Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy (SOLSTICE): a randomised, open-label phase 3 study

TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with a hypertensive elderly patient: a case report

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignant tumor worldwide. Approximately 20%-25% of patients have metastases at the time of initial diagnosis, and nearly half eventually develop metastatic cancer. The standard first- and second-line treatments for unresectable metastatic CRC are full-dose two-/three-agent chemotherapy with or without a combination of molecularly targeted agents. However, many patients are ineligible for intensive therapy due to poor performance status or advanced age. TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) in combination with bevacizumab may provide a new treatment strategy for patients with advanced CRC who are ineligible for intensive therapy.

Case report description

We report a case of a 91-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction in the presence of multiple metastases. The patient had a history of hypertension, had suffered from deep vein thrombosis of the left lower extremity, and was allergic to several drugs. Genetic testing showed multiple mutations in Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS), Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PIK3CA), and Tumor Protein p53 (TP53); microsatellite stability; and a tumor mutational burden of 4.5 Mut/Mb. The patient was diagnosed with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction in May 2020, with a clinical stage of cTxNxM1. Without surgery, the patient received first-line treatment with capecitabine in combination with bevacizumab, which was changed to second-line treatment with TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab after disease progression, with a progression-free survival of 10 months, achieving a significant survival benefit. Later, due to the patient's poor physical condition, no further medication was administered, and the patient died on 1 September 2022.

Conclusion

TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab for the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic CRC who are ineligible for intensive therapy is a promising treatment option.

Sex-related differences in the efficacy and toxicity of cancer treatments

Differences between the biological sexes have long been observed in cancer incidence and prevalence, and in treatment outcomes including efficacy and toxicity. Ideally, there should be sufficient information to improve the individualization of cancer treatment by incorporating sex into treatment decisions. Necessary information should include: the nature and source of these differences; whether inherent to the specific cancer (such as molecular profiles, metabolic behaviors, and immune responses); the pathophysiological mechanisms of the specific cancer; or the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of different cancer drugs. The influence of gender, which is defined as the sociocultural construct that determines societal norms for males and females, should also be included in personalized decision-making. This review aimed to describe the current evidence on the impact of sex and gender on treatment effects, outcomes, and toxicity profiles in cancer patients. Data for the influence of gender were negligible, whereas clinical studies and meta-analyses in different cancer types have identified differences between males and females in the effectiveness on survival outcomes of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiotherapy. Similarly, toxicity profiles of different cancer treatments varied between sexes. Based on these observed differences, it seems clear that sex should be included as an important variable when individualizing treatment; however, more research into sex- and gender-related differences in cancer treatment efficacy and toxicity, and the causes for these differences, is required before this can be fully incorporated into individualized treatment programs in real-world clinical practice.

What Is Next for Refractory Colorectal Cancer CRC? Looking Beyond SUNLIGHT, FRESCO2, RECURSE and CORRECT

The treatment landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has undergone significant evolution, with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy dramatically altering the management of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. However, the majority of patients, particularly those with microsatellite-stable (MSS) disease, remain refractory to immunotherapy, necessitating the exploration of alternative therapeutic strategies. This review summarizes the current treatment options for heavily pretreated mCRC patients who are not eligible for targeted therapies or clinical trials. Approved therapies for refractory mCRC, including regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI), and fruquintinib, demonstrate modest survival benefits but are often associated with significant toxicities. Additionally, innovative approaches targeting specific mutations such as KRAS G12C, HER2 amplification, and BRAF V600E are discussed, highlighting emerging combination regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other agents to overcome resistance mechanisms. The potential of rechallenge strategies using previously administered therapies, such as oxaliplatin and anti-EGFR agents, is examined, supported by retrospective and prospective studies. Furthermore, the role of older drugs like mitomycin C in combination with capecitabine is revisited, offering insights into their viability in advanced treatment settings. Ongoing clinical trials with novel agents and combinations are expected to provide further clarity on optimizing sequential treatment regimens and personalizing therapy for mCRC patients. This review emphasizes the need for comprehensive molecular profiling and shared decision-making to improve outcomes and quality of life in this challenging patient population.

Construction and verification of a nutritional index-containing adverse reaction prediction model in colorectal cancer patients after chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with colorectal cancer are prone to adverse reactions after chemotherapy, but there is a lack of models for early prediction of these adverse reactions. Based on the correlation between nutritional status and chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy adverse reactions in malignant tumors of the digestive system, it is speculated that nutritional status can be used as a factor involved in prognostic models.

