Furmonertinib (AST2818) versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (FURLONG): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 study

Furmonertinib and intrathecal pemetrexed chemotherapy rechallenges osimertinib-refractory leptomeningeal metastasis in a non-small cell lung cancer patient harboring EGFR20 R776S, C797S, and EGFR21 L858R compound EGFR mutations: a case report

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are considered the first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. However, due to the rarity of cases, the response of EGFR-TKIs in patients harboring uncommon compound EGFR mutations still needs to be determined. Here, we demonstrated the case of a 47-year-old smoker diagnosed with leptomeningeal metastasis from NSCLC and had EGFR20 R776S, C797S, and EGFR21 L858R compound mutations. He was treated with furmonertinib combined with intrathecal pemetrexed chemotherapy following progression on osimertinib, which led to clinical improvement and successfully prolonged his survival by 3 months. Regrettably, the patient eventually died from heart disease. This report provides the first reported evidence for the use of furmonertinib and intrathecal pemetrexed chemotherapy in NSCLC patients harboring EGFR R776S/C797S/L858R mutations who progressed on previous EGFR-TKIs.

T790M mutation sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells to radiation via suppressing SPOCK1

Background

Approximately 50% of patients harbor the T790M mutation after developing first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) resistance. Evidence has showed the major treatment failure is local relapses and limited metastases. Several studies have demonstrated the value of radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the EGFR T790M mutation after the development of TKI resistance. The aim of this study was to explore the role of radiation in T790M-mutant NSCLC and the value of early radiotherapy for NSCLC with T790M-mediated EGFR-TKI resistance.

Methods

Gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cell lines were established via stepwise exposure to increasing concentrations of gefitinib (PC-9-GR). Droplet digital PCR was used to determine the relative T790M subclone abundance. In vitro and in vivo models were established using different mixtures of PC-9-GR and PC-9 cells. Differentially expressed genes were identified using RNA sequencing. Two research models were constructed (salvage and prophylactic radiotherapy) to determine the effects of early radiotherapy on gefitinib-resistant cells.

Results

PC-9-GR cells exhibited higher radiosensitivity than PC-9 cells (sensitivity enhancement ratio = 1.5). Salvage radiation reduced the number of T790M-mutant subclones, and the relative T790M abundance was significantly lower than that without radiation at 90 days (10.94% vs. 21.54%). Prophylactic radiation prevented the development of T790M subclones. These results were also confirmed in vivo. qRT-PCR revealed threefold elevation of miR-1243 in PC-9-GR cells, and the increased radiosensitivity of PC-9-GR cells was inhibited when miR-1243 was knocked down. RNA sequencing revealed that SPOCK1 was downregulated in PC-9-GR cells. Interestingly, bioinformatic analysis showed that SPOCK1 was a target gene of miR-1243. SPOCK1 knockdown markedly increased the radiosensitivity of PC-9 cells.

Conclusion

Gefitinib-resistant NSCLC with the T790M mutation had higher radiosensitivity than that without the mutation, possibly mediated by SPOCK1. Early radiotherapy can eliminate T790M subclones, providing evidence for the benefit of early local treatment in patients with TKI-resistant NSCLC.

Patient-reported outcomes for the phase 3 FURLONG study of furmonertinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Furmonertinib showed superior efficacy compared with gefitinib as first-line therapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the FURLONG study. Here we present prespecified secondary endpoints of patient-reported outcomes (PRO).

Methods

In this multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 3 study, patients were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive furmonertinib 80 mg once daily or gefitinib 250 mg once daily. PROs assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 were analysed using a mixed model for repeated measures and time-to-event analyses. A difference in score of 10 points or more was deemed clinically relevant.

Findings

Three hundred and fifty-seven patients (furmonertinib group, n = 178; gefitinib group, n = 179) received at least one dose of the study drug, all of whom completed at least one PRO assessment. Statistically significant difference of overall score changes from baseline favoured furmonertinib in physical functioning (between-group difference 2.14 [95% CI 0.25-4.04], p = 0.027), nausea/vomiting (-1.56 [95% CI -2.62 to -0.49], p = 0.004), appetite loss (-2.24 [95% CI -4.26 to -0.23], p = 0.029), diarrhoea (-3.36 [95% CI -5.19 to -1.54], p < 0.001), alopecia (-2.62 [95% CI -4.54 to -0.71], p = 0.007), and pain in other parts (-4.55 [95% CI -7.37 to -1.74], p = 0.002), but not reached clinical relevance. Time to deterioration in physical functioning (hazard ratio 0.63 [95% CI 0.42-0.94], p = 0.021), cognitive functioning (0.73 [95% CI 0.54-0.98], p = 0.034), nausea/vomiting (0.64 [95% CI 0.41-0.99], p = 0.042), appetite loss (0.63 [95% CI 0.43-0.92], p = 0.016), diarrhoea (0.63 [95% CI 0.46-0.85], p = 0.002), dyspnoea (0.72 [95% CI 0.53-0.98], p = 0.034), cough (0.67 [95% CI 0.44-1.00], p = 0.049), dysphagia (0.54 [95% CI 0.35-0.83], p = 0.004), and alopecia (0.62 [95% CI 0.42-0.90], p = 0.012) was longer with furmonertinib versus gefitinib.

Interpretation

In patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, furmonertinib showed improved scores and delayed deterioration in several functioning and symptoms compared to gefitinib.

Funding

Shanghai Allist Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd and the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2017ZX09304015).

A Visual Analysis of the Research Dynamics in Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors for NSCLC

Purpose

Activating mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been identified as key predictive biomarkers for the customized treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), aiding in improving patient response rates and survival. However, resistance challenges the efficacy of these treatments, with limited understanding of post-resistance therapeutic strategies. A deep understanding of the biology and resistance mechanisms of EGFR-mutant NSCLC is crucial for developing new treatment approaches. This study, through bibliometric analysis, summarizes the trends in research on resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

Methods

Research papers on NSCLC with EGFR inhibitor resistance were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The analysis utilized bibliometric tools like CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and other platforms for comprehensive analysis and visualization of the outcomes.

Results

The WoSCC database contains a total of 5866 documents on resistance to EGFR-TKIs treatment, including 4727 articles (93.48%) and 1139 reviews (6.52%), spanning 81 countries and regions, 4792 institutions, with the involvement of 23,594 authors. Since 2016, there has been a significant increase in publications in this field. China has the highest publication output, while the United States has the highest citation count for papers. Harvard University leads in terms of the number of publications. Among the top ten journals with the highest output, Clinical Cancer Research has the highest impact factor at 11.5, with 90% of the journals classified in Q1 or Q2. Rafael Rosell is one of the most influential authors in this field, ranking second in publication volume and fourth in citation count. Research on EGFR-TKIs resistance mainly focuses on genetic testing, resistance mechanisms, and post-resistance treatment strategies.

Conclusion

This study provides researchers with a reliable basis and guidance for finding authoritative references, understanding research trends, and exploring potential directions.

