Sentinel visits in emergency department patients with diabetes mellitus as a warning sign for hyperglycemic emergencies

Predictors of 30-day recurrent emergency department visits for hyperglycemia in patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study's aims were to describe the outcomes of patients with diabetes presenting with their first ED visit for hyperglycemia, and to identify predictors of recurrent ED visits for hyperglycemia.

METHODS

Using linked databases, we conducted a population-based cohort study of adult and pediatric patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes presenting with a first ED visit for hyperglycemia from April 2010 to March 2020 in Ontario, Canada. We determined the proportion of patients with a recurrent ED visit for hyperglycemia within 30 days of the index visit. Using multivariable regression analysis, we examined clinical and socioeconomic predictors for recurrent visits.

RESULTS

There were 779,632 patients with a first ED visit for hyperglycemia. Mean (SD) age was 64.3 (15.2) years; 47.7% were female. 11.0% had a recurrent visit for hyperglycemia within 30 days. Statistically significant predictors of a recurrent visit included: male sex, type 1 diabetes, regions with fewer visible minority groups and with less education or employment, higher hemoglobin A1C, more family physician or internist visits within the past year, being rostered to a family physician, previous ED visits in the past year, ED or hospitalization within the previous 14 days, access to homecare services, and previous hyperglycemia encounters in the past 5 years. Alcoholism and depression or anxiety were positive predictors for the 18-65 age group.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-level study identifies predictors of recurrent ED visits for hyperglycemia, including male sex, type 1 diabetes, regions with fewer visible minority groups and with less education or employment, higher hemoglobin A1C, higher previous healthcare system utilization (ED visits and hospitalization) for hyperglycemia, being rostered to a family physician, and access to homecare services. Knowledge of these predictors may be used to develop targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare system costs.

Emergency Department Management of Uncomplicated Hyperglycemia in Patients without History of Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycemia is a common finding in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Recommendations addressing uncomplicated hyperglycemia in the ED are limited, and the management of those without a prior diagnosis of diabetes presents a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review will discuss the ED evaluation and management of hyperglycemic adult patients without a history of diabetes who do not have evidence of a hyperglycemic crisis, such as diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state.

DISCUSSION

Many adults who present to the ED have risk factors for diabetes and meet American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for diabetes screening. A new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes can be established in the ED by the ADA criteria in patients with a random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) and symptoms of hyperglycemia. The diagnosis should be considered in patients with an elevation in random blood glucose > 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L). Treatment may begin in the ED and varies depending on the presenting severity of hyperglycemia. Treatment options include metformin, long-acting insulin, or deferring for close outpatient management.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency clinician knowledge of the evaluation and management of new-onset hyperglycemia and diabetes is important to prevent long-term complications.

The burden of diabetic emergencies on the resuscitation area of a district-level public hospital in Cape Town

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes and its complications continue to cause a daunting and growing concern on resource-limited environments. There is a paucity of data relating to the care of diabetic emergencies in the emergency centres of entry-level hospitals in Africa. The aim of this study was to describe the burden of diabetic emergencies presenting to the emergency centre of an urban district-level hospital in Cape Town, South Africa.

METHODS

The Khayelitsha Hospital Emergency Centre database was retrospectively analysed for patients presenting with a diabetic emergency within a 24-week randomly selected period. The database was supplemented by a retrospective chart review to include additional variables for participants with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), uncomplicated hyperglycaemia, severe hypoglycaemia and hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state (HHS). Summary statistics are presented of all variables.

RESULTS

The prevalence of all diabetic emergencies was 8.1% (197/2424) (DKA n = 96, 48.7%; uncomplicated hyperglycaemia n = 45, 22.8%; severe hypoglycaemia n = 44, 22.3%; HHS n = 12, 6%). The median age was 48 years, with those presenting with DKA being substantially younger (36 years). A likely precipitant was identified in 175 (88%) patients; infection was the most common precipitant (n = 79, 40.1%). Acute kidney injury occurred in 80 (40.6%) cases. The median length of stay in the resuscitation area was 13 h (IQR 7.2-24) and 101 (51.3%) participants represented with a diabetic- related emergency within six months of the study period. The overall mortality rate was 5% (n = 10).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the high burden of diabetic emergencies on the provision of acute care at a district-level hospital. The high prevalence of diabetic emergencies (8%) consisted of DKA (48.7%), uncomplicated hyperglycaemia (22.8%), severe hypoglycaemia (22.3%), and HHS (6%). The high infection rate (40%) and the high percentage of patients returning with a diabetic emergency (51%) could be indicative of the need for improved community-based diabetic programmes.

Experience of emergency department patients after a visit for hyperglycaemia: implications for communication and factors affecting adherence postdischarge

BACKGROUND

While studies have reported factors affecting adherence to diabetic care plans from a chronic disease perspective, no studies have addressed issues with post-discharge adherence facing patients with diabetes after an emergency department (ED) presentation for hyperglycaemia. This study's objectives were to describe patient perspectives on their experience during and after an ED visit for hyperglycaemia and to identify factors that influence postdischarge adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative description (QD) study of adult patients who had visited a Canadian ED for hyperglycaemia. Consistent with QD, purposive sampling was utilised, seeking diversity across age, gender and diabetes type. Participants took part in semistructured interviews and thematic analysis was used to identify and describe core themes. Frequent team meetings were held to review the analysis and to develop the final list of themes used to recode the data set. Analytic insights were tracked using reflective memos and an audit trail documented all steps and decisions.

