1
|
Davies E. 'This has given me the peace of mind I needed': ethnographic insights into Barrett's oesophagus screening using the capsule sponge test. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2024:jme-2024-109928. [PMID: 38955478 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2024-109928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
In 2021 and 2022, researchers carried out an implementation trial that considered how the capsule sponge test might be used to screen for Barrett's oesophagus using a mobile clinic in East Anglia. This paper offers insights from 15 months of ethnographic fieldwork studying the trial. It aims to highlight the value of the test in offering reassurance to worried patients, particularly to those with a family history of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. It also considers the variety of aims people held for the capsule sponge test, including the hope that it would address their symptoms of acid reflux, and the conflict that sometimes emerged as a result. The second half of the paper uses fieldwork carried out in virtual support groups for people with Barrett's oesophagus to explore experiences postdiagnosis, which sometimes were defined by fear of future cancers. It describes notable differences between the care offered to people with morphological risk conditions like Barrett's oesophagus and the care given to those with genetic risk conditions, including the provision of genetic counselling. More broadly, the paper highlights a tension between patient-centred and risk-centred medicine that is likely to grow as healthcare services continue to shift towards preventative approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elspeth Davies
- Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ratcliffe E, Britton J, Baines S, Prasad N, Keld R, Murgatroyd M, Montenegro M, Viloria E, McLaughlin J, Hamdy S, Ang Y. Development and validation of a novel Barrett's oesophagus patient reported outcome measure (B-PROM). EClinicalMedicine 2024; 72:102606. [PMID: 38745966 PMCID: PMC11090893 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BO) carry significant cancer worry, burden of symptoms, and lack disease-specific knowledge. Currently there is no validated BO patient reported outcome measure (PROM) to measure these factors for use in clinical practice and research, hence the aim of this study was to devise a novel, validated BO-specific tool, B-PROM. Methods Literature review, quantitative and qualitative research informed the initial item generation. The item bank was refined through a modified Delphi process between May and August 2021. The PROM was then tested through cognitive interviews and validated via multicentre testing between September 2021 and February 2023 with the aim to create a succinct tool which addresses the key important factors to BO patients and has strong psychometric properties. Findings B-PROM covers key themes of disease-specific knowledge, trust in clinicians, burden of symptoms, cancer worry and burden of surveillance. Validation results from 387 participants (response rate 40.8%) showed 93.3% of participants completed >95% of B-PROM. All individual items scored a completion rate of >95%. Mean completion time was 5 mins 34s for a sample group. Nineteen items showed a ceiling effect, 3 items showed a floor effect. Internal consistency overall demonstrated a Cronbach Alpha of 0.846, while predetermined subsections showed Cronbach alphas of 0.335, 0.718, 0.736, and 0.896. Inter-item analysis found 2 pairs of items with strong correlation, with only 6 items correlating weakly. Item-total correlation showed 19 items correlated well. Exploratory Factor analysis (EFA) with principal component analysis produced 5 components with Eigenvalues >1 of which 4/5 had satisfactory Cronbach alphas. Test-retest reliability showed no significant differences across single and average measures (p ≤ 0.001). Interpretation B-PROM is the first BO-specific PROM to be systematically evaluated. Validation findings show strong internal consistency, short completion time, low missingness and excellent test-retest reliability. Funding Medtronic Limited ISR-2016-1077.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Ratcliffe
- Gastroenterology Department, Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James Britton
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Gastroenterology Department, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Sharon Baines
- Gastroenterology Department, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Neeraj Prasad
- Gastroenterology Department, Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Richard Keld
- Gastroenterology Department, Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Mark Murgatroyd
- Gastroenterology Department, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, UK
| | - Miguel Montenegro
- Surgery and Oncology Research Team (SORT), St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Elaine Viloria
- Surgery and Oncology Research Team (SORT), St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - John McLaughlin
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Gastroenterology Department, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Shaheen Hamdy
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Gastroenterology Department, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Yeng Ang
