Penetration of penicillin V to tonsillar surface fluid in healthy individuals and in patients with acute tonsillitis

Antibiotics for recurrent acute pharyngo-tonsillitis: systematic review

The purpose was to determine the current evidence for preferable antibiotic treatment in three common clinical situations with insufficient consensus: Q1: Can antibiotic treatment prevent future attacks of acute pharyngo-tonsillitis (APT) in patients with recurrent APT (RAPT)? Q2: Which antibiotic regimen is preferable in the treatment of APT in patients with RAPT? Q3: Which antibiotic regimen is preferable in the treatment of relapsing APT? Five databases were searched systematically for randomized clinical trials on patients with RAPT with or without current APT or with relapse of APT. Of the unique publications, 643 were found. Five studies addressing Q1 (n = 3) and Q2 (n = 2) met the eligibility criteria. No studies reporting on Q3 were included. Q1: Two studies found that clindamycin and cefpodoxime, respectively, were effective in preventing future APT episodes and in eradicating group A streptococci from the tonsils of RAPT patients. One study found that long-term azithromycin had no effect on the number of APT episodes. Q2: Two studies reported superior clinical and microbiological effects of clindamycin and amoxicillin with clavulanate, respectively, compared to penicillin. The four studies showing superior effects of clindamycin and amoxicillin with clavulanate were assessed to have high risk of bias. Hence, the level of evidence was moderate. There is considerable evidence to suggest that clindamycin and amoxicillin with clavulanate are superior to penicillin with preferable effects on the microbiological flora and the number of future attacks of APT in patients with RAPT. Antibiotic treatment is an option in patients with RAPT, who has contraindications for tonsillectomy.

Treatment Challenges of Group A Beta-hemolytic Streptococcal Pharyngo-Tonsillitis

Introduction  Despite its in vitro efficacy, penicillin often fails to eradicate Group A β-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) from patients with acute and relapsing pharyngo-tonsillitis (PT). Objective  This review of the literature details the causes of penicillin failure to eradicate GABHS PT and the therapeutic modalities to reduce and overcome antimicrobial failure. Data Synthesis  The causes of penicillin failure in eradicating GABHS PT include the presence of β lactamase producing bacteria (BLPB) that "protect" GABHS from any penicillin; the absence of bacteria that interfere with the growth of GABHS; co-aggregation between GABHS and Moraxella catarrhalis; and the poor penetration of penicillin into the tonsillar tissues and the tonsillo-pharyngeal cells, which allows intracellular GABHS and Staphylococcus aureus to survive. The inadequate intracellular penetration of penicillin can allow intracellular GABHS and S. aureus to persist. In the treatment of acute tonsillitis, the use of cephalosporin can overcome these interactions by eradicating aerobic BLPB (including M. catarrhalis), while preserving the potentially interfering organisms and eliminating GABHS. Conclusion  In treatment of recurrent and chronic PT, the administration of clindamycin, or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, can eradicate both aerobic and anaerobic BLPB, as well as GABHS. The superior intracellular penetration of cephalosporin and clindamycin also enhances their efficacy against intracellular GABHS and S. aureus.

Systematic review of factors contributing to penicillin treatment failure in Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis

Objective

Review the evidence for various explanations for microbiologic treatment failure following use of penicillin in group A streptococcal (GAS) tonsillopharyngitis.

DATA SOURCE

Systematic review of the literature based on Medline and EMBASE searches, and review of reference lists of included studies.

RESULTS

The explanations for penicillin treatment failure in GAS tonsillopharyngitis include 1) carrier state, 2) lack of compliance, 3) recurrent exposure, 4) in vivo copathogenicity of β-lactamase–producing normal pharyngeal flora, 5) in vivo bacterial coaggregation, 6) poor antibiotic penetration to tonsillopharyngeal tissue, 7) in vivo eradication of normal protective flora, 8) early initiation of antibiotic therapy resulting in suppression of an adequate host immune response, 9) intracellular localization of GAS, 10) GAS tolerance to penicillin, 11) contaminated toothbrushes or orthodontic appliances, and 12) transmission from the family pet. There is very little type I or II evidence to support any of the above-cited explanations for treatment failure in GAS tonsillopharyngitis; available studies are mostly observational (in patients) or laboratory-based without clinical confirmation.

CONCLUSION

Multiple explanations have been offered by investigators to explain penicillin treatment failures in GAS tonsillopharyngitis, but the evidence base to support the proposed explanations is generally weak by current standards. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanism(s) of penicillin treatment failure in GAS tonsillopharyngitis.

