1
|
Lim TH, Mak HY, Man Ngai SM, Man YT, Tang CH, Wong AYL, Bussières A, Al Zoubi FM. Nonpharmacological Spine Pain Management in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review Using AGREE II and AGREE-REX Tools. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025; 55:12-25. [PMID: 39680669 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the content and critically appraise the quality and applicability of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for nonpharmacological, nonsurgical management of spine pain. DESIGN: Systematic review of CPGs. LITERATURE SEARCH: Six databases and seven guideline clearinghouses. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Included de novo CPGs for nonpharmacological, nonsurgical management of spine pain designed for any primary health care providers, published in English, Arabic, French, or traditional Chinese within the past 12 years. DATA SYNTHESIS: Five reviewers independently appraised the guidelines using AGREE II and AGREE-REX. Interrater agreements were calculated for each domain and the total score of these tools using the intraclass correlation coefficient (2, 1) with absolute agreement. RESULTS: We included 30 CPGs, primarily (90%) developed in Western countries, which contained 404 recommendations. High-quality CPGs consistently recommended exercise therapy and multimodal care, encompassing a combination of exercises, mobilization/manipulation, education, alternative medicine, and cognitive-behavioral treatments. Generally, CPGs did not recommend assistive (eg, corsets and orthosis) devices or electro/thermotherapies (eg, therapeutic ultrasound and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation). Approximately half of the CPGs demonstrated good methodological quality according to AGREE II, whereas the rest were of poor quality. On the AGREE-REX assessment, one third of the recommendations were of excellent quality. CONCLUSION: Although recent guidelines frequently recommended exercise therapy and multimodal care for the management of spine pain, their recommendations often overlooked demographics and comorbidities. Despite methodological improvements, most CPGs lacked simple clinical applicability and considerations of knowledge users' values. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-14. Epub 4 November 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12729.
Collapse
|
2
|
Korai A, Thomson I, Carey S, Allman-Farinelli M. A systematic review and quality appraisal of guidelines and recommendations for home enteral tube feeding in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 2024:10.1038/s41430-024-01500-1. [PMID: 39227692 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-024-01500-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Revised: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
Home Enteral Tube Feeding (HETF) is a viable option for people within primary care settings when oral intake is insufficient to meet nutritional needs. As HETF is not a risk-free therapy, guidelines exist to enable its safe provision. This review aims to summarise existing guidelines and their recommendations pertaining to the provision of HETF and appraise their methodological quality. A systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews, PRISMA-checklist and a 2019 methodological guide specific to the review of clinical practice guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023456223). Records were sourced from five bibliographical databases (Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Scopus, Cinahl) and the grey literature (64 websites, seven guideline repositories). The AGREE-II tool was applied to eligible guidelines. The recommendations of guidelines meeting a predetermined threshold score (domain 3 'rigour of development' score >70%) were extracted, grouped, and assessed using the AGREE-REX tool. A total of 2707 records were screened with 15 guidelines meeting eligibility criteria. The median (IQR) overall AGREE-II score (/7) of all guidelines was 3 (3-5) and only 3/15 guidelines achieved a domain 3 score >70%. The median (IQR) overall AGREE-REX score was 33% (26-37%). No recommendation group achieved a domain score above 70%. No guideline or recommendation group was suggested for use without modification. Key limitations included suboptimal stakeholder involvement and implementability, and lack of methodological transparency. Current HETF guidelines inadequately align with methodological standards. This review highlights key areas HETF guideline developers should consider to create more relevant and implementable guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andriana Korai
- Nutrition and Dietetics Group, Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Isabella Thomson
- Nutrition and Dietetics Group, Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Sharon Carey
- Nutrition and Dietetics Group, Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Margaret Allman-Farinelli
- Nutrition and Dietetics Group, Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ding Z, Wang M, Chen J, Mei Z, Li W, Xu G. Long-term care for community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements. Geriatr Nurs 2024; 58:135-143. [PMID: 38810290 DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