AIM

To explore the influencing factors of adverse reactions in patients with colorectal cancer after chemotherapy, and establish a prediction model containing nutritional indexes.

METHODS

A total of 210 patients with colorectal cancer who received chemotherapy in Zhejiang Qiushi Cardiovascular Hospital from July 2017 to March 2021 were selected as a model training set to analyze the incidence of adverse reactions after chemotherapy. The characteristic variables of adverse reactions after chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients were initially screened by Lasso regression. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors related to the development of adverse reaction in patients with colorectal cancer after chemotherapy. Based on the factors identified, a prediction model was developed. The calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the accuracy and differentiation of the model. In addition, 90 patients with colorectal cancer who received chemotherapy in Zhejiang Qiushi Cardiovascular Hospital from April 2021 to March 2024 were selected as a model validation set to verify the constructed nomogram model.

RESULTS

After one cycle of chemotherapy, of 210 patients with colorectal cancer in the modeling set, 85 (40.48%) patients with colorectal cancer in the model training group had adverse reactions (≥ Grade Ⅲ) and 125 (59.52%) had no adverse reactions and were included in the no-occurrence group. Lasso regression analysis showed that when the penalty coefficient λ = 0.072, the model had good performance and the least influencing factors. Six predictive variables were finally selected, which were age, lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score and the nutrition indexes albumin, total lymphocyte count, and hemoglobin. Logistic analysis showed that age, ECOG score, lactate dehydrogenase, and the nutritional indexes albumin, hemoglobin, and total lymphocyte count were all influencing factors of adverse reactions after chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients (P < 0.05). Based on these six influencing factors, a nomogram prediction model was established. The area under the ROC curve of the model for predicting chemotherapy adverse reactions in the training set was 0.811 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.754-0.869], and the consistency index of factors related to predicting the occurrence of chemotherapy adverse reactions in colorectal cancer patients was 0.839 (95%CI: 0.778-0.902), which was highly correlated with the actual observation results, suggesting that the model had good differentiation and accuracy. The validation set patient data was used to verify the nomogram model, and the results were compared with the actual results. The prediction sensitivity of the model was 94.44% (34/36), the specificity was 92.59% (50/54), and the total prediction accuracy was 93.33% (84/90).

CONCLUSION

Age, ECOG score, lactate dehydrogenase, and the nutri-tional indexes albumin, total lymphocyte count, and hemoglobin are all factors affecting the occurrence of chemotherapy adverse reactions in patients with colorectal cancer. The prediction model developed based on these indexes can accurately predict the risk of chemotherapy adverse reactions in patients, and provide a reference for clinical prevention and treatment.

Comprehensive review of signaling pathways and therapeutic targets in gastrointestinal cancers

Targeted therapy, the milestone in the development of human medicine, originated in 2004 when the FDA approved the first targeted agent bevacizumab for colorectal cancer treatment. This new development has resulted from drug developers moving beyond traditional chemotherapy, and several trials have popped up in the last two decades with an unprecedented speed. Specifically, EGF/EGFR, VEGF/VEGFR, HGF/c-MET, and Claudin 18.2 therapeutic targets have been developed in recent years. Some targets previously thought to be undruggable are now being newly explored, such as the RAS site. However, the efficacy of targeted therapy is extremely variable, especially with the emergence of new drugs and the innovative use of traditional targets for other tumors in recent years. Accordingly, this review provides an overview of the major signaling pathway mechanisms and recent advances in targeted therapy for gastrointestinal cancers, as well as future perspectives.

Pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies investigating trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab showed good tolerability in the phase 3 SOLSTICE (first-line) and SUNLIGHT (later-line) trials. This pooled analysis was performed to further characterize the safety of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab and to compare safety in untreated and previously treated patients with mCRC.

Methods

Patients must have received at least one dose of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab in SOLSTICE (NCT03869892) or SUNLIGHT (NCT04737187). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in SOLSTICE and SUNLIGHT were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events versions 4.03 and 5.0, respectively. Times to onset/resolution of grade ≥3 hematologic TEAEs were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were analyzed by age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS).