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Gastroenterology Department, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust, Salford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fukuda S, Watanabe K, Takahashi S, Yoshida T, Fujimori S, Komatsu T, Shimodaira Y, Matsuhashi T, Iijima K. Disproportionate cancer worries in ultra-short-segment Barrett's esophagus in Japan. DEN OPEN 2024; 4:e329. [PMID: 38223912 PMCID: PMC10787273 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Objectives Although Barrett's esophagus (BE), especially ultra-short-segment BE (USSBE), is very frequently diagnosed in Japan, how subjects feel about receiving a diagnosis of BE is unclear. We therefore prospectively investigated cancer worry in subjects who received a BE diagnosis. Methods Self-administered questionnaires were sent to subjects who were diagnosed with BE at three health checkup institutes in Akita Prefecture, Japan. The cancer worry scale (CWS) was used to quantitatively assess the fear of developing cancer. The BE subjects were classified into USSBE <1 cm and non-USSBE ≥1 cm groups. Factors associated with the CWS were investigated using logistic regression analyses. Results A total of 325 (31%) subjects, comprising 229 USSBE and 96 non-USSBE patients were included in this study. Compared with the USSBE group, the non-USSBE group had a significantly higher frequency of a history of a BE diagnosis and perception of carcinogenesis. However, the CWS was similar between the USSBE and non-USSBE groups, with a median CWS of 12.5 (3.75) versus 12.7 (3.65). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that while positive reflux symptoms were significantly associated with a positive CWS, the BE length was not significantly associated with it, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.3 (0.75-2.2). Conclusions A BE diagnosis promotes a similar level of worry about cancer among subjects, irrespective of the length of BE. In Japan, since USSBE poses a much lower cancer risk than non-USSBE, the former may frequently be associated with a disproportionate cancer worry relative to the latter. (UMIN000044010).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sho Fukuda
- Department of GastroenterologyAkita University Graduate School of MedicineAkitaJapan
| | - Kenta Watanabe
- Department of GastroenterologyAkita University Graduate School of MedicineAkitaJapan
| | - So Takahashi
- Department of GastroenterologyAkita University Graduate School of MedicineAkitaJapan
| | - Tatsuki Yoshida
- Department of GastroenterologyAkita University Graduate School of MedicineAkitaJapan
| | - Shusei Fujimori
- Department of GastroenterologyYokote Municipal HospitalAkitaJapan
| | - Taiga Komatsu
- Department of AnesthesiologyHonjo‐Daiichi HospitalAkitaJapan
| | - Yosuke Shimodaira
- Department of GastroenterologyAkita University Graduate School of MedicineAkitaJapan
| | - Tamotsu Matsuhashi
- Department of GastroenterologyAkita University Graduate School of MedicineAkitaJapan
| | - Katsunori Iijima
- Department of GastroenterologyAkita University Graduate School of MedicineAkitaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ratcliffe E, Britton J, Heal C, Keld R, Murgatroyd M, Willert R, McLaughlin J, Hamdy S, Ang Y. Quality of life measures in dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus are comparable to patients with non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus and do not improve after endoscopic therapy. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2023; 10:bmjgast-2022-001091. [PMID: 37041020 PMCID: PMC10105999 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is a precursor lesion, via dysplastic phases, to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Although overall risk from BO is low, it has been shown to adversely affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The aim was to compare dysplastic BO patients' HRQOL pre-endoscopic therapy (pre-ET) and post-ET. The pre-ET BO group was also compared with other cohorts: non-dysplastic BO (NDBO), those with colonic polyps, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and healthy volunteers. DESIGN Participants in the pre-ET cohort were recruited prior to their endotherapy and HRQOL questionnaires provided pre-ET and post-ET. Wilcoxon rank test was used to compare the pre-ET and post-ET findings. The Pre-ET group was compared to the other cohorts' HRQOL results using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS Pre-ET group of 69 participants returned the questionnaires prior to and 42 post-ET. Both the pre-ET and post-ET group showed similar levels of cancer worry, despite the treatment. No statistical significance was found for symptoms scores, anxiety and depression or general health measures with the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score. Education for the BO patients was overall lacking with many of the pre-ET group still reporting unanswered questions about their disease.The Pre-ET group was compared with NDBO group (N=379), GORD (N=132), colonic polyp patients (N=152) and healthy volunteers (N=48). Cancer worry was similar between the NDBO group and the Pre-ET group, despite their lower risk of progression. GORD patients had worse symptom scores from a reflux and heartburn perspective. Only the healthy group has significantly better scores in the SF-36 and improved hospital anxiety and depression scores. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that there is a need to improve HRQOL for patients with BO. This should include improved education and devising-specific patient-reported outcome measures for BO to capture relevant areas of HRQOL in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Ratcliffe
- Gastroenterology Department, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James Britton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Manchester, UK
| | - Calvin Heal
- School of Health Sciences, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Keld
- Gastroenterology Department, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Mark Murgatroyd
- Gastroenterology Department, Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, UK
| | - Robert Willert
- Gastroenterology Department, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - John McLaughlin
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Manchester, UK
| | - Shaheen Hamdy
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Manchester, UK
| | - Yeng Ang
