1
|
Melhado TV, Schneegans S, Rochat A, Kawasaki K, Finley EP, Wheeler D, Allison WE. Utilizing PRISM and RE-AIM to implement and evaluate the Rural Telementoring Training Center (RTTC) for health care workforce development in rural communities. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1219308. [PMID: 37927442 PMCID: PMC10620924 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1219308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Amid rural health worker shortages and hospital closures, it is imperative to build and maintain the local workforce. Telementoring (TM) or technology-enabled mentoring, is a tool for improving health care quality and access by increasing workforce capacity and support. The national Rural Telementoring Training Center (RTTC) was developed to compile and disseminate TM best practices by delivering free training, tools, and technical assistance to support the implementation, sustainability, and evaluation of new and current TM programs for rural health workers. This paper details how the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) was used to understand the context that shaped implementation as well as how Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) was concurrently applied to frame outcomes. Methods The RTTC has three implementation strategies: outreach, training and technical assistance (TTA), and a Quality Measure Toolkit. Ongoing periodic reflections with the RTTC team, informed by PRISM, were collected, as were RE-AIM outcomes. Central to this design was the continuous review of incoming data in team meetings to inform programmatic changes by identifying challenges and applying modifications to strategies in real time. Results Major implementation changes discussed during reflections included providing timely and relevant messaging through various platforms, streamlining and customizing a TTA approach, and offering different options for accessing the Toolkit. The outreach strategy resulted in high Reach across the US, with over 300 organizations contacted. The effectiveness of the RTTC was demonstrated by counts of people engaging with outreach (ex. over 8,300 impressions on LinkedIn), the website (over 6,400 views), and e-bursts (33% open rate). Moreover, there were 32 TTA requests and 70 people accessing the Toolkit. Adoption was demonstrated by 27 people participating in TTA and 14 individuals utilizing the Toolkit. Discussion The integration of PRISM and RE-AIM frameworks promoted a holistic implementation and evaluation plan. Using PRISM, the RTTC team was able to reflect on the implementation strategies through the lens of contextual factors and make rapid programmatic changes within team meetings. That process resulted in outcomes framed by RE-AIM. The integration of two frameworks in tandem provided an adaptive and comprehensive approach to implementing a large-scale, national program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha V. Melhado
- Center for Health Policy, Division of Academic Innovation, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | - Suyen Schneegans
- Center for Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Andrea Rochat
- Center for Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Keito Kawasaki
- Center for Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Erin P. Finley
- Center for Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Denna Wheeler
- Center for Rural Health, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States
| | - Waridibo E. Allison
- Center for Health Policy, Division of Academic Innovation, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Freel SA, Snyder DC, Bastarache K, Jones CT, Marchant MB, Rowley LA, Sonstein SA, Lipworth KM, Landis SP. Now is the time to fix the clinical research workforce crisis. Clin Trials 2023; 20:457-462. [PMID: 37264897 PMCID: PMC10504806 DOI: 10.1177/17407745231177885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
The clinical and translational research enterprise is recognized by many as the "evidence generation system." While there have been several calls to revolutionize this enterprise to more effectively deliver the fruits of biomedical science to patients and society, significant issues across the clinical research workforce are pervasive. Perhaps the most visible sign is the widening gap between supply and demand for competent staff. Underpinning this, is a perfect storm of complex issues. Now reaching crisis point, this problem is far bigger than a staffing issue and ultimately jeopardizes the "engine" of drug and device development. With the current perilous state of the workforce, proposed enterprise fixes are likely to languish far out of reach, given that even "business as usual" is under threat. In fact, a glaring disconnect is evident between the visionary discourse on how to revolutionize the clinical research enterprise and the sober recognition that operationalization of any such vision rests on the shoulders of a workforce that's in dire straits. In this article, we provide a brief forensic analysis of the workforce problem and an initial indication of where solutions may lie.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Freel
- Duke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Clinical Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Denise C Snyder
- Duke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Clinical Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kara Bastarache
- Association of Clinical Research Professionals, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Carolynn Thomas Jones
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark B Marchant
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Laura A Rowley
- North Carolina Biotechnology Center, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Stephen A Sonstein
- Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s and Harvard, Cambridge MA, USA
| | - Karen M Lipworth
- Association of Clinical Research Professionals, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Susan P Landis
- Association of Clinical Research Professionals, Alexandria, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Augustine EF, Steele SJ, McIntosh S, Sugarwala L, White RJ, Yousefi-Nooraie R, Zand MS, Ossip DJ. Utilizing the Un-Meeting model to advance innovative translational and team science. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e176. [PMID: 37745928 PMCID: PMC10514683 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in translational science require innovative solutions, and engagement of productive transdisciplinary teams play a critical role. While various forms of scientific meetings have long provided venues for sharing scientific findings and generating new collaborations, many conferences lack opportunities for active discussions. We describe the use of an Un-Meeting to foster innovative translational science teams through engaged discussions across multidisciplinary groups addressing a shared theme. The Un-Meeting was delivered by the University of Rochester Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, the national coordinating center for the National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program. This pilot CTSA program Un-Meeting focused on engaging translational scientists, policy-makers, community members, advocates, and public health professionals to address the opioid crisis. The participant-driven format leveraged lightning talks, attendee-led idea generation, and extensive breakout discussions to foster multidisciplinary networking. Results indicated participation by a broad set of attendees and a high level of networking during the meeting. These results, coupled with the growth of the Un-Meeting across the CTSA Consortium, provide practices and models to potentially advance team and translational science. While future work will further assess the impact of Un-Meetings, this format presents a promising approach to enhance translational science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika F. Augustine
