Post-thrombotic syndrome after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis (CaVenT): 5-year follow-up results of an open-label, randomised controlled trial

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of femoropopliteal veins for treatment of post-thrombotic syndrome

Background: Controversy persists concerning the endovascular treatment of the post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), particularly if femoropopliteal veins are involved. Methods: We screened consecutive patients with PTS who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of femoropopliteal veins using posterior tibial or popliteal vein access who had at least 3-month follow-up. Our assessment included the evaluation of primary and secondary patency of the treated segments by Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and clinical outcomes measured by the change in Villalta score as well as ulcer healing. Results: Among 29 patients, 8 (27.7%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 53.3 (13.6) years. Posterior tibial vein and popliteal access were used in 26 (89.7%) and 3 patients (10.3%), respectively. 13 (44.8%) patients had prior (n = 11, 37.9%) or concomitant (n = 9, 31.0%) endovascular treatment of the iliac or common femoral veins. At a median follow-up of 395 days (Q1: 205-Q3: 756 days), primary patency of femoropopliteal veins was 79.3% (95% CI 64.6-94.1%) and secondary patency was 82.8% (95% CI, 69.0-96.5%). The percentage of patients with moderate or severe PTS according to the Villalta score decreased from baseline to last follow-up from 34.5% to 18.5% and from 31% to 14.8%, respectively (p<0.003). Overall, the mean (SD) Villalta score decreased from 11.5 (1.7) to 8.0 (1.7) (p<0.0001). Postprocedural complete ulcer healing occurred in 4 out of 5 (80%) patients. Two (6.9%) patients developed new ulcers. No major bleeding, pulmonary embolism, stroke, or death occurred. Conclusion: PTA of femoropopliteal veins via posterior tibial or popliteal vein access appears to improve the severity of PTS with acceptable patency rates.

Comparison of anticoagulation vs mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the comparative effects of treatment with contemporary mechanical thrombectomy (MT) or anticoagulation (AC) on Villalta scores and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) incidence through 12 months in iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

Patients with DVT in the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) randomized trial and the ClotTriever Outcomes (CLOUT) registry were included in this analysis. Both studies evaluated the effects of thrombus removal on the incidence of PTS. Patients with bilateral DVT, isolated femoral-popliteal DVT, symptom duration of >4 weeks, or incomplete case data for matching covariates were excluded. Propensity scores were used to match patients 1:1 who received AC (from ATTRACT) with those treated with mechanical thrombectomy (from CLOUT) using nearest neighbor matching on nine baseline covariates, including age, body mass index, leg treated, provoked DVT, prior venous thromboembolism, race, sex, Villalta score, and symptom duration. Clinical outcomes, including Villalta score and PTS, were assessed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of developing PTS at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 164 pairs were matched, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics after matching. There were fewer patients with any PTS at 6 months (19% vs 46%; P < .001) and 12 months (17% vs 38%; P < .001) in the MT treatment group. Modeling revealed that, after adjusting for baseline Villalta scores, patients treated with AC had significantly higher odds of developing any PTS (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-6.2; P = .002) or moderate to severe PTS (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-8.4; P = .027) at 12 months compared with those treated with MT. Mean Villalta scores were lower through 12 months among those receiving MT vs AC (3.3 vs 6.3 at 30 days, 2.5 vs 5.5 at 6 months, and 2.6 vs 4.9 at 12 months; P < .001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

MT treatment of iliofemoral DVT was associated with significantly lower Villalta scores and a lower incidence of PTS through 12 months compared with treatment using AC. Results from currently enrolling clinical trials will further clarify the role of these therapies in the prevention of PTS after an acute DVT event.

Current Evidence for Endovascular Therapies in the Management of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis

Acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), specifically proximal iliofemoral DVT, is a relatively common disorder that can result in a chronic debilitating post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), with a significant effect on a patient's quality of life. Anticoagulation is first-line therapy; however, percutaneous interventions have emerged as treatment options for patients where there is concern that anticoagulation alone will not resolve the DVT as well as prevent PTS. This paper will discuss the existing data on these interventions and review current endovascular techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and large-bore mechanical thrombectomy in the management of DVT.

Risk factors of moderate to severe post-thrombotic syndrome within 2 years in patients with subacute thrombosis: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to study the risk factors influencing the occurrence of moderate to severe post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) within 2 years in patients with subacute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

Seventy patients who developed moderate to severe PTS within 2 years after subacute lower extremity DVT from June 2018 to June 2022 were retrospectively selected as the case group. They were matched 1:1 by sex and age (±5 years) with 70 patients who did not develop moderate to severe PTS during the same follow-up period as the control group. Multiple logistic regression, stratified analysis, and interaction analyses were used to explore the risk factors for moderate to severe PTS.

RESULTS

The multiple logistic regression model showed that patients with iliofemoral vein thrombosis had a significantly increased risk of developing moderate to severe PTS within 2 years. Patients who underwent intraluminal intervention treatment during hospitalization had a significantly reduced risk. The odds ratios were 4.000 (95% confidence interval, 1.597-10.016) for the femoral-popliteal vein thrombosis and 0.262 (95% confidence interval, 0.106-0.647) for the anticoagulation treatment group. The stratified analysis showed that intraluminal intervention treatment was a protective factor against moderate to severe PTS within 2 years across different strata of hypertension, thrombus type, body mass index, duration of anticoagulation, and wearing compression stockings. Additionally, there was an interaction between thrombus type and treatment method, with intraluminal intervention treatment having a more pronounced effect on preventing moderate to severe PTS in patients with iliofemoral vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Iliofemoral vein thrombosis is a risk factor for the development of moderate to severe PTS within 2 years in patients with subacute lower extremity DVT. Intraluminal intervention treatment can reduce the risk of moderate to severe PTS, especially in patients with iliofemoral vein thrombosis.

Fibrinogen levels and clot properties identify patients who benefit from catheter-directed thrombolysis after DVT

ABSTRACT

Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (UA-CDT) to improve patency after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has not conclusively been shown to prevent postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) but might benefit patients who are unlikely to obtain patency with standard treatment. We hypothesized that these patients could be selected based on their fibrin clot properties. To study this, patients with acute iliofemoral DVT from the CAVA (Ultrasound-Accelerated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Anticoagulation for the Prevention of Post-thrombotic Syndrome) trial had blood samples taken at inclusion. Fibrin clot properties in plasma were determined by turbidimetric clotting (lag time and maximal turbidity) and lysis assays (time to 50% lysis and lysis rate), permeation assay, and confocal microscopy (fiber density), as well as levels of fibrin clot modifiers fibrinogen and C-reactive protein (CRP). Patency was defined as >90% iliofemoral vein compressibility at 12-month ultrasound. PTS was defined as ≥5 Villalta score at 6 or 12 months. In total, 91 of 152 patients were included, including 43 with additional UA-CDT and 48 with standard treatment. Patients with additional UA-CDT more often obtained patency (55.8 vs 27.1%) Patients who obtained patency had longer lag times and lower maximal turbidity, fibrinogen, and CRP; only maximal turbidity and fibrinogen remained associated when adjusting for treatment, thrombus load, and body mass index. Fibrinogen levels had an optimal cutoff at 4.85 g/L. Low fibrinogen levels best predicted patency. Additional UA-CDT decreased the risk of PTS only in patients with high fibrinogen. Therefore, additional UA-CDT might prevent PTS in selected patients based on routinely measured fibrinogen levels. This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT00970619.

