Methotrexate and temozolomide versus methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine for primary CNS lymphoma in an elderly population: an intergroup ANOCEF-GOELAMS randomised phase 2 trial

Myeloablative vs nonmyeloablative consolidation for primary central nervous system lymphoma: results of Alliance 51101

ABSTRACT

Although it is evident that standard-dose whole-brain radiotherapy as consolidation is associated with significant neurotoxicity, the optimal consolidative strategy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not defined. We performed a randomized phase 2 clinical trial via the US Alliance cancer cooperative group to compare myeloablative consolidation supported by autologous stem cell transplantation with nonmyeloablative consolidation after induction therapy for PCNSL. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to be initiated that eliminates whole-brain radiotherapy as a consolidative approach in newly diagnosed PCNSL. Patients aged 18 to 75 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1 manner to induction therapy (methotrexate, temozolomide, rituximab, and cytarabine) followed by consolidation with either thiotepa plus carmustine and autologous stem cell rescue vs induction followed by nonmyeloablative, infusional etoposide plus cytarabine. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 113 patients were randomized, and 108 (54 in each arm) were evaluable. More patients in the nonmyeloablative arm experienced progressive disease or death during induction (28% vs 11%; P = .05). Thirty-six patients received autologous stem cell transplant, and 34 received nonmyeloablative consolidation. The estimated 2-year PFS was higher in the myeloablative vs nonmyeloablative arm (73% vs 51%; P = .02). However, a planned secondary analysis, landmarked at start of the consolidation, revealed that the estimated 2-year PFS in those who completed consolidation therapy was not significantly different between the arms (86% vs 71%; P = .21). Both consolidative strategies yielded encouraging efficacy and similar toxicity profiles. This trial was registered at www.clininicals.gov as #NCT01511562.

The role of upfront lenalidomide maintenance for primary central nervous system lymphoma following first-line methotrexate treatment: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Consolidation therapy improves the duration of response among patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Lenalidomide maintenance has shown encouraging results in older patients with PCNSL. Herein, we performed a retrospective, single-center analysis to evaluate the effect of lenalidomide maintenance on the duration of response in patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL.

METHODS

Sixty-nine adult patients with PCNSL who achieved complete remission or partial remission (PR) after induction therapy were enrolled. The median age of patients was 58.0 years. The maintenance group (n = 35) received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day) for 21 days, every 28 days for 24 months; the observation group did not undergo any further treatment.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 32.6 months, the maintenance group experienced fewer relapse events. However, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between groups (36.1 vs. 30.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.446). Lenalidomide maintenance significantly improved PFS and overall survival (OS) only among patients who experienced PR after induction. The median duration of lenalidomide maintenance was 18 months; lenalidomide was well tolerated and minimally impacted the quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study was the first to evaluate lenalidomide maintenance as a frontline treatment among patients with PCNSL, PFS and OS did not improve, although the safety profile was satisfactory.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in older, fit patients with primary diffuse large B-cell CNS lymphoma (MARTA): a single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Available treatments for older patients with primary diffuse large B-cell CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) offer progression-free survival of up to 16 months. We aimed to investigate an intensified treatment of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in older patients with PCNSL.

METHODS

MARTA was a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study done at 15 research hospitals in Germany. Patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed, untreated PCNSL were enrolled if they had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and were fit for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT. Induction treatment consisted of two 21-day cycles of high-dose intravenous methotrexate 3·5 g/m2 (day 1), intravenous cytarabine 2 g/m2 twice daily (days 2 and 3), and intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 (days 0 and 4) followed by high-dose chemotherapy with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 (day -8), intravenous busulfan 3·2 mg/kg (days -7 and -6), and intravenous thiotepa 5 mg/kg (days -5 and -4) plus autologous HSCT. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 12 months in all patients who met eligibility criteria and started treatment. The study was registered with the German clinical trial registry, DRKS00011932, and recruitment is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 28, 2017, and Sept 16, 2020, 54 patients started induction treatment and 51 were included in the full analysis set. Median age was 71 years (IQR 68-75); 27 (53%) patients were female and 24 (47%) were male. At a median follow-up of 23·0 months (IQR 16·8-37·4), 23 (45%) of 51 patients progressed, relapsed, or died. 12-month progression-free survival was 58·8% (80% CI 48·9-68·2; 95% CI 44·1-70·9). During induction treatment, the most common grade 3-5 toxicities were thrombocytopenia and leukopenia (each in 52 [96%] of 54 patients). During high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT, the most common grade 3-5 toxicity was leukopenia (37 [100%] of 37 patients). Treatment-related deaths were reported in three (6%) of 54 patients, all due to infectious complications.

INTERPRETATION

Although the primary efficacy threshold was not met, short induction followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT is active in selected older patients with PCNSL and could serve as a benchmark for comparative trials.

FUNDING

Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation, Riemser Pharma, and Medical Center-University of Freiburg.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma involving the central nervous system: biologic rationale for targeted therapy

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma curable even in advanced stages. DLBCL involving the central nervous system (CNS) is more difficult to cure and fewer treatment options exist. Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) refers to aggressive lymphomas confined to the CNS, and are almost always DLBCL. Standard approaches for PCNSL use high-dose methotrexate-based combinations as induction therapy and younger patients often receive dose-intensive consolidation. However, dose-intensive therapies are not suitable for all patients, and older patients have fewer effective treatment options. Patients with relapsed or chemotherapy-refractory disease have a very poor prognosis. Secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) describes aggressive lymphomas involving the CNS at initial presentation or relapses within the CNS after treatment for systemic DLBCL. Isolated CNS relapse is often managed as PCNSL, but patients with synchronous involvement of DLBCL in both the periphery and the CNS pose a unique clinical challenge. Insights into the molecular circuitry of DLBCL have identified distinct genetic subtypes including cases with a predilection for CNS invasion. PCNSL and subsets of SCNSL are characterized by chronically activated B-cell receptor and NFκB signaling along with genetic evidence of immune evasion which may be exploited therapeutically. Improved mechanistic understanding of targetable pathways underpinning CNS lymphomas has led to numerous clinical trials testing targeted agent combinations and immunotherapy approaches with promising early results. Biologically rational strategies may further improve the cure rate of CNS lymphomas, either by overcoming intrinsic or acquired treatment resistance and/or by being broadly applicable to patients of all ages.

A Systematic Review of Cognitive Function, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze the effects of different treatments on cognitive functioning, anxiety, and depression in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in multiple databases including the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Sino Med, Wei Pu, Wan Fang, CNKI, and Google Scholar. The search included studies published through June 20, 2023, focusing on cognitive function, anxiety, and depression in adult patients newly diagnosed with PCNSL. Various measurement tools and scales were used to assess the primary outcomes. Descriptive systematic reviews were conducted to integrate the literature and summarize the effects of different treatment modalities on cognitive functioning, anxiety, and depression in PCNSL patients. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022370250).

RESULTS

A total of 43 studies were included. Induction chemotherapy was associated with improved cognitive function and reduced anxiety and depression in the majority of patients. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was found to lead to cognitive impairment, particularly in executive, attention, memory, and motor function. Low-dose WBRT, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) treatments did not result in significant cognitive impairment. Anxiety and depression were observed to decrease over the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the cognitive functioning, anxiety, and depression of patients with PCNSL can be improved with appropriate treatments. However, patients treated with WBRT are at a higher risk of cognitive decline compared to those receiving other treatment modalities. Therefore, special attention should be given to patients undergoing WBRT, and a comprehensive analysis should be conducted to reduce neurotoxicity and address early cognitive problems in these patients.

