Sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-arm, phase 1/2 study

High efficacy of azacitidine combined with homoharringtonine, idarubicin, and cytarabine in newly diagnosed patients with AML: A single arm, phase 2 trial

Introduction

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the novel combination of Aza and HIA as the frontline induction therapy in newly diagnosed AML patients eligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC) (registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04248595).

Methods

Aza (75mg/m2/d on days1-5 subcutaneous) is administered in combination with HIA [HHT 2mg/m2/d on days 4-8 intravenous over 3 hours, idarubicin 6mg/m2/d on days 4-6 intravenous, and cytarabine 100mg/m2/d on days 4-10 intravenous]. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 20 AML patients (aged 18-70 years) were enrolled between Jan 2020 and Sep 2022. 95% (19/20) of patients achieved CR/CRi, and 89.5% (17/19) had undetectable MRD, in which 94.7% (18/19) reached CR/CRi, and 88.9% (16/18) obtained MRD negative after the 1st cycle of induction therapy. Median OS and RFS were both not reached during the follow-up. The estimated 2-year OS and RFS were 87.5% (95%CI, 58.6% to 96.7%) and 87.1% (95%CI, 57.3% to 96.6%), respectively. No patient discontinued the treatment for AEs.

Discussion

This study provides preliminary evidence for this novel combination therapy as the first-line induction therapy for young or older AML patients fit for IC.

Lenalidomide Plus Decitabine Treatment in a Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patient With Deletion 5q and Excess Blasts

This is the first case of decitabine plus lenalidomide treatment for a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patient with 5q deletion (del(5q)) and elevated number of blasts. Upon bone marrow aspiration and biopsy with conventional cytogenetical studies she was diagnosed with MDS with del(5q) and refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB-1). Decitabine was started at a daily dose of 20 mg/m² 1 - 5 days and lenalidomide was started at daily doses of 10 mg 6 - 20 days a month. After two cycles, her hemoglobin level increased and transfusion dependency ceased. After four cycles, bone marrow aspiration showed blast ratio of < 5%. Decitabine and lenalidomide were applied for three more cycles. Decitabine was terminated after seven cycles and lenalidomide has been continued for 12 months. Latest blood values (February 2020) were as follows: white blood cells (WBCs) of 8,670/mm³, neutrophil count of 3,470/mm³, hemoglobin (Hb) level of 11.7 g/dL and platelet count of 203,000/mm³, and the patient continues to follow-up without treatment. In conclusion, combination of lenalidomide and decitabine seems to be an effective treatment modality without notable side effects in MDS patients with del(5q) and excess blasts. The efficacy of this combination should be validated with studies including large patient groups and with longer follow-up periods.

Immunosuppression and Immunotargeted Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia - The Potential Use of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination with Other Treatments

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy by using checkpoint inhibitors is now tried in the treatment of several malignancies, including Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). The treatment is tried both as monotherapy and as a part of combined therapy.

METHODS

Relevant publications were identified through literature searches in the PubMed database. We searched for (i) original articles describing the results from clinical studies of checkpoint inhibition; (ii) published articles describing the immunocompromised status of AML patients; and (iii) published studies of antileukemic immune reactivity and immunotherapy in AML.

RESULTS

Studies of monotherapy suggest that checkpoint inhibition has a modest antileukemic effect and complete hematological remissions are uncommon, whereas combination with conventional chemotherapy increases the antileukemic efficiency with acceptable toxicity. The experience with a combination of different checkpoint inhibitors is limited. Thalidomide derivatives are referred to as immunomodulatory drugs and seem to reverse leukemia-induced immunosuppression, but in addition, they have direct inhibitory effects on the AML cells. The combination of checkpoint targeting and thalidomide derivatives thus represents a strategy for dual immunotargeting together with a direct antileukemic effect.

CONCLUSION

Checkpoint inhibitors are now tried in AML. Experimental studies suggest that these inhibitors should be combined with immunomodulatory agents (i.e. thalidomide derivatives) and/or new targeted or conventional antileukemic treatment. Such combinations would allow dual immunotargeting (checkpoint inhibitor, immunomodulatory agents) together with a double/triple direct targeting of the leukemic cells.

Novel therapies in low- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms with diverse clinical courses. The revised version of the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) provides risk stratification into 5 different groups. Areas covered: For lower-risk patients, red blood cell transfusions and iron chelation are the backbone of supportive care. In addition, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) are used to ameliorate anemia. Lenalidomide is approved for the treatment of lower-risk patients with del(5q) who are transfusion-dependent. Patients with higher-risk disease should be offered allogeneic stem cell transplantation whenever possible. If they are unfit for transplantation or an appropriate donor cannot be found, hypomethylating agents may be used. Expert opinion: New therapeutic options for lower-risk patients include thrombopoietin analogues, the TGF-beta family ligand trapping drug Luspatercept, and the telomerase inhibitor Imetelstat. Combinations of hypomethylating agents (HMA) with other compounds, and inhibitors of bcl2, such as venetoclax are being developed for higher-risk patients. Finally, hypomethylating agents in combination with donor lymphocytes may lead to long-term remission following molecular or hematological relapse after allogeneic SCT.

