Acid posterior laryngitis. Aetiology, histology, diagnosis and treatment

Establishment of an immortalized laryngeal posterior commissure cell line as a tool for reflux research

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) has been implicated as a promoter of laryngeal cancer. Within the larynx, the posterior commissure (PC) is the region that usually comes into direct contact with refluxed materials. Specific laryngeal cell lines useful for in vitro studies are not widely available, and noncancer-derived PC laryngeal cell line has not yet been described.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study.

METHODS

Specimens of squamous epithelium from the PC of the larynx were collected from patients without a history or evidence of laryngeal inflammatory or neoplastic diseases. Harvested tissue was cultured and then immortalized by transduction with human papillomavirus E6/E7-encoding lentivirus. PC primary and transformed cells were characterized by light microscopy and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Primary cultures established from PC contained < 5% fibroblasts and displayed normal epithelial cell morphology and cytokeratin expression. These cells survived nine passages in culture. Following lentiviral-mediated immortalization, cells retained normal squamous epithelial morphology and survived > 20 passages in culture. Methods were optimized for culture of PC laryngeal epithelial cells, resulting in 90% success rate of culture.

CONCLUSION

A novel immortalized PC laryngeal epithelial cell line has been established. This cell line provides a unique tool for investigating the mechanism of LPR in the development and progression of laryngeal cancer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Upregulation of the esophago-UES relaxation response: a possible pathophysiological mechanism in suspected reflux laryngitis

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate or excessive, non-swallow related, reflexive relaxation of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in response to esophageal distension may be the principal mechanism permitting retrograde trans-sphincteric flow during acid regurgitation. The neural pathways mediating reflexive UES relaxation in the human have received little attention. Patients with laryngitis demonstrate an increased acid reflux in the proximal esophagus. Such events, combined with an increased tendency for UES relaxation, might precipitate regurgitation into the pharynx. The aim was to determine whether the esophago-UES relaxation reflex induced by rapid esophageal distension is upregulated in patients with posterior laryngitis.

METHODS

In 21 healthy volunteers and 14 patients with posterior laryngitis, UES responses to rapid air insufflation were examined. UES responses were monitored with perfused manometry catheter with a oval sleeve sensor.

KEY RESULTS

The probability of triggering UES relaxation in response to the rapid esophageal air distension, for all volumes of insufflation, was higher in laryngitis (45%) than in health (17%). The minimum distension volume required to elicit an UES relaxation response was significantly lower in laryngitis patients when compared with controls. Patients who demonstrated a laryngoscopic response to a trial of omeprazole, were less likely to generate a distension-induced UES contractile response (5%) than patients who did not respond (23%).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The threshold for esophageal distension-induced UES relaxation is reduced in patients with laryngitis when compared with controls. This finding supports the hypothesis that in this population, a hypersensitive belch-like response may be one contributory mechanism of regurgitation when triggered by an abrupt spontaneous gastro-esophageal reflux event.

Effectiveness of voice therapy in reflux-related voice disorders

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with laryngopharyngeal reflux plays a significant role in voice disorders. A significant proportion of patients attending ear, nose, and throat clinics with voice disorders may have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). There is no controlled study of the effect of voice therapy on GERD. We assessed the effect of voice therapy in patients with dysphonia and GERD. Thirty-two patients with dysphonia and GERD underwent indirect laryngoscopy and voice analysis. Esophageal and laryngeal symptoms were assessed using the reflux symptom index (RSI). At endoscopy, esophagitis was graded according to Los Angeles classification. Patients were randomized to receive either voice therapy and omeprazole (20 mg bid) (n=16, mean [SD] age 36.1 [9.6] y; 5 men; Gp A) or omeprazole alone (n=16, age 31.8 [11.7] y; 9 men; Gp B). During voice analysis, jitter, shimmer, harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR) and normalized noise energy (NNE) were assessed using the Dr. Speech software (version 4 1998; Tigers DRS, Inc). Hoarseness and breathiness of voice were assessed using a perceptual rating scale of 0-3. Parameters were reassessed after 6 weeks, and analyzed using parametric or nonparametric tests as applicable. In Group A, 9 patients had Grade A, 3 had Grade B, and 1 had Grade C esophagitis; 3 had normal study. In Group B, 8 patients had Grade A, 2 had Grade B esophagitis, and 6 had normal study. Baseline findings: median RSI scores were comparable (Group A 20.0 [range 14-27], Group B 19.0 [15-24]). Median rating was 2.0 for hoarseness and breathiness for both groups. Values in Groups A and B for jitter 0.5 (0.6) versus 0.5 (0.8), shimmer 3.1 (2.5) versus 2.8 (2.0), HNR 23.0 (5.6) versus 23.1 (4.2), and NNE -7.3 (3.2) versus -7.2 (3.4) were similar. Post-therapy values for Groups A and B: RSI scores were 9.0 (5-13; P<0.01 as compared with baseline) and 13.0 (10-17; P<0.01), respectively. Ratings for hoarseness and breathiness were 0.5 (P<0.01) and 1.0 (P<0.01) and 2.0. Values for jitter were 0.2 (0.0; P=0.02) versus 0.4 (0.7), shimmer 1.3 (0.7; P<0.01) versus 2.3 (1.2), HNR 26.7 (2.3; P<0.01) versus 23.7 (3.2), and NNE -12.3 (3.0, P<0.01) versus -9.2 (3.4; P<0.01). Improvement in the voice therapy group was significantly better than in patients who received omeprazole alone. Dysphonia is a significant problem in GER. Treatment for GER improves dysphonia, but in addition, voice therapy enhances the improvement.

Review article: The laryngological manifestations of reflux disease; why the scepticism?

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing clinical and experimental evidence of its existence, otolaryngological manifestations of reflux disease remain controversial, concerning diagnosis as well as treatment.

AIM

Proper understanding of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).

METHOD

Review of literature.

RESULTS

Scepticism concerning LPRD is based upon differences between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and LPRD; lack of specificity and sensitivity of diagnostic tests to confirm LPRD; non-specificity of laryngological symptoms, which are difficult to distinguish from other causes of upper respiratory tract inflammation; non-specificity of laryngological signs in laryngoscopy, with high intra- and inter-observer variability in evaluation; diagnosis of LPRD is essentially only based on a combination of diagnostic signs and symptoms, which cannot be attributed to other pathology; slow, or sometimes lack of, response of LPRD symptoms to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication and lack of evidence concerning efficacy of PPIs in placebo-controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

LPRD remains a diagnosis by exclusion and resolution of symptoms following 4-month trial of 40 mg PPI twice daily is, for all practical purposes, considered proof of the initial diagnosis. However, non-response does not exclude LPRD as PPIs have no influence on noxious non-acid components of the refluxate.