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Ende-van Loon MCM, Nieuwkerk PT, van Stiphout SHC, Scheffer RCH, de Ridder RJJ, Pouw RE, Alkhalaf A, Weusten BLAM, Curvers WL, Schoon EJ. Barrett Esophagus: Quality of life and factors associated with illness perception. United European Gastroenterol J 2022; 10:721-729. [PMID: 35795902 PMCID: PMC9486561 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health‐related Quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE), a premalignant condition, may be influenced by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and the risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods We aim to investigate HRQoL in non‐dysplastic Barrett Esophagus (NDBE) patients, identify factors associated with a negative illness perception of the diagnosis BE and compare outcomes between patients treated in a specialized BE center with non‐expert centers. In this multi‐center cross‐sectional study, HRQoL of NDBE patients were assessed using the Short Form 36, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Cancer worry Scale, and Reflux Disease Questionnaire. A multivariable, linear regression analysis was conducted to assess factors associated with illness perception (Illness perception scale) of the BE diagnosis. Outcome parameters of patients from expert centers were compared to non‐expert centers. Results A total of 859 NDBE patients (mean age 63.6% and 74.5% male), of which 640 from BE expert centers were included. BE patients scored similar or higher means (i.e. better) on generic HRQoL in comparison with a Dutch norm population. The multivariable regression model showed that cancer worry, GERD symptoms, signs of anxiety and depression, and female gender were associated with a negative illness perception of BE. GERD symptoms were reported in the minority (22.4%) of BE patients. Levels of anxiety symptoms were comparable to a Dutch norm population (mean 3.7 vs. 3.9 p 0.183) and lower for depression symptoms (mean 6.8 vs. 7.6 p < 0.001). Overall, there were no differences found on outcomes between expert centers and non‐expert centers. Conclusion NDBE patients scored similar or better on generic HRQoL, anxiety and depression than an age and gender matched norm population. The presence of cancer worry, gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and depression, and female gender are factors associated with a negative illness perception of the diagnosis BE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pythia T Nieuwkerk
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Robert C H Scheffer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier J J de Ridder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alaa Alkhalaf
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ratcliffe E, Britton J, Hamdy S, McLaughlin J, Ang Y. Developing patient-orientated Barrett's oesophagus services: the role of dedicated services. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2022; 9:bmjgast-2021-000829. [PMID: 35193888 PMCID: PMC8867250 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) is common and is a precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma with a 0.33% per annum risk of progression. Surveillance and follow-up services for BO have been shown to be lacking, with studies showing inadequate adherence to guidelines and patients reporting a need for greater disease-specific knowledge. This review explores the emerging role of dedicated services for patients with BO. Methods A literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, HMIC, BNI, CiNAHL, AMED and PsycINFO in regard to dedicated BO care pathways was undertaken. Results Prospective multicentre and randomised trials were lacking. Published cohort data are encouraging with improvements in guideline adherence with dedicated services, with one published study showing significant improvements in dysplasia detection rates. Accuracy of allocation to surveillance endoscopy has been shown to hold cost savings, and a study of a dedicated clinic showed increased discharges from unnecessary surveillance. Training modalities for BO surveillance and dysplasia detection exist, which could be used to educate a BO workforce. Qualitative and quantitative studies have shown patients report high levels of cancer worry and poor disease-specific knowledge, but few studies have explored follow-up care models despite being a patient and clinician priority for research. Conclusions Cost–benefit analysis for dedicated services, considering both financial and environmental impacts, and more robust clinical data must be obtained to support this model of care in the wider health service. Greater understanding is needed of the root causes for poor guideline adherence, and disease-specific models of care should be designed around clinical and patient-reported outcomes to address the unmet needs of patients with BO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Ratcliffe
- Gastroenterology, Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Leigh, UK .,School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - James Britton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Shaheen Hamdy
- School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - John McLaughlin
- School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Yeng Ang