Calf deep veins are safe and feasible accesses for the endovascular treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

This study was designed to assess the optimal access route for the endovascular treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis who underwent endovascular treatment from February 2009 to December 2020. Patients underwent non-direct calf deep vein puncture (NDCDVP) from February 2009 to December 2011 and direct calf deep vein puncture (DCDVP) from January 2012 to December 2020. Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) was used to treat all patients in the NDCDVP group, whereas patients in the DCDVP group were treated with CDT or the AngioJet rhyolitic thrombectomy system. In patients exhibiting iliac vein compression syndrome, the iliac vein was dilated and implanted with a stent. Technical success rates and perioperative complication rates were compared between these two treatment groups. The NDCDVP group included 83 patients (40 males, 43 females) with a mean age of 55 ± 16 years, while the DCDVP group included 487 patients (231 males. 256 females) with a mean age of 56 ± 15 years. No significant differences were observed between these groups with respect to any analyzed clinical characteristics. The technical success rates in the NDCDVP and DCDVP groups were 96.4 and 98.2%, respectively (P > 0.05). In the NDCDVP group, the small saphenous vein (SSV)or great saphenous vein (GSV)were the most common access routes (77.1%, 64/83), whereas the anterior tibial vein (ATV) was the most common access route in the DCDVP group (78.0%, 380/487), followed by the posterior tibial vein (PTV) and peroneal vein (PV)(15.6% and 6.4%, respectively). Relative to the NDCDVP group, more patients in the DCDVP group underwent the removal of deep vein clots below the knee (7.2% [6/83] vs. 24.2% [118/487], P < 0.001). Moreover, relative to the NDCDVP group, significantly lower complication rates were evident in the DCDVP group (local infection: 10.8% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001; local hematoma: 15.7% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.001). The position change rate was also significantly lower in the DCDVP group relative to the NDCDVP group (0% [0/487] vs. 60.2% [50/83], P < 0.001). The calf deep veins (CDVs) represent a feasible and safe access route for the endovascular treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Single-procedure 8Fr rheolytic pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis

PURPOSE

We hypothesize that single-procedure venous-specific rheolytic thrombectomy for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) will result in improved clinical symptoms as measured by the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), as well as durable venous patency, with decreased hemorrhagic risks and costs associated with conventional catheter-directed therapy and prolonged lytic exposure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive patients with symptomatic, unilateral, iliofemoral DVT who were treated with single-procedure therapy using the 8Fr rheolytic thrombectomy catheter were retrospectively analyzed from 2012-2021. Abstracted data included technical success (> 95% clearance of acute thrombus), adverse events (AEs), and clinical and imaging outcomes at 1-month and 1-year.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all 33 patients. Mean pre-procedure VCSS was 7.5 with mean edema and pain sub-scores of 2.6 and 1.8, respectively. Post-procedural total mean VCSS at one month was significantly improved (mean post-procedure VCSS = 0.3, mean reduction of 7.2, P < 0.01). Clinical improvement was sustained at 1-year (mean total VCSS = 0.2, P < 0.01). Primary patency was achieved in all patients at 1-month and 30 (91%) patients at 1-year. Among the 3 patients in which primary patency was not achieved at 1-year, primary-assisted patency was achieved in 2 patients. Secondary patency was achieved in the remaining patient at 1-year. No hemorrhagic AEs occurred in this study.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that single-procedure venous-specific rheolytic thrombectomy for treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT is safe and effective, resulting in durable clinical and radiographic results at one year, while also limiting hemorrhagic risks, mitigating costs of admission, and expediting patient discharge.

Syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy results in good safety and short-term outcomes in the treatment of patients with deep venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the short-term outcomes and safety of syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study of hospitalized patients with iliofemoral and/or inferior vena caval deep venous thrombosis, excluding those with pulmonary embolism. We collected the following patient data from the electronic medical records: age, sex, provoked/unprovoked deep venous thrombosis, symptom duration, thrombosed segments, and the presence of a tumor, thrombophilia, diabetes, and/or iliac vein compression syndrome. Venography and computed tomographic venography were performed in all patients before the procedure. All patients underwent syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy under local anesthesia and sedation, and all received low-molecular-weight heparin peri-operatively. All patients underwent implantation of an inferior vena caval filter. Rivaroxaban was administered post-procedure, instead of heparin, for 3-6 months, with lower extremity compression.

RESULTS

Overall, 29 patients with deep venous thrombosis underwent syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy from January 2022 to October 2022 in our institution. Technical success (>70% thrombus resolution) was achieved in all patients, and using a single procedure in 25/29 patients (86%). Concomitant stenting was performed in 18/29 (62%) of the patients, and 21/29 (69%) underwent angioplasty. The median (interquartile range) procedure time was 110 min (100-122), the median intra-operative bleeding volume was 150 mL (120-180), and the median decrease in the hemoglobin concentration from pre- to post-operative was 7 g/L (4-14). The median follow-up duration was 7 months (5-9). All patients obtained symptomatic relief, and 27/29 achieved near-remission or full remission (combined total). No patients experienced peri-operative bleeding complications, or symptom recurrence or post-thrombectomy syndrome during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The short-term outcomes following syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis were excellent, and the procedure was safe.

The role and principles of stenting in acute iliofemoral thrombosis

Catheter-directed interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) have been increasingly used over the past 15 years to target severe symptomatology and prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome incidence or reduce its severity if it were to develop. Aside from successful thrombus removal, adjunctive stents are frequently required to treat an uncovered lesion or significant residual thrombus to ensure quality of life improvement besides retarding DVT recurrence and post-thrombotic syndrome. As the evidence is mounting, the need and role for stenting, as well as the principles of an optimal technique, in the acute DVT setting are now better understood. Accumulating experience appears to favor stenting in the acute setting. The diameter of the stent, the length, the extent of overlapping, and the landing zones are crucial determinants of a successful durable outcome. This article endeavors to guide the interventionalist on stenting when encountering a patient with acute symptomatic iliofemoral DVT with concerns of quality of life impairment.

Cost Effectiveness of Early Endovenous Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE

Early clot removal using endovascular intervention aims to reduce post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) following iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). This may reduce long term morbidity but incurs a higher initial cost. This study examined the cost effectiveness of catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) and pharmacochemical thrombectomy (PMT) compared with oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone for treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A combined decision tree (acute DVT complications) and Markov model (long term complications [PTS]) was used for decision analytic modelling with five states: no PTS, mild PTS, moderate PTS, severe PTS, and dead. All patients started with acute DVT. Patients who survived acute complications transitioned into the Markov model. Cycle time was six months. A healthcare payer perspective and lifetime horizon was used, adjusting for excess mortality due to history of thrombosis. Data for probabilities, transition probabilities, mortality, and utilities were obtained from the published literature. Cost data were obtained from UK NHS tariffs and published literature. Outcomes were mean lifetime cost, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost effectiveness.

RESULTS

Over a patient's lifetime, OAC was more costly (£37 206) than CDT (£32 043) and PMT (£36 288). Mean lifetime QALYs for OAC (12.9) were lower than CDT (13.5) and PMT (13.3). Therefore, in the incremental cost effectiveness analysis, both CDT and PMT were dominant: CDT was less costly (-£5 163) and more effective (+0.6 QALYs) than OAC, and PMT was also less costly (-£917) and more effective (+0.3 QALYs) than OAC. Results were robust to univariable sensitivity analyses, but probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested considerable parameter uncertainty.

CONCLUSION

Early interventional treatment of iliofemoral DVT is cost effective in the UK. Future clinical and epidemiological studies are needed to characterise parameter uncertainty. Further analysis of modern practice, alternative treatments, and optimised care models is warranted.

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Protocols for Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

 To summarize characteristics, complications, and success rates of different catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) protocols for the treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LE-DVT).

METHODS

 A systematic review using electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials and observational studies related to LE-DVT treated with CDT. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to obtain the pooled proportions of early complications, postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), and venous patency.

RESULTS

 Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria reporting 49 protocols (n = 3,028 participants). In studies that addressed the thrombus location (n = 37), LE-DVT had iliofemoral involvement in 90 ± 23% of the cases. Only four series described CDT as the sole intervention for LE-DVT, while 47% received additional thrombectomy (manual, surgical, aspiration, or pharmacomechanical), and 89% used stenting.Definition of venogram success was highly variable, being the Venous Registry Index the most used method (n = 19). Among those, the minimal thrombolysis rate (<50% lysed thrombus) was 0 to 53%, partial thrombolysis (50-90% lysis) was 10 to 71%, and complete thrombolysis (90-100%) was 0 to 88%. Pooled outcomes were 8.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.6-10.7) for minor bleeding, 1.2% (95% CI: 0.8-1.7%) for major bleeding, 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6-1.6) for pulmonary embolism, and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.3-0.9) for death. Pooled incidences of PTS and of venous patency at up to 1 year of follow-up were 17.6% (95% CI: 11.8-23.4) and 77.5% (95% CI: 68.1-86.9), respectively.