A systematic review and metaanalysis of the efficacy and adverse events of azacitidinepluslenalidomide treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia 1

OBJECTIVES

The addition of lenalidomide (LEN) to azacitidine (AZA) may further improve the outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients as well as patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) patients although the evidence for this combination treatment is still relatively limited. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate efficacy and adverse effects of AZA plus LEN for the treatment of patients with high-risk MDS, AML or CMML.

METHODS

The current study systematically identified all cohort studies of patients with AML and/or MDS and/or CMML who received AZA in combination with LEN that reported the overall complete remission (CR) rate and/or overall response rate (ORR). A DerSimonian-d random-effects model with double arcsine transformation was used for the pooled rates and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the all outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies with 406 patients were identified and included into the meta-analysis. The pooled CR rate after the treatment with AZA-plus-LEN regimen was 33.0% (95% CI, 27.7%-38.7%, I² = 18%) while the pooled ORR was 49.9% (95% CI, 38.4%-61.5%, I² = 72%). Nonetheless, adverse events including grade 3-4 neutrophil toxicity events, platelet toxicity events and febrile neutropenia were common with AZA-plus-LEN regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study may serve as a preliminary data to suggest that the addition of LEN may offer incremental benefit to patients with high-risk MDS, AML and CMML. However, randomized-controlled studies that directly compare the efficacy and adverse events of AZA-plus-LEN regimen versus AZA monotherapy are still needed.

Azacitidine with or without lenalidomide in higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome & low blast acute myeloid leukemia

Standard treatment for higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and low blast acute myeloid leukemia is azacitidine. In single arm studies, adding lenalidomide had been suggested to improve outcomes. The ALLG MDS4 phase II trial randomized such patients to standard azacitidine or combination azacitidine (75mg/m²/d days 1 to 5) with lenalidomide (10mg days 1–21 of 28-day cycle from cycle 3) to assess clinical benefit (alive without progressive disease) at 12 months. A total of 160 patients were enrolled; median age 70.7 years (range 42.5-87.2), 31.3% female with 14% chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, 12% acute myeloid leukemia and 74% myelodysplastic syndromes. Adverse events were similar in both arms. There was excellent delivery of protocol therapy (median azacitidine cycles 11 both arms) with few dose reductions, delays or early cessations. At median follow up 33.1 months (range 0.7-59.5), the rate of clinical benefit at 12 months was 65% azacitidine arm and 54% lenalidomide+azacitidine arm (P=0.2). There was no difference in clinical benefit between each arm according to WHO diagnostic subgroup or IPSS-R. Overall response rate was 57% in azacitidine arm and 69% in lenalidomide+azacitidine (P=0.14). There was no difference in progression- free or overall survival between the arms (each P>0.12). Although the combination of lenalidomide and azacitidine was tolerable, there was no improvement in clinical benefit, response rates or overall survival in higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or low blast acute myeloid leukemia patients compared to treatment with azacitidine alone. This trial was registered at www.anzc-tr.org.au as ACTRN12610000271000.

Phase 1 dose escalation multicenter trial of pracinostat alone and in combination with azacitidine in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Pracinostat is a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumor activity in both solid tumor and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines. Pracinostat is reported to have modest clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Given the higher preclinical sensitivity of hematologic malignancies to pracinostat, the authors conducted a phase 1 study to assess the safety, maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of pracinostat in patients with advanced hematological malignancies.

METHODS

Pracinostat was administered orally 3 times a week for 3 weeks on a 28-day cycle. Patients were assigned to 7 dose levels using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were enrolled, 25 of whom had AML and 14 of whom had myelodysplastic syndrome. The maximum tolerated dose was 120 mg and the recommended phase 2 dose was 60 mg. Two patients with AML achieved a response: 1 complete remission (CR) and 1 complete cytogenetic response. Despite a dose-dependent increase in the plasma concentration of pracinostat, a similar increase in histone acetylation was not observed. As an extension, 10 additional patients with myelodysplastic syndrome were enrolled to assess the safety and efficacy of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine. Six patients achieved a CR and 3 achieved a CR without platelet recovery with no added toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrate that pracinostat is safe, with modest single-agent activity in patients with hematological malignancies. Cancer 2017;123:4851-9. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Lenalidomide: Myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q) and beyond

