Haemodynamic support for paediatric septic shock: a global perspective

Corticosteroids in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Narrative Review

Objective: A controversial aspect of pediatric septic shock management is corticosteroid therapy. Current guidelines do not recommend its use in forms responsive to fluids and inotropes but leave the decision to physicians in forms refractory to the first steps of therapy. Data Sources: Review of literature from January 2013 to December 2023 from online libraries Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Study Selection: The keywords "septic shock", "steroids" and "children" were used. Data Extraction: Of 399 articles, 63 were selected. Data Synthesis: Regarding mortality, although the 2019 Cochrane review supports reduced mortality, benefits on long-term mortality and in patients with CIRCI (critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency) are not clear. Yang's metanalysis and retrospective studies of Nichols and Atkinson show no difference or even an increase in mortality. Regarding severity, the Cochrane review claims that hydrocortisone seems to reduce the length of intensive care hospitalization but influences the duration of ventilatory and inotropic support, and the degree of multi-organ failure appears limited. Further controversies exist on adrenal function evaluation: according to literature, including the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, basal or stimulated hormonal dosages do not allow the identification of patients who could benefit from hydrocortisone therapy (poor reproducibility). Regarding side effects, muscle weakness, hypernatremia, and hyperglycemia are the most observed. Conclusions: The literature does not give certainties about the efficacy of corticosteroids in pediatric septic shock, as their influence on primary outcomes (mortality and severity) is controversial. A subgroup of patients suffering from secondary adrenal insufficiency could benefit from it, but it remains to be defined how to identify and what protocol to use to treat them.

OUTCOMES OF PEDIATRIC FLUID-REFRACTORY SEPTIC SHOCK ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT VASOACTIVE STRATEGIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT

Background: Hemodynamic support using vasoactive agents is a mainstay in the management of patients with pediatric fluid-refractory septic shock (FRSS). However, evidence supporting the appropriate choice of vasoactive agent is limited. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of different first-line vasoactive strategies on mortality in pediatric FRSS. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov , and the ISRCTN registry were searched up until December 2023. Randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies reporting vasoactive agent-specific outcomes of children with FRSS were included. Mortality was assessed as primary outcome in studies on patients receiving dopamine, epinephrine, or norepinephrine as first-line. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Prevalence ratio (PR) estimates were calculated between two drugs when was available in the same study. Findings: Of the 26,284 identified articles, 13 were included, for a total of 997 children. Twelve studies included 748 patients receiving a single vasoactive agent. Of these, 361 received dopamine, 271 epinephrine, and 116 norepinephrine. Overall pooled mortality for patients receiving a single vasoactive was 12% (95% CI 6%-21%) of which 11% (95% CI 3%-36%) for patients receiving dopamine, 17% (95% CI 6%-37%) for epinephrine, and 7% (95% CI 1%-48%) for norepinephrine. Four first-line dopamine (176 patients) and first-line epinephrine (142 patients): dopamine showed a tendency toward higher mortality (PR 1.38, 95% CI 0.81-2.38) and a significant higher need for mechanical ventilation (PR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.22). Interpretation: Among children with FRSS receiving a single vasoactive agent, norepinephrine was associated with the lowest mortality rate. Comparing dopamine and epinephrine, patients receiving epinephrine needed less mechanical ventilation and showed a trend for lower mortality rate. Further research is needed to better delineate the first-line vasoactive agent in this population.

Data-driven analysis that integrates bioinformatics and machine learning uncovers PANoptosis-related diagnostic genes in early pediatric septic shock

Objectives

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death for children worldwide. Additionally, refractory septic shock is one of the most significant groups that contributes to a high death rate. The interaction of pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis results in a unique inflammatory cell death mechanism known as PANoptosis. An increasing amount of evidence suggests that PANoptosis can be brought on by several stimuli, including cytokine storms, malignancy, and bacterial or viral infections. The goal of this study is to improve the diagnostic significance of the PANoptosis-related gene signature in early pediatric septic shock.

Design and methods

We examined children with septic shock from the GSE66099 discovery cohort and looked at differentially expressed genes (DEGs). To filter the important modules, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WCGNA) was employed. In the end, random forest analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to determine the PANoptosis diagnostic signature genes. To determine the PANoptosis signature genes, we also found four validation cohorts: GSE26378, GSE26440, GSE8121, and GSE13904. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs), along with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, were used to assess the diagnostic efficacy of these signature genes.

Results

From GSE66099, 1142 DEGs in total were tested. Following the WGCNA clustering of the data into 16 modules, the MEgrey module showed a significant correlation with pediatric septic shock (p < 0.0001). Following the use of LASSO and random forest algorithms to identify the PANoptosis-related signature genes, which include ANXA3, S100A9, TXN, CLEC5A, and TMEM263. These signature genes' receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were confirmed in the external dataset from GSE26378, GSE26440, GSE8121, and GSE13904, and were 0.994 (95 % CI 0.987-0.999), 0.987 (95 % CI 0.974-0.997), 0.957 (95 % CI 0.927-0.981), 0.974 (95 % CI 0.954-0.988), 0.897 (95 % CI 0.846-0.941), respectively.