Top 20 EGFR+ NSCLC Clinical and Translational Science Papers That Shaped the 20 Years Since the Discovery of Activating EGFR Mutations in NSCLC. An Editor-in-Chief Expert Panel Consensus Survey

The year 2024 is the 20th anniversary of the discovery of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since then, tremendous advances have been made in the treatment of NSCLC based on this discovery. Some of these studies have led to seismic changes in the concept of oncology research and spurred treatment advances beyond NSCLC, leading to a current true era of precision oncology for all solid tumors. We now routinely molecularly profile all tumor types and even plasma samples of patients with NSCLC for multiple actionable driver mutations, independent of patient clinical characteristics nor is profiling limited to the advanced incurable stage. We are increasingly monitoring treatment responses and detecting resistance to targeted therapy by using plasma genotyping. Furthermore, we are now profiling early-stage NSCLC for appropriate adjuvant targeted treatment leading to an eventual potential "cure" in early-stage EGFR+ NSCLC which have societal implication on implementing lung cancer screening in never-smokers as most EGFR+ NSCLC patients are never-smokers. All these advances were unfathomable in 2004 when the five papers that described "discoveries" of activating EGFR mutations (del19, L858R, exon 20 insertions, and "uncommon" mutations) were published. To commemorate this 20th anniversary, we assembled a global panel of thoracic medical oncology experts to select the top 20 papers (publications or congress presentation) from the 20 years since this seminal discovery with December 31, 2023 as the cutoff date for inclusion of papers to be voted on. Papers ranked 21 to 30 were considered "honorable mention" and also annotated. Our objective is that these 30 papers with their annotations about their impact and even all the ranked papers will serve as "syllabus" for the education of future thoracic oncology trainees. Finally, we mentioned potential practice-changing clinical trials to be reported. One of them, LAURA was published online on June 2, 2024 was not included in the list of papers to be voted on but will surely be highly ranked if this consensus survery is performed again on the 25th anniversay of the discovery EGFR mutations (i.e. top 25 papers on the 25 years since the discovery of activating EGFR mutations).

EGFR kinase domain duplication in lung adenocarcinoma with systemic and intracranial response to a double-dose of furmonertinib: a case report and literature review

Background

EGFR kinase domain duplication (EGFR-KDD) is an infrequent oncogenic driver mutation in lung adenocarcinoma. It may be a potential target benefit from EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old Chinese male was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma in stage IVb with brain metastases. Next-generation sequencing revealed EGFR-KDD mutation. The patient received furmonertinib 160mg daily for anti-cancer treatment and obtained therapeutic efficacy with partial response (PR). Progression-free survival (PFS) duration from monotherapy was 16 months. With slow progressions, combined radiotherapy and anti-vascular targeted therapy also brought a continuous decrease in the tumors. The patient has an overall survival (OS) duration of more than 22 months and still benefits from double-dose furmonertinib.

Conclusions

This report provided direct evidence for the treatment of EGFR-KDD to use furmonertinib. A Large-scale study is needed to confirm this preliminary finding.

The Design for a Phase II, Randomized, Multicenter Study of CtDNA-Guided Treatment With Furmonertinib Combined Therapy or Furmonertinib Alone for Untreated Advanced EGFR Mutant Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients: The FOCUS-C Study

BACKGROUND

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have significant antitumor activity to advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with classic EGFR mutations. However, EGFR-TKI monotherapy shows poor efficacy in patients whose circulating tumor cell DNA (ctDNA) of EGFR mutations cannot be rapidly cleared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

As a third-generation TKI, furmonertinib has shown superior antitumor activity and minor toxicity. The FOCUS-C study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT05334277) to explore the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib plus pemetrexed-platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab versus furmonertinib monotherapy in untreated advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC patients without EGFR clearance after the induction therapy of furmonertinib. Patients with EGFR clearance will still receive furmonertinib as Arm A. Patients without ctDNA clearance will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio as Arm B1 (furmonertinib), Arm B2 (furmonertinib combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed for 4 cycles, and then furmonertinib and pemetrexed as maintenance therapy) and Arm B3 (Arm B2 regimen plus bevacizumab). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) in Arm B2/B1. Secondary endpoints include PFS in Arm B3/B1, PFS in Arm A/B1, PFS in Arm B3/B2, objective response and disease control rate, overall survival and safety in all Arms. Exploratory endpoints are focused on the efficacy based on plasma NGS at different timepoints.

CONCLUSION

This study will evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of furmonertinib plus carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab verses furmonertinib alone in untreated patients with advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC without EGFR clearance.

Non-small cell lung cancer: an update on emerging EGFR-targeted therapies

INTRODUCTION

Current research in EGFR-mutated NSCLC focuses on the management of drug resistance and uncommon mutations, as well as on the opportunity to extend targeted therapies' field of action to earlier stages of disease.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a review analyzing literature from the PubMed database with the aim to describe the current state of art in the management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, but also to explore new strategies under investigation. To this purpose, we collected recruiting phase II-III trials registered on Clinicaltrials.govand conducted on EGFR-mutated NSCLC both in early and advanced stage.

EXPERT OPINION

With this review, we want to provide an exhaustive overview of current and new potential treatments in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with emphasis on the most promising newly investigated strategies, such as association therapies in the first-line setting involving EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy (FLAURA2) or drugs targeting different driver pathways (MARIPOSA). We also aimed at unearthing challenges to achieve in this field, specifically the need to fully exploit already available compounds while developing new ones, the management of new emerging toxicities and the necessity to improve our biological understanding of the disease to design trials with a solid scientific rationale and to allow treatment personalization such in case of uncommon mutations.

Clinical Management of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Brain Metastases, and Actionable Genomic Alterations: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 60% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with metastatic disease, and approximately 20% have brain metastases (BrMs) at diagnosis. During the disease course, 25-50% of patients will develop BrMs. Despite available treatments, survival rates for patients with NSCLC and BrMs remain low, and their overall prognosis is poor. Even with newer agents for NSCLC, options for treating BrMs can be limited by their ineffective transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the unique brain tumor microenvironment. The presence of actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) is a key determinant of optimal treatment selection, which aims to maximize responses and minimize toxicities. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to understand the current landscape of the clinical management of patients with NSCLC and BrMs, particularly those with AGAs.

METHOD

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-compliant SLR was conducted to identify studies in patients with BrMs in NSCLC. Searches used the EMBASE and MEDLINE® databases, and articles published between January 1, 2017 and September 26, 2022 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Overall, 179 studies were included in the SLR. This subset review focused on 80 studies that included patients with NSCLC, BrMs, and AGAs (19 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], two single-arm studies, and 59 observational studies). Sixty-four of the 80 studies reported on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, 14 on anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations, and two on both alterations. Ninety-five percent of studies evaluated targeted therapy. All RCTs allowed patients with previously treated, asymptomatic, or neurologically stable BrMs; the percentage of asymptomatic BrMs varied across observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although targeted therapies demonstrate systemic benefits for patients with NSCLC, BrMs, and AGAs, there remains a continued need for effective therapies to treat and prevent BrMs in this population. Increased BBB permeability of emerging therapies may improve outcomes for this population.

Multi-omics pan-cancer study of SPTBN2 and its value as a potential therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer

SPTBN2 is a protein-coding gene that is closely related to the development of malignant tumors. However, its prognostic value and biological function in pan-cancer, especially pancreatic cancer (PAAD), have not been reported. In the present study, a novel exploration of the value and potential mechanism of SPTBN2 in PAAD was conducted using multi-omics in the background of pan-cancer. Via various database analysis, up-regulated expression of SPTBN2 was detected in most of the tumor tissues examined. Overexpression of SPTBN2 in PAAD and kidney renal clear cell cancer patients potentially affected overall survival, disease-specific survival, and progression-free interval. In PAAD, SPTBN2 can be used as an independent factor affecting prognosis. Mutations and amplification of SPTBN2 were detected, with abnormal methylation of SPTBN2 affecting its expression and the survival outcome of PAAD patients. Immunoassay results demonstrate that SPTBN2 was a potential biomarker for predicting therapeutic response in PAAD, and may influence the immunotherapy efficacy of PAAD by regulating levels of CD8 + T cells and neutrophil infiltration. Results from an enrichment analysis indicated that SPTBN2 may regulate the development of PAAD via immune pathways. Thus, SPTBN2 is a potential prognostic biomarker and immunotherapy target based on its crucial role in the development of PAAD.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with driver alterations.

