Efficacy and safety of the novel capsid inhibitor lenacapavir to treat multidrug-resistant HIV: week 52 results of a phase 2/3 trial

Advances in HIV Management During Pregnancy and Infant Feeding

Recent advances in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) management during pregnancy and infant feeding encompass several key elements: expanded HIV testing guidance; growing evidence of safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic data favoring the use of preferred antiretroviral therapy (ART) during pregnancy and breastfeeding; increasing advocacy for the inclusion of pregnant individuals with HIV in clinical trials to expedite access to new ART; and updated guidelines supporting shared decision-making for choice of infant feeding methods in people with HIV.

The Current Pipeline of Antiretroviral Therapy: Expanding Options and Filling Gaps

Highly effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care in the past 3 decades. 30 years ago, how many would have imagined that a single-tablet daily ART regimen containing different drug classes could achieve sustained HIV-1 suppression and halt disease progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)? Despite this remarkable achievement, challenges in HIV care remain that require further innovation for ART. In this review, we focus on newly approved antiretroviral agents and those undergoing phase 2/3 clinical trials. These new antiretrovirals hold great promise to expand treatment options and fill gaps in HIV care.

Current status of the small molecule anti-HIV drugs in the pipeline or recently approved

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is the causative agent of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) with high morbidity and mortality rates. Treatment of AIDS/HIV is being complicated by increasing resistance to currently used antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, mainly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to drug misuse, poor drug supply and poor treatment monitoring. However, progress has been made in the development of new ARV drugs, targeting different HIV components (Fig. 1). This review aims at presenting and discussing the progress made towards the discovery of new ARVs that are at different stages of clinical trials as of July 2024. For each compound, the mechanism of action, target biomolecule, genes associated with resistance, efficacy and safety, class, and phase of clinical trial are discussed. These compounds include analogues of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) - islatravir and censavudine; non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) - Rilpivirine, elsulfavirine and doravirine; integrase inhibitors namely cabotegravir and dolutegravir and chemokine coreceptors 5 and 2 (CC5/CCR2) antagonists for example cenicriviroc. Also, fostemsavir is being developed as an attachment inhibitor while lenacapavir, VH4004280 and VH4011499 are capsid inhibitors. Others are maturation inhibitors such as GSK-254, GSK3532795, GSK3739937, GSK2838232, and other compounds labelled as miscellaneous (do not belong to the classical groups of anti-HIV drugs or to the newer classes) such as obefazimod and BIT225. There is a considerable progress in the development of new anti-HIV drugs and the effort will continue since HIV infections has no cure or vaccine till now. Efforts are needed to reduce the toxicity of available drugs or discover new drugs with new classes which can delay the development of resistance.

A Narrative Review of Novel Agents for Managing Heavily Treatment-Experienced People Living With HIV

Objective: The objective of this review is to compare ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and lenacapavir, present the clinical trials evaluating each agent, and provide guidance on their use in highly-treatment experienced (HTE) population living with HIV (PWH). Data sources: A search of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov was conducted using the search terms: ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and lenacapavir. Study selection and data extraction: English-language, clinical publications were included. Data synthesis: Ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and lenacapavir, are each first-in-class agents, that have major differences in mechanism of action, route and frequency of administration, pharmacokinetic parameters, including elimination half-life, potential for drug-drug interactions, safety profiles, and cost. Each has been shown, when combined with an optimized background regimen (OBR) with at least one other active agent, to achieve virologic suppression in HTE-PWH. Conclusion: In HTE-patients, adding ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and/or lenacapavir to at least one other active agent can lead to virologic suppression in this difficult to treat population. Monotherapy with any of these agents is not recommended and will lead to a high likelihood of drug resistance. Selection of which agent(s) to include with an OBR will depend on other patient factors including concomitant medications, acceptance of formulations (oral vs. subcutaneous vs. intravenous infusion), and potential access (both insurance-based and transportation). Adherence to all agents in the regimen is paramount to successful outcomes.