This review identified clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements (CSs) that include recommendations on long-term care for community-dwelling older adults. Additionally, it assessed their quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool to determine high-quality guidelines and synthesis recommendations from high-quality guidelines and evaluate the quality of these guidelines using the AGREE-Recommendation Excellence (AGREE-REX) tool. A systematic search was performed (November 2023) in MEDLINE, PubMed, Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG), Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Two reviewers independently selected and assessed the articles using AGREE II. A meeting was held to appraise the quality of the guidelines (AGREE II mean score >70 %) using AGREE-REX. The analysis included 14 CPGs and 2 CSs. Of these, 7 CPGs reached the standard of >70 %, the 'Scope and purpose' domain obtained the highest score with 85.43 (± 17.87), and the 'Applicability' domain scored lowest with 46.93 (± 26.74). Regarding the score of AGREE-REX, the seven CPGs were considered as 'moderate', with the 'Clinical Applicability' domain having the highest score of 61.29 % (±10.80) and the 'Values and Preferences' domain having the lowest score of 38.14 % (±9.26). Four themes were synthesised from the seven high-quality CPGs: planning and delivering person-centred home care, cognitive impairment, and screening for impaired vision and falls. The quality of CPGs and CSs on long-term care for community-dwelling older adults has room for improvement, and higher-quality guidelines are required to meet the long-term care needs of community-dwelling older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zichun Ding
- School of nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Meng Wang
- School of nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Junyu Chen
- School of nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Ziqi Mei
- School of nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Weitong Li
- School of nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Guihua Xu
- School of nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hickson M, Papoutsakis C, Madden AM, Smith MA, Whelan K. Nature of the evidence base and approaches to guide nutrition interventions for individuals: a position paper from the Academy of Nutrition Sciences. Br J Nutr 2024; 131:1754-1773. [PMID: 38305040 DOI: 10.1017/s0007114524000291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
This Position Paper from the Academy of Nutrition Sciences is the third in a series which describe the nature of the scientific evidence and frameworks that underpin nutrition recommendations for health. This paper focuses on evidence which guides the application of dietary recommendations for individuals. In some situations, modified nutrient intake becomes essential to prevent deficiency, optimise development and health, or manage symptoms and disease progression. Disease and its treatment can also affect taste, appetite and ability to access and prepare foods, with associated financial impacts. Therefore, the practice of nutrition and dietetics must integrate and apply the sciences of food, nutrition, biology, physiology, behaviour, management, communication and society to achieve and maintain human health. Thus, there is huge complexity in delivering evidence-based nutrition interventions to individuals. This paper examines available frameworks for appraising the quality and certainty of nutrition research evidence, the development nutrition practice guidelines to support evidence implementation in practice and the influence of other sources of nutrition information and misinformation. The paper also considers major challenges in applying research evidence to an individual and suggests consensus recommendations to begin to address these challenges in the future. Our recommendations target three groups; those who deliver nutrition interventions to individuals, those funding, commissioning or undertaking research aimed at delivering evidence-based nutrition practice, and those disseminating nutritional information to individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Hickson
- University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL4 6ABDevon, UK
- British Dietetic Association, Birmingham, UK
| | - Constantina Papoutsakis
- Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Nutrition and Dietetics Data Science Centre, Research, International, and Scientific Affairs (RISA), Chicago, USA
| | | | | | - Kevin Whelan
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK
- Academy of Nutrition Sciences, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
De Vito M, Alameddine S, Capannolo G, Mappa I, Gualtieri P, Di Renzo L, De Lorenzo A, D’ Antonio F, Rizzo G. Systematic Review and Critical Evaluation of Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Nutrition in Pregnancy. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10122490. [PMID: 36554014 PMCID: PMC9778102 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To report the quality and clinical heterogeneity of the published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on nutrition in pregnancy. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases were searched. The following aspects related to nutrition in pregnancy were addressed: specific requirements during pregnancy, description of a balanced diet, weight gain, prevention of food-borne, nutrition in peculiar sub-groups of women, and maternal or perinatal outcomes. The assessment of the risk of bias and quality assessment of the included CPGs were performed using “The Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation (AGREE II)” tool divided in six quality domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, editorial independence. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was used to summarize the scores across all the guidelines per domain. The quality of each guideline was computed using the scoring system proposed by Amer et al. A cut-off of >60% was sued to define a CGP as recommended. Results: Eighteen CPGs were included. There was a substantial heterogeneity in the recommended dose for vitamins, folic acid, and micronutrient intake during pregnancy among the different published CPGs. 27.8% (5/18) of the CPGs recommended a daily intake of folic acid of 200 mcg, 38.8% (7/18) 400 mcg, 16.7% (3/18) 600 mcg while the remaining CPGs suggested dose between 400 and 600−800 mc per day. Adequate maternal hydration was advocated in the large majority of included CPGs, but a specific amount of water intake was not reported in 83.3% (15/18) cases. There was also significant heterogeneity in various other aspects of nutrition recommendation among the different CPGs, including gestational weight gain (55.5%), prevention of food-borne diseases in pregnancy (72.2%), nutrition in particular groups of pregnant women (83.3%), maternal and perinatal outcomes (72.2%). The AGREE II standardized domain scores for the first overall assessment (OA1) had a mean of 65% but only half scored more than 60%. Conclusion: The published CPGs on nutrition in pregnancy show an overall good methodology, but also a substantial heterogeneity as regard as different major aspects on nutrition in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika De Vito