METHODS

This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Eight new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients based on targetable driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

A study of high dose furmonertinib in EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) ex20ins mutation, as a rare subtype of mutation, has gradually attracted attention. Its heterogeneity is high, its prognosis is extremely poor, and the efficacy of existing traditional treatment plans is limited. In this study, we aimed to evaluate efficacy of high dose furmonertinib as a first-line treatment for EGFR ex20ins-positive NSCLC.

Methods

This is a retrospective, multi-center, non-interventional study. From May 2021 to March 2023, 9 NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins were enrolled. Efficacy and safety of 160 mg furmonertinib were evaluated. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed.

Results

Of the evaluated patients, six patients experienced partial remission (PR), two patients experienced stable disease (SD) and one patient experienced progress disease (PD). Data indicated 66.7% ORR and 88.9% DCR. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.616 - 7.784). Besides, a longgest PFS with 18 months was found in one patient with p.H773_V774insGTNPH mutation. No ≥ level 3 adverse events have been found.

Conclusions

The study proved the potential efficacy of 160mg furmonertinib in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. Meanwhile, 160mg furmonertinib had a good safety profile.

New Treatment Options for Patients With Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Focusing on EGFR-Mutant Tumors

Druggable oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer has led to innovative systemic treatment options, improving patients' outcome. This benefit is not only achieved in the metastatic setting but also in the postsurgical setting, such as in lung cancers harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation or ALK-rearrangement. To enhance the outcome of these patients, we need to understand the mechanisms of acquired resistance and evaluate the role of new drugs with novel mechanisms of action in the treatment landscape. In this chapter, we review treatment strategies of EGFR-mutant tumors in all stages, the mechanisms of acquired strategies, and novel therapies in this subset.

Feasibility and safety of EGFR-TKI neoadjuvant therapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of neoadjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeted therapy for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. Previous studies have shown that EGFR-TKIs have excellent anti-tumor activity. However, almost all studies on neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC have been non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes and different methods of statistical analysis, which may lead to a lack of valid metrics to assess the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Results including objective response rate (ORR), complete resection rate (R0), downstaging rate, pathological complete response (PCR), major pathological response (MPR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were used for further analysis.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis ultimately included 11 studies involving 344 patients with EGFR-positive mutations in NSCLC. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR was 57% (95% CI: 42%-73%), and in the Osimertinib subgroup, the pooled ORR was 80% (95% CI: 63%-98%). Analysis of studies that reported a downstaging rate showed the pooled downstaging rate of 41% (95% CI: 9%-74%) and the pooled downstaging rate of 74% (95% CI: 22%-100%) in the Osimertinib subgroup. In terms of surgical outcomes, the pooled pCR rate was 3% (95% CI: 0%-7%), the pooled MPR rate was 11% (95% CI: 6%-17%), and the pooled R0 resection rate was 91% (95% CI: 85%-95%). The most common adverse events associated with neoadjuvant therapy were rash and diarrhea. The pooled incidence of any grade of rash was 47.1% (95% CI: 25.4%-69.3%), and the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 rash was 0.6% (95% CI: 0.0%-2.5%). The pooled incidence of diarrhea of any grade was 28.8% (95% CI: 14.4%-45.4%), with the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea of 0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.6%). The pooled incidence of ≥ grade 3 adverse events was significantly lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKIs for the treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR-positive mutations and that third-generation EGFR-TKIs were superior to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs in terms of shrinking tumor volume and lowering tumor stage; however, future large-scale and multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023466731.

Successful therapy of a critically ill non-small cell lung cancer patient with compound mutations in EGFR G719X and S768I genes using furmonertinib: A case report

Background

Somatic mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genes, such as G719X and S768I, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been confirmed to be promising for developing new targeted therapies against advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The G719X and S768I mutations are uncommon and often occur in the form of compound mutations. However, the efficacy of furmonertinib in patients with these uncommon compound mutations has not yet been elucidated.

Case presentation

In this study, the G719X/S768I compound mutations were detected in a critically ill NSCLC patient. This patient received furmonertinib for 14 months and successfully responded to the treatment. The present case report highlights the ideal clinical response, with ongoing follow-up.

Conclusion

We report the successful treatment of a critically ill NSCLC patient carrying rare compound EGFR G719X and S768I mutations using furmonertinib. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a successful furmonertinib treatment of compound EGFR G719X and S768I mutations. Furmonertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, may be effective in controlling the EGFR G719X and S768I compound mutations in NSCLC.

The efficacy of furmonertinib in untreated advanced NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations in a real-world setting: a single institutional experience

Background

Furmonertinib is the standard treatment option in the first-line setting for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in China. However, there are limited real-world data available.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study at a single center, analyzing a cohort of 73 NSCLC patients who tested positive for EGFR mutations and were treated with furmonertinib as their initial therapy between August 2022 and December 2023. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety profile.

Results

The median observation period was 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-20.0). The median PFS was 19.5 months (95% CI, 14.6-24.4). OS data were not yet mature. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between PFS and factors such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, presence of brain or liver metastases, sex, age, EGFR mutation status, or number of metastatic sites. However, multivariate analysis indicated a potential trend toward extended PFS in patients younger than 65 years (p = 0.053, 95% CI, 0.10-1.02), although the p-value was only marginally significant. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (24%), anemia (36%), and liver injury (32%); however, only four cases experienced severe adverse events.

Conclusion

In a real-world setting, furmonertinib appears to be a favorable treatment option for EGFR-mutated patients. The manageable nature of adverse events further supports its use in clinical practice.

Furmonertinib for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a glittering diamond in the rough of EGFR-TKI

The third-generation EGFR-TKIs, such as osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib, have been recommended as the preferred treatment for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among them, furmonertinib shows several advantages in terms of clinical efficacy. Firstly, compared to osimertinib and aumolertinib, furmonertinib was the first EGFR-TKI with median progression-free survival (mPFS) of over 20.0 m (20.8 m) for advanced NSCLC with classical EGFR-mutations. Furthermore, furmonertinib achieved a mPFS of 18.1 m in advanced NSCLC with unfavorable prognostic factors, such as the 21 L858R mutation and central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, which is unrivalled by osimertinib. Secondly, furmonertinib is the only FDA-approved EGFR-TKI for breakthrough therapy in newly-diagnosed advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins mutation. Thirdly, the relatively longer mPFS of 20.8 m was observed in furmonertinib compared to osimertinib and aumolertinib (15.2 m and 15.3 m) in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC with CNS metastases. More importantly, the efficacy of furmonertinib increases within the dose range of 80-240 mg per day. Finally, furmonertinib can be an optional treatment for advanced NSCLC patients who develop resistance to osimertinib or aumolertinib. In conclusion, furmonertinib may be a glittering star in the field of EGFR-TKI, which requires further exploration and expansion.

The Role of Microglia in Brain Metastases: Mechanisms and Strategies

Brain metastases and related complications are one of the major fatal factors in cancer. Patients with breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma are at a high risk of developing brain metastases. However, the mechanisms underlying the brain metastatic cascade remain poorly understood. Microglia, one of the major resident macrophages in the brain parenchyma, are involved in multiple processes associated with brain metastasis, including inflammation, angiogenesis, and immune modulation. They also closely interact with metastatic cancer cells, astrocytes, and other immune cells. Current therapeutic approaches against metastatic brain cancers, including small-molecule drugs, antibody-coupled drugs (ADCs), and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have compromised efficacy owing to the impermeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and complex brain microenvironment. Targeting microglia is one of the strategies for treating metastatic brain cancer. In this review, we summarize the multifaceted roles of microglia in brain metastases and highlight them as potential targets for future therapeutic interventions.