Limited diagnostic value of laryngopharyngeal lesions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux during routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is growing evidence that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may cause typical laryngeal/pharyngeal lesions secondary to tissue irritation. The prevalence of those lesions in GERD patients is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of GERD signs in the laryngopharyngeal area during routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

METHODS

Between July 2000 and July 2001, 1,209 patients underwent 1,311 upper gastrointestinal endoscopies and were enrolled in this study. The structured examination of the laryngopharyngeal area during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was videotaped for review by three gastroenterologists and one otorhinolaryngologist, blinded to the endoscopic esophageal findings. From the 1,209 patients enrolled in this prospective study, all patients (group I, N = 132) with typical endoscopical esophageal findings of GERD (Savary-Miller I-IV) were selected. The sex- and age-matched control group II (N = 132) underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for different reasons, had no reflux symptoms, and had normal esophagoscopy.

RESULTS

In the two groups of patients, we found no difference in the prevalence of abnormal interarytenoid bar findings (32%vs 32%), arytenoid medial wall erythema (47%vs 43%), posterior commissure changes (36%vs 34%), or posterior cricoid wall edema (1%vs 3%). The only difference was noted in the posterior pharyngeal wall cobblestoning (66%vs 50%, P= 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The results of this large systematic investigation challenge the diagnostic specificity of laryngopharyngeal findings attributed to gastroesophageal reflux.

Acoustic Analysis Findings in Objective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the effects of objective laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) on the acoustic parameters of patients by comparing their voice samples with that of control subjects.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study in two tertiary reference hospitals.

METHODS

48 consecutive patients with symptoms related to LPR and 64 control subjects were included in the study. Suspected LPR patients underwent a 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring, and 25 (52%) of them were shown to have objective LPR. Acoustical evaluation results of objective LPR patients were compared with that of symptomatic LPR patients and control subjects.

RESULTS

All frequency perturbation values obtained from objective and symptomatic LPR patients were higher than the control subjects (P<0.01). Mean fundamental frequency, amplitude perturbation measures, and noise-to-harmonics ratio were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

LPR patients have significantly different frequency perturbation values than control subjects.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in chronic laryngitis: prevalence and response to acid-suppressive therapy

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux is thought to cause chronic laryngitis through laryngopharyngeal reflux. Response of laryngitis to treatment with acid-suppressive therapy supports this causal link.

AIM

To determine the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with chronic laryngitis and response to proton-pump inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

Patients with chronic laryngitis were recruited. The frequency and severity of reflux and laryngeal symptoms were scored and laryngitis graded by laryngoscopy. All patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring before receiving lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was 65.6% (21 of 32). Based on positive pH test, the prevalence was 25% (eight of 32). The change in laryngeal symptom score and laryngitis grade was significantly higher in GERD compared with non-GERD patients (P = 0.010 for both). The proportion of patients with marked/moderate improvement in laryngeal symptoms were significantly higher in patients with reflux (14 of 21, 67%) compared to those without reflux (two of 11, 18%; P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease amongst our patients with chronic laryngitis was high. The response to treatment with proton-pump inhibitors in patients with reflux disease compared to those without underlined the critical role of acid reflux in a subset of patients with chronic laryngitis.

Nasal pain disrupting sleep as a presenting symptom of extraesophageal acid reflux in children

A constellation of otolaryngologic signs and symptoms has been suggested to identify the association between extraesophageal reflux disease (EERD) and pediatric otolaryngologic disorders. We describe chronic nasal pain as a manifestation of laryngopharyngeal acid reflux in a 4-year-old boy who presented with frequent night awakenings due to severe nasal pain. His presentation, relevant history physical examination, diagnostic studies, and response to therapy are described. This is the first report documenting nasal pain resolved with acid suppressive therapy in a child with EERD. The incidence and pathogenesis of EERD induced nasal symptoms in children merits further investigation.

Heterotopic gastric mucosa in the cervical esophagus: could this play a role in the pathogenesis of laryngopharyngeal reflux in a subgroup of patients with posterior laryngitis?

OBJECTIVE

Acid secretion produced by a heterotopic gastric mucosal patch (HGMP) in the proximal esophagus, instead of gastric acid, may be responsible for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), passing the upper esophageal sphincter. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of HGMP in the proximal esophagus in patients with posterior laryngitis indicating the presence of LPR in comparison with a control group and to elucidate the possible role of this lesion in the pathogenesis of LPR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 36 consecutive patients with posterior laryngitis diagnosed on laryngoscopic examination were enrolled in the study. Esophagoscopy and ambulatory 24-h intra-esophageal dual-probe pH monitoring were performed in all patients. During endoscopy, special attention was paid to the proximal part of the esophagus, and the proximal electrode for pH monitoring was placed in this region under endoscopic view. The control group comprised 660 consecutive patients who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the usual indications. When HGMP was found, biopsies were taken for histological confirmation.

RESULTS

HGMP was detected in 5 out of 36 patients. One out of five patients with patches was excluded from the study because the histopathology of this patient's patch revealed antral-type mucosa, which is not capable of acid secretion. Thus a total of 35 patients were included in the study, yielding a HGMP prevalence of 11.4% (4/35). Compared with the prevalence of the control group (1.6%), a significant difference was observed (p<0.005). pH monitoring showed that 45.4% of the patients had abnormal proximal acid reflux. All of four HGMP (+) patients with posterior laryngitis revealed significantly higher abnormal proximal reflux compared to the patients without patches (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This first preliminary study may suggest that HGMP in the cervical esophagus could play a role in the pathogenesis of LPR, at least in a minor group of patients with posterior laryngitis, depending on its capability to produce acid in situ, although isolated proximal reflux could not be demonstrated. This finding may need to be supported by further studies with larger patient populations and using acid stimulation tests.

Changing impact of gastroesophageal reflux in medical and otolaryngology practice

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

A major trend in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an observed increased prevalence of the problem, with an associated burden on health care resources. There are relatively few objective reports of increasing prevalence of this disease, and there are no epidemiologic reports that discuss changing practice strategies in managing the disease. The clinical problem is of critical importance to practicing otolaryngologists, who manage the impact of GERD on diseases affecting the ear, nose, and throat. The hypothesis of this thesis is that 1) GERD is an increasing problem affecting outpatient office visits over time, and 2) the disease is increasingly managed with prescription pharmacotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective national medical database review using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

METHODS

Twelve years of data (1990-2001) were examined with visits weighted to provide U.S. estimates of care. Average annual frequencies and visit rates were calculated for total visits and by age, sex, race, and physician specialty. Selected issues in GERD treatment were also examined, including prescriptions and physician/patient counseling regarding stress management, tobacco abuse, and diet modification. Trends were reported based on changes in care across three time periods to satisfy statistical significance: 1990 to 1993, 1994 to 1997, and 1998 to 2001.

