Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein in children with haemophilia B (Kids B-LONG): results from a multicentre, non-randomised phase 3 study

Factor IX stimulants in preclinical and early phase trials for hemophilia B treatment

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia B is a X-linked rare inherited bleeding disorder characterized by coagulation factor IX (FIX) deficiency. Therapy for hemophilia B is aimed at replacing the FIX deficiency by means of several plasma-derived or recombinant FIX products. The recent availability of recombinant FIX concentrates with a prolonged FIX half-life represented a great technological advance, permitting more spaced drug infusions and reducing treatment burden among hemophilia B patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the main preclinical and phase 1/2 studies investigating the innovative hemostatic products for hemophilia B replacement therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The significant recent technological advantages in the treatment of hemophilia B has led to the development of innovative FIX products aimed at further extending FIX half-life and using increasingly effective and convenient modes of administration. These novel hemostatic agents, currently in the preclinical or early clinical phase of development, carry the potential of improving patients' health status and quality of life. Continuous research is anyway needed to offer such patients a concrete chance of conducting a normal existence, like to non-affected age-matched individuals.

Real-world usage and effectiveness of recombinant factor VIII/factor IX Fc in hemophilia A/B: final data from the 24-month, prospective, noninterventional PREVENT study in Germany

Background

Real-world experience with efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor [F]VIII Fc fusion protein [rFVIIIFc]) and eftrenonacog alfa (a recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein [rFIXFc]) is needed to bridge evidence gaps.

Objectives

To describe rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc usage and effectiveness over a 24-month prospective period.

Methods

PREVENT (NCT03055611), a noninterventional study across 25 German hemophilia treatment centers, enrolled previously treated persons with hemophilia A and B (all ages/severities) on individualized rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis before/at enrollment. Primary endpoints included annualized bleeding rate (ABR), injection frequency (IF), and factor consumption (FC). Additionally, up to 12 months of retrospective FVIII/FIX data were collected. Physician and patient satisfaction, and safety outcomes were also assessed.

Results

Overall, 150 patients received ≥1 rFVIIIFc dose and 47 patients received ≥1 rFIXFc dose, with median prospective follow-up of 20.6 and 21.0 months, respectively. rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc demonstrated low median ABR (0.5/1.7), annualized IF (121.8/52.2 injections/y), and FC (4611.7/2423.9 IU/kg) in line with product labels. Compared with previous FVIII/FIX, there was a 56.0% reduction in ABR for rFVIIIFc (rate ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64), with no change for rFIXFc (rate ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31); rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc reduced annualized IF (rFVIIIFc, mean difference, -31.7; 95% CI, -40.3 to -23.1; rFIXFc, mean difference, -37.3; 95% CI, -46.9 to -27.8), while FC remained stable (rFVIIIFc, +374.1; 95% CI, +46.8 to +701.3; rFIXFc, +503.9; 95% CI, +95.4 to +912.4). Most physicians and patients were satisfied or highly satisfied with rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc. rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc were well tolerated, with no inhibitor development or treatment-related serious adverse events.

Conclusion

Real-world PREVENT data complement phase 3 trials and show that individualized rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis provided stable bleed protection with low IF and maintained FC. Compared with previous FVIII, ABR was considerably reduced with rFVIIIFc, with stable annualized FC. For rFIXFc, bleed protection was maintained vs previous FIX while reducing annualized IF.

Prophylaxis with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein reduces the risk of bleeding and delays time to first spontaneous bleed event in previously untreated patients with haemophilia B: A post hoc analysis of the PUPs B-LONG study

OBJECTIVES

Haemophilia B (HB), characterised by deficient factor IX (FIX), leads to spontaneous bleeds. Severe cases require prophylactic FIX replacement. This post hoc analysis assessed the first spontaneous bleeds among previously untreated patients (PUPs) with HB treated with recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) (NCT02234310) to identify factors influencing bleeds.

METHODS

Subjects included paediatric PUPs with HB (≤2 IU/dL endogenous FIX). Analyses described treatment patterns (on demand [OD] vs. prophylaxis) and prophylaxis type (started on vs. switched to prophylaxis). Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed the time to first spontaneous bleed, including median time to event and fitting models with predictors for treatment regimen and/or baseline age.

RESULTS

PUPs B-LONG enrolled 33 subjects. Baseline age did not influence the time to first spontaneous bleed for any rFIXFc regimen. Those who started on prophylaxis with rFIXFc (n = 11), compared with those treated OD (n = 22), had an extended time to first spontaneous bleed. Starting prophylaxis afforded a 93% reduced risk of first spontaneous bleed versus starting OD (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.071 [0.009-0.592]) (p = .015).

CONCLUSION

rFIXFc prophylaxis, particularly starting early, reduced the risk of bleeding and delayed time to first spontaneous bleed compared with rFIXFc OD. Hence, initial treatment regimens impact bleed patterns in paediatric PUPs.

Cost-Effectiveness of Recombinant Factor IX Fc Prophylaxis and Recombinant Factor IX On-Demand Treatment in Patients with Haemophilia B Without Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant factor IX (rFIX) and recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) are standard half-life and extended half-life FIX replacement therapies, respectively, and represent established treatment options indicated for adults and children with haemophilia B. These FIX replacement therapies can be administered as prophylaxis (to prevent bleeding) or 'on-demand' (to stop bleeding). This analysis aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of once-weekly prophylaxis with rFIXFc versus on-demand treatment with rFIX in patients with haemophilia B without inhibitors in the Italian healthcare setting.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to assess a hypothetical cohort of adolescent or adult male patients (≥ 12 years) with haemophilia B (FIX level of ≤ 2 IU/dL) without inhibitors. Model inputs were derived from the pivotal phase 3 clinical studies for rFIXFc and rFIX, published literature and assumptions when published data were unavailable. The model employed a lifelong time horizon with 6-monthly transitions between health states, and it estimated total costs, total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), number of bleeds, number of surgeries and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

rFIXFc prophylaxis was associated with lower total costs per patient (€5,308,625 versus €6,564,510) and greater total QALYs per patient (15.936 versus 11.943) compared with rFIX on-demand; rFIXFc prophylaxis was therefore the dominant treatment strategy. The model also demonstrated that rFIXFc prophylaxis was associated with fewer incremental bleeds (- 682.29) and surgeries (- 0.39) compared with rFIX on-demand.

CONCLUSIONS

rFIXFc prophylaxis provides improved health outcomes and lower costs, and represents a cost-effective treatment option compared with rFIX on-demand for adolescent and adult male patients with haemophilia B. This comparative assessment of cost-effectiveness should help to inform both clinicians and healthcare policy makers when making treatment decisions for patients with haemophilia B.

Recombinant factor IX Fc for the treatment of hemophilia B

Current hemophilia B treatment guidelines recommend routine prophylaxis with factor IX (FIX) replacement products, tailored to maintain plasma activity at levels that will prevent bleeds. However, plasma FIX activity may not be the primary determinant or best indicator of hemostatic efficacy due to its extravascular distribution. FIX replacement therapy has evolved to include extended half-life (EHL) products that provide effective bleed protection when administered at intervals of 7 days or longer. rFIXFc is a recombinant fusion protein with an extended circulation time. rFIXFc has a biodistribution profile consistent with distribution into extravascular space, where it may support hemostasis at sites of vessel injury independent of circulating plasma activity levels. The safety and efficacy of rFIXFc prophylaxis is well established in adults, adolescents and children including previously untreated patients with hemophilia B, with substantial evidence from clinical trials and real-world clinical practice. This review describes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of rFIXFc, summarizes available safety and efficacy data, and evaluates the use of rFIXFc in special populations. Current hemophilia B treatment challenges, including target FIX plasma levels, perioperative use, and management of patients with comorbidities, are discussed together with the potential role of EHL products in the future treatment landscape of hemophilia B.

Real-World Effectiveness of rFIXFc Prophylaxis in Patients with Haemophilia B Switched from Standard Half-Life Therapy in Three European Countries

INTRODUCTION

The current study describes real-world clinical outcomes and factor usage among patients with haemophilia B switching from standard half-life factor IX (SHL FIX) treatment to recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) prophylaxis in European treatment centres.