Dynamic Analysis of the Impact of Micropapillary Component on Different Recurrence Patterns of Pathological Stage IA3 Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the dynamic impact of the micropapillary (MIP) component on local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and multiple recurrence (MR) of pathological stage IA3 lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Between July 2012 and July 2020, a total of 351 patients at two medical institutions were enrolled in this study. Cumulative incidence of curves, dynamic risk curves, and time-dependent multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of the MIP component on patients.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative incidence of total recurrence with or without an MIP component was 34.2% and 12.3%, respectively (p = 0.001). In three recurrence patterns, our findings revealed that the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR (p = 0.048) and DM (p = 0.005) was higher in the 'MIP-present' group than in the 'MIP-absent' group. In the dynamic recurrence curve, the risk of the three recurrence patterns was different and varied over time between the two groups, especially in DM. Moreover, the dynamic cumulative event curve showed that after 1, 2, and 3 years of survival, the cumulative incidence of DM in the group with MIP continued to be higher than that in the group without MIP (all p < 0.05). Time-dependent Cox regression analysis indicated that the MIP component continued to be an independent risk factor for the cumulative incidence of DM in patients with 3-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the three recurrence patterns, the MIP component mainly aggravated the risk of DM in patients with pathological stage IA3 lung adenocarcinoma, which persisted for 3 years.

Treatment patterns and survival analysis in patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with unresectable Stage III EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with unresectable Stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC spanning from 2012 to 2022. Treatment patterns were outlined, and survival comparisons between different treatment groups were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients were included: 62.5% received TKI alone, 26.1% received TKI+chemotherapy, 4.5% received radiotherapy, 4.5% participated in clinical trials, and 2.4% received TKI+antiangiogenic drugs. Prior to propensity score matching, TKI+chemotherapy and TKI alone groups demonstrated similar progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-2.80; P = 0.134), overall survival (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.59-2.13; P = 0.733), and locoregional-free survival (HR = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.75-2.81; P = 0.267). However, TKI+chemotherapy showed reduced distant metastasis-free survival compared to TKI alone (HR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.11-5.18; P = 0.022). After propensity score matching, no significant differences were observed in progression-free survival (P = 0.435), overall survival (P = 0.205), locoregional-free survival (P = 0.706), and distant metastasis-free survival (P = 0.171) between the TKI+chemotherapy and TKI alone groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of chemotherapy to TKI did not enhance survival outcomes compared to TKI monotherapy in patients with unresectable Stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Therapeutic role of EGFR - Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a significant complication that advances fast and has a poor prognosis for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Current therapies for LM are inconsistent and ineffective, and established techniques such as radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery continue to fall short of potential outcomes. Nonetheless, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) exhibit potent anti-tumor activity and hold considerable promise for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. Thus, assessing EGFR-TKIs effectiveness in treating these central nervous system (CNS) problems is crucial. This review integrates current literature on the intracranial efficacy of EGFR-TKIs to explore the varying impacts of approved EGFR-TKIs in LM patients and the therapeutic possibilities presented by other EGFR-TKIs in development. To delineate the optimal clinical treatment strategy, further exploration is needed regarding the optimal sequencing of EGFR-TKIs and the selection of alternative therapy options following initial treatment failure with EGFR-TKIs.

First report of furmonertinib as a first-line treatment in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations after the kinase domain αC-helix: Two case reports and a literature review

RATIONALE

Many studies have shown that first- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are less effective in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations. The efficacy of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors is still under investigation. Although new targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibody-based agents have made significant advances in the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFR ex20ins) mutation, the efficacy of these novel agents is not quite satisfactory. Platinum- and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment for patients harboring EGFR ex20ins mutation.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report for the first time 2 Chinese patients diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR ex20ins mutations after analysis of the αC-helix sequence by next-generation sequencing. Both patients were treated with furmonertinib as the first-line therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

The first case included a 38-year-old female who had an EGFR ex20ins mutation (p.S768_D770dupSVD). After 1 month of treatment with furmonertinib, her symptoms of pain and cough were significantly alleviated. She achieved a partial response according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.[1] The final progression-free survival was 8.13 months. The second case included a 40-year-old male who had an EGFR ex20ins mutation (p.N771_P772insVal). He had a good response to furmonertinib and exhibited stable disease according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors with a progression-free survival of 10.90 months.

OUTCOMES

Both patients experienced significant improvement in symptoms and prolonged survival after furmonertinib was used as first-line treatment. Side effects were limited but manageable.

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates that furmonertinib may be a first-line treatment option for patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR ex20ins mutation.

Targeted Inhibitors of EGFR: Structure, Biology, Biomarkers, and Clinical Applications

Members of the EGFR family of tyrosine kinase receptors are major regulators of cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival. In humans, abnormal activation of EGFR is associated with the development and progression of many cancer types, which makes it an attractive target for molecular-guided therapy. Two classes of EGFR-targeted cancer therapeutics include monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which bind to the extracellular domain of EGFR, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which mostly target the intracellular part of EGFR and inhibit its activity in molecular signaling. While EGFR-specific mAbs and three generations of TKIs have demonstrated clinical efficacy in various settings, molecular evolution of tumors leads to apparent and sometimes inevitable resistance to current therapeutics, which highlights the need for deeper research in this field. Here, we tried to provide a comprehensive and systematic overview of the rationale, molecular mechanisms, and clinical significance of the current EGFR-targeting drugs, highlighting potential candidate molecules in development. We summarized the underlying mechanisms of resistance and available personalized predictive approaches that may lead to improved efficacy of EGFR-targeted therapies. We also discuss recent developments and the use of specific therapeutic strategies, such as multi-targeting agents and combination therapies, for overcoming cancer resistance to EGFR-specific drugs.

Epidermal growth factor receptor compound and concomitant mutations: advances in precision treatment strategies

ABSTRACT

Epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutations are common oncogenic driver mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The application of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is beneficial for patients with advanced and early-stage NSCLC. With the development of next-generation sequencing technology, numerous patients have been found to have more than one genetic mutation in addition to a single EGFR mutation; however, the efficacy of conventional EGFR-TKIs and the optimal treatments for such patients remain largely unknown. Thus, we review the incidence, prognosis, and current treatment regimens of EGFR compound mutations and EGFR concomitant mutations to provide treatment recommendations and guidance for patients with these mutations.

Recent advances progress of targeted drugs combined with radiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a review

Targeted drug therapy plays an important role in the clinical application of non-small cell lung cancer, especially adenocarcinoma. However, for patients with advanced disease, drug resistance after targeted therapy, unclear target, and other reasons that cannot or do not want surgery, the combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunity, etc. is often used. The synergistic effect of targeted drugs and radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer has shown good clinical efficacy. This article reviews the clinical progress of targeted drug therapy combined with radiotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in recent years, in order to provide new ideas for further clinical research of this treatment mode.

Effectiveness comparison of third-generation EGFR-TKI as initial and sequential therapy in adjuvant treatment for EGFR mutation-sensitive stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer after surgery

Introduction

Although third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) Osimertinib has been approved as adjuvant therapy for resected stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR-sensitive mutations, the optimal treatment sequencing of EGFR-TKIs, particularly whether Osimertinib should be the initial or sequential therapy following the first-generation EGFR-TKIs remains uncertain.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients with EGFR-mutated stage IIIA NSCLC who received treatment with either first-generation EGFR-TKIs or Osimertinib (third-generation) alone, or in sequential combination, at a single institution. The data analysis involved using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression.