RESULTS

Between 1990 and 1993 and 1998 and 2001, there was a significant increase in U.S. ambulatory care visits for GERD, from a rate of 1.7 per 100 to 4.7 per 100. There were no significant changes in race, although there was a small trend toward increased GERD visits in the age group over 44 years old and in the male sex. Office visits to otolaryngologists increased from 89,000 to 421,000 between the time periods of 1990 to 1993 and 1998 to 2001. This also represented a percent increase in office encounters by otolaryngologists compared with visits by all specialties from 2.9% to 4.4%. Over the three time periods, there was a fall in prescriptions for histamine (H2) blockers from 58.1% to 20.7% of total prescriptions. Over the same three time periods, prescriptions of proton pump inhibitors increased from 13.2% to 64.6%. Physician recommendations for over the counter medications fell from 18.8% to 6.6%. Average annual counseling during ambulatory care visits for GERD was assessed for the period from 1998 to 2001 as follows: diet counseling was provided at 27.2% of encounters, tobacco cessation counseling was provided at 3.9%, and stress management was discussed at 3.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

During the 1990s, there was a substantial increase in the use of ambulatory care services for GERD. Although much of this increase was among the primary care community, otolaryngologists appeared to have an increasingly prominent role in the management of this disease. There have also been dramatic changes in physician prescribing patterns for GERD, with the emergence of the predominant role of proton pump inhibitors. However, the use of physician counseling for lifestyle modification of factors known to affect GERD remains very low. The increasing impact of GERD on physician practice emphasizes the importance of both physician and patient education in the delivery of health care related to this disease.

Clinical manifestations and complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

Gastroesophageal reflux-induced diseases are among the most common disorders and are associated with classical oesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) including a range of symptoms such as heartburn, acid regurgitation and chest pain, and also organic manifestations such as oesophagitis, oesophageal strictures and ulcerations, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Recognition of its impact on other organ systems, extra-oesophageal reflux diseases, such as the ear, nose and throat (ENT) region and the bronchopulmonary system, as well as its contribution to symptoms such as chest pain and sleep disturbances, is also increasing. This paper addresses the symptoms, diseases and complications in which the abnormal reflux of gastric content to the oesophagus and adjacent organ systems is believed to be a frequent contributory factor.

Pachydermia is Not Diagnostic of Active Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

OBJECTIVE

To determine the change in pachydermia/posterior commissure hypertrophy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPR) on long-term acid-suppressive therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with LPR who were compliant with long-term acid-suppressive treatment and had good control of their symptoms for at least 20 months were examined. Pre- and posttreatment still laryngeal images from these patients were analyzed by five otolaryngologists blinded to patient information and were scored for pachydermia/posterior commissure hypertrophy according to the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) subset. Test-retest intraobserver reliability, intergrader correlations, as well as a paired t test for means of the data sets were then calculated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the grading scores between the pre- and posttreatment group for degree of pachydermia/posterior commissure hypertrophy despite a prolonged treatment interval (mean = 32 months) (P = .25).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no statistically significant difference in the degree of pachydermia/posterior commissure hypertrophy found at diagnosis and after long-term acid suppressive therapy in patients with LPR. Therefore, it appears that pachydermia, as an isolated finding, is unreliable in determining the presence of active LPR.

Predictors of outcome in an open label, therapeutic trial of high-dose omeprazole in laryngitis

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux is implicated in some cases of laryngitis. There are no established predictors of response to acid suppression therapy in suspected reflux laryngitis.

AIM

In a population with laryngitis, the aim is to determine whether (a) omeprazole 20 mg tds (3 months) improves symptoms and laryngitis, and (b) the outcome in response to potent acid suppression can be predicted by esophageal and/or pharyngeal parameters during ambulatory pH monitoring or by other pretreatment variables.

METHODS

From the 70 consecutive patients with laryngitis screened, 20 patients met the inclusion criteria (dysphonia >3 months; laryngoscopically demonstrated laryngitis); and 50 patients were excluded because of one or more criteria indicating alternative causes for laryngeal injury. The primary outcome measure was improvement of at least one level in a 4-point laryngitis grading at 3 months. Twenty-four-hour dual, pharyngo-esophageal pH monitoring was performed at baseline. Secondary outcomes (symptom questionnaire; computerized voice analysis) were measured at baseline, and at 6 and 12 wk.

RESULTS

Response rates at 6 and 12 wk were 47% and 63%, respectively. GERD symptoms (heartburn (p= 0.03) and regurgitation (p= 0.0001)) improved. However, neither baseline GERD symptoms nor endoscopic findings predicted laryngoscopic or symptomatic response. Neither baseline laryngitis grade (p= 0.46) nor esophageal acid exposure on pH testing (p= 0.3) predicted outcome. Four of 20 patients demonstrated pharyngeal regurgitation on pH testing, all four of whom responded to potent acid suppression (p= 0.2). Computerized voice measures were not predictive of outcome, although fundamental frequency (Fo) was inversely related to baseline laryngoscopic grade.

CONCLUSION

In a carefully defined population of patients with laryngitis (a) 63% have a laryngoscopic response to 3 months of potent acid suppression without significant improvement in laryngeal symptoms; (b) neither voice measures, esophageal acid exposure time, symptoms nor severity of laryngitis predict outcome; and (c) although numbers were small, all patients with a positive pharyngeal pH study responded to therapy and pharyngeal pH-metry may prove useful; (4) available evidence supports an empiric trial of high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPI), for at least 12 wk, as the initial diagnostic step for suspected reflux laryngitis.

Extraesophageal manifestations of GERD

The association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and extraesophageal disease is often referred to as extraesophageal reflux (EER). This article reviews EER, discussing epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment with a focus on the most studied and convincing EER disorders-asthma, cough, and laryngitis. Although EER comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders, some general characterizations can be made, as follows. First, although GERD's association with extraesophageal diseases is well-established, definitive evidence of causation has been more elusive, rendering epidemiological data scarce. Secondly, regarding the pathogenesis of EER, 2 basic models have been proposed: direct injury to extraesophageal tissue by acid and pepsin exposure or injury mediated through an esophageal reflex mechanism. Third, because heartburn and regurgitation are often absent in patients with EER, GERD may not be suspected. Even when GERD is suspected, the diagnosis may be difficult to confirm. Although endoscopy and barium esophagram remain important tools for detecting esophageal complications, they may fail to establish the presence of GERD. Even when GERD is diagnosed by endoscopy or barium esophagram, causation between GERD and extraesophageal symptoms cannot be determined. Esophageal pH is the most sensitive tool for detecting GERD, and it plays an important role in EER. However, even pH testing cannot establish GERD's causative relationship to extraesophageal symptoms. In this regard, effective treatment of GERD resulting in significant improvement or remission of the extraesophageal symptoms provides the best evidence for GERD's pathogenic role. Finally, EER generally requires more prolonged and aggressive antisecretory therapy than typical GERD requires.