Results

The pooled safety population comprised 669 patients (SOLSTICE, n = 423; and SUNLIGHT, n = 246). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported more frequently in SOLSTICE than in SUNLIGHT (86.8% vs. 72.4%), the most common being neutropenia and anemia. Overall, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used in 30.6% of patients. Median time to resolution of grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events/neutropenia to grade ≤2 was 8 days. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were more frequent in patients aged ≥75 years and those with an ECOG PS of 0 versus 1 or 2.

Conclusions

FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab showed a consistent and manageable safety profile across first- and later-line mCRC treatment, including in vulnerable patients. Hematologic TEAEs were mostly reversible with appropriate management.

Metagenomic analysis during capecitabine therapy reveals microbial chemoprotective mechanisms and predicts drug toxicity in colorectal cancer patients

Purpose

Unpredictable chemotherapy side effects are a major barrier to successful treatment. Cell culture and mouse experiments indicate that the gut microbiota is influenced by and influences anti-cancer drugs. However, metagenomic data from patients paired to careful side effect monitoring remains limited. Herein, we focus on the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine (CAP). We investigate CAP-microbiome interactions through metagenomic sequencing of longitudinal stool sampling from a cohort of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Methods

We established a prospective cohort study including 56 patients with advanced CRC treated with CAP monotherapy across 4 centers in the Netherlands. Stool samples and clinical questionnaires were collected at baseline, during cycle 3, and post-treatment. Metagenomic sequencing to assess microbial community structure and gene abundance was paired with transposon mutagenesis, targeted gene deletion, and media supplementation experiments. An independent US cohort was used for model validation.

Results

CAP treatment significantly altered gut microbial composition and pathway abundance, enriching for menaquinol (vitamin K2) biosynthesis genes. Transposon library screens, targeted gene deletions, and media supplementation confirmed that menaquinol biosynthesis protects Escherichia coli from drug toxicity. Microbial menaquinol biosynthesis genes were associated with decreased peripheral sensory neuropathy. Machine learning models trained in this cohort predicted hand-foot syndrome and dose reductions in an independent cohort.

Conclusion

These results suggest treatment-associated increases in microbial vitamin biosynthesis serve a chemoprotective role for bacterial and host cells, with implications for toxicities outside the gastrointestinal tract. We provide a proof-of-concept for the use of microbiome profiling and machine learning to predict drug toxicities across independent cohorts. These observations provide a foundation for future human intervention studies, more in-depth mechanistic dissection in preclinical models, and extension to other cancer treatments.

Clinical Trial Data Review of the Combination FTD/TPI + Bevacizumab in the Treatment Landscape of Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Recommended first and second line treatments for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-based therapy, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapies. In third line, the SUNLIGHT trial showed that trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab (FTD/TPI + BEV) provided significant survival benefits and as such is now a recommended third line regimen in patients with refractory mCRC, irrespective of RAS mutational status and previous anti-VEGF treatment. Some patients are not candidates for intensive combination chemotherapy as first-line therapy due to age, low tumor burden, performance status and/or comorbidities. Capecitabine (CAP) + BEV is recommended in these patients. In the SOLSTICE trial, FTD/TPI + BEV as a first line regimen in patients not eligible for intensive therapy was not superior to CAP + BEV in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). However, in SOLSTICE, FTD/TPI + BEV resulted in similar PFS, overall survival, and maintenance of quality of life as CAP + BEV, with a different safety profile. FTD/TPI + BEV offers a possible first line alternative in patients for whom CAP + BEV is an unsuitable treatment. This narrative review explores and summarizes the clinical trial data on FTD/TPI + BEV.

Updates on the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults

Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health challenge. Notably, the risk of CRC escalates with age, with the majority of cases occurring in those over the age of 65. Despite recent progress in tailoring treatments for early and advanced CRC, there is a lack of prospective data to guide the management of older patients, who are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. This article reviews the contemporary landscape of managing older individuals with CRC, highlighting recent advancements and persisting challenges. The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is explored. Opportunities for treatment escalation/de-escalation, with consideration of the older adult's fitness level. are reviewed in the neoadjuvant, surgical, adjuvant, and metastatic settings of colon and rectal cancers. Immunotherapy is shown to be an effective treatment option in older adults who have CRC with microsatellite instability. Promising new technologies such as circulating tumor DNA and recent phase III trials adding later-line systemic therapy options are discussed. Clinical recommendations based on the data available are summarized. We conclude that deliberate efforts to include older individuals in future colorectal cancer trials are essential to better guide the management of these patients in this rapidly evolving field.

