Glucosamine use, smoking and risk of incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a large prospective cohort study

Habitual use of glucosamine and adverse liver outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes and MASLD

BACKGROUND

Glucosamine is a dietary supplement commonly used to support joint health. However, there has been interest in exploring other effects of glucosamine on health outcomes due to its ant-inflammation effect.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the risks of major adverse liver outcomes (MALOs) between regular users and non-users of glucosamine among patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) using the data from a large prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Demographic, anthropometric, laboratory and medication prescription information among 18 753 patients with type 2 diabetes and MASLD was obtained from the UK Biobank. MASLD was identified based on hepatic steatosis defined by fatty liver index ≥60 plus the presence of any clues of metabolic dysregulation and cardio-metabolic risk factors, excluding patients with moderate to severe alcohol consumption.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 11.4 years, 826 incident MALOs events were recorded. Patients not regularly using glucosamine compared with patients using glucosamine showed a significantly higher risk of the composite MALOs (HR 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.69) as well as most individual MALOs except for ascites. The multivariable-adjusted HRs of MALOs within 3, 5 and 10 years among non-users of glucosamine compared with regular users were 1.79 (95% CI .69-2.03), 1.88 (95% CI 1.21-2.54) and 1.32 (95% CI 1.05-1.72), respectively. Further subgroup analyses in participants with different baseline characteristics and sensitivity analyses excluding participants who regularly took any other supplements and participants who used self-reports to diagnose diabetes confirmed the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicated that habitual use of glucosamine was associated with a low risk of individual and composite MALOs among patients with type 2 diabetes and MASLD.

Association between genetically proxied glucosamine and risk of cancer and non-neoplastic disease: A Mendelian randomization study

Introduction

Observational investigations have examined the impact of glucosamine use on the risk of cancer and non-neoplastic diseases. However, the findings from these studies face limitations arising from confounding variables, reverse causation, and conflicting reports. Consequently, the establishment of a causal relationship between habitual glucosamine consumption and the risk of cancer and non-neoplastic diseases necessitates further investigation.

Methods

For Mendelian randomization (MR) investigation, we opted to employ single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instruments that exhibit robust associations with habitual glucosamine consumption. We obtained the corresponding effect estimates of these SNPs on the risk of cancer and non-neoplastic diseases by extracting summary data for genetic instruments linked to 49 varied cancer types amounting to 378,284 cases and 533,969 controls, as well as 20 non-neoplastic diseases encompassing 292,270 cases and 842,829 controls. Apart from the primary analysis utilizing inverse-variance weighted MR, we conducted two supplementary approaches to account for potential pleiotropy (MR-Egger and weighted median) and assessed their respective MR estimates. Furthermore, the results of the leave-one-out analysis revealed that there were no outlying instruments.

Results

Our results suggest divergence from accepted biological understanding, suggesting that genetically predicted glucosamine utilization may be linked to an increased vulnerability to specific illnesses, as evidenced by increased odds ratios and confidence intervals (95% CI) for diseases, such as malignant neoplasm of the eye and adnexa (2.47 [1.34-4.55]), benign neoplasm of the liver/bile ducts (2.12 [1.32-3.43]), benign neoplasm of the larynx (2.01 [1.36-2.96]), melanoma (1.74 [1.17-2.59]), follicular lymphoma (1.50 [1.06-2.11]), autoimmune thyroiditis (2.47 [1.49-4.08]), and autoimmune hyperthyroidism (1.93 [1.17-3.18]). In contrast to prior observational research, our genetic investigations demonstrate a positive correlation between habitual glucosamine consumption and an elevated risk of sigmoid colon cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, and benign neoplasm of the thyroid gland.

Conclusion

Casting doubt on the purported purely beneficial association between glucosamine ingestion and prevention of neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases, habitual glucosamine ingestion exhibits dichotomous effects on disease outcomes. Endorsing the habitual consumption of glucosamine as a preventative measure against neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases cannot be supported.

Health effects associated with smoking: a Burden of Proof study

As a leading behavioral risk factor for numerous health outcomes, smoking is a major ongoing public health challenge. Although evidence on the health effects of smoking has been widely reported, few attempts have evaluated the dose-response relationship between smoking and a diverse range of health outcomes systematically and comprehensively. In the present study, we re-estimated the dose-response relationships between current smoking and 36 health outcomes by conducting systematic reviews up to 31 May 2022, employing a meta-analytic method that incorporates between-study heterogeneity into estimates of uncertainty. Among the 36 selected outcomes, 8 had strong-to-very-strong evidence of an association with smoking, 21 had weak-to-moderate evidence of association and 7 had no evidence of association. By overcoming many of the limitations of traditional meta-analyses, our approach provides comprehensive, up-to-date and easy-to-use estimates of the evidence on the health effects of smoking. These estimates provide important information for tobacco control advocates, policy makers, researchers, physicians, smokers and the public.

Associations of habitual glucosamine supplementation with incident gout: a large population based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The association between habitual glucosamine use and incident gout has not been examined in previous studies. We aimed to evaluate the association of habitual use of glucosamine with the risk of gout in general population.

METHODS

A total of 436,594 participants (55.4% female) without prior gout at baseline who completed a questionnaire on supplementation use, which included glucosamine, in the UK Biobank were enrolled. Incident gout was recorded from self-report, death register, primary care, and hospital admission data.

RESULTS

At baseline, 53,433 (22.1%) females and 30,685 (15.8%) males reported habitual glucosamine use. During a median follow-up period of 12.1 years, 1718 (0.7%) females and 5685 (2.9%) males developed gout. After multivariable adjustment for major risk factors, glucosamine use was associated with a significantly lower risk of incident gout in females (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.92), but not in males (HR, 1.05, 95% CI, 0.97-1.13), compared with non-use (P-interaction < 0.001). Among females, the inverse association between glucosamine use and gout was stronger in participants with diuretics use (HR, 0.64, 95% CI, 0.50-0.81) than those without diuretics use (HR, 0.89, 95% CI, 0.77-1.03) (P-interaction = 0.015). Moreover, gout genetic risk scores did not significantly modify the association between glucosamine use and the risk of incident gout in males (P-interaction = 0.548) or females (P-interaction = 0.183).

CONCLUSIONS

Habitual glucosamine use to relieve osteoarthritis pain was related to lower risk of gout in females, but not in males.