Central Nervous System Lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma and common manifestations of secondary CNS lymphoma.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Lymphoma can arise in the CNS de novo (primary CNS lymphoma) or as the result of systemic disease (secondary CNS lymphoma). Symptoms may include focal neurologic deficits related to the disease site, cognitive decline, and symptoms of increased intracranial pressure. Standard treatment may differ based on lymphoma subtype and location. A majority of CNS lymphoma is diffuse large B-cell subtype and exhibits aggressive behavior. First-line treatment is generally methotrexate-based polychemotherapy. Response rates to treatment are high, approximately 80% to 90% for primary CNS lymphoma, but relapse is common. Consolidation approaches including myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell rescue, nonmyeloablative chemotherapy, radiation, and medical maintenance regimens reduce rates of relapse. The recent development of targeted agents such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunomodulatory strategies have shown promise in the treatment of CNS lymphoma. Immunotherapy in the form of checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cells is being studied. More indolent forms of lymphoma may be treated with radiation or targeted therapy.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

CNS lymphoma is an uncommon but clinically meaningful manifestation of extranodal lymphoma. The diagnosis requires a high level of suspicion for rapid initiation of potentially curative treatment.

How I treat secondary CNS involvement by aggressive lymphomas

Secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (SCNSL) is a rare but clinically challenging scenario with historically disappointing outcomes. SCNSL refers to lymphoma that has spread into the CNS concurrently with systemic disease or CNS relapse during or after frontline immunochemotherapy, presenting with or without systemic lymphoma. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) denotes the most common entity, but an increased incidence is observed in other histologies, such as Burkitt lymphoma and mantle-cell lymphoma. The incidence, timing in disease course, location, evidence supporting the use of CNS prophylaxis, and treatment pathways vary according to histology. No randomized data exist to delineate the best treatment approaches with current recommendations based on retrospective and single-arm studies. However, a regimen comprising immunochemotherapy, incorporating agents that cross the blood-brain barrier, followed by thiotepa-containing conditioning and autologous stem-cell transplant outlined in the international MARIETTA study demonstrated improvement in outcomes, representing a major accomplishment in the care of patients with DLBCL with SCNSL. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell denotes a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with systemic aggressive lymphomas, with emerging data also demonstrating efficacy without higher neurotoxicity in those with SCNSL. In this manuscript we discuss 5 clinical scenarios and review the evidence supporting our recommendations.

Evidence-based management of primary and secondary CNS lymphoma

Central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma has traditionally had very poor outcomes however advances in management have resulted in dramatic improvements and long-term survival of patients. We describe the evidence for treatment strategies for these aggressive disorders. In primary CNS lymphoma there are randomized trial data to inform treatment decisions but these are lacking to guide management in secondary CNS lymphoma. Dynamic assessment of patient fitness and frailty is key throughout treatment, alongside delivery of CNS-bioavailable therapy and enrolment in clinical trials, at each stage of the disease. Intensive high-dose methotrexate-containing induction followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation with thiotepa-based conditioning is recommended for patients who are fit. Less intensive chemoimmunotherapy, novel agents (including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, cereblon targeting immunomodulatory agents, and checkpoint inhibitors in the context of clinical trials), and whole brain radiotherapy may be reserved for less fit patients or disease which is chemoresistant. Data regarding the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells therapy is emerging, and concerns regarding greater toxicity have not been realized. Future areas of prospective studies include the identification of those at high risk of developing CNS lymphoma, management in elderly or frail patients as well as incorporating novel agents into regimens, particularly for those with chemoresistant disease.

Evaluation of progression-free survival as a surrogate end point in primary CNS lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) as early surrogate endpoints for overall survival (OS) in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Library were searched up to 7 June 2022. Trial-level analyses were performed by weighted linear regression of logarithmic hazard ratios for PFS and OS. Treatment arm-level analyses were performed between PFS rates and 3- or 5-year OS rates. Results: 1471 PCNSL patients in nine randomized control trials were included. PFS was associated with OS (r = 0.750; 95% CI: 0.228-0.937). Strong linear correlations existed between 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS and 3-year OS (r = 0.896-0.928), moderate or weak correlations existed between 3- to 6-month PFS and 3-year OS, 3-month to 5-year PFS and 5-year OS. Conclusion: Short-term PFS can validly substitute for long-term OS in PCNSL.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) in older patients

INTRODUCTION

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare, chemo and radio-sensitive tumor limited to the central nervous system. The incidence of PCSNL increases notably in the elderly population which represented approximately half of the patients. The limit of 'elderly' population remained debated and nonuniform, including 60 years as a cutoff for brain radiotherapy, 65 years for autologous stem-cell transplantation, and 70 years for the last clinical trials. Current therapeutic options include first line treatment based on high-dose methotrexate based polychemotherapy, consolidation chemotherapy, and adapted autologous stem cell transplantation for highly selected patients. At relapse, single agent targeted therapies or salvage chemotherapy followed by intensive consolidation are promising therapeutic options. Nevertheless, improving management of elderly patients is an urgent medical need that currently remains unresolved.

OBJECTIVE

We will focus on elderly patients with PCNSL and their specificities including clinical presentations, available therapeutic options and adaptations to be made.

CONCLUSION

To improve survival, it will be necessary to personalized and adapt the treatments, to each patient and his comorbidities, to increase their effectiveness and limit their toxicity in this frail population. Finally, inclusion of these patients in clinical trials is one of the major challenges to significantly change PCNSL elderly patient prognosis.

Age-adjusted high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation or conventional chemotherapy with R-MP as first-line treatment in elderly primary CNS lymphoma patients - the randomized phase III PRIMA-CNS trial

BACKGROUND

Older primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients have an inferior prognosis compared to younger patients because available evidence on best treatment is scarce and treatment delivery is challenging due to comorbidities and reduced performance status. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) after high-dose methotrexate (MTX)-based immuno-chemotherapy has become an increasingly used treatment approach in eligible elderly PCNSL patients with promising feasibility and efficacy, but has not been compared with conventional chemotherapy approaches. In addition, eligibility for HCT-ASCT in elderly PCNSL is not well defined. Geriatric assessment (GA) may be helpful in selecting patients for the best individual treatment choice, but no standardized GA exists to date. A randomized controlled trial, incorporating a GA and comparing age-adapted HCT-ASCT treatment with conventional chemotherapy is needed.

METHODS

This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial with two parallel arms will recruit 310 patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL > 65 years of age in 40 centers in Germany and Austria. The primary objective is to demonstrate that intensified chemotherapy followed by consolidating HCT-ASCT is superior to conventional chemotherapy with rituximab, MTX, procarbazine (R-MP) followed by maintenance with procarbazine in terms of progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), (neuro-)toxicity and quality of life (QoL). GA will be conducted at specific time points during the course of the study. All patients will be treated with a pre-phase rituximab-MTX (R-MTX) cycle followed by re-assessment of transplant eligibility. Patients judged transplant eligible will be randomized (1:1). Patients in arm A will be treated with 3 cycles of R-MP followed by maintenance therapy with procarbazine for 6 months. Patients in arm B will be treated with 2 cycles of MARTA (R-MTX/AraC) followed by busulfan- and thiotepa-based HCT-ASCT.