CONCLUSION

 Assessment of the evidence is hampered by the heterogeneity of protocols, which may be reflected in the variation of PTS rates. Despite this, CDT is a low-risk treatment for LE-DVT.

The emerging role of mechanical thrombectomy in acute DVT management

Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy in various technical combinations have been the main driver of acute deep venous interventions for over a decade. While the majority of high-level evidence was based on it, CDT requires longer procedural care and is associated to a small but not negligible bleeding risk. Contemporary DVT intervention, following the paradigm shift in myocardial infarction and stroke management, has steadily migrated towards minimizing or eliminating thrombolytics due to the introduction of mechanical/aspiration thrombectomy. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) devices are undoubtedly improving our ability to remove thrombus more efficiently in a single session without the adverse events and complex logistics related to the use of thrombolytics.

The background and role of catheter-directed thrombolysis evolving procedures for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis

Minimal invasive treatment such as early endovenous thrombus removal for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) emerged in the end of last century. The principle is catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using either plasminogen activating agents alone, as ultrasound-assisted CDT, or in combination with mechanical devices as pharmaco-mechanical CDT. The interest for this treatment modality is the high rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with anticoagulation (AC) alone, especially after iliofemoral DVT. Recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early thrombus removal with AC alone, as well as non-randomized studies, have demonstrated favorable rates, or at least a decrease of moderate and severe PTS, in favor of these procedures. This article will summarize the background and evolution of the procedures in the last three decades and discuss fundamental criteria for inclusion and exclusion, focusing on the procedures regarding thrombus age and location, technical issues, complications and results including different outcome measures for PTS, for which iliac DVT involvement is a massive risk factor to be prevented.

Randomized controlled trials of interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), notably deep venous thrombosis (DVT), represents a significant cardiovascular disease with high morbidity from post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Recent advancements in early thrombus removal technologies have prompted randomized controlled trials (RCT) to assess their efficacy and safety, particularly for iliofemoral DVT (IF-DVT), which carries the greatest risk of developing PTS. This narrative review summarizes these trials and introduces upcoming innovations to evaluate acute intervention for IF-DVT. Specific technologies discussed include catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis, ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis, and non-lytic mechanical thrombectomy. This review underscores the importance of patient selection, with those presenting with extensive, symptomatic IF-DVT likely to benefit most.

Quality of Life After Early Clot Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Objective

To evaluate patient reported outcome measures after early clot removal for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), using the Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).

Methods

Cross sectional design. Patients who underwent early clot removal between June 2012 and November 2021 were asked to complete the two questionnaires once. Lower CIVIQ-20 and higher SF-36 scores indicate better quality of life (QoL). Primary endpoints were the median scores. The one sample Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare SF-36 physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) to the normative and CIVIQ-20 to the minimum. Secondary, non-parametric independent t test or Fisher's exact test examined how age, sex, body mass index, stent placement, re-intervention, and time of questionnaire completion related to QoL. Multivariable linear regression tested whether various variables were associated with QoL.

Results

The response rate was 73.5% (n = 39). Median time of questionnaire completion was 1.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.1) after clot removal. The median CIVIQ-20 of 29.0 (IQR 28.0) was slightly higher than the minimum value 20.0 (p < .001). The median PCS (50.5, IQR 16.6) and median MCS (50.2, IQR 14.2) did not differ from the normative of 50.0. However, wide IQRs indicated impairments for a subgroup of patients. None of the tested variables affected QoL except for the finding that re-interventions had a significantly negative impact on the SF-36 MCS (standardised β coefficient of -0.4, p = .030).

Conclusion

Overall patient reported outcome measures were satisfactory after early clot removal, but impaired physical and mental functioning levels were present in a subgroup of patients. Re-interventions were found to have a negative impact on mental QoL. This finding was independent of time that had passed between the procedure and questionnaire completion. This study emphasises that mental functioning deserves attention, besides the widely recognised physical consequences after invasive acute iliofemoral DVT treatment.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Current Challenges, and Ways Forward

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects >1.2 million Americans annually. Although the clinical outcomes and economic burdens of VTE have been well described, the impact of VTE on patients' health status has yet to be summarized. This systematic review summarizes how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been used in VTE to date.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed/MEDLINE was queried for literature published through March 2023 using PROMs in a population of patients with VTE. Studies were excluded if the reference was an editorial, review, or case report, or if the study included patients with conditions other than VTE. Qualitative analyses were performed. After screening and exclusion, 136 references were identified; 5 described PROM development, 20 focused on PROM validation, and 111 used PROMs in outcomes research. The most used generic PROMs were the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey and EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire, and the most common disease-specific PROMs were the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life/Symptoms and the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire. PROMs were used to quantify the changes in health status after diagnosis, characterize the trajectory of subsequent improvement, and identify drivers of continued impairments in health status like postthrombotic syndrome and postpulmonary embolism syndrome. PROMs were also used to investigate the impact of novel treatment modalities on quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates the many benefits of PROM use, including quantifying changes in health status with treatment, capturing patients' experiences with the treatment itself, and identifying complications of VTE. Incorporating PROMs into VTE care will be an essential component of evaluating the effectiveness of novel therapies and should lead to improved shared decision-making for patients with VTE.

Case Report: It's not always about the veins; intervention of bilateral May-Thurner Syndrome secondary to iliac aneurysm

May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS) remains evasive because of the insidiousness and variable etiologies by which it can manifest. In this study, we examine a unique presentation of MTS resulting from compression of both common iliac veins by a right common iliac artery aneurysm that required complex endovascular venous and arterial intervention.

Single-center experience with the ClotTriever BOLD catheter for deep vein thrombosis percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy of the lower extremity

Background

The ClotTriever System is a percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy system used to treat deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The BOLD catheter is a newer compatible component with a modified coring element for which reported outcomes are limited. This retrospective study aims to assess the preliminary procedural safety and success data for patients treated with the BOLD catheter.

Methods

All consecutive patients with symptomatic lower extremity DVT who underwent thrombectomy with the BOLD catheter between 23 November 2021 and 26 June 2022 at a single center were included. Baseline and procedural characteristics were reported. The primary outcome, intraprocedural safety, was assessed by a chart review of recorded intraprocedural adverse events (AEs) or device malfunction. The secondary outcome, procedural success, was defined as ≥75% reduction in the total occlusion across treated venous segments. This was assessed by an interventionalist review of pre- and postprocedural venograms. Additional outcomes included length of postprocedural hospital stay and assessment of AEs at discharge and a 30-day follow-up visit.

Results

Eleven patient cases were reviewed. The median patient age was 65 years, the majority were women, and all were treated unilaterally. All procedures were completed in a single session without intraprocedural AEs or device malfunction. The median procedural blood loss was 50 ml. A review of pre- and postprocedural venograms showed that 35 venous segments were treated, including the femoral (n = 9), common femoral (n = 9), external iliac (n = 10), and common iliac (n = 7) veins. Procedural success was achieved in 10 patients (90.9%), and the median reduction rate in venous occlusion was 100%. The median length of postprocedural hospital stay was 1 day, and no AEs were noted at discharge (N = 11). One adverse event occurred among the eight patients who completed their follow-up visit. A patient with advanced-stage cancer and medication failure had a recurrent DVT 13 days postprocedure, which was not related to the device or procedure.

Conclusions

No safety concerns concerning the BOLD catheter were raised during the review of the cases included in this analysis, and the device was successful in reducing venous occlusion in patients with symptomatic proximal lower extremity DVT.

