Choosing Wisely Canada's emergency medicine recommendations: Time for a revision

Use of the Canadian CT head rule for patients on anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapy presenting with mild traumatic brain injury: prospective observational study

Background and importance

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a frequent presentation in Emergency Department (ED). There are standardised guidelines, the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR), for CT scan in mTBI that rule out patients on either anticoagulant or anti-platelet therapy. All patients with these therapies undergo a CT scan irrespectively of other consideration.

Objective

To determine whether standard guidelines could be applied to patients on anticoagulants or anti-platelet drugs.

Design, settings, and participants

1,015 patients with mTBI and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 15 were prospectively recruited, 509 either on anticoagulant or anti-platelet therapy and 506 on neither. All patients on neither therapy underwent CT scan following guidelines. All patients with mTBI on either therapy underwent CT scan irrespective of the guidelines.

Outcome measure and analysis

Primary endpoint was the incidence of post-traumatic intracranial bleeding in patients either on anticoagulants or anti-platelet drugs and in patients who were not on these therapies. Bayesian statistical analysis with calculation of Confidence Intervals (CI) was then performed.

Main results

Sixty scans were positive for bleeding: 59 patients fulfilled the criteria and 1 did not. Amongst patients with haemorrhage, 24 were on either therapy and only one did not meet the guidelines but in this patient the CT scan was performed before 2 h from the mTBI. Patients on either therapy did not have higher bleeding rates than patients on neither. There were higher bleeding rates in patients on anti-platelet therapy who met the guidelines vs. patients who did not. These rates overlapped with patients on neither therapy, meeting CCHR.

Conclusion

The CCHR might be used for mTBI patients on either therapy. Anticoagulants and anti-platelet drugs should not be considered a risk factor for patients with mTBI and a GCS of 15. Multicentric studies are needed to confirm this result.

Choosing Wisely® in Japanese Emergency Medicine: Nine Recommendations to Improve The Value of Health Care

BACKGROUND

The overuse of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities has become an issue in the field of emergency medicine. The health care system of Japan aims to provide the most appropriate quality and quantity of care at the right price, while focusing on patient value. The Choosing Wisely® campaign was launched in Japan and other countries.

OBJECTIVE

In this article, recommendations were discussed to improve the field of emergency medicine based on the state of the Japanese health care system.

METHODS

The modified Delphi method, a consensus-building method, was used in this study. The final recommendations were developed by a working group of 20 medical professionals, students, and patients, consisting of members of the emergency physician electronic mailing list.

RESULTS

From the 80 candidates recommended and excessive actions gathered, nine recommendations were formulated after two Delphi rounds. The recommendations included the suppression of excessive behavior and the implementation of appropriate medical treatment, like rapid pain relief and the application of ultrasonography during central venous catheter placement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study formulated recommendations to improve the field of Japanese emergency medicine, based on the feedback of patients and health care professionals. The nine recommendations will be helpful for all people involved in emergency care in Japan because they have the potential to prevent the overuse of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, while maintaining the appropriate quality of patient care.

Antibiotic prescribing and outcomes for patients with uncomplicated purulent skin and soft tissue infections in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines suggest adjuvant antibiotics after incision and drainage (I&D) of small, uncomplicated abscesses may improve patient outcomes, minimize pain, and prevent recurrence. The objective was to explore antibiotic prescribing at ED discharge and describe patient outcomes.

METHODS

This was a health records review of adult patients (≥ 18 years) discharged from an academic hospital ED (annual census 65,000) over a 2-year period with diagnosis of an uncomplicated skin abscess. Outcomes included any unplanned return ED visits within 30 days, repeat I&D, and escalation to intravenous (IV) antibiotics.

RESULTS

Of 389 ED visits, 85.6% patients underwent I&D, of which 62.2% were prescribed antibiotics at discharge. Of these patients, 36.7% received guideline recommended antibiotics (TMP-SMX or clindamycin). Of all patients who underwent I&D, 13.2% had an unplanned return ED visit within 30 days, 6.9% required repeat I&D, and 0.6% patients were escalated to IV antibiotics. Patients treated with cefalexin were more likely to have an unplanned return ED visit within 30 days (20.0 vs 5.3%; Δ14.7, 95% CI 4.6-24.4), and were more likely to have a repeat I&D within 30 days (13.7 vs 0%; Δ13.7, 95% CI 6.4-22.0), compared to patients prescribed guideline recommended antibiotics. Treatment with guideline recommended antibiotics reduced treatment failure significantly in MRSA positive patients (0.0 vs 44.4%; Δ44.4, 95% CI 13.4-73.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotics were prescribed for most abscesses that underwent I&D. Less than half of the patients received antibiotics that were guideline recommended. Compared to those who received cefalexin, patients prescribed TMP-SMX or clindamycin had fewer return ED visits and were less likely to have a repeat I&D within 30 days. However, adjuvant antibiotic use did not significantly improve outcomes overall, with most patients not requiring a change in management irrespective of antibiotic use.