DISCUSSION

The best treatment strategy for elderly PCNSL patients remains unknown. Treatments range from palliative to curative but more toxic therapies, and there is no standardized measure to select patients for the right treatment. This randomized controlled trial will create evidence for the best treatment strategy with the focus on developing a standardized GA to help define eligibility for an intensive treatment approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German clinical trials registry DRKS00024085 registered March 29, 2023.

Central nervous system lymphomas-Assessment and treatment and prevention of central nervous system relapse

In this review focused on lymphoma and the central nervous system (CNS), we summarize recent developments in the management of primary (PCNSL) and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL), treatment of CNS lymphoma in the older population, the neuroradiological assessment of CNS lymphoma and finally highlight the ongoing debate on optimal CNS prophylaxis. The section on PCNSL focuses on the different approaches available for frontline treatment in Europe and the United States and discusses consolidation strategies. We then highlight available strategies to treat PCNSL in the elderly population, an area of unmet need. New therapies aiming at minimizing toxicity and prioritizing quality of life are emerging for these patients. Secondary CNS lymphoma, especially in the relapsed/refractory setting is another area of unmet need, and the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy is being explored. We provide an overview of the imaging challenges in the neuroradiological assessment of CNS lymphoma. Finally, the section on CNS prophylaxis summarizes recent findings from large retrospective studies challenging the efficacy of present approaches to prophylaxis in higher-risk patients with lymphoma.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a diffuse large B cell lymphoma in which the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges and/or eyes are exclusive sites of disease. Pathophysiology is incompletely understood, although a central role seems to comprise immunoglobulins binding to self-proteins expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and alterations of genes involved in B cell receptor, Toll-like receptor and NF-κB signalling. Other factors such as T cells, macrophages or microglia, endothelial cells, chemokines, and interleukins, probably also have important roles. Clinical presentation varies depending on the involved regions of the CNS. Standard of care includes methotrexate-based polychemotherapy followed by age-tailored thiotepa-based conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation and, in patients unsuitable for such treatment, consolidation with whole-brain radiotherapy or single-drug maintenance. Personalized treatment, primary radiotherapy and only supportive care should be considered in unfit, frail patients. Despite available treatments, 15-25% of patients do not respond to chemotherapy and 25-50% relapse after initial response. Relapse rates are higher in older patients, although the prognosis of patients experiencing relapse is poor independent of age. Further research is needed to identify diagnostic biomarkers, treatments with higher efficacy and less neurotoxicity, strategies to improve the penetration of drugs into the CNS, and roles of other therapies such as immunotherapies and adoptive cell therapies.

Challenges in the management of primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Stereotactic biopsy remains the gold standard for the pathological diagnosis of PCNSL. However, certain new auxiliary diagnostic methods are considered to have good application prospects; these include cytokine and tumor circulating DNA, among others. Although new drugs such as immunomodulators, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors have brought hope owing to their improved efficacy, the high recurrence rate and subsequent high mortality remain barriers to long-term survival. Increasing emphasis is therefore being placed on consolidation treatments. Consolidation treatment strategies include whole brain radiotherapy, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and non-myeloablative chemotherapy. As studies directly comparing the effectiveness and safety of different consolidation treatment schemes are lacking, the optimal consolidation strategy remains uncertain. This article will review the diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL, focusing on the progress in research pertaining to consolidation therapy.

Older patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: Survival and prognostication across 20 U.S. cancer centers

There is a paucity of large-scale data delineating outcomes and prognostication of older patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). We retrospectively analyzed 539 newly-diagnosed PCNSL patients ages ≥60 years across 20 U.S. academic centers. The median age was 70 years (range 60-88); at least one geriatric syndrome was present in 46%; the median Cumulative Index Ratings Scale-Geriatrics (CIRS-G) score was 6 (range, 0-27); and 36% had impairment in activities of daily living (ADL). The most common induction regimens were high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) ± rituximab; methotrexate, temozolomide, rituximab (MTR); and rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine (R-MPV). Overall, 70% of patients achieved remission, with 14% undergoing consolidative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and 24% receiving maintenance. With 58-month median follow-up, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 17 months (95% CI 13-22 months) and 43 months (95% CI 31-56 months), respectively. Three-year PFS and OS were highest with MTR (55% and 74%, respectively). With single-agent methotrexate ± rituximab, 3-year PFS and OS were 30% (p = .0002) and 47% (p = .0072). On multivariate analysis, increasing age at diagnosis and Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was associated with inferior PFS; age, hypoalbuminemia, higher CIRS-G score, and ECOG PS adversely affected OS. Among patients receiving maintenance, 3-year PFS was 65% versus 45% without maintenance (p = 0.02), with 3-year OS of 84% versus 61%, respectively (p = .0003). Altogether, outcomes in older PCNSL patients appeared optimized with HD-MTX combination induction regimens and maintenance therapy. Furthermore, several prognostic factors, including geriatric measures, were associated with inferior outcomes.

Management of primary and secondary CNS lymphoma

Central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma has traditionally had very poor outcomes however advances in management have seen dramatic improvements and long-term survival of patients. In primary CNS lymphoma there are now randomised trial data to inform practice, however secondary CNS lymphoma has a lack of randomised trial data and CNS prophylaxis remains a contentious area. We describe treatment strategies in these aggressive disorders. Dynamic assessment of patient fitness and frailty is key throughout treatment alongside delivery of CNS-bioavailable therapy and enrolment in clinical trials. Intensive high-dose methotrexate-containing induction followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is preferred for patients who are fit. Less intensive chemoimmunotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy and novel therapies may be reserved for patients unfit or chemoresistant. It is essential to better define patients at increased risk of CNS relapse, as well as effective prophylactic strategies to prevent it. Future prospective studies incorporating novel agents are key.

Multidrug chemotherapy, whole-brain radiation and cytarabine therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma in elderly patients with dose modification based on geriatric assessment: study protocol for a phase II, multicentre, non-randomised study

INTRODUCTION

Multidrug chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab, high-dose methotrexate, procarbazine and vincristine (R-MPV) is a standard therapy for younger patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL); however, prospective data regarding its use in elderly patients are lacking. This multi-institutional, non-randomised, phase II trial will assess the efficacy and safety of R-MPV and high-dose cytarabine (HD-AraC) for geriatric patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Forty-five elderly patients will be included. If R-MPV does not achieve complete response, the patients will undergo reduced-dose, whole-brain radiotherapy comprising 23.4 Gy/13 fractions, followed by local boost radiotherapy comprising 21.6 Gy/12 fractions. After achieving complete response using R-MPV with or without radiotherapy, the patients will undergo two courses of HD-AraC. All patients will undergo baseline geriatric 8 (G8) assessment before HD-AraC and after three, five and seven R-MPV courses. Patients with screening scores of ≥14 points that decrease to <14 points during subsequent treatment, or those with screening scores <14 points that decrease from the baseline during subsequent treatment are considered unfit for R-MPV/HD-AraC. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, treatment failure-free survival and frequency of adverse events. The results will guide a later phase III trial and provide information about the utility of a geriatric assessment for defining chemotherapy ineligibility.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study complies with the latest Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained. All participants can quit the study without penalty or impact on treatment. The protocol for the study, statistical analysis plan and informed consent form have been approved by the Certified Review Board at Hiroshima University (CRB6180006) (approval number: CRB2018-0011). The study is ongoing within nine tertiary and two secondary hospitals in Japan. The findings of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCTs061180093.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and the treatment of primary CNS lymphoma

This review focuses on the recent progress in the management of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Multiomic analyses allowed to better understand the tumorigenesis of PCNSL and to establish a molecular classification with prognostic value that will optimize patient management and guide future targeted approaches. Cooperative clinical trials have demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy, in selected fit patients, of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation as post-induction consolidation, that will progressively replace whole brain radiotherapy associated with a much higher risk of delayed neurotoxicity. Several novel treatments have shown efficacy and overall good tolerance in PCNSL patients, such as Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, imids, immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T). This opens promising therapeutic perspectives to improve the current standard treatment, especially for elderly and unfit patients who represent a growing population.