Conclusion

In summary, the discovery of PANoptosis genes, ANXA3, S100A9, TXN, CLEC5A, and TMEM263 proved to be quite helpful in the early detection of pediatric septic shock patients. These early results, which need to be further confirmed in basic and clinical research, are extremely important for understanding immune cell infiltration in the pathophysiology of pediatric septic shock.

Susceptibility to childhood sepsis, contemporary management, and future directions

Sepsis disproportionally affects children across all health-care settings and is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in neonatal and paediatric age groups. As shown in the first paper in this Series, the age-specific incidence of sepsis is highest during the first years of life, before approaching adult incidence rates during adolescence. In the second paper in this Series, we focus on the unique susceptibility of paediatric patients to sepsis and how the underlying dysregulated host response relates to developmental aspects of children's immune system, genetic, perinatal, and environmental factors, and comorbidities and socioeconomic determinants of health, which often differ between children and adults. State-of-the-art clinical management of paediatric sepsis is organised around three treatment pillars-diagnosis, early resuscitation, and titration of advanced care-and we examine available treatment guidelines and the limitations of their supporting evidence. Serious evidence gaps remain in key areas of paediatric sepsis care, especially surrounding recognition, common interventions, and survivor support, and to this end we offer a research roadmap for the next decade that could accelerate targeted diagnostics and personalised use of immunomodulation. However, improving outcomes for children with sepsis relies fundamentally on systematic quality improvement in both recognition and treatment, which is the theme of the third paper in this Series. Digital health, as shown in the fourth and final paper of this Series, holds promising potential in breaking down the barriers that hinder progress in paediatric sepsis care and, ultimately, global child health.

Resuscitating the macro- vs. microcirculation in septic shock

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes current literature about the relationships between macro and microcirculation and their practical clinical implications in children with septic shock.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current evidence from experimental and clinical observational studies in children and adults with septic shock reveals that the response to treatment and resuscitation is widely variable. Furthermore, there is a loss of hemodynamic coherence, as resuscitation-induced improvement in macrocirculation (systemic hemodynamic parameters) does not necessarily result in a parallel improvement in the microcirculation. Therefore, patient-tailored monitoring is essential in order to adjust treatment requirements during resuscitation in septic shock. Optimal monitoring must integrate macrocirculation (heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac output, and ultrasound images), microcirculation (videomicroscopy parameters and capillary refill time) and cellular metabolism (lactic acid, central venous blood oxygen saturation, and difference of central venous to arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure).

SUMMARY

There is a dire need for high-quality studies to assess the relationships between macrocirculation, microcirculation and tissue metabolism in children with septic shock. The development of reliable and readily available microcirculation and tissue perfusion biomarkers (other than lactic acid) is also necessary to improve monitoring and treatment adjustment in such patients.

Coexistence of a fluid responsive state and venous congestion signals in critically ill patients: a multicenter observational proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

Current recommendations support guiding fluid resuscitation through the assessment of fluid responsiveness. Recently, the concept of fluid tolerance and the prevention of venous congestion (VC) have emerged as relevant aspects to be considered to avoid potentially deleterious side effects of fluid resuscitation. However, there is paucity of data on the relationship of fluid responsiveness and VC. This study aims to compare the prevalence of venous congestion in fluid responsive and fluid unresponsive critically ill patients after intensive care (ICU) admission.

METHODS

Multicenter, prospective cross-sectional observational study conducted in three medical-surgical ICUs in Chile. Consecutive mechanically ventilated patients that required vasopressors and admitted < 24 h to ICU were included between November 2022 and June 2023. Patients were assessed simultaneously for fluid responsiveness and VC at a single timepoint. Fluid responsiveness status, VC signals such as central venous pressure, estimation of left ventricular filling pressures, lung, and abdominal ultrasound congestion indexes and relevant clinical data were collected.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included. Median age was 63 [45-71] years old, and median SOFA score was 9 [7-11]. Thirty-eight percent of the patients were fluid responsive (FR+), while 62% were fluid unresponsive (FR-). The most prevalent diagnosis was sepsis (41%) followed by respiratory failure (22%). The prevalence of at least one VC signal was not significantly different between FR+ and FR- groups (53% vs. 57%, p = 0.69), as well as the proportion of patients with 2 or 3 VC signals (15% vs. 21%, p = 0.4). We found no association between fluid balance, CRT status, or diagnostic group and the presence of VC signals.

CONCLUSIONS

Venous congestion signals were prevalent in both fluid responsive and unresponsive critically ill patients. The presence of venous congestion was not associated with fluid balance or diagnostic group. Further studies should assess the clinical relevance of these results and their potential impact on resuscitation and monitoring practices.