RESULTS

22 patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes were interviewed from June to October 2019. Participants identified several factors that impacted their ability to adhere to discharge plans: communication of instructions, psychosocial factors (financial considerations, shame and guilt, stigma and mental health), access to follow-up care and paediatric to adult care transitions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes the patient experience with the communication of discharge instructions, as well as factors affecting adherence post-ED discharge for hyperglycaemia. Our findings suggest four strategies that could improve the patient experience, improve adherence to discharge plans and potentially decrease the frequency of recurrent ED visits for hyperglycaemia.

Seeking Care for Hyperglycemia in the Emergency Department: Through the Eyes of the Patient

Health care systems often provide a range of options of care for patients with illnesses who do not require hospital admission. For individuals with diabetes, these options may include primary care providers, specialized diabetes clinics, and urgent care and walk-in clinics. We explored the reasons why patients choose the Emergency Department over other health care settings when seeking care for hyperglycemia.

Do Adult Patients With Type 1 or 2 Diabetes Who Present to the Emergency Department With Hyperglycemia Have Improved Outcomes if They Have Access to Specialized Diabetes Care?

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have examined the effect of specialized care on patients with diabetes who present to the emergency department (ED) visits for acute hyperglycemia. The objective of this study was to characterize ED patients presenting with hyperglycemia and compare the 30-day outcomes of those followed by specialized diabetes clinics with those not followed. We hypothesized that patients followed by specialized clinics would have improved clinical outcomes compared with those who had no specialized follow up.

METHODS

We conducted this single-centre retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with an ED visit for hyperglycemia over 1 year (January to December 2014). Data from ED visits were linked to specialized diabetes clinic records, which contained diabetes-specific clinical data not available in ED visit records. Descriptive statistics were summarized and comparisons between groups were performed, when appropriate.

RESULTS

There were 456 patients (55.0% men; mean age, 47.7 years; 46.3% with type 1 diabetes) with 250 followed by the specialized diabetes clinics. The 206 patients who were not followed by the diabetes clinics (45%) were more likely to have a recurrent hyperglycemia ED visit (32.5% vs 9.6%, p<0.001) and to require hospitalization for hyperglycemia (14.1% vs 5.2%, p=0.001) within 30 days of initial presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients followed by specialized diabetes clinics had fewer recurrent ED visits and hospital admissions for hyperglycemia at 30 days compared with those not followed, suggesting that greater continuity of care between endocrinology and emergency medicine may help reduce these adverse outcomes for patients with diabetes.

Just the Facts: Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis in the emergency department

A 21-year-old male with known type 1 diabetes mellitus presented to the emergency department (ED) with two days of vomiting, polyuria, and polydipsia after several days of viral upper respiratory tract infection symptoms. Since his symptom onset, his home capillary blood glucose readings have been higher than usual. On the day of presentation, his glucometer read “high,” and he could not tolerate oral fluids. On examination, his pulse was 110 beats/minute, and his respiratory rate was 24 breaths/minute. He was afebrile, and the remaining vital signs were normal. Other than dry mucous membranes, his cardiopulmonary, abdominal, and neurologic exams were unremarkable. Venous blood gas demonstrated a pH of 7.25 mm Hg, pCO2 of 31 mm Hg, HCO3 of 13 mm Hg, anion gap of 18 mmol/L, and laboratory blood glucose of 40 mmol/L, as well as serum ketones measuring “large.”

Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Adult and Pediatric Patients With Hyperglycemia Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review

Hyperglycemia is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, often resulting in adverse outcomes. This review aimed to identify predictors of adverse outcomes, such as repeated hospital visits, hospitalization or death, in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hyperglycemia. Electronic searches of Medline and EMBASE were conducted for studies in English of patients presenting to the ED with hyperglycemia. Both adult and pediatric populations were included, with and without diabetes. Two reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts for relevance. If consensus was not reached, full-length manuscripts were reviewed. For discrepancies, a third reviewer was consulted. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Study- and patient-specific data were extracted and presented descriptively. Eight observational studies were reviewed; they included a total of 96,970 patients. Predictors of adverse outcomes included age, lowest income quintile, urban dwellers, presence of comorbidities, coexisting hyperlactatemia, having a family physician, elevated serum creatinine level, diabetes managed with insulin, sentinel visit for hyperglycemia in the past month, and high blood glucose level measured in the ED. Conflicting evidence was found for whether known history of diabetes was associated with risk. Factors associated with favourable outcomes included systolic blood pressure of 90 to 150 mmHg and tachycardia. This systematic review found 12 factors associated with adverse outcomes, and 2 factors associated with more favourable outcomes in patients presenting to the ED with hyperglycemia. These factors should be considered for easier identification of patients at higher risk for adverse outcomes to guide management and follow up.