Disease manifestations and pathogenic mechanisms of Group A Streptococcus

Streptococcus pyogenes, also known as group A Streptococcus (GAS), causes mild human infections such as pharyngitis and impetigo and serious infections such as necrotizing fasciitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Furthermore, repeated GAS infections may trigger autoimmune diseases, including acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, acute rheumatic fever, and rheumatic heart disease. Combined, these diseases account for over half a million deaths per year globally. Genomic and molecular analyses have now characterized a large number of GAS virulence determinants, many of which exhibit overlap and redundancy in the processes of adhesion and colonization, innate immune resistance, and the capacity to facilitate tissue barrier degradation and spread within the human host. This improved understanding of the contribution of individual virulence determinants to the disease process has led to the formulation of models of GAS disease progression, which may lead to better treatment and intervention strategies. While GAS remains sensitive to all penicillins and cephalosporins, rising resistance to other antibiotics used in disease treatment is an increasing worldwide concern. Several GAS vaccine formulations that elicit protective immunity in animal models have shown promise in nonhuman primate and early-stage human trials. The development of a safe and efficacious commercial human vaccine for the prophylaxis of GAS disease remains a high priority.

Disease manifestations and pathogenic mechanisms of Group A Streptococcus

Streptococcus pyogenes, also known as group A Streptococcus (GAS), causes mild human infections such as pharyngitis and impetigo and serious infections such as necrotizing fasciitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Furthermore, repeated GAS infections may trigger autoimmune diseases, including acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, acute rheumatic fever, and rheumatic heart disease. Combined, these diseases account for over half a million deaths per year globally. Genomic and molecular analyses have now characterized a large number of GAS virulence determinants, many of which exhibit overlap and redundancy in the processes of adhesion and colonization, innate immune resistance, and the capacity to facilitate tissue barrier degradation and spread within the human host. This improved understanding of the contribution of individual virulence determinants to the disease process has led to the formulation of models of GAS disease progression, which may lead to better treatment and intervention strategies. While GAS remains sensitive to all penicillins and cephalosporins, rising resistance to other antibiotics used in disease treatment is an increasing worldwide concern. Several GAS vaccine formulations that elicit protective immunity in animal models have shown promise in nonhuman primate and early-stage human trials. The development of a safe and efficacious commercial human vaccine for the prophylaxis of GAS disease remains a high priority.

Opportunistic respiratory pathogens in the oral cavity of the elderly

The oral cavity of the hospitalized or bedridden elderly is often a reservoir for opportunistic pathogens associated with respiratory diseases. Commensal flora and the host interact in a balanced fashion and oral infections are considered to appear following an imbalance in the oral resident microbiota, leading to the emergence of potentially pathogenic bacteria. The definition of the process involved in colonization by opportunistic respiratory pathogens needs to elucidate the factors responsible for the transition of the microbiota from commensal to pathogenic flora. The regulatory factors influencing the oral ecosystem can be divided into three major categories: the host defense system, commensal bacteria, and external pathogens. In this article, we review the profile of these categories including the intricate cellular interaction between immune factors and commensal bacteria and the disturbance in homeostasis in the oral cavity of hospitalized or bedridden elderly, which facilitates oral colonization by opportunistic respiratory pathogens.

Penicillin V, loracarbef and clindamycin in tonsillar surface fluid during acute group A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis

A previously healthy 37-y-old male presented with community-acquired pneumonia and extensive upper limb deep vein thrombosis. The diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia was made based on a positive direct immunofluorescence of the bronchial wash. An extensive investigation for hypercoagulable states was negative. The possible association between Legionella infection and deep vein thrombosis is highlighted.

Overcoming penicillin failures in the treatment of Group A streptococcal pharyngo-tonsillitis

The causes of penicillin failure in eradicating Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngo-tonsillitis (GABHS PT) are described. These include the presence of beta-lactamase producing bacteria that "protect" Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) from penicillins; the absence of bacteria that interfere with the growth of GABHS; co-aggregation between GABHS and Moraxella catarrhalis; and the poor penetration of penicillin into the tonsillar tissues and the tonsillo-pharyngeal cells. The use of antimicrobials that can overcome and modulate these phenomena and achieve better cure of the infection is described.