Supra-oesophageal manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Since the early 1960s, many studies have been published that consider the possible relationship between gastro-oesophageal (acid) reflux (GORD) and various other complaints, including dental erosions, ear, nose and throat problems, chronic cough and asthma. Although a high coincidence of GORD and these supra-oesophageal complaints have been noted, there is no consensus on the pathophysiology and management of such complications. In this article we review the literature published between 1966 and 2000 on this subject. We also analyse the available information on the incidence, pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic approach and therapeutic options in the various subgroups of disorders.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Symptoms Versus pH Monitoring Results

OBJECTIVES: The reason why some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have symptoms of upper aerodigestive system irritation, while others mainly have gastroenterologic symptoms, is not well established. This retrospective case series study was designed to examine the existence of a correlation between symptoms and reflux characteristics, based on data obtained from esophageal pH monitoring.

METHODS: The study population consisted of 139 patients; 97 patients presented with laryngopharyngeal symptoms of GERD, including unexplained hoarseness, throat clearing, chronic cough, laryngospasm, globus, throat pain, and 42 patients presented with gastroenterologic symptoms, including heartburn and regurgitation. The results of 24-hour, double-channel ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring were analyzed comparing 2 symptom groups. The incidence of abnormal acid reflux at the upper and lower esophageal segments and the effects of upright and supine positions on reflux parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS: The incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux was significantly higher in the laryngopharyngeal symptom group than in the other (52% versus 38%). The patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux from both groups showed no significant differences in terms of number of acid reflux episodes, percentage of times pH was <4, and esophageal acid clearance. Upright and supine parameters did not show significant differences between the patient groups. Upright acid reflux episodes were, however, common in both groups at the lower esophageal and laryngopharyngeal segments.

CONCLUSION: Recent studies suggesting that otolaryngologic patients commonly show upright, daytime reflux with normal esophageal clearance and that typical GERD patients commonly have supine, nocturnal reflux with prolonged esophageal clearance are not supported by this study. This study indicates that acid reflux parameters and positional changes are not sufficient to explain why patients with GERD experience different symptoms. The regional symptoms of GERD may be attributed to the impairment of epithelial resistance, motor activity, and buffering systems for the esophageal antireflux barrier.

Cell biology of laryngeal epithelial defenses in health and disease: further studies

This is the second annual report of an international collaborative research group that is examining the cellular impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) on laryngeal epithelium. The results of clinical and experimental studies are presented. Carbonic anhydrase (CA), E-cadherin, and MUC gene expression were analyzed in patients with LPR, in controls, and in an in vitro model. In patients with LPR, we found decreased levels of CAIII in vocal fold epithelium and increased levels in posterior commissure epithelium. The experimental studies confirm that laryngeal CAIII is depleted in response to reflux. Also, cell damage does occur well above pH 4.0. In addition, E-cadherin (transmembrane cell surface molecules, which have a key function in epithelial cell adhesion) was not present in 37% of the LPR laryngeal specimens. In conclusion, the laryngeal epithelium lacks defenses comparable to those in esophageal epithelium, and these differences may contribute to the increased susceptibility of laryngeal epithelium to reflux-related injury.

Pediatric otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease

In adults, an estimated 4% to 10% of chronic, nonspecific laryngeal disease seen in otolaryngologic clinics is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although no such estimates exist in children, many investigators have reported extraesophageal manifestations of GERD, of which the most common is the association of GERD with asthma and chronic cough. A variety of signs and symptoms of otolaryngologic disease also have been attributed to GERD, including hoarseness, laryngitis, chronic rhinitis, sinusitis, globus pharyngeus, recurrent croup, laryngomalacia, stridor, subglottic stenosis, otalgia, vocal cord granulomas, and oropharyngeal dysphagia. However, proof of the association between these manifestations of otolaryngologic disease and GERD is sparse. Furthermore, the manifestations of otolaryngologic disease often occur in the absence of such classic systems of GERD as heartburn or chest pain. This review explores the role of GERD in otolaryngologic disease in children.

Bulimia and swallowing: cause for concern

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is evidence of a relationship between bulimia and abnormalities in swallowing function.

METHOD

Literature review across a variety of professional areas concerning the physiological effects of bulimia on oropharyngeal swallow structures and function.

RESULTS

Investigations of bulimic subjects have identified abnormalities in the oral cavity and oropharynx including dental erosion, changes in taste, tissue manifestations, and potential motility disorders that could impact swallowing function.

DISCUSSION

While there is cause for concern regarding the effects of repeated self-induced vomiting behavior in bulimic subjects on swallowing function, more research is needed.

Hospitalization with respiratory disease following hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis in a prospective, population-based study

PURPOSE

Hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis have been associated with respiratory manifestations, though the temporal sequence of this relationship is uncertain. This study examined prospectively the relationship of hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis with respiratory outcomes in a representative sample of the United States population.

METHODS

6928 participants in the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a population-based sample initially examined in 1971-1975, who were hospitalized during follow-up through 1992-1993 composed the study population. The relationship between hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis hospitalization and a subsequent hospitalization with respiratory outcomes was measured in persons free of respiratory disease at baseline and at first hospitalization.

RESULTS

Multivariable survival analysis showed higher rates of hospitalization with any respiratory diagnosis [rate ratio (RR) = 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.7] in persons with preceding hiatal hernia or reflux esophagitis hospitalization. Individually, rate ratios of pharyngitis (RR = 5.6, CI 2.0-15.7), tonsillitis (RR = 8.0, CI 2.5-25.8), bronchitis (RR = 1.8, CI 1.2-2.7), pneumonia (RR = 1.3, CI 1.0-1.7), emphysema (RR = 2.9, CI 1.5-5.5), asthma (RR = 2.1, CI 1.1-4.2), bronchiectasis (RR = 6.2, CI 1.1-34.3), and empyema or abscess (RR = 7.4, CI 1.3-42.3) were all higher following hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis. Rate ratios were similar when reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia were examined separately.