METHODS

This non-interventional, retrospective, multicentre chart review evaluated medical records from adult and paediatric patients with haemophilia B in Denmark, Germany and the UK. Patients had documented SHL FIX treatment, on-demand or prophylaxis, for ≥ 6 months before starting rFIXFc prophylaxis, and subsequent data for ≥ 6 months afterwards (up to 24 months). Primary endpoints included annualised bleeding rates (ABRs), prophylactic factor consumption and injection frequency.

RESULTS

Data from 30 patients (24/30 [80.0%] with severe disease) showed overall mean (standard deviation, SD) ABRs of 4.7 (6.3) on SHL FIX treatment and 1.7 (2.3) after switching to rFIXFc prophylaxis. The reduction in mean (SD) ABRs was greater when switching from SHL FIX on-demand treatment (n = 6), with a decrease from 10.5 (9.9) to 2.6 (4.5), than when switching from SHL FIX prophylaxis (n = 24), with a decrease from 3.3 (4.3) to 1.5 (1.4). Among prior SHL FIX prophylaxis patients, switching to rFIXFc prophylaxis increased the proportion of those with zero bleeds from 21.7% to 45.8% during the 6 months before and after switching, respectively. In the total population, five of six target joints (83.3%) present when patients started rFIXFc prophylaxis subsequently resolved. In patients switching from SHL FIX prophylaxis to rFIXFc prophylaxis, mean (SD) weekly injection frequency was reduced by 1.0 (0.7) and mean (SD) factor consumption was reduced by 27.7 (49.6) IU/kg/week.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of rFIXFc prophylaxis in real-world clinical practice. Improvements in both clinical effectiveness and factor usage associated with rFIXFc prophylaxis may potentially reduce patient burden and improve quality of life.

Long-term outcomes of prophylaxis with a recombinant factor VIII Fc or recombinant factor IX Fc in patients with hemophilia previously treated on demand

Background

Prophylactic factor replacement therapy is recommended over on-demand treatment for preserving long-term joint health in hemophilia. Extended half-life products, including efmoroctocog alfa/eftrenonacog alfa (recombinant factor VIII [FVIII]/FIX Fc fusion proteins; herein rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc), have the potential to reduce treatment burden with less frequent administration and improve bleed prevention.

Objectives

We report post hoc data from patients with hemophilia A or B (HA/HB) who switched from prestudy on-demand FVIII/FIX to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis at the start of A-LONG/B-LONG or start of/during ASPIRE/B-YOND phase 3 studies.

Methods

Patients with ≥6 months rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis were enrolled. Treatment exposure, dosing, annualized bleeding rates, joint health, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes were assessed. Results were also stratified by age.

Results

Sixty-seven patients with HA and 50 with HB were analyzed; ≥60% were from regions outside Europe/North America, predominately those aged 12 to ‍25 years. No subjects returned to on-demand treatment postswitch.After switch to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis, median annualized bleeding rates were reduced and sustained at low levels with stable factor usage across age groups (median treatment duration: 4.8/3.6 years). HRQoL outcomes improved for all ages; most pronounced changes were in the sports and leisure and physical health domains. After switch to rFVIIIFc prophylaxis, total modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score and joints with pain decreased in 64.6% and 29.2% of patients with HA. Insufficient data from patients with HB limited joint health evaluation of rFIXFc.

Conclusions

Findings add to existing evidence and demonstrate the clinical and HRQoL benefits of switching patients from on-demand treatment to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis.

Recombinant factor IX Fc for major surgery in hemophilia B: factor IX plasma activity levels and effective hemostasis

Background

Major surgical procedures are associated with significant bleeding risk and infectious complications in patients with hemophilia, which may be minimized by factor replacement. Monitoring perioperative factor levels guides dosing to maintain adequate levels for hemostatic control.

Objectives

We report prospectively collected post hoc surgical data in patients with hemophilia B who underwent major surgery with extended half-life recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) in phase 3 studies (B-LONG/Kids B-LONG and B-YOND).

Methods

Achieved FIX plasma levels were described for those who underwent major surgeries with ≥1 peak and/or predose FIX assessment available on the day of surgery (Day 0 [D0]) from the central laboratory. Dosing, injection frequency, adverse events, and hemostatic responses were assessed. Two representative cases were described further including blood loss, transfusions, and concomitant medication assessment.

Results

Of 35 major surgeries, 17 (N = 16 subjects) with sufficient FIX measurements were included in this analysis; 13 of 17 surgeries were orthopedic. On D0, a median loading (preoperative) dose of 101.1 International Units (IU)/kg/injection achieved a median peak FIX of 103.3 IU/dL. Across postoperative Days 1 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 14, the median predose levels were 75.1 IU/dL with 1 injection/d, 71.6 IU/dL with 0 to 1 injection/d, and 43.2 IU/dL with 0 to 1 injection/d, respectively. Hemostasis was rated excellent (14 of 16) or good (2 of 16) across surgeries. Both case studies (knee arthroscopy and ankle fusion) illustrate measured FIX levels with rFIXFc.

Conclusion

The aggregate analysis and representative cases of major surgeries demonstrate that rFIXFc can achieve FIX levels for effective hemostasis during invasive high-risk procedures.

Post hoc longitudinal assessment of the efficacy and safety of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein in hemophilia B

Long-term efficacy and safety of the extended half-life recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) has been established among previously treated patients with severe hemophilia B in 2 phase 3 trials (B-LONG [#NCT01027364] and Kids B-LONG [#NCT01440946]) and a long-term extension study (B-YOND [#NCT01425723]). In this study, we report post hoc analyses of pooled longitudinal data for up to 6.5 years for rFIXFc prophylaxis. In the B-LONG study, subjects ≥12 years received weekly dose-adjusted prophylaxis (WP; starting dose, 50 IU/kg), individualized interval-adjusted prophylaxis (IP; initially, 100 IU/kg every 10 days), or on-demand dosing. In the Kids B-LONG study, subjects <12 years received 50 to 60 IU/kg every 7 days, adjusted as needed. In the B-YOND study, subjects received WP (20-100 IU/kg every 7 days), IP (100 IU/kg every 8-16 days), modified prophylaxis, or on-demand dosing; switching between treatment groups was permitted. A total of 123 subjects from B-LONG and 30 from Kids B-LONG study were included, of whom 93 and 27, respectively, enrolled in the B-YOND study. The median cumulative duration of treatment was 3.63 years (range, 0.003-6.48 years) in B-LONG/B-YOND and 2.88 years (range, 0.30-4.80 years) in Kids B-LONG/B-YOND group. Annualized bleed rates (ABRs) remained low, annualized factor consumption remained stable, and adherence remained high throughout treatment. Low ABRs were also maintained in subjects with dosing intervals ≥14 days or with target joints at baseline. Complete resolution of evaluable target joints and no recurrence in 90.2% of baseline target joints during follow-up were observed. rFIXFc prophylaxis was associated with sustained clinical benefits, including long-term bleed prevention and target joint resolution, for severe hemophilia B.

Recombinant factor IX Fc prophylaxis reduces pain and increases levels of physical activity, with sustained, long-term improvements in patients with hemophilia B: post hoc analysis of phase III trials using patient-reported outcomes

Background

Pain is a common symptom of hemophilia that may adversely affect patients' quality of life (QoL). Previous post hoc analyses of prophylaxis with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) have been published for adults and adolescents, demonstrating improvements in health-related QoL (HRQoL) when assessed by the haemophilia-specific QoL (HaemAQoL) questionnaire.

Objective

To describe in depth the evolution of QoL, pain- and activity-related domains and questions for pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with hemophilia B treated with rFIXFc prophylaxis.

Design

A post hoc analysis of data from a series of clinical trials.

Methods

This post hoc, long-term analysis assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the Kids B-LONG (NCT01440946: pediatric) and B-LONG (NCT01027364: adults and adolescents) parent studies and the B-YOND (NCT01425723: all age groups) extension study.

