The 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II as an outcome measure for treatment of common mental disorders

A study of disability and socio-economic impact of mental morbidities from the state of Madhya Pradesh, India

Background

Disability associated with mental illness has a disproportionate impact on the work, social, and family responsibilities of an individual toward society. The evidence for disability in mental illnesses would help the clinician, caregivers, policymakers, and various stakeholders to come up with sustainable solutions not only to help fill the existing gaps in care but also to develop new avenues as per the specific needs of the population of Madhya Pradesh (MP).

Aim

To estimate the burden of disability related to mental illnesses in the state of MP.

Materials and Methods

A multi-site cross-sectional study was conducted in 2015-16 as part of National Mental Health Survey among adults above 18 years of age. Samples were selected using multi-stage, stratified, random cluster sampling based on probability proportionate to size. Six tehsils with one urban metro out of four districts from a total of 50 districts were selected in the state of MP. The Sheehan Disability Scale and socio-economic impact of illness (from selected questions from WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0) were used to assess mental morbidity and the subjective reporting of disability.

Results

The weighted prevalence of disability (n = 1011) was found as 10.2%, 13.1%, and 13.9%, respectively, in work/school, social life, and family/home domains. The weighted prevalence of moderate to extreme disability in the same domains was, respectively, 5.1%, 6.7%, and 7.3%. The presence of common mental disorders (CMDs) increases the odds of self-reported disability in work [odds ratio (OR) 2.48, 95% CI 1.35 to 4.59], social life (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.50 to 5.07), and family domains (OR 3.03, 95% CI1.62 to 5.74). When combined with common mental disorders, tobacco use disorder further escalates the odds of self-reported disability in all three domains [OR 7.10, confidence interval (CI) 3.15 to 16.37; 4.93, CI 2.19 to 11.28; and 7.10, CI 2.78 to 19.25]. Currently, non-working persons had a higher disability in social life and family life domains (P = 0.003 and P = 0.021), respectively.

Conclusion

We report a substantial magnitude of disability in social, work, and family life domains. Participants having CMDs, female gender, and those non-working had more disabilities and would require targeted interventions.

A One-Year Follow Up Study on Disability in Mental Health Nursing Practice

Disability is common in patients with mental disorders, and therapeutic approaches should promote functional recovery to achieve the highest quality of life. This study reports changes in WHODAS 2.0 scores at 1 year of follow-up among patients receiving care from a single mental-health nurse in a community setting in Spain and compare these changes by diagnosis (SMI vs. CMI). Baseline and 1-year follow-up scores were compared. For all participants, we collected sociodemographic information, clinical diagnosis, and disability scores according to WHODAS 2.0. Participating patients received the usual, non-manualized nursing intervention. Our sample comprised 133 patients, 75 of whom were assessed after 1 year. All patients had improved WHODAS 2.0 scores (difference of 9.20 ± 2.42; p < .001) in all domains except those domains related to work ("Life activities") and relationships ("Getting along"). Furthermore, almost half of the patients studied were no longer undergoing treatment with the nurse at 1-year follow-up.

Comparison of disability between common mental disorders and severe mental disorders using WHODAS 2.0

INTRODUCTION

Mental disorders are among the leading causes of disability worldwide. Despite the fact that severe mental disorders (SMD) are associated with high disability, the impact of common mental disorders (CMD) is not negligible. In this work, we compare the disability measured with the WHODAS 2.0 scale of both diagnostic groups at the Mental Health Nurse facility.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sociodemographic data, clinical diagnosis and disability scores were collected, using the WHODAS 2.0 scale, of the patients attended by the Mental Health specialist nurse at the Infanta Elena de Valdemoro Hospital (Madrid) and disability was compared in patients with SMD and CMD, using the Student t test.

RESULTS

Our study sample consisted of 133 patients. Patients with CMD showed greater disability compared to patients with SMD. It was observed that the disability associated with CMD is higher, compared to SMD, this difference being significant for the domain of work (p < 0.001) and participation in society (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study we showed that the level of disability associated with CMD was higher in certain areas compared to SMD, this difference was of special relevance for the «Work» and «Participation» domains. This may serve to adapt the interventions aimed at these people and improve their quality of life.

Assessing Functioning across Common Mental Disorders in Psychiatric Emergency Patients: Results from the WHODAS-2

OBJECTIVE

Assessing global functioning in psychiatric emergency settings is important for clinicians to estimate severity of mental disorders, devise a treatment plan, and assess the evolution of their patients' progression over time. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS-2) measures psychological, social, and professional functioning and is recommended as a standardized instrument of choice for use in psychiatric settings. Yet, studies investigating disability profiles of mental disorders using the WHODAS-2 are scarce, and psychometric properties have not been evaluated in a psychiatric emergency context. We describe and compare WHODAS-2 (12-item version) scores across mental disorders (anxiety, mood, psychotic, personality, and substance abuse) in adults admitted to psychiatric emergency.

METHODS

Data from the Signature Bank were used. Participants admitted to psychiatric emergency completed the WHODAS-2 at admission (n = 1,125). Mental disorders were evaluated by psychiatrists, and WHODAS-2 scores were compared across groups. Psychometric properties were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

RESULTS

Higher mean WHODAS-2 scores were reported by those with anxiety, mood, and personality disorders (P < 0.001) compared to other psychopathologies. The measure showed good internal consistency (global score α = 0.88; domain subscores α = 0.59 to 0.85) and acceptable goodness of fit indices in CFA confirming the original structure of WHODAS-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this large-scale study could assist clinicians in interpreting WHODAS-2 scores in psychiatric populations and provide a more detailed portrait of disability profiles associated with different clinical diagnoses.