Acute and chronic venous occlusion

This review article provides an overview of acute and chronic venous occlusion, a condition that can cause significant morbidity and mortality if not diagnosed and treated promptly. The article begins with an introduction to the anatomy of the venous system, followed by a discussion of the causes and clinical features of venous occlusion. The diagnostic tools available for the assessment of venous occlusion, including imaging modalities such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI, are then discussed, along with their respective advantages and limitations. The article also covers the treatment options for acute and chronic venous occlusion, including anticoagulant therapy and endovascular interventions. This review aims to provide radiologists with an updated understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of acute and chronic venous occlusion.

Current challenges in the prevention and management of post-thrombotic syndrome-towards improved prevention

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a common and potentially debilitating complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), affecting up to 50% of DVT patients. The consequence of this chronic condition includes reduced quality of life, increased use of the healthcare system and decreased productivity. The societal impact of this condition is projected to increase, given our ageing population and increased burden of thrombotic diseases. Despite significant recent advances in our understanding of PTS, many unanswered questions remain. Currently, there are few effective and proven options for established PTS; hence, the emphasis should be on instituting effective prevention to reduce the progression to PTS. Effective anticoagulation lowers the risk of PTS, with direct oral anticoagulants appearing to outperform vitamin-K antagonists. However, the evidence for elastic compression stockings and endovascular thrombolysis or thrombectomy techniques remains unclear. Accurate identification of individuals at high risk of developing PTS may also improve the targeting of preventative interventions. This review will examine the current body of evidence regarding PTS, with a focus on preventative strategies as well as novel biomarkers.

Coagulation-monitored, dose-adjusted catheter-directed thrombolysis or pharmaco-mechanical thrombus removal in deep vein thrombosis

Background: Pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) are therapeutic options for selected patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Patients and methods: We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 159 patients with symptomatic iliofemoral DVT undergoing PMT alone, CDT alone, or CDT followed by PMT (bail-out) in the Swiss Venous Stent Registry. The primary outcome was the incidence of peri-interventional major and minor bleeding complications (ISTH criteria). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PTS and stent patency after 3 years. Results: Mean age was 49±20 years and 58% were women. DVT involved the iliac veins in 99% of patients, whereas 53% had an underlying iliac vein compression. PMT alone was used in 40 patients, CDT alone in 77, and 42 received initial CDT followed by bail-out PMT due to insufficient thrombus clearance. Single-session PMT was the preferred approach in patients with iliac vein compression, patent popliteal vein, and absence of IVC thrombus. Patients treated with PMT alone received a lower r-tPA dose (median 10 mg, IQR 10-10) vs. those treated with CDT (20 mg, IQR 10-30). The rate of peri-interventional major bleeding was 0%, 1%, and 2%, whereas that of minor bleeding was 0%, 1%, and 12%, respectively, all occurring during CDT. After 3 years, PTS occurred in 6%, 9%, and 7% of patients, respectively. The primary stent patency rate was 95%, 88%, and 83%, respectively. Conclusions: The use of PMT and CDT for iliofemoral DVT was overall safe and resulted in high long-term patency and treatment success. Given the less severe presentation of DVT, single-session PMT appeared to be characterized by numerically better primary patency and lower perioperative bleeding event rates than CDT.

Six-Month Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Treating Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis from the 500-Patient CLOUT Registry

PURPOSE

Mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is being increasingly utilized to reduce symptoms and prevent postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), but more data on clinical outcomes are needed. Mechanical thrombectomy was studied in the ClotTriever Outcomes (CLOUT) registry with 6-month full analysis outcomes reported herein.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The CLOUT registry is a prospective, all-comer study that enrolled 500 lower extremity DVT patients across 43 US sites treated with mechanical thrombectomy using the ClotTriever System. Core-lab assessed Marder scores and physician-assessed venous patency by duplex ultrasound, PTS assessment using Villalta score, venous symptom severity, pain, and quality of life scores through 6 months were analyzed. Adverse events were identified and independently adjudicated.

RESULTS

All-cause mortality at 30 days was 0.9%, and 8.6% of subjects experienced a serious adverse event (SAE) within the first 30 days, 1 of which (0.2%) was device related. SAE rethrombosis/residual thrombus incidence was 4.8% at 30 days and 8.0% at 6 months. Between baseline and 6 months, venous flow increased from 27.2% to 92.5% of limbs (P < 0.0001), and venous compressibility improved from 28.0% to 91.8% (P < 0.0001), while median Villalta scores improved from 9.0 at baseline to 1.0 at 6 months (P < 0.0001). Significant improvements in venous symptom severity, pain, and quality of life were also demonstrated. Outcomes from iliofemoral and isolated femoral-popliteal segments showed similar improvements.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes from the CLOUT study, a large prospective registry for DVT, indicate that mechanical thrombectomy is safe and demonstrates significant improvement in symptoms and health status through 6 months. Level of Evidence 3: Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.

Long Term Follow Up, Causes for Re-intervention, and Consequences for Surveillance After Stenting for Proximal Deep Vein Obstruction

OBJECTIVE

Venous stenting is performed increasingly for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with good short term patency results, but long term data are scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long term outcome of stenting for acute DVT and PTS and to study causes of re-intervention.

METHODS

All patients stented for acute DVT and PTS between May 2006 and November 2021 were included retrospectively in this single centre cohort study. Patency was studied by duplex ultrasound (DUS) or computed tomography. The primary endpoint was stent patency. Re-intervention free survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Secondary endpoints were causes of re-intervention, using the Pouncey classification system (2022). Binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for predictors of re-intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were included, with 129 limbs involved (acute DVT n = 53; 41%), PTS n = 76; 59%). Median follow up was 2.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.3) for acute DVT and 5.2 years (IQR 7.1) for PTS. Primary patency, secondary patency, and permanent occlusion were 73.5%, 98.1%, and 1.9% for acute DVT, and 63.2%, 92.1%, and 7.9% for PTS limbs. Overall, 41 limbs underwent at least one re-intervention: 14 in the acute DVT group and 27 for PTS. Most re-interventions (82.9%) were performed within the first year after stenting. Missed inflow, insufficient flow, and thrombosis despite anticoagulation were the most common causes of re-intervention. The strongest predictor for re-intervention for PTS was inflow disease (odds ratio 3.57, 95% confidence interval 1.26 - 10.13, p= .017).

CONCLUSION

Long term patency of deep venous stenting is good. Re-interventions are typically performed in the first year and are potentially preventable by improving the procedure and patient selection. Since secondary patency rates are excellent, selected patients may be considered for discharge from long term surveillance.

Catheter-based therapies and short-term outcomes in the oncological patients with acute inferior vena cava thrombosis: a single centre experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of catheter-based therapy (CBT) using AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (ART) device or large lumen catheter (LLC) in the oncological patients with inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including eligible patients with IVCT treated with CBT coupled with dose-reduced thrombolysis as the first-line treatment from February 1, 2015 to January 1, 2022. The baseline demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, treatment details, course data were all reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients (mean age 58.8 years, 57.6% male) was included, of whom 17 patients underwent ART and 16 underwent LLC aspiration, the technical success rates were 100%. All patients subsequently underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis relative to reduced-dose thrombolysis. At the end of catheter-directed thrombolysis, clinical success was achieved in 26 (78.8%) patients. In the subgroup analysis, ART seemed to receive a slightly higher rate of thrombus removal Grade III (47.1% vs 12.5%, p = .057). The symptoms of leg pain and swelling post-treatment were significantly improved in both groups (p < .001). Except for transient macroscopic hemoglobinuria occurring in patients with ART, none of all patients suffered from procedure-related adverse events and major complications. Minor complications such as bleeding events occurred in 6.1% (2/33) of patients. At the 6 month follow-up, the incidence of recurrent thrombosis and mild post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) were 9.7% (3/31) and 6.5% (2/31).

