dextrose infusion: an anabolic strategy to minimise the catabolic response to surgery while maintaining normoglycaemia in diabetes mellitus type 2 patients

Endogenous Glucose Production in Critical Illness

Regulation of endogenous glucose production (EGP) by hormonal, neuronal, and metabolic signaling pathways contributes to the maintenance of euglycemia under normal physiologic conditions. EGP is defined by the generation of glucose from substrates through glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis, usually in fasted states, for local and systemic use. Abnormal increases in EGP are noted in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, and elevated EGP may also impact the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and congestive heart failure. In this narrative review, we performed a literature search in PubMed to identify recently published English language articles characterizing EGP in critical illness. Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies demonstrates that critical illness can disrupt EGP through multiple mechanisms including increased systemic inflammation, counterregulatory hormone and catecholamine release, alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, insulin resistance, lactic acidosis, and iatrogenic insults such as vasopressors and glucocorticoids administered as part of clinical care. EGP contributes to hyperglycemia in critical illness when abnormally elevated and to hypoglycemia when abnormally depressed, each of which has been independently associated with increased mortality. Increased EGP may also promote protein catabolism that could worsen critical illness myopathy and impede recovery. Better understanding of the mechanisms and factors contributing to dysregulated EGP in critical illness may help in the development of therapeutic strategies that promote euglycemia, reduce intensive care unit-associated catabolism, and improve patient outcomes.

High dose amino acid administration achieves an anabolic response in type 2 diabetic patients that is independent of glycaemic control: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Surgical stress provokes protein catabolism and hyperglycaemia that is enhanced in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and increases perioperative morbidity. This study hypothesized that perioperative administration of high dose intravenous (IV) amino acids (AA) will augment protein balance in T2DM patients receiving tight plasma glucose control via continuous IV insulin compared to standard plasma glucose control via subcutaneous (SC) insulin sliding scale.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with well-controlled T2DM (HbA1C% < 7.1) undergoing colorectal surgery were assigned randomly to receive standard glucose control (6-10 mmol/l, SC insulin, n = 9) or tight glucose control (4-6 mmol/l, IV insulin, n = 9). Both groups received general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia. AA (1 ml/kg h Aminoven™ 10%, ∼2.4 g/kg d) were infused via a peripheral vein for two 3-h periods: at the beginning of surgery and in the post-operative care unit. Whole-body protein and glucose kinetics were assessed by stable isotope tracers, L-[1-¹³C]leucine and [6,6-²H₂]glucose.

RESULTS

Whole-body protein balance was positive after surgery in all patients. Since protein synthesis, breakdown and leucine oxidation were comparable in both groups, whole body protein balance was not different (p = 0.605). Tight glucose control suppressed endogenous glucose production (EGP, p < 0.001) and increased glucose clearance (p < 0.001) compared to standard glucose control during both study periods. No episode of hypoglycaemia occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

High-dose perioperative AA administration under optimal anti-catabolic care with epidural analgesia was effective in achieving a positive protein balance in T2DM patients undergoing surgery that was independent of glycaemic control strategy. Continuous IV insulin maintained normoglycaemia by inhibiting EGP and increasing glucose clearance. Improved glucose control, without a pronounced increase in protein balance with the intravenous insulin regimen, suggests perioperative protein metabolism may be less sensitive to insulin than is glucose.

Promoting Perioperative Metabolic and Nutritional Care

Surgery represents a major stressor that disrupts homeostasis and can lead to loss of body cell mass. Integrated, multidisciplinary medical strategies, including enhanced recovery programs and perioperative nutrition support, can mitigate the surgically induced metabolic response, promoting optimal patient recovery following major surgery. Clinical therapies should identify those who are poorly nourished before surgery and aim to attenuate catabolism while preserving the processes that promote recovery and immunoprotection after surgery. This review will address the impact of surgery on intermediary metabolism and describe the clinical consequences that ensue. It will also focus on the role of perioperative nutrition, including preoperative nutrition risk, carbohydrate loading, and early initiation of oral feeding (centered on macronutrients) in modulating surgical stress, as well as highlight the contribution of the anesthesiologist to nutritional care. Emerging therapeutic concepts such as preoperative glycemic control and prehabilitation will be discussed.