Results

Ninety-two adult and adolescent patients that started in the B-LONG study were assessed, with a median (range) duration of follow-up of 58.9 (0.0-78.4) months. The Haem-A-QoL total score was significantly reduced from baseline by 4.45 (p ⩽ 0.01), as were the subdomains 'physical health' (9.10; p = 0.001), 'sports and leisure' (11.25; p ⩽ 0.01), 'treatment' (2.69; p = 0.05), and 'view of self' (5.81; p = 0.002). Thirty pediatric patients that started in the Kids B-LONG study were assessed, with a median (min-max) duration of follow-up of 36.7 (9.0-59.9) months. The high level of satisfaction demonstrated by the PROs at baseline was maintained.

Conclusion

rFIXFc prophylaxis reduced perceived pain and increased levels of physical activity with sustained, long-term improvements in QoL in adult and adolescent patients with hemophilia B and maintained high QoL scores in pediatric patients.

Eftrenonacog Alfa: A Review in Haemophilia B

Eftrenonacog alfa (Alprolix^®) is an extended half-life recombinant factor IX (rFIX)-Fc fusion protein (hereafter referred to as rFIXFc). Administered as an intravenous bolus, it is approved for prophylactic use and the treatment of bleeding in patients with haemophilia B in various countries worldwide, including those of the EU, as well as the USA. In multinational, phase III trials, rFIXFc was effective for the prophylaxis, perioperative management or on-demand treatment of bleeding in male patients with severe haemophilia B regardless of age and irrespective of whether or not they had been previously treated with FIX replacement products. Prophylactic efficacy was maintained over the longer term (up to 5 years) in previously treated patients. rFIXFc effectiveness in the real-world setting is supported by results of prospective studies, as well as the outcomes of several retrospective trials. rFIXFc was well tolerated in clinical trials in previously treated and untreated children, adolescents and/or adults with severe haemophilia B. Thus, rFIXFc continues to represent a useful treatment option among the haemophilia B patient population.

Current factor IX replacement options for hemophilia B and the challenges ahead

INTRODUCTION

Therapy for hemophilia B is aimed at replacing the congenital deficiency of coagulation factor IX (FIX). For replacement therapy, several FIX concentrates derived from donated human plasma or engineered by recombinant DNA technology are currently commercially available. The use of these products is well established and permit patients a relatively normal life. To further improve treatment efficacy, recombinant FIX products with a prolonged half-life have been developed, allowing relaxed prophylactic dosing and reducing treatment burden.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we explore the current FIX replacement options for hemophilia B patients by analyzing the outcomes of their main clinical trials. We cover advances in the FIX molecules with extended half-life (EHL). Published literature on products for replacement of hemophilia B was retrieved using PubMed with no temporal limits.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent introduction of recombinant EHL FIX products has represented a major advance in the therapeutic management of hemophilia B patients, permitting both a reduction of treatment burden and improving patients' compliance to prophylaxis and, ultimately, quality of life.

New directions to develop therapies for people with hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

The past few decades have seen a tremendous advancement in the management of hemophilia. Whether it is improved methods to attenuate critical viruses, recombinant bioengineering with decreased immunogenicity, extended half-life replacement therapies to mitigate the burden of repeated infusion treatments, novel nonreplacement products to avoid the drawback of inhibitor development with its attractive subcutaneous administration and then the introduction of gene therapy, the management has trodden a long way.

AREAS COVERED

This expert review describes the progress in the treatment of hemophilia over the years. We discuss, in detail, the past and current therapies, their benefits, drawbacks, along with relevant studies leading to approval, efficacy and safety profile, ongoing trials, and future prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

The technological advances in the treatment of hemophilia with convenient modes of administration and innovative modalities offer a chance for a normal existence of the patients living with this disease. However, it is imperative for clinicians to be aware of the potential adverse effects and the need for further studies to establish causality or chance association of these events with novel agents. Thus, it is crucial for clinicians to engage patients and their families in informed decision-making and tailor individual concerns and necessities.

Long-term prophylaxis: what are our options and how to define success?

Currently, we are at an enviable place in hemophilia treatment. Although full prophylaxis with standard half-life recombinant or plasma-derived factor concentrates has been definitively shown to be inadequate for full protection against bleeding and arthropathy, a number of novel therapies with improved hemostatic enhancement are clinically available or in promising clinical trials. In order to compare outcomes among a number of very efficacious therapies, it is necessary to have sensitive tools employed in long-term follow-up for several years for participants with no or minimal joint disease. The tool kit must be comprehensive, with outcomes of bleeding, factor level restoration or hemostatic capacity, joint structure, joint function, pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. This article reviews the history of prophylaxis, the promise of emerging therapies, and the sensitive tools used to assess long-term efficacy for joint structure and function.

Non-factor therapies for bleeding disorders: A primer for the general haematologist

Management of patients with severe bleeding disorders, particularly haemophilia A and B, and to a lesser extent, von Willebrand disease, has come on leaps and bounds over the past decade. Until recently, patients relied upon the administration of factor concentrates to prevent or treat bleeding episodes. Factor administration requires intravenous access and, in up to one-third of patients, leads to the development of neutralising antibodies, or inhibitors, which are associated with more frequent bleeding episodes and higher morbidity. Novel non-factor therapies may offer a solution to these unmet needs. In this review, we discuss the factor mimetics, particularly emicizumab, and the rebalancing agents, which inhibit antithrombin, tissue factor pathway inhibitor and activated protein C, and novel treatments to enhance von Willebrand factor levels. We review the available trial data, unanswered questions and challenges associated with these new treatment modalities. Finally, we provide practical management algorithms to aid the general haematologist when faced with a patient receiving emicizumab who requires surgery or may develop bleeding.

Managing surgery in hemophilia with recombinant factor VIII Fc and factor IX Fc: Data on safety and effectiveness from phase 3 pivotal studies

Background

Surgical procedures impose hemostatic risk to people with hemophilia, which may be minimized by optimal factor (F) replacement therapy.

Methods

This analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of extended half-life factor replacement recombinant FVIII and FIX Fc fusion proteins (rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc) during surgery in phase 3 pivotal (A-LONG/Kids A-LONG and B-LONG/Kids B-LONG) and extension (ASPIRE and B-YOND) studies. Dosing regimens were determined by investigators. Injection frequency, dosing, blood loss, transfusions, and hemostatic response were assessed.

Results

Forty-five major (n = 31 subjects) and 90 minor (n = 70 subjects) procedures were performed in hemophilia A; 35 major (n = 22) and 62 minor (n = 37) procedures were performed in hemophilia B. Unilateral knee arthroplasty was the most common major orthopedic procedure (hemophilia A: n = 15/34; hemophilia B: n = 8/24). On the day of surgery, median total dose in adults/adolescents was 81 IU/kg for rFVIIIFc and 144 IU/kg for rFIXFc; most major procedures required ≤2 injections (including loading dose). Through days 1-14, most major procedures had ≤1 injection/day. Hemostasis was rated excellent (rFVIIIFc: n = 39/42; rFIXFc: n = 29/33) or good (n = 3/42; n = 4/33) in evaluable major surgeries, with blood loss comparable with subjects without hemophilia. Most minor procedures in adults/adolescents required one injection on the day of surgery, including median loading dose of 51 IU/kg (rFVIIIFc) and 80 IU/kg (rFIXFc). No major treatment-related safety concerns were identified. No subjects developed inhibitors or serious vascular thromboembolic events.

Conclusions

rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc were efficacious and well tolerated for the management of perioperative hemostasis across a wide spectrum of major and minor surgeries in hemophilia.

Surgical outcomes in patients with haemophilia A or B receiving extended half-life recombinant factor VIII and IX Fc fusion proteins: Real-world experience in the Nordic countries

Introduction

Perioperative dosing recommendations vary across Nordic haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) for extended half‐life (EHL) factor concentrates in haemophilia A/B (HA/HB) patients.

Aim

To summarise Nordic real‐world surgical experiences with EHL recombinant factor VIII/IX Fc (rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc) fusion proteins using retrospective data from clinical records at four HTCs in Finland, Sweden and Norway.

Methods

Factor dosing and surgical outcomes were recorded from HA/HB patients who underwent surgery and were treated with rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc. Perioperative factor dosing regimens were clinician‐determined based on local practises.