Long term outcomes in older patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: an analysis of the Texas Cancer Registry

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that carries a poor prognosis in the elderly. The aim of this study is to investigate treatment patterns and survival trends in patients ≥ 65 years with PCNSL through data provided by the Texas Cancer Registry. Adults ≥ 65 years diagnosed with PCNSL and followed between 1995-2017 were identified and separated into three eras: 1995-2003, 2004-2012, and 2013-2017. Baseline covariates compared included patient demographics and treatments administered. Pearson's chi-squared test and Cox proportional hazard models compared covariates; overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed via Kaplan-Meier methodology. There were 375 patients; 104 (27.7%) in 1995-2003, 146 (38.9%) in 2004-2012, and 125 (33.3%) in 2013-2017. There were 50 (48.1%), 55 (37.7%), and 31 (24.8%) in 1995-2003, 2004-2012, and 2013-2017, respectively, that did not receive treatment. At last follow up, 101 (97.1%), 130 (89.0%), and 94 (75.2%) in each era died, of which 89 (85.6%), 112 (76.7%), and 70 (56.0%) were attributed to PCNSL. Median OS per era was eight (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.06-10.93), six (95% CI, 2.30-9.69), and five months (95% CI, 2.26-7.73) (p = 0.638). DSS per era was nine (95% CI: 0.00, 26.53), 10 (95% CI: 5.14, 14.86), and 19 (95% CI, 0.00-45.49) (p = 0.931) months. Spinal cord as primary disease site (HR: 0.668 [95% CI, 0.45-0.99], p = 0.049), and chemotherapy (HR 0.532 [95% CI, 0.42-0.673], p =  < 0.001) or chemotherapy + radiation (HR, 0.233 [95% CI, 0.11-0.48] p < 0.001) had better outcomes compared to no therapy or radiation therapy alone. Survival in older patients ≥ 65 with PCNSL has not improved per our analysis of the TCR from 1995-2017 despite increasing trends of treatment utilization. Strategies to augment recruitment of older individuals in trials are needed in order to determine who would derive treatment benefit and minimize treatment toxicities.

A Systematic Review of High-Dose Methotrexate for Adults with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is confined within the CNS. Due to its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is the backbone for induction chemotherapy. This systematic review was conducted to observe outcomes among different HDMTX doses (low, <3 g/m²; intermediate, 3-4.9 g/m²; high, ≥5 g/m²) and regimens used in the treatment of PCNSL. A PubMed search resulted in 26 articles reporting clinical trials using HDMTX for PCNSL, from which 35 treatment cohorts were identified for analysis. The median dose of HDMTX used for induction was 3.5 g/m² (interquartile range IQR, 3-3.5); the intermediate dose was most frequently used in the studies examined (24 cohorts, 69%). Five cohorts used HDMTX monotherapy, 19 cohorts used HDMTX + polychemotherapy, and 11 cohorts used HDMTX + rituximab ± polychemotherapy. Pooled overall response rate (ORR) estimates for low, intermediate, and high dose HDMTX cohorts were 71%, 76%, and 76%, respectively. Pooled 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) estimates for low, intermediate, and high HDMTX dose cohorts were 50%, 51%, and 55%, respectively. Regimens that included rituximab showed a tendency to have higher ORR and 2-year PFS than those that did not include rituximab. These findings indicate that current protocols utilizing 3-4 g/m² of HDMTX in combination with rituximab provide therapeutic efficacy in PCNSL.

Is CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy a smart strategy to combat central nervous system lymphoma?

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare form and aggressive type of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that occurs in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised adults. While adding rituximab to chemotherapeutic regimens resulted in dramatic improvement in both progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with non-central nervous system (CNS) DLBCL, the outcomes of PCNSL are generally poor due to the immune-privileged tumor microenvironment or suboptimal delivery of systemic agents into tumor tissues. Therefore, more effective therapy for PCNSL generally requires systemic therapy with sufficient CNS penetration, including high-dose intravenous methotrexate with rituximab or high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. However, overall survival is usually inferior in comparison to non-CNS lymphomas, and treatment options are limited for elderly patients or patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has emerged as a cutting-edge cancer therapy, which led to recent FDA approvals for patients with B-cell malignancies and multiple myeloma. Although CAR-T cell therapy in patients with PCNSL demonstrated promising results without significant toxicities in some small cohorts, most cases of PCNSL are excluded from the pivotal CAR-T cell trials due to the concerns of neurotoxicity after CAR-T cell infusion. In this review, we will provide an overview of PCNSL and highlight current approaches, resistance mechanisms, and future perspectives of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with PCNSL.

European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL)

The management of primary central nervous system (PCNSL) is one of the most controversial topics in neuro-oncology because of the complexity of the disease and the limited number of controlled studies available. In 2021, given recent advances and the publication of practice-changing randomized trials, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) created a multidisciplinary task force to update the previously published evidence-based guidelines for immunocompetent adult patients with PCNSL and added a section on immunosuppressed patients. The guideline provides consensus considerations and recommendations for the treatment of PCNSL, including intraocular manifestations and specific management of the elderly. The main changes from the previous guideline include strengthened evidence for the consolidation with ASCT in first-line treatment, prospectively assessed chemotherapy combinations for both young and elderly patients, clarification of the role of rituximab even though the data remain inconclusive, of the role of new agents, and the incorporation of immunosuppressed patients and primary ocular lymphoma. The guideline should aid the clinicians in everyday practice and decision making and serve as a basis for future research in the field.

Primary CNS lymphoma: update on molecular pathogenesis and therapy

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive form of extra-nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma that as a brain tumor poses a unique set of challenges in diagnosis and management. With the advent of next-generation sequencing, we review updates in the understanding of its molecular and genomic pathogenesis. We also highlight key issues in management, with a focus on emerging technologies and new biological therapies including monoclonal antibodies, IMiDs, BTK inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors, and CAR-T therapy. Integration of these approaches will likely enhance induction and consolidation strategies to suppress NF-κB activation and the anti-tumor immune response, while minimizing the often noxious effects of genotoxic approaches.

Primary CNS Lymphoma: Progress With Dose-Intensive Consolidation

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Randomized phase III study of high-dose methotrexate and whole-brain radiotherapy with/without temozolomide for newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: JCOG1114C

BACKGROUND

The goal was to determine whether the addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to the standard treatment of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) improves survival.