Meta-analysis of Cephalosporins versus Penicillin for Treatment of Group A Streptococcal Tonsillopharyngitis in Adults

We conducted a meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials (involving 2113 patients) comparing cephalosporins with penicillin for treatment of group A beta -hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis in adults. The summary odds ratio (OR) for bacteriologic cure rate significantly favored cephalosporins, compared with penicillin (OR,1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.44); the bacteriologic failure rate was nearly 2 times higher for penicillin therapy than it was for cephalosporin therapy (P=.00004). The summary OR for clinical cure rate was 2.29 (95% CI, 1.61-3.28), significantly favoring cephalosporins (P<.00001). Sensitivity analyses for bacterial cure significantly favored cephalosporins over penicillin in trials that were double-blinded and of high quality, trials that had a well-defined clinical status, trials that performed GABHS serotyping, trials that eliminated carriers from analysis, and trials that had a test-of-cure culture performed 3-14 days after treatment. This meta-analysis indicates that the likelihood of bacteriologic and clinical failure in the treatment of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis is 2 times higher for oral penicillin than for oral cephalosporins.

Meta-analysis of cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis in children.

METHODOLOGY

Medline, Embase, reference lists, and abstract searches were conducted to identify randomized, controlled trials of cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis in children. Trials were included if they met the following criteria: patients <18 years old, bacteriologic confirmation of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis, random assignment to antibiotic therapy of an orally administered cephalosporin or penicillin for 10 days of treatment, and assessment of bacteriologic outcome using a throat culture after therapy. Primary outcomes of interest were bacteriologic and clinical cure rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of careful clinical illness descriptions, compliance monitoring, GABHS serotyping, exclusion of GABHS carriers, and timing of the test-of-cure visit.

RESULTS

Thirty-five trials involving 7125 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall summary odds ratio (OR) for the bacteriologic cure rate significantly favored cephalosporins compared with penicillin (OR: 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.49-3.67, with the individual cephalosporins [cephalexin, cefadroxil, cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, cefixime, ceftibuten, and cefdinir] showing superior bacteriologic cure rates). The overall summary OR for clinical cure rate was 2.33 (95% CI: 1.84-2.97), significantly favoring the same individual cephalosporins. There was a trend for diminishing bacterial cure with penicillin over time, comparing the trials published in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. Sensitivity analyses for bacterial cure significantly favored cephalosporin treatment over penicillin treatment when trials were grouped as double-blind (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.39-3.85), high-quality (OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.85-3.36) trials with well-defined clinical status (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.54-2.90), with detailed compliance monitoring (OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 2.33-3.47), with GABHS serotyping (OR: 3.10; 95% CI: 2.42-3.98), with carriers eliminated (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.55-4.08), and with test of cure 3 to 14 days posttreatment (OR: 3.53; 95% CI: 2.75-4.54). Analysis of comparative bacteriologic cure rates for the 3 generations of cephalosporins did not show a difference.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicates that the likelihood of bacteriologic and clinical failure of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis is significantly less if an oral cephalosporin is prescribed, compared with oral penicillin.

Short-course antimicrobial therapy of streptococcal pharyngitis

While penicillin administered orally or intramuscularly is the least expensive course of pharyngitis treatment, there are many limitations to its use. These include the need for extended treatment (i.e., 10 days) and poor palatability of its liquid formulation and an alarming increase in the rates of failure with standard doses of either IM or oral penicillin. Increasing rates of beta-lactamase-producing normal flora and eradication of protective alpha-streptococci may also play a role in penicillin treatment failure. Thus practitioners may consider switching to amoxicillin in higher doses (up to 40 to 60 mg/kg/day divided twice daily, maximum dose 1 gram twice daily) as first-line therapy (Figure 1), similar to what we have done for acute otitis media. Five-day short-course treatment with cefdinir or cefpodoxime may be suitable alternatives, especially in patients with penicillin hypersensitivity (not anaphylaxis). Concerns with higher costs of these second-line agents and potential for resistance must be balanced with concerns for patient adherence with penicillin treatment and the recent increasing rate of penicillin failures. In light of recent reports regarding the high rate of failure with azithromycin and increasing macrolide resistance, clinicians should prescribe standard doses of this drug for 5 days with caution.

Efficacy of penicillin vs. amoxicillin in children with group A beta hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis

The purpose of this study was to compare the bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of oral penicillin versus amoxicillin as first-line therapy for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis. The prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months (January 2000-June 2001). Children enrolled had acute onset of symptoms and signs and a laboratory-documented GABHS tonsillopharyngitis illness. Follow-up examination and laboratory testing occurred 10 +/- 4 days following completion of treatment. In total, 389 patients were enrolled (intent-to-treat group): 195 received penicillin V and 194 received amoxicillin. Fifty-six of the penicillin-treated and 57 amoxicillin-treated patients refused to take the drug, or were noncompliant, or did not return for the follow-up visit, leaving 276 patients in the per-protocol group: 139 penicillin-treated and 137 amoxicillin-treated. Bacteriologic cure for amoxicillin-treated children occurred in 76% versus 64% in the penicillin-treated children (p = 0.04). The clinical cure rate for amoxicillin-treated children was 84% compared to 73% in the penicillin-treated children (p = 0.03). Since treatment allocation was not randomized, logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for treatment group differences. The odds ratio (OR) estimate for cure for patients in the amoxicillin versus penicillin V treatment group remained significant (OR = 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.29); the same was true for dinical cure (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.02-3.87). Amoxicillin may be superior to penicillin for bacteriologic and clinical cure of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis.