Results

Twenty five surgeries were performed on 20 patients, all covered by bolus injections except one minor HA surgery; eight minor surgeries were in paediatric patients. Median preoperative rFVIIIFc dose for major HA surgeries (n = 8) was 48 IU/kg (range: 35–57), with total consumption up to Day 14 of 427 IU/kg (196–568). For the two major HB surgeries (in one patient), preoperative rFIXFc doses were 50 IU/kg and 20 IU/kg; total consumption up to Day 14 was 130 IU/kg and 40 IU/kg. Median preoperative rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc bolus doses for minor HA (n = 10) and HB (n = 4) surgeries were 50 IU/kg (24–79) and 47 IU/kg (40–71), with total consumption up to Day 5 of 138 IU/kg (49–404) and 100 IU/kg (43–125), respectively. Intraoperative and postoperative haemostatic responses were rated as at least good/excellent for 24/25 surgeries, with bleeding episodes reported in only three surgeries.

Conclusion

Nordic real‐world experiences suggest that EHL products can be used safely and effectively for peri‐operative haemostasis. Further research is required to develop local dosing guidelines for optimised treatment schedules.

Predicting Individual Changes in Terminal Half-Life After Switching to Extended Half-Life Concentrates in Patients With Severe Hemophilia

Predicting individual effects of switching from standard half-life (SHL) to extended half-life (EHL) FVIII/FIX concentrates is pivotal in clinical care, but large-scale individual data are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess individual changes in terminal half-life (THL) after switching to EHL concentrates and identifying determinants of a clinically relevant THL extension in people with severe hemophilia. Data from participants with pharmacokinetic studies on both SHL and EHL were extracted from the Web-Accessible Population Pharmacokinetics Service (WAPPS) database and stratified according to hemophilia type and age groups (children/adults). A 30% increase in THL was considered clinically relevant. Predictors of a relevant increase were identified using logistic regression. Data from 688 persons with severe hemophilia (2174 infusions) were included: 89% hemophilia A; median age: 21.7 (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.5–37.7); positive inhibitor history: 11.7%. THL increased by 38% (IQR: 17%–67%) and 212% (139%–367%) for hemophilia A and B, respectively. All EHL-FIX concentrate users showed clinically relevant THL extension. However, 40% (242/612) of people with hemophilia A showed limited extension or decrease in THL after switching. Relevant FVIII-THL extension was predicted by short baseline THL and blood group non-O in both children and adults. In conclusion, clinically relevant THL extension was observed in all 75/76 participants switching to EHL-FIX, and in 60% of 612 switching to EHL-FVIII. Short THL on SHL-FVIII and blood group non-O were identified as predictors for a relevant THL increase after switching to EHL-FVIII. Individualized pharmacokinetic assessment may guide clinical decision-making when switching from SHL to EHL-FVIII.

A survey of physicians' treatment switching practice in people on long-term prophylaxis for hemophilia in five European countries

OBJECTIVE

Recombinant factor VIII and factor IX Fc fusion proteins (rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc) were developed with an extended half-life (EHL) to improve the management of people with hemophilia A (PwHA) and B (PwHB), respectively.

METHODS

This survey gathered physician-reported treatment decisions and physician views on outcomes in PwHA or PwHB who switched to rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc in the 12 months prior to study completion.

RESULTS

Physicians (N = 37) considered bleeds, pharmacokinetic parameters, joint health and adherence the most important factors to assess both in routine care and when deciding to switch to an EHL therapy. In the 12 months prior to study completion, 37 physicians switched 113 PwHA to rFVIIIFc and 25 physicians switched 36 PwHB to rFIXFc. Most PwH (>90%) had moderate or severe hemophilia and many (>60%) switched within 6 months of the survey. The main reason for switching PwHA to rFVIIIFc was to allow fewer injections (49%), while the main reason for switching PwHB to rFIXFc was the product becoming available for use (36%). Overall, 96% of PwHA and 89% of PwHB who were switched remained on these EHL products at the time of survey. Mean total weekly dose, injection frequency and annualized bleeding rate were reported to have reduced following switching.

CONCLUSION

This survey provides valuable insight into reasons for, and challenges to, the use of EHL products in clinical practice. Physicians perceived that switching to treatment with rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc can improve quality of life, treatment burden, disease control and adherence.

rFIXFc prophylaxis improves pain and levels of physical activity in haemophilia B: Post hoc analysis of B-LONG using haemophilia-specific quality of life questionnaires

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent bleeding in severe haemophilia B causes painful hemarthroses and reduces capacity for physical activity. Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) prophylaxis results in low annualised bleeding rates, with the potential to improve patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

AIM

To present a post hoc analysis of data from B-LONG describing change over time in patient-reported outcomes associated with pain and physical activity.

METHODS

Patients (≥12 years) who received weekly dose-adjusted or interval-adjusted rFIXFc prophylaxis and completed the Haemophilia-Specific QoL questionnaire for adolescents (Haemo-QoL) or adults (Haem-A-QoL) at baseline (BL) and end of study (EoS). Individual level changes in items of the 'Physical Health' and 'Sports and Leisure' domains, categorised as 'never/rarely/seldom' or 'sometimes/often/all the time', were analysed using McNemar's test to compare distribution of responses at EoS versus BL.

RESULTS

At EoS versus BL, a significantly greater proportion of patients did not experience painful swellings (64% vs. 44%; P = .004), painful joints (44% vs. 28%; P = .003) or pain when moving (54% vs. 41%; P = .026). Additionally, at EoS versus BL, patients were less likely to avoid participating in sports like football (30% vs. 8%; P = .002), avoid sports due to their haemophilia (47% vs. 27%; P = .007), or experience difficulty walking as far as they wanted (63% vs. 43%; P = .001). The proportion of patients who played sports as much as the general population was numerically increased (52% vs. 37%; P = .033) at EoS versus BL.

CONCLUSION

Results of the analysis suggest that over time, rFIXFc prophylaxis is associated with significant improvements in pain and physical functioning. This contributes to previous evidence of overall HRQoL improvements in patients with haemophilia B treated with rFIXFc.

Advances in the management of haemophilia: emerging treatments and their mechanisms

Mainstay haemophilia treatment, namely intravenous factor replacement, poses several clinical challenges including frequent injections due to the short half-life of recombinant factors, intravenous administration (which is particularly challenging in those with difficult venous access), and the risk of inhibitor development. These impact negatively upon quality of life and treatment compliance, highlighting the need for improved therapies. Several novel pharmacological therapies developed for haemophilia aim to rebalance the clotting cascade and potentially circumvent the aforementioned challenges. These therapies utilise a range of different mechanisms, namely: the extension of the circulating half-life of standard recombinant factors; the mimicking of factor VIII cofactor activity; rebalancing of coagulation through targeting of natural anticoagulants such as antithrombin and tissue factor pathway inhibitor; and inducing the production of endogenous factors with gene therapy. These therapies carry the potential of revolutionising haemophilia treatment by alleviating the current challenges presented by mainstay factor replacement. This review will provide an overview of the key trial findings related to novel therapies based on the mechanisms described above.

Clotting factor concentrates for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in previously treated individuals with haemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