Results

Out of the total 148 patients with stage IIIA NSCLC included in the study, 76 individuals underwent treatment with either first-generation EGFR-TKIs (referred to as subgroup "1″) or exclusively Osimertinib (subgroup "0 + 3″), or a sequential combination of the two (subgroup "1 + 3″) following surgery. Both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that there were no discernible disparities in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival between subgroup " 1″ and " 1 + 3," nor between subgroup " 0 + 3″ and "1 + 3".

Conclusion

The findings from this study indicate that the introduction of third-generation EGFR-TKI Osimertinib did not yield enhanced survival benefits when compared to the first-generation drug in patients with stage IIIA completely resected NSCLC who were administered EGFR-TKIs as part of their postoperative adjuvant treatment. Additionally, within the observed sample size of this cohort, the sequential use of Osimertinib alongside first-generation EGFR-TKI did not demonstrate superiority over using either the first-generation EGFR-TKI or Osimertinib alone in terms of postoperative survival.

Epidemiological characteristics and therapeutic advances of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

The third most prevalent type of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, EGFR exon 20 insertions (EGFRex20ins), involves 2%-12% of all cases of EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approximately 90% of the mutations occur within the loop structure region, and the most frequently reported subtypes are A767_V769dup and S768_D770dup, which together account for almost 50% of instances. Apart from the unique subtype of A763_Y764insFQEA, NSCLCs with EGFRex20ins are resistant to approved EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and are also insensitive to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. A new modality of treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFRx20ins has been established with the approval of mobocertinib and amivantamab. There are also numerous novel targeted treatments for NSCLC with EGFRex20ins in development, which are anticipated to improve this patient population's survival even further. This review provides a reference for the clinical management of these patients by summarizing the most recent epidemiological, and clinicopathological characteristics, diagnostic techniques, and therapeutic advances of EGFRex20ins in NSCLC.

Clinical outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients with different EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A single-center ambispective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Clinical significance of various subtypes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion (ex19del) mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed EGFR ex19del subtypes in NSCLC patients receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy at our center (January 2018-June 2022) and correlated them with median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS).

RESULTS

We identified 17 different EGFR ex19del variants in 101 patients. Between the classic (E746_A750del, 64.4%) and nonclassic groups (the rest variants), no significant difference was observed in mPFS (13.5 vs. 19.3 months, p = 0.18) or mOS (44.1 vs. 77.0 months, p = 0.06). mPFS showed no significant difference between ex19del subgroups classified based on the presence of insertion (ex19delins), starting position or length of deletion. However, patients with ex19delins starting at E746 showed longer mPFS than the others (29.7 vs. 12.5 months, p = 0.04), and patients with ex19del of 15 nucleotides had shorter mOS than the others (44.1 vs. 77.0 months, p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, ex19delins independently predicted a better PFS (HR = 0.311, p = 0.03); however, 15 nucleotide deletion was no longer associated with OS (HR = 0.181, p = 0.11). Secondary T790M mutation incidence was significantly higher in the ex19del subgroup starting at E746 than the others (64.7% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed potential differences in TKI efficacy, resistance mechanism, and prognosis of various EGFR ex19del subtypes in NSCLC, underscoring the need for precise selection of first-line therapy.

New Generations of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Treating NSCLC with Oncogene Addiction: Strengths and Limitations

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring most driver gene alterations. Starting from the first generation, research rapidly moved to the development of newer, more selective generations of TKIs, obtaining improved results in terms of disease control and survival. However, the use of novel generations of TKIs is not without limitations. We reviewed the main results obtained, as well as the ongoing clinical trials with TKIs in oncogene-addicted NSCLC, together with the biology underlying their potential strengths and limitations. Across driver gene alterations, novel generations of TKIs allowed delayed resistance, prolonged survival, and improved brain penetration compared to previous generations, although with different toxicity profiles, that generally moved their use from further lines to the front-line treatment. However, the anticipated positioning of novel generation TKIs leads to abolishing the possibility of TKI treatment sequencing and any role of previous generations. In addition, under the selective pressure of such more potent drugs, resistant clones emerge harboring more complex and hard-to-target resistance mechanisms. Deeper knowledge of tumor biology and drug properties will help identify new strategies, including combinatorial treatments, to continue improving results in patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

Successful therapy using high-dose furmonertinib for non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis: a case report and literature review

Background

Lung cancer is the second most common form of malignant tumor and has the highest mortality rate worldwide. Among its subtypes, lung adenocarcinoma is the most prevalent. Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is rare and is characterized by a dismal prognosis, with overall survival periods typically spanning 4 to 6 weeks without treatment. However, in specific cases, survival can be extended to 4 to 6 months with appropriate therapy. The recent approval of third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib, has introduced promising treatment options for individuals with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop LM after developing resistance to first- and second-generation TKIs. These third-generation TKIs exhibit an enhanced ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), opening up new avenues for managing this challenging condition.

Case summary

We report the case of a 48-year-old Chinese man diagnosed with advanced NSCLC harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Following a pulmonary lobectomy and postoperative adjuvant therapy with gefitinib, the patient was diagnosed with LM, which was confirmed by his neurologic symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid cytologic analysis, and cranial enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, he received oral treatment in the form of 160 mg of furmonertinib daily. After 5 days of furmonertinib therapy, the patient recovered from lethargy, with an obvious improvement in cognitive function. Follow-up visits revealed a 6-month survival period following the LM diagnosis. Patients with NSCLC and LM typically present with severe symptoms, and the efficacy of systemic treatment, intrathecal chemotherapy, and radiotherapy remains unsatisfactory. We hope that this specific case provide valuable insights into the management of patients with EGFR mutation-associated NSCLC with LM.

Conclusion

Furmonertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI with notable BBB penetration, shows promise in LM control and the rapid alleviation of intracranial symptoms. Further investigations into appropriate dosage and toxicity management are imperative.

Resistance of Lung Cancer to EGFR-Specific Kinase Inhibitors: Activation of Bypass Pathways and Endogenous Mutators

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have changed the landscape of lung cancer therapy. For patients who are treated with the new TKIs, the current median survival exceeds 3 years, substantially better than the average 20 month survival rate only a decade ago. Unfortunately, despite initial efficacy, nearly all treated patients evolve drug resistance due to the emergence of either new mutations or rewired signaling pathways that engage other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), such as MET, HER3 and AXL. Apparently, the emergence of mutations is preceded by a phase of epigenetic alterations that finely regulate the cell cycle, bias a mesenchymal phenotype and activate antioxidants. Concomitantly, cells that evade TKI-induced apoptosis (i.e., drug-tolerant persister cells) activate an intrinsic mutagenic program reminiscent of the SOS system deployed when bacteria are exposed to antibiotics. This mammalian system imbalances the purine-to-pyrimidine ratio, inhibits DNA repair and boosts expression of mutation-prone DNA polymerases. Thus, the net outcome of the SOS response is a greater probability to evolve new mutations. Deeper understanding of the persister-to-resister transformation, along with the development of next-generation TKIs, EGFR-specific proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), as well as bispecific antibodies, will permit delaying the onset of relapses and prolonging survival of patients with EGFR+ lung cancer.

Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Treatment-Naíve Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: Analysis of the Asian Subpopulation in LASER301

INTRODUCTION

Lazertinib is a third-generation central nervous system-penetrant tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting mutant EGFR in NSCLC. Lazertinib exhibited improved efficacy versus gefitinib in the LASER301 study; this subset analysis compared lazertinib with gefitinib among Asian patients.