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Award Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Scott J. Steele
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Award Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Currently with the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Scott McIntosh
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Award Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Laura Sugarwala
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Award Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Robert J. White
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Award Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Reza Yousefi-Nooraie
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Award Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Martin S. Zand
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Award Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine – Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Deborah J. Ossip
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Award Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wolf AV, Hedrick KN, Begerowski SR, Wiper DW, Carter DR, Shuffler ML. Making Every Meeting Count: A Qualitative Investigation of Multiteam Meeting Events and Their Role in Supporting Coordinated Cancer Care Delivery. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e53-e66. [PMID: 36356278 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This research considers how cross-disciplinary cancer care meetings can facilitate coordination within the multiteam systems (MTSs) that provide inpatient hospital care. We conducted a series of interviews and observations with members of a single cancer care MTS to address the following research questions: (1) what are the key characteristics of MTS cancer care meetings (with regard to composition, focus, and structure)? and (2) how is cross-team coordination acknowledged and addressed during these meetings? METHODS In this single-site case study of a MTS operating to provide gynecologic oncology care within a teaching hospital, two types of meetings, called rounds and huddles, were held consistently. We used qualitative methods, including interviews with health care professional subject matter experts and 30 hours of observations of cancer care meetings, and analyzed the data in three stages of qualitative coding. RESULTS Our analyses resulted in a thematic framework detailing key processes, and subprocesses, identified as central to the activities of observed cancer care meetings. Key processes include information sharing, gaining clarity, strategizing, and pedagogy. Discussions and explanations of this framework showcase the ways in which MTS meetings can bolster cross-team coordination and facilitate MTS activities. CONCLUSION Inpatient cancer care meetings provide opportunities to facilitate MTS coordination in several ways, yet doing so does not come without challenges. Considering these results together with insights from meeting science and MTS research, this article concludes by putting forward practical recommendations for leveraging opportunities and overcoming challenges to use cancer care meetings as tools to support cross-team coordination.
Collapse
|
5
|
Yousefi Nooraie R, White RJ, Steele S, Augustine EF, Ossip DJ, Zand MS. Un-Meetings as tools for translational idea generation: A semantic content analysis of an Opioid Crisis Un-Meeting. J Clin Transl Sci 2022; 6:e124. [PMID: 36590361 PMCID: PMC9794961 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Team development and idea generation are key intertwined steps in translational science that need a framework to accommodate unstructured, participatory interactions. To this end, we introduced Un-Meetings to the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program, innovative events that facilitate cross-disciplinary idea generation and informal discussions between translational scientists, policy makers, community members, advocates, and public health professionals. Here we describe a mixed methods study to characterize the conceptual diversity and clusterization of ideas generated through an Opioid Crisis Un-Meeting. Methods An Un-Meeting targeting translation science approaches to the opioid crisis were hosted at the University of Rochester Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC). We used semantic analysis and conceptual mapping of keywords to analyze how attendee-led idea generation sessions identified topics for breakout discussions. Results One hundred and two individuals from 40 institutions proposed 150 unique ideas that were grouped into 23 breakout sessions. Network analysis showed that diverse pools of experts were bridged by topics addressing the complexities of the opioid crisis. Two clusters emerged: (1) systems, contexts, and community engagement, and (2) technologies, innovations, and treatment advancements. Conclusions The cross-disciplinary nature of topic areas that bridge across thematic communities provide opportunities for CTSA programs to engage and support development of diverse translational teams. Potential opportunities for team building include technological advancements of opioid prevention, treatment, surveillance, systems approaches, and studies focusing on special populations and health disparities. The analysis method here may be useful in identifying naturally emerging teams of experts and community gaps when addressing large problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Yousefi Nooraie
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Robert J. White
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Scott Steele
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Deborah J. Ossip
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Martin S. Zand