The hallmark of severe hemophilia (A or B) is recurrent bleeding into joints and soft tissues with progressive joint damage, despite on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis has long been used, but not universally adopted, because of medical, psychosocial, and cost controversies.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of clotting factor concentrate prophylaxis in managing previously-treated individuals with hemophilia A or B.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. In addition, we searched MEDLINE and Embase and online trial registries. Most recent search of Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register: 24 February 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating people with hemophilia A or hemophilia B, who were previously treated with clotting factor concentrates to manage their hemophilia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed trials for eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The authors used the GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials (including 608 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Eight of the trials (477 participants) had arms comparing two or more prophylactic regimens to one another and four of the trials (n = 258) compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment (two trials had multiple arms and were included in both comparisons). Comparison of two or more prophylactic regimens For trials comparing one prophylaxis regimen to another, given the heterogeneity of the data, none of the data were pooled for this comparison. Considering the individual trials, three trials reported the primary outcome of joint bleeding, and none showed a dfference between dosing regimens (low-certainty evidence). For the secondary outcome of total bleeding events, prophylaxis with a twice-weekly regimen of FIX likely results in reduced total bleeds compared to a once-a-week regimen of the same dose, mean difference (MD) 11.2 (5.81 to 16.59) (one trial, 10 participants, low-certainty evidence). Transient low-titer anti-FVIII inhibitors were reported in one of the trials. Blood-transmitted infections were not identified. Other adverse events reported include hypersensitivity, oedema, and weight gain. These were, however, rare and unrelated to study drugs (very low-certainty evidence). Comparison of prophylactic and on-demand regimens Four of the trials (258 participants) had arms that compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis may result in a large decrease in the number of joint bleeds compared to on-demand treatment, MD -30.34 (95% CI -46.95 to -13.73) (two trials, 164 participants, low-certainty evidence). One of these trials (84 participants) also reported the long-term effects of prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy showing improved joint function, quality of life, and pain; but no differences between groups in joint structure when assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In one trial (84 participants) validated measures for joint health and pain assessment showed that prophylaxis likely improves joint health compared to an on-demand regimen with an estimated change difference of 0.94 points (95% CI 0.23 to 1.65) and improves total pain scores, MD -17.20 (95% CI -27.48 to -6.92 (moderate-certainty evidence). Two trials (131 participants) reported that prophylaxis likely results in a slight increase in adverse events, risk ratio 1.71 (1.24 to 2.37) (moderate-certainty evidence). No inhibitor development and blood-transmitted infections were identified. Overall, the certainty of the body of evidence was judged to be low because of different types of bias that could have altered the effect.   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence from RCTs that prophylaxis, as compared to on-demand treatment, may reduce bleeding frequency in previously-treated people with hemophilia. Prophylaxis may also improve joint function, pain and quality of life, even though this does not translate into a detectable improvement of articular damage when assessed by MRI.  When comparing two different prophylaxis regimens, no significant differences in terms of protection from bleeding were found. Dose optimization could, however, result in improved efficacy. Given the heterogeneity of the data, pooled estimates were not obtained for most comparisons.  Well-designed RCTs and prospective observational controlled studies with standardised definitions and measurements are needed to establish the optimal and most cost-effective treatment regimens.

Final results of the PUPs B-LONG study: evaluating safety and efficacy of rFIXFc in previously untreated patients with hemophilia B

PUPs B-LONG evaluated the safety and efficacy of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with hemophilia B. In this open-label, phase 3 study, male PUPs (age <18 years) with hemophilia B (≤2 IU/dL of endogenous factor IX [FIX]) were to receive treatment with rFIXFc. Primary end point was occurrence of inhibitor development, with a secondary end point of annualized bleed rate (ABR). Of 33 patients who received ≥1 dose of rFIXFc, 26 (79%) were age <1 year at study entry and 6 (18%) had a family history of inhibitors. Twenty-eight patients (85%) received prophylaxis; median dosing interval was 7 days, with an average weekly dose of 58 IU/kg. Twenty-seven patients (82%) completed the study. Twenty-one (64%), 26 (79%), and 28 patients (85%) had ≥50, ≥20, and ≥10 exposure days (EDs) to rFIXFc, respectively. One patient (3.03%; 95% confidence interval, 0.08% to 15.76%) developed a low-titer inhibitor after 11 EDs; no high-titer inhibitors were detected. Twenty-three patients (70%) had 58 treatment-emergent serious adverse events; 2 were assessed as related (FIX inhibition and hypersensitivity in 1 patient, resulting in withdrawal). Median ABR was 1.24 (interquartile range, 0.00-2.49) for patients receiving prophylaxis. Most (>85%) bleeding episodes required only 1 infusion for bleed resolution. In this first study reporting results with rFIXFc in pediatric PUPs with hemophilia B, rFIXFc was well tolerated, with the adverse event profile as expected in a pediatric hemophilia population. rFIXFc was effective, both as prophylaxis and in the treatment of bleeding episodes. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02234310.

Efficacy of rFIXFc versus rIX-FP for the Treatment of Patients with Hemophilia B: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of B-LONG and PROLONG-9FP Trials

Purpose

In patients with hemophilia B, treatment with extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor IX allows for longer dosing intervals while providing equal or superior bleeding protection compared with standard half-life products. This enables flexible, individualized treatment schedules, which reduce the burden of prophylaxis and improve patient outcomes. This analysis compared the efficacy of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) and recombinant factor IX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP), two EHL therapies approved for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in hemophilia B.

Patients and Methods

Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) was used to adjust the between-treatment differences in baseline characteristics. Individual patient data for rFIXFc (B-LONG) were matched to aggregated data for rIX-FP (PROLONG-9FP) followed by statistical comparison for estimated annualized bleeding rate (ABR) using a Poisson regression model with adjustment for over dispersion. Data were analyzed according to treatment regimen prior to study entry: prior prophylaxis (rFIXFc, n=48; rIX-FP, n=40) or prior episodic treatment (n=43 and n=19, respectively). Relative treatment effects are presented as incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

After adjustment for baseline characteristics, estimated ABR observed for rFIXFc and rIX-FP was not significantly different in patients on prior prophylaxis (1.87 versus 1.58; IRR 1.18, 95% CI 0.67–2.10) or prior episodic (2.25 versus 2.22; IRR 1.01 95% CI 0.40–2.57) regimens.

Conclusion

This MAIC analysis shows that the estimated ABR for rFIXFc-treated patients from B-LONG was similar to that of rIX-FP-treated patients from PROLONG-9FP and, therefore, indicates that the two EHL therapies provide similar efficacy when used as prophylaxis for patients with hemophilia B. Trough levels differ between the two products (1–3% [targeted] versus 20% [observed], respectively), suggesting that trough level is not a surrogate indicator when ABR is used as a criterion for clinical efficacy when comparing these FIX products in hemophilia B.

Expert opinion paper on the treatment of hemophilia B with albutrepenonacog alfa

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend prophylactic treatment of hemophilia B with the missing coagulation factor IX, either with standard half-life or extended half-life products. Extended half-life products have half-lives three to six times longer than the former, allowing a reduction in the number of weekly injections and therefore, potentially impacting on treatment adherence and quality of life. Albutrepenonacog alfa is an extended half-life fusion protein of coagulation factor IX with recombinant human albumin, indicated for both on-demand and prophylactic treatment for bleeding in patients with hemophilia B of all ages.Areas covered: The authors review the clinical and pharmacokinetic characteristics of albutrepenonacog alfa, as well as the available information regarding trough levels and real-world evidence. Given the availability of other factor IX products in the market, indirect comparisons of clinical and pharmacokinetic characteristics are presented.Expert opinion: The authors exhibit their expert opinion on which patient profiles are candidates for prophylactic treatment with albutrepenonacog alfa, and on the management of patients in terms of dosing, regimens of administration and protocols for switching the treatment.

Real-world outcomes with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) prophylaxis: Longitudinal follow-up in a national adult cohort

INTRODUCTION

In 2017, all people with severe haemophilia B (PWSHB) in Ireland switched from standard half-life (SHL) recombinant FIX (rFIX) to rFIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) prophylaxis.

AIMS

To evaluate prophylaxis regimens, bleeding rates and factor usage for two years of rFIXFc prophylaxis in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Data collected retrospectively from electronic diaries and medical records of PWSHB for a two-year period on rFIXFc prophylaxis were compared with paired baseline data on SHL rFIX treatment.

RESULTS

28 PWSHB (≥18 years) were enrolled, and at switchover 79% were receiving prophylaxis and 21% episodic treatment with SHL rFIX. At 24 months following switchover, all remained on rFIXFc prophylaxis with reduced infusion frequency; median dose per infusion once weekly (55 IU/kg, 20/28), every 10 days (63 IU/kg, 2/28) or every 14 days (98 IU/kg, 6/28). Median annualised bleed rate improved significantly on rFIXFc prophylaxis (2.0 versus 3.3 on SHL FIX) (p = 0.01). Median FIX trough level with once-weekly infusions was 0.09 IU/ml (0.06-0.14 IU/ml). Management of bleeding episodes was similar with rFIXFc and SHL rFIX; one infusion was sufficient to treat 74% and 77% of bleeds, respectively, with similar total median treatment per bleeding episode. Factor consumption reduced by 28% with rFIXFc prophylaxis (57 IU/kg/week, range 40-86 IU/kg/week) compared with SHL rFIX (79 IU/kg/week, range 44-210 IU/kg/week) (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This study provides important insights into real-world experience of switching to rFIXFc prophylaxis in an adult population, demonstrating high rates of prophylaxis, with reduced infusion frequency, bleeding and FIX consumption.