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with deletion 5q (del(5q)) is a distinct clinical and pathological disease subset that is exquisitely sensitive to lenalidomide for the treatment of red blood cell transfusion-dependent anemia. Although lenalidomide has erythropoeitic promoting activity in MDS without del(5q) (non-del(5q) MDS), the frequency of response to treatment is lower and relates to biologically separate drug effects. In del(5q) MDS, lenalidomide suppresses the malignant clone to restore effective erythropoiesis by virtue of synthetic lethality, arising from cereblon-dependent degradation of haplodeficient proteins encoded within the commonly deleted region of the chromosome 5q deletion. In contrast, in non-del(5q) MDS, lenalidomide restores effective erythropoiesis via enhancement of erythropoietin (EPO) receptor-initiated transcriptional response arising from the assembly of signaling-competent receptor complexes within membrane lipid raft domains. Recently, large phase III clinical studies have explored the role of lenalidomide, alone and in combination with, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents showing additive improvement in erythroid responses. Herein, we will describe the mechanisms of lenalidomide action in MDS and pivotal clinical studies testing the benefit of lenalidomide in both del(5q) and non-del(5q) MDS. Furthermore, we discuss evidence-based strategies to incorporate lenalidomide into the treatment algorithm for patients with MDS.

Azacitidine in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Azacitidine is recommended front-line treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not candidates for intensive treatment regimens, and was recently granted approval in the European Union for treatment of adult AML. Reviewed here is azacitidine experience in AML, including: mechanistic and pharmacokinetic data; safety and efficacy in controlled trials; treatment effects in AML subpopulations defined by disease characteristics; experience in unselected patients treated in the community setting; clinical outcomes relative to other approved AML therapies; and experience with azacitidine-based combination treatment regimens. Collectively, these data suggest that (a) azacitidine may prolong overall survival to a similar or greater extent than do other approved AML treatments, but with less toxicity, (b) azacitidine may be the preferred treatment option for older patients with unfavorable cytogenetics, and (c) experience and outcomes with azacitidine in the clinic are similar to those seen in clinical trials. Continued investigation of combination regimens on an azacitidine backbone is warranted.

Lenalidomide use in myelodysplastic syndromes: Insights into the biologic mechanisms and clinical applications

Myelosysplastic syndromes (MDS) include a heterogeneous group of clonal myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis leading to blood cytopenias and a variable risk of progression into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although the hypomethylating agent azacitidine prolongs survival among patients with higher risk (HR)-MDS compared with conventional care, no drug has been shown conclusively to prolong survival or delay progression to AML among patients with lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS). Lenalidomide is the drug with the most impressive clinical activity in the subset of anemic LR-MDS patients who harbor a deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (5q-), where it leads to high rates of transfusion independence and cytogenetic responses. Furthermore, lenalidomide delays progression to AML and prolongs survival among responders. In this article, we review the recently recognized mechanisms of action of lenalidomide and discuss the most recent clinical data regarding its use in patients with both 5q- MDS as well as non-5q- MDS. Finally, we forecast the future directions to improve the efficacy of lenalidomide in MDS with and without 5q-. Cancer 2017;123:1703-1713. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Targeted therapies in the treatment of adult acute myeloid leukemias: current status and future perspectives

The rapid advancement of next-generation sequencing techniques and the identification of molecular driver events responsible for leukemia development are opening the door to new pharmacologic-targeted agents to tailor treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in individual patients. However, the use of targeted therapies in AML has met with only modest success. Molecular studies have identified AML subsets characterized by driver mutational events, such as NPM1, FLT3-ITD and IDH1-2 mutations, and have provided preclinical evidence that the targeting of these mutant molecules could represent a valuable therapeutic strategy. Recent studies have provided the first pieces of evidence that FLT3 targeting in FLT3-mutant AMLs, IDH1/2 inhibition in IDH-mutant AMLs and targeting membrane molecules preferentially expressed on leukemic progenitor/stem cells, such as CD33 and CD123, represent a clinically valuable strategy.

Hypomethylating agent combination strategies in myelodysplastic syndromes: hopes and shortcomings

The hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine and decitabine are both approved by the FDA for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Although heralded as a significant advancement, HMA lead to responses in less than half of patients and for those that respond most will relapse. As such, there is a crucial need to improve frontline therapy approaches. One promising strategy involves combining azacitidine or decitabine with investigational or existing therapies with the goal of achieving synergistic activity and better patient outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to critically review the efficacy and safety of reported HMA-based combination regimens in patients with higher-risk MDS.