- School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van der Ende-van Loon M, Brouwers M, de Munnik S, Nieuwkerk P, Curvers W, Schoon E. Factors influencing health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a qualitative focus group study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 34:161-167. [PMID: 33470701 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Barrett's esophagus is a premalignant condition in the lower part of the esophagus, caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease. Previous studies found that having a Barrett's esophagus is associated with a significant decrease of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Over the past decade, a considerable amount of literature has been published on the development of endoscopic treatment for (early) neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Though, currently very little is known about the impact of those endoscopic treatments on HRQOL from the perspective of patients. In this study, we aim to assess the factors influencing HRQOL according to Barrett's esophagus patients. METHODS By using a qualitative focus group design, patients with nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus and patients with a history of endoscopic treatment for Barrett's dysplasia were included. Data were analysed following the conventional content analyses approach. RESULTS A total of 34 patients participated in the four focus group sessions. Experiencing symptoms was valued as the most important factor in both groups. Other factors identified as important HRQOL influencers were: use of medication, fear of cancer and trust in physicians and endoscopic procedures. CONCLUSIONS In general, Barrett's esophagus patients experienced a good HRQOL, with a minimal emotional burden from the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus. Most influencing factor on HRQOL was: experiencing reflux and dyspepsia symptoms. This study underlines the importance of adequate gastroesophageal reflux treatment and providing information to Barrett's esophagus patients, tailored to their personal needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Suzanne de Munnik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Erik Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pilonis ND, Killcoyne S, Tan WK, O'Donovan M, Malhotra S, Tripathi M, Miremadi A, Debiram-Beecham I, Evans T, Phillips R, Morris DL, Vickery C, Harrison J, di Pietro M, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo J, Haidry R, Kerridge A, Sasieni PD, Fitzgerald RC. Use of a Cytosponge biomarker panel to prioritise endoscopic Barrett's oesophagus surveillance: a cross-sectional study followed by a real-world prospective pilot. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:270-278. [PMID: 35030332 PMCID: PMC8803607 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00667-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic surveillance is recommended for patients with Barrett's oesophagus because, although the progression risk is low, endoscopic intervention is highly effective for high-grade dysplasia and cancer. However, repeated endoscopy has associated harms and access has been limited during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the role of a non-endoscopic device (Cytosponge) coupled with laboratory biomarkers and clinical factors to prioritise endoscopy for Barrett's oesophagus. METHODS We first conducted a retrospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study in patients older than 18 years who were having endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus (with intestinal metaplasia confirmed by TFF3 and a minimum Barrett's segment length of 1 cm [circumferential or tongues by the Prague C and M criteria]). All patients had received the Cytosponge and confirmatory endoscopy during the BEST2 (ISRCTN12730505) and BEST3 (ISRCTN68382401) clinical trials, from July 7, 2011, to April 1, 2019 (UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio 9461). Participants were divided into training (n=557) and validation (n=334) cohorts to identify optimal risk groups. The biomarkers evaluated were overexpression of p53, cellular atypia, and 17 clinical demographic variables. Endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia or cancer was the primary endpoint. Clinical feasibility of a decision tree for Cytosponge triage was evaluated in a real-world prospective cohort from Aug 27, 2020 (DELTA; ISRCTN91655550; n=223), in response to COVID-19 and the need to provide an alternative to endoscopic surveillance. FINDINGS The prevalence of high-grade dysplasia or cancer determined by the current gold standard of endoscopic biopsy was 17% (92 of 557 patients) in the training cohort and 10% (35 of 344) in the validation cohort. From the new biomarker analysis, three risk groups were identified: high risk, defined as atypia or p53 overexpression or both on Cytosponge; moderate risk, defined by the presence of a clinical risk factor (age, sex, and segment length); and low risk, defined as Cytosponge-negative and no clinical risk factors. The risk of high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer in the high-risk group was 52% (68 of 132 patients) in the training cohort and 41% (31 of 75) in the validation cohort, compared with 2% (five of 210) and 1% (two of 185) in the low-risk group, respectively. In the real-world setting, Cytosponge results prospectively identified 39 (17%) of 223 patients as high risk (atypia or p53 overexpression, or both) requiring endoscopy, among whom the positive predictive value was 31% (12 of 39 patients) for high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer and 44% (17 of 39) for any grade of dysplasia. INTERPRETATION Cytosponge atypia, p53 overexpression, and clinical risk factors (age, sex, and segment length) could be used to prioritise patients for endoscopy. Further investigation could validate their use in clinical practice and lead to a substantial reduction in endoscopy procedures compared with current surveillance pathways. FUNDING Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK, Innovate UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Killcoyne
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - W Keith Tan
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Maria O'Donovan
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shalini Malhotra
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Monika Tripathi
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ahmad Miremadi
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Irene Debiram-Beecham
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tara Evans
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rosemary Phillips