METHODS

An open-label, randomized, phase III trial was conducted in Japan, enrolling immunocompetent patients aged 20-70 years with histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed PCNSL. After administration of HD-MTX, patients were randomly assigned to receive WBRT (30 Gy) ± 10 Gy boost (arm A) or WBRT ± boost with concomitant and maintenance TMZ for two years (arm B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between September 29, 2014 and October 15, 2018, 134 patients were enrolled, of whom 122 were randomly assigned and analyzed. At the planned interim analysis, two-year OS was 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.5-94.0%) in arm A and 71.4% (56.0-82.2%) in arm B. The hazard ratio was 2.18 (95% CI: 0.95 to 4.98), with the predicted probability of showing the superiority of arm B at the final analysis estimated to be 1.3%. The study was terminated early due to futility. O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status was measured in 115 tumors, and it was neither prognostic nor predictive of TMZ response.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to demonstrate the benefit of concomitant and maintenance TMZ in newly diagnosed PCNSL.

Treatment Options for Recurrent Primary CNS Lymphoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) constitutes a rare extranodal variant of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with an annual incidence of 0.45/100,000. Given the paucity of large prospective clinical trials, there is no consensus treatment for refractory or relapsed (r/r) PCNSL, and available strategies are largely based on retrospective analyses. Patient age, performance status, previously administered treatment, duration of response, and molecular characteristics guide selection of salvage therapy. Patients with a good performance status (KPS >70), particularly ≤65 years, and adequate organ function should be considered for salvage polychemotherapy. Based on its high overall response rate even in the relapsed setting, we choose high-dose (≥ 3.5g/m²) methotrexate (HD-MTX) based regimens, e.g., R-MPV (rituximab, HD-MTX, procarbazine, and vincristine), for remission re-induction as long as patients were sensitive to first line HD-MTX-based regimens, especially when duration of previous response was ≥ 1 year. Following successful remission induction, we choose myeloablative chemotherapy (e.g., thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide) and subsequent autologous stem cell transplant in curative intent whenever feasible. Alternatively, conventional chemotherapy regimens (for example, monthly HD-MTX) or low-dose whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) are selected for consolidation in non-transplant candidates in complete remission. In cases of HD-MTX refractory disease or contraindications, we use pemetrexed; temozolomide/rituximab; high-dose cytarabine; or whole brain radiation for remission induction. Clinical trial participation is considered as well. Emerging therapies for upfront or salvage therapy under ongoing investigation include bruton tyrosine kinase inhibition (e.g., ibrutinib), immunomodulatory drugs (e.g., lenalidomide), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI, e.g., nivolumab), and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy.

Prognostic factors in primary central nervous system lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive extranodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Despite its apparent immunopathological homogeneity, PCNSL displays a wide variability in outcome. Identifying prognostic factors is of importance for patient stratification and clinical decision-making. The purpose of this review is to focus on the clinical, neuroradiological and biological variables correlated with the prognosis at the time of diagnosis in immunocompetent patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Age and performance status remain the most consistent clinical prognostic factors. The current literature suggests that neurocognitive dysfunction is an independent predictor of poor outcome. Cumulating data support the prognostic value of increased interleukin-10 level in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), in addition to its interest as a diagnostic biomarker. Advances in neuroimaging and in omics have identified several semi-quantitative radiological features (apparent diffusion restriction measures, dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI (pMRI) pattern and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose metabolism) and molecular genetic alterations with prognostic impact in PCNSL.

SUMMARY

Validation of new biologic and neuroimaging markers in prospective studies is required before integrating future prognostic scoring systems. In the era of radiomic, large clinicoradiological and molecular databases are needed to develop multimodal artificial intelligence algorithms for the prediction of accurate outcome.

Evidence-based expert consensus on the management of primary central nervous system lymphoma in China

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a type of central nervous system restricted non-Hodgkin lymphoma, whose histopathological diagnosis is majorly large B cell lymphoma. To provide specific, evidence-based recommendations for medical professionals and to promote more standardized, effective and safe treatment for patients with PCNSL, a panel of experts from the Chinese Neurosurgical Society of the Chinese Medical Association and the Society of Hematological Malignancies of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association jointly developed an evidence-based consensus. After comprehensively searching literature and conducting systematic reviews, two rounds of Delphi were conducted to reach consensus on the recommendations as follows: The histopathological specimens of PCNSL patients should be obtained as safely and comprehensively as possible by multimodal tomography-guided biopsy or minimally invasive surgery. Corticosteroids should be withdrawn from, or not be administered to, patients with suspected PCNSL before biopsy if the patient's status permits. MRI (enhanced and DWI) should be performed for diagnosing and evaluating PCNSL patients where whole-body PET-CT be used at necessary time points. Mini-mental status examination can be used to assess cognitive function in the clinical management. Newly diagnosed PCNSL patients should be treated with combined high-dose methotrexate-based regimen and can be treated with a rituximab-inclusive regimen at induction therapy. Autologous stem cell transplantation can be used as a consolidation therapy. Refractory or relapsed PCNSL patients can be treated with ibrutinib with or without high-dose chemotherapy as re-induction therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery can be used for PCNSL patients with a limited recurrent lesion who were refractory to chemotherapy and have previously received whole-brain radiotherapy. Patients with suspected primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) should be diagnosed by vitreous biopsy. PVRL or PCNSL patients with concurrent VRL can be treated with combined systemic and local therapy.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extranodal lymphomatous malignancy that affects the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges, or vitreoretinal space, without evidence of systemic involvement. The diagnosis of PCNSL requires a high level of suspicion because clinical presentation varies depending upon involved structures. Initiation of treatment is time sensitive for optimal neurologic recovery and disease control. In general, the prognosis of PCNSL has improved significantly over the past few decades, largely as a result of the introduction and widespread use of high-dose methotrexate (MTX) chemotherapy, which is considered the backbone of first-line polychemotherapy treatment. Upon completion of MTX-based treatment, a consolidation strategy is often required to prolong duration of response. Consolidation can consist of radiation, maintenance therapy, nonmyeloablative chemotherapy, or myeloablative treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplant. Unfortunately, even with consolidation, relapse is common, and 5-year survival rates stand at only 30% to 40%. Novel insights into the pathophysiology of PCNSL have identified key mechanisms in tumor pathogenesis, including activation of the B-cell receptor pathway, immune evasion, and a suppressed tumor immune microenvironment. These insights have led to the identification of novel small molecules targeting these aberrant pathways. The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib and immunomodulatory drugs (lenalidomide or pomalidomide) have shown promising clinical response rates for relapsed/refractory PCNSL and are increasingly used for the treatment of recurrent disease. This review provides a discussion of the clinical presentation of PCNSL, the approach to work-up and staging, and an overview of recent advancements in the understanding of the pathophysiology and current treatment strategies for immunocompetent patients.

A prospective cohort study of methotrexate plus idarubicin in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma

PURPOSE

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based chemotherapy regimen is the first-line option for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of HD-MTX plus idarubicin (IDA) in patients with newly diagnosed immunocompetent PCNSL.