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Sara Alameddine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Giulia Capannolo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Ilenia Mappa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Paola Gualtieri
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Università di Roma Tor Vergata Section of Clinical Nutrition and Nutrigenomic, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Laura Di Renzo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Università di Roma Tor Vergata Section of Clinical Nutrition and Nutrigenomic, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Antonino De Lorenzo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Università di Roma Tor Vergata Section of Clinical Nutrition and Nutrigenomic, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco D’ Antonio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rizzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, 00185 Roma, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Noyahr JK, Tatucu-Babet OA, Chapple LAS, Barlow CJ, Chapman MJ, Deane AM, Fetterplace K, Hodgson CL, Winderlich J, Udy AA, Marshall AP, Ridley EJ. Methodological Rigor and Transparency in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition Care in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review Using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX Tools. Nutrients 2022; 14:2603. [PMID: 35807784 PMCID: PMC9268338 DOI: 10.3390/nu14132603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the methodological quality of (1) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that inform nutrition care in critically ill adults using the AGREE II tool and (2) CPG recommendations for determining energy expenditure using the AGREE-REX tool. Methods: CPGs by a professional society or academic group, intended to guide nutrition care in critically ill adults, that used a systematic literature search and rated the evidence were included. Four databases and grey literature were searched from January 2011 to 19 January 2022. Five investigators assessed the methodological quality of CPGs and recommendations specific to energy expenditure determination. Scaled domain scores were calculated for AGREE II and a scaled total score for AGREE-REX. Data are presented as medians (interquartile range). Results: Eleven CPGs were included. Highest scoring domains for AGREE II were clarity of presentation (82% [76-87%]) and scope and purpose (78% [66-83%]). Lowest scoring domains were applicability (37% [32-42%]) and stakeholder involvement (46% [33-51%]). Eight (73%) CPGs provided recommendations relating to energy expenditure determination; scores were low overall (37% [36-40%]) and across individual domains. Conclusions: Nutrition CPGs for critically ill patients are developed using systematic methods but lack engagement with key stakeholders and guidance to support application. The quality of energy expenditure determination recommendations is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K. Noyahr
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.K.N.); (O.A.T.-B.); (C.L.H.); (J.W.); (A.A.U.)
| | - Oana A. Tatucu-Babet
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.K.N.); (O.A.T.-B.); (C.L.H.); (J.W.); (A.A.U.)
| | - Lee-anne S. Chapple
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia;
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia;
| | - Christopher Jake Barlow
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland 1023, New Zealand;
| | - Marianne J. Chapman
- Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia;
| | - Adam M. Deane
- Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne Medical School, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; (A.M.D.); (K.F.)
| | - Kate Fetterplace
- Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne Medical School, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; (A.M.D.); (K.F.)
- Department of Allied Health (Clinical Nutrition), Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia
| | - Carol L. Hodgson
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.K.N.); (O.A.T.-B.); (C.L.H.); (J.W.); (A.A.U.)
- Intensive Care Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Jacinta Winderlich
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.K.N.); (O.A.T.-B.); (C.L.H.); (J.W.); (A.A.U.)
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Monash Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia
| | - Andrew A. Udy
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.K.N.); (O.A.T.-B.); (C.L.H.); (J.W.); (A.A.U.)
- Intensive Care Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Andrea P. Marshall
- Intensive Care Unit, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD 4215, Australia;
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Emma J. Ridley
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.K.N.); (O.A.T.-B.); (C.L.H.); (J.W.); (A.A.U.)
- Nutrition Department, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|