Safety and efficacy of nonacog alfa for the treatment of haemophilia B in children younger than 6 years of age in a routine clinical care setting: the EUREKIX registry study

INTRODUCTION

European regulatory authorities request postmarketing safety and efficacy data for factor IX (FIX) products.

AIM

Collect additional clinical data from routine nonacog alfa use in children aged <6 years with haemophilia B.

METHODS

The EUREKIX registry included retrospective and prospective data collection phases. Safety was assessed via adverse drug reactions (ADRs)/adverse events (AEs) and events of special interest (ESIs) as the primary objective; efficacy was evaluated via annualised bleeding rates (ABRs).

RESULTS

The retrospective phase comprised 37 subjects. Of these, 25 had severe haemophilia B. One subject experienced 2 ADRs; another experienced 4 ESIs of hypersensitivity. Median ABR in subjects receiving a predominantly on-demand regimen (prophylaxis <50% of time; n = 11) was 2.0; median ABR was 3.8 in those receiving predominantly prophylactic treatment (prophylaxis ≥50% of time; n = 24). Joint bleeding was infrequent (median ABR, 0.4; n = 35). The prospective phase included 26 subjects, with 17 continuing from the retrospective phase. A total of 20 subjects had severe haemophilia B. Three subjects experienced 7 treatment-related AEs; 3 experienced 4 ESIs. Median ABR was 4.5 and 1.1 in subjects who received predominantly on-demand (n = 5) or prophylactic treatment (n = 19), respectively; the overall median ABR for joint bleeding events was 0.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, nonacog alfa treatment effectively controlled bleeding events, with no new safety signals identified. These data support the safety and efficacy of nonacog alfa in routine clinical settings in children aged <6 years.

Pharmacodynamics of eftrenonacog-alfa (rFIX-Fc) in severe hemophilia B patients: A real-life study

Eftrenonacog-alfa is a recombinant factor IX-Fc fusion protein increasingly prescribed in hemophilia B patients. We aimed to assess its pharmacodynamics (PD) in real-life setting via FIX activity measurement and thrombin generation assay (TGA). Sixty samples from 15 severe hemophilia B treated patients were collected at different time points. FIX activity was measured using product-specific one-stage clotting assay (reference method) and two chromogenic assays (CSA) (Biophen FIX and Rox FIX). TGA was triggered with 1 pM tissue factor. Five parameters were analyzed: lag time (LT), time to peak (TTP), peak height (PH), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), and velocity. PD models were built to characterize their relationships with FIX activity, using mixed effects models. Mean trough FIX level was estimated at 4.64 (±1.50) IU/dl with a recovery at 0.78 (±0.16) IU/dl per 1 IU/kg injected dose. FIX activity ranged between 1 and 86 IU/dl with 21.5 IU/dl median value. Biophen FIX and Rox FIX allowed reliable measurements except in samples with FIX <20 IU/dl in which values were underestimated (delta >30%). PD models revealed that velocity was the most sensitive TGA parameter to FIX activity followed by PH, ETP, TTP and finally LT. Following FIX activity peak after eftrenonacog-alfa injection, velocity decreased first, followed by PH then ETP. Both CSA failed to accurately measure FIX in severe hemophilia B patients receiving eftrenonacog-alfa throughout the measuring range. TGA could be an additional valuable tool to evaluate hemostasis balance in treated patients.

Real-world data demonstrate improved bleed control and extended dosing intervals for patients with haemophilia B after switching to recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) for up to 5 years

Introduction

In clinical trials, recombinant factor IX fusion protein (rFIXFc) has demonstrated safety, efficacy and prolonged activity with extended dosing intervals for treatment of haemophilia B.

Aim

To assess the real‐world clinical utility of rFIXFc in a variable patient population and routine clinical practice.

Methods

A multicentre, retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with haemophilia B who had received rFIXFc prophylaxis or on‐demand treatment for ≥6 months across six sites in the United States.

Results

Sixty‐four eligible patients were identified who had a median (range) duration on rFIXFc of 2.7 (0.5‐5.0) years. Of 32 patients on rFIXFc prophylaxis who switched from prophylaxis with another factor treatment (ie pre‐rFIXFc) and had a known pre‐rFIXFc dosing interval, the initial dosing interval was lengthened for 26 (81%) patients and maintained for the remaining 6 (19%) patients. Most (n = 48 [91%]) patients who received rFIXFc prophylaxis from the beginning to the end of the chart review period (n = 53) maintained or lengthened the dosing interval from first through last dose of rFIXFc. For patients receiving rFIXFc prophylaxis, there was an approximate 50% reduction in weekly factor consumption compared with pre‐rFIXFc prophylaxis. Overall annualized bleed rates, annualized spontaneous bleed rates and annualized joint bleed rates decreased after switching to rFIXFc prophylaxis (n = 24 with bleed data). Compliance to recommended treatment improved or remained stable in most patients with available data (30/31).

Conclusion

Recombinant factor IX fusion protein prophylaxis improved bleed control, reduced overall consumption, reduced frequency of infusion and improved compliance for patients with haemophilia B in a real‐world setting.

Budget impact analysis of extended half-life recombinant factor IX (rFIXFc) in the treatment of haemophilia B

Introduction

Prophylaxis with factor IX (FIX) concentrates, produced by recombinant DNA technology (rFIX) or human plasma-derived concentrates, is the treatment of choice for haemophilia B (HB); rFIX covalently fused to the Fc domain of human immunoglobulin G1 (rFIXFc) allows for prophylaxis/treatment with one infusion every 7-14 days. The purpose of this study is to quantify the financial impact of prophylaxis with rFIXFc vs. other approved rFIX and reimbursed for treatment of HB in Italy.

Methods

The number of patients was estimated according to Italian epidemiological data and use of rFIX. Dose and frequency of administration used for weekly prophylaxis were those recommended in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC), while clinical trials and literature data were used to calculate bleeding rates and management. Drug costs were calculated using regional ex-factory net prices. In the model, a reference scenario (Reference) vs. an alternative scenario (Alternative) were created to account for introduction of rFIXFc, estimating an increasing trend of the market share of rFIXFc in a 3-year timeframe. The analysis was developed in the perspective of the National Health Service and included healthcare costs related to rFIX for prophylaxis and resolution of bleeding events.

Results

The model estimated an overall cumulative expenditure (years 1-3) of €209,453,646 for the Reference and €207,465,568 for Alternative scenarios, with calculated cumulative savings of €1,988,068.

Conclusions

The increasing use of rFIXFc as a substitute for other rFIX concentrates in the treatment of HB can represent a financially viable choice for the Italian National Health Service while ensuring effective control of bleeding.

The availability of new drugs for hemophilia treatment

INTRODUCTION

A number of new FVIII/IX concentrates enriched the portfolio of products available for the treatment of hemophilia A/B patients. Due to the large inter-patient variability, accurate tailoring of the therapy became essential to improve patients' adherence, clinical outcomes, and cost/effectiveness ratio. Recently, non-replacement therapies have taken the limelight and succeeded in decreasing the bleedings of patients.

AREAS COVERED

The PK characteristics, efficacy, and safety of the new rFVIII and rFIX concentrates and of non-replacement therapy, are reported in detail in the published clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Outstanding improvements of rFIX concentrates' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have allowed to reduce the bleedings in hemophilia B patients, in order to increase their adherence to prophylaxis and quality of life. Less significant are the effects of pegylation or Fc fusion on the pharmacokinetics of the new rFVIII concentrates. The new non-replacement therapy is achieving the favor of many treaters and patients, in particular those with Factor VIII inhibitors. Great attention must be paid to the dangerous synergy of APCC and emicizumab, responsible for some fatal events during the clinical trials and compassionate use of this drug. So far, replacement therapy should be the standard of care for hemophilia patients without inhibitors or difficulties in venous access.

Switching patients in the age of long-acting recombinant products?