CONCLUSIONS

A prior hiatal hernia or reflux esophagitis hospitalization increased risk of respiratory disease hospitalization.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux: state of the art diagnosis and treatment

Gastroesophageal reflux has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a wide variety of otolaryngologic disorders. Patients with otolaryngologic disorders associated with gastroesophageal reflux infrequently have the classic symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, such as heartburn. Clinical presentation of laryngopharyngeal reflux is commonly characterized by chronic intermittent symptoms. A meticulous synthesis of the information obtained from a complete otolaryngologic examination, diagnostic tests, and response to treatment is essential for the efficient management of patients with otolaryngologic disorders associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

High incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

Laryngopharyngeal reflux may play a role in the etiology of squamous cell cancer of the head and neck and contribute to complications in head and neck cancer patients after surgery or during radiotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

METHODS

To investigate the incidence of laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with head and neck cancer, ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring was performed in 24 untreated patients with laryngeal or pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. In addition, 10 patients who had been irradiated in the head and neck area were analyzed for reflux to study the effect of radiotherapy on reflux.

RESULTS

Only 4 of the 24 head and neck cancer patients (17%) had neither pathological laryngopharyngeal nor gastroesophageal reflux. Esophageal acid exposure was abnormal in five patients and acid exposure at the level of the upper esophageal sphincter was abnormal in four patients. Eleven patients had pathological reflux in both areas. Irradiated patients did not differ from the untreated patients considering the incidence of pathological laryngopharyngeal or gastroesophageal reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

The data obtained in this study indicate that reflux is a common event in head and neck cancer patients.

Histopathology of reflux-induced esophageal and supraesophageal injuries

As many as half of patients who have symptoms and objective evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) will have normal mucosa or only hyperemia at endoscopy. Because inflamed esophageal mucosa may appear normal endoscopically, and because hyperemia may or may not reflect histologic espophagitis, biopsy to document tissue injury in symptomatic patients with these minimal endoscopic findings may be helpful. Reflux may induce inflammation in the squamous mucosa of the esophagus, but in many patients only hyperplasia of the epithelium is seen. This hyperplasia is defined by a basal zone that exceeds 15% of the thickness of the mucosa and subepithelial papillae that exceed 67% of the thickness of the mucosa. Because these changes may be present normally in the distal 2.5 cm of the esophagus, and because they may be distributed over the distal 8 cm in a patchy fashion, multiple biopsies taken more than 2.5 cm above the esophagogastric junction are necessary to detect them reliably. Supraesophageal complications of GERD include posterior laryngitis, inflammatory polyp of the larynx (contact ulcer or laryngeal granuloma), subglottic stenosis and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Pharyngeal acid reflux in patients with single and multiple otolaryngologic disorders

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of pharyngeal acid reflux (PAR) events in single and multiple otolaryngologic disorders.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with otolaryngologic symptoms and objective findings and 34 healthy control subjects were studied with an ambulatory 24-hour, 3-site pharyngoesophageal pH monitoring technique. Otolaryngologic diagnosis included isolated posterior laryngitis (PL) in 28 patients, isolated chronic rhinosinusitis (SIN) in 12, combined PL and SIN (PL+SIN) in 6, PL plus laryngotracheal stenosis (PL+LTS) in 12, and PL plus vocal cord nodules (PL+VCN) in 9.

RESULTS

PAR events were documented in 68% of patients with PL, 34% of patients with SIN, 67% of patients with PL+SIN, 67% of patients with PL+LTS, 78% of patients with PL+VCN, and 21% of controls. The prevalence of PAR events in patients with isolated PL as well as those with PL combined with other disorders was significantly higher than that in patients without PL and that in controls. As a group, patients with PL had a greater number of PAR events and acid exposure time than other patients and controls. Distal and proximal esophageal reflux parameters were not significantly different among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of PAR is significantly higher in patients with isolated PL compared to patients with other isolated otolaryngologic disorders and in controls. The prevalence of PAR in isolated otolaryngologic disorders other than PL is similar to that in healthy controls. The prevalence of PAR is significantly higher in patients with both PL and other otolaryngologic disorders than in controls and in patients with isolated otolaryngologic disorders.

Reflux laryngitis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is felt to be associated with a variety of laryngeal conditions and symptoms of which "reflux laryngitis" is perhaps the most common. The most likely mechanism for laryngeal injury and symptoms is secondary to direct acid and pepsin contact, although studies concerning the cause and effect between gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngeal disorders are conflicting. Likewise, the most effective method to diagnose such patients is unclear. Empiric treatment of patients with reflux laryngitis has been shown to be effective though none of the studies are controlled.

Laryngeal mucosal histology in laryngomalacia: the evidence for gastro-oesophageal reflux laryngitis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the histopathological changes of the mucosa in laryngomalacia; look for any relationship with gastro-oesophageal reflux and to describe the histological changes of reflux laryngitis in laryngomalacia.

METHODS

We examined serial histological sections from nine cases of laryngomalacia, who had aryepiglottoplasty and compared the histopathological features with five cases of postintubation inflammatory laryngitis and five age-matched autopsy specimens of normal larynx.

RESULTS

Five of the cases of laryngomalacia had mild inflammation in the form of basal cell hyperplasia and chronic inflammation close to the basement membrane. Deeper subepithelium was oedematous. Two cases had moderate and two cases severe inflammation. The latter showed ulceration and a dense band of chronic inflammation in the immediate subepithelium with underlying oedema. Three of the cases had gastro-oesophageal reflux proven by barium swallow. Two of these showed intraepithelial eosinophils.

CONCLUSIONS

A band of inflammation of variable intensity just beneath the epithelium with oedema deep to it is the most important histological feature of laryngomalacia. The presence of intraepithelial eosinophils appears to be a histological indication for reflux aetiology of the inflammation.

Exhaled nitric oxide as a noninvasive assessment of chronic cough

Exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) has been suggested as a marker of airway inflammation. This study aimed to evaluate the role of ENO in the investigation of chronic cough. We measured ENO in 38 adult patients reporting chronic cough, in 23 healthy control subjects, and in 44 asthmatics. In addition to the regular investigation, ENO was measured by a chemiluminescent analyzer using the restricted breath technique. In the chronic cough group, 30 were considered as nonasthmatic, whereas asthma was diagnosed in eight by a positive methacholine challenge. ENO values were significantly higher in patients with chronic cough attributable to asthma as compared with those with chronic cough not attributable to asthma and to healthy volunteers (75.0 ppb; 16.7 ppb; and 28.3 ppb, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of ENO for detecting asthma, using 30 ppb as the ENO cutoff point, were 75 and 87%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 60 and 93%, and the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.8 and 0.3, respectively. We conclude that ENO may have a role in the evaluation of chronic cough. In this group of patients, low ENO suggested little likelihood of asthma. The patients with chronic cough not attributable to asthma showed a low ENO value as compared with healthy volunteers and asthmatics.

Pharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with posterior laryngitis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of 3-site 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring in patients with posterior laryngitis (PL) and the prevalence of esophageal abnormalities in this patient group.

METHODS

Twenty patients with PL and 17 healthy volunteers were studied as controls. Control subjects had transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (T-EGD) and ambulatory pH monitoring. Patients underwent T-EGD, ambulatory pH monitoring, and barium esophagram.

RESULTS

T-EGD documented no abnormality in controls. Esophagitis was present in 2 PL patients, and hiatal hernia in 3. Ambulatory pH monitoring showed that 15 PL patients and 2 controls exhibited pharyngeal acid reflux. Barium esophagram documented gastroesophageal reflux in 5 PL patients. However, none of these barium reflux events reached the pharynx. All PL patients with barium esophagram evidence of gastroesophageal reflux also showed pharyngeal acid reflux by pH monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Pharyngeal acid reflux is more prevalent in patients with PL than in healthy controls. Patients with PL infrequently have esophageal sequelae of reflux disease. Ambulatory 24-hour simultaneous 3-site pharyngoesophageal pH monitoring detects gastroesophagopharyngeal acid reflux events in most patients with PL.

Gastrointestinal manifestations of scleroderma

Gastrointestinal involvement is commonly found in scleroderma. Gastrointestinal symptoms may be the presenting symptoms for the diagnosis and may precede the actual diagnosis by months to years. The esophagus is the most frequently affected, but functional problems of the anorectum, small bowel, colon, and stomach may occur. The pathophysiologic mechanism appears to be one of smooth muscle atrophy and, to a lesser degree, fibrosis. These changes result in gastrointestinal motility disturbances and may cause GERD, pseudo-obstruction, bacterial overgrowth, and defecatory disorders. Malnutrition may be a serious consequence. The evaluation of a particular symptom in a patient with scleroderma may lead to treatment strategies that improve the patient's sense of well-being and quality of life.

Extrathoracic airway dysfunction in cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND

Cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) may originate in extrathoracic airway receptors made hypersensitive by acid-induced mucosal injury.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the role of laryngeal disease and dysfunction in the pathogenesis of GER-associated cough in nonasthmatic patients.

METHODS

Seven patients with GER-associated cough were compared with 7 patients with GER but no cough. The patients underwent fiberoptic endoscopy for assessment of laryngitis and esophagitis (expressed by scores); esophageal manometry; 24-hour pH monitoring; lung function tests; and histamine inhalation challenge with assessment of bronchial threshold (concentration provoking 10% fall in FEV1 [PC10]), extrathoracic airway threshold (concentration provoking 25% fall in the maximal midinspiratory flow [PC25MIF50]), and cough threshold (concentration provoking 5 or more coughs PCcough). The patients were reevaluated after 3 months of medical treatment for GER.

RESULTS

Patients with cough, compared with those without cough, had significantly higher laryngitis scores (P = .002), lower esophageal sphincter pressures, longer time with pH below 4 (P = .003), greater number of episodes of reflux longer than 5 minutes (P = .016), longer esophageal clearance time (P = .048), and significantly lower PC25MIF50 (P = .005) and PCcough (P = .008) values. Laryngitis score was significantly inversely related to either PCcough (P < .001) or PC25MIF50 (P <.01) but not to PC10. Laryngitis score, PC25MIF50, and PCcough were all closely related to GER severity. After GER treatment, laryngitis, PC25MIF50, and PCcough were all significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that GER-associated cough is strongly associated with laryngeal disease and dysfunction consequent to acid reflux injury in nonasthmatic patients.

Hoarseness and gastroesophageal reflux in children

The importance of a hoarse voice or voice change in children has not been stressed in the literature in the same way as it has been in adults. We present 21 children who had been suffering from chronic hoarseness for more than three months and had on fibre-optic laryngoscopy findings suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux. None of them had complained of gastroesophageal symptoms. Twenty-four hour pH monitoring revealed that 13 (62 per cent) of these children had gastroesophageal reflux, seven (33 per cent) having gastroesophageal reflux more than three times the upper limit of normal. The pH graphs highlighted frequent refluxes, ranging from 0.4 to 37.4 refluxes per hour (median of 7.3 refluxes/hour). The majority of these refluxes occurred when the child was awake as opposed to asleep, with a median of 14.8 refluxes/hour and 0.9 refluxes/hour respectively (p = 0.0009). The refluxes were classically of short duration. This study suggests that gastroesophageal reflux plays a direct role in the pathogenesis of chronic laryngitis and hoarseness in children.

A systematic evaluation of mechanisms in chronic cough

We tested the hypothesis that hyperresponsiveness of the upper airway (UAHR) is present in patients with chronic cough of diverse etiology. We determined the frequency of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), hyperresponsiveness of the upper airway, sputum eosinophilia, pulmonary aspiration, and psychological symptoms in adults with chronic cough. Consecutive adults (n = 30) presenting to a tertiary referral clinic with chronic cough were compared with a group of 20 asymptomatic adults. Measurements included histamine provocation testing with measurement of flow volume curves to determine inspiratory and expiratory airflow obstruction; hypertonic saline induced sputum for analysis of eosinophils, mast cells and lipid-laden macrophages; and a validated psychological symptom questionnaire. Symptomatic rhinitis and gastroesophageal reflux were common causes of chronic cough. BHR occurred in seven patients (23%) and in no control subjects (p < 0.05). UAHR occurred in 40% of patients with cough and in four (20%) control subjects (p > 0.05). Eosinophils were present in the sputum of more patients with cough than control subjects (50% versus 19%; p < 0.05). High degrees of eosinophilia were present in six patients with cough, including three without BHR. No subject had significant lipid-laden macrophages. There was greater somatization in patients with chronic cough; ten subjects scored in the clinically significant range (p < 0.05). Abnormalities in one or more of these tests were 7.67-fold (95% CI 1.83-34.52) more likely to occur in cough patients than control subjects. We conclude that chronic cough is a nonspecific symptom that is associated with several apparently unrelated mechanisms. These include UAHR, somatization, BHR, and eosinophilic bronchitis. UAHR cannot be implicated as a single unifying mechanism. These findings emphasize the need to systematically evaluate several different causes of cough in patients who present with chronic cough.