METHODS

We recruited newly diagnosed PCNSL patients from January 2017 to August 2020. Patients were assigned into two groups: HD-MTX monotherapy and HD-MTX plus IDA (HD-MTX/IDA). In the HD-MTX monotherapy group, patients were treated with MTX 8 g/m² alone on day 1, while the HD-MTX/IDA group received MTX 8 g/m² on day 1 and IDA 10 mg/m² on day 2. Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks for 8 cycles except for progression and/or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

We recruited 61 PCNSL patients, including 36 in the HD-MTX and 25 in the HD-MTX/IDA group. The CR rate was 68% in the HD-MTX/IDA group and 72.22% of patients in the HD-MTX monotherapy group (p = 0.7221), while the overall response rate was 72% vs. 77.78% (p = 0.6063). Median PFS in HD-MTX/IDA group and HD-MTX monotherapy group were 15.6 months and 18.5 months, respectively (p = 0.6374). Median OS was not reached in both groups. There were no significant differences in adverse effects between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of IDA with HD-MTX showed no obvious therapeutic advantage over HD-MTX monotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with PCNSL. HD-MTX dose of 8 g/m² monotherapy can still provide better therapeutic benefits in patients with acceptable adverse effects. Future studies could explore HD-MTX in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in the first-line treatment of PCNSL.

Efficacy and toxicity with radiation field designs and concurrent temozolomide for CNS lymphoma

Background

There is no consensus on the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma refractory to first-line methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is sometimes used but may result in unacceptable neurocognitive dysfunction. We examined the efficacy and toxicities of WBRT with or without concurrent temozolomide in CNS lymphoma treatment.

Methods

This single-institution IRB-approved retrospective study included adults with CNS lymphoma who received WBRT, either consolidative low-dose WBRT alone or low-dose WBRT with a focal boost to residual disease and were previously treated with high-dose methotrexate. The relationships between the WBRT regimen, concurrent temozolomide, and clinical outcomes and toxicities were assessed using proportional hazards and logistic regression models.

Results

A total of 45 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 24–74) treated from 2004 to 2019 were included. In total, 20 patients received concurrent temozolomide. In the WBRT + Boost cohort (n = 32), concurrent temozolomide resulted in better 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) (73% OS and 66% PFS) compared to patients treated without concurrent temozolomide (44% OS and 24% PFS). On multivariate analysis, concurrent temozolomide was associated with significantly better PFS (HR 0.28, P = .02). There were no significant differences between the two radiation groups or between those treated with or without concurrent temozolomide, with respect to significant acute hematologic, non-hematologic, and long-term neurocognitive toxicities (P &gt; .05).

Conclusions

In this study, concurrent temozolomide with radiotherapy in CNS lymphoma was associated with better PFS and was well tolerated. Low-dose WBRT with a boost is a safe and reasonable treatment approach for focal refractory disease. Prospective research that includes rigorous neurocognitive assessments is now warranted.

A Retrospective Analysis of R-MPV Plus Response-adapted Whole-brain Radiotherapy for Elderly Patients with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Objective Few reports have described the real-world outcomes of rituximab, methotrexate (MTX), procarbazine, and vincristine (R-MPV) plus response-adapted whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for elderly patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). We evaluated the outcome of this regimen. Methods We evaluated >60-year-old patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL who received R-MPV plus WBRT from January 2010 to December 2019 at Toyohashi Municipal Hospital. The patients' characteristics, regimen enforcement, response rate, survival, and toxicity were analyzed. Patients Ten patients were consecutively enrolled. Their median age was 69 years old, and 60% had a performance status of 3 or 4 before induction therapy. Results Seven patients achieved a complete response after induction, and all 10 patients achieved a complete response after consolidation. Seven received reduced-dose WBRT at 23.4 Gy, and 2 received WBRT at 45 Gy. The median follow-up was 44.4 months; the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 60% and 80%, respectively; and the cumulative incidence of relapse was 40%. The incidence of symptomatic delayed neurotoxicity was 70%. Of the 7 patients who received reduced-dose WBRT, 4 (57%) developed delayed neurotoxicity, including 1 severely affected patient. Only one patient survived without relapse and delayed neurotoxicity. The ratio of patients who developed relapse or delayed neurotoxicity that impaired daily life was 33% and 100% in the MTX high- and low-intensity groups, respectively. Conclusion This regimen in elderly patients is unsatisfactory because of delayed neurotoxicity. We should consider maintaining an adequate MTX intensity, postponing or minimizing WBRT, and choosing high-dose consolidation therapy for select patients.

Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of primary CNS lymphoma-a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that occurs in the CNS (e.g. brain, meninges, spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid, or intraocular involvement) in the absence of systemic NHL. Tumor resection does not improve survival, and neurosurgical intervention is generally limited to stereotactic biopsy to provide a histopathological diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this single-center study was to evaluate the management and outcome of PCNSL patients diagnosed by biopsy, using overall survival and progression-free survival as endpoints.

METHODS

At our department of neurosurgery, 140 patients were diagnosed with PCNSL by biopsy between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018. Of these, 37 patients were included in the study and were divided into three groups according to their postoperative therapy.

RESULTS

Median OS was 35.7 months for the intensive treatment group, 29.5 months for the moderate treatment group, and 8.6 months for the palliative treatment group. The intensive and moderate treatment groups had similar progression-free survival, while the palliative treatment group had poor overall and progression-free survival. Six patients were long-term survivors (> 80 months). Age under 65 years was the main significant parameter affecting overall survival.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, patients with PCNSL had an overall fair prognosis if they (1) were under 65 years old, (2) had a performance score < 2 at the time of diagnosis, and (3) received either intensive or moderate chemotherapeutic treatment. Biopsy is still the primary diagnostic tool; other methods have been investigated but are not yet recommended.

Advances in therapeutic strategies for primary CNS B-cell lymphomas

INTRODUCTION

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) has traditionally been treated with induction HD-MTX-based chemotherapy, followed by consolidation whole-brain radiotherapy. However, this approach is associated with significant neurocognitive complications, especially in older patients. Therefore, different consolidation protocols have been evaluated. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT) has the best long-term survival outcomes in younger patients.

AREAS COVERED

In this review of the literature, we focus on the overall therapeutic strategy and advances in the management of the aggressive primary CNS B-cell lymphomas.

EXPERT OPINION

In young and fit PCNSL patients, HD-ASCT is the preferred consolidation strategy to achieve long-term survivals. Older patients with good performance status should also be evaluated for MTX-based induction polychemotherapy followed by ASCT. However, management of PCNSL patients remains challenging, and new avenues with targeted therapies are under investigation. To date, ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and immune checkpoint inhibitors appearto be promising in PCNSL. However, as monotherapy, durable responses are less likely to be achieved. Unfortunately, when combined with chemoimmunotherapy, considerable toxicity and mortality have been reported. Clinical trials on these molecules are aiming to reduce toxicity and maintain responses. CAR-T-cell therapy has recently emerged as a further option. It has shown efficacy in patients with secondary CNS lymphoma, with few but encouraging results in primary CNSL.

High-dose methotrexate and rituximab induction regimen in immunocompetent patients with primary CNS lymphoma: a retrospective single-center study of survival predictors

PURPOSE

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive tumor that is confined to the CNS. Although the provision of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) has remarkably improved outcomes in PCNSL patients, the optimal treatment regimens and standard MTX dose for induction therapy have been largely controversial. Herein, we sought to explore the impact of adjuvant rituximab and different dosages of induction HD-MTX on survival outcomes of immunocompetent patients with PCNSL.