Role played by MDSC in colitis-associated colorectal cancer and potential therapeutic strategies

Colitis-associated colorectal cancer has been a hot topic in public health issues worldwide. Numerous studies have demonstrated the significance of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the progression of this ailment, but the specific mechanism of their role in the transformation of inflammation to cancer is unclear, and potential therapies targeting MDSC are also unclear. This paper outlines the possible involvement of MDSC to the development of colitis-associated colorectal cancer. It also explores the immune and other relevant roles played by MDSC, and collates relevant targeted therapies against MDSC. In addition, current targeted therapies for colorectal cancer are analyzed and summarized.

Sunglasses for Sunlight: Considerations on New Treatment Opportunities for Refractory Colorectal Cancer

In 2023, two seminal studies were disseminated that significantly augmented the pharmacological armamentarium for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCRC) [...].

Update on the management of elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common tumours worldwide, and 70% of CRC patients are over 65 years of age. However, the scientific evidence available for these patients is poor, as they are underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours, (TTD) and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD) have reviewed the scientific evidence available in older patients with CRC. This group of experts recommends a multidisciplinary approach and geriatric assessment (GA) before making a therapeutic decision because GA predicts the risk of toxicity and survival and helps to individualize treatment. In addition, elderly patients with localized CRC should undergo standard cancer resection, preferably laparoscopically. The indication for adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) should be considered based on the potential benefit, the risk of recurrence, the life expectancy and patient comorbidities. When the disease is metastatic, the possibility of radical treatment with surgery, radiofrequency (RF) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) should be considered. The efficacy of palliative CT is similar to that seen in younger patients, but elderly patients are at increased risk of toxicity. Clinical trials should be conducted with the elderly population and include GAs and specific treatment plans.

Assessing Frailty in Gastrointestinal Cancer: Two Diseases in One?

PURPOSEOF REVIEW

This review examines the challenges of treating gastrointestinal cancer in the aging population, focusing on the importance of frailty assessment. Emphasized are the rise in gastrointestinal cancer incidence in older adults, advances in frailty assessments for patients with gastrointestinal cancer, the development of novel frailty markers, and a summary of recent trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing evidence suggests that the use of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to identify frail older adults and individualize cancer care leads to lower toxicity and improved quality of life outcomes. However, the adoption of a full CGA prior to chemotherapy initiation in older cancer patients remains low. Recently, new frailty screening tools have emerged, including assessments designed to specifically predict chemotherapy-related adverse events. Additionally, frailty biomarkers have been developed, such as blood tests like IL-6 and performance tracking through physical activity monitors. The relevance of nutrition and muscle mass is discussed. Highlights from recent trials suggest the feasibility of successfully identifying patients most at risk of serious adverse events. There have been promising developments in identifying novel frailty markers and methods to screen for frailty in the older adult population. Further prospective trials that focus on and address the needs of the geriatric population for early identification of frailty in cancer care, facilitating a more tailored treatment approach. Practicing oncologists should select a frailty assessment to implement into their routine practice and adjust treatment accordingly.

Selecting Optimal First-Line Treatment for Microsatellite Stable and Non-Mutated RAS/BRAF Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Standard frontline treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is cytotoxic chemotherapy plus a biologic agent such as an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or panitumumab) or anti-VEGF antibody (bevacizumab). Predictive biomarkers include mismatch repair (MMR) status, and RAS and BRAF mutation status; and important factors in treatment selection include primary tumor location, intent of therapy, and potential toxicity, as well as patient age, comorbidities, and patient preference. To date, single-, double-, or triple-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy all have important roles in appropriately selected patients, with the addition of anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR antibody therapy based on the relevant predictive biomarker. Data indicate that patients with proficient MMR, RAS/BRAF wt mCRC are candidates for an anti-EGFR antibody plus doublet chemotherapy if they have a left-sided primary tumor, or for anti-VEGF (bevacizumab) plus doublet or triplet chemotherapy if they have a right-sided primary tumor. Future studies may provide more predictive biomarkers to further personalize therapy for this heterogeneous disease.