Effect of omeprazole on the course of associated esophagitis and laryngitis

Esophagitis has increasingly been implicated as a cause of chronic laryngitis and there is some evidence that gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is more common in patients with laryngitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with esophagitis and laryngitis responded to treatment with omeprazole. Of 74 consecutive patients with endoscopically proven GERD, 21 had laryngitis. These 21 patients with associated esophagitis and chronic laryngitis were treated for 4 weeks with omeprazole 40 mg per day. After 2 weeks of treatment and at the conclusion of the study, 2 weeks later, esophagoscopy and laryngoscopy were performed and the patients responded to a questionnaire on their symptoms. The follow-up period was 1 year. Twenty-one of the 74 patients (28.4%) had esophagitis (grade I, n = 12; grade II, n = 9) and associated laryngitis (grade I, n = 14; grade II, n = 7). The severity of the esophagitis accorded with the severity of the laryngitis. After 2 weeks' treatment with omeprazole, both the esophageal and the laryngeal symptoms had improved in all 21 patients. Endoscopically, the healing rates were 62% for esophagitis and 33.3% for laryngitis. At the end of the study period, at 4 weeks, all patients were symptom-free and the esophagitis and laryngitis had healed completely. No patient suffered from drug-induced side effects. Patients with associated laryngitis and esophagitis should be given adequate anti-reflux therapy. Both the laryngeal and esophageal symptoms improved with the omeprazole treatment, suggesting that reflux was the underlying etiology.

Gastrointestinal manifestations of scleroderma

The gastrointestinal tract is commonly involved in SSc. The esophagus is the most frequently affected, followed by the anorectal region, the small bowel, stomach, and colon. Smooth muscle atrophy and to a lesser degree fibrosis is the underlying defect responsible for the resulting abnormalities. These smooth muscle alterations have a significant impact on gastrointestinal motility, which results in secondary disorders of GER, pseudo-obstruction, bacterial overgrowth, and disordered bowel functions. The clinical presentation for these conditions ranges from asymptomatic to life-threatening. Thus, gastrointestinal evaluation and treatment of these conditions is an important aspect in the management of patients with SSc.

Esophagopharyngeal distribution of refluxed gastric acid in patients with reflux laryngitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A variety of otolaryngological abnormalities have been attributed to the contact of gastroesophageal refluxate with respective structures of the aerodigestive tract. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the pharyngoesophageal distribution of gastric acid refluxate between patients with proven laryngitis attributed clinically to gastroesophageal reflux and three control groups.

METHODS

An ambulatory 24-hour simultaneous three-site pharyngoesophageal pH monitoring technique was used to measure reflux parameters in the pharynx, proximal esophagus, and distal esophagus.

RESULTS

Between-group comparison showed no significant difference in the reflux parameters in the distal esophagus between the studied groups. A significantly higher percentage of distal reflux episodes reached the proximal esophagus in the laryngitis group than in the control groups (P < 0.01), and the number of pharyngeal reflux episodes and time of acid exposure were significantly higher in the laryngitis group than in the control groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with normal controls and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, pharyngeal reflux of gastric acid is significantly more prevalent and the ratio of proximal to distal esophageal acid reflux episodes is significantly increased in patients with posterior laryngitis. Simultaneous three-site ambulatory pharyngoesophageal pH monitoring may provide supporting evidence when the diagnosis of reflux-induced aerodigestive tract lesions is considered.

G. Paul Moore Lecture. Rational thought: the impact of voice science upon voice care

Recent evolution in scientific knowledge and technology has led to monumental improvement in the standard of care for patients with voice disorders. New concepts in anatomy, physiology, measurement, and analysis have provided voice care professionals with not merely better understanding, but moreover an extensive vocabulary with which to think about voice function and dysfunction. Previously, we had to depend too much upon anecdote and "the art of medicine." Thanks to scientific advances, we now have the tools we need for rational thought about the human voice. This is the fundamental change responsible for recent great advances in voice care.

Airway protective mechanisms: current concepts

There are at least eight mechanisms identified that result either in volume clearance of the pharynx and esophagus (secondary peristalsis and pharyngeal swallow) or prevent entry of the gastric content into the esophagus and pharynx (LES and UES), accentuate these barriers (esophago-UES and pharyngo-UES contractile reflexes), or induce closure of the vocal cords and introitus to the trachea (esophagoglottal and pharyngoglottal reflexes). The sum effect of various combinations of these mechanisms is suggested to help prevent retrograde aspiration. In other words, airway protective mechanisms against retrograde aspiration are multifactorial and involve delicate interaction between upper GI and upper airway tracts. Although the existence of these mechanisms in normal volunteers has been documented, their function in patients with retrograde aspiration and supraesophageal complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease currently awaits investigation.

Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux and laryngeal symptoms

There is some evidence from clinical, experimental and multiprobe ambulatory pH studies that gastro-oesophageal reflux is more common in patients with laryngeal symptoms and could potentially play a role in the causation of these symptoms. The proportion of unselected patients with laryngeal symptoms who have gastro-oesophageal reflux as the primary aetiology may be overestimated in some series. The symptom that has been most evaluated is hoarseness, but even for this symptom the proportion of patients who have significant reflux varies widely. There is even less agreement for other symptoms, and the data on globus sensation remains confused. It is likely that these patients present to ear, nose and throat (ENT) clinics because of the relative insensitivity of the oesophageal mucosa to acid exposure. Given the lack of specificity for routine diagnostic tests for gastro-oesophageal reflux, it is necessary to perform ambulatory pH monitoring for a secure diagnosis in these patients. Treatment studies have been surprisingly few and inadequate in design. It is suspected that there is a strong placebo response for these symptoms. No clear information on efficacy can be provided until placebo-controlled randomised studies are available.

Omeprazole for the treatment of posterior laryngitis

PURPOSE

To determine whether the patients with refractory posterior laryngitis respond to treatment with omeprazole.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixteen consecutive patients with persistent posterior laryngitis despite prior therapy with H2 blockers were recruited from outpatient university otolaryngology and gastroenterology practices. Patients received 6 to 24 weeks of omeprazole 40 mg qhs, which was increased to 40 mg twice a day for 6 weeks in four patients with continuing symptoms. Laryngoscopy, esophagoscopy, and esophageal/laryngeal symptom questionnaire were completed at entry to the study. Laryngoscopy and the questionnaire were repeated at the conclusion of the study. A follow-up questionnaire was completed at 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Laryngoscopy scores improved from 4.44 to 1.94 (nonblinded otolaryngologist) and 4.31 to 1.88 (blinded otolaryngologist) (P < 0.05). Laryngeal and esophageal symptom indices improved from 13.94 and 9.00 to 3.00 and 0.38, respectively (P < 0.05). Symptom indices increased to 7.00 and 7.33, respectively, after the discontinuation of therapy (P < 0.05 compared with the conclusion of the study). One patient intolerant of omeprazole underwent fundoplication and was asymptomatic 6 weeks after surgery. Only 3 patients had esophagitis at entry.

