Lateral skull base surgery: a complicated pursuit?

Fully immersive virtual reality for skull-base surgery: surgical training and beyond

PURPOSE

A virtual reality (VR) system, where surgeons can practice procedures on virtual anatomies, is a scalable and cost-effective alternative to cadaveric training. The fully digitized virtual surgeries can also be used to assess the surgeon's skills using measurements that are otherwise hard to collect in reality. Thus, we present the Fully Immersive Virtual Reality System (FIVRS) for skull-base surgery, which combines surgical simulation software with a high-fidelity hardware setup.

METHODS

FIVRS allows surgeons to follow normal clinical workflows inside the VR environment. FIVRS uses advanced rendering designs and drilling algorithms for realistic bone ablation. A head-mounted display with ergonomics similar to that of surgical microscopes is used to improve immersiveness. Extensive multi-modal data are recorded for post-analysis, including eye gaze, motion, force, and video of the surgery. A user-friendly interface is also designed to ease the learning curve of using FIVRS.

RESULTS

We present results from a user study involving surgeons with various levels of expertise. The preliminary data recorded by FIVRS differentiate between participants with different levels of expertise, promising future research on automatic skill assessment. Furthermore, informal feedback from the study participants about the system's intuitiveness and immersiveness was positive.

CONCLUSION

We present FIVRS, a fully immersive VR system for skull-base surgery. FIVRS features a realistic software simulation coupled with modern hardware for improved realism. The system is completely open source and provides feature-rich data in an industry-standard format.

Automated objective surgical planning for lateral skull base tumors

PURPOSE

Surgical removal of pathology at the lateral skull base is challenging because of the proximity of critical anatomical structures which can lead to significant morbidity when damaged or traversed. Pre-operative computed surgical approach planning has the potential to aid in selection of the optimal approach to remove pathology and minimize complications.

METHODS

We propose an automated surgical approach planning algorithm to derive the optimal approach to vestibular schwannomas in the internal auditory canal for hearing preservation surgery. The algorithm selects between the middle cranial fossa and retrosigmoid approach by utilizing a unique segmentation of each patient's anatomy and a cost function to minimize potential surgical morbidity.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma resection (n = 9) were included in the cohort. Middle cranial fossa surgery was performed in 5 patients, and retrosigmoid surgery was performed in 4. The algorithm favored the performed surgical approach in 6 of 9 patients.

CONCLUSION

We developed a method for computing morbidity costs of surgical paths to objectively analyze surgical approaches at the lateral skull base. Computed pre-operative planning may assist in surgical decision making, trainee education, and improving clinical outcomes.

Petrous carotid exposure with eustachian tube preservation: a morphometric elucidation

Inadvertent injury to eustachian tube leading to cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea is a known complication associated with drilling of Glasscock's triangle to expose the horizontal petrous internal carotid artery (ICA) for management of difficult tumors (especially malignant) or aneurysms at the cranial base. Contrary to the usual approach, we hypothesize that a "medial-to-lateral" approach to Glasscock's triangle drilling will minimize eustachian tube injury. Four formalin-fixed human cadaveric heads were dissected, and underwent appropriate morphometric analysis; yielding a total of eight datasets. The diameter of the horizontal petrous ICA exposed was 4.7 ± 0.9 mm (range, 3.8 to 5.6 mm).The mean distance from the medial carotid wall midpoint to the medial-most point on the eustachian tube was 6.35 ± 0.58 mm (range, 5.4 to 7.1 mm), yielding a "safety zone" for eustachian tube, ranging 0.2 to 1.9 mm lateral to the lateral carotid wall. With the medial-to-lateral approach, the eustachian tube remained preserved in all the specimens. The results of our study provide a practical, consistent, and safe method of maximizing horizontal petrous carotid artery exposure while minimizing the eustachian tube injury.