METHODS

The phase 3 LASER301 study evaluated lazertinib efficacy and safety in treatment-naive patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were randomized one-to-one and received either lazertinib or gefitinib. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and safety.

RESULTS

Between February 13, 2020, and July 29, 2022, among 258 patients of Asian descent, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer with lazertinib than gefitinib (20.6 versus 9.7 mo; hazard ratio: 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.63, p < 0.001), and the benefit was consistent across predefined subgroups (exon 19 deletion, L858R, baseline central nervous system metastases). Objective response rate and disease control rates were similar between treatment groups. The median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI: 16.6-24.9) versus 9.6 months (95% CI: 6.9-12.4) in the lazertinib versus gefitinib group. Adverse event rates in Asian patients were comparable with the overall LASER301 population. Adverse events leading to discontinuation in the lazertinib and gefitinib groups were 13% and 12%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In LASER301, efficacy and safety results in Asian patients were consistent with the overall population. Lazertinib exhibited better efficacy than gefitinib in Asian patients with a tolerable safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of re-challenging 160 mg furmonertinib for advanced NSCLC after resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs targeted agents: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) show good selectivity for classical EGFR mutated and EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, resistance inevitably occurs to third-generation EGFR-TKI. This study describes the real-world characteristics, efficacy, and safety of treating post-progression NSCLC with 160 mg of furmonertinib (in combination with or without anti-angiogenic agents and chemotherapy) with third-generation EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with intracranial progression pattern cohort (IP cohort) or extracranial progression pattern cohort (EP cohort) were retrospectively analyzed following progression to third-generation EGFR-TKIs receiving furmonertinib 160 mg daily as second-line or later treatment in combination with or without anti-angiogenic agents and chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included and categorized into two groups according to the progression pattern. Then, 22 patients in the IP cohort and 17 patients in the EP cohort, most of whom were in poor physical condition, were included and 84.6% had central nervous system metastases. In the IP cohort, the median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 4.67-8.72), and the median OS was 9.8 months (95% CI 7.25-11.20) for single-agent furmonertinib or combination therapy. In the EP cohort, the median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI 2.18-4.70), and the median OS was 6.7 months (95% CI 4.99-8.75). Univariate analysis showed the association between the presence of a prior T790M mutation and a history of combined radiotherapy with longer PFS with furmonertinib (p = 0.048, p = 0.004). Overall, adverse events (AEs) of any grade occurred in 84.6% of patients (33/39), with the majority having grade 2 or lower AEs.

CONCLUSION

Furmonertinib 160 mg is an optional regimen for patients with advanced NSCLC who develop resistance after treatment with third-generation EGFR-TKIs, especially those developing resistance due to the progression of intracranial lesions, with good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile that warrants further exploration.

Befotertinib (D-0316) versus icotinib as first-line therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Befotertinib (D-0316) is a novel, selective oral third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. This phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of befotertinib with icotinib as a first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This study was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 study at 39 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older, had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV unresectable NSCLC, and had confirmed exon 19 deletions or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system to receive either oral befotertinib (75-100 mg once daily) or oral icotinib (125 mg three times per day) in 21-day cycles until disease progression or withdrawal criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by type of EGFR mutation, CNS metastasis status, and gender, and participants, investigators, and data analysts were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival in the full analysis set, which comprised all randomly assigned patients. All patients who received at least one dose of the study drug were included in safety analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04206072, and the overall survival follow-up is still in progress.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 24, 2019, and Dec 18, 2020, 568 patients were screened, of whom 362 were randomly assigned to the befotertinib (n=182) or icotinib (n=180) group; all 362 patients were included in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 20·7 months (IQR 10·2-23·5) in the befotertinib group and 19·4 months (10·3-23·5) in the icotinib group. Median IRC-assessed progression-free survival was 22·1 months (95% CI 17·9-not estimable) in the befotertinib group and 13·8 months (12·4-15·2) in the icotinib group (hazard ratio 0·49 [95% CI 0·36-0·68], p<0·0001). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55 (30%) of 182 patients in the befotertinib group and in 14 (8%) of 180 patients in the icotinib group. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 37 (20%) patients in the befotertinib group and in five (3%) patients in the icotinib group. Two (1%) patients in the befotertinib group and one (1%) patient in the icotinib group died due to treatment-related adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Befotertinib demonstrated superior efficacy compared with icotinib in first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Although serious adverse events were more common in the befotertinib than the icotinib arm, the safety profile of befotertinib was manageable overall.

FUNDING

Betta Pharmaceuticals (China).

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Efficacy, safety and dose selection of AZD3759 in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer and central nervous system metastases in China (CTONG1702-Arm 8): a multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Background

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases is inevitable for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). AZD3759 is a novel EGFR-TKI with impressive CNS penetration.

Methods

We initiated a phase 2, multi-center, umbrella trial (CTONG1702, NCT03574402). The eighth arm assessed the efficacy and safety of AZD3759 in untreated EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases. The primary objective was the objective response rate (ORR). Simon's minimax two-stage design was used to calculate the sample size. Dose optimal selection was performed using 200- and 300-mg bid cohorts.

Findings

Between Oct 18, 2018 and Sep 14, 2020, 30 patients received AZD3759 at 200 mg (n = 15) or 300 mg (n = 15) bid. At data cutoff (Dec 31, 2022), median follow-up was 35.4 months. The primary endpoint was reached, with a confirmed ORR of 70% (21/30) (200 mg, 80%; 300 mg, 60%). The median progression-free survival was 12.9 months (200 mg, 15.8 months; 300 mg, 10.7 months). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 73% (22/30) of the patients (200 mg: 60%; 300 mg: 87%). 59% (10/17) of the patients developed a T790M mutation at disease progression. The median overall survival was 33.7 months, and 34.1 months and 25.3 months in patient treated with or without osimertinib in a later-line setting, respectively.

Interpretation

AZD3759 showed promising efficacy and tolerable safety as a first-line therapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases. The 200-mg bid cohort had better clinical outcomes. Sequential use of AZD3759 and third-generation EGFR-TKIs represents a new option.

Funding

Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group (CTONG).

Furmonertinib, a Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Overcomes Multidrug Resistance through Inhibiting ABCB1 and ABCG2 in Cancer Cells

ATP-binding cassette transporters, including ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein) and ABCG2 (BCRP/MXR/ABCP), are pivotal in multidrug resistance (MDR) development in cancer patients undergoing conventional chemotherapy. The absence of approved therapeutic agents for multidrug-resistant cancers presents a significant challenge in effectively treating cancer. Researchers propose repurposing existing drugs to sensitize multidrug-resistant cancer cells, which overexpress ABCB1 or ABCG2, to conventional anticancer drugs. The goal of this study is to assess whether furmonertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor overcomes drug resistance mediated by ABCB1 and ABCG2 transporters. Furmonertinib stands out due to its ability to inhibit drug transport without affecting protein expression. The discovery of this characteristic was validated through ATPase assays, which revealed interactions between furmonertinib and ABCB1/ABCG2. Additionally, in silico docking of furmonertinib offered insights into potential interaction sites within the drug-binding pockets of ABCB1 and ABCG2, providing a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for the reversal of MDR by this repurposed drug. Given the encouraging results, we propose that furmonertinib should be explored as a potential candidate for combination therapy in patients with tumors that have high levels of ABCB1 and/or ABCG2. This combination therapy holds the potential to enhance the effectiveness of conventional anticancer drugs and presents a promising strategy for overcoming MDR in cancer treatment.

Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301

PURPOSE

Lazertinib is a potent, CNS-penetrant, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This global, phase III study (LASER301) compared lazertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion [ex19del]/L858R) locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were 18 years and older with no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Neurologically stable patients with CNS metastases were allowed. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to lazertinib 240 mg once daily orally or gefitinib 250 mg once daily orally, stratified by mutation status and race. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS

Overall, 393 patients received double-blind study treatment across 96 sites in 13 countries. Median PFS was significantly longer with lazertinib than with gefitinib (20.6 v 9.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58; P < .001). The PFS benefit of lazertinib over gefitinib was consistent across all predefined subgroups. The objective response rate was 76% in both groups (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6 to 24.9) with lazertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 10.9) with gefitinib. Overall survival data were immature at the interim analysis (29% maturity). The 18-month survival rate was 80% with lazertinib and 72% with gefitinib (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P = .116). Observed safety of both treatments was consistent with their previously reported safety profiles.

CONCLUSION

Lazertinib demonstrated significant efficacy improvement compared with gefitinib in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.

Novel systemic therapies in the management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-pretreated patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the standard first-line option for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring active EGFR mutations. The overall survival of patients with advanced NSCLC has improved dramatically with the development of comprehensive genetic profiles and targeted therapies. However, resistance inevitably occurs, leading to disease progression after approximately 10-18 months of EGFR-TKI treatment. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients who have experienced disease progression while undergoing EGFR-TKI treatment, but its efficacy is limited. The management of extensively pretreated patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC is becoming increasingly concerning. New agents have shown encouraging efficacy in clinical trials for this patient population, including fourth-generation EGFR-TKIs, EGFR-TKIs combined with counterpart targeted drugs, and novel agents such as antibody-drug conjugates. We review current efforts to manage extensively pretreated patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

A real-world study of the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib for patients with non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

BACKGROUND

Furmonertinib is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). A phase Ib study (FAVOUR, NCT04858958) initially demonstrated the efficacy of furmonertinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins). This study aimed to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of furmonertinib in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins having complete follow-up data, who were treated with furmonertinib from April 14, 2021, to March 15, 2022, at our institution and multiple hospitals in China. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed.

RESULTS

This study included 53 patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. A767_V769dup (28.3%) and S768_D770dup (11.3%) are the major variants. The ORR and DCR were 37.7% (20/53) and 92.5% (49/53), respectively. The 6-month PFS rate was 69.4% (95% CI 53.7-85.1%). The ORR of patients in the 240 mg once-daily dosage group was higher (42.9%) than that of patients in the 80 mg once-daily (25.0%) and 160 mg once-daily (39.5%) groups, but with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.816). The ORR of furmonertinib is not dependent on insertion location (P = 0.893). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases at baseline responded similarly to those without CNS metastases (ORR: 33.3% vs. 40.6%, P = 0.773). The most common AEs were diarrhea (26.4%) and rash (26.4%). No grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were observed. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of TRAEs between dosage groups (P = 0.271).

CONCLUSIONS

Furmonertinib has shown encouraging antitumor activity and CNS activity in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. Moreover, furmonertinib had a good safety profile and no dose-dependent toxicity.

Low‑dose anlotinib combined with EGFR‑TKI can be used as an alternative for EGFR‑TKI‑resistant non‑small cell lung cancer in elderly patients

The current treatment options for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer in the elderly with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance are limited. Although chemotherapy combined with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) in TKI-resistant patients, it often cannot be tolerated in elderly patients, leading to treatment failure. Anlotinib is a small molecule inhibitor made in China. The application of low-dose anlotinib in elderly patients with TKI-resistant lung cancer deserves further investigation. A total of 48 elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled to evaluate the efficacy of anlotinib combined with continuous EGFR-TKI vs. anlotinib monotherapy in patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. Anlotinib was administered at a dose of 6-8 mg per day, lower than the normal dose and known as a low dose, which is well tolerated in elderly patients. There were 25 cases in the combination group and 23 cases in the anlotinib monotherapy group. The primary endpoint of the present study was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate and toxicity. The median PFS (mPFS) was significantly longer in the combination group than that in the anlotinib monotherapy group: 6.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.35-7.65] compared with 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.38-4.62) (P=0.002). Analysis of the subgroups showed similar trends in results. The median OS was 32 months (95% CI, 22.04-41.96) in the combination group and 28 months (95% CI, 27.13-28.87) in the anlotinib monotherapy group (P=0.217). According to stratification analysis, second-line treatment with anlotinib combined with EGFR-TKI resulted in a better mPFS than third-line treatment (7.5 vs. 3.7 months, HR=3.477; 95% CI, 1.117-10.820; P=0.031). In the combination group, patients with gradual/local progression after EGFR-TKI failure had a longer mPFS than those with dramatic progression (7.5 vs. 6.0 months, HR=5.875; 95% CI, 1.414-10.460; P=0.015). Multivariate analyses showed that continuous EGFR-TKI combined with anlotinib after EGFR-TKI resistance was associated with longer PFS (P=0.019), whereas dramatic progression (P=0.014) had a detrimental effect on follow-up treatment. Grade 2 adverse events (AEs) were reported in four patients (17.39%) in the anlotinib monotherapy group and eight patients (32.00%) in the combination group. Of these, the most common grade 2 AEs were hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, paronychia, mucositis and transaminase elevation. There were no grade 3/4/5 AEs. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that low-dose anlotinib combined with EGFR-TKI is superior to anlotinib alone following EGFR-TKI failure, making it the preferred regimen for elderly patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for of advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in Asian populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: According to the 2023 guidelines for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line treatment and recently developed agents for the treatment of epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were compared in this meta-analysis. Treatment regimens involved in the included studies included first, second, and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), TKIs plus chemotherapy, TKIs plus angiogenesis inhibitors, and platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Considering the varying efficacy and safety of drugs in people of different ethnic origins, the optimal regimen should be determined, and the safety of first-line treatments should be assessed in the Asian population specifically. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched to retrieve reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with research data published from inception to 1 February 2023. Adopting Asian patient populations as the target (including studies in which Asian patients accounted for more than 50% of the sample), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted for comparison of treatment regimens and treatments were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: A total of 19 RCTs involving 5,824 patients and covering 14 treatment regimens were included. The primary outcome measure examined in this study was progression-free survival (PFS); other outcome measures examined were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), occurrence of any adverse events (AE), occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or above (≥3AE), and occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE). In terms of PFS, all regimens including TKIs (as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies), as well as bevacizumab (Bev) plus chemotherapy (Ch) were found to be significantly superior to basic chemotherapy (HRs: 0.09-0.61, p < 0.05 in all cases compared with Ch alone). The highest-ranking therapies were erlotinib (Erl) plus Bev (SUCRA: 0.94) and Erl plus ramucirumab (Ram) (SUCRA: 0.93). Regarding OS, no significant differences was observed between first-line treatment strategies; the top four treatments based on SUCRA, in rank order, were Bev + Ch (0.87), gefitinib (Gef) plus Ch (0.81), dacomitinib (Dac) (0.79), and osimertinib (Osi) (0.69). Additionally, there were no significant differences between first-line treatment strategies in terms of DCR. Regarding ORR, the top three treatments based on SUCRA were Erl + Bev (0.85), Erl + Ram (0.76), and Gef + Ch (0.74). No significant difference between first-line treatment strategies was observed in terms of the risk of AE. However, based on SUCRA, Erl ranked highest on avoidance of ≥ 3AE (0.97), and Osi ranked highest on avoidance of SAE (0.91). Conclusion: Based on these analyses of survival benefits, tumor burden response, and safety, furmonertinib (Fur), Osi, and aumolertinib (Aum) may represent the best treatment regimen options for Asian patients, significantly prolonging survival (as measured by median PFS/OS), eliciting a greater tumor burden response, and exposing patients to a lower risk of adverse events. Although Erl + Bev and Erl + Ram are associated with the best survival benefits in terms of PFS, further clinical studies are still needed to identify ways to reduce the risk of adverse events. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ID=CRD42023407994, identifier CRD42023407994.