- Department of Gastroenterology, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK
| | - Danielle L Morris
- Department of Gastroenterology, East and North Herts NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK
| | - Craig Vickery
- Department of Surgery, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, UK
| | - Jon Harrison
- Department of Gastroenterology, Harrogate District Hospital, Harrogate, UK
| | | | - Jacobo Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rehan Haidry
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Abigail Kerridge
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter D Sasieni
- Cancer Prevention Group in Clinical Trials Unit, King's Clinical Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca C Fitzgerald
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van der Ende-van Loon MCM, Stoker A, Nieuwkerk PT, Curvers WL, Schoon EJ. How are we measuring health-related quality of life in patients with a Barrett Esophagus? A systematic review on patient-reported outcome measurements. Qual Life Res 2021; 31:1639-1656. [PMID: 34748137 PMCID: PMC9098608 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03009-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Barrett esophagus (BE) is associated with a significant decrease of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Too often, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are applied without considering what they measure and for which purposes they are suitable. With this systematic review, we provide researchers and physicians with an overview of all the instruments previously used for measuring HRQoL in BE patients and which PROMs are most appropriate from the patient’s perspective. Methods A comprehensive search was performed to identify all PROMs used for measuring HRQoL in BE patients, to identify factors influencing HRQoL according to BE patients, and to evaluate each PROM from a patients’ perspective. Results Among the 27 studies, a total of 32 different HRQoL instruments were identified. None of these instruments were designed or validated for use in BE patients. Four qualitative studies were identified exploring factors influencing HRQoL in the perceptions of BE patients. These factors included fear of cancer, anxiety, trust in physician, sense of control, uncertainty, worry, burden of endoscopy, knowledge and understanding, gastrointestinal symptoms, sleeping difficulties, diet and lifestyle, use of medication, and support of family and friends. Conclusion None of the quantitative studies measuring HRQoL in BE patients sufficiently reflected the perceptions of HRQoL in BE patients. Only gastrointestinal symptoms and anxiety were addressed in the majority of the studies. For the selection of PROMs, we encourage physicians and researchers measuring HRQoL to choose their PROMs from a patient perspective and not strictly based on health professionals’ definitions of what is relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A Stoker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - P T Nieuwkerk
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W L Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - E J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,GROW: School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ten Kate CA, Rietman AB, Kamphuis LS, Gischler S, Lee D, Fruithof J, Wijnen RMH, Spaander MCM. Patient-driven healthcare recommendations for adults with esophageal atresia and their families. J Pediatr Surg 2021; 56:1932-1939. [PMID: 33455804 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with esophageal atresia (EA) require a multidisciplinary follow-up approach, taking into account gastroesophageal problems, respiratory problems and psychosocial wellbeing. Too little is known about the full scope of these individuals' healthcare needs. We aimed to map all medical and psychosocial needs of adults with EA and their family members, and to formulate healthcare recommendations for daily practice. METHODS A qualitative study was performed, using data from recorded semi-structured interviews with two focus groups, one consisting of adult patients with EA (n = 15) and one of their family members (n = 13). After verbatim transcription and computerized thematic analysis, results were organized according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Ethical approval had been obtained. RESULTS Healthcare needs were described through 74 codes, classified into 20 themes. Most important findings for patients included the impact of gastrointestinal and pulmonary problems on daily life, long-term emotional distress of patients and parents and the need of a standardized multidisciplinary follow-up program during both child- and adulthood. CONCLUSION The focus groups revealed numerous physical and mental health problems, as well as social difficulties, that require attention from different healthcare providers. We have formulated several healthcare recommendations that physicians may use in long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal A Ten Kate
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - André B Rietman
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lieke S Kamphuis
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Saskia Gischler
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Demi Lee
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - JoAnne Fruithof
- Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula Support Federation & VOKS, Netherlands
| | - René M H Wijnen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manon C M Spaander