Comparison of disability between common mental disorders and severe mental disorders using WHODAS 2.0

INTRODUCTION

Mental disorders are among the leading causes of disability worldwide. Despite the fact that severe mental disorders (SMD) are associated with high disability, the impact of common mental disorders (CMD) is not negligible. In this work, we compare the disability measured with the WHODAS 2.0 scale of both diagnostic groups at the Mental Health Nurse facility.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sociodemographic data, clinical diagnosis and disability scores were collected, using the WHODAS 2.0 scale, of the patients attended by the Mental Health specialist nurse at the Infanta Elena de Valdemoro Hospital (Madrid) and disability was compared in patients with SMD and CMD, using the Student t test.

RESULTS

Our study sample consisted of 133 patients. Patients with CMD showed greater disability compared to patients with SMD. It was observed that the disability associated with CMD is higher, compared to SMD, this difference being significant for the domain of work (p<0.001) and participation in society (p=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study we showed that the level of disability associated with CMD was higher in certain areas compared to SMD, this difference was of special relevance for the «Work» and «Participation» domains. This may serve to adapt the interventions aimed at these people and improve their quality of life.

Partnerships in Research to Implement and Disseminate Sustainable and Scalable Evidence-Based Practices (PRIDE) in Mozambique

BACKGROUND

Mental health conditions impose a major burden worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where health specialists are scarce. A challenge to closing LMICs' mental health treatment gap is determining the most cost-effective task-shifting pathway for delivering mental health services using evidence-based interventions (EBIs). This article discusses the protocol for the first study implementing comprehensive mental health services in LMICs.

METHODS

In partnership with the Mozambican Ministry of Health, this cluster-randomized, hybrid implementation effectiveness type-2 trial will evaluate implementation, patient, and service outcomes of three task-shifting delivery pathways in 20 Mozambican districts (population 4.7 million). In pathway 1 (usual care), community health workers (CHWs) and primary care providers (PCPs) refer patients to district-level mental health clinics. In pathway 2 (screen, refer, and treat), CHWs screen and refer patients to PCPs for behavioral and pharmacological EBIs in community clinics. In pathway 3 (community mental health stepped care), CHWs screen patients and deliver behavioral EBIs in the community and refer medication management cases to PCPs in clinics. Mixed-methods process evaluation will be used to examine factors affecting pathway implementation, adoption, and sustainability. Clinical activities will occur without research team support. Ministry of Health personnel will coordinate training and supervision.

RESULTS

The most cost-effective pathway will be scaled up in all districts for 12 months.

NEXT STEPS

This novel study integrating comprehensive mental health services into primary care will inform a toolkit to help the Mozambican Ministry of Health scale up the most cost-effective pathway for mental health services and can be a template for other LMICs.

Relationship between neighbourhood cohesion and disability: findings from SWADES population-based survey, Kerala, India

Background: The burden of disability on individuals and society is enormous in India, and informal care systems try to reduce this burden. This study investigated the association between neighbourhood cohesion and disability in a community-based population in Kerala, India. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have examined this association in India.   Methods: A cross-sectional household survey was conducted with 997 participants aged 30 years and above, in Kerala. Neighbourhood cohesion was assessed by three scales: trust, community participation, and perceived safety. Functional ability was measured by WHODAS 2.0. Explanatory covariates included chronic disease conditions, age, gender, education, income, and mental health conditions. Results: Of 997 participants (37% male; mean age, 53.9 [range, 30-90] years), the majority were married or cohabiting. Univariate analysis showed functional ability to be positively associated with most demographic and health characteristics. However, after adjustment, only social cohesion, age, income, education, chronic diseases and mental health conditions remained significant. Mediation analysis showed the effect of personal and health characteristics on functional ability as mediated by social cohesion. Conclusion: Social cohesion is an important moderator of functional ability. Interventions targeting the creation of stronger ties among neighbours and a sense of belonging should be scaled-up and evaluated in future research.

Diagnostic consequences of a new category of anxious depression and a reduced duration requirement for anxiety symptoms in the ICD-11 PHC

BACKGROUND

A new diagnosis of anxious depression (AD), characterized by both depressive and anxious symptoms at case level, has been proposed for the classification of mental disorders for primary care for ICD-11 (ICD-11 PHC). The ICD-11 PHC proposes a duration requirement for anxiety symptoms of 2 weeks, in line with the requirement for depressive symptoms. This study examined diagnostic assignment under ICD-11 PHC as compared to the previous classification, the ICD-10 PHC, and the relationship of anxiety duration to disability and suicidal ideation.

METHODS

Primary care physicians in five countries referred patients based on either perceived psychological distress or distressing somatic symptoms to a research assistant who administered a computer-guided diagnostic interview. Complete data were obtained for 2279 participants.

RESULTS

Under ICD-11 PHC 47.7% participants received a diagnosis of AD and had greater disability than other diagnostic groups. Under ICD-10 PHC, in addition to meeting requirements for depressive episode, most of these patients met requirements for either generalized anxiety disorder (41.5%) or mixed anxiety and depressive disorder (45.4%). One third of individuals diagnosed with AD had anxiety durations between 2 weeks and 3 months and presented as much disability and suicidal ideation as individuals with longer anxiety durations.

LIMITATIONS

The study was not designed to establish prevalence of these conditions.

CONCLUSION

The proposed ICD-11 PHC encourages early identification and management of significant anxiety symptoms in primary care, particularly when these co-occur with depression. This study provides support for the clinical relevance of these symptoms and the importance of early identification.