Paediatric antiretroviral therapy challenges with emerging integrase resistance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Universal antiretroviral (ART) coverage and virological suppression are fundamental to ending AIDS in children by 2030. Availability of new paediatric dolutegravir (DTG)-based ART formulations is a major breakthrough and will undoubtedly help achieve this goal, but treatment challenges still remain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Paediatric formulations remain limited compared to those for adults, especially for young children, those unable to tolerate DTG or with DTG-based first-line ART failure. Tenofovir alafenamide is virologically superior to standard-of-care backbone drugs in second-line, but paediatric formulations are not widely available. The roles of resistance testing and recycling of backbone drugs following first-line ART failure remain to be determined. Results of trials of novel treatment strategies including dual therapy and long-acting agents are awaited. Although numbers are currently small, safe and effective ART options are urgently required for children developing DTG resistance.

SUMMARY

The antiretroviral treatment gap between adults and children persists. The potential benefits from rollout of new paediatric DTG-based fixed-dose combination ART for first-line treatment are considerable. However, children remain disadvantaged when DTG-based first-line ART fails or cannot be used. Research efforts to address this inequity require prioritisation in order to ensure health outcomes are optimised for all ages in all settings.

Antiviral Activity of Lenacapavir Against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 (HIV-2) Isolates and Drug-Resistant HIV-2 Mutants

The activity of lenacapavir against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) has been extensively evaluated in vitro, but comparable data for human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) are scarce. We determined the anti-HIV-2 activity of lenacapavir using single-cycle infections of MAGIC-5A cells and multicycle infections of a T-cell line. Lenacapavir exhibited low-nanomolar activity against HIV-2, but was 11- to 14-fold less potent against HIV-2 in comparison to HIV-1. Mutations in HIV-2 that confer resistance to other antiretrovirals did not confer cross-resistance to lenacapavir. Although lenacapavir-containing regimens might be considered for appropriate patients with HIV-2, more frequent viral load and/or CD4 testing may be needed to assess clinical response.

Case Series of People With HIV on the Long-Acting Combination of Lenacapavir and Cabotegravir: Call for a Trial

Background

Injectable cabotegravir (CAB)/rilpivirine (RPV) is the only combination long-acting (LA) antiretroviral regimen approved for HIV. RPV may not be effective among individuals with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance, which has >10% prevalence in many countries. Lenacapavir (LEN) is an LA capsid inhibitor given every 6 months, but has not been studied in combination with other LA agents.

Methods

We assembled a case series from 4 US academic medical centers where patients with adherence challenges were prescribed LEN subcutaneously every 26 weeks/CAB (+/- RPV) intramuscularly every 4 or 8 weeks. Descriptive statistics, including viral load (VL) outcomes, were summarized.

Results

All patients (n = 34: 76% male; 24% cis/trans female; 41% Black; 38% Latino/a; median age [range], 47 [28-75] years; 29% and 71% on CAB every 4 or 8 weeks) reported challenges adhering to oral ART. The reasons for using LEN/CAB with or without RPV were documented or suspected NNRTI mutations (n = 21, 59%), integrase mutations (n = 5, 15%), high VL (n = 6, 18%), or continued viremia on CAB/RPV alone (n = 4, 12%). Injection site reactions on LA LEN were reported in 44% (32% grade I, 12% grade 2). All patients but 2 (32/34; 94%) were suppressed (VL <75 copies/mL) after starting LEN at a median (range) of 8 (4-16) weeks, with 16/34 (47%) suppressed at baseline.

Conclusions

In this case series of 34 patients on LEN/CAB, high rates of virologic suppression (94%) were observed. Reasons for using LEN/CAB included adherence challenges and underlying resistance, mostly to NNRTIs. These data support a clinical trial of LEN/CAB among persons with NNRTI resistance.

Evolving mechanisms and presentations of cardiovascular disease in people with HIV: implications for management

People with HIV (PWH) are at elevated risk for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including myocardial infarction, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death, among other CVD manifestations. Chronic immune dysregulation resulting in persistent inflammation is common among PWH, particularly those with sustained viremia and impaired CD4+ T cell recovery. This inflammatory milieu is a major contributor to CVDs among PWH, in concert with common comorbidities (such as dyslipidemia and smoking) and, to a lesser extent, off-target effects of antiretroviral therapy. In this review, we discuss the clinical and mechanistic evidence surrounding heightened CVD risks among PWH, implications for specific CVD manifestations, and practical guidance for management in the setting of evolving data.