Genomic characterisation of de novo EGFR copy number gain and its impact on the efficacy of first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation generally respond well to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, genomic characterisation of de novo EGFR copy number gain (CNG) and its impact on the efficacy of first-line EGFR-TKIs remains unclear.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective and real-world study included two cohorts that enroled EGFR mutant NSCLC patients. EGFR CNG was tested by next-generation sequencing of untreated tissue specimens. Cohort 1 detected the impact of EGFR CNG on first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment, and cohort 2 explored the genomic characterisation.

RESULTS

Cohort 1 enroled 355 patients from four cancer centres between January 2013 and March 2022. The patients were divided into three groups, included the EGFR non-CNG, EGFR CNG, and EGFR uncertain-CNG. No significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was found between the three groups (10.0 months vs. 10.8 months vs. 9.9 months, respectively, p = 0.384). Furthermore, the overall response rate was not statistically significant in the EGFR CNG group compared to the EGFR non-CNG or uncertain arm (70.3% vs. 63.2% vs. 54.5%, respectively, p = 0.154). Cohort 2 included 7876 NSCLC patients with 16.4% showing EGFR CNG. Gene mutations such as TP53, IKZF1, RAC1, MYC, MET, CDKN2A/B and alterations of the metabolic-related and ERK signalling pathway were significantly associated with patients with EGFR CNG compared to those without.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo EGFR CNG had no effect on the efficacy of first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in EGFR mutant NSCLC patients, and tumours with EGFR CNG had more complex genomic profiles than those without.

Efficacy of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor between unresectable stage III and stage IV EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

To compare survivals between unresectable stage III and stage IV EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Unresectable stage III and stage IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients were investigated from September 2012 to May 2022. Patients received EGFR-TKI as the first-line treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 558 patients were included: 478 (85.66%) patients were stage IV and 80 (14.34%) patients were stage III. Before PSM, stage III patients showed a better median PFS (15 vs. 13 months; P=0.026) and a similar median OS (29 vs. 30 months; P=0.820) compared to stage IV patients. Stage IV was an independent prognostic factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-2.04; P=0.021], but not for OS (HR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.77-1.60; P=0.560). After PSM, a better median PFS (15 vs. 12 months; P=0.016) and a similar median OS (29 vs. 30 months; P=0.960) were found between stage III and stage IV patients.

CONCLUSIONS

OS was similar between unresectable stage III and stage IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving EGFR-TKI as the first-line treatment.

Central nervous system efficacy of rezivertinib (BPI-7711) in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation: A pooled analysis of two clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which revealed the systematic and central nervous system (CNS) antitumor activities for EGFR T790M-mutated advanced NSCLC in previous clinical studies and is further analyzed here.

METHODS

Eligible patients from the previous phase I and phase IIb studies of rezivertinib were included for pooled analysis. Post-progressive patients who received a prescribed dosage (≥180 mg) of rezivertinib orally once daily were included in full analysis set (FAS), while those with stable, asymptomatic CNS lesions, including measurable and non-measurable ones at baseline were included in CNS full analysis set (cFAS). Patients with measurable CNS lesions were included in CNS evaluable for response set (cEFR). BICR-assessed CNS objective response rate (CNS-ORR), CNS disease control rate (CNS-DCR), CNS duration of response (CNS-DoR), CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), and CNS depth of response (CNS-DepOR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

355 patients were included in FAS, among whom 150 and 45 patients were included in cFAS and cEFR. This pooled analysis showed the CNS-ORR was 32.0% (48/150; 95% CI: 24.6-40.1%) and the CNS-DCR was 42.0% (63/150; 95% CI: 34.0-50.3%) in cFAS, while that in cEFR were 68.9% (31/45; 95% CI: 53.4-81.8%) and 100% (45/45; 95% CI: 92.1-100.0%). In cEFR, the median CNS-DepOR and the mean of CNS-DepOR were -52.0% (range: -100.0 to 16.1%) and -46.8% (95% CI: -55.5 to -38.1%). In cFAS, the median CNS-DoR and CNS-PFS were 13.8 (95% CI: 9.6-not calculable [NC]) and 16.5 (95% CI: 13.7-NC) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Rezivertinib demonstrated encouraging clinical CNS efficacy among advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation and CNS metastases.

First-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Plus Antiangiogenic Drugs Versus Third-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, despite significant survival improvement, the emergence of resistance mechanisms represents a common event. In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of third-generation EGFR-TKIs, the current standard of care, to first-generation EGFR-TKIs with antiangiogenic drugs for the first-line treatment of NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) reporting survival data published before September 1, 2022, were searched through the MEDLINE databases (PubMed), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (≥3 TRAEs) data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, with a total of 3,565 patients. We observed that third-generation EGFR-TKIs and first-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with antiangiogenic drugs provided a similar OS benefit over first-generation EGFR-TKIs in any of the subgroups. However, we indirectly observed a greater PFS benefit of third-generation EGFR-TKIs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs in females, never-smokers, in patients harboring exon 19 deletions, and in those with brain metastasis, as compared with using first-generation EGFR-TKIs plus antiangiogenic drugs. The ORR did not differ between the combination strategy and third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Finally, the risk of developing grade ≥3 TRAEs was higher using the combination of first-generation EGFR-TKIs and antiangiogenic drugs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs than third-generation EGFR-TKIs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that the combination strategy may provide an alternative to third-generation EGFR-TKIs, but more data are needed to determine the predictive clinicopathologic characteristics that can influence the treatment choice. Until then, third-generation EGFR-TKIs still represent the first choice in advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Central nervous system efficacy of furmonertinib (AST2818) in patients with EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis from two phase 2 studies

BACKGROUND

Furmonertinib (AST2818) is a brain penetrant pan-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting both EGFR sensitizing mutations and T790M mutation. We report the pooled central nervous system (CNS) efficacy data of furmonertinib in patients with EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from two phase 2 studies.

METHODS

This was a pooled, post-hoc analysis of two phase 2 studies (NCT03127449 [phase 2a study of furmonertinib], NCT03452592 [phase 2b study of furmonertinib]). In the phase 2a study, patients received furmonertinib 40 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, or 240 mg orally once daily. In the phase 2b study, all patients received furmonertinib 80 mg orally once daily. CNS efficacy of furmonertinib was analyzed in patients with baseline CNS lesions by an independent review center per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients with baseline CNS metastases were included in this analysis. In 52 patients with measurable CNS lesions, CNS objective response rates were zero (0/1), 65% (22/34), 85% (11/13), and 25% (1/4), and CNS disease control rates were zero (0/1), 97% (33/34), 100% (13/13), and 100% (4/4) in the 40 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, and 240 mg orally once daily group, respectively. In patients with measurable or non-measurable CNS lesions, median CNS progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-8.3), 11.6 months (95% CI 8.3-13.8), 19.3 months (95% CI 5.5-not available [NA]), and not reached (95% CI 2.8 months-NA) in the 40 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, and 240 mg orally once daily group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Furmonertinib showed promising CNS efficacy in doses of 80 mg orally once daily or higher in patients with EGFR T790M mutated NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Both studies were registered on ClinicalTrial.gov. The phase 2a study was registered with NCT03127449 on April 25, 2017; The phase 2b study was registered with NCT03452592 on March 2, 2018.