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Treml J, Kreuser N, Gockel I, Kersting A. Anxiety and depression in patients with Barrett's esophagus: estimates of disorder rates and associations with symptom load and treatment-seeking. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33:825-831. [PMID: 33136727 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) may experience psychological burden from living with a chronic medical condition, which has been identified as the most important risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to estimate rates of depression and anxiety in a large sample of patients with BE. METHODS A total of 794 patients with endoscopically and histologically confirmed diagnosis of BE completed validated screening instruments for depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). Screening rates in the study sample were compared to general population estimates. Multivariable regression analyses were used to model associations between outcome variables and respondents' sociodemographic characteristics, BE-related symptom load and incidence of inpatient treatment due to BE in the last 12 months. RESULTS Rates of positive screens were 14.2% for depression and 9.9% for anxiety. For several age by sex subgroups, rates of depression and anxiety were about three to five times higher in the study sample than in the general population. BE-related reflux and pain symptoms showed strong associations with higher levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms, while the effect of treatment was small. CONCLUSION Study results indicate that a relevant proportion of patients with BE is at an increased risk for depression and anxiety, compared to general population controls. Lacking information on patients' disease characteristics limited generalizability of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Treml
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Leipzig
| | - Nicole Kreuser
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ines Gockel
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Britton J, Taxiarchi P, Martin G, Willert R, Horne M, Hamdy S, McLaughlin J, Ang Y. Comparative quantitative survey of patient experience in Barrett's oesophagus and other gastrointestinal disorders. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2020; 7:e000357. [PMID: 32337055 PMCID: PMC7170407 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess health-related quality of life in patients with non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus (NDBO) and endoscopically treated dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus (DBO). Design This quantitative, self-administered questionnaire study was conducted across three National Health Service hospitals. Data were collected from three other cohorts; gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), colonic polyp surveillance and healthy individuals. Fisher's exact and Spearman's rank correlation tests were used for analysis. Propensity score matching adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities. Results 687 participants were eligible for analysis (NDBO n=306, DBO n=49, GORD n=132, colonic polyps n=152 and healthy n=48). 53% of NDBO participants reported similarly high cancer worry, comparable to DBO (50%, p=0.933) and colonic polyp participants (51%, p=0.355). Less cancer worry was reported in GORD participants (43.4%, p=0.01 vs NDBO). NDBO participants reported anxiety in 15.8% and depression in 8.6% of cases, which was similar to the other disease cohorts. Moderate or severe heartburn or acid regurgitation was found in 11% and 10%, respectively, in the NDBO cohort, comparable to DBO participants (heartburn 2% p=0.172, acid regurgitation 4% p=0.31) but lower (better) than GORD participants (heartburn 31% p=<0.001, acid regurgitation 25% p=0.001). NDBO participants with moderate or severe GORD symptoms were associated with higher rates of anxiety (p=<0.001), depression (p=<0.001) and cancer worry (p=<0.001). NDBO patients appropriately perceiving their cancer risk as low had lower rates of cancer worry (p=<0.001). Conclusion This study provides insight into the problems Barrett's oesophagus patients may face. Future care pathways must be more patient focussed to address misconceptions of cancer risk, oesophageal cancer related worry and GORD symptom control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Britton
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.,Gastroenterology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Paraskevi Taxiarchi
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Glen Martin
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Robert Willert
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Maria Horne
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Shaheen Hamdy
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.,Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - John McLaughlin
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.,Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Yeng Ang
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.,Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Katzka DA, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Phenotypes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Where Rome, Lyon, and Montreal Meet. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:767-776. [PMID: 31319183 PMCID: PMC6960363 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is now one of the most common diagnoses made in a gastroenterology practice. From a conventional pathophysiological perspective, GERD is conceptualized as incompetence of the antireflux barrier at the esophagogastric junction; the more severe that incompetence, the worse the disease. However, it is increasingly clear that many presentations of GERD represent distinct phenotypes with unique predisposing cofactors and pathophysiology outside of this paradigm. Three major consensus initiatives have grappled with this dilemma (the Montreal Consensus, The Rome Foundation, and the Lyon Consensus), each from a different perspective. Montreal struggled to define the disease, Rome sought to characterize its functional attributes, while Lyon examined its physiological attributes. Here, we merge the 3 perspectives, developing the concept that what has come to be known as GERD is actually a family of syndromes with a complex matrix of contributing pathophysiology. A corollary to this is that the concept of one size fits all to therapeutics does not apply, and that although escalating treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may be pertinent to healing esophagitis, its applicability beyond that is highly questionable. Similarly, failing to recognize the modulating effects of anxiety, hypervigilance, and visceral and central hypersensitivity on symptom severity has greatly oversimplified the problem. That oversimplification has led to excessive use of PPIs for everything captured under the GERD umbrella and shown a broad spectrum of syndromes less amenable to PPI therapy in any dose. It is with this in mind that we delineate this precision medicine concept of GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John E Pandolfino