Erratum to: Progress Note 2024: Curing HIV; Not in My Lifetime or Just Around the Corner?

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.20411/pai.v8i2.665.].

Progress Note 2024: Curing HIV; Not in My Lifetime or Just Around the Corner?

Once a death sentence, HIV is now considered a manageable chronic disease due to the development of antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens with minimal toxicity and a high barrier for genetic resistance. While highly effective in arresting AIDS progression and rendering the virus untransmissible in people living with HIV (PLWH) with undetectable viremia (U=U) [1, 2]), ART alone is incapable of eradicating the "reservoir" of resting, latently infected CD4+ T cells from which virus recrudesces upon treatment cessation. As of 2022 estimates, there are 39 million PLWH, of whom 86% are aware of their status and 76% are receiving ART [3]. As of 2017, ART-treated PLWH exhibit near normalized life expectancies without adjustment for socioeconomic differences [4]. Furthermore, there is a global deceleration in the rate of new infections [3] driven by expanded access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), HIV testing in vulnerable populations, and by ART treatment [5]. Therefore, despite outstanding issues pertaining to cost and access in developing countries, there is strong enthusiasm that aggressive testing, treatment, and effective viral suppression may be able to halt the ongoing HIV epidemic (ie, UNAIDS' 95-95-95 targets) [6-8]; especially as evidenced by recent encouraging observations in Sydney [9]. Despite these promising efforts to limit further viral transmission, for PLWH, a "cure" remains elusive; whether it be to completely eradicate the viral reservoir (ie, cure) or to induce long-term viral remission in the absence of ART (ie, control; Figure 1). In a previous salon hosted by Pathogens and Immunity in 2016 [10], some researchers were optimistic that a cure was a feasible, scalable goal, albeit with no clear consensus on the best route. So, how are these cure strategies panning out? In this commentary, 8 years later, we will provide a brief overview on recent advances and failures towards identifying determinants of viral persistence and developing a scalable cure for HIV. Based on these observations, and as in the earlier salon, we have asked several prominent HIV cure researchers for their perspectives.

Rapid HIV-1 genotyping assay for the detection of capsid mutations

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) capsid is one of the most recent viral proteins successfully targeted for the development of antiretrovirals. Lenacapavir is a first in class HIV-1 capsid inhibitor that was recently approved for the treatment of highly treatment-experienced people with HIV in combination with other anti-HIV drugs. Owing to the novelty of the viral target, methods to characterize the potential resistance-associated mutations present in capsid upon treatment failure have not been fully established yet. Here, we describe a rapid and simple method to amplify capsid fragments and to determine their sequence from various clinical samples including diverse HIV-1 subtypes. These methods could easily be implemented in laboratories, including hospital laboratories often caring for this patient population.

Cross-resistance to entry inhibitors and lenacapavir resistance through Week 52 in study CAPELLA

BACKGROUND

Lenacapavir (LEN) is a first-in-class inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) capsid function for the treatment of heavily treatment-experienced people with HIV (PWH) harbouring multidrug resistance in combination with an optimized background regimen (OBR). Here, we describe in vitro analysis of the interplay between entry inhibitors (EI; enfuvirtide, fostemsavir, ibalizumab, and maraviroc) susceptibility and LEN susceptibility in samples from 72 participants in the phase 2/3 CAPELLA study, as well as the emergence of resistance in CAPELLA through 52 weeks.

METHODS

The phenotypic susceptibility to EIs of screening samples from participants was analysed using entry assays, and susceptibility to LEN was generated. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance to LEN was evaluated for subjects with virological failure through Week 52.

RESULTS

Overall, viruses with resistance to EIs showed no cross-resistance to LEN, with a mean fold change from wild type close to 1.0. Of the 22 participants analysed for resistance through Week 52, 9 participants (13%) had emergence of capsid resistance mutation(s) while the remaining 13 participants (18%) had no change in the capsid sequence.

CONCLUSION

The gag sequence from EI-resistant isolates did not affect LEN susceptibility. The lack of cross-resistance to LEN across ARV-resistant isolates supports the use of LEN in PWH regardless of their treatment history. During the second half-year period of the CAPELLA Study, development of LEN resistance was rare and was overall associated with functional LEN monotherapy due to either nonadherence or resistance-driven non-susceptibility to OBR.