Evidence-Based Care of Older Adults With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Insights From Landmark Clinical Trials

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States with more than half of the patients diagnosed being older than 65 years, and an expected further increase in older adults (OA) diagnosed with this cancer in the coming years as the population ages. Prospective data guiding the management of older patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) have been limited and treatment decisions for these patients are often guided by chronologic age, crude evaluation of performance status, and extrapolation from trials conducted in younger individuals. Recent evidence from randomized clinical trials specifically designed for OA supports treatment deintensification and dose modification to increase tolerability without compromising efficacy in older, frailer patients with mCRC. Additional studies support the incorporation of geriatric assessment (GA)-driven care to further improve the outcomes of OA with mCRC. Although the use of GA has not been validated in guiding specific treatment selection or modification for OA with mCRC, it provides a comprehensive and objective evaluation of a patient's functional status, comorbidities, risk of potential toxicities, effect on the quality of life, goals of care, and assists with personalizing therapy. With the increase in the number of OA we care for in our practices, it is time to stop extrapolating and define an evidence-based approach for this population that is based on data from prospective elderly specific clinical trials.

Real-World Treatment Sequencing in Vulnerable Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Data regarding treatment sequence for vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess treatment outcomes in second-line or later chemotherapy for vulnerable patients with mCRC in a real-world setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Vulnerable patients with mCRC who received less intensive treatment ('vulnerable') regimens, i.e. fluoropyrimidines with or without biologics (FP), reduced-dose doublet regimens with or without biologics (Doublet), and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monotherapy (Anti-EGFR), as first-line therapy between June 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients from 15 hospitals were analyzed. The median age was 78 years (range 28-90), and 44 patients (21%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 2. In the entire population, the median time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were 7.6 and 21.4 months, respectively. Following the failure of first-line therapy in 195 patients, 74 (38%), 24 (12%), and 13 (7%) patients received vulnerable regimens, full-dose doublet regimens with or without biologics, and other regimens, respectively, whereas 84 (43%) received best supportive care (BSC). In patients receiving vulnerable regimens as second-line therapy, the median TTF and OS were 4.4 and 13.7 months, respectively, while response rate and disease control rate were 18% and 62%, respectively. In 84 patients who received BSC, the median OS was 3.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-line chemotherapy for vulnerable patients with mCRC showed clinically meaningful outcomes; however, few patients received second-line therapy, and survival among patients who received BSC was dismal.

Management of metastatic colorectal cancer in patients ≥70 years - a single center experience

BACKGROUND

Age-standardized mortality rates for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are highest among elderly patients. In current clinical guidelines, treatment recommendations for this patient population are based on a limited number of clinical trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this monocentric, retrospective analysis we characterized patients aged ≥70 years undergoing systemic therapy for mCRC and overall survival (OS) was investigated.

RESULTS

We included 117 unselected, consecutive mCRC patients aged ≥70 years undergoing systemic therapy for mCRC between February 2009 and July 2022. Median OS was 25.6 months (95% CI: 21.8-29.4). The median age was 78 years (range: 70-90) and 21%, 48%, 26% and 5% had an ECOG performance score of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median number of systemic therapy lines was 2 (range: 1-5). The choice of first-line chemotherapy backbone (doublet/triplet versus mono) did not impact OS (HR: 0.83, p=0.50) or the probability of receiving subsequent therapy (p=0.697). Metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment in the liver, lung, peritoneum and/or other organs were applied in 26 patients (22%) with curative intent. First-line anti-EGFR-based therapy showed a trend towards longer OS compared to anti-VEGF-based therapy or chemotherapy alone in left-sided mCRC (anti-EGFR: 39.3 months versus anti-VEGF: 27.3 months versus chemotherapy alone: 13.8 months, p=0.105). In multivariable analysis, metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment with curative intent (yes versus no, HR: 0.22, p<0.001), the ECOG performance score (2 versus 0, HR: 3.07, p=0.007; 3 versus 0, HR: 3.66, p=0.053) and the presence of liver metastases (yes versus no, HR: 1.79, p=0.049) were independently associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings corroborate front-line monochemotherapy in combination with targeted therapy as the treatment of choice for elderly mCRC patients with palliative treatment intent. Metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment with curative intent are feasible and may improve OS in selected elderly mCRC patients.