CONCLUSION

CBT is a safe and effective modality for the management of IVCT in the oncological patients, leading to high levels of technical and clinical success, symptoms alleviation, as well as a low incidence of minor complication, mild PTS and recurrence.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE STATEMENT

The available data and evidence of endovascular therapy (ET) on oncologic patients with IVCT remains insufficient. The purpose of present single center retrospective study including 33 oncological patients is to investigate the preliminary safety and efficacy of CBT using ART device or LLC. The results demonstrated that CBTs are safe and effective as an ET modality in majority of eligible patients with symptomatic acute cancer-associated IVCT, indicating high levels of technical and clinical success, symptoms alleviation, as well as a low prevalence of minor complication, mild post-thrombotic syndrome and recurrence. Furthermore, they have the advantages of accelerated reduction of thrombus burden in a moderate time, speedy restoration of blood flow, but at the risk of potentially increased economic cost. Notably, in the condition of parallel time and dosages of lytic agents, ART tends to achieve a slightly higher thrombus removal Grade III than LLCA.

Delphi Consensus on Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis and Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction

Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction cause substantial patient harm and are increasingly managed with endovascular venous interventions, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement. However, studies of these treatment elements have not been designed and reported with sufficient rigor to support confident conclusions about their clinical utility. In this project, the Trustworthy consensus-based statement approach was utilized to develop, via a structured process, consensus-based statements to guide future investigators of venous interventions. Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venous study description and design, safety outcome assessment, efficacy outcome assessment, and topics specific to evaluating percutaneous venous thrombectomy and stent placement. Using modified Delphi techniques for consensus achievement, a panel of physician experts in vascular disease voted on the statements and succeeded in reaching the predefined threshold of >80% consensus (agreement or strong agreement) on all 30 statements. It is hoped that the guidance from these statements will improve standardization, objectivity, and patient-centered relevance in the reporting of clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in clinical studies and thereby enhance venous patient care.

Meta-analysis of lytic catheter-based intervention for acute proximal deep vein thrombosis in the reduction of post-thrombotic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a common complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) that can result in significant morbidity for the patient with detrimental impact on their quality of life. Evidence supporting lytic catheter-based interventions (LCBI) undertaken for early thrombus reduction in acute proximal DVT for the prevention of PTS is conflicting. Despite this, rates of LCBIs are increasing. To summaries the existing evidence and pool treatment effects, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of LCBIs in proximal acute DVT for the prevention of PTS was undertaken.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was undertaken aligning with PRISMA guidelines following a protocol pre-registered on PROSPERO. Online searches of Medline and Embase databases, as well as the gray literature, were performed up to December 2022. Included articles were randomized controlled trials that studied the use of LCBIs with additional anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone and had determined follow-up periods. Outcomes of interest were PTS development, moderate to severe PTS, major bleeding episodes, and quality-of-life measures. Subgroup analyses were performed for DVTs involving the iliac vein and/r common femoral vein. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and GRADE assessment tools.

RESULTS

Three trials were included in the final meta-analysis, the Post-thrombotic Syndrome after Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Deep Vein Thrombosis (CaVenT), Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT), and Ultrasound-accelerated Catheter-directed Thrombolysis Versus Anticoagulation for the Prevention of Post-thrombotic Syndrome (CAVA) trials, comprising 987 patients. Patients undergoing LCBIs had a reduced risk of PTS (relative risk [RR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.95; P = .006) and a lower risk of developing moderate to severe PTS (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.97; P = .03). LBCIs increased the risk of having a major bleed (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.08-3.82; P = .03). In the iliofemoral DVT subgroup analysis, there was a trend toward decreasing the risk of developing PTS and moderate to severe PTS (P = .12 and P = .05, respectively). There was no significant difference in quality-of-life score (as measured by the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study - Quality of Life/Symptoms) between the two groups (P = .51).

CONCLUSIONS

Pooling of current best evidence suggests that LCBIs in acute proximal DVT decreases the rate of PTS and moderate to severe PTS with a number needed to treat of 12 and 18, respectively. However, this is complicated by a significantly higher rate of major bleeding with a number needed to treat of 37. This evidence supports the use of LCBIs in selected patients, including those who are at low risk of major bleeding.

Acute venous problems: Integrating medical, surgical, and interventional treatments

"Acute venous problems" refers to a group of disorders that affect the veins and result in sudden and severe symptoms. They can be classified based on the pathological triggering mechanisms, such as thrombosis and/or mechanical compression, and their consequences, including symptoms, signs, and complications. The management and therapeutic approach depend on the severity of the disease, the location, and the involvement of the vein segment. Although summarizing these conditions can be challenging, the objective of this narrative review was to provide an overview of the most common acute venous problems. This will include an exhaustive yet concise and practical description of each condition. The multidisciplinary approach remains one of the major advantages in dealing with these conditions, maximizing the results and the prevention of complications.

Rheolytic thrombectomy using an AngioJet ZelanteDVT catheter or a Solent Omni catheter for patients with proximal vein thrombosis

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to investigate the preliminary safety and efficacy of rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) using an AngioJet Zelante DVT catheter or a Solent Omni catheter for acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 40 patients who were treated with an AngioJet RT between January 2019 and January 2021, and then the patients were divided into the ZelanteDVT group (n = 17) and the Solent group (n = 23). Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, technical success, clinical success, complications, and early follow-up were analysed.

RESULTS

No significant differences regarding demographics were detected (all p > .05). The technical success rates were both 100%. The ZelanteDVT group had a shorter duration of RT and a higher primary RT success than the Solent group (all p < .05), and the percentage of adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) was 29.4% in the ZelanteDVT group, which was significantly lower than the 73.9% in the Solent group (p = .010). The clinical success rates for the ZelanteDVT group and Solent group were 100% (17/17) and 95.7% (22/23), respectively, and these values were high in the two groups (p > .05). Apart from transient macroscopic haemoglobinuria occurring in all the patients during the first 24 hours post-RT, none of the patients in either group suffered other procedure-related adverse events or major complications. Minor complications included bleeding events in 21.7% (5/23) of the patients in the Solent group and one (5.9%) patient in the ZelanteDVT group (p > .05). At 6 months, the frequency of PTS was 5.9% (1/17) in the ZelanteDVT group and 17.4% (4/23) in the Solent group (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Both catheters are safe and effective in managing patients with proximal DVT, thus leading to improved clinical outcomes with few complications. The ZelanteDVT catheter was more effective than the Solent catheter in thrombectomy, thus allowing for faster extraction of the DVT with a shorter run time and lower proportions of patients with adjunctive CDT.

Endovascular Venous Interventions - A State-of-the-Art Review

Venous vascular diseases are an important clinical entity estimated to affect several million people worldwide. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common venous disease with a population variable prevalence of 122 to 160 persons per 100,000 per year, whereas pulmonary embolism (PE) affects up to 60 to 70 per 100 000 and carries much higher mortality. Chronic venous diseases, which cause symptoms like leg swelling, heaviness, pain, and discomfort, are most prevalent in the elderly and significantly impact their quality of life. Some estimate that chronic vascular diseases account for up to 2% of healthcare budgets in Western countries. Treating venous vascular disease includes using systemic anticoagulation and interventional therapies in some patient subsets. In this comprehensive review, we discuss endovascular treatment modalities in the management of venous vascular diseases.

Thrombus Signal on T1-Weighted Black-Blood MR Predicts Outcomes of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis

OBJECTIVES

 Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is an effective therapy for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, predicting the CDT outcomes remains elusive. We hypothesized that the thrombus signal on T1-weighted black-blood magnetic resonance (MR) can provide insight into CDT outcomes in acute DVT patients.

METHODS

 A total of 117 patients with acute iliofemoral DVT were enrolled for T1-weighted black-blood MR before CDT in this prospective study. Based on the signal contrast between thrombus and adjacent muscle, patients were categorized into the iso-intense thrombus (Iso-IT), hyper-intense thrombus (Hyper-IT), and mixed iso-/hyper-intense thrombi (Mixed-IT) groups. Immediate treatment outcome (i.e., vein patency) and long-term treatment outcome (i.e., the incidence rate of postthrombotic syndrome) were accessed by the same expert. Histological analysis and iron quantification were performed on thrombus samples to characterize the content of fibrin, collagen, and the ratio of Fe³⁺ to total iron.