Introduction: Prophylaxis with factor replacement therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of hemophilia, but this often requires frequent infusions. A number of long-acting factor products have been developed to reduce the burden on patients. Areas covered: This is an overview of information presented at two symposia held at the World Federation of Hemophilia and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis - Scientific and Standardization Committee annual meetings. The pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy data for long-acting recombinant products are reviewed, with a focus on recombinant factor IX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) and rVIII-SingleChain. This overview also provides a guide for managing a patient's switch to long-acting products. Expert opinion: Long-acting products may allow patients to maintain or decrease bleeding rates whilst increasing their dosing interval, which may in turn reduce the burden on patients and caregivers. When switching patients to long-acting products health-care professionals should provide balanced and thorough education to the patient, whilst supporting their emotional well-being. Regimens should address patients' needs and goals but should also be guided by clinical phenotype and pharmacokinetic assessment. Follow-up should assess safety concerns, bleeding rates, joint health and the impact of the regimen on patients' lifestyle.

Long-term safety and sustained efficacy for up to 5 years of treatment with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein in subjects with haemophilia B: Results from the B-YOND extension study

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) has demonstrated efficacy for treatment of haemophilia B in the Phase 3 B-LONG and Kids B-LONG studies. However, long-term rFIXFc safety and efficacy data have not yet been reported.

AIM

To report long-term rFIXFc safety and efficacy in subjects with haemophilia B.

METHODS

B-YOND (NCT01425723) was an open-label extension for eligibl previously treated subjects who completed B-LONG or Kids B-LONG. Subjects received ≥1 treatment regimen: weekly prophylaxis (WP), individualized interval prophylaxis (IP), modified prophylaxis or episodic treatment. Subjects could switch regimens at any time. The primary endpoint was inhibitor development.

RESULTS

Ninety-three subjects from B-LONG and 27 from Kids B-LONG (aged 3-63 years) were enrolled. Most subjects received WP (B-LONG: n = 51; Kids B-LONG: n = 23). For subjects from B-LONG, median (range) treatment duration was 4.0 (0.3-5.4) years and median (range) number of exposure days (EDs) was 146 (8-462) EDs. Corresponding values for paediatric subjects were 2.6 (0.2-3.9) years and 132 (50-256) EDs. No inhibitors were observed (0 per 1000 subject-years; 95% confidence interval, 0-8.9) and the overall rFIXFc safety profile was consistent with prior studies. Annualized bleed rates remained low and extended-dosing intervals were maintained for most subjects. Median dosing interval for the IP group was approximately 14 days for adults and adolescents (n = 31) and 10 days for paediatric subjects (n = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

B-YOND results confirm the long-term (up to 5 years, with cumulative duration up to 6.5 years) well-characterized safety and efficacy of rFIXFc treatment for haemophilia B.

Real-World Utilisation and Bleed Rates in Patients with Haemophilia B Who Switched to Recombinant Factor IX Fusion Protein (rIX-FP): A Retrospective International Analysis

Introduction

Despite the well-documented benefits of prophylaxis, treatment burden is still a barrier to adherence in patients with haemophilia. An extended half-life fusion protein linking recombinant FIX (rFIX) with human albumin (rIX-FP) has been developed for the treatment of patients with haemophilia B and is indicated for dosing up to every 14 days. This analysis evaluated real-world outcomes in patients switching to rIX-FP from the previous FIX product in Italy, Belgium and the UK.

Methods

Anonymised chart data were collected from the pre-existing medical records of patients with haemophilia B between May and September 2018. Patients were included in the analysis if they had been treated with rIX-FP for ≥ 8 weeks. Data were compared between rIX-FP and the patient’s prior FIX product.

Results

Twenty-three HTCs from Italy (n = 13), Belgium (n = 3) and the UK (n = 7) provided data for 84 male patients, 92.8% of which had severe haemophilia B. The majority of patients were previously on prophylactic regimens with their prior FIX product (Italy, 44/49; Belgium, 7/10; UK, 22/25). The switch to prophylaxis with rIX-FP led to reductions in mean annualised bleeding rate of 94.3% in Italy, 93.9% in Belgium and 67.7% in the UK compared with prior FIX prophylaxis. Overall, 41% of patients experienced zero spontaneous bleeds prior to switching, compared with 88% following the switch to rIX-FP. The majority of patients had a reduction in dosing frequency following the switch, with 98.6% of patients dosing once weekly or less frequently compared with 9.6% of patients dosing at this frequency with their prior FIX. Mean weekly FIX consumption was reduced compared with prior FIX prophylaxis.

Conclusion

This retrospective review of real-world evidence demonstrated that switching to rIX-FP from prior FIX was associated with improved haemostatic efficacy and reduced factor consumption in patients with haemophilia B from Italy, Belgium and the UK.

While clinical trials provide robust evidence as to the effectiveness and safety of a new drug, they are tightly controlled and so may not reflect some of the issues that may be discovered in clinical practice. Therefore, real-world analyses are important to determine how a product performs in patients in everyday settings. This study looked at the use of an extended half-life fusion protein linking recombinant FIX (rFIX) with human albumin (rIX-FP), which was designed to allow longer dosing intervals, in patients with haemophilia B in Italy, Belgium and the UK, and compared this with the patients’ previous FIX product. Anonymous patient chart data were collected from participating centres and analysed in terms of bleeding rate, factor usage and dosing frequency for rIX-FP and previous FIX product. The results showed that after switching to rIX-FP, patients experienced lower bleeding rates, lower factor usage and less frequent dosing regimens compared with their previous FIX product. This is the first analysis to assess the real-world clinical benefits of switching to prophylaxis with rIX-FP from a prior FIX product in Italy, Belgium and the UK. This study further strengthens the results seen in clinical trials with rIX-FP, confirming that the effective bleeding prevention demonstrated in clinical trials is consistent with that seen in patients in real-world clinical practice.

Measurements of eftrenonacog alfa by 19 different combinations reagents/instrument: A single-centre study

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) is an extended half-life concentrate for the treatment of haemophilia B (HB). rFIXFc activity monitoring is crucial in several clinical situations. However, differences were observed between one-stage clotting (OSC) and chromogenic assays, but not for all factor IX (FIX) concentrations.

AIMS

To compare rFIXFc measurements obtained using different instruments and common OSC and chromogenic asssays.

METHODS

FIX:C measurements were performed in rFIXFc-spiked plasma aliquots (targeted FIX levels of 1.5, 1, 0.5, 0.2, 0.05, 0.02 and 0.01 IU/mL) and plasma samples collected from two patients with HB at various time points after rFIXFc infusion, using three instruments (STA-R MAX, ACLTOP700 and CS2100i) and common clotting and chromogenic FIX:C assays.

RESULTS

The same reagent could give different FIX:C measurements when adapted to different instruments. Moreover, the same reagent/instrument combination could give different results depending of the FIX concentration. For OSC assays, only STA-Cephascreen on STA-R MAX and CS2100i, SynthAFax on ACLTOP 700 and Actin on CS2100i provided acceptable recoveries for all rFIXFc concentrations. The chromogenic assays ROX-FIX and Biophen FIX:C underestimated rFIXFc for concentrations lower than 0.05 and 0.2 IU/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the same reagent adapted to different instruments could lead to different rFIXFc values. As rFIXFc under/overestimation could be associated with inappropriate treatment or biased calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters, the reagent/instrument combination used by haemostasis laboratories should be considered and regularly evaluated by external quality assessment programmes.

Extended half-life recombinant products in haemophilia clinical practice - Expectations, opportunities and challenges

Extended half-life (EHL) products have shown robust efficacy in clinical trials, whilst allowing for less intense treatment regimens when compared with standard half-life products. Regimen optimisation with EHL products could lead to further improvements in bleeding rates, quality of life and reductions in treatment burden. Patients now expect good efficacy, a lower treatment burden and equivalent safety when compared with standard half-life products. As our knowledge base grows these expectations have evolved and targeting an annualised bleeding rate of zero has become a more realistic clinical goal. Personalised prophylaxis can help patients achieve these goals. However, a number of challenges still remain, including cost, challenges in predicting outcomes for patients and differences in patients' and clinicians' expectations. When switching a patient, comprehensive patient care can reduce the impact of these issues. This review presents in brief the protein therapeutics with an extended half-life, including key trial results, challenges of chronic care that impact on patients' outcomes and how the modified proteins might help address some of these issues. In addition, practical steps for managing the switch to EHL products are presented.