Long-Term Progression-Free Survival of a Pre-Treated Patient with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Trifluridine/Tipiracil

Trifluridine/tipiracil is approved for the use in later or last-line setting in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who progressed on standard anti-tumor drugs including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, oxaliplatin, anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR antibodies, or who are not considered candidates for those standard therapies. In this report, we describe a 67-year-old male patient with KRAS-mutated mCRC and metachronous liver and lung metastasis who failed prior 5-FU- and irinotecan-containing regimens, but then showed long-term disease control for 31 months on single-agent trifluridine/tipiracil given as second-line treatment. According to our experience, trifluridine/tipiracil is a feasible and effective treatment option in earlier but not necessarily last-line therapy in mCRC patients who are not considered candidates for doublet or triplet chemotherapy. Besides its efficacy, it is associated with maintained quality of life and a manageable toxicity profile. Considering increasing age of mCRC patients and their wish for maintaining an independent lifestyle, further research on the use of trifluridine/tipiracil in earlier lines of systemic mCRC therapy is warranted.

Fluoropyrimidine-induced hand-foot syndrome and cardiotoxicity: recommendations for the use of the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are an essential part of the majority of systemic regimens in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The use of the oral FP S-1 has been approved by the European Medicines Agency as monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan, with or without bevacizumab, for the treatment of patients with metastatic CRC in whom it is not possible to continue treatment with another FP due to hand-foot syndrome (HFS) or cardiovascular toxicity (CVT). Subsequently, this indication has been included in the 2022 ESMO guidelines for metastatic CRC. Recommendations for use in daily practice are not available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Based on peer-reviewed published data on the use of S-1 in Western patients with metastatic CRC who switched from infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine to S-1 for reasons of HFS or CVT, recommendations for its use were formulated by an international group of medical oncologists with expertise in the treatment of metastatic CRC and a cardio-oncologist.

RESULTS

In patients who experience pain and/or functional impairment due to HFS during treatment with capecitabine or infusional 5-FU, a switch to S-1 is recommended without prior dose reduction of capecitabine/5-FU. S-1 should preferably be initiated at full dose when HFS has decreased to grade ≤1. In patients with cardiac complaints, in whom an association with capecitabine or infusional 5-FU treatment cannot be excluded, capecitabine/5-FU should be discontinued and a switch to S-1 is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations should guide clinicians in daily practice in the treatment of patients with metastatic CRC with FP-containing regimens.

Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial

BACKGROUND

This open-label, multicentre, phase II/III trial assessed the noninferiority of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab vs. fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (control) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive FTD/TPI (35 mg/m² twice daily, days 1-5 and days 8-12, 28-day cycle) plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, days 1 and 15) or control. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The noninferiority margin of the hazard ratio (HR) was set to 1.33.

RESULTS

Overall, 397 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Median OS was 14.8 vs. 18.1 months (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control; HR 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.93; P_{noninferiority} = 0.5920). In patients with a baseline sum of the diameter of target lesions of <60 mm (n = 216, post hoc analyses), the adjusted median OS was similar between groups (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control, 21.4 vs. 20.7 months; HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.55-1.55). Grade ≥3 adverse events (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control) included neutropenia (65.8% vs. 41.6%) and diarrhoea (1.5% vs. 7.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab did not demonstrate noninferiority to fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab as second-line treatment for mCRC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

JapicCTI-173618, jRCTs031180122.

Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab

Regorafenib is a standard salvage line therapy used for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) plus bevacizumab also showed promising efficacy as a salvage line therapy for advanced CRC. However, the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with advanced CRC who have previously received TFTD plus bevacizumab is unclear. We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic data from patients with advanced CRC who received regorafenib after TFTD plus bevacizumab in multiple institutions between April 2017 and June 2020.Thirty-four advanced CRC patients who received regorafenib were analyzed. The median age was 66.5 (range 43-81 years), 11 patients were male, and all had an ECOG performance status(PS) of 0 or 1. Twenty-two patients had left-sided tumors, 18 patients had RAS mutants, and 1 patient had a BRAF V600E mutation. The response rate was 0%, and the disease control rate was 31%. The median progression-free survival was 70 days (95% CI: 56-91), and the overall survival was 233 days (95% CI: 188-324). Treatment was discontinued in 32 patients, and 28 (82%) discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. The major grade 3 and4 toxicities were proteinurea (29%), hypertension (26%), hand-foot syndrome(15%), and platelet decrease (6%). Regorafenib after TFTD plus bevacizumab showed efficacy similar to that of the previous study, and no new adverse events were observed.