RESULTS

 Compared to Mixed-IT and Hyper-IT groups, the Iso-IT group had the best lytic effect (90.5 ± 1.6% vs. 78.4 ± 2.6% vs. 46.5 ± 3.3%, p < 0.001), lowest bleeding ratio (0.0 vs. 11.8 vs. 13.3, p < 0.001), and the lowest incidence rate of postthrombotic syndrome on 24 months (3.6 vs. 18.4 vs. 63.4%, p < 0.001) following CDT. The Iso-IT group had a significantly lower ratio of Fe³⁺ to total iron (93.1 ± 3.2% vs. 97.2 ± 2.1%, p = 0.034) and a higher content of fibrin (12.5 ± 5.3% vs. 4.76 ± 3.18%, p = 0.023) than Hyper-IT.

CONCLUSION

 Thrombus signal characteristics on T1-weighted black-blood MR is associated with CDT outcomes and possesses potential to serve as a noninvasive approach to guide treatment decision making in acute DVT patients.

KEY POINTS

· Thrombus signal on T1-weighted black-blood MR is associated with lytic therapeutic outcome in acute DVT patients.. · Presence of iso-intense thrombus revealed by T1-weighted black-blood MRI is associated with successful thrombolysis, low bleeding ratio, and low incidence of the postthrombotic syndrome.. · T1-weighted thrombus signal characteristics may serve as a noninvasive imaging marker to predict CDT treatment outcomes and therefore guide treatment decision making in acute DVT patients..

AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients: Increase the risk of acute kidney injury?

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the risk of acute kidney injury in elderly patients compared with nonelderly patients undergoing AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy for treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis between November 1, 2014 and August 1, 2022 was conducted. Their baseline demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, procedural details, and postoperative course were reviewed.

Results

A total of 105 eligible patients were reviewed; 45 patients were in the elderly group, and 60 were in the nonelderly group. Except for age (p < 0.001), no significant differences regarding demographics were detected (p >0.05). Transient macroscopic hemoglobinuria occurred in all patients during the first 24 h post-AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy. The overall morbidity of acute kidney injury in the two groups was 11.4%, and the nonelderly group had a similar rate of acute kidney injury (8.3%) to the elderly group (15.6%). None of the 12 patients progressed to dialysis within the postoperative period, and the mean acute kidney injury recovery time of the elderly group was 5.86 ± 1.57 days, which was longer than the 3.60 ± .89 days of the nonelderly group (p = 0.017).

Conclusion

The use of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy for the treatment of patients with acute deep vein thrombosis is associated with a potential risk of acute kidney injury, which seems to have a comparable rate in elderly and nonelderly patients. acute kidney injury in the elderly group tends to need a longer recovery time, which requires postoperative vigilance for this population.

Society of Interventional Radiology Position Statement on the Endovascular Management of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

PURPOSE

To establish the updated position of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) on the endovascular management of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary writing group with expertise in treating venous diseases was convened by SIR. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies on the topic of interest. Recommendations were drafted and graded according to the updated SIR evidence grading system. A modified Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus agreement on the recommendation statements.

RESULTS

A total of 84 studies, including randomized trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, prospective single-arm studies, and retrospective studies were identified and included in the review. The expert writing group developed 17 recommendations that pertain to the care of patients with acute iliofemoral DVT with the use of endovascular venous interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

SIR considers endovascular thrombus removal to be an acceptable treatment option in selected patients with acute iliofemoral DVT. Careful individualized risk assessment, high-quality general DVT care, and close monitoring during and after procedures should be provided.

Endovascular Thrombus Removal for Treating Post-Partum Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous thrombectomy for treating postpartum iliofemoral vein thrombosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with continuous postpartum acute symptomatic iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis who were treated in our center, including all patients who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) or only catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) (study group), and patients that received simple anticoagulation treatment (control group). We evaluated the incidence of lower extremity postthrombotic syndrome, recanalization rate of lower extremity veins, and complications in the study and control groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 72 postpartum women were included in this study, including the PMT combined with CDT group (14 cases, 15 limbs), CDT alone group (26 cases, 27 limbs), and anticoagulant therapy alone group (32 cases, 34 limbs). The thrombectomy group completed the treatment with a technical success rate of 100%, and no serious bleeding complications occurred. The patency rate of lower limb veins in the thrombectomy group was 85.09 ± 16.51% after treatment and 82.60 ± 21.45% after 1 year. At the 1-year follow-up, the Villalta score in the study group was lower (1.90 ± 2.45 vs 8.50 ± 5.33, P < .001), and the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome was significantly different between the groups (17.50% in the study group vs 68.75% in the anticoagulant group, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower extremity venous thrombectomy is a safe and effective treatment for postpartum iliofemoral venous thrombosis. It can improve the patency rate of lower extremity veins and reduce the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome compared with anticoagulation alone.

Improvement following restoration of inline flow argues against comprehensive thrombus removal strategies and for selective stenting in acute symptomatic iliofemoral venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

Randomized trials have demonstrated the benefit of thrombus removal strategies in iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (IFDVT) in providing early symptom relief and decreasing the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), especially severe PTS. However, the impact of quantum of residual thrombus burden (RTB) on PTS as determined by intravascular ultrasound examination and the role of venous stenting in the acute setting have not been evaluated and represent the focus of this study.

METHODS

Sixty-nine limbs (65 patients) undergoing thrombus removal for acute symptomatic IFDVT between 2015 and 2021 formed the study cohort. The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) (range, 0-27) grade of swelling (GOS) (range, 0-4), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (range, 0-10) were evaluated initially and at 6, 12, and 24 months after thrombus removal. Quality of life was appraised using the CIVIQ-20 instrument. The extent of initial and RTB after the intervention was estimated using intravascular ultrasound examination. Grading was done as less than 50% (1), 50% to 99% (2), or 100% (3) of luminal thrombus fill within each segment (common femoral vein, external iliac vein, and common iliac vein) by a blinded rater and then combined to generate a total score. The use of stenting, both concurrent (severe residual stenosis/persistent occlusion) and delayed (quality of life impairing residual or recurrent symptoms), was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 69 limbs, 53 underwent pharmacomechanical/mechanical thrombectomy (PMT), whereas 16 patients underwent PMT and catheter-directed thrombolysis with restoration of inline flow in all limbs. Post-intervention VCSS improved from 6 to 2 at 24 months (P < .0001). GOS improved from 4 to 0 at 24 months (P < .0001). The VAS pain score went from 5 to 0 at 6 months (P < .0001) and remained at 0 at 12 months (P < .0001), but increased to 3 at 24 months (P = .02). The CIVIQ-20 score improved from 38 to 22 (P = .001) over a median follow-up of 19 months. The median RTB total score improved from 9 to 4 (P < .0001). There was no impact of RTB total score (<3 vs >3) on VCSS (P = NS), GOS (P = NS), VAS pain score (P = NS) or CIVIQ-20 score (P = NS) at the various time points. Concurrent stenting was used in 23 limbs (33%) and delayed stenting was carried out in 10 limbs (14%). The median time to delayed stenting was 4 months after the initial thrombus removal intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing PMT or PMT with catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute symptomatic IFDVT, the restoration of inline flow seems to be adequate to provide symptom relief and decrease the incidence of PTS. The extent of RTB does not seem to impact the VCSS, GOS, VAS pain score, or quality of life after such restoration. Stenting can be pursued selectively in the acute setting to help restore inline flow.

The association between iliac vein compression degree and characteristics of first diagnosed left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the association between the left common iliac vein (CIV) compression degree and characteristics of first diagnosed left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

Patients and methods

This was a single-center retrospective observational study. Between January 2015 and June 2022, first diagnosed left lower extremity DVT patients with enhanced computed tomography of lower extremities were included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, risk factors, DVT characteristics, and CIV compression degree were collected and analyzed. Logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of iliofemoral or mixed DVT vs. compression percentage. The association between compression percentage and iliofemoral or mixed DVT was evaluated on a continuous scale with restricted cubic splines (RCS). The association between compression percentage and thrombus burden was evaluated using the Spearman test.