METHODS

In this study, we examined patients with PCNSL treated at a single NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center to evaluate their survival outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 51 immunocompetent patients with PCNSL who received their induction chemotherapy at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) between 2001 and 2019. Only adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL who had either HD-MTX alone or in combination with rituximab were included. Patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There is no significant difference in survival among patients who received MTX alone versus MTX plus rituximab (HR = 0.996 (95% CI: 0.398-2.493), p = 0.994). Lower doses of MTX were associated with worse survival outcomes (HR = 0.680 (95% CI: 0.530-0.872), p = 0.002); however, this difference in survival was not significant when adjusted to age (HR = 0.797 (95% CI: 0.584-1.088), p = 0.153).

CONCLUSION

Our experience challenges the role of rituximab in PCNSL during induction therapy. Our study also highlights the shorter survival in elderly patients with PCNSL which can be related, to some extent, to the relatively lower doses of HD-MTX. There is an unmet need to establish a consensus on the most effective upfront regimen in PCNSL through prospective studies.

Non-Myeloablative Chemotherapy as Consolidation Strategy After High-Dose Methotrexate-Based Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients With Primary CNS Lymphoma: A Retrospective Single Center Study in China

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains a disease with poor outcome and high recurrence rate. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 243 immunocompetent patients with PCNSL in Beijing Tiantan Hospital. The median age of PCNSL patients was 57 years (range 10-95 years). For induction therapy, 94.7% of patients received high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) containing regimens, and 59.3% received rituximab, which increased over time. The overall response rate was 72.8%, with 58.8% achieving complete response. With a median follow-up of 27.0 months (95% confidence interval 23.6-30.4), the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 14.0 months (95% CI 9.45-18.55), and the 2-year PFS rate was 33.2%. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR), with an estimated overall survival rate at 4 years of 61.6%. Among 95 patients who completed sequential consolidation chemotherapy with either pemetrexed or etoposide plus cytarabine, the median PFS was 28 months (95% CI 17.11-38.89), and the estimated overall survival at 4 years was 78.7%. In conclusion, HD-MTX based induction chemotherapy with non-myeloablative sequential consolidation chemotherapy is an alternative feasible treatment option.

Successful treatment with adapted high dose methotrexate in a hemodialysis patient with primary central nervous system lymphoma: 100mg/m2 seems sufficient

High dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) based chemoimmunotherapy is a central part of the standard approach to treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Renal dysfunction leads to delayed MTX complete elimination and critical MTX concentration. Despite the recommendations, hemodialysis status should not exclude HD-MTX. We report the case of a 64 years old woman on chronic hemodialysis with PCNSL successfully treated with HD-MTX-based chemoimmunotherapy with an adjusted dose of 100mg/m², instead of the usual dose of 3500mg/m², and daily hemodialysis started 24h later. The patient had no significant toxicity and was in complete remission at 1 year after the end of the treatment. We argue that ESRD is not an absolute pitfall to the use of HD-MTX for hematological malignancies. Experts should consider the use of adjusted dose at 100mg/m² as a viable therapeutic modality in ESRD patients.

High-dose methotrexate dosing strategy in primary central nervous system lymphoma

The backbone induction therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and rituximab, which can be combined with other chemotherapeutic agents. The optimal dose of HD-MTX remains unclear, as doses between 3 and 8 g/m² have been shown to be effective. In this retrospective study, HD-MTX dosed at 3-5 g/m² demonstrated an overall response of 81.8%, with 11 (50%) complete responses. The median overall survival was not met at 29 months and median progression free survival was 12.5 months.There were two discontinuations due to nephrotoxicity. The most common adverse event was hepatotoxicity (18.5%), with no treatment-related mortality events observed.Overall, HD-MTX dosed at 3-5 g/m² demonstrated similar efficacy and lower toxicity compared to higher doses in PCNSL patients. Reducing the initial HD-MTX dose may help ensure tolerability and completion of induction therapy, especially in patients with co-morbidities or older age who have poorer outcomes.

Routine use of low-dose glucarpidase following high-dose methotrexate in adult patients with CNS lymphoma: an open-label, multi-center phase I study

Background

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) has broad use in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) malignancies but confers significant toxicity without inpatient hydration and monitoring. Glucarpidase is a bacterial recombinant enzyme dosed at 50 units (u)/kg, resulting in rapid systemic MTX clearance. The aim of this study was to demonstrate feasibility of low-dose glucarpidase to facilitate MTX clearance in patients with CNS lymphoma (CNSL).

Methods

Eight CNSL patients received HD-MTX 3 or 6 g/m² and glucarpidase 2000 or 1000u 24 h later. Treatments repeated every 2 weeks up to 8 cycles.

Results

Fifty-five treatments were administered. Glucarpidase 2000u yielded > 95% reduction in plasma MTX within 15 min following 33/34 doses (97.1%) and glucarpidase 1000u yielded > 95% reduction following 15/20 doses (75%). Anti-glucarpidase antibodies developed in 4 patients and were associated with MTX rebound. In CSF, glucarpidase was not detected and MTX levels remained cytotoxic after 1 (3299.5 nmol/L, n = 8) and 6 h (1254.7 nmol/L, n = 7). Treatment was safe and well-tolerated. Radiographic responses in 6 of 8 patients (75%) were as expected following MTX-based therapy.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates feasibility of planned-use low-dose glucarpidase for MTX clearance and supports the hypothesis that glucarpidase does not impact MTX efficacy in the CNS.

Clinical trial registration

NCT03684980 (Registration date 26/09/2018).

Successful Use of High Dose Methotrexate in Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma Patients Without Access to Serum Methotrexate Levels Monitoring: Challenges and Outcome

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

High dose methotrexate (HDMTx) based chemotherapy forms the backbone of therapy for patients with Primary Central Nervous system Lymphoma (PCNSL). However, delivering HDMTx in resource constrained settings, especially without therapeutic drug monitoring, is difficult. We share our experience of treatment of patients with PCNSL at our center over a 10-year period with local adaptations made to deliver HDMTx.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the case records of patients diagnosed with a PCNSL over the course of 10 years from 2010 to 2020.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients received therapy for newly diagnosed PCNSL. Thirty-six patients received Modified De-Angelis protocol ± Rituximab with curative intent. Fourteen of these patients were unable to complete the protocol with the most common cause being development of methotrexate toxicity. Patients unable to complete the designated 5 cycles of HDMTx had a poorer PS and higher probability of having a high IELSG score at baseline. Nineteen patients were given non HDMTx based therapy either due to advanced age or poor performance status. Twenty-nine patients (52.7%) were able to achieve a complete response. The most common cause of mortality was relapse/progressive disease. The Median EFS and OS of the cohort was 29 months and 40 months respectively.

CONCLUSION

All attempts should be made to have therapeutic drug level monitoring for administration of HDMTX based therapy for the patients with PCNSL, more so in patients who have poor performance status and a high IELSG score. If it is imperative to give HDMTx without access to TDM facility then a possible risk of higher toxicity should be explained to all patients, beforehand.