Penicillin treatment failure in group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: no genetic difference found between strains isolated from failures and nonfailures

Despite penicillin (pcV) treatment, tonsillopharyngitis caused by group A streptococci (GAS) is associated with bacterial failure rates as high as 25%. The reason for this rate of failure is not fully understood. One explanation might be that certain DNA profiles of GAS strains are responsible for treatment failures. Using arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR), we compared the DNA profiles of GAS strains from 4 patients with several treatment failures following pcV treatment of tonsillopharyngitis with the profiles of strains of the same T type from patients who were clinically and bacteriologically cured after a single course of pcV. The isolates were obtained during the same time period and from the same geographic area. Thirty-seven strains of T types 4, 12, and R28 were investigated. Eleven different DNA profiles could be detected with the AP-PCR technique. Five DNA profiles were identified as T type 12, 3 as T type 4, and 3 as T type R28. The DNA profiles of the strains from the 4 patients with several treatment failures differed, but all isolates from each one of these patients exhibited the same or a very similar profile. The DNA profiles of the failure strains were also represented in nonfailure strains. Treatment failure in these 4 patients therefore seems to be due to insufficient eradication of GAS, rather than to reinfection with a new strain. The finding that the same DNA profile can be present in both failure and nonfailure strains suggests that the treatment failure may be to some extent host-related and not only due to bacterial factors.

Evaluating the need, timing and best choice of antibiotic therapy for acute otitis media and tonsillopharyngitis infections in children

Deciding whether an antibiotic is necessary, when to begin therapy and selecting an optimal drug is an everyday challenge in clinical practice. In vitro susceptibility testing which determines the minimum concentration necessary for a particular antibiotic to inhibit or kill most strains of a bacterial species and pharmacodynamic modeling are useful but have limitations. The need for antibiotic therapy for acute otitis media (AOM) has been recently questioned. However, explanations for uniformly positive results with many antibiotic and placebo comparative trials include overdiagnosis of AOM at study entry, inclusion of patients with mild or uncomplicated AOM and broad criteria for the definition of clinical success. Recurrent and persistent AOM does not have as favorable a natural history as uncomplicated AOM; children below 2 years of age benefit most from antibiotic therapy. Selecting the best choice among the many antibiotics that can be used to treat AOM has become more complex over the last decade due to escalating antibiotic resistance among the pathogens that cause this infection. Broader spectrum antibiotics such as cefdinir, the newly introduced third generation cephalosporin, have their most prominent use in the treatment of persistent and recurrent AOM. In the early 1950s and 1960s penicillin clearly was the best available agent for the treatment of group A streptococcal (GAS) infections. In the 1970s the situation began to change as cephalosporin antibiotics became available. Superior eradication rates with cephalosporins such as cefdinir have now been well-documented. The leading hypothesis to explain the widening gap in efficacy between penicillin and cephalosporins relates to two major concepts: the presence of copathogens and differential alteration of the normal microbial ecology in the throat as a consequence of the selected therapy. There are positive and negative consequences to early initiation of antibiotic therapy for GAS tonsillopharyngitis. Penicillin has persisting good efficacy in patients older than the age of 12 years and in those who have been ill for >2 days. Shortening therapy for GAS tonsillopharyngitis offers a therapeutic advantage. Cefpodoxime proxetil and cefdinir have a 5-day indication for the treatment of GAS tonsillopharyngitis. Antibiotics with lower side effect profile, infrequent dosing, good palatability in suspension formulation and efficacy with short duration of treatment may lead to better outcomes because noncompliance often results in failed therapy, persistence of infection and morbidity.

Clindamycin in recurrent group A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis--an alternative to tonsillectomy?