Results

A total of 196 (mean age, 61.8 ± 16.1 years; 86 males) patients were included. The median CIV compression percentage in iliofemoral or mixed DVT patients was significantly greater than in non-iliofemoral or non-mixed DVT, respectively (64.4 vs. 46.6%, p < 0.001; 67.8 vs. 54.8%, p = 0.004). CIV compression >50% was associated with significantly increased morbidity of iliofemoral DVT (adjusted OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.58-5.52; p = 0.001) or mixed DVT (adjusted OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.19-4.81; p = 0.014). RCS showed that a greater compression percentage was associated with a continuously increased OR of iliofemoral DVT (overall p = 0.003, non-linear p = 0.577) or mixed DVT (overall p = 0.020, non-linear p = 0.771). CIV compression percentage had a positive correlation with thrombus burden (rs = 0.284, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A greater left CIV compression percentage may be associated with increasing likelihood of more proximal location and severe clot extent in first diagnosed left lower extremity DVT.

Evolution of deep vein thrombosis treatment from leeches to mechanical thrombectomy

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is one of the most common diseases in developed countries with significant socioeconomic consequences. The severity of DVT lies in the potential for life-threatening pulmonary embolism and the development of chronic venous insufficiency, referred to as post-thrombotic syndrome. Virchow contributed to the understanding of the pathophysiological events that lead to thrombosis by describing three basic risk mechanisms. The first therapeutic attempts in the 17th century included venepuncture and the application of leeches. The first anticoagulant drug was heparin, which entered clinical practice after 1935. Subsequent commercialization of oral vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) and the advent of low molecular weight heparin along with compression therapy allowed the expansion of outpatient treatment of DVT. Recently, new oral anticoagulants have been introduced, leading to improved safety due to lower risk of bleeding complications and simplification of the treatment process. The next step in the development of therapeutic options are invasive methods of early thrombus removal, which significantly shorten the process and aim to reduce the occurrence of late complications. These methods include local catheter-directed thrombolysis using tissue plasminogen activator, mechanical thrombectomy and their combination called pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy. The latter is currently used in patients with acute ilio-femoral DVT.

The Importance of Early Thrombus Removal

Historically, anticoagulation has been the primary treatment for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with or without thrombolysis. Despite large amounts of clinical research data supporting an ‘open vein hypothesis’, which favours early thrombus removal, clinicians have been hesitant to take this option due to a historically high risk of major bleeding and a few notable studies that failed to show any meaningful benefit. The ATTRACT trial failed to show the benefit of using pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) for iliofemoral and femoropopliteal DVT but did result in more bleeding. However, the CaVent study before it revealed a significant reduction in post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) for patients with iliofemoral and femoral DVT after long-term follow-up past 24 months that grew over time. Since these trials, there have been significant advancements in magnetic resonance and CT venography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), venous stenting and thrombectomy catheters meaning there is little to no need for adjunct thrombolytics. Results from ongoing research such as CLEAR-DVT reflect the advances in modern technology.

A unique case of acute bilateral internal iliac deep vein thrombosis leading to right iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction

Venous thromboembolism has been associated with high morbidity and mortality, with a cost burden for the U.S. health care system owing to secondary complications such as pulmonary embolism and post-thrombotic syndrome. The current standard of therapy for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is anticoagulation. For patients with venous outflow obstruction of the iliac vein system, several minimally invasive recanalization techniques are now available. In the present report, we have described a case of bilateral internal iliac DVT that had progressed to right-sided iliofemoral DVT in a young athletic adult, in the absence of anatomic abnormalities, that was treated with thrombolysis-free mechanical thrombectomy.

Predictors of Clinical Outcomes of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To identify the baseline patient characteristics that predict who will benefit from pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) multicenter randomized trial, 381 patients with acute iliofemoral DVT underwent PCDT and anticoagulation or anticoagulation alone. The correlations between baseline factors and venous clinical outcomes were evaluated over 24 months using post hoc regression analyses. Interaction terms were examined to evaluate for differential effects by treatment arm.

RESULTS

Patients with clinically severe DVT (higher baseline Villalta score) experienced greater effects of PCDT in improving 24-month venous outcomes, including moderate or severe postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) (odds ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs] per unit increase in the baseline Villalta scores were as follows: for PCDT, OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.15]; for control, OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.12-1.29]; Pinteraction = .03), PTS severity (between-arm differences in the Villalta [Pinteraction = .004] and Venous Clinical Severity Scale [VCSS] [Pinteraction = .002)] scores), and quality of life (between-arm difference in the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life score; Pinteraction = .025). Patients with previous DVT had greater effects of PCDT on 24-month PTS severity than those in patients without previous DVT (mean [95% CI] between-arm difference in the Villalta score, 4.2 [1.56-6.84] vs 0.9 [-0.44 to 2.26], Pinteraction = .03; mean [95% CI] between-arm difference in the VCSS score, 2.6 [0.94-4.21] vs 0.3 [-0.58 to 1.14], Pinteraction = .02). The effects of PCDT on some but not all outcomes were greater in patients presenting with left-sided DVT (Villalta PTS severity, Pinteraction = .04; venous ulcer, Pinteraction = .0499) or a noncompressible popliteal vein (PTS, Pinteraction = .02). The effects of PCDT did not vary by sex, race, ethnicity, body mass index, symptom duration, hypertension, diabetes, or hypercholesterolemia.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute iliofemoral DVT, greater presenting clinical severity (higher baseline Villalta score) and a history of previous DVT predict enhanced benefits from PCDT.

Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis: Etiologies, Diagnosis, and Updates in Therapeutic Strategies

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) is responsible for 4 to 10% of all deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Untreated UEDVT can lead to significant disability secondary to the postthrombotic syndrome. To date, there are no randomized trials specifically comparing different therapeutic strategies. Ultimately, optimal management of UEDVT depends on the underlying etiology, patient symptoms, and degree of thrombosis, with supporting evidence primarily extrapolated from lower extremity DVT data. This article will review the classification, presentation, and diagnosis of both primary and secondary UEDVT. In addition, it will discuss updates in clinical guidelines, anticoagulation, endovascular and surgical treatment strategies.

Endovascular Management of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is frequently encountered in clinical practice. Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a common sequela of DVT and encompasses a wide variety of symptoms, including severe pain, edema, and ulceration, all of which may contribute to a negative impact on quality of life. Studies have demonstrated that acute thrombosis of the iliofemoral venous segment is correlated with high rates of PTS, increased severity of symptoms, and high rates of thrombus recurrence, despite patients receiving treatment with standard-of-care anticoagulation therapy. Endovascular interventions, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and mechanical thrombectomy, have generated significant interest as a method for reduction of short-term symptom severity and potential reduction of downstream PTS severity. While there is high-quality evidence evaluating the role of catheter-directed and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for acute iliofemoral DVT, newer mechanical-only devices that utilize thrombectomy without fibrinolytic medication are less studied. Currently, there are limited data evaluating the efficacy and safety of these treatment modalities, although investigations are ongoing.