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Peter J Kahrilas
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Paterson AL, Gehrung M, Fitzgerald RC, O'Donovan M. Role of TFF3 as an adjunct in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus using a minimally invasive esophageal sampling device-The Cytosponge TM. Diagn Cytopathol 2019; 48:253-264. [PMID: 31814330 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of esophageal carcinoma continues to increase whilst its prognosis remains poor. The most dramatic reduction in mortality is likely to follow early diagnosis of the preinvasive precursor lesion, Barrett's esophagus (BE), coupled with treatment of dysplastic lesions. The major risk factor for BE is gastroesophageal reflux disease, however this is highly prevalent and only a small proportion of individuals have BE, therefore an endoscopy-based screening strategy to detect BE is unfeasible. Minimally invasive esophageal sampling devices offer an alternative, cost-effective strategy which can be deployed within an at-risk population in a primary care setting to identify individuals with probable BE who can then be referred for endoscopic confirmation. The device that has currently progressed furthest in clinical trials is the CytospongeTM which collects cells from the gastric cardia, gastroesophageal junction and along the whole esophageal length. The cell sample is processed into a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded block and sections assessed for the presence of intestinal metaplasia. TFF3 immunohistochemistry has consistently been shown to be a valuable adjunct that increases the accuracy of the CytospongeTM test by highlighting early goblet cells which may be missed on morphological assessment and by allowing pseudogoblet cells to be differentiated from true goblet cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna L Paterson
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marcel Gehrung
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Maria O'Donovan
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.,MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Peters Y, Al-Kaabi A, Shaheen NJ, Chak A, Blum A, Souza RF, Di Pietro M, Iyer PG, Pech O, Fitzgerald RC, Siersema PD. Barrett oesophagus. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5:35. [PMID: 31123267 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-019-0086-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Barrett oesophagus (BE), the only known histological precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), is a condition in which the squamous epithelium of the oesophagus is replaced by columnar epithelium as an adaptive response to gastro-oesophageal reflux. EAC has one of the fastest rising incidences of cancers in Western countries and has a dismal prognosis. BE is usually detected during endoscopic examination, and diagnosis is confirmed by the histological presence of intestinal metaplasia. Advances in genomics and transcriptomics have improved our understanding of the pathogenesis and malignant progression of intestinal metaplasia. As the majority of EAC cases are diagnosed in individuals without a known history of BE, screening for BE could potentially decrease disease-related mortality. Owing to the pre-malignant nature of BE, endoscopic surveillance of patients with BE is imperative for early detection and treatment of dysplasia to prevent further progression to invasive EAC. Developments in endoscopic therapy have resulted in a major shift in the treatment of patients with BE who have dysplasia or early EAC, from surgical resection to endoscopic resection and ablation. In addition to symptom control by optimization of lifestyle and pharmacological therapy with proton pump inhibitors, chemopreventive strategies based on NSAIDs and statins are currently being investigated for BE management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonne Peters
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ali Al-Kaabi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew Blum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rhonda F Souza
- Department of Medicine and the Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas and the Center for Esophageal Research, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Prasad G Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology, St John of God Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Britton J, Chatten K, Riley T, Keld RR, Hamdy S, McLaughlin J, Ang Y. Dedicated service improves the accuracy of Barrett's oesophagus surveillance: a prospective comparative cohort study. Frontline Gastroenterol 2019; 10:128-134. [PMID: 31205652 PMCID: PMC6540283 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Standards for Barrett's oesophagus (BO) surveillance in the UK are outlined in the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines. This study aimed to assess the quality of current surveillance delivery compared with a dedicated service. DESIGN All patients undergoing BO surveillance between January 2016 and