Fifty-three patients with bacterial treatment failure after a 10-day course of treatment with phenoxymethyl penicillin (pcV) for group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngotonsillitis were randomly assigned to continued treatment with pcV, or to treatment with clindamycin instead. The patients were then followed for 1 year with throat cultures and clinical examination every third month and in the event of symptoms of sore throat. In the first 3-month period, 15/22 patients in the pcV group yielded one or more positive cultures for GAS, all of the same T-type as in the original throat culture, as compared to 3/26 in the clindamycin group (p < 0.001). All three cases in the clindamycin group were due to a new T-type and thus were re-infections. In the pcV group, owing to repeated treatment failure, 12/22 patients were switched to treatment with clindamycin within the 3-month period following the second treatment. During the remainder of the 1-year follow-up period, sporadic cases of GAS-positive throat cultures occurred in both groups, but there was no significant difference in frequency between the two groups. It is concluded that, in patients with GAS pharyngotonsillitis and failure after pcV treatment, a 10-day course of clindamycin can protect the patient from recurrence for at least 3 months and might be an alternative to tonsillectomy.

Treatment failure in streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis. An attempt to identify penicillin tolerant Streptococcus pyogenes

Penicillin tolerance in group A streptococci has been suggested to cause treatment failures in pharyngotonsillitis. In the present study, group A streptococci from patients with pharyngotonsillitis, who healed (n = 33) or failed (n = 25) on phenoxymethylpenicillin therapy for 10 days, as well as isolates obtained following the first (n = 25) and second (n = 7) failure were tested for penicillin tolerance by a plate-screening method. For most strains, the survival rate after a 6-h exposure of log-phase bacteria (10(4) CFU) to a phenoxymethylpenicillin concentration of 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was below 0.1%. Five strains from cases of failure, exhibiting survival rates of 0.2-0.5%, were subjected to time killing kinetic tests with phenoxymethylpenicillin at 12 times the MIC. At 6 h each of the strains from failures showed survival rates below 0.03%. One single group A strain, previously selected in our laboratory, showed a survival rate of 0.4-1.2%, which was close to tolerance as defined. Four streptococcal strains, earlier reported as tolerant, showed survival rates of > 1% but were found to be group G. Penicillin tolerance does not significantly contribute to failures in penicillin therapy of group A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis, but seems to be a common property of group C and G streptococci.

Randomized evaluation of benzathine penicillin V twice daily versus potassium penicillin V three times daily in the treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Pharyngitis Study Group

In a randomized, prospective, multicenter study the clinical and bacteriological efficacies of three dosage schedules with two different salts of oral penicillin V suspensions (regimen 1: potassium salt of penicillin V, 50,000 U/kg of body weight per day in three divided doses; regimen 2: benzathine salt of penicillin V, 50,000 U/kg of body weight per day in two divided doses; and regimen 3: benzathine salt of penicillin V, 100,000 U/kg of body weight in two divided doses) for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis were evaluated. Children with clinical signs of acute pharyngitis and a positive throat culture for group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) were eligible. There was no difference between the treatment groups with respect to the overall clinical success rate. Eradication of the original serotype of GABHS from throat cultures was achieved in 87.1% (regimen 1), 85.5% (regimen 2) and 87.7% (regimen 3) of patients. The incidence of potential drug-related adverse events was significantly higher in patients treated with regimen 3. The results of this and earlier studies strongly suggest that oral penicillin given twice daily should be the recommended treatment for the initial treatment of pharyngitis due to GABHS. Doubling the total daily dose is not beneficial in the usual clinical setting. Because of its favorable pharmacokinetics, the benzathine salt of penicillin V appears to be well suited for a twice-a-day dosage schedule.

Clindamycin in persisting streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis after penicillin treatment

239 patients with streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis completed treatment with phenoxymethyl penicillin 12.5 mg per kg body weight b.i.d. for 10 days. At examination after completing therapy, throat specimens from 53 patients (22%) yielded growth of group A streptococci of the same. T-type as the initial culture (bacterial treatment failure). 20 of these 53 (38%) had symptoms and signs of tonsillitis (clinical and bacterial treatment failure). 48 of the patients with bacterial failure were randomly allocated to phenoxymethyl penicillin or clindamycin in an open design; 22 of them received a second course of phenoxymethyl penicillin for 10 days and 26 were given clindamycin, 6.5 mg per kg body weight b.i.d. (children) or 300 mg t.i.d. (adults) for 10 days. After completing their treatment, 14 of 22 patients (64%) given phenoxymethyl penicillin harboured the same T-type as in the previous two cultures, while group A streptococci were not recovered from any of the 26 patients receiving clindamycin. In patients with clinical failure after phenoxymethyl penicillin treatment, a new course with this drug is not motivated. In that situation clindamycin seems to be an efficient choice.