The Things that Help, the Things that Get in the Way : Working Together to Improve Outcome Following Acquired Brain Injury

Optimizing our evidence map for cognitive-communication interventions: How it can guide us to better outcomes for adults living with acquired brain injury

BACKGROUND

Speech and language therapists (SLTs) share a collective goal of ensuring that adults with cognitive-communication disorders (CCD) due to acquired brain injuries (ABI) attain their highest possible level of participation and satisfaction in family, community, social, work and academic communications through evidence-based interventions. While there is a considerable evidence base to support SLT cognitive-communication interventions, there are also numerous barriers to its implementation.

AIMS

The first aim is to describe the development of a comprehensive knowledge translation tool that synthesizes evidence-based practice recommendations for SLT cognitive-communication interventions across the care continuum. The second aim is to critically analyse the barriers to implementation of these interventions and to explore how this knowledge translation tool might assist in overcoming these challenges.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

We developed a map of 148 clinical practice recommendations extracted from 129 reviews and guidelines called the Cognitive-Communication Evidence Application for SLTs (CCEAS-Map). The process of developing the CCEAS-Map included: (1) examination of implementation science frameworks to inform knowledge tool creation; (2) search and synthesis of the evidence provided in reviews and guidelines that met specific criteria; (3) development of a framework to critically analyse and categorize the barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of these clinical recommendations; (4) consultation with potential end users of the CCEAS-Map, including 16 expert SLTs and eight persons with lived experience (PWLE), regarding the tool's construction, barriers and facilitators to implementation, and the potential of the CCEAS-Map to address evidence-practice gaps; and (5) refining the CCEAS-Map based on expert input.

MAIN CONTRIBUTION

To our knowledge this is the first synthesis of all available clinical recommendations for SLT cognitive-communication interventions for ABI, across all severities of injury, stages along the continuum of care, and areas of CCD practice. The paper presents a novel approach to analysing knowledge-practice gaps: drawing on implementation science tools, analysing barriers and facilitators, and collaborating with end users in designing a knowledge translation tool.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

The CCEAS-Map provides a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence in a format that can facilitate clinical application of the evidence, provide education for all stakeholders, serve as a basis for CCD pathway development, support researcher-clinician collaboration and encourage advocacy at the system level. As a knowledge translation tool, the CCEAS-Map can promote the availability of SLT services and has the potential to ultimately improve the lives of those with CCD.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject A great deal is known about cognitive-communication deficits incurred after ABI, including their impact on daily functioning, optimal methods for sensitive and ecologically valid assessment, and the efficacy of various speech-language therapy interventions along the care continuum. However, considerable constraints remain that interfere with the application of this evidence to daily SLT practice. A need was identified to develop a knowledge translation tool to help close these evidence-practice gaps. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study describes the development of the CCEAS-Map, a critical synthesis of 129 reviews and guidelines, leading to 148 evidence-based clinical recommendations, which can be used to guide SLT cognitive-communication practice and education, as well as clinical pathway development, and advocacy for systemic changes and other healthcare policy improvements. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The CCEAS-Map is a clinical knowledge translation tool designed to guide cognitive-communication interventions by linking practice recommendations directly to the current evidence. This paper also offers insights into barriers to SLT intervention across the care continuum and strategies for improving implementation of cognitive-communication best practices, to improve the lives of those living with ABI related disabilities.

Finding Goal Focus With People With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Person-Centered Multi-Component Community Connection Program (M-ComConnect)

Background and Objectives: Loss of social connections in the community is a common consequence of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), resulting in reduced well-being and quality of life. M-ComConnect is an individualized multi-component community connection intervention with the key objectives of increasing social activity, developing social relationships, and supporting community participation following severe TBI. As part of the M-ComConnect approach, semi-structured initial interviews were conducted to develop a holistic understanding of each participant and their goal focus for the project. In this paper we describe how clinicians worked with participants to identify a desired community-based social activity in which to participate. Method: Transcripts of initial interviews between participant and clinician were analyzed using the phases of reflexive thematic analysis developed by Braun and Clarke. Participants were ten individuals aged between 24 and 75 with severe TBI. All were living in the community and reported reduced social connections since their TBI. The aim of the analysis was to evaluate the skills and strategies used by clinicians in their interactions with participants to derive goal focus for the program. Results: Thematic analysis of initial interview data revealed three main categories and fourteen sub-categories of clinical strategies. These were: (1) Humanizing (curiosity; demonstrating respect and empathy; providing compliments and affirmations; simple reflections; revealing aspects of self; and humor and laughter), (2) Empowering (emphasizing choice and control; highlighting strengths; identifying roadblocks and reframing to reveal opportunities; and collaborative problem solving), and (3) Focusing (making suggestions; identifying preferences; working with ideas; and negotiating). These strategies aligned with the program's relational approach and supported the core processes of the goal-focussing framework, namely understanding and connecting with you, building a relationship, and working together with you to find focus. Conclusion: The goal-focusing framework and clinical strategies outlined provide guidance for clinicians working with people with TBI in the community and is a promising way to engage clients when focusing on individualized social activity-based goals.

Factors facilitating recovery following severe traumatic brain injury: A qualitative study

Given the significant impact of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), understanding factors influencing recovery is critical to inform prognostication and treatment planning. Previous research has focussed primarily on factors negatively associated with outcome, with less focus on factors facilitating the recovery process. The current qualitative study examined positive factors identified for recovery by individuals who had sustained severe TBI three years earlier. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine participants with TBI and 16 close-others. Participants were asked to identify factors about themselves (or the injured individual), those around them, and the care they received that they felt were positive for recovery. Using reflexive thematic analysis, three themes were identified as positive for recovery after a TBI. Having a support network included social supports such as family and friends, and receiving other funded/non-funded assistance towards improving independence and participation. Being positive and engaged included being able to participate, being positive, using compensatory strategies, and becoming fit, healthy and happy. Getting good care included patients perceiving they had a comprehensive and good quality hospital experience, and access to multidisciplinary outpatient services. A focus on enhancing these positive environmental, personal and service factors in service provision may enhance outcomes following severe TBI.