Impact of concomitant popliteal vein thrombosis in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis treated with endovascular early thrombus removal

Summary: Background: Catheter-based thrombus removal (CBTR) reduces the risk of moderate to severe post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IF-DVT). However, the impact of concomitant popliteal DVT on clinical and duplex sonographic outcomes is unknown. Patients and methods: In this post-hoc analysis including the entire cohort of the randomized controlled BERNUTIFUL trial (48 patients), we compared clinical (incidence/severity of PTS assessed by Villalta score and revised venous clinical severity scores, rVCSS), disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL, CIVIQ-20 survey) and duplex sonographic outcomes (patency, reflux, post-thrombotic lesions) at 12 months follow-up between patients with IF-DVT with and without concomitant popliteal DVT treated by CBTR. Results: Overall, 48 IF-DVT patients were included (48% men, median age of 50 years), of whom 17 (35%) presented with popliteal DVT. At baseline, patients with popliteal DVT were older, had a higher body mass index and more important leg swelling. At 12 months, freedom from PTS (93% vs 87%, P=0.17), median total Villalta score (1 vs 1.5; P=0.46), rVCSS (2 vs 1.5, P=0.5) and disease-specific QOL (24 points vs 24 points, P=0.72) were similar between patient with and without popliteal DVT, respectively. Duplex sonographic outcomes were similar, except for more frequent popliteal post-thrombotic lesions and reflux (P=0.02) in patients with popliteal DVT. Conclusions: Relevant clinical outcomes 1 year after successful CBTR were favorable, regardless of the presence or absence of concomitant popliteal DVT. However, post-thrombotic popliteal vein lesions and reflux are more frequent in IF-DVT patients with popliteal involvement. Their impact on long-term outcomes remains to be investigated.

Assessment of the lymphatic system by indirect lymphography in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Alterations in lower extremity lymph drainage caused by chronic venous obstruction (CVO) have not been well studied, partially because of a lack of standardized imaging modalities to assess the quality of lymphatic drainage in the lower extremities of patients with post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). However, these changes are likely to have an impact on the severity of the disease and clinical outcomes of interventions. In the present study, we investigated the feasibility and diagnostic value of preintervention indirect lymphography in patients with CVO and their pre- and postintervention Villalta scores.

METHODS

A total of 17 patients (21 limbs) with iliofemoral and caval CVO were included in the study between 2017 and 2018. The deep and superficial lymphatic vessels in both legs were assessed before venous recanalization and stenting. The quality of lymphatic flow was compared between the legs with CVO and healthy legs. Moreover, the correlation between the lymphatic changes and clinical severity of PTS was evaluated using the Villalta score and CEAP (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology) classification.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 44 ± 12 years, and 10 patients (59%) were women. The patients had undergone treatment at a mean of 25 ± 6 months after their first episode of deep vein thrombosis. Five patients (29%) had had recurrent deep vein thrombosis. The mean pre- and postinterventional Villalta score was 10.5 ± 1.46 and 9.27 ± 1.12, respectively (P = .0096). Using the CEAP classification, four legs were class 5, seven were class 4, and three each were class 3 and 2. The primary and secondary patency rate was 70.5% and 82.5% after a mean follow-up of 18 months, respectively. Indirect lymphography of the superficial and deep lymphatic systems was completed before intervention in both legs for all 17 patients (21 legs). According to the qualitative criteria, abnormal lymphatic vessel function was found in 35.2% of the superficial and 58.8% of the deep lymphatic vessels of the affected legs. Further analysis revealed abnormal function of the deep lymphatic vessels in all patients with moderate to severe PTS according to the Villalta score.

CONCLUSIONS

Indirect lymphography is a feasible diagnostic tool to use for the evaluation of the function of lymphatic vessels. Impaired drainage of the deep lymphatic system was found in all our patients with moderate to severe PTS. The clinical significance of these lymphatic changes is not clear; however, an association between clinical severity and outcomes is possible.

Outcomes from a tertiary care center using a catheter thrombectomy system for managing acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to report a large, single-center experience using the ClotTriever thrombectomy system (Inari Medical, Irvine, CA) for the management of acute iliofemoral (IF) deep vein thrombosis (DVT). One limitation of all endovascular devices for the treatment of acute IF-DVT has been the inability to completely remove all acute thrombus and the need for adjunctive thrombolysis with its attendant risk of bleeding complications.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of consecutive patients with acute IF-DVT treated with the ClotTriever thrombectomy system (Inari Medical) is reported. Procedural efficacy was evaluated by an independent core imaging laboratory (Syntactx, New York, NY). Both procedural and in-hospital safety were assessed during the index hospitalization. The treated vein patency was assessed using duplex ultrasound at 30 days after the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were included in the present retrospective review, 40 of whom (40%) had contraindications to thrombolytic therapy. In terms of efficacy, 93 patients (97%) had ≥75% thrombus removal. During the index hospitalization, two patients (2%) had experienced a symptomatic pulmonary embolus. However, no mortality, major bleeding, or device-related complications had occurred in the study population. Of the 96 patients, 64 had undergone duplex ultrasound at 30 days after the procedure. Of the 64 patients, 62 had normal flow (97%), 53 (83%) had normal compressibility, and 11 (17%) had partial compressibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The ClotTriever thrombectomy catheter was both safe and effective in our cohort of patients with acute IF-DVT outside a randomized clinical trial.

Postthrombotic syndrome and quality of life after deep vein thrombosis in patients treated with edoxaban versus warfarin

Background

Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a long-term complication after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and can affect quality of life (QoL). Pathogenesis is not fully understood but inadequate anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists is a known risk factor for the development of PTS.

Objectives

To compare the prevalence of PTS after acute DVT and the long-term QoL following DVT between patients treated with edoxaban or warfarin.

Methods

We performed a long-term follow-up study in a subset of patients with DVT who participated in the Hokusai-VTE trial between 2010 and 2012 (NCT00986154). Primary outcome was the prevalence of PTS, defined by the Villalta score. The secondary outcome was QoL, assessed by validated disease-specific (VEINES-QOL) and generic health-related (SF-36) questionnaires.

Results

Between 2017 and 2020, 316 patients were enrolled in 26 centers in eight countries, of which 168 (53%) patients had been assigned to edoxaban and 148 (47%) to warfarin during the Hokusai-VTE trial. Clinical, demographic, and thrombus-specific characteristics were comparable for both groups. Mean (SD) time since randomization in the Hokusai-VTE trial was 7.0 (1.0) years. PTS was diagnosed in 85 (51%) patients treated with edoxaban and 62 (42%) patients treated with warfarin (adjusted odds ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.6). Mean differences in QoL scores between treatment groups were not clinically relevant.

Conclusion

Contrary to our hypothesis, the prevalence of PTS tended to be higher in patients treated with edoxaban compared with warfarin. No differences in QoL were observed. Further research is warranted to unravel the role of anticoagulant therapy on development of PTS.

Efficacy of one-stop endovascular intervention in treatment of left iliac vein compression syndrome complicated with deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effect and safety of one-stop endovascular intervention in treatment of left iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) complicated with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of lower limbs.

METHODS

Clinical data of 26 patients with secondary DVT due to IVCS admitted in the Department of Vascular Surgery, Hebei General Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent one-stop endovascular intervention procedure, including ultrasound-guided deep venipuncture, Angiojet catheter aspiration, iliac vein balloon dilation, stent implantation and simultaneous filter retrieval. The operation time and catheter aspiration time were documented; the preoperative and postoperative left lower extremity deep vein venous patency, circumferences of bilateral limbs at 15 cm above the knee and 10 cm below the knee, and the levels of hemoglobin, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspertate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin and indirect bilirubin were measured. The incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and iliac vein stent patency were recorded through follow-up.

RESULTS

The one-stop endovascular intervention was successfully performed in 26 patients, with the operation time of (171±35) min and the thrombolysis time of (263±89) s. After treatment, the left lower extremity deep vein venous patency, circumferences of bilateral limbs at 15 cm above the knee and 10 cm below the knee were decreased (all P<0.01); the hemoglobin level were decreased, the creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin and indirect bilirubin levels were increased (all P<0.01). Patients were followed up for 1-12 months. Stent thrombosis occurred in 1 patient 7 months after procedure, and the symptoms were improved after conservative treatment; the stents were unobstructed in all patients, 1 patient had stent mural thrombosis, in whom the stent blood flow was not affected. No PTS was observed during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The one-stop endovascular interventional treatment of IVCS complicated with DVT of left lower limb is safe and effective. Attention should be paid to the changes of liver and kidney function caused by catheter aspiration during the treatment, and corresponding intervention should be given in time to avoid the occurrence of related complications.