July 2017 at a single National Health Service district general hospital were included. Patients had their endoscopy routed to a dedicated BO endoscopy list or a generic service list. Prospective data were analysed against the BSG guidelines and also compared with each patient's prior surveillance endoscopy. RESULTS 361 patients were scheduled for surveillance of which 217 attended the dedicated list, 78 attended the non-dedicated list and 66 did not have their endoscopy. The dedicated list adhered more closely to the BSG guidelines when compared with the non-dedicated and prior endoscopy, respectively; Prague classification (100% vs 87.3% vs 82.5%, p<0.0001), hiatus hernia delineation (100% vs 64.8% vs 63.3%, p<0.0001), location and number of biopsies recorded (99.5% vs 5.6% vs 6.9%, p<0.0001), Seattle protocol adherence (72% vs 42% vs 50%, p<0.0001) and surveillance interval adherence (dedicated 100% vs prior endoscopy 75%, p<0.0001). Histology results from the dedicated and non-dedicated list cohorts revealed similar rates of intestinal metaplasia (79.8% vs 73.1%, p=0.12) and dysplasia/oesophageal adenocarcinoma (4.3% vs 2.6%, p=0.41). CONCLUSIONS The post-BSG guideline era of BO surveillance remains suboptimal in this UK hospital setting. A dedicated service appears to improve the accuracy and consistency of surveillance care, although the clinical significance of this remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Britton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK,Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kelly Chatten
- Department of Gastroenterology, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, Stockport, UK
| | - Tom Riley
- Department of Gastroenterology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Richard R Keld
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Shaheen Hamdy
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - John McLaughlin
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Yeng Ang
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Britton J, Hamdy S, McLaughlin J, Horne M, Ang Y. Barrett's oesophagus: A qualitative study of patient burden, care delivery experience and follow-up needs. Health Expect 2018; 22:21-33. [PMID: 30430714 PMCID: PMC6351418 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Barrett's oesophagus (BO), a precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma, requires long‐term endoscopic surveillance. The rising incidence of this chronic disease has implications for service provision and patient burden. Few studies have explored BO patients’ personal burden, care delivery experience and participation in health‐care delivery decisions. Objective To identify and explore factors impacting BO patients’ health‐related quality of life, follow‐up needs and views on new models of follow‐up care. Design An exploratory qualitative approach was adopted using semi‐structured, in‐depth, one‐to‐one interviews, audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Patients undergoing BO surveillance, at a single NHS hospital, were recruited using purposive sampling with the aim of achieving maximum variation. Data were analysed using framework analysis approach, supported by NVivo Pro 11. Results Data saturation occurred after 20 participant interviews. Ten subthemes and three main themes emerged from the analysis: (a) burden of disease—symptom control, worry of oesophageal cancer and surveillance endoscopy; (b) follow‐up experiences—follow‐up care, at this NHS hospital, was found to be inconsistent and often inadequate to meet patients’ needs, in particular a lack of disease‐specific information; and (c) follow‐up needs—participants sought enhanced communication, organization and structure of care. They highly valued face‐to‐face interaction with a specialist, and the concept of direct secondary care access in‐between endoscopies was reassuring to participants. Conclusions This qualitative research provides an in‐depth account of the patients’ perspective of BO, the effectiveness of follow‐up care and patient opinion on new follow‐up systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Britton
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.,Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Shaheen Hamdy
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.,Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - John McLaughlin
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.,Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Maria Horne
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds University School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Yeng Ang
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Triadafilopoulos G, Friedland S. Precision care for Barrett's esophagus. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3:67. [PMID: 30363757 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2018.09.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Modern recognition and management of Barrett's esophagus, a precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma depends on diagnostic accuracy, risk assessment, technical expertise and consideration of many options to best tailor therapy for every patient. Concomitant management of acid reflux is essential, frequently with proton pump inhibitors. Ablation and resection favorably affect the evolution towards cancer. Using precision medicine tools, such as imaging, molecular diagnostics and analytics may lead to cost- and comparatively-effective therapies ultimately aiming at cancer prevention. Knowledge of the risk factors for Barrett's esophagus and progression to dysplasia and cancer can help tailor a precision medicine approach with more aggressive screening and surveillance targeted at patients that are most likely to benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Triadafilopoulos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Shai Friedland
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|