CONCLUSIONS

The signs and symptoms of posterior laryngitis improve with the administration of omeprazole and symptoms recur after discontinuation of therapy, suggesting that reflux is the underlying etiology. Patients with refractory symptoms, but intolerant of omeprazole, may benefit from antireflux surgery. Laryngoscopic findings of posterior laryngitis are often subtle, and many patients with posterior laryngitis do not have esophagitis.

Hoarseness in a child with gastroesophageal reflux

Hoarseness is not generally appreciated to be a manifestation of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux. We describe a case in which treatment of well-documented gastroesophageal reflux and esophagitis in a young girl with hoarseness and nocturnal cough led to resolution of these symptoms. Possible pathogenetic mechanisms and the difficulty in associating hoarseness with reflux by standard reflux testing are discussed.

The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury

Occult (silent) gastroesophageal reflux disease (GER, GERD) is believed to be an important etiologic factor in the development of many inflammatory and neoplastic disorders of the upper aerodigestive tract. In order ot test this hypothesis, a human study and an animal study were performed. The human study consisted primarily of applying a new diagnostic technique (double-probe pH monitoring) to a population of otolaryngology patients with GERD to determine the incidence of overt and occult GERD. The animal study consisted of experiments to evaluate the potential damaging effects of intermittent GER on the larynx. Two hundred twenty-five consecutive patients with otolaryngologic disorders having suspected GERD evaluated from 1985 through 1988 are reported. Ambulatory 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring was performed in 197; of those, 81% underwent double-probe pH monitoring, with the second pH probe being placed in the hypopharynx at the laryngeal inlet. Seventy percent of the patients also underwent barium esophagography with videofluoroscopy. The patient population was divided into seven diagnostic subgroups: carcinoma of the larynx (n = 31), laryngeal and tracheal stenosis (n = 33), reflux laryngitis (n = 61), globus pharyngeus (n = 27), dysphagia (n = 25), chronic cough (n = 30), and a group with miscellaneous disorders (n = 18). The most common symptoms were hoarseness (71%), cough (51%), globus (47%), and throat clearing (42%). Only 43% of the patients had gastrointestinal symptoms (heartburn or acid regurgitation). Thus, by traditional symptomatology, GER was occult or silent in the majority of the study population. Twenty-eight patients (12%) refused or could not tolerate pH monitoring. Of the patients undergoing diagnostic pH monitoring, 62% had abnormal esophageal pH studies, and 30% demonstrated reflux into the pharynx. The results of diagnostic pH monitoring for each of the subgroups were as follows (percentage with abnormal studies): carcinoma (71%), stenosis (78%), reflux laryngitis (60%), globus (58%), dysphagia (45%), chronic cough (52%), and miscellaneous (13%). The highest yield of abnormal pharyngeal reflux was in the carcinoma group and the stenosis group (58% and 56%, respectively). By comparison, the diagnostic barium esophagogram with videofluoroscopy was frequently negative. The results were as follows: esophagitis (18%), reflux (9%), esophageal dysmotility (12%), and stricture (3%). All of the study patients were treated with antireflux therapy. Follow-up was available on 68% of the patients and the mean follow-up period was 11.6 +/- 12.7 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Proximal esophageal pH-metry in patients with 'reflux laryngitis'

Fiberoptic laryngoscopic examinations were performed on 40 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, 25 of whom had persistent laryngeal symptoms (dysphonia, cough, globus sensation, frequent throat clearing, or sore throat) and 15 without laryngeal symptoms who served as disease controls. Ten patients with laryngeal symptoms but none of the controls had laryngoscopic findings consistent with reflux laryngitis. Dual-site ambulatory pH recordings were obtained with the pH electrodes spaced 15 cm apart and with the proximal sensor positioned just distal to the upper esophageal sphincter. Patients in the three groups (disease controls: group 1; patients with symptoms but without laryngoscopic findings: group 2; and patients with both laryngeal symptoms and findings: group 3) were comparable in terms of age, smoking habit, the presence of esophagitis, and distal esophageal acid exposure. Proximal esophageal acid exposure was, however, significantly increased in groups 2 and 3, and nocturnal proximal esophageal acidification occurred in over half of these patients but in none of the group 1 patients. We conclude that the subset of reflux patients who experience laryngeal symptoms show significantly more proximal esophageal acid exposure (especially nocturnally) and often have laryngoscopic findings of posterior laryngitis not observed in control reflux patients.

Peptic (contact ulcer) granuloma of the larynx

Review of published work and analysis of clinical data and pathology of four biopsy specimens from two patients with laryngeal contact granuloma showed that its peptic origin was derived from a gastro-oesophago-laryngeal reflux. It is proposed that the term "peptic granuloma" should be given to this phenomenon. This term is given further support on account of the spectacular recovery of the laryngeal lesion following antacid and antireflux treatment, rather than the traditional method of using vocal rest and speech therapy, assumed to be the best way of treating a result of mechanical irritation, the previously accepted cause of laryngeal contact granuloma.

Gastroesophageal reflux and posterior laryngitis

Esophageal acid exposure was assessed by 23-hour ambulatory pH monitoring and compared with a biopsy of the posterior larynx and proximal esophagus in 97 patients with hoarseness, burning pharyngeal discomfort, or globus sensation. Patient results were compared with normal acid exposure times obtained in 54 control subjects. In 24 patients there were laryngeal abnormalities but both esophageal biopsy results and acid exposure times were normal. Laryngeal disease was found in association with prolonged acid exposure time or esophagitis in only 17 of the 97 patients (17.5%) studied. Recent reports appear to have overestimated the importance of acid reflux as a cause of posterior laryngitis.

Detection of gastroesophageal reflux in the head and neck: the role of scintigraphy

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) present to the head and neck specialist with a myriad of nonspecific complaints that may be manifestations of pharyngoesophageal or upper airway involvement. Numerous diagnostic tests for GER have been used in the past with varying success. In the present study, gastroesophageal scintigraphy using 99mtechnetium-sulfur colloid was used to evaluate 28 patients with head and neck manifestations of GER. The role of gastroesophageal scintigraphy as an accurate and noninvasive method of detecting GER is discussed in the context of other current diagnostic modalities.