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), Clinical and Translational Science Program National Coordinating Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Knapke JM, Jenkerson M, Tsao P, Freel S, Fritter J, Helm SL, Jester P, Kolb HR, Mendell A, Petty M, Jones CT. Academic medical center clinical research professional workforce: Part 2 - Issues in staff onboarding and professional development. J Clin Transl Sci 2022; 6:e81. [PMID: 35949655 PMCID: PMC9305080 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Defining key barriers to the development of a well-trained clinical research professional (CRP) workforce is an essential first step in identifying solutions for successful CRP onboarding, training, and competency development, which will enhance quality across the clinical and translational research enterprise. This study aimed to summarize barriers and best practices at academic medical centers related to effective CRP onboarding, training, professional development, identify challenges with the assessment of and mentoring for CRP competency growth, and describe opportunities to improve training and professionalization for the CRP career pathway. Materials/Methods Qualitative data from a series of Un-Meeting breakout sessions and open-text survey questions were analyzed to explore the complex issues involved when developing high-quality onboarding and continuing education opportunities for CRPs at academic medical centers. Results Results suggest there are several barriers to training the CRP workforce, including balancing foundational onboarding with role-based training, managing logistical challenges and institutional contexts, identifying/enlisting institutional champions, assessing competency, and providing high-quality mentorship. Several of these themes are interrelated. Two universal threads present throughout all themes are the need for effective communication and the need to improve professionalization of the CRP career pathway. Conclusion Few institutions have solved all the issues related to training a competent and adaptable CRP workforce, although some have addressed one or more. We applied a socio-technical lens to illustrate our findings and the need for NCATS-funded academic medical centers to work collaboratively within and across institutions to overcome training barriers and support a vital, well-qualified workforce and present several exemplars from the field to help attain this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline M. Knapke
- University of Cincinnati, Center for Clinical & Translational Science & Training, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Michelle Jenkerson
- Washington University – St. Louis, Center for Clinical Studies, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Peg Tsao
- Stanford University, Spectrum, School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Stephanie Freel
- Duke University, School of Medicine, Duke Office of Clinical Research, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jessica Fritter
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Clinical Research Services, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University, College of Nursing, Master of Clinical Research Program, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Shirley L. Helm
- Virginia Commonwealth University, C. Kenneth and Dianne Wright Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Penelope Jester
- The Ohio State University, College of Nursing, Master of Clinical Research Program, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - H Robert Kolb
- University of Florida, Clinical Translational Science Institute - Workforce Directorate, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Angela Mendell
- University of Cincinnati, Center for Clinical & Translational Science & Training, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Megan Petty
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Carolynn T. Jones
- The Ohio State University, College of Nursing, Master of Clinical Research Program, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University, Center for Clinical Translational Research, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Knapke JM, Snyder DC, Carter K, Fitz-Gerald MB, Fritter J, Kolb HR, Marchant M, Mendell A, Petty M, Pullum C, Jones CT. Issues for recruitment and retention of clinical research professionals at academic medical centers: Part 1 - collaborative conversations Un-Meeting findings. J Clin Transl Sci 2022; 6:e80. [PMID: 35949656 PMCID: PMC9305083 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Identification of evidence-based factors related to status of the clinical research professional (CRP) workforce at academic medical centers (AMCs) will provide context for National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) policy considerations and guidance. The objective of this study is to explore barriers and opportunities related to the recruitment and retention of the CRP workforce. Materials and Methods Qualitative data from a series of Un-Meeting breakout sessions and open-text survey questions were analyzed to explore barriers and recommendations for improving AMC CRP recruitment, retention and diversity. Results While certain institutions have established competency-based frameworks for job descriptions, standardization remains generally lacking across CTSAs. AMCs report substantial increases in unfilled CRP positions leading to operational instability. Data confirmed an urgent need for closing gaps in CRP workforce at AMCs, especially for attracting, training, retaining, and diversifying qualified personnel. Improved collaboration with human resource departments, engagement with principal investigators, and overcoming both organizational and resource challenges were suggested strategies, as well as development of outreach to universities, community colleges, and high schools raising awareness of CRP career pathways. Discussion Based on input from 130 CRP leaders at 35 CTSAs, four National Institute of General Medical Sciences' Institutional Development Award (IDeA) program sites, along with industry and government representatives, we identified several barriers to successful recruitment and retention of a highly trained and diverse CRP workforce. Results, including securing institutional support, champions, standardizing and adopting proven national models, improving local institutional policies to facilitate CRP hiring and job progression point to potential solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline M. Knapke
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Denise C. Snyder
- School of Medicine, Office of Clinical Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Karen Carter
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Meredith B. Fitz-Gerald
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jessica Fritter
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - H. Robert Kolb
- Clinical Translational Science Institute Workforce Directorate, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mark Marchant
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Angela Mendell
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Megan Petty
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Cherese Pullum
- Research Integration Hub, Seattle Children’s Hospital University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Carolynn T. Jones
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|