesis-generating findings require further investigation towards better understanding of CSR in HFrEF.

SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS

PAR-1 proteinase-activated receptor 1, ADM adrenomedullin, HSP-27 heat shock protein-27, ITGB2 integrin beta 2, GLO1 glyoxalase 1, ENRAGE/S100A12 S100 calcium-binding protein A12, LOX-1 lectin-like LDL receptor 1, ADAM-TS13 disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member13 also known as von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease.

Therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current status, unique challenges, and future directions

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common form of HF. Among elderly women, HFpEF comprises more than 80% of incident HF cases. Adverse outcomes-exercise intolerance, poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations, and reduced survival-approach those of classic HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). However, despite its importance, our understanding of the pathophysiology of HFpEF is incomplete, and despite intensive efforts, optimal therapy remains uncertain, as most trials to date have been negative. This is in stark contrast to management of HFrEF, where dozens of positive trials have established a broad array of effective, guidelines-based therapies that definitively improve a range of clinically meaningful outcomes. In addition to providing an overview of current management status, we examine evolving data that may help explain this paradox, overcome past challenges, provide a roadmap for future success, and that underpin a wave of new trials that will test novel approaches based on these insights.

Central sleep apnoea and periodic breathing in heart failure: prognostic significance and treatment options

Central sleep apnoea (CSA) including periodic breathing is prevalent in more than one-third of patients with heart failure and is highly and independently associated with poor outcomes. Optimal treatment is still debated and well-conducted studies regarding efficacy and impact on outcomes of available treatment options are limited, particularly in cardiac failure with preserved ejection fraction. While continuous positive airway pressure and oxygen reduce breathing disturbances by 50%, adaptive servoventilation (ASV) normalises breathing disturbances by to controlling the underlying mechanism of CSA. Results are contradictory regarding impact of ASV on hard outcomes. Cohorts and registry studies show survival improvement under ASV, while secondary analyses of the large SERVE-HF randomised trial showed an excess mortality in cardiac failure with reduced ejection fraction. The current priority is to understand which phenotypes of cardiac failure patients may benefit from treatment guiding individualised and personalised management.

Estimation of adaptive ventilation success and failure using polysomnogram and outpatient therapy biomarkers

Study Objectives

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) devices provide anticyclic pressure support for the treatment of central and/or complex sleep apnea, including heart failure patients. Variability in responses in the clinic and negative clinical trials motivated assessment of standard and novel signal biomarkers for ASV efficacy.

Methods

Multiple clinical databases were queried to assess potential signal biomarkers of ASV effectiveness, including the following: (1) attended laboratory adaptive ventilation titrations: 108, of which 66 had mainstream ETCO2 measurements; (2) AirView data in 98 participants, (3) complete data, from diagnostic polysomnogram (PSG) through review and prospective analysis of on-therapy data using SleepyHead freeware in 44 participants; and (4) hemodynamic data in the form of beat-to-beat blood pressure during ASV titration, using a Finometer in five participants.

Results

Signal biomarkers of reduced ASV efficacy were noted as follows: (1) an arousal index which markedly exceeded the respiratory event index during positive pressure titration; (2) persistent pressure cycling during long-term ASV therapy, visible in online review systems or reviewing data using freeware; (3) the ASV-associated pressure cycling induced arousals, sleep fragmentation, and blood pressure surges; and (4) elevated ratios of 95th percentile to median tidal volume, minute ventilation, and respiratory rate were associated with pressure cycling. High intraclass coefficients (>0.8) for machine apnea-hypopnea index and other extractable metrics were consistent with stability of patterns over multiple nights of use. Global clinical outcomes correlated negatively with pressure cycling.

Conclusions

Potential polysomnographic- and device-related signal biomarkers of ASV efficacy are described and may allow improved estimation of therapeutic effectiveness of adaptive ventilation.

Sleep Apnea and Cardiovascular Disease: An Enigmatic Risk Factor

Synchronization of molecular, metabolic, and cardiovascular circadian oscillations is fundamental to human health. Sleep-disordered breathing, which disrupts such temporal congruence, elicits hemodynamic, autonomic, chemical, and inflammatory disturbances with acute and long-term consequences for heart, brain, and circulatory and metabolic function. Sleep apnea afflicts a substantial proportion of adult men and women but is more prevalent in those with established cardiovascular diseases and especially fluid-retaining states. Despite the experimental, epidemiological, observational, and interventional evidence assembled in support of these concepts, this substantial body of work has had relatively modest pragmatic impact, thus far, on the discipline of cardiology. Contemporary estimates of cardiovascular risk still are derived typically from data acquired during wakefulness. The impact of sleep-related breathing disorders rarely is entered into such calculations or integrated into diagnostic disease-specific algorithms or therapeutic recommendations. Reasons for this include absence of apnea-related symptoms in most with cardiovascular disease, impediments to efficient diagnosis at the population level, debate as to target, suboptimal therapies, difficulties mounting large randomized trials of sleep-specific interventions, and the challenging results of those few prospective cardiovascular outcome trials that have been completed and reported. The objectives of this review are to delineate the bidirectional interrelationship between sleep-disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease, consider the findings and implications of observational and randomized trials of treatment, frame the current state of clinical equipoise, identify principal current controversies and potential paths to their resolution, and anticipate future directions.

Unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation in the therapeutical algorithm of central sleep apnoea in heart failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Central sleep apnoea (CSA) is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure and substantially impairs survival. If optimal cardiac treatment fails, alternative therapeutical options, including positive airway pressure (PAP) therapies, drugs or application of oxygen and carbon dioxide are considered to suppress CSA which interfere with the complex underlying pathophysiology. Most recently, unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) has been studied in these patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need to critically evaluate efficacy, potential harm and positioning of PNS in current treatment algorithms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from case series and limited randomized controlled trials demonstrate the feasibility of the invasive approach and acceptable peri-interventional adverse events. PNS reduces CSA by 50%, a figure comparable with continuous PAP or oxygen. However, PNS cannot improve any comorbid upper airways obstruction. A number of fatalities due to malignant cardiac arrhythmias or other cardiac events have been reported, although the association with the therapy is unclear.

SUMMARY

PNS offers an additional option to the therapeutical portfolio. Intervention-related adverse events and noninvasive alternatives need clear discussion with the patient. The excess mortality in the SERVE-HF study has mainly been attributed to sudden cardiac death. Therefore, previous cardiac fatalities under PNS urge close observation in future studies as long-term data are missing.

Novel approaches to the management of chronic systolic heart failure: future directions and unanswered questions

Despite improvements in outcomes in the last few decades for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), there still remains a need for novel therapies as many patients incompletely recover with existing therapies and progress to advanced HF. In this review, we will discuss recent advances in the management of HFrEF with a focus on upcoming therapies that hold the greatest promise for clinical use. We will discuss novel pharmacological therapies and areas of uncertainty with existing therapies. We will also discuss the potential utility and controversy surrounding novel interventions for HF such as percutaneous mitral valve repair, atrial fibrillation ablation, and other emerging interventions with positive signals for benefit in HFrEF. Finally, we will summarize the current state of stem cell and gene therapy for HFrEF and future directions.

Collapse

Diagnosis and management of central sleep apnea syndrome

Introduction: Central sleep apnea (CSA) syndrome has gained a considerable interest in the sleep field within the last 10 years. It is overrepresented in particular subpopulations such as patients with stroke or heart failure. Early detection and diagnosis, as well as appropriate treatment of central breathing disturbances during sleep remain challenging. Areas covered: Based on a systematic review of CSA in adults the clinical evidence and polysomnographic patterns useful for discerning central from obstructive events are discussed. Current therapeutic indications of CSA and perspectives are presented, according to the type of respiratory disturbances during sleep, alterations in blood gases and ventilatory control. Expert opinion: The precise identification of central events during polysomnographic recording is mandatory. Therapeutic choices for CSA depend on the typology of respiratory disturbances observed by polysomnography, changes in blood gases and ventilatory control. In CSA with normocapnia and ventilatory instability, adaptive servo-ventilation is recommended. In CSA with hypercapnia and/or rapid-eye movement sleep hypoventilation, non-invasive ventilation is required. Further studies are required as strong evidence is lacking regarding the long-term consequences of CSA and the long-term impact of current treatment strategies.

Death in patients with adaptive servo-ventilation for sleep apnea and no specific SERVE-HF profile: A case series study

Purpose

The SERVE-HF study reported a risk of cardiovascular death associated with adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) for central sleep apnea in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Therefore, we adopted in May 2015 a safety procedure in our 32 patients with ASV since 2006. It led to ASV removal in four patients due to ≤45% LVEF. At the end of the procedure we noted eight cases of death. This high 25% mortality rate led us to study these cases.

Methods

The study population was derived from our database of patient follow-up from the sleep unit of our cardiovascular department.

Results

All deceased patients but one had cardiac disorders but only one matched the SERVE-HF patient profile. ASV was due to predominant central (n = 4) or mixed (n = 4) sleep apnea. Six patients died prior to our procedure including two patients who died several months after ASV cessation, one from ventricular fibrillation and one from respiratory infection. The cases with ongoing ASV consisted in one case of end-stage heart failure with asystole, two cases of cancer and one case of suicide. Two patients died after their safety procedure with no contra-indications to ASV and before study completion in all the patients, one from cancer and one from pulmonary and renal disorders.

