Nurses' attitudes toward caring for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Multidimensional attitudes of emergency medicine residents toward older adults

INTRODUCTION

The demands of our rapidly expanding older population strain many emergency departments (EDs), and older patients experience disproportionately high adverse health outcomes. Trainee attitude is key in improving care for older adults. There is negligible knowledge of baseline emergency medicine (EM) resident attitudes regarding elder patients. Awareness of baseline attitudes can serve to better structure training for improved care of older adults. The objective of the study is to identify baseline EM resident attitudes toward older adults using a validated attitude scale and multidimensional analysis.

METHODS

Six EM residencies participated in a voluntary anonymous survey delivered in summer and fall 2009. We used factor analysis using the principal components method and Varimax rotation, to analyze attitude interdependence, translating the 21 survey questions into 6 independent dimensions. We adapted this survey from a validated instrument by the addition of 7 EM-specific questions to measures attitudes relevant to emergency care of elders and the training of EM residents in the geriatric competencies. Scoring was performed on a 5-point Likert scale. We compared factor scores using student t and ANOVA.

RESULTS

173 EM residents participated showing an overall positive attitude toward older adults, with a factor score of 3.79 (3.0 being a neutral score). Attitudes trended to more negative in successive post-graduate year (PGY) levels.

CONCLUSION

EM residents demonstrate an overall positive attitude towards the care of older adults. We noted a longitudinal hardening of attitude in social values, which are more negative in successive PGY-year levels.

HIV knowledge and attitudes among providers in aging: results from a national survey

Within 5 years, half the U.S. HIV-infected population will be over age 50, and providers caring for older adults must deal with this reality. This study assessed attitudes toward people with HIV/AIDS and knowledge of HIV/AIDS among physicians with a geriatrics specialty, and nurses and social workers who specialize in gerontology. A survey mailed in 2008 to a random sample of U.S. providers yielded a 60% response rate. Main outcome measures included: Knowledge of HIV/AIDS, attitudes toward people with HIV/AIDS, and knowledge of issues related to HIV in older adults. General knowledge of HIV/AIDS was good with scores of 89%, 84%, and 81% for physicians, nurses, and social workers, respectively; groups differed significantly (F(2, 483)=18.626, p<0.0005). Attitudes were positive, with a significant main effect of profession on the attitude subscales (F(4, 952)=6.84, p<0.0005). Eighty-three percent of the sample were unaware that dementia due to HIV may be reversible; no significant differences by profession (χ(2)=4.50, p=0.105). The sample had difficulty ranking the four most common risk factors for HIV infection in older adults, with no significant differences among the professions (F(2, 483)=1.22, p=0.296). Only 6% of the sample correctly ranked all four risk factors. Estimates of the percent of U.S. AIDS cases in people over age 50 varied widely; few answered correctly, with no significant differences by professional group (F(2,319)=2.82, p=0.06). These findings highlight the need for further education among providers who specialize in aging.

A systematic review of the knowledge, attitudes and practice of trained nurses towards patients with HIV/AIDS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Background Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is a global health problem. Stigmatization and blame which are associated with the disease have made efforts to control the pandemic challenging. With discoveries of anti-retroviral drugs, HIV/AIDS patients are expected to live longer. Therefore, nurses being frontline workers are expected to nurse them in different clinical settings. Some studies have found that nurses hold discriminatory attitudes when caring for HIV/AIDS patients, have gaps in their knowledge and differing practicesObjective The objective of this review was to synthesize the evidence on the knowledge, attitudes and practice of trained nurses towards HIV/AIDS patients.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Types of participants Studies that included trained nurses, specifically Registered Nurses (RN) and Enrolled nurses (EN).Types of interventions Studies that evaluated knowledge, attitudes and practice of trained nurses towards HIV/AIDS patients.Types of measured outcomes Studies that included outcome measures of knowledge, attitudes or practices of trained nurses towards HIV/AIDS patients.Types of studies Cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, case control studies and descriptive studies were considered for inclusionSearch strategy A three-step search strategy was utilised. Search was limited to English language studies published between January 1990 till December 2010.Assessment of methodological quality The reviewers used the JBI Critical AppraisalChecklists to assess methodological quality.Data extraction Data were extracted using the JBI Data Extraction Form for experimental/observational studies.Data synthesis Meta-analyses was not performed. Findings are presented in a narrative summary.Results Thirty-three studies were included for this systematic review. All studies were descriptive studies. The results showed that the knowledge, attitude and practices of nurses varied. In general studies showed that: nurses' knowledge of HIV/AIDS was satisfactory but knowledge deficits are prevalent in certain areas; nurses also had positive attitudes, but still held fears; nurse showed more prejudice towards HIV/AIDS patients in the high risk groups; practiced of universal precaution was irregular; and nurses also changed their practice behaviours after knowing the patient is HIV positive.Conclusion Knowledge, attitude and practices of nurses varied worldwide. The level of knowledge is satisfactory but gaps in knowledge exist. Nurses have positive attitudes but is affected by the ways which a person acquired HIV/AIDS. Strong stigmatization is still prevalent towards high risk groups. The use of universal precaution also needs to be address. More well established questionnaire should be used to measure practice towards HIV/AIDS patients.Implications for practice Institutions need to: develop strategies to assist nurses to overcome fears, create self-awareness with regards to their attitude; relook into programmes to address knowledge deficits; make trainings available to keep nurses up-to-date; make protective barriers available for nurses readily; put universal precaution policy in place; look into universal precaution education.Implications for research Research should focused on using well established questionnaire to measure nurses' practices; the relationship between knowledge, attitude and practices; factors affecting the use of universal precautions in different settings; comparison between nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices towards HIV/AIDS with other infectious diseases; develop and test education program for nurses.