Urine volume to hydration volume ratio is associated with pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), but is associated with severe adverse effects, including myelosuppression and renal impairment. MTX is primarily excreted by the kidneys. Renal function calculated using serum creatinine (Scr) derived from muscle may be overestimated in elderly PCNSL patients. Therefore, we aimed to construct a population pharmacokinetic model in PCNSL patients and explore the factors associated with MTX clearance. Sixteen PCNSL patients (median age, 66 years) treated with HD-MTX were included, and serum MTX concentrations were measured at 193 points in 49 courses. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted, in which serum MTX concentrations were stratified into three groups of creatine clearance (Ccr) (50, 75, and 100 ml/min) with three groups of the urine volume to hydration volume (UV/HV) ratio (<1, 1-2, and >2). The final model was constructed as follows: MTX clearance = 4.90·(Ccr/94.5)0.456 ·(UV/HV)0.458 . In the Monte Carlo simulation, serum MTX concentrations were below the standard values (10, 1, and 0.1 µM at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively, after the start of the MTX administration) in most patients with UV/HV >2, even with Ccr of 50 ml/min. Conversely, half of the patients with UV/HV <1 and Ccr of 50 ml/min failed to achieve the standard values. The present results demonstrated that the UV/HV ratio was useful for describing the pharmacokinetics of MTX in PCNSL patients.

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas

Primary central nervous system lymphoma is a rare and aggressive extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma restricted to the brain, spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid, and eyes. Optimization of treatment including high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy followed by consolidation therapy in the form of autologous stem cell transplant or whole-brain radiation leads to improved survival. However, several patients do not respond to upfront therapy and the relapse risk is high. Additionally, there is a risk of delayed neurotoxicity, particularly in older patients. Recent molecular insights underlying the pathophysiology of PCNSL have led to the development of clinical trials involving targeted therapies and immunotherapies for salvage.

Update on Novel Therapeutics for Primary CNS Lymphoma

Simple Summary

Primary central nervous system lymphoma is a rare and aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. While it is highly responsive to first-line chemo and radiation treatments, rates of relapse are high, demonstrating the need for improved therapeutic strategies. Recent advancements in the understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease have led to the identification of new potential treatment targets and the development of novel agents. This review aims to discuss different targeted strategies and review some of the data supporting these approaches, and discusses recently completed and ongoing clinical trials using these novel agents.

Abstract

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare lymphoma isolated to the central nervous system or vitreoretinal space. Standard treatment consists of cytotoxic methotrexate-based chemotherapy, with or without radiation. Despite high rates of response, relapse is common, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic approaches. Recent advances in the understanding of PCNSL have elucidated mechanisms of pathogenesis and resistance including activation of the B-cell receptor and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways. Novel treatment strategies such as the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, and immunomodulatory drugs are promising. Increasingly, evidence suggests immune evasion plays a role in PCNSL pathogenesis and several immunotherapeutic strategies including checkpoint inhibition and targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells are under investigation. This review provides a discussion on the challenges in development of targeted therapeutic strategies, an update on recent treatment advances, and offers a look toward ongoing clinical studies.

Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma: Maximizing Clinical Benefit, Minimizing Neurotoxicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The optimal treatment for newly diagnosed and refractory or relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not fully defined. We review the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and current management strategies for newly diagnosed PCNSL as well as emerging treatments for refractory and relapsed disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent decades, the incidence of PCNSL has increased in the elderly population. With advancements in chemotherapy for PCNSL, survival has improved. However, outcomes remain inferior when compared with other forms of extranodal lymphoma. Additionally, treatments can be associated with clinically significant neurotoxicities. Despite advances in the treatment of PCNSL, current treatment regimens remain suboptimal in terms of response rates and neurotoxicity. Well-tolerated agents, especially for the elderly, are still needed.

Recent Progress on Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma-From Bench to Bedside

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare subtype of extra-nodal lymphoma. The high relapse rate of PCNSL remains a major challenge to the hematologists, even though patients exhibit high sensitivity to the methotrexate-based chemotherapeutic regimens. Recently, the advent of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) and CAR T treatment has made more treatment options available to a proportion of patients. However, whether BTKi monotherapy should be given alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapy is still a clinical question. The status of CAR T therapy for PCNSLs also needs to be elucidated. In this review, we summarized the latest progress on the epidemiology, pathology, clinical manifestation, diagnosis, and treatment options for PCNSLs.

Advances in treatment of elderly primary central nervous system lymphoma

The management of older individuals (≥60 years) with primary central nervous system lymphoma remains a clinical challenge. Identification of optimal therapy and delivering adequate dose intensity are two of the major issues in treating elderly patients. Premorbid performance status and comorbidities influence individualised treatment approaches and geriatric assessment tools are increasingly utilised. Optimal induction treatment remains high-dose methotrexate-based immunochemotherapy, delivery is feasible in the majority of patients and the goal of treatment remains achieving complete remission. Consolidation strategies are also relevant in the elderly, aiming to maximise duration of response and quality of life (QoL). Potential options include high-dose therapy with haematopoietic stem cell consolidation, non-myeloablative chemotherapy and whole-brain radiotherapy. Efficacy of novel agents, such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and lenalidomide, have been reported; these represent an alternative for elderly patients unfit for chemotherapy. Prognosis remains poor, improvement of outcomes in this age group is urgently needed.

Treatment Regimens for Immunocompetent Elderly Patients with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Scoping Review

Simple Summary

Most patients diagnosed with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are 60 years or older and tend to have a poor prognosis. Evidence to guide and optimize treatment choices for these vulnerable patients is limited. We performed a scoping review to identify and describe all relevant clinical studies investigating chemotherapies and combinations of chemotherapies (including high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT)) in elderly PCNSL patients. In total, we identified six randomized controlled trials, 26 prospective and 24 retrospective studies (with/without control group). While most studies investigated protocols based on ‘conventional’ chemotherapy treatment, data evaluating HCT-ASCT in the elderly were scarce, and the generalizability of the only RCT published is questionable. Considering the poor prognosis of these patients and their need for more effective treatment options, a thoroughly planned randomized controlled trial comparing HCT-ASCT with ‘conventional’ chemoimmunotherapy is urgently needed to evaluate the efficacy of HCT-ASCT.

Abstract

Background: Most patients diagnosed with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are older than 60 years. Despite promising treatment options for younger patients, prognosis for the elderly remains poor and efficacy of available treatment options is limited. Materials and Methods: We conducted a scoping review to identify and summarize the current study pool available evaluating different types and combinations of (immuno) chemotherapy with a special focus on HCT-ASCT in elderly PCNSL. Relevant studies were identified through systematic searches in the bibliographic databases Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ScienceDirect (last search conducted in September 2020). For ongoing studies, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov, the German study register and the WHO registry. Results: In total, we identified six randomized controlled trials (RCT) with 1.346 patients, 26 prospective (with 1.366 patients) and 24 retrospective studies (with 2.629 patients). Of these, only six studies (one completed and one ongoing RCT (with 447 patients), one completed and one ongoing prospective single arm study (with 65 patients), and two retrospective single arm studies (with 122 patients)) evaluated HCT-ASCT. Patient relevant outcomes such as progression-free and overall survival and (neuro-)toxicity were adequately considered across almost all studies. The current study pool is, however, not conclusive in terms of the most effective treatment options for elderly. Main limitations were (very) small sample sizes and heterogeneous patient populations in terms of age ranges (particularly in RCTs) limiting the applicability of the results to the target population (elderly). Conclusions: Although it has been shown that HCT-ASCT is probably a feasible and effective treatment option, this approach has never been investigated within a RCT including a wide range of elderly patients. A RCT comparing conventional (immuno) chemotherapy with HCT-ASCT is crucial to evaluate benefit and harms in an un-biased manner to eventually provide older PCNSL patients with the most effective treatment.