Favorable pharmacokinetics in hemophilia B for nonacog beta pegol versus recombinant factor IX-Fc fusion protein: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) and recombinant factor IX-Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) are extended half-life rFIX compounds. We report the first single-dose pharmacokinetic trial of N9-GP and rFIXFc.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Paradigm 7 was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, crossover trial in previously treated (>150 exposure days) adults with congenital hemophilia B (FIX activity ≤2%). Patients received single intravenous injections (50 IU/kg) of N9-GP and rFIXFc with at least 21 days between doses. Plasma FIX activity, predose, and at serial time points up to 240 hours postdose, was measured using validated one-stage clotting assays (SynthAFax for N9-GP; Actin FSL for rFIXFc) and a chromogenic assay (ROX factor IX) with normal human plasma as calibrator. The primary endpoint was area under the FIX activity-time curve from 0 to infinity, dose-normalized to 50 IU/kg (AUC0-inf,norm).

RESULTS

Fifteen patients received study treatment. Based on FIX activity results from the one-stage clotting assays, estimated AUC0-inf,norm was significantly greater for N9-GP than rFIXFc (ratio: 4.39; P < 0.0001, based on a two-sided test on 5% significance level). In addition, N9-GP had a longer terminal half-life, two times higher incremental recovery at 30 minutes and maximum FIX activity (dose-normalized to 50 IU/kg) and six times higher FIX activity at 168 hours than rFIXFc. These findings were largely comparable with the chromogenic assay data and are consistent with published data for each compound.

CONCLUSIONS

In this comparison, N9-GP demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics versus rFIXFc, helping clinicians to understand differences between N9-GP and rFIXFc.

REGISTRATION

This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03075670) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT: 2016-001149-25).

Hemophilia in a Changing Treatment Landscape

The mainstay of hemophilia management has been the regular, prophylactic infusion of missing coagulation factors VIII/IX. This approach is limited by the need for frequent intravenous infusions, high cost, limited availability, and the development of inhibitory antibodies to factors VIII/IX. Numerous recent breakthroughs are addressing many of these limitations. These include the development of extended half-life factors that require less frequent infusions and the development of various novel agents that can be given subcutaneously and infrequently, including FVIII-mimetic antibody and downregulators of natural anticoagulants. Finally, gene therapy is set to offer patients a possibility for a cure.

Extending recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein dosing interval to 14 or more days in patients with hemophilia B

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 B-LONG study (NCT01027364), prophylaxis with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) every 7 to >14 days was associated with low annualized bleed rates (ABRs) in males aged ≥12 years with severe hemophilia B. The long-term safety and efficacy of rFIXFc prophylaxis was confirmed in the B-YOND study (NCT01425723), an extension of the B-LONG clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of a ≥14-day rFIXFc dosing interval in patients treated prophylactically during B-LONG or B-YOND.

METHODS

The analysis included 22 patients aged ≥12 years who received prophylactic rFIXFc with a ≥14-day dosing interval at any time during B-LONG or B-YOND up until the second interim analysis of B-YOND (September 2015).

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range [IQR]) rFIXFc exposure on the ≥14-day dosing interval was 3.4 (1.8-4) years. Patients treated with a ≥14-day dosing interval were well controlled with a median (IQR) overall ABR of 1.6 (0.6-2.7) and a median (IQR) spontaneous ABR of 0.7 (0.3-1.1) in 18 evaluable patients. A rFIXFc dosing interval of ≥14 days was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns identified.

CONCLUSION

Most patients on rFIXFc prophylaxis, with a dosing interval of ≥14 days, remained well controlled; ABRs were consistent with those reported in the overall study population. A ≥14-day dosing interval can be utilized in some well controlled individuals and reduces the burden imposed by frequent prophylactic injections while maintaining adequate bleed suppression.

Updates in clinical trial data of extended half-life recombinant factor IX products for the treatment of haemophilia B

Whilst the global prevalence of haemophilia B is less than that of haemophilia A, rapid and remarkable innovations have been made in the development of haemophilia B therapies in the last decade. The most recent developments are the evolution of extended half-life haemophilia B replacement therapies which are designed to reduce the treatment burden associated with prophylactic infusion of factor IX (FIX) to prevent bleeding in haemophilia B participants. Clinical development programmes have culminated in the completion of three phase III studies on extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FIX (rFIX) products and subsequent approval and registration of these in many countries around the world. Current data from the three EHL rFIX clinical studies indicate that these products have acceptable safety profiles with no allergic reactions, thromboembolic phenomena or neutralizing antibodies when given to previously treated adolescent and adults for the prevention of bleeds, for the treatment of bleeds and in the perisurgical haemostasis use. Studies in previously untreated paediatric participants are currently ongoing. The EHL rFIX products have the potential impact to reduce the treatment burden associated with prophylactic infusion of replacement FIX, to treat and prevent bleeds in participants with haemophilia B and to improve the participant's health-related quality of life. The impact of EHL rFIX is likely to be modified by current development of other haemophilia B therapy such as antitissue factor pathway inhibitors and haemophilia B gene therapy. In this review, we aim to provide an update on the safety and efficacy data from the three EHL rFIX clinical studies and to consider their roles in the face of novel haemophilia B therapy currently evolving.

The benefits of prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

The health benefits of prophylactic dosing regimens for clotting factor therapy in patients with hemophilia include reduced joint damage and improved quality of life; as such, prophylaxis is recommended in treatment guidelines. However, many patients with hemophilia B are treated on demand, and prophylaxis has been utilized less frequently than in hemophilia A. Areas covered: This review discusses the opportunities and evidence for prophylaxis in hemophilia B, in the context of treatment guidelines and with regard to factor IX (FIX) replacement therapies, including long-acting recombinant FIX (rFIX). Expert commentary: Long-acting rFIX concentrates may increase uptake of and adherence to prophylaxis regimens through attainment of higher trough levels with longer dosing intervals. In this new era of hemophilia B treatment, physicians may be able to achieve better clinical outcomes for their patients and reconsider treatment goals. Maintaining higher FIX trough levels will undoubtedly have long-term benefits for patients, such as preserving joint function. The long-acting rFIX concentrates support robust prophylaxis regimens and offer physician's flexibility in treating patients to best suit their needs, whether to enable an active lifestyle, to achieve higher trough levels for better bleed protection, or simply to decrease the burden of treatment by reducing injection frequency.

Prophylactic versus on-demand treatments for hemophilia: advantages and drawbacks

INTRODUCTION

Early long-term prophylaxis is the standard of care to prevent joint bleeding and chronic arthropathy in patients with severe hemophilia. Areas covered: Despite the obvious prophylaxis advantages upon the clinical outcomes, there are still several drawbacks to be addressed for the optimal patients' compliance. Frequency of treatment due to short half-life of conventional FVIII and FIX concentrates, difficult venous access, adherence to the prescribed therapy and costs may represent significant critical issues. The development of inhibitors also makes replacement therapy ineffective, preventing patients from receiving long-term prophylaxis. This paper will review these drawbacks and the tools to overcome these limitations, mainly thanks to the use of extended half-life products and the development of novel non-conventional therapeutic approaches. Expert commentary: The use of extended half-life products may help in reducing the burden of the frequent intravenous administration and in better tailoring an individualized prophylaxis. The development of novel therapeutic approaches, like the bi-specific antibody mimicking the coagulation function of FVIII or inhibition of anticoagulant proteins may facilitate prophylaxis treatment not only in patients with inhibitors, but also in severe hemophilia patients without inhibitors. Exciting opportunities are emerging for improving prophylaxis in hemophilia.

Advancement in the treatment of haemophilia

Poor understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in Haemophilia is a major obstacle in accessing effective haemophilia disease management. Haemophilia is a life-frightening bleeding problem in which there are repeated bleeding episodes. Various approaches have been used, involves clotting factor replacement therapy for effective bleeding control in Haemophilia. Current advancements in the management of patients with haemophilia include altered pharmacokinetics clotting factor concentrates for better prophylaxis and management of haemophilia. This review sums up the prophylactic treatment, novel production techniques, other treatment techniques and the present position of gene therapy in the treatment of haemophilia.