Conclusions

In this series, no relationship became apparent between sleep apnea or ASV and death. Cardiovascular deaths were not predominant. Further study will be required to clarify the risks associated with ASV in patients with cardiovascular disease.

[Transvenous neurostimulation in central sleep apnea associated with heart failure]

Sleep-related breathing disorders can be classified as either obstructive (OSA) or central sleep apnea (CSA). Whereas there is substantial knowledge about the pathophysiology and sound recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of OSA, the origin of CSA is still incompletely understood, patient identification is difficult and the necessity for specific treatment is under debate. CSA often accompanies heart failure and is associated with an adverse prognosis. Optimized heart failure treatment reduces CSA and is thus the cornerstone of CSA treatment. In contrast to OSA, noninvasive ventilation does not lead to prognostic improvement in CSA and ASV ventilation may even lead to an increase in mortality. Transvenous neurostimuation of the phrenic nerve is currently under clinical investigation as a new therapeutic modality for CSA. Early results demonstrate positive effects on sleep parameters and quality of life without any evidence for a negative impact on mortality. However, these results await confirmation in larger studies before this new approach can be advocated for routine clinical use.

Phrenic nerve stimulation to treat patients with central sleep apnoea and heart failure

AIMS

The presence of central sleep apnoea (CSA) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate if using phrenic nerve stimulation to treat CSA in patients with CSA and HF was associated with changes in HF-specific metrics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients randomized in the remedē System Pivotal Trial and identified at baseline with HF were included (n = 96). Effectiveness data from treatment and former control groups were pooled based on months since therapy activation. Changes from baseline to 6 and 12 months in sleep metrics, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, patient global assessment health-related quality of life, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), and echocardiographic parameters are reported. HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death within 6 months are reported by the original randomized group assignment for safety assessment. Sleep metrics and quality of life improved from baseline to 6 and 12 months. At 12 months, MLHFQ scores changed by -6.8 ± 20.0 (P = 0.005). The 6-month rate of HF hospitalization was 4.7% in treatment patients (standard error = 3.3) and 17.0% in control patients (standard error = 5.5) (P = 0.065). Reported adverse events were as expected for a transvenous implantable system.

CONCLUSIONS

Phrenic nerve stimulation reduces CSA severity in patients with HF. In parallel, this CSA treatment was associated with benefits on HF quality of life.

Identification and Treatment of Central Sleep Apnoea: Beyond SERVE-HF

Central sleep apnoea (CSA) occurs in a large proportion of HF patients. CSA has clear detrimental effects, resulting in intermittent hypoxia and sympathetic activation, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment options are limited following the results of a recent trial in which adaptive servo-ventilation resulted in an increase in cardiovascular mortality. Ongoing studies utilising other forms of positive airway pressure may provide additional insight into the results of this trial. A new neurostimulation therapy, phrenic nerve stimulation, has offered a new physiological approach to the treatment of CSA. This therapy has resulted in improvements in the severity of disease and quality of life.

Characteristics and circadian distribution of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with heart failure and sleep-disordered breathing

BACKGROUND

Cardiac arrhythmias and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) are common comorbidities in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, understanding of the association between arrhythmias and SDB is poor. This study assessed the occurrence and circadian distribution of ventricular arrhythmias in HFrEF patients with and without SDB.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included HFrEF patients admitted for unattended overnight cardiorespiratory polygraphy and 24-h Holter-ECG recording. Holter-ECG data (events/h) were categorized by time of day: morning, 06:00-13:59; afternoon, 14:00-21:59; nighttime, 22:00-05:59. Respiratory events were expressed using the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and an AHI ≥ 15/h was categorized as moderate to severe SDB.

RESULTS

167 patients were included (82% male, age 65 ± 10.4 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 30.9 ± 7.9%); SDB was predominantly central sleep apnea (CSA) in 45.5%, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in 23.9% or none/mild (nmSDB) in 17.4%. Morning premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) were detected significantly more frequently in CSA versus nmSDB patients (44.4/h versus 1.8/h; p = 0.02). Non-sustained VT was more frequent in patients with CSA versus versus OSA or nmSDB (17.9 versus 3.2 or 3.2%/h; p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). There was no significant variation in VT occurrence by time of day in HFrEF patients with CSA (p = 0.3). CSA was an independent predictor of VT occurrence in HFrEF in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.5-11.4, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

CSA was associated with VT occurrence irrespective of sleep/wake status in HFrEF patients, and independently predicted the occurrence of VT. This association may contribute to chances by which CSA increases sudden death risk in HFrEF patients.