HIV/AIDS knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceptions of rural nurses in South Africa

AIM

This paper is a report of a study exploring HIV/AIDS-related knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceptions of nurses in the largely black and rural Limpopo Province of South Africa.

BACKGROUND

Studies of HIV/AIDS knowledge, attitudes and practices among healthcare workers in developing countries have shown gaps in knowledge and fear of contagion, coupled with ambivalent attitudes in caring for patients with HIV/AIDS and inconsistent universal precautions adherence.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study of a random sample of primary health care (PHC) (n = 71) and hospital nurses (n = 69) was carried out in 2005, using a questionnaire, focus groups and in-depth interviews.

FINDINGS

Hospital nurses reported a higher frequency of care for patients with HIV/AIDS (P < 0.05), but less HIV/AIDS training when compared to PHC nurses (P < 0.001). HIV/AIDS knowledge was moderately adequate and associated with professional rank, frequency of care and training (P < 0.001). Attitudes towards patients with HIV/AIDS were mainly positive and were statistically significantly correlated with HIV/AIDS knowledge (P < 0.01) and training (P < 0.05). Three out of four nurses reported that they practised universal precautions (76.1%), but fear of occupational HIV transmission and lack of injection safety was found. Seven in 10 nurses reported previous needlestick injuries, but postexposure prophylaxis was not available in all healthcare facilities. Participants reported a higher workload because of HIV/AIDS, lack of training impacting negatively on their work, and stigma and shared confidentiality affecting them emotionally.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for accelerated HIV/AIDS training of rural nurses and for wider implementation of universal precautions and postexposure prophylaxis availability in public health facilities in southern Africa.

How caring for persons with HIV/AIDS affects rural nurses

Prior research findings about caregiving for persons with HIV/AIDS indicate that caregiving impacts nurses in three separate domains: personal self as a nurse in practice; interactions with the nurse's family members, friends, and colleagues; and interactions with persons with HIV/AIDS. However the impact caregiving for persons with HIV/AIDS has on rural nurses has not been extensively explored. A qualitative study of rural registered nurses' experiences of caring for persons with HIV/AIDS was conducted to determine how caregiving affects registered nurses in rural areas. Content analysis was used to analyze rural registered nurses' written comments about their experiences of caring for persons with HIV/AIDS. Themes identified from the nurses' accounts of instances of caregiving were the perceived risk of acquiring the virus, a lack of concern about HIV/AIDS, and a need for ongoing continued education about the care of persons with HIV/AIDS.

AIDS-dedicated nurses: what can be learned from their perceptions and experiences

Throughout the history of the AIDS epidemic, the theoretical and empirical literature have emphasized the stressors related to the care of patients with AIDS and the reluctance of health professionals to provide AIDS care. Since the beginning, however, there have been individuals who dedicated themselves to the care of patients with AIDS. This descriptive, qualitative study explored the perceptions and experiences of nurses who have chosen to work on an AIDS-dedicated unit in a New York City medical center, with regard to both their patients and their own personal and professional responses to caring for patients with AIDS. In addition to presenting the interview data of 12 AIDS-dedicated nurses, included are researcher observations, based on 4 months of participatory observation on an AIDS unit. These findings provide insight into the development of the relationship between nurses and their patients with HIV/AIDS and lessons in supporting and enriching those caregiving relationships.

Adherence to prescribed HIV-1 protease inhibitors in the home setting

The issue of adherence to any therapy prescribed by a health care provider is multidimensional and includes personal challenges that exist in the daily life of any client, as well as the individual practices and attitudes of the health care provider. In addition, since most health is delivered in congregate settings such as the hospital, clinic, or office, it is important to consider those factors that may be present in a client's home that can impede compliant behavior. This article reviews challenges to compliance that should be considered when developing a care plan for clients, focusing on variables that may be present in the home setting.

Compliance/adherence and care management in HIV disease

With the changing perspectives of the HIV epidemic and the introduction of protease inhibitors to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, the issue of compliance has gained considerable interest among health care providers. The idea that clients with HIV disease should succumb to a patriarchal system of medical care has been challenged by AIDS activists since the beginning of the epidemic. The concept that there is only one explanation for "noncompliance" is outdated. The reasons for noncompliance are multifaceted in nature and include psychosocial factors, complex medication and treatment regimens, ethnocultural concerns, and in many instances substance use. Therefore, the notion that there is one intervention to resolve noncompliance is at best archaic. Interventions to enhance compliance include supervised therapy, improving the nurse-client relationship, and patient education, all of which should be combined with ethnocultural interventions. Plans to enhance compliance must incorporate person-specific variables and should be tailored to individualized needs.