Adaptive servo-ventilation to treat central sleep apnea in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the Bad Oeynhausen prospective ASV registry

BACKGROUND

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is highly prevalent in heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HF-REF). The Bad Oeynhausen Adaptive Servo-ventilation (ASV) registry (NCT01657188) was designed to investigate whether treatment of CSA with ASV improved survival in HF-REF patients; the effects of ASV on symptoms and cardiopulmonary performance were also investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From January 2004 to October 2013, the registry prospectively enrolled HF-REF patients [NYHA class ≥ II, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45%] with moderate to severe predominant CSA [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h]. ASV-treated patients were followed up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, including natriuretic peptide concentrations, blood gas analyses, echocardiography, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) testing. 550 patients were included [age 67.7 ± 10 years, 90% male, 52% in NYHA class ≥ III, LVEF 29.9 ± 8%, AHI 35.4 ± 13.6/h, and time with nocturnal oxygen saturation < 90% (T < 90%) 58 ± 73 min]; ASV was prescribed to 224 patients. Over a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 109 (48.7%) ASV-treated patients and 191 (58.6%) controls died (adjusted Cox modelling hazard ratio of 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.24; p = 0.740); older age, lower LVEF, impaired renal function, low sodium concentration, and nocturnal hypoxemia were significant predictors of mortality. Patient reported NYHA functional class improved in the ASV group, but LVEF, CPX, 6MWD, natriuretic peptides and blood gases remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term ASV treatment of predominant CSA in HF-REF patients included in our registry had no statistically significant effect on survival. ASV improved HF symptoms, but had no significant effects on exercise capacity, LVEF, natriuretic peptide concentrations or blood gases during follow-up as compared to control patients.

Management of Sleep Disordered Breathing in Patients with Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper reviews treatment options for sleep disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with heart failure. We sought to identify therapies for SDB with the best evidence for long-term use in patients with heart failure and to minimize uncertainties in clinical practice by examining frequently discussed questions: what is the role of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with heart failure? Is adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) safe in patients with heart failure? To what extent is SDB a modifiable risk factor?

RECENT FINDINGS

Consistent evidence has demonstrated that the development of SDB in patients with heart failure is a poor prognostic indicator and a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. However, despite numerous available interventions for obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea, it remains unclear what effect these therapies have on patients with heart failure. To date, all major randomized clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit with SDB therapy and one major study investigating the use of adaptive servo-ventilation demonstrated harm. Significant questions persist regarding the management of SDB in patients with heart failure. Until appropriately powered trials identify a treatment modality that increases cardiovascular survival in patients with SDB and heart failure, a patient's heart failure management should remain the priority of medical care.

The acute effect of continuous positive airway pressure titration on blood pressure in awake overweight/obese patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

OBJECTIVES

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improves upper airway obstruction in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), who often are overweight-obese. Although it is thought that CPAP improves long-term blood pressure control (BP), the impact of acute and short-term CPAP use on the cardiovascular system in obese patients has not been described in detail.

METHODS

Obese patients (body mass index, BMI > 25 kg/m²) with OSA were studied awake, supine during incremental CPAP titration (4-20 cmH₂O, +2 cmH₂O/3 mins). BP was measured continuously with a beat-to-beat BP monitor (Ohmeda 2300, Finapres Medical Systems, Amsterdam/NL), BP variability (BPV) was calculated as the standard deviation of BP at each CPAP level, the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated and changes in BP and BPV were reported.

RESULTS

15 patients (12 male, 48 ± 10) years, BMI 38.9 ± 5.8 kg/m²) were studied; the baseline BP was 131.0 ± 10.2/85.1 ± 9.1 mmHg. BP and BPV increased linearly with CPAP titration (systolic BP r = 0.960, p < .001; diastolic BP r = 0.961, p < .001; systolic BPV r = 0.662, p = .026; diastolic BPV r = 0.886, p < .001). The systolic BP increased by +17% (+23.15 (7.9, 38.4) mmHg; p = .011) and the diastolic BP by +23% (+18.27 (2.33, 34.21) mmHg; p = .009), when titrating CPAP to 20 cmH₂O. Systolic BPV increased by +96% (+5.10 (0.67, 9.53) mmHg; p < .001) and was maximal at 14 cmH₂O, and diastolic BPV by +97% (+3.02 (0.26, 5.78) mmHg; p < .001) at 16 cmH₂O.

CONCLUSION

Short-term incremental CPAP leads to significant increases in BP and BPV in obese patients with OSA while awake. Careful titration of pressures is required to minimise